Twin Screw Extruder Market by Type (Co-Rotating, Counter-Rotating), Application (Chemical Processing, Feed Processing, Food Processing), Equipment Size, Drive Type, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Twin Screw Extruder Market was valued at USD 2.30 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.40 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.72%, reaching USD 3.33 billion by 2032.
Introduction to twin screw extruders exploring design principles operational modes material handling advantages and critical decision factors for procurement teams
Twin screw extruder technology sits at the intersection of mechanical design, materials science, and process engineering, making it a core enabler across multiple processing industries. The twin screw platform delivers superior mixing, controlled shear, and precise residence time control, enabling processors to achieve consistent product quality and to integrate compounding, devolatilization, and reactive extrusion into a single line. Co-rotating and counter-rotating geometries, modular screw element design, and the rise of high-torque drive systems define the evolution of the platform, while controls and instrumentation continue to improve repeatability and throughput.
As companies look to tighten production tolerances and reduce variability, the twin screw extruder increasingly becomes a strategic asset rather than a commoditized piece of equipment. Engineering teams prioritize flexibility and rapid changeover, operations managers focus on downtime reduction and energy efficiency, and supply chain leaders evaluate how equipment choice affects sourcing and aftermarket service models. Consequently, investment decisions now require integrated evaluation across technical capability, lifecycle serviceability, and supply constraints. This introduction frames the remainder of the report by highlighting the technology’s core strengths, the decision criteria that matter most to buyers, and why the twin screw extruder will remain central to modern continuous processing strategies.
Transformative shifts reshaping the twin screw extruder landscape including technological innovations sustainability trends automation integration and evolving material science applications
The twin screw extruder landscape is experiencing a set of transformative shifts that are reshaping how manufacturers design, procure, and operate processing assets. Advances in screw element metallurgy, surface engineering, and wear-resistant coatings are extending service life and expanding the range of processable materials. At the same time, digital process controls and predictive maintenance algorithms are moving extruders from reactive maintenance regimes into condition-based service models, reducing unplanned downtime and enabling higher overall equipment effectiveness.
Sustainability objectives are prompting process reconfiguration to reduce energy consumption, increase the use of recycled and engineered polymers, and integrate solvent-free reactive processing. These drivers create new performance criteria for extruder selection: the ability to handle high-viscosity recycled streams, precise thermal management to minimize degradation, and flexible screw designs that facilitate rapid product changeovers. Parallel to this, supply chain resiliency concerns and reshoring initiatives are encouraging manufacturers to reconsider sourcing strategies and invest in local aftermarket capabilities. Together, these trends are accelerating convergence between mechanical design innovation and systems-level thinking, compelling cross-functional teams to evaluate extruder investments through the lenses of sustainability, digital readiness, and supply continuity.
Assessment of impacts from United States tariffs in 2025 on twin screw extruder supply chains sourcing strategies and manufacturing decisions
The policy environment in 2025, including tariff adjustments by the United States, has introduced new complexities for companies that source twin screw extruders or rely on globally distributed supply chains for spare parts and service. Tariffs influence the comparative cost of imported machinery and components, compel reassessment of total landed cost, and can change the calculus for choosing between local manufacturing, regional hubs, or centralized production. When tariffs alter input pricing, procurement teams must rapidly re-evaluate supplier qualification, OEM partnerships, and long-term service agreements to preserve operational continuity and cost predictability.
Operational leaders are responding by diversifying supplier bases and by negotiating more robust aftermarket terms to mitigate part lead-time risk. Engineering groups are reassessing up-front specification trade-offs that might reduce dependency on imported, tariff-exposed components. At the same time, facilities planning and capital allocation teams are examining options for nearshoring or dual-sourcing critical spares and subassemblies to maintain uptime. These adjustments require close coordination across commercial, technical, and legal functions, and they underscore the importance of scenario planning: understanding which configurations and sourcing strategies minimize exposure while preserving process performance. In short, tariff-induced disruption has elevated supply chain strategy to a central concern for extruder acquisition and lifecycle management.
Segmentation insights revealing performance differentials across types equipment sizes drive configurations applications and industry verticals to inform development and strategy
Segmentation provides a structured lens to understand where performance gains and commercial opportunities align most closely with customer needs. Based on Type, the market is studied across Co-Rotating and Counter-Rotating, and that distinction clarifies trade-offs in mixing intensity, self-wiping behavior, and throughput for specific applications. Based on Application, the market is studied across Chemical Processing, Feed Processing, Food Processing, Pharmaceutical Processing, and Plastic Processing, with the Plastic Processing segment further studied across Engineering Polymers, Polyolefins, and Pvc; this application-level granularity highlights where material characteristics and regulatory constraints drive specific machine and screw choices.
Based on Equipment Size, the market is studied across 50 To 80 Mm, Greater Than 80 Mm, and Less Than 50 Mm, which informs capital planning and floor-space decisions as well as operator skill requirements. Based on Drive Type, the market is studied across Electric Drive and Hydraulic Drive, a differentiation that matters for energy efficiency, control precision, and maintenance regimes. Based on Industry Vertical, the market is studied across Agriculture, Automotive, Consumer Goods, Healthcare, and Packaging, with Healthcare further studied across Medical Devices and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing; these vertical lenses expose differing expectations for traceability, hygiene, and validation. Together, these segmentation dimensions enable vendors and end users to map technical capability to commercial demand and to prioritize investment in product features and aftermarket services where they will deliver the greatest operational and financial impact.
Regional analysis of demand drivers supply dynamics regulatory influences and considerations spanning Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific
Regional dynamics shape equipment selection criteria, aftermarket service expectations, and adoption speed. In the Americas, purchasers frequently emphasize rapid access to service, energy efficiency, and compliance with established safety and emissions standards; North American manufacturing clusters have concentrated expertise in polymer compounding and automotive components, creating localized expectations for high-torque, flexible extruder platforms. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks, sustainability mandates, and the prominence of specialty chemical and pharmaceutical processing influence demand for hygienic designs, traceability features, and validated process control packages; vendors operating in these jurisdictions must demonstrate robust documentation and local technical support.
In Asia-Pacific, growth in packaging, consumer goods, and regional polymer manufacturing drives demand for scalable equipment, competitive aftermarket pricing, and rapid installation timelines; OEMs that maintain regional parts distribution and training capability win repeat business more consistently. Currency volatility, regional energy pricing, and logistics infrastructure further differentiate investment decisions across these territories. Understanding these three regional contexts-Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific-helps manufacturers tailor product configurations, spare parts strategies, and service models to meet local operating realities while scaling offerings across global footprints.
Competitive intelligence on strategic positioning technology portfolios partnerships and aftermarket services of leading twin screw extruder manufacturers to inform procurement
Competitive dynamics among twin screw extruder suppliers reflect a mix of technology leadership, aftermarket strength, and strategic partnerships. Market leaders invest in modular architectures that allow rapid reconfiguration of screw trains and barrel sections, enabling customers to adapt lines for new materials without significant capital replacement. Other competitors differentiate through advanced control suites that integrate predictive maintenance, recipe management, and remote diagnostics, reducing lifecycle operating costs and improving first-run yields.
Partnerships with materials suppliers, software vendors, and local service providers are increasingly important to deliver turnkey solutions. Companies that combine field-proven mechanical platforms with strong installation training and spare parts networks gain durable advantages, because downtime risk and operator skill gaps are often the deciding factors in procurement. Additionally, firms that demonstrate clear pathways to improved sustainability-through lower energy consumption, compatibility with recycled feedstocks, or solvent-free processing-are better positioned to win business where corporate environmental targets drive capital approvals. Procurement teams should evaluate suppliers across these dimensions: mechanical robustness, control and analytics capability, aftermarket reach, and sustainability credentials to ensure alignment with both short-term operational needs and longer-term strategic objectives.
Recommendations for industry leaders to optimize operations accelerate innovation mitigate tariff impacts and align supply chain resilience with sustainability priorities
Industry leaders must translate insight into prioritized action to capture performance upside and to mitigate operational risks. First, align engineering specifications with downstream serviceability by selecting configurations that simplify spare parts commonality and reduce specialized maintenance skill requirements. Next, incorporate digital enablement at procurement: require control architectures that support remote diagnostics and standardized data outputs to accelerate troubleshooting and to support advanced analytics initiatives. Additionally, embed sustainability criteria into vendor evaluations, asking for validated energy consumption metrics and demonstrated compatibility with recycled or alternative feedstocks to future-proof production lines.
From a commercial perspective, diversify qualified suppliers for critical subassemblies and high-lead-time components to minimize exposure to geopolitical or tariff-driven disruption. Invest in local training programs to build operator competency and to reduce reliance on external service technicians. Finally, create cross-functional steering groups that bring procurement, engineering, operations, and compliance together early in the capital approval process to ensure equipment selection balances performance, cost, and resilience. Implementing these recommendations will shorten time-to-value, reduce lifecycle risk, and align extruder investments with broader enterprise objectives.
Methodology overview detailing primary and secondary research approaches data validation processes and analytical frameworks used to ensure rigor and reproducibility
The research methodology combines structured primary engagement with targeted secondary analysis to ensure both depth and verification. Primary research included in-depth interviews with technical leaders at processing firms, procurement managers responsible for heavy equipment acquisition, aftermarket service providers, and OEM design engineers to capture first-hand perspectives on performance trade-offs, service expectations, and procurement criteria. These interviews informed issue prioritization and validated hypotheses about operational pain points and adoption barriers.
Secondary research encompassed a systematic review of technical literature, product documentation, regulatory guidance for hygiene and safety, and case studies that illustrate performance outcomes across applications. Analytical frameworks employed scenario analysis to assess how policy shifts and supply disruptions would affect sourcing decisions, while comparative benchmarking evaluated design features such as screw element modularity, drive torque capacity, and control system capabilities. Data validation procedures included triangulation across interview responses, supplier specifications, and field performance reports to ensure conclusions rest on corroborated evidence. This blended approach balances practitioner insight with documented technical information to produce actionable, defensible findings.
Strategic conclusion synthesizing key insights risks opportunities and next steps to support executive decisions about product roadmaps partnerships and transformation
This analysis synthesizes technological, commercial, and regional considerations to provide a cohesive perspective on twin screw extruder deployment and lifecycle management. Technical evolution in screw design, materials, and controls continues to expand the processing envelope, while sustainability mandates and material circularity initiatives push suppliers to innovate toward higher efficiency and feedstock flexibility. Geopolitical developments and tariff policies have elevated supply chain risk to a boardroom-level concern, driving organizations to rethink sourcing strategies and to accelerate investments in local aftermarket capability.
For decision-makers, the critical takeaway is that equipment choice is no longer solely an engineering decision: it is a multifaceted investment that shapes operational resilience, sustainability performance, and long-term cost exposure. By aligning procurement criteria with serviceability, digital readiness, and regional supply realities, organizations can derive superior lifecycle value from extruder investments. Executives should prioritize cross-functional alignment, proactive supplier engagement, and scenario planning to ensure that equipment acquisitions support both near-term production goals and longer-term strategic transformations.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Introduction to twin screw extruders exploring design principles operational modes material handling advantages and critical decision factors for procurement teams
Twin screw extruder technology sits at the intersection of mechanical design, materials science, and process engineering, making it a core enabler across multiple processing industries. The twin screw platform delivers superior mixing, controlled shear, and precise residence time control, enabling processors to achieve consistent product quality and to integrate compounding, devolatilization, and reactive extrusion into a single line. Co-rotating and counter-rotating geometries, modular screw element design, and the rise of high-torque drive systems define the evolution of the platform, while controls and instrumentation continue to improve repeatability and throughput.
As companies look to tighten production tolerances and reduce variability, the twin screw extruder increasingly becomes a strategic asset rather than a commoditized piece of equipment. Engineering teams prioritize flexibility and rapid changeover, operations managers focus on downtime reduction and energy efficiency, and supply chain leaders evaluate how equipment choice affects sourcing and aftermarket service models. Consequently, investment decisions now require integrated evaluation across technical capability, lifecycle serviceability, and supply constraints. This introduction frames the remainder of the report by highlighting the technology’s core strengths, the decision criteria that matter most to buyers, and why the twin screw extruder will remain central to modern continuous processing strategies.
Transformative shifts reshaping the twin screw extruder landscape including technological innovations sustainability trends automation integration and evolving material science applications
The twin screw extruder landscape is experiencing a set of transformative shifts that are reshaping how manufacturers design, procure, and operate processing assets. Advances in screw element metallurgy, surface engineering, and wear-resistant coatings are extending service life and expanding the range of processable materials. At the same time, digital process controls and predictive maintenance algorithms are moving extruders from reactive maintenance regimes into condition-based service models, reducing unplanned downtime and enabling higher overall equipment effectiveness.
Sustainability objectives are prompting process reconfiguration to reduce energy consumption, increase the use of recycled and engineered polymers, and integrate solvent-free reactive processing. These drivers create new performance criteria for extruder selection: the ability to handle high-viscosity recycled streams, precise thermal management to minimize degradation, and flexible screw designs that facilitate rapid product changeovers. Parallel to this, supply chain resiliency concerns and reshoring initiatives are encouraging manufacturers to reconsider sourcing strategies and invest in local aftermarket capabilities. Together, these trends are accelerating convergence between mechanical design innovation and systems-level thinking, compelling cross-functional teams to evaluate extruder investments through the lenses of sustainability, digital readiness, and supply continuity.
Assessment of impacts from United States tariffs in 2025 on twin screw extruder supply chains sourcing strategies and manufacturing decisions
The policy environment in 2025, including tariff adjustments by the United States, has introduced new complexities for companies that source twin screw extruders or rely on globally distributed supply chains for spare parts and service. Tariffs influence the comparative cost of imported machinery and components, compel reassessment of total landed cost, and can change the calculus for choosing between local manufacturing, regional hubs, or centralized production. When tariffs alter input pricing, procurement teams must rapidly re-evaluate supplier qualification, OEM partnerships, and long-term service agreements to preserve operational continuity and cost predictability.
Operational leaders are responding by diversifying supplier bases and by negotiating more robust aftermarket terms to mitigate part lead-time risk. Engineering groups are reassessing up-front specification trade-offs that might reduce dependency on imported, tariff-exposed components. At the same time, facilities planning and capital allocation teams are examining options for nearshoring or dual-sourcing critical spares and subassemblies to maintain uptime. These adjustments require close coordination across commercial, technical, and legal functions, and they underscore the importance of scenario planning: understanding which configurations and sourcing strategies minimize exposure while preserving process performance. In short, tariff-induced disruption has elevated supply chain strategy to a central concern for extruder acquisition and lifecycle management.
Segmentation insights revealing performance differentials across types equipment sizes drive configurations applications and industry verticals to inform development and strategy
Segmentation provides a structured lens to understand where performance gains and commercial opportunities align most closely with customer needs. Based on Type, the market is studied across Co-Rotating and Counter-Rotating, and that distinction clarifies trade-offs in mixing intensity, self-wiping behavior, and throughput for specific applications. Based on Application, the market is studied across Chemical Processing, Feed Processing, Food Processing, Pharmaceutical Processing, and Plastic Processing, with the Plastic Processing segment further studied across Engineering Polymers, Polyolefins, and Pvc; this application-level granularity highlights where material characteristics and regulatory constraints drive specific machine and screw choices.
Based on Equipment Size, the market is studied across 50 To 80 Mm, Greater Than 80 Mm, and Less Than 50 Mm, which informs capital planning and floor-space decisions as well as operator skill requirements. Based on Drive Type, the market is studied across Electric Drive and Hydraulic Drive, a differentiation that matters for energy efficiency, control precision, and maintenance regimes. Based on Industry Vertical, the market is studied across Agriculture, Automotive, Consumer Goods, Healthcare, and Packaging, with Healthcare further studied across Medical Devices and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing; these vertical lenses expose differing expectations for traceability, hygiene, and validation. Together, these segmentation dimensions enable vendors and end users to map technical capability to commercial demand and to prioritize investment in product features and aftermarket services where they will deliver the greatest operational and financial impact.
Regional analysis of demand drivers supply dynamics regulatory influences and considerations spanning Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific
Regional dynamics shape equipment selection criteria, aftermarket service expectations, and adoption speed. In the Americas, purchasers frequently emphasize rapid access to service, energy efficiency, and compliance with established safety and emissions standards; North American manufacturing clusters have concentrated expertise in polymer compounding and automotive components, creating localized expectations for high-torque, flexible extruder platforms. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory frameworks, sustainability mandates, and the prominence of specialty chemical and pharmaceutical processing influence demand for hygienic designs, traceability features, and validated process control packages; vendors operating in these jurisdictions must demonstrate robust documentation and local technical support.
In Asia-Pacific, growth in packaging, consumer goods, and regional polymer manufacturing drives demand for scalable equipment, competitive aftermarket pricing, and rapid installation timelines; OEMs that maintain regional parts distribution and training capability win repeat business more consistently. Currency volatility, regional energy pricing, and logistics infrastructure further differentiate investment decisions across these territories. Understanding these three regional contexts-Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific-helps manufacturers tailor product configurations, spare parts strategies, and service models to meet local operating realities while scaling offerings across global footprints.
Competitive intelligence on strategic positioning technology portfolios partnerships and aftermarket services of leading twin screw extruder manufacturers to inform procurement
Competitive dynamics among twin screw extruder suppliers reflect a mix of technology leadership, aftermarket strength, and strategic partnerships. Market leaders invest in modular architectures that allow rapid reconfiguration of screw trains and barrel sections, enabling customers to adapt lines for new materials without significant capital replacement. Other competitors differentiate through advanced control suites that integrate predictive maintenance, recipe management, and remote diagnostics, reducing lifecycle operating costs and improving first-run yields.
Partnerships with materials suppliers, software vendors, and local service providers are increasingly important to deliver turnkey solutions. Companies that combine field-proven mechanical platforms with strong installation training and spare parts networks gain durable advantages, because downtime risk and operator skill gaps are often the deciding factors in procurement. Additionally, firms that demonstrate clear pathways to improved sustainability-through lower energy consumption, compatibility with recycled feedstocks, or solvent-free processing-are better positioned to win business where corporate environmental targets drive capital approvals. Procurement teams should evaluate suppliers across these dimensions: mechanical robustness, control and analytics capability, aftermarket reach, and sustainability credentials to ensure alignment with both short-term operational needs and longer-term strategic objectives.
Recommendations for industry leaders to optimize operations accelerate innovation mitigate tariff impacts and align supply chain resilience with sustainability priorities
Industry leaders must translate insight into prioritized action to capture performance upside and to mitigate operational risks. First, align engineering specifications with downstream serviceability by selecting configurations that simplify spare parts commonality and reduce specialized maintenance skill requirements. Next, incorporate digital enablement at procurement: require control architectures that support remote diagnostics and standardized data outputs to accelerate troubleshooting and to support advanced analytics initiatives. Additionally, embed sustainability criteria into vendor evaluations, asking for validated energy consumption metrics and demonstrated compatibility with recycled or alternative feedstocks to future-proof production lines.
From a commercial perspective, diversify qualified suppliers for critical subassemblies and high-lead-time components to minimize exposure to geopolitical or tariff-driven disruption. Invest in local training programs to build operator competency and to reduce reliance on external service technicians. Finally, create cross-functional steering groups that bring procurement, engineering, operations, and compliance together early in the capital approval process to ensure equipment selection balances performance, cost, and resilience. Implementing these recommendations will shorten time-to-value, reduce lifecycle risk, and align extruder investments with broader enterprise objectives.
Methodology overview detailing primary and secondary research approaches data validation processes and analytical frameworks used to ensure rigor and reproducibility
The research methodology combines structured primary engagement with targeted secondary analysis to ensure both depth and verification. Primary research included in-depth interviews with technical leaders at processing firms, procurement managers responsible for heavy equipment acquisition, aftermarket service providers, and OEM design engineers to capture first-hand perspectives on performance trade-offs, service expectations, and procurement criteria. These interviews informed issue prioritization and validated hypotheses about operational pain points and adoption barriers.
Secondary research encompassed a systematic review of technical literature, product documentation, regulatory guidance for hygiene and safety, and case studies that illustrate performance outcomes across applications. Analytical frameworks employed scenario analysis to assess how policy shifts and supply disruptions would affect sourcing decisions, while comparative benchmarking evaluated design features such as screw element modularity, drive torque capacity, and control system capabilities. Data validation procedures included triangulation across interview responses, supplier specifications, and field performance reports to ensure conclusions rest on corroborated evidence. This blended approach balances practitioner insight with documented technical information to produce actionable, defensible findings.
Strategic conclusion synthesizing key insights risks opportunities and next steps to support executive decisions about product roadmaps partnerships and transformation
This analysis synthesizes technological, commercial, and regional considerations to provide a cohesive perspective on twin screw extruder deployment and lifecycle management. Technical evolution in screw design, materials, and controls continues to expand the processing envelope, while sustainability mandates and material circularity initiatives push suppliers to innovate toward higher efficiency and feedstock flexibility. Geopolitical developments and tariff policies have elevated supply chain risk to a boardroom-level concern, driving organizations to rethink sourcing strategies and to accelerate investments in local aftermarket capability.
For decision-makers, the critical takeaway is that equipment choice is no longer solely an engineering decision: it is a multifaceted investment that shapes operational resilience, sustainability performance, and long-term cost exposure. By aligning procurement criteria with serviceability, digital readiness, and regional supply realities, organizations can derive superior lifecycle value from extruder investments. Executives should prioritize cross-functional alignment, proactive supplier engagement, and scenario planning to ensure that equipment acquisitions support both near-term production goals and longer-term strategic transformations.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising demand for bio-based and recycled resin compatibility in twin screw extruders for sustainability
- 5.2. Adoption of digital twin technology for predictive maintenance and process optimization in extrusion
- 5.3. Growth of high-speed micro-extrusion applications for medical device tubing and filament production
- 5.4. Increasing use of modular screw configurations to enable rapid changeover across diverse materials
- 5.5. Integration of advanced degassing and venting modules for high-purity polymer compounding processes
- 5.6. Development of energy-efficient barrel heating and cooling systems to reduce operational costs
- 5.7. Expansion of twin screw extruder applications in biodegradable film and packaging material manufacturing
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Type
- 8.1. Co-Rotating
- 8.2. Counter-Rotating
- 9. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Application
- 9.1. Chemical Processing
- 9.2. Feed Processing
- 9.3. Food Processing
- 9.4. Pharmaceutical Processing
- 9.5. Plastic Processing
- 9.5.1. Engineering Polymers
- 9.5.2. Polyolefins
- 9.5.3. Pvc
- 10. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Equipment Size
- 10.1. 50 To 80 Mm
- 10.2. Greater Than 80 Mm
- 10.3. Less Than 50 Mm
- 11. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Drive Type
- 11.1. Electric Drive
- 11.2. Hydraulic Drive
- 12. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Industry Vertical
- 12.1. Agriculture
- 12.2. Automotive
- 12.3. Consumer Goods
- 12.4. Healthcare
- 12.4.1. Medical Devices
- 12.4.2. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
- 12.5. Packaging
- 13. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Twin Screw Extruder Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Coperion GmbH
- 16.3.2. The Japan Steel Works, Ltd.
- 16.3.3. Leistritz AG
- 16.3.4. Bühler AG
- 16.3.5. KraussMaffei Berstorff GmbH
- 16.3.6. Milacron LLC
- 16.3.7. Hosokawa Micron B.V.
- 16.3.8. Davis-Standard LLC
- 16.3.9. Shanghai JWELL Machinery Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Nanjing Giant Extruder Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.11. CLEXTRAL SAS
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
