Underground Gas Storage Market by Storage Type (Aquifers, Depleted Reservoirs, LNG Storage), Service (Balancing, Injection, Withdrawal), Contract Duration, Application, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Underground Gas Storage Market was valued at USD 111.25 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 120.63 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.22%, reaching USD 225.29 billion by 2032.
A concise strategic introduction to the evolving role of underground gas storage in modern energy systems and infrastructure planning
Underground gas storage plays an indispensable role in energy systems, providing operational flexibility, reliability during demand peaks, and a buffer against supply disruptions. As thermal and industrial consumers demand greater resilience, storage assets increasingly underpin integrated gas networks and are seen as strategic infrastructure by policymakers and operators alike. The technical variety of storage options-from porous rock formations to engineered caverns-allows system planners to match geologic characteristics with operational requirements, optimizing for injection and withdrawal rates, cushion gas strategies, and safety margins.
Recent shifts in energy policy, decarbonization goals, and the evolving role of natural gas within power systems have elevated the strategic importance of storage. Enhanced digital monitoring, more sophisticated subsurface modeling, and advances in well and pipeline control systems have improved asset performance and risk management. Consequently, decision-makers are re-evaluating storage portfolios through a lens that balances operational reliability, regulatory compliance, and long-term system flexibility. This introductory overview frames the subsequent sections by highlighting how technical options, policy dynamics, and commercial arrangements intersect to shape near-term priorities for asset owners, grid operators, and regulators.
How technological upgrades, regulatory imperatives, and commercial contract evolution are reshaping underground gas storage operations and strategic value
The landscape for underground gas storage is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological progress, regulatory adaptation, and changing demand patterns. On the technology front, digital twin models, real-time reservoir surveillance, and predictive maintenance tools are increasing operational transparency and reducing unplanned downtime. These capabilities enable operators to deploy more dynamic injection and withdrawal strategies while maintaining rigorous safety and environmental standards. In parallel, policy shifts toward cleaner energy and stronger emissions reporting are prompting asset owners to integrate methane management programs and to consider electrification pathways for surface facilities.
Commercially, shifting contract structures and the need for more flexible capacity products are altering how storage is monetized. Market participants are moving away from rigid long-term block contracts and experimenting with more granular, performance-based agreements that better align with fluctuating demand profiles. Additionally, the intersection of gas storage with renewable integration-providing seasonal balancing services to complement variable generation-creates new value streams but also requires redefinition of operational criteria and measurement frameworks. Taken together, these forces are reshaping investment priorities, risk frameworks, and operational practices across the value chain, compelling stakeholders to adapt governance, asset management, and commercial strategies to remain competitive.
Assessing how newly implemented United States tariff measures will reverberate through procurement, maintenance, financing, and cross-border collaboration in storage projects
The imposition of tariffs by the United States in 2025 introduces a complex suite of impacts that extend across equipment procurement, capital project timelines, and international trade relationships. Tariffs on imported components for compressors, control systems, and modular surface facilities increase upfront procurement costs and can delay commissioning when suppliers reorient supply chains to mitigate duties. In response, developers may lengthen vendor qualification cycles, prioritize domestic sourcing where feasible, and engage in more rigorous total-cost analyses that account for duty exposure and logistics.
Beyond capital goods, tariffs influence the economics of cross-border service provision and aftermarket support. Higher costs for imported spare parts can elevate maintenance budgets and shift inventory strategies toward holding larger safety stocks domestically. Financing structures may also be affected as lenders reassess project risk linked to procurement uncertainty, potentially tightening covenants or requesting additional contingency reserves. At the geopolitical level, tariffs can provoke reciprocity and complicate collaborative projects involving multinational consortia, which in turn may reduce the pool of international bidders for large-scale storage projects.
Mitigation strategies include nearshoring critical suppliers, redesigning systems to utilize domestically available components, and engaging in proactive tariff planning during contract negotiations. Regulatory engagement and industry coordination can help clarify classification and exemptions for essential infrastructure components. While tariffs create short- to medium-term friction, they also incentivize supply chain diversification and localized industrial capabilities that may strengthen resilience over time.
Granular segmentation insights showing how geology, application profiles, contract tenors, and end-use demands intersect to define asset-level strategies and priorities
Understanding market dynamics requires careful segmentation because technical and commercial drivers differ significantly across storage types, applications, and contractual frameworks. Storage Type distinctions between Aquifers, Depleted Reservoirs, LNG Storage, and Salt Caverns determine geological risk profiles and operational flexibility, with Depleted Reservoirs further differentiated by Deep and Shallow varieties that influence cushion gas needs, well configurations, and reservoir deliverability. Application-based segmentation recognizes that Emergency Response, Peak Shaving, and Seasonal Balancing impose distinct performance requirements, and that Peak Shaving itself splits into High-Calorific and Low-Calorific use cases that affect blending, metering, and regulatory compliance.
Service-focused segmentation-Balancing, Injection, and Withdrawal-clarifies revenue and operational priorities, as each service carries different throughput patterns, metering complexity, and contractual obligations. Contract Duration categories of Long Term and Short Term shape risk allocation and capital recovery mechanisms; within Short Term, Less Than Six Months and Six To Twelve Months options impose different logistical and commercial responsiveness standards. End Use segmentation across Industrial, Power Generation, and Residential illustrates divergent customer expectations and regulatory constraints, with Industrial demand further divided into Chemical and Manufacturing subsegments that have bespoke reliability and gas quality requirements. Synthesizing these dimensions reveals that optimized asset strategies must be finely tuned to the interplay of geologic characteristics, service profiles, contract tenor, and end-use requirements to achieve operational effectiveness and commercial viability.
Regional differentiation in regulatory, commercial, and technical drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape storage investment and operation
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on regulatory frameworks, investment appetites, and technology deployment across the underground gas storage ecosystem. In the Americas, operators encounter a mix of mature infrastructure and opportunities for capacity repurposing, set against evolving emissions policies and an emphasis on infrastructure resilience. This region favors modular upgrades and enhanced monitoring as ways to extend asset life and maintain reliability during peak demand events.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory stringency and market design vary widely. In many European markets, stringent methane reduction targets and integration with cross-border gas networks elevate environmental compliance and interoperability as primary determinants of project feasibility. In several Middle Eastern jurisdictions, newly allocated investments and strategic diversification plans are catalyzing interest in strategic storehouses, particularly where seasonal demand swings and export commitments require flexible commercial arrangements.
The Asia-Pacific region is characterized by rapid demand growth in some markets and by strategic moves to secure seasonal and peak capacity in others. Liquefied natural gas hubs, evolving pipeline interconnections, and industrial expansion shape demand profiles, while policy emphasis on energy security and supply diversification supports investments in both engineered caverns and depleted reservoir projects. Across all regions, regulatory clarity, permitting timelines, and the availability of skilled contractors remain critical determinants of project development velocity.
How incumbents, engineering specialists, and technology innovators are shaping competitive differentiation through digitalization, environmental management, and strategic partnerships
Competitive dynamics in the underground gas storage sector reflect a blend of long-established operators, specialist engineering firms, and emerging technology providers focused on digitalization and emissions reduction. Leading organizations are investing in integrated asset management platforms that combine reservoir simulation, real-time instrumentation, and advanced analytics to optimize injection and withdrawal cycles while minimizing operational disruptions. Strategic partnerships between operators and technology vendors are accelerating deployment of predictive maintenance and methane detection solutions, thereby reducing unplanned outages and supporting regulatory compliance.
At the same time, financing partners and institutional investors are increasingly scrutinizing environmental risk management and governance practices when evaluating project credentials. This scrutiny favors companies that have demonstrable programs for leak detection, robust health and safety management systems, and clear plans for decommissioning and site remediation. Collaborative models, including joint ventures and service agreements, are becoming more common as a way to allocate technical risk and to bring complementary capabilities together for complex projects. Overall, organizational capabilities that combine strong engineering, digital competence, and rigorous environmental performance stand to differentiate providers in a market that prizes reliability and regulatory alignment.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for operators to strengthen asset resilience, commercial flexibility, and regulatory compliance through technology and supply chain strategies
Industry leaders should act proactively to safeguard operational resilience and to capture new value streams as the storage landscape evolves. First, accelerate investments in digital monitoring and predictive analytics to improve asset availability and to lower unplanned maintenance costs; these technologies also create auditable records that support regulatory reporting and stakeholder confidence. Second, undertake supply chain resilience programs that include component qualification, dual sourcing, and nearshoring where feasible, thereby mitigating tariff and logistics exposure while strengthening maintenance readiness.
Third, adopt rigorous methane management and environmental governance practices as standard business processes, integrating continuous monitoring, rapid mitigation protocols, and transparent reporting. Fourth, diversify commercial offerings by developing flexible contract products and services that align with transient demand needs, including time-limited capacity and performance-based agreements that support system operators and large end users. Fifth, cultivate collaborative financing and procurement models that share risk and leverage complementary technical skills through joint ventures or long-term service partnerships. By sequencing these actions-starting with data and asset integrity, then addressing supply chain and commercial innovation-leaders can build durable competitive advantages while meeting tightening regulatory expectations.
A rigorous multi-method research approach blending stakeholder interviews, technical review, regulatory mapping, and scenario analysis to produce defensible insights
This research synthesizes a multi-method approach combining primary interviews, technical document review, regulatory analysis, and comparative case studies to ensure robust and defensible insights. Primary engagement included structured interviews with senior operators, system planners, and technical advisors to capture operational realities and strategic priorities. These interviews were supplemented by engineering literature, industry standards, and publicly available regulatory filings to validate technical assertions and to map permit and compliance obligations across jurisdictions.
Analytical methods included cross-validation of qualitative findings with technical performance indicators drawn from operational case studies, and an evaluation of procurement and supply chain dynamics informed by industry procurement specialists. Scenario analysis was used to stress-test strategic responses to policy changes and supply-chain disruptions without presenting predictive market metrics. Throughout, data integrity was ensured through triangulation among independent sources, and methodological limitations were transparently noted to aid interpretation. This layered approach supports actionable conclusions while maintaining clear boundaries between observed evidence and interpretive analysis.
A concise concluding synthesis that connects technology, regulation, and commercial strategies to durable operational and strategic outcomes for storage stakeholders
In conclusion, underground gas storage remains a cornerstone of reliable energy systems, but its role is being redefined by technological innovation, policy shifts, and evolving commercial practices. Operators that integrate advanced monitoring, proactive methane management, and supply chain resilience measures will be better positioned to navigate regulatory demands and to capitalize on changing demand patterns. Meanwhile, contract flexibility and product innovation will be central to aligning storage services with the needs of system operators and large end users seeking short-term responsiveness and long-term reliability.
Regionally nuanced strategies and collaborative business models offer pathways to de-risk development and to accelerate safe, compliant operations. Although new tariff measures and shifting geopolitical dynamics introduce short-term complexity, they also underscore the importance of diversified supply chains and domestic capability development. Ultimately, decisions grounded in rigorous technical assessment, clear regulatory engagement, and disciplined risk allocation will determine which organizations achieve sustained operational excellence and strategic value from their storage portfolios.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise strategic introduction to the evolving role of underground gas storage in modern energy systems and infrastructure planning
Underground gas storage plays an indispensable role in energy systems, providing operational flexibility, reliability during demand peaks, and a buffer against supply disruptions. As thermal and industrial consumers demand greater resilience, storage assets increasingly underpin integrated gas networks and are seen as strategic infrastructure by policymakers and operators alike. The technical variety of storage options-from porous rock formations to engineered caverns-allows system planners to match geologic characteristics with operational requirements, optimizing for injection and withdrawal rates, cushion gas strategies, and safety margins.
Recent shifts in energy policy, decarbonization goals, and the evolving role of natural gas within power systems have elevated the strategic importance of storage. Enhanced digital monitoring, more sophisticated subsurface modeling, and advances in well and pipeline control systems have improved asset performance and risk management. Consequently, decision-makers are re-evaluating storage portfolios through a lens that balances operational reliability, regulatory compliance, and long-term system flexibility. This introductory overview frames the subsequent sections by highlighting how technical options, policy dynamics, and commercial arrangements intersect to shape near-term priorities for asset owners, grid operators, and regulators.
How technological upgrades, regulatory imperatives, and commercial contract evolution are reshaping underground gas storage operations and strategic value
The landscape for underground gas storage is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological progress, regulatory adaptation, and changing demand patterns. On the technology front, digital twin models, real-time reservoir surveillance, and predictive maintenance tools are increasing operational transparency and reducing unplanned downtime. These capabilities enable operators to deploy more dynamic injection and withdrawal strategies while maintaining rigorous safety and environmental standards. In parallel, policy shifts toward cleaner energy and stronger emissions reporting are prompting asset owners to integrate methane management programs and to consider electrification pathways for surface facilities.
Commercially, shifting contract structures and the need for more flexible capacity products are altering how storage is monetized. Market participants are moving away from rigid long-term block contracts and experimenting with more granular, performance-based agreements that better align with fluctuating demand profiles. Additionally, the intersection of gas storage with renewable integration-providing seasonal balancing services to complement variable generation-creates new value streams but also requires redefinition of operational criteria and measurement frameworks. Taken together, these forces are reshaping investment priorities, risk frameworks, and operational practices across the value chain, compelling stakeholders to adapt governance, asset management, and commercial strategies to remain competitive.
Assessing how newly implemented United States tariff measures will reverberate through procurement, maintenance, financing, and cross-border collaboration in storage projects
The imposition of tariffs by the United States in 2025 introduces a complex suite of impacts that extend across equipment procurement, capital project timelines, and international trade relationships. Tariffs on imported components for compressors, control systems, and modular surface facilities increase upfront procurement costs and can delay commissioning when suppliers reorient supply chains to mitigate duties. In response, developers may lengthen vendor qualification cycles, prioritize domestic sourcing where feasible, and engage in more rigorous total-cost analyses that account for duty exposure and logistics.
Beyond capital goods, tariffs influence the economics of cross-border service provision and aftermarket support. Higher costs for imported spare parts can elevate maintenance budgets and shift inventory strategies toward holding larger safety stocks domestically. Financing structures may also be affected as lenders reassess project risk linked to procurement uncertainty, potentially tightening covenants or requesting additional contingency reserves. At the geopolitical level, tariffs can provoke reciprocity and complicate collaborative projects involving multinational consortia, which in turn may reduce the pool of international bidders for large-scale storage projects.
Mitigation strategies include nearshoring critical suppliers, redesigning systems to utilize domestically available components, and engaging in proactive tariff planning during contract negotiations. Regulatory engagement and industry coordination can help clarify classification and exemptions for essential infrastructure components. While tariffs create short- to medium-term friction, they also incentivize supply chain diversification and localized industrial capabilities that may strengthen resilience over time.
Granular segmentation insights showing how geology, application profiles, contract tenors, and end-use demands intersect to define asset-level strategies and priorities
Understanding market dynamics requires careful segmentation because technical and commercial drivers differ significantly across storage types, applications, and contractual frameworks. Storage Type distinctions between Aquifers, Depleted Reservoirs, LNG Storage, and Salt Caverns determine geological risk profiles and operational flexibility, with Depleted Reservoirs further differentiated by Deep and Shallow varieties that influence cushion gas needs, well configurations, and reservoir deliverability. Application-based segmentation recognizes that Emergency Response, Peak Shaving, and Seasonal Balancing impose distinct performance requirements, and that Peak Shaving itself splits into High-Calorific and Low-Calorific use cases that affect blending, metering, and regulatory compliance.
Service-focused segmentation-Balancing, Injection, and Withdrawal-clarifies revenue and operational priorities, as each service carries different throughput patterns, metering complexity, and contractual obligations. Contract Duration categories of Long Term and Short Term shape risk allocation and capital recovery mechanisms; within Short Term, Less Than Six Months and Six To Twelve Months options impose different logistical and commercial responsiveness standards. End Use segmentation across Industrial, Power Generation, and Residential illustrates divergent customer expectations and regulatory constraints, with Industrial demand further divided into Chemical and Manufacturing subsegments that have bespoke reliability and gas quality requirements. Synthesizing these dimensions reveals that optimized asset strategies must be finely tuned to the interplay of geologic characteristics, service profiles, contract tenor, and end-use requirements to achieve operational effectiveness and commercial viability.
Regional differentiation in regulatory, commercial, and technical drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape storage investment and operation
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on regulatory frameworks, investment appetites, and technology deployment across the underground gas storage ecosystem. In the Americas, operators encounter a mix of mature infrastructure and opportunities for capacity repurposing, set against evolving emissions policies and an emphasis on infrastructure resilience. This region favors modular upgrades and enhanced monitoring as ways to extend asset life and maintain reliability during peak demand events.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory stringency and market design vary widely. In many European markets, stringent methane reduction targets and integration with cross-border gas networks elevate environmental compliance and interoperability as primary determinants of project feasibility. In several Middle Eastern jurisdictions, newly allocated investments and strategic diversification plans are catalyzing interest in strategic storehouses, particularly where seasonal demand swings and export commitments require flexible commercial arrangements.
The Asia-Pacific region is characterized by rapid demand growth in some markets and by strategic moves to secure seasonal and peak capacity in others. Liquefied natural gas hubs, evolving pipeline interconnections, and industrial expansion shape demand profiles, while policy emphasis on energy security and supply diversification supports investments in both engineered caverns and depleted reservoir projects. Across all regions, regulatory clarity, permitting timelines, and the availability of skilled contractors remain critical determinants of project development velocity.
How incumbents, engineering specialists, and technology innovators are shaping competitive differentiation through digitalization, environmental management, and strategic partnerships
Competitive dynamics in the underground gas storage sector reflect a blend of long-established operators, specialist engineering firms, and emerging technology providers focused on digitalization and emissions reduction. Leading organizations are investing in integrated asset management platforms that combine reservoir simulation, real-time instrumentation, and advanced analytics to optimize injection and withdrawal cycles while minimizing operational disruptions. Strategic partnerships between operators and technology vendors are accelerating deployment of predictive maintenance and methane detection solutions, thereby reducing unplanned outages and supporting regulatory compliance.
At the same time, financing partners and institutional investors are increasingly scrutinizing environmental risk management and governance practices when evaluating project credentials. This scrutiny favors companies that have demonstrable programs for leak detection, robust health and safety management systems, and clear plans for decommissioning and site remediation. Collaborative models, including joint ventures and service agreements, are becoming more common as a way to allocate technical risk and to bring complementary capabilities together for complex projects. Overall, organizational capabilities that combine strong engineering, digital competence, and rigorous environmental performance stand to differentiate providers in a market that prizes reliability and regulatory alignment.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for operators to strengthen asset resilience, commercial flexibility, and regulatory compliance through technology and supply chain strategies
Industry leaders should act proactively to safeguard operational resilience and to capture new value streams as the storage landscape evolves. First, accelerate investments in digital monitoring and predictive analytics to improve asset availability and to lower unplanned maintenance costs; these technologies also create auditable records that support regulatory reporting and stakeholder confidence. Second, undertake supply chain resilience programs that include component qualification, dual sourcing, and nearshoring where feasible, thereby mitigating tariff and logistics exposure while strengthening maintenance readiness.
Third, adopt rigorous methane management and environmental governance practices as standard business processes, integrating continuous monitoring, rapid mitigation protocols, and transparent reporting. Fourth, diversify commercial offerings by developing flexible contract products and services that align with transient demand needs, including time-limited capacity and performance-based agreements that support system operators and large end users. Fifth, cultivate collaborative financing and procurement models that share risk and leverage complementary technical skills through joint ventures or long-term service partnerships. By sequencing these actions-starting with data and asset integrity, then addressing supply chain and commercial innovation-leaders can build durable competitive advantages while meeting tightening regulatory expectations.
A rigorous multi-method research approach blending stakeholder interviews, technical review, regulatory mapping, and scenario analysis to produce defensible insights
This research synthesizes a multi-method approach combining primary interviews, technical document review, regulatory analysis, and comparative case studies to ensure robust and defensible insights. Primary engagement included structured interviews with senior operators, system planners, and technical advisors to capture operational realities and strategic priorities. These interviews were supplemented by engineering literature, industry standards, and publicly available regulatory filings to validate technical assertions and to map permit and compliance obligations across jurisdictions.
Analytical methods included cross-validation of qualitative findings with technical performance indicators drawn from operational case studies, and an evaluation of procurement and supply chain dynamics informed by industry procurement specialists. Scenario analysis was used to stress-test strategic responses to policy changes and supply-chain disruptions without presenting predictive market metrics. Throughout, data integrity was ensured through triangulation among independent sources, and methodological limitations were transparently noted to aid interpretation. This layered approach supports actionable conclusions while maintaining clear boundaries between observed evidence and interpretive analysis.
A concise concluding synthesis that connects technology, regulation, and commercial strategies to durable operational and strategic outcomes for storage stakeholders
In conclusion, underground gas storage remains a cornerstone of reliable energy systems, but its role is being redefined by technological innovation, policy shifts, and evolving commercial practices. Operators that integrate advanced monitoring, proactive methane management, and supply chain resilience measures will be better positioned to navigate regulatory demands and to capitalize on changing demand patterns. Meanwhile, contract flexibility and product innovation will be central to aligning storage services with the needs of system operators and large end users seeking short-term responsiveness and long-term reliability.
Regionally nuanced strategies and collaborative business models offer pathways to de-risk development and to accelerate safe, compliant operations. Although new tariff measures and shifting geopolitical dynamics introduce short-term complexity, they also underscore the importance of diversified supply chains and domestic capability development. Ultimately, decisions grounded in rigorous technical assessment, clear regulatory engagement, and disciplined risk allocation will determine which organizations achieve sustained operational excellence and strategic value from their storage portfolios.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing integration of renewable energy storage solutions with underground gas storage facilities to balance grid fluctuations
- 5.2. Deployment of hydrogen blending in high-pressure gas storage caverns to accelerate decarbonization of gas networks
- 5.3. Adoption of digital twin and advanced monitoring technologies for real-time optimization of storage reservoir performance
- 5.4. Expansion of salt cavern storage capacity to improve seasonal gas supply flexibility and energy security in Europe
- 5.5. Strategic investment in underground storage retrofitting for combined compressed air and natural gas energy storage applications
- 5.6. Rising regulatory pressure to reduce methane emissions from underground storage operations through leak detection and sealing innovations
- 5.7. Development of multi-purpose subsurface storage hubs enabling gas, hydrogen, and CO2 storage to support integrated energy transition
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Storage Type
- 8.1. Aquifers
- 8.2. Depleted Reservoirs
- 8.2.1. Deep
- 8.2.2. Shallow
- 8.3. LNG Storage
- 8.4. Salt Caverns
- 9. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Service
- 9.1. Balancing
- 9.2. Injection
- 9.3. Withdrawal
- 10. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Contract Duration
- 10.1. Long Term
- 10.2. Short Term
- 10.2.1. Less Than Six Months
- 10.2.2. Six To Twelve Months
- 11. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Application
- 11.1. Emergency Response
- 11.2. Peak Shaving
- 11.2.1. High-Calorific
- 11.2.2. Low-Calorific
- 11.3. Seasonal Balancing
- 12. Underground Gas Storage Market, by End Use
- 12.1. Industrial
- 12.1.1. Chemical
- 12.1.2. Manufacturing
- 12.2. Power Generation
- 12.3. Residential
- 13. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Underground Gas Storage Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company
- 16.3.2. Centrica plc
- 16.3.3. China National Petroleum Corporation
- 16.3.4. Dominion Energy, Inc.
- 16.3.5. E.ON SE
- 16.3.6. Enbridge Inc.
- 16.3.7. ENGIE SA
- 16.3.8. EWE Gasspeicher GmbH
- 16.3.9. ExxonMobil Corporation
- 16.3.10. Gazprom PJSC
- 16.3.11. Kinder Morgan, Inc.
- 16.3.12. NAFTA a.s.
- 16.3.13. PetroChina Company Limited
- 16.3.14. Shell plc
- 16.3.15. Snam S.p.A.
- 16.3.16. TC Energy Corporation
- 16.3.17. TotalEnergies SE
- 16.3.18. Uniper SE
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
