Thermoplastic Tapes Market by Product Type (Double Sided, Single Sided), Material Type (Polyester, Polyethylene, Polypropylene), Adhesive Type, Backing Type, Thickness, Width, End Use Industry, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Thermoplastic Tapes Market was valued at USD 2.86 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.12 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.98%, reaching USD 5.70 billion by 2032.
An orienting overview of thermoplastic tape types, performance attributes, and strategic importance across manufacturing and assembly environments
Thermoplastic tapes are integral to a wide range of modern manufacturing and assembly processes, where adhesion performance, material compatibility, and application-specific properties determine product reliability and cost efficiency. This executive summary introduces the landscape of double sided and single sided tape solutions that serve diverse end markets from automotive assembly to medical device fabrication. The introduction frames the product family in terms of backing substrates and adhesive chemistries, while situating key performance attributes such as dielectric strength, temperature resistance, tack, and removability within the decision criteria used by procurement and engineering teams.
As manufacturing complexity increases and regulatory expectations evolve, material selection and application engineering for thermoplastic tapes are becoming strategic levers rather than simple component choices. The introduction therefore highlights prevailing drivers including substrate innovation, adhesive formulation advances, and the cross‑sector migration of tape solutions into new use cases. By establishing this baseline, readers gain a clear orientation to subsequent sections that examine structural shifts across supply chains, tariff impacts, segmentation priorities, regional behaviors, competitive dynamics, recommended actions, and the research approach used to develop these insights.
A concise analysis of how material innovation, supply chain realignment, and application complexity are reshaping thermoplastic tape demand and procurement behavior
The thermoplastic tape landscape is experiencing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, regulatory, and supply dynamics. Innovations in backing materials such as advanced films, engineered foils, and thin‑gauge tissues are enabling adhesives to perform under higher temperatures and in more demanding chemical environments. Concurrently, adhesive chemistry progress-particularly in acrylic and silicone systems-has expanded usable temperature ranges and improved long‑term adhesion on low‑surface‑energy polymers. These material advances are coupled with growing emphasis on sustainability, which is prompting suppliers to explore lower‑emission production methods, recyclable backings, and formulations that reduce volatile components.
Supply chain realignments are another key inflection point. Manufacturers are increasingly optimizing procurement strategies to shorten lead times and reduce single‑supply dependencies, which in turn influences the adoption of local or regional suppliers and the willingness of buyers to qualify alternative backing types and adhesive systems. Application‑level complexity is rising as tape use broadens into coil winding insulation, catheter securing, and surface protection for high‑value finishes. As a result, cross‑functional teams in engineering, procurement, and quality are elevating tape specification from a commodity exercise to a coordinated sourcing and performance validation process. This shift rewards suppliers that provide demonstrable technical support, application testing, and certification assistance.
An exploration of how tariff shifts affecting polymer and intermediate imports are prompting near‑sourcing, supplier qualification changes, and greater provenance focus
Recent tariff movements affecting imported polymeric materials and intermediate goods have altered procurement calculus for companies reliant on global inputs. Tariff actions have increased scrutiny on origin points for polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, and PTFE raw materials, prompting downstream manufacturers to reassess sourcing strategies and inventory buffer practices. In response, some firms have accelerated qualification of alternative suppliers, diversified material sourcing geographically, and increased collaborative engagement with backing and adhesive producers to validate substitute formulations under regulated use cases.
These adjustments have had downstream effects on product development timelines and approval cycles, particularly among highly regulated end markets such as medical devices and automotive components. Regulatory documentation and traceability demands are now considered alongside cost and lead time when selecting materials. Production planners are placing greater emphasis on supplier transparency around provenance and compliance, so that changes in tariff policy can be navigated with minimal disruption to assembly lines and contractual obligations. In sum, tariff-driven shifts have catalyzed supplier consolidation in some regions, heightened interest in near‑sourcing, and incentivized investments in material innovation that mitigate exposure to cross‑border cost volatility.
A layered segmentation perspective linking product construction, material properties, adhesive chemistry, backing type, and dimensional attributes to application suitability
Segmentation analysis reveals where product performance, application demands, and procurement priorities intersect across the thermoplastic tape landscape. Product differentiation between double sided and single sided constructions shapes use cases: double sided formats are prioritized where permanent bonding and low-profile assemblies are needed, while single sided tapes are selected for masking, surface protection, and insulation tasks where one‑sided adhesion and removability are essential. Material type drives core properties; backing substrates such as polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, and PTFE define tensile strength, flexibility, dielectric performance, and chemical resistance, and these characteristics in turn influence suitability for specific end uses.
End use segmentation-spanning automotive, construction, electrical and electronics, medical, and packaging-clarifies performance expectations and regulatory pressures unique to each vertical. Application segmentation further refines requirements: electrical insulation applications are distinguished between coil winding and insulation uses with different dielectric and thermal stability needs; masking applications are bifurcated into auto OEM and DIY contexts that demand different adhesion profiles and residue behaviors; medical applications include catheter securing and surgical draping where biocompatibility and sterility are paramount; packaging use divides into case sealing and strapping functions with distinct tensile and sealing characteristics; surface protection covers painting protection and scratch prevention, each requiring varying conformability and removability. Adhesive chemistry segmentation across acrylic, rubber, and silicone adhesives determines temperature resistance, initial tack, and aging behavior, while backing type segmentation across cloth, film, foil, paper, and tissue influences conformability, breathability, and mechanical strength. Thickness and width segmentations, covering bands from less than 50 microns to more than 200 microns and widths from less than 25 millimetres to more than 100 millimetres, are critical for specifying handling properties, winding compatibility, and application machinery requirements. These intersecting segmentation lenses inform qualification protocols, supplier selection, and inventory planning across product lines.
A regional analysis showing how logistical priorities, regulatory rigor, and manufacturing density drive distinct procurement and innovation behaviors across global markets
Regional behaviors demonstrate differentiated priorities that influence procurement strategies, supplier networks, and innovation pathways. In the Americas, buyers exhibit a strong focus on logistical reliability and supplier responsiveness to support high‑mix manufacturing environments; there is notable demand for solutions that facilitate faster changeover, on‑site support, and documentation supporting regulatory compliance. This region also sees interest in locally sourced inputs to reduce exposure to cross‑border tariff and freight volatility.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, sustainability mandates, and long production lifecycles shape tape specifications. Companies in this region often require extensive material declarations, recyclability considerations, and life‑cycle data, which elevates the role of certification and supplier transparency. The Asia‑Pacific region is characterized by a dense manufacturing footprint and rapid adoption of new polymer backings and adhesive systems; cost sensitivity is balanced by a willingness to integrate novel materials when they demonstrate clear assembly or performance advantages. Across regions, local standards, workforce skill profiles, and capital intensity of end industries drive distinct expectations for testing support, on‑site technical services, and co‑development programs.
A market dynamics assessment identifying how vertical integration, co‑development, and targeted specialization are determining competitive advantage in the tape sector
Competitive dynamics in the thermoplastic tape space are shaped by a combination of material science expertise, application engineering services, and supply chain resilience. Leading producers differentiate through vertically integrated capabilities that permit tighter control over backing production, adhesive formulation, and coating processes, enabling tailored solutions for complex applications such as coil winding insulation and medical device securing. Strategic partnerships between backing manufacturers and adhesive formulators are becoming more common as customers seek single‑source technical accountability and faster time to qualification.
Innovation is increasingly delivered through collaborative programs with OEMs and converters to co‑develop product variants that meet niche performance or regulatory needs. Companies that invest in application laboratories, joint testing programs, and demonstrable certifications gain competitive advantage by shortening qualification cycles and reducing perceived risk for buyers. At the same time, smaller specialised suppliers compete on agility, customization, and targeted expertise in segments such as surgical draping or high‑performance PTFE backed solutions. Observed behaviors include consolidation among mid‑tier suppliers seeking scale benefits, targeted M&A aimed at acquiring niche adhesive technologies, and broader portfolio strategies to cover both commodity packaging tapes and high‑value, specification‑driven applications.
A practical roadmap recommending R&D priorities, supply diversification, co‑development programs, and portfolio alignment to strengthen commercial resilience and differentiation
To capture value and mitigate medium‑term disruption, industry leaders should pursue an integrated set of actions that combine technical differentiation with supply chain robustness. First, prioritize investments in adhesive and backing R&D that directly address application pain points-such as improved low‑surface‑energy adhesion, reduced outgassing for electronics, or enhanced biocompatibility for medical uses-while maintaining a roadmap for sustainability improvements. This dual focus on performance and environmental credentials will position providers favorably with procurement and regulatory stakeholders.
Second, strengthen supplier and customer collaboration by offering co‑development programs, comprehensive testing services, and transparent provenance documentation that reduce qualification friction. Third, diversify sourcing strategies by qualifying regional suppliers and establishing safety stock protocols to reduce vulnerability to tariff shifts and shipping disruptions. Fourth, optimize portfolio segmentation by aligning product offerings-ranging from ultra‑thin film backings to heavy‑duty cloth tapes-with targeted sales and technical support resources so that high‑value applications receive prioritized engineering input. Finally, enhance commercial offerings with modular licensing and service options, such as training for assembly line teams and post‑sale technical support, to increase switching costs and advance customer loyalty. Collectively, these actions can increase resilience and create differentiation grounded in demonstrable technical capability.
A transparent description of the mixed‑methods research framework using primary stakeholder engagement, technical validation, and secondary material and regulatory analysis
The research approach combines primary engagement with supply‑side and demand‑side stakeholders alongside rigorous secondary analysis of technical literature, regulatory sources, and industry reporting. Primary research involved structured interviews with adhesive formulators, backing manufacturers, converters, and end‑user engineers, supplemented by application trials and lab validation where possible. These qualitative inputs were used to validate product classification logic, identify key performance criteria across applications, and surface practical adoption barriers such as qualification lead times and residue concerns in masking applications.
Secondary research included review of material safety data, product technical data sheets, patent filings, and regulatory guidance relevant to medical, electrical, and automotive applications. Data triangulation ensured that observed market behaviors were corroborated across multiple sources, and methodological rigor was achieved by documenting interview protocols, sampling rationales, and criteria for selecting technical references. The research also incorporated scenario planning to evaluate the operational implications of supply chain shocks and tariff changes, with emphasis on actionable insights that can inform procurement, product development, and regulatory compliance strategies. Transparency around limitations and assumptions was maintained throughout so that users can adapt findings to their specific operational contexts.
A synthesis emphasizing how aligned R&D investments, supplier transparency, and targeted commercialization will convert disruption into competitive advantage
In conclusion, the thermoplastic tape sector is at an inflection point where material innovation, application complexity, and shifting trade dynamics converge to create both challenges and opportunities. Backing substrate evolution and adhesive chemistry advancements are opening new application possibilities, while tariff and supply chain pressures are accelerating the need for regional sourcing strategies and greater supplier transparency. Segmentation across product type, material, end use, application, adhesive chemistry, backing, thickness, and width provides a robust framework for aligning product development and commercial approaches to specific customer needs.
Companies that combine technical investment with supply chain agility and customer‑centric co‑development practices will be best positioned to capture emerging opportunities and reduce exposure to external disruption. Emphasizing rigorous testing, clear documentation, and targeted portfolio management enables faster qualification and stronger value propositions for high‑stakes applications such as medical devices and electrical insulation. Overall, a disciplined approach to innovation, procurement, and commercialization will help industry players transform current pressures into durable competitive advantages.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An orienting overview of thermoplastic tape types, performance attributes, and strategic importance across manufacturing and assembly environments
Thermoplastic tapes are integral to a wide range of modern manufacturing and assembly processes, where adhesion performance, material compatibility, and application-specific properties determine product reliability and cost efficiency. This executive summary introduces the landscape of double sided and single sided tape solutions that serve diverse end markets from automotive assembly to medical device fabrication. The introduction frames the product family in terms of backing substrates and adhesive chemistries, while situating key performance attributes such as dielectric strength, temperature resistance, tack, and removability within the decision criteria used by procurement and engineering teams.
As manufacturing complexity increases and regulatory expectations evolve, material selection and application engineering for thermoplastic tapes are becoming strategic levers rather than simple component choices. The introduction therefore highlights prevailing drivers including substrate innovation, adhesive formulation advances, and the cross‑sector migration of tape solutions into new use cases. By establishing this baseline, readers gain a clear orientation to subsequent sections that examine structural shifts across supply chains, tariff impacts, segmentation priorities, regional behaviors, competitive dynamics, recommended actions, and the research approach used to develop these insights.
A concise analysis of how material innovation, supply chain realignment, and application complexity are reshaping thermoplastic tape demand and procurement behavior
The thermoplastic tape landscape is experiencing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, regulatory, and supply dynamics. Innovations in backing materials such as advanced films, engineered foils, and thin‑gauge tissues are enabling adhesives to perform under higher temperatures and in more demanding chemical environments. Concurrently, adhesive chemistry progress-particularly in acrylic and silicone systems-has expanded usable temperature ranges and improved long‑term adhesion on low‑surface‑energy polymers. These material advances are coupled with growing emphasis on sustainability, which is prompting suppliers to explore lower‑emission production methods, recyclable backings, and formulations that reduce volatile components.
Supply chain realignments are another key inflection point. Manufacturers are increasingly optimizing procurement strategies to shorten lead times and reduce single‑supply dependencies, which in turn influences the adoption of local or regional suppliers and the willingness of buyers to qualify alternative backing types and adhesive systems. Application‑level complexity is rising as tape use broadens into coil winding insulation, catheter securing, and surface protection for high‑value finishes. As a result, cross‑functional teams in engineering, procurement, and quality are elevating tape specification from a commodity exercise to a coordinated sourcing and performance validation process. This shift rewards suppliers that provide demonstrable technical support, application testing, and certification assistance.
An exploration of how tariff shifts affecting polymer and intermediate imports are prompting near‑sourcing, supplier qualification changes, and greater provenance focus
Recent tariff movements affecting imported polymeric materials and intermediate goods have altered procurement calculus for companies reliant on global inputs. Tariff actions have increased scrutiny on origin points for polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, and PTFE raw materials, prompting downstream manufacturers to reassess sourcing strategies and inventory buffer practices. In response, some firms have accelerated qualification of alternative suppliers, diversified material sourcing geographically, and increased collaborative engagement with backing and adhesive producers to validate substitute formulations under regulated use cases.
These adjustments have had downstream effects on product development timelines and approval cycles, particularly among highly regulated end markets such as medical devices and automotive components. Regulatory documentation and traceability demands are now considered alongside cost and lead time when selecting materials. Production planners are placing greater emphasis on supplier transparency around provenance and compliance, so that changes in tariff policy can be navigated with minimal disruption to assembly lines and contractual obligations. In sum, tariff-driven shifts have catalyzed supplier consolidation in some regions, heightened interest in near‑sourcing, and incentivized investments in material innovation that mitigate exposure to cross‑border cost volatility.
A layered segmentation perspective linking product construction, material properties, adhesive chemistry, backing type, and dimensional attributes to application suitability
Segmentation analysis reveals where product performance, application demands, and procurement priorities intersect across the thermoplastic tape landscape. Product differentiation between double sided and single sided constructions shapes use cases: double sided formats are prioritized where permanent bonding and low-profile assemblies are needed, while single sided tapes are selected for masking, surface protection, and insulation tasks where one‑sided adhesion and removability are essential. Material type drives core properties; backing substrates such as polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, and PTFE define tensile strength, flexibility, dielectric performance, and chemical resistance, and these characteristics in turn influence suitability for specific end uses.
End use segmentation-spanning automotive, construction, electrical and electronics, medical, and packaging-clarifies performance expectations and regulatory pressures unique to each vertical. Application segmentation further refines requirements: electrical insulation applications are distinguished between coil winding and insulation uses with different dielectric and thermal stability needs; masking applications are bifurcated into auto OEM and DIY contexts that demand different adhesion profiles and residue behaviors; medical applications include catheter securing and surgical draping where biocompatibility and sterility are paramount; packaging use divides into case sealing and strapping functions with distinct tensile and sealing characteristics; surface protection covers painting protection and scratch prevention, each requiring varying conformability and removability. Adhesive chemistry segmentation across acrylic, rubber, and silicone adhesives determines temperature resistance, initial tack, and aging behavior, while backing type segmentation across cloth, film, foil, paper, and tissue influences conformability, breathability, and mechanical strength. Thickness and width segmentations, covering bands from less than 50 microns to more than 200 microns and widths from less than 25 millimetres to more than 100 millimetres, are critical for specifying handling properties, winding compatibility, and application machinery requirements. These intersecting segmentation lenses inform qualification protocols, supplier selection, and inventory planning across product lines.
A regional analysis showing how logistical priorities, regulatory rigor, and manufacturing density drive distinct procurement and innovation behaviors across global markets
Regional behaviors demonstrate differentiated priorities that influence procurement strategies, supplier networks, and innovation pathways. In the Americas, buyers exhibit a strong focus on logistical reliability and supplier responsiveness to support high‑mix manufacturing environments; there is notable demand for solutions that facilitate faster changeover, on‑site support, and documentation supporting regulatory compliance. This region also sees interest in locally sourced inputs to reduce exposure to cross‑border tariff and freight volatility.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, sustainability mandates, and long production lifecycles shape tape specifications. Companies in this region often require extensive material declarations, recyclability considerations, and life‑cycle data, which elevates the role of certification and supplier transparency. The Asia‑Pacific region is characterized by a dense manufacturing footprint and rapid adoption of new polymer backings and adhesive systems; cost sensitivity is balanced by a willingness to integrate novel materials when they demonstrate clear assembly or performance advantages. Across regions, local standards, workforce skill profiles, and capital intensity of end industries drive distinct expectations for testing support, on‑site technical services, and co‑development programs.
A market dynamics assessment identifying how vertical integration, co‑development, and targeted specialization are determining competitive advantage in the tape sector
Competitive dynamics in the thermoplastic tape space are shaped by a combination of material science expertise, application engineering services, and supply chain resilience. Leading producers differentiate through vertically integrated capabilities that permit tighter control over backing production, adhesive formulation, and coating processes, enabling tailored solutions for complex applications such as coil winding insulation and medical device securing. Strategic partnerships between backing manufacturers and adhesive formulators are becoming more common as customers seek single‑source technical accountability and faster time to qualification.
Innovation is increasingly delivered through collaborative programs with OEMs and converters to co‑develop product variants that meet niche performance or regulatory needs. Companies that invest in application laboratories, joint testing programs, and demonstrable certifications gain competitive advantage by shortening qualification cycles and reducing perceived risk for buyers. At the same time, smaller specialised suppliers compete on agility, customization, and targeted expertise in segments such as surgical draping or high‑performance PTFE backed solutions. Observed behaviors include consolidation among mid‑tier suppliers seeking scale benefits, targeted M&A aimed at acquiring niche adhesive technologies, and broader portfolio strategies to cover both commodity packaging tapes and high‑value, specification‑driven applications.
A practical roadmap recommending R&D priorities, supply diversification, co‑development programs, and portfolio alignment to strengthen commercial resilience and differentiation
To capture value and mitigate medium‑term disruption, industry leaders should pursue an integrated set of actions that combine technical differentiation with supply chain robustness. First, prioritize investments in adhesive and backing R&D that directly address application pain points-such as improved low‑surface‑energy adhesion, reduced outgassing for electronics, or enhanced biocompatibility for medical uses-while maintaining a roadmap for sustainability improvements. This dual focus on performance and environmental credentials will position providers favorably with procurement and regulatory stakeholders.
Second, strengthen supplier and customer collaboration by offering co‑development programs, comprehensive testing services, and transparent provenance documentation that reduce qualification friction. Third, diversify sourcing strategies by qualifying regional suppliers and establishing safety stock protocols to reduce vulnerability to tariff shifts and shipping disruptions. Fourth, optimize portfolio segmentation by aligning product offerings-ranging from ultra‑thin film backings to heavy‑duty cloth tapes-with targeted sales and technical support resources so that high‑value applications receive prioritized engineering input. Finally, enhance commercial offerings with modular licensing and service options, such as training for assembly line teams and post‑sale technical support, to increase switching costs and advance customer loyalty. Collectively, these actions can increase resilience and create differentiation grounded in demonstrable technical capability.
A transparent description of the mixed‑methods research framework using primary stakeholder engagement, technical validation, and secondary material and regulatory analysis
The research approach combines primary engagement with supply‑side and demand‑side stakeholders alongside rigorous secondary analysis of technical literature, regulatory sources, and industry reporting. Primary research involved structured interviews with adhesive formulators, backing manufacturers, converters, and end‑user engineers, supplemented by application trials and lab validation where possible. These qualitative inputs were used to validate product classification logic, identify key performance criteria across applications, and surface practical adoption barriers such as qualification lead times and residue concerns in masking applications.
Secondary research included review of material safety data, product technical data sheets, patent filings, and regulatory guidance relevant to medical, electrical, and automotive applications. Data triangulation ensured that observed market behaviors were corroborated across multiple sources, and methodological rigor was achieved by documenting interview protocols, sampling rationales, and criteria for selecting technical references. The research also incorporated scenario planning to evaluate the operational implications of supply chain shocks and tariff changes, with emphasis on actionable insights that can inform procurement, product development, and regulatory compliance strategies. Transparency around limitations and assumptions was maintained throughout so that users can adapt findings to their specific operational contexts.
A synthesis emphasizing how aligned R&D investments, supplier transparency, and targeted commercialization will convert disruption into competitive advantage
In conclusion, the thermoplastic tape sector is at an inflection point where material innovation, application complexity, and shifting trade dynamics converge to create both challenges and opportunities. Backing substrate evolution and adhesive chemistry advancements are opening new application possibilities, while tariff and supply chain pressures are accelerating the need for regional sourcing strategies and greater supplier transparency. Segmentation across product type, material, end use, application, adhesive chemistry, backing, thickness, and width provides a robust framework for aligning product development and commercial approaches to specific customer needs.
Companies that combine technical investment with supply chain agility and customer‑centric co‑development practices will be best positioned to capture emerging opportunities and reduce exposure to external disruption. Emphasizing rigorous testing, clear documentation, and targeted portfolio management enables faster qualification and stronger value propositions for high‑stakes applications such as medical devices and electrical insulation. Overall, a disciplined approach to innovation, procurement, and commercialization will help industry players transform current pressures into durable competitive advantages.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of electrically conductive thermoplastic tapes in electric vehicle battery management systems
- 5.2. Development of flame-retardant thermoplastic adhesive tapes for aerospace lightweighting initiatives
- 5.3. Adoption of color-matched thermoplastic laminating tapes in consumer electronics for seamless device assembly
- 5.4. Innovations in bio-based thermoplastic tape formulations targeting sustainable packaging applications
- 5.5. Advancements in UV-curable thermoplastic tapes for rapid curing industrial adhesive processes
- 5.6. Scaling production of high-performance thermoplastic tapes with enhanced peel strength under extreme temperatures
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Double Sided
- 8.2. Single Sided
- 9. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Material Type
- 9.1. Polyester
- 9.2. Polyethylene
- 9.3. Polypropylene
- 9.4. Polyvinyl Chloride
- 9.5. PTFE
- 10. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Adhesive Type
- 10.1. Acrylic
- 10.2. Rubber
- 10.3. Silicone
- 11. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Backing Type
- 11.1. Cloth
- 11.2. Film
- 11.3. Foil
- 11.4. Paper
- 11.5. Tissue
- 12. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Thickness
- 12.1. 100 To 200 Microns
- 12.2. 50 To 100 Microns
- 12.3. Less Than 50 Microns
- 12.4. More Than 200 Microns
- 13. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Width
- 13.1. 25 To 50 Millimetres
- 13.2. 50 To 100 Millimetres
- 13.3. Less Than 25 Millimetres
- 13.4. More Than 100 Millimetres
- 14. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by End Use Industry
- 14.1. Automotive
- 14.2. Construction
- 14.3. Electrical & Electronics
- 14.4. Medical
- 14.5. Packaging
- 15. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Application
- 15.1. Electrical Insulation
- 15.1.1. Coil Winding
- 15.1.2. Insulation
- 15.2. Masking
- 15.2.1. Auto OEM
- 15.2.2. DIY
- 15.3. Medical
- 15.3.1. Catheter Securing
- 15.3.2. Surgical Draping
- 15.4. Packaging
- 15.4.1. Case Sealing
- 15.4.2. Strapping
- 15.5. Surface Protection
- 15.5.1. Painting Protection
- 15.5.2. Scratch Prevention
- 16. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Region
- 16.1. Americas
- 16.1.1. North America
- 16.1.2. Latin America
- 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 16.2.1. Europe
- 16.2.2. Middle East
- 16.2.3. Africa
- 16.3. Asia-Pacific
- 17. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Group
- 17.1. ASEAN
- 17.2. GCC
- 17.3. European Union
- 17.4. BRICS
- 17.5. G7
- 17.6. NATO
- 18. Thermoplastic Tapes Market, by Country
- 18.1. United States
- 18.2. Canada
- 18.3. Mexico
- 18.4. Brazil
- 18.5. United Kingdom
- 18.6. Germany
- 18.7. France
- 18.8. Russia
- 18.9. Italy
- 18.10. Spain
- 18.11. China
- 18.12. India
- 18.13. Japan
- 18.14. Australia
- 18.15. South Korea
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 19.3. Competitive Analysis
- 19.3.1. Arkema Group
- 19.3.2. Ashland Inc.
- 19.3.3. Avient Corporation
- 19.3.4. Berry Global Inc.
- 19.3.5. CompTape B.V
- 19.3.6. Covestro AG BY Stratasys
- 19.3.7. DSM
- 19.3.8. Essentra plc.
- 19.3.9. Evonik Industries AG
- 19.3.10. FLEXcon Company Inc.
- 19.3.11. H.B. Fuller Company
- 19.3.12. Intertape Polymer Group Inc. BY Clearlake Capital
- 19.3.13. Lamart Corp.
- 19.3.14. Maru Hachi Corporation
- 19.3.15. Merck KGaA
- 19.3.16. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- 19.3.17. PPM Industries SpA.
- 19.3.18. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 19.3.19. SGL Carbon BY Resistotech Industries
- 19.3.20. Solvay S.A.
- 19.3.21. Suprem SA
- 19.3.22. TEIJIN LIMITED
- 19.3.23. tesa Tapes (India) Private Limited
- 19.3.24. Toray Advanced Composites
- 19.3.25. Von Roll Holding AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
