Ultrasonic Sensor Market by Type (Diffuse Proximity Sensors, Retro-Reflective Sensors, Through-Beam Sensors), Application (Automation & Robotic, Distance Measurement, Flow Measurement), End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Ultrasonic Sensor Market was valued at USD 3.53 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.69 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.67%, reaching USD 5.49 billion by 2032.
How advances in transducer design, embedded signal processing, and system integration are redefining ultrasonic sensor roles across industry applications
The ultrasonic sensor landscape is maturing into a critical layer of sensing across industrial, commercial, and consumer domains, driven by advances in transducer design, signal processing, and system integration. Sensor developers increasingly couple refined piezoelectric elements and MEMS-inspired architectures with embedded microcontrollers and AI-enabled firmware to deliver higher resolution and more reliable detections in challenging environments. As a result, ultrasonic devices are moving beyond legacy proximity use cases into precise distance measurement, liquid-level control, and adaptive object profiling applications.
Transitioning from component-centric to solution-centric supply models, manufacturers and system integrators now emphasize ease of installation, interoperability with established automation buses and industrial IoT protocols, and software-defined calibration routines that reduce field commissioning time. Moreover, regulatory drivers in sectors such as automotive and aerospace are elevating requirements for functional safety and electromagnetic compatibility, prompting suppliers to invest early in certification and testing capabilities. Taken together, these technological and regulatory currents are reshaping product roadmaps, strategic partnerships, and go-to-market approaches in the ultrasonic sensor ecosystem.
Major industry transitions driven by edge intelligence, miniaturization, software-defined value, and resilient supply strategies reshaping sensor providers
Several transformative shifts are altering competitive dynamics and buyer expectations across the ultrasonic sensor market. First, the convergence of sensors with edge computing enables onboard pre-processing that reduces data bandwidth needs and accelerates response times, which in turn unlocks new applications in robotics and real-time control. Second, miniaturization trends are expanding deployments in compact devices and consumer electronics where form-factor and power consumption are critical. Third, the growing emphasis on software and calibration ecosystems is moving value capture from hardware to recurring firmware and services, changing how vendors pursue customer relationships.
Concurrently, supply chain strategies are evolving in response to geopolitical pressures and the rising importance of supplier resilience. Manufacturers are diversifying component sources, qualifying alternative suppliers, and evaluating nearshoring where feasible to mitigate disruption. Finally, sustainability considerations are prompting designers to prioritize energy efficiency and materials selection, and buyers are increasingly factoring lifecycle impact into procurement decisions. Collectively, these shifts create opportunities for agile innovators while raising the bar for legacy suppliers that must adapt product portfolios and commercial models.
Cumulative effects of new U.S. tariff measures driving supplier diversification, localized assembly, and revised procurement agreements across sensor supply chains
Policy actions implemented in the United States in 2025 have created a set of structural responses across global supply chains and procurement strategies that affect ultrasonic sensor stakeholders. Tariff-driven cost pressures have accelerated supplier diversification and increased the strategic appeal of alternative sourcing regions. As a result, engineering and purchasing teams are reassessing bill-of-materials composition, qualifying regional component manufacturers, and revisiting inventory policies to maintain continuity of supply. In many instances, companies have instituted dual-sourcing arrangements to reduce exposure to single points of failure and to preserve time-to-market for new product introductions.
Beyond sourcing adjustments, these policy shifts have incentivized greater emphasis on domestic assembly and final-stage integration for applications where geopolitical risk or lead-time certainty is paramount. This has led to selective investments in local manufacturing capabilities, partnerships with regional contract manufacturers, and adjustments to logistics networks. At the same time, procurement teams are negotiating longer-term agreements that include capacity guarantees and collaborative risk-sharing clauses, which align supplier incentives with buyer needs and help stabilize downstream production. Taken together, these measures are reshaping cost structures, supplier relationships, and program management practices across the ultrasonic sensor value chain.
Deep segmentation analysis revealing how sensor types, application demands, and industry-specific constraints drive differentiated product and go-to-market strategies
Segment-level dynamics expose where innovation and adoption are most pronounced and where incumbents face the greatest pressure to differentiate. By type, diffuse proximity sensors, retro-reflective sensors, and through-beam sensors each cater to distinct performance envelopes and installation preferences, and suppliers are optimizing transducer geometries and beam shaping to improve detection reliability for specific environments. In practice, diffuse proximity devices are being refined for compact installations and power-constrained systems, whereas retro-reflective and through-beam configurations are positioned for applications requiring longer detection ranges or immunity to ambient acoustic noise.
By application, automation and robotic systems increasingly require ultrasonic solutions that offer deterministic response, environmental robustness, and seamless integration with motion-control frameworks, while distance measurement and positioning applications prioritize resolution and repeatability. Flow measurement and level sensing demand stable performance in turbulent or multiphase conditions, leading to product enhancements in signal conditioning and adaptive filtering. Object detection use cases continue to expand in warehouse automation and safety systems where sensor fusion and cross-validating modalities are employed to improve system reliability. By end-use industry, aerospace and defense, agriculture, automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, healthcare, and oil and gas each impose unique environmental, regulatory, and reliability constraints, which in turn shape product specifications, testing protocols, and after-sales support models.
How distinctive demand patterns and supply capabilities across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape regional adoption and commercialization tactics
Regional dynamics vary notably across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, with each geography presenting distinct demand drivers and supply characteristics. In the Americas, strong adoption in industrial automation, automotive, and logistics has been supported by a mature channel ecosystem and emphasis on domestic integration capabilities, which encourages suppliers to offer local engineering support and certification services. This region also shows growing interest in retrofit solutions that enhance existing asset performance without extensive capital expenditure.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and sustainability imperatives are particularly influential, prompting manufacturers to prioritize energy-efficient designs and robust compliance documentation. Integration into broader Industry 4.0 initiatives is accelerating uptake in manufacturing hubs, while specialized applications in oil and gas and aerospace require tailored solutions and stringent testing. The Asia-Pacific region remains a major manufacturing center with extensive component ecosystems, high-volume automotive production, and rapid adoption of automation in manufacturing and logistics. Here, competitive pricing pressures coexist with rising expectations for localized customization and rapid product iteration, which favors suppliers capable of agile development and regional support networks.
Strategic moves by leading ultrasonic sensor suppliers focusing on material innovation, software-enabled services, and partnership-driven solution development
Leading companies in the ultrasonic sensor domain are pursuing a combination of product innovation, strategic partnerships, and expanded services to secure durable competitive advantages. Investment priorities include enhanced transducer materials, digital signal processing algorithms, firmware over-the-air update capabilities, and modular mechanical interfaces that simplify integration. Many suppliers are extending their value proposition beyond standalone hardware by offering calibration services, diagnostic toolkits, and integration support that reduce time-to-deployment for systems integrators and OEMs.
Collaborations with automation vendors, system integrators, and semiconductor foundries are increasingly common, enabling co-developed solutions that align sensor performance with broader control architectures. Additionally, companies are differentiating through rigorous reliability testing, extended warranty offerings, and certification support to meet industry-specific standards. On the commercial front, subscription-based software modules for advanced signal analytics and cloud-enabled device management are emerging as meaningful revenue streams that also increase customer stickiness. Overall, these strategic choices reflect a market where technical excellence and service-based differentiation determine long-term positioning.
Actionable steps for sensor manufacturers and system integrators to integrate edge processing, diversify sourcing, and build recurring service revenue streams
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of practical actions that translate current market dynamics into competitive advantage. First, accelerate integration of edge signal processing and adaptive calibration capabilities into product roadmaps to reduce system integration overhead for customers and to unlock higher-value applications. By doing so, firms can shorten deployment cycles and increase perceived solution effectiveness. Second, pursue dual-sourcing strategies and nearshore assembly partnerships to mitigate geopolitical and tariff-related disruptions while preserving cost competitiveness and delivery reliability.
Third, expand after-sales capability offerings such as remote diagnostics, predictive maintenance analytics, and modular firmware upgrades to shift part of the value chain toward recurring revenue. Fourth, invest in cross-domain partnerships with robotics, automation, and IoT platform providers to create validated, interoperable bundles that simplify procurement and accelerate adoption. Finally, strengthen compliance and sustainability reporting to meet evolving buyer expectations and regulatory requirements, thereby reducing procurement friction for customers operating in regulated industries. Implementing these recommendations will require coordinated investments across R&D, supply chain, and commercial functions, but will materially improve resilience and market responsiveness.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework combining expert interviews, technical literature review, and product-level validation for robust insight generation
The research approach combined structured primary engagement with industry participants and rigorous secondary analysis of technical literature, standards, and patent activity to produce the insights compiled in this report. Primary research involved targeted interviews with engineering leaders, procurement executives, systems integrators, and end users across core verticals to capture adoption drivers, implementation challenges, and evaluation criteria. These qualitative inputs were complemented by supplier capability mapping and product teardown assessments to validate component choices and design trade-offs.
Secondary research encompassed review of technical standards, conference proceedings, regulatory documentation, and manufacturing process descriptions to triangulate performance expectations and compliance requirements. Where appropriate, the methodology incorporated case-based analysis of deployment scenarios, reliability test protocols, and interoperability assessments with representative automation and IoT stacks. Data synthesis employed cross-validation between interview findings, product analyses, and technical literature to minimize bias and to ensure that conclusions reflect both practitioner experience and documented technical evidence.
Synthesis of technical trends and supply resilience imperatives that define strategic priorities for organizations adopting ultrasonic sensing solutions
In closing, the ultrasonic sensor domain is at a junction of technological refinement and broader systems integration that elevates its strategic importance across multiple industries. Ongoing advances in transducer and electronics design, paired with a shift toward software-enabled differentiation, are expanding the set of viable applications and increasing expectations for performance and integration support. Meanwhile, policy shifts and shifting supply-chain dynamics are prompting organizations to rethink sourcing, manufacturing footprints, and contractual relationships with suppliers, with resilience and flexibility emerging as core procurement criteria.
For decision-makers, the imperative is clear: align product development, supply strategies, and commercial models with the dual demands of enhanced technical capability and improved operational resilience. By doing so, organizations will be better positioned to capture opportunities where ultrasonic sensing provides unique value, while also navigating the complexities introduced by evolving regulatory and geopolitical environments.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
How advances in transducer design, embedded signal processing, and system integration are redefining ultrasonic sensor roles across industry applications
The ultrasonic sensor landscape is maturing into a critical layer of sensing across industrial, commercial, and consumer domains, driven by advances in transducer design, signal processing, and system integration. Sensor developers increasingly couple refined piezoelectric elements and MEMS-inspired architectures with embedded microcontrollers and AI-enabled firmware to deliver higher resolution and more reliable detections in challenging environments. As a result, ultrasonic devices are moving beyond legacy proximity use cases into precise distance measurement, liquid-level control, and adaptive object profiling applications.
Transitioning from component-centric to solution-centric supply models, manufacturers and system integrators now emphasize ease of installation, interoperability with established automation buses and industrial IoT protocols, and software-defined calibration routines that reduce field commissioning time. Moreover, regulatory drivers in sectors such as automotive and aerospace are elevating requirements for functional safety and electromagnetic compatibility, prompting suppliers to invest early in certification and testing capabilities. Taken together, these technological and regulatory currents are reshaping product roadmaps, strategic partnerships, and go-to-market approaches in the ultrasonic sensor ecosystem.
Major industry transitions driven by edge intelligence, miniaturization, software-defined value, and resilient supply strategies reshaping sensor providers
Several transformative shifts are altering competitive dynamics and buyer expectations across the ultrasonic sensor market. First, the convergence of sensors with edge computing enables onboard pre-processing that reduces data bandwidth needs and accelerates response times, which in turn unlocks new applications in robotics and real-time control. Second, miniaturization trends are expanding deployments in compact devices and consumer electronics where form-factor and power consumption are critical. Third, the growing emphasis on software and calibration ecosystems is moving value capture from hardware to recurring firmware and services, changing how vendors pursue customer relationships.
Concurrently, supply chain strategies are evolving in response to geopolitical pressures and the rising importance of supplier resilience. Manufacturers are diversifying component sources, qualifying alternative suppliers, and evaluating nearshoring where feasible to mitigate disruption. Finally, sustainability considerations are prompting designers to prioritize energy efficiency and materials selection, and buyers are increasingly factoring lifecycle impact into procurement decisions. Collectively, these shifts create opportunities for agile innovators while raising the bar for legacy suppliers that must adapt product portfolios and commercial models.
Cumulative effects of new U.S. tariff measures driving supplier diversification, localized assembly, and revised procurement agreements across sensor supply chains
Policy actions implemented in the United States in 2025 have created a set of structural responses across global supply chains and procurement strategies that affect ultrasonic sensor stakeholders. Tariff-driven cost pressures have accelerated supplier diversification and increased the strategic appeal of alternative sourcing regions. As a result, engineering and purchasing teams are reassessing bill-of-materials composition, qualifying regional component manufacturers, and revisiting inventory policies to maintain continuity of supply. In many instances, companies have instituted dual-sourcing arrangements to reduce exposure to single points of failure and to preserve time-to-market for new product introductions.
Beyond sourcing adjustments, these policy shifts have incentivized greater emphasis on domestic assembly and final-stage integration for applications where geopolitical risk or lead-time certainty is paramount. This has led to selective investments in local manufacturing capabilities, partnerships with regional contract manufacturers, and adjustments to logistics networks. At the same time, procurement teams are negotiating longer-term agreements that include capacity guarantees and collaborative risk-sharing clauses, which align supplier incentives with buyer needs and help stabilize downstream production. Taken together, these measures are reshaping cost structures, supplier relationships, and program management practices across the ultrasonic sensor value chain.
Deep segmentation analysis revealing how sensor types, application demands, and industry-specific constraints drive differentiated product and go-to-market strategies
Segment-level dynamics expose where innovation and adoption are most pronounced and where incumbents face the greatest pressure to differentiate. By type, diffuse proximity sensors, retro-reflective sensors, and through-beam sensors each cater to distinct performance envelopes and installation preferences, and suppliers are optimizing transducer geometries and beam shaping to improve detection reliability for specific environments. In practice, diffuse proximity devices are being refined for compact installations and power-constrained systems, whereas retro-reflective and through-beam configurations are positioned for applications requiring longer detection ranges or immunity to ambient acoustic noise.
By application, automation and robotic systems increasingly require ultrasonic solutions that offer deterministic response, environmental robustness, and seamless integration with motion-control frameworks, while distance measurement and positioning applications prioritize resolution and repeatability. Flow measurement and level sensing demand stable performance in turbulent or multiphase conditions, leading to product enhancements in signal conditioning and adaptive filtering. Object detection use cases continue to expand in warehouse automation and safety systems where sensor fusion and cross-validating modalities are employed to improve system reliability. By end-use industry, aerospace and defense, agriculture, automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, healthcare, and oil and gas each impose unique environmental, regulatory, and reliability constraints, which in turn shape product specifications, testing protocols, and after-sales support models.
How distinctive demand patterns and supply capabilities across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape regional adoption and commercialization tactics
Regional dynamics vary notably across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, with each geography presenting distinct demand drivers and supply characteristics. In the Americas, strong adoption in industrial automation, automotive, and logistics has been supported by a mature channel ecosystem and emphasis on domestic integration capabilities, which encourages suppliers to offer local engineering support and certification services. This region also shows growing interest in retrofit solutions that enhance existing asset performance without extensive capital expenditure.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory rigor and sustainability imperatives are particularly influential, prompting manufacturers to prioritize energy-efficient designs and robust compliance documentation. Integration into broader Industry 4.0 initiatives is accelerating uptake in manufacturing hubs, while specialized applications in oil and gas and aerospace require tailored solutions and stringent testing. The Asia-Pacific region remains a major manufacturing center with extensive component ecosystems, high-volume automotive production, and rapid adoption of automation in manufacturing and logistics. Here, competitive pricing pressures coexist with rising expectations for localized customization and rapid product iteration, which favors suppliers capable of agile development and regional support networks.
Strategic moves by leading ultrasonic sensor suppliers focusing on material innovation, software-enabled services, and partnership-driven solution development
Leading companies in the ultrasonic sensor domain are pursuing a combination of product innovation, strategic partnerships, and expanded services to secure durable competitive advantages. Investment priorities include enhanced transducer materials, digital signal processing algorithms, firmware over-the-air update capabilities, and modular mechanical interfaces that simplify integration. Many suppliers are extending their value proposition beyond standalone hardware by offering calibration services, diagnostic toolkits, and integration support that reduce time-to-deployment for systems integrators and OEMs.
Collaborations with automation vendors, system integrators, and semiconductor foundries are increasingly common, enabling co-developed solutions that align sensor performance with broader control architectures. Additionally, companies are differentiating through rigorous reliability testing, extended warranty offerings, and certification support to meet industry-specific standards. On the commercial front, subscription-based software modules for advanced signal analytics and cloud-enabled device management are emerging as meaningful revenue streams that also increase customer stickiness. Overall, these strategic choices reflect a market where technical excellence and service-based differentiation determine long-term positioning.
Actionable steps for sensor manufacturers and system integrators to integrate edge processing, diversify sourcing, and build recurring service revenue streams
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of practical actions that translate current market dynamics into competitive advantage. First, accelerate integration of edge signal processing and adaptive calibration capabilities into product roadmaps to reduce system integration overhead for customers and to unlock higher-value applications. By doing so, firms can shorten deployment cycles and increase perceived solution effectiveness. Second, pursue dual-sourcing strategies and nearshore assembly partnerships to mitigate geopolitical and tariff-related disruptions while preserving cost competitiveness and delivery reliability.
Third, expand after-sales capability offerings such as remote diagnostics, predictive maintenance analytics, and modular firmware upgrades to shift part of the value chain toward recurring revenue. Fourth, invest in cross-domain partnerships with robotics, automation, and IoT platform providers to create validated, interoperable bundles that simplify procurement and accelerate adoption. Finally, strengthen compliance and sustainability reporting to meet evolving buyer expectations and regulatory requirements, thereby reducing procurement friction for customers operating in regulated industries. Implementing these recommendations will require coordinated investments across R&D, supply chain, and commercial functions, but will materially improve resilience and market responsiveness.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework combining expert interviews, technical literature review, and product-level validation for robust insight generation
The research approach combined structured primary engagement with industry participants and rigorous secondary analysis of technical literature, standards, and patent activity to produce the insights compiled in this report. Primary research involved targeted interviews with engineering leaders, procurement executives, systems integrators, and end users across core verticals to capture adoption drivers, implementation challenges, and evaluation criteria. These qualitative inputs were complemented by supplier capability mapping and product teardown assessments to validate component choices and design trade-offs.
Secondary research encompassed review of technical standards, conference proceedings, regulatory documentation, and manufacturing process descriptions to triangulate performance expectations and compliance requirements. Where appropriate, the methodology incorporated case-based analysis of deployment scenarios, reliability test protocols, and interoperability assessments with representative automation and IoT stacks. Data synthesis employed cross-validation between interview findings, product analyses, and technical literature to minimize bias and to ensure that conclusions reflect both practitioner experience and documented technical evidence.
Synthesis of technical trends and supply resilience imperatives that define strategic priorities for organizations adopting ultrasonic sensing solutions
In closing, the ultrasonic sensor domain is at a junction of technological refinement and broader systems integration that elevates its strategic importance across multiple industries. Ongoing advances in transducer and electronics design, paired with a shift toward software-enabled differentiation, are expanding the set of viable applications and increasing expectations for performance and integration support. Meanwhile, policy shifts and shifting supply-chain dynamics are prompting organizations to rethink sourcing, manufacturing footprints, and contractual relationships with suppliers, with resilience and flexibility emerging as core procurement criteria.
For decision-makers, the imperative is clear: align product development, supply strategies, and commercial models with the dual demands of enhanced technical capability and improved operational resilience. By doing so, organizations will be better positioned to capture opportunities where ultrasonic sensing provides unique value, while also navigating the complexities introduced by evolving regulatory and geopolitical environments.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing adoption of high frequency ultrasonic sensors for precision liquid level measurement in industrial automation
- 5.2. Integration of ultrasonic sensors with AI driven edge computing for real time object detection and classification
- 5.3. Rising utilization of ultrasonic sensor arrays in autonomous vehicles for enhanced obstacle avoidance and safety
- 5.4. Development of flexible and bendable ultrasonic sensor films for wearable health monitoring applications
- 5.5. Advancements in ultrasonic flow sensors for non invasive blood flow analysis and medical diagnostics
- 5.6. Emergence of low power ultrasonic proximity sensors for energy efficient smart home and IoT systems
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Ultrasonic Sensor Market, by Type
- 8.1. Diffuse Proximity Sensors
- 8.2. Retro-Reflective Sensors
- 8.3. Through-Beam Sensors
- 9. Ultrasonic Sensor Market, by Application
- 9.1. Automation & Robotic
- 9.2. Distance Measurement
- 9.3. Flow Measurement
- 9.4. Level Sensing
- 9.5. Object Detection
- 9.6. Positioning
- 10. Ultrasonic Sensor Market, by End-Use Industry
- 10.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 10.2. Agriculture
- 10.3. Automotive
- 10.4. Consumer Electronics
- 10.5. Food & Beverage
- 10.6. Healthcare
- 10.7. Oil & Gas
- 11. Ultrasonic Sensor Market, by Region
- 11.1. Americas
- 11.1.1. North America
- 11.1.2. Latin America
- 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 11.2.1. Europe
- 11.2.2. Middle East
- 11.2.3. Africa
- 11.3. Asia-Pacific
- 12. Ultrasonic Sensor Market, by Group
- 12.1. ASEAN
- 12.2. GCC
- 12.3. European Union
- 12.4. BRICS
- 12.5. G7
- 12.6. NATO
- 13. Ultrasonic Sensor Market, by Country
- 13.1. United States
- 13.2. Canada
- 13.3. Mexico
- 13.4. Brazil
- 13.5. United Kingdom
- 13.6. Germany
- 13.7. France
- 13.8. Russia
- 13.9. Italy
- 13.10. Spain
- 13.11. China
- 13.12. India
- 13.13. Japan
- 13.14. Australia
- 13.15. South Korea
- 14. Competitive Landscape
- 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 14.3. Competitive Analysis
- 14.3.1. AMETEK, Inc.
- 14.3.2. Balluff Inc.
- 14.3.3. Banner Engineering Corp.
- 14.3.4. Baumer Ltd
- 14.3.5. Emerson Electric Co.
- 14.3.6. Hans Turck GmbH & Co. KG
- 14.3.7. Hielscher Inc.
- 14.3.8. Honeywell International Inc.
- 14.3.9. Ifm electronic GmbH
- 14.3.10. Inrix Inc.
- 14.3.11. Keyence Corporation
- 14.3.12. Leuze electronic GmbH & Co. KG
- 14.3.13. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
- 14.3.14. OMRON Corporation
- 14.3.15. Panasonic Corporation
- 14.3.16. Qualcomm Incorporated
- 14.3.17. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 14.3.18. Rockwell Automation Inc.
- 14.3.19. Schneider Electric SE
- 14.3.20. Sick AG
- 14.3.21. Siemens AG
- 14.3.22. TDK Corporation
- 14.3.23. TE Connectivity Ltd.
- 14.3.24. Texas Instruments Incorporated
- 14.3.25. Toyota Motor Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
