Tire Recycling Market by Offering (Downstream Products, Services), Recycling Process (Chemical Recycling, Mechanical Recycling, Pyrolysis Process), Tire Type, Size, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Tire Recycling Market was valued at USD 8.84 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 9.25 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.47%, reaching USD 12.84 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the dynamic forces and stakeholder interdependencies reshaping the tire recycling value chain into a resilient circular economy
The global tire recycling landscape is experiencing a defining moment as technology convergence, regulatory evolution, and shifting downstream demand reshape the value chain. This introduction synthesizes the critical forces that are driving industry stakeholders to revisit strategic priorities, from feedstock sourcing to product specification and distribution. By articulating the scope of recycled outputs and the range of processing technologies now achieving commercial scale, the introduction sets a pragmatic context for decision-makers seeking both resilience and growth in circular product systems.
Transitioning from legacy disposal models to resource-efficient reuse and recovery requires clarity about stakeholder roles. Municipalities, fleet operators, original equipment manufacturers, construction firms, material processors, and chemical recyclers each face distinct incentives and constraints. Therefore, the introduction emphasizes the interdependencies across collection logistics, process selection, product standardization, and regulatory compliance. This framing prepares readers for the deeper analysis that follows and underscores why integrated strategies that align feedstock characteristics with end-market specifications are essential for durable commercial outcomes.
How converging technological advances, tightening regulations, and evolving buyer expectations are accelerating the maturation of tire recycling into commercially viable circular supply chains
Recent transformative shifts in the tire recycling landscape reflect accelerated technological maturation, expanded regulatory ambition, and evolving buyer expectations for sustainable inputs. On the technology front, continuous improvements in mechanical devulcanization, targeted catalytic systems for chemical recycling, and optimized pyrolysis configurations have narrowed the performance delta between recycled and virgin materials. As a result, buyers that once reserved recycled content for secondary applications are increasingly validating recycled carbon black, crumb rubber, and engineered fibers for higher-value uses. This technical progress is complemented by a series of commercially driven partnerships that pair feedstock aggregators with processing specialists to secure consistent input quality.
Regulatory drivers have also intensified, with jurisdictions tightening end-of-life tire management requirements and introducing incentives for material recovery and recycled content. This regulatory tightening has prompted infrastructure investment and encouraged product stewardship arrangements that internalize lifecycle costs. Concurrently, demand-side shifts-especially among automotive OEMs and construction specifiers-are creating new premium channels for recycled materials when performance and certification requirements are met. Taken together, these transformative shifts have created a more integrated and commercially viable ecosystem where technology choice, feedstock logistics, and market acceptance converge to determine which processing routes and product formats will scale next.
The 2025 tariff-driven recalibration of cross-border material flows is incentivizing regionalization of processing capacity and driving demand for modular, localized recycling solutions
The imposition of tariffs and trade barriers in 2025 has altered cross-border dynamics for material flows and technology deployments, elevating the importance of localized processing and resilient domestic supply chains. As international arbitrage shrinks, organizations are re-evaluating where they site processing capacity and how they structure raw-material contracts. This recalibration is prompting more investment in modular and scalable facilities that can be deployed closer to high-density feedstock sources, reducing exposure to import volatility and strengthening regional circularity loops.
Consequently, supply chain strategies are shifting toward vertical partnerships and local off-take agreements that prioritize reliability over lowest-cost sourcing. For developers of downstream products, tighter trade controls elevate the strategic premium on process efficiency and product specification consistency, enabling domestic processors to command greater value for quality-assured recycled outputs. In parallel, technology licensors and equipment suppliers are adapting commercial models to support smaller-scale deployments and performance guarantees, recognizing that tariff-driven localization will favor processors that can demonstrate predictable product attributes and cost profiles within regional markets.
A detailed segmentation-driven perspective linking downstream product types, processing technologies, tire feedstock classes, operational scale, and end-user demands to strategic commercialization choices
A granular segmentation of the tire recycling market reveals distinct opportunity pathways driven by offering, processing method, tire type, operational scale, and end-user industry. When viewed through the lens of offering, downstream products and services encompass a bifurcated landscape where commodity outputs such as carbon black, crumb rubber, steel, and tire-derived fuel coexist with engineered materials like fiber and nylon and graded aggregates for construction. Each downstream stream carries different quality specifications and route-to-market dynamics, so companies must align processing choices and quality-control regimes to the intended product application to capture downstream value.
Process-based segmentation underscores how mechanical recycling, chemical recycling, and pyrolysis occupy differentiated roles in the value chain. Within chemical recycling, pathways such as catalytic cracking, depolymerization, hydrolysis, ozonation, and solvent extraction enable molecular recovery but vary in feedstock preconditioning and capital intensity. Mechanical recycling comprises devulcanization, crumb rubber processing, granulation, and shredding, offering pragmatic routes to volume-driven outputs with evolving performance enhancements. Pyrolysis variants-including catalytic pyrolysis, flash pyrolysis, thermal decomposition, and vacuum pyrolysis-deliver energy-dense intermediates and recovered carbon fractions but require rigorous emissions management and product consistency protocols.
Tire type matters because feedstock composition and use cycles influence both processing choice and product suitability. Commercial tires, including heavy-duty and medium-duty vehicle tires, present different wear profiles and material mixes compared with passenger tires, while off-the-road categories such as agricultural, construction, and mining tires introduce size and reinforcement complexity that affect pre-processing and handling. Scale segmentation separates large-scale recycling operations that pursue economies of scale and integrated logistics from small-scale recyclers that can offer agility and niche product specialization. End-user industry segmentation highlights that automotive markets-spanning aftermarket parts and original equipment manufacturing-demand the highest specifications and certification pathways, while construction and infrastructure actors such as building contractors and road construction companies, along with consumer goods manufacturers, provide diversified demand outlets that prioritize cost, durability, and regulatory compliance. Understanding these intersecting segments is essential for aligning technology selection, capital deployment, and commercial go-to-market strategies.
Comparative regional diagnostics revealing how policy environments, infrastructure capacity, and industrial demand are shaping differentiated strategic approaches in three global regions
Regional dynamics are reshaping strategic priorities as differences in regulation, infrastructure, and industrial demand create distinct competitive environments across major global regions. In the Americas, established collection networks and evolving extended producer responsibility frameworks are encouraging consolidation among processors and strengthening links between feedstock suppliers and downstream manufacturers. North and South American jurisdictions show growing appetite for domestic material recovery and product substitution, which is prompting investors to evaluate site selection based on logistics efficiency and proximity to automotive and construction clusters.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, a complex regulatory mosaic and advanced sustainability commitments in many European markets are accelerating adoption of high-performance recycled materials. The result is a fertile environment for technology pilots and certification-driven market entry, while some Middle Eastern and African markets are prioritizing infrastructure upgrades and capacity building to capture value domestically. In the Asia-Pacific region, high volumes of end-of-life tires and rapid industrialization create intense demand for both lower-cost processing and higher-spec materials. Several markets are balancing rapid expansion of mechanical recycling capacities with targeted investments in chemical and pyrolysis technologies, driven by both domestic manufacturing demand and export-oriented value chains. These regional differences require tailored strategies that reflect local policy settings, logistics realities, and buyer sophistication.
How competitive and collaborative strategies among processors, licensors, and end-market integrators are shaping the emergence of differentiated value propositions in tire recycling
Competitive dynamics in tire recycling are defined by a mix of vertically integrated recyclers, technology-specialist licensors, engineering firms, and end-market processors that focus on either commodity outputs or engineered material solutions. Leading players have pursued a range of strategies, including consolidation to capture feedstock throughput, targeted partnerships to secure off-take agreements, and technology licensing arrangements that reduce capital intensity while accelerating geographic expansion. Many companies are investing in quality assurance systems, certification protocols, and laboratory capabilities to meet stricter contracting requirements from automotive and construction specifiers.
Strategic collaborations between material processors and downstream manufacturers have become increasingly common, enabling co-development of product formulations that meet performance thresholds for original equipment and aftermarket applications. At the same time, equipment suppliers and process licensors are adapting commercial terms to support modular plant builds and performance-based contracts. Financial players and industrial conglomerates that recognize the nexus between feedstock security and product margin are beginning to enter the sector, bringing new capital structures and operational discipline. This evolving competitive landscape favors actors that can demonstrate repeatable processing performance, rigorous emissions controls, and proven supply agreements with upstream collectors and downstream end users.
Actionable strategic playbook for industry leaders to align feedstock quality, partnership models, and modular capital deployment for measured and scalable commercialization
Industry leaders should adopt pragmatic, phased strategies that align capital deployment with clear proof points in technology performance, feedstock consistency, and commercial demand. Begin by prioritizing feedstock aggregation and quality control mechanisms that reduce variability and enable direct alignment with downstream product specifications. This focus on upstream consistency will make subsequent investments in high-cost technologies more commercially defensible and will accelerate acceptance by demanding end-users.
Next, pursue strategic partnerships that de-risk early-stage technology deployments. Partnering with material processors, equipment licensors, and end users through off-take agreements and co-investment models enables shared risk and creates defined pathways to scale. Concurrently, invest in robust environmental and emissions monitoring systems to meet tightening regulatory expectations and to provide transparent documentation to buyers. Finally, design modular expansion roadmaps that allow capacity to scale in response to contracted demand, thereby preserving capital flexibility while demonstrating operational capability and product consistency to prospective customers and financiers.
A rigorous, triangulated research methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain diagnostics to align technological feasibility with commercial pathways
The research methodology underpinning this analysis integrates qualitative expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and supply chain diagnostics to build a comprehensive view of the industry’s operational and commercial dynamics. Primary inputs included structured interviews with technology providers, material processors, fleet operators, and construction specifiers to capture firsthand perspectives on processing performance, feedstock constraints, and buyer acceptance criteria. Secondary research incorporated peer-reviewed technical papers, environmental permitting documentation, and product certification standards to validate process characteristics and emissions profiles.
Analytical approaches combined comparative technology assessments, scenario mapping for supply chain resilience, and value-chain deconstruction to identify where value accrues and where bottlenecks persist. Care was taken to cross-validate claims through multiple independent sources and to prioritize recent, verifiable evidence when characterizing technological readiness and regulatory impacts. Throughout the methodology, emphasis was placed on linking technical feasibility to commercial pathways, ensuring that findings are actionable for strategic planning and investment decision-making.
A synthesis of strategic imperatives demonstrating why integrated supply chains, reproducible processing performance, and certification-driven acceptance are essential for long-term viability
In conclusion, the tire recycling sector stands at an inflection point where technological advances, regulatory momentum, and evolving buyer expectations are aligning to create durable commercial pathways for recycled materials. Success will favor organizations that combine disciplined feedstock management, transparent quality systems, and adaptable capital strategies that can respond to regional policy shifts and tariff-driven localization. Integrated partnerships that bridge collectors, processors, technology licensors, and end users will be essential to translate pilot successes into sustained market penetration.
Moving forward, decision-makers should treat the sector as both an industrial challenge and a systems problem: material recovery performance depends not only on processing technology, but on the logistics, contracting, and certification ecosystems that support consistent outputs. By emphasizing repeatability, compliance, and clear commercial routes to market, leaders can convert emerging technical promise into durable business models that deliver environmental benefits alongside competitive returns.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the dynamic forces and stakeholder interdependencies reshaping the tire recycling value chain into a resilient circular economy
The global tire recycling landscape is experiencing a defining moment as technology convergence, regulatory evolution, and shifting downstream demand reshape the value chain. This introduction synthesizes the critical forces that are driving industry stakeholders to revisit strategic priorities, from feedstock sourcing to product specification and distribution. By articulating the scope of recycled outputs and the range of processing technologies now achieving commercial scale, the introduction sets a pragmatic context for decision-makers seeking both resilience and growth in circular product systems.
Transitioning from legacy disposal models to resource-efficient reuse and recovery requires clarity about stakeholder roles. Municipalities, fleet operators, original equipment manufacturers, construction firms, material processors, and chemical recyclers each face distinct incentives and constraints. Therefore, the introduction emphasizes the interdependencies across collection logistics, process selection, product standardization, and regulatory compliance. This framing prepares readers for the deeper analysis that follows and underscores why integrated strategies that align feedstock characteristics with end-market specifications are essential for durable commercial outcomes.
How converging technological advances, tightening regulations, and evolving buyer expectations are accelerating the maturation of tire recycling into commercially viable circular supply chains
Recent transformative shifts in the tire recycling landscape reflect accelerated technological maturation, expanded regulatory ambition, and evolving buyer expectations for sustainable inputs. On the technology front, continuous improvements in mechanical devulcanization, targeted catalytic systems for chemical recycling, and optimized pyrolysis configurations have narrowed the performance delta between recycled and virgin materials. As a result, buyers that once reserved recycled content for secondary applications are increasingly validating recycled carbon black, crumb rubber, and engineered fibers for higher-value uses. This technical progress is complemented by a series of commercially driven partnerships that pair feedstock aggregators with processing specialists to secure consistent input quality.
Regulatory drivers have also intensified, with jurisdictions tightening end-of-life tire management requirements and introducing incentives for material recovery and recycled content. This regulatory tightening has prompted infrastructure investment and encouraged product stewardship arrangements that internalize lifecycle costs. Concurrently, demand-side shifts-especially among automotive OEMs and construction specifiers-are creating new premium channels for recycled materials when performance and certification requirements are met. Taken together, these transformative shifts have created a more integrated and commercially viable ecosystem where technology choice, feedstock logistics, and market acceptance converge to determine which processing routes and product formats will scale next.
The 2025 tariff-driven recalibration of cross-border material flows is incentivizing regionalization of processing capacity and driving demand for modular, localized recycling solutions
The imposition of tariffs and trade barriers in 2025 has altered cross-border dynamics for material flows and technology deployments, elevating the importance of localized processing and resilient domestic supply chains. As international arbitrage shrinks, organizations are re-evaluating where they site processing capacity and how they structure raw-material contracts. This recalibration is prompting more investment in modular and scalable facilities that can be deployed closer to high-density feedstock sources, reducing exposure to import volatility and strengthening regional circularity loops.
Consequently, supply chain strategies are shifting toward vertical partnerships and local off-take agreements that prioritize reliability over lowest-cost sourcing. For developers of downstream products, tighter trade controls elevate the strategic premium on process efficiency and product specification consistency, enabling domestic processors to command greater value for quality-assured recycled outputs. In parallel, technology licensors and equipment suppliers are adapting commercial models to support smaller-scale deployments and performance guarantees, recognizing that tariff-driven localization will favor processors that can demonstrate predictable product attributes and cost profiles within regional markets.
A detailed segmentation-driven perspective linking downstream product types, processing technologies, tire feedstock classes, operational scale, and end-user demands to strategic commercialization choices
A granular segmentation of the tire recycling market reveals distinct opportunity pathways driven by offering, processing method, tire type, operational scale, and end-user industry. When viewed through the lens of offering, downstream products and services encompass a bifurcated landscape where commodity outputs such as carbon black, crumb rubber, steel, and tire-derived fuel coexist with engineered materials like fiber and nylon and graded aggregates for construction. Each downstream stream carries different quality specifications and route-to-market dynamics, so companies must align processing choices and quality-control regimes to the intended product application to capture downstream value.
Process-based segmentation underscores how mechanical recycling, chemical recycling, and pyrolysis occupy differentiated roles in the value chain. Within chemical recycling, pathways such as catalytic cracking, depolymerization, hydrolysis, ozonation, and solvent extraction enable molecular recovery but vary in feedstock preconditioning and capital intensity. Mechanical recycling comprises devulcanization, crumb rubber processing, granulation, and shredding, offering pragmatic routes to volume-driven outputs with evolving performance enhancements. Pyrolysis variants-including catalytic pyrolysis, flash pyrolysis, thermal decomposition, and vacuum pyrolysis-deliver energy-dense intermediates and recovered carbon fractions but require rigorous emissions management and product consistency protocols.
Tire type matters because feedstock composition and use cycles influence both processing choice and product suitability. Commercial tires, including heavy-duty and medium-duty vehicle tires, present different wear profiles and material mixes compared with passenger tires, while off-the-road categories such as agricultural, construction, and mining tires introduce size and reinforcement complexity that affect pre-processing and handling. Scale segmentation separates large-scale recycling operations that pursue economies of scale and integrated logistics from small-scale recyclers that can offer agility and niche product specialization. End-user industry segmentation highlights that automotive markets-spanning aftermarket parts and original equipment manufacturing-demand the highest specifications and certification pathways, while construction and infrastructure actors such as building contractors and road construction companies, along with consumer goods manufacturers, provide diversified demand outlets that prioritize cost, durability, and regulatory compliance. Understanding these intersecting segments is essential for aligning technology selection, capital deployment, and commercial go-to-market strategies.
Comparative regional diagnostics revealing how policy environments, infrastructure capacity, and industrial demand are shaping differentiated strategic approaches in three global regions
Regional dynamics are reshaping strategic priorities as differences in regulation, infrastructure, and industrial demand create distinct competitive environments across major global regions. In the Americas, established collection networks and evolving extended producer responsibility frameworks are encouraging consolidation among processors and strengthening links between feedstock suppliers and downstream manufacturers. North and South American jurisdictions show growing appetite for domestic material recovery and product substitution, which is prompting investors to evaluate site selection based on logistics efficiency and proximity to automotive and construction clusters.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, a complex regulatory mosaic and advanced sustainability commitments in many European markets are accelerating adoption of high-performance recycled materials. The result is a fertile environment for technology pilots and certification-driven market entry, while some Middle Eastern and African markets are prioritizing infrastructure upgrades and capacity building to capture value domestically. In the Asia-Pacific region, high volumes of end-of-life tires and rapid industrialization create intense demand for both lower-cost processing and higher-spec materials. Several markets are balancing rapid expansion of mechanical recycling capacities with targeted investments in chemical and pyrolysis technologies, driven by both domestic manufacturing demand and export-oriented value chains. These regional differences require tailored strategies that reflect local policy settings, logistics realities, and buyer sophistication.
How competitive and collaborative strategies among processors, licensors, and end-market integrators are shaping the emergence of differentiated value propositions in tire recycling
Competitive dynamics in tire recycling are defined by a mix of vertically integrated recyclers, technology-specialist licensors, engineering firms, and end-market processors that focus on either commodity outputs or engineered material solutions. Leading players have pursued a range of strategies, including consolidation to capture feedstock throughput, targeted partnerships to secure off-take agreements, and technology licensing arrangements that reduce capital intensity while accelerating geographic expansion. Many companies are investing in quality assurance systems, certification protocols, and laboratory capabilities to meet stricter contracting requirements from automotive and construction specifiers.
Strategic collaborations between material processors and downstream manufacturers have become increasingly common, enabling co-development of product formulations that meet performance thresholds for original equipment and aftermarket applications. At the same time, equipment suppliers and process licensors are adapting commercial terms to support modular plant builds and performance-based contracts. Financial players and industrial conglomerates that recognize the nexus between feedstock security and product margin are beginning to enter the sector, bringing new capital structures and operational discipline. This evolving competitive landscape favors actors that can demonstrate repeatable processing performance, rigorous emissions controls, and proven supply agreements with upstream collectors and downstream end users.
Actionable strategic playbook for industry leaders to align feedstock quality, partnership models, and modular capital deployment for measured and scalable commercialization
Industry leaders should adopt pragmatic, phased strategies that align capital deployment with clear proof points in technology performance, feedstock consistency, and commercial demand. Begin by prioritizing feedstock aggregation and quality control mechanisms that reduce variability and enable direct alignment with downstream product specifications. This focus on upstream consistency will make subsequent investments in high-cost technologies more commercially defensible and will accelerate acceptance by demanding end-users.
Next, pursue strategic partnerships that de-risk early-stage technology deployments. Partnering with material processors, equipment licensors, and end users through off-take agreements and co-investment models enables shared risk and creates defined pathways to scale. Concurrently, invest in robust environmental and emissions monitoring systems to meet tightening regulatory expectations and to provide transparent documentation to buyers. Finally, design modular expansion roadmaps that allow capacity to scale in response to contracted demand, thereby preserving capital flexibility while demonstrating operational capability and product consistency to prospective customers and financiers.
A rigorous, triangulated research methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain diagnostics to align technological feasibility with commercial pathways
The research methodology underpinning this analysis integrates qualitative expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and supply chain diagnostics to build a comprehensive view of the industry’s operational and commercial dynamics. Primary inputs included structured interviews with technology providers, material processors, fleet operators, and construction specifiers to capture firsthand perspectives on processing performance, feedstock constraints, and buyer acceptance criteria. Secondary research incorporated peer-reviewed technical papers, environmental permitting documentation, and product certification standards to validate process characteristics and emissions profiles.
Analytical approaches combined comparative technology assessments, scenario mapping for supply chain resilience, and value-chain deconstruction to identify where value accrues and where bottlenecks persist. Care was taken to cross-validate claims through multiple independent sources and to prioritize recent, verifiable evidence when characterizing technological readiness and regulatory impacts. Throughout the methodology, emphasis was placed on linking technical feasibility to commercial pathways, ensuring that findings are actionable for strategic planning and investment decision-making.
A synthesis of strategic imperatives demonstrating why integrated supply chains, reproducible processing performance, and certification-driven acceptance are essential for long-term viability
In conclusion, the tire recycling sector stands at an inflection point where technological advances, regulatory momentum, and evolving buyer expectations are aligning to create durable commercial pathways for recycled materials. Success will favor organizations that combine disciplined feedstock management, transparent quality systems, and adaptable capital strategies that can respond to regional policy shifts and tariff-driven localization. Integrated partnerships that bridge collectors, processors, technology licensors, and end users will be essential to translate pilot successes into sustained market penetration.
Moving forward, decision-makers should treat the sector as both an industrial challenge and a systems problem: material recovery performance depends not only on processing technology, but on the logistics, contracting, and certification ecosystems that support consistent outputs. By emphasizing repeatability, compliance, and clear commercial routes to market, leaders can convert emerging technical promise into durable business models that deliver environmental benefits alongside competitive returns.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
192 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Tire Recycling Market, by Offering
- 8.1. Downstream Products
- 8.1.1. Carbon Black
- 8.1.2. Crumb Rubber
- 8.1.3. Fiber & Nylon
- 8.1.4. Steel
- 8.1.5. Tire-Derived Aggregate
- 8.1.6. Tire-Derived Fuel
- 8.2. Services
- 9. Tire Recycling Market, by Recycling Process
- 9.1. Chemical Recycling
- 9.1.1. Catalytic Cracking
- 9.1.2. Depolymerization
- 9.1.3. Hydrolysis
- 9.1.4. Ozonation
- 9.1.5. Solvent Extraction
- 9.2. Mechanical Recycling
- 9.2.1. Crumb Rubber Process
- 9.2.2. Devulcanization
- 9.2.3. Granulation
- 9.2.4. Shredding
- 9.3. Pyrolysis Process
- 9.3.1. Catalytic Pyrolysis
- 9.3.2. Flash Pyrolysis
- 9.3.3. Thermal Decomposition
- 9.3.4. Vacuum Pyrolysis
- 10. Tire Recycling Market, by Tire Type
- 10.1. Commercial Tires
- 10.1.1. Heavy-Duty Vehicles
- 10.1.2. Medium-Duty Vehicles
- 10.2. Off-The-Road (OTR) Tires
- 10.2.1. Agricultural Tires
- 10.2.2. Construction Tires
- 10.2.3. Mining Tires
- 10.3. Passenger Tires
- 11. Tire Recycling Market, by Size
- 11.1. Large-Scale Recycling
- 11.2. Small-Scale Recycling
- 12. Tire Recycling Market, by End User Industry
- 12.1. Automotive
- 12.1.1. Aftermarket Parts
- 12.1.2. Original Equipment Manufacturers
- 12.2. Construction & Infrastructure
- 12.2.1. Building Contractors
- 12.2.2. Road Construction Companies
- 12.3. Consumer Goods
- 13. Tire Recycling Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Tire Recycling Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Tire Recycling Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. United States Tire Recycling Market
- 17. China Tire Recycling Market
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 18.5. BDS Tire Recycling, Inc
- 18.6. Bridgestone Corporation
- 18.7. Champlin Tire Recycling, Inc
- 18.8. CIRCTEC
- 18.9. CONTEC S.A.
- 18.10. Continental AG
- 18.11. CRM
- 18.12. Emanuel Tire, LLC
- 18.13. Entech Inc.
- 18.14. Environmental Waste International
- 18.15. FBS Tire Recycling, Inc.
- 18.16. GENAN HOLDING A/S
- 18.17. Green Distillation Technologies Corporation Limited
- 18.18. GRP Limited
- 18.19. Indo Green Enviro Pvt Ltd
- 18.20. Kargro Group
- 18.21. Klean Industries Inc.
- 18.22. Kokubu Shokai Co., Ltd
- 18.23. Liberty Tire Recycling, LLC
- 18.24. MATEC Inc.
- 18.25. Michelin Group
- 18.26. Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
- 18.27. National Tyre Recovery Ltd
- 18.28. reRubber, LLC
- 18.29. Tinna Rubber and Infrastructure Limited
- 18.30. TIRES S.p.A.
- 18.31. Tyre Recycling Solutions SA
- 18.32. Tyrecycle by ResourceCo Pty Ltd.
- 18.33. Wastefront AS
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
