Thermoplastic Pipes Market by Product Type (CPVC, HDPE, PB), Wall Type (Multilayer, Single Layer, Structured Wall), Diameter Range, Pressure Rating, Application, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Thermoplastic Pipes Market was valued at USD 72.75 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 76.12 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.62%, reaching USD 104.43 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the thermoplastic pipes sector outlining innovation, infrastructure drivers, regulatory shifts, and the evolving supplier–buyer relationship
The thermoplastic pipes industry sits at the intersection of material science innovation, infrastructure renewal imperatives, and shifting regulatory expectations, creating a landscape of opportunity and complexity for manufacturers, specifiers, and end users. In recent years polymer formulations, extrusion technologies, and jointing systems have matured rapidly, enhancing the mechanical performance, longevity, and installation efficiency of products across municipal, industrial, and residential applications. At the same time, aging infrastructure in many developed markets and rapid service expansion in developing regions have elevated demand for durable, corrosion-resistant, and low-maintenance piping solutions that reduce lifecycle costs and operational disruptions.
Regulatory drivers and sustainability priorities are reshaping procurement criteria, with circularity considerations and chemical safety standards increasingly influencing material choice and qualification pathways. Procurement teams are balancing upfront capital outlay against total cost of ownership, with a stronger emphasis on leak prevention, asset resilience, and compatibility with digital monitoring systems. Consequently, supplier relationships are evolving beyond transactional supply into technical partnerships that support specification development, on-site training, and warranty frameworks. As the sector continues to professionalize, stakeholders who invest in product differentiation, installation best practices, and aligned after-market services will be positioned to capture greater value from infrastructure and retrofit programs worldwide.
How material breakthroughs, regulatory tightening, and digital asset management are reshaping thermoplastic pipe selection, supply chains, and long-term value creation
The landscape for thermoplastic pipes is experiencing transformative shifts driven by materials innovation, heightened environmental scrutiny, and the integration of digital technologies into asset management. New polymer blends and stabilized formulations have lengthened service horizons while enabling lighter-weight systems that reduce logistical cost and installation time. Concurrently, standards bodies and regulators are tightening specifications for chemical resistance, fire performance, and recyclability, which prompts manufacturers to re-evaluate formulations and certification pathways. These regulatory adjustments are not uniform globally, however, creating a patchwork of compliance requirements that can redirect manufacturing footprints and influence regional supply chains.
Technological convergence is also altering market dynamics: sensors and smart jointing systems are being specified alongside pipes for critical water and gas applications to enable proactive maintenance and leakage detection. This convergence is fostering partnerships between material suppliers, system integrators, and analytics providers, and is redefining value propositions toward lifecycle-service offerings rather than discrete product sales. Finally, capital flows into infrastructure resilience and climate adaptation projects are shifting demand patterns, with an emphasis on materials that can withstand variable hydrological and thermal stresses. As a result, competitive differentiation increasingly rests on R&D depth, quality assurance programs, and the ability to demonstrate long-term performance and environmental credentials.
Assessment of the layered and systemic effects of United States tariff measures introduced in 2025 and their influence on procurement, sourcing, and manufacturing strategies
United States tariff policy enacted in 2025 introduced a new set of considerations that have rippled across procurement strategies, supplier selection, and near-term project economics. Tariff measures tightened the cost calculus for imports of specific polymer grades and finished pipe assemblies, prompting buyers to re-evaluate source country preferences and to accelerate qualification of local or regional suppliers when feasible. In response, many manufacturers adjusted commercial terms, restructured supply agreements, and revisited production footprints to mitigate tariff exposure. For projects with fixed budgets, procurement teams turned toward alternative specifications or material substitutions to preserve program timelines and compliance without compromising functional requirements.
The cumulative impact of tariffs extended beyond direct cost effects: lead times and inventory policies were recalibrated to buffer against tariff-driven price volatility, and longer-term contracting strategies increasingly included tariff escalation clauses and capacity reservation commitments. Additionally, distributors and fabricators that could demonstrate domestic value-add or downstream assembly were able to preserve competitiveness by offering tariff-advantaged configurations. In parallel, engineering teams intensified scrutiny of design-to-cost opportunities, including shifts among polymer types and jointing methods that maintain performance while limiting tariff exposure. Overall, policy changes emphasized the importance of flexible supply chain design and strengthened the business case for localized manufacturing and strategic stock placement.
Integrated segmentation insights showing how product type, wall construction, diameter, pressure classification, application nuances, and end-use drive specification and demand
A granular view of the market requires attention to how product, construction, dimensional range, operational pressure, application context, and end-use segment interact to shape demand patterns and technical requirements. Product type differentiation spans CPVC, HDPE, PB, PPR, and PVC, where HDPE itself is distinguished by PE100 and PE80 variants and PVC is differentiated into flexible and rigid formats; each material pathway brings distinct performance attributes and qualification challenges that determine suitability for potable systems, aggressive chemical environments, or gas distribution. In parallel, wall type options such as multilayer constructions, single layer extrusions, and structured wall formats influence bending radius, insulation capability, and installation speed, thereby affecting contractor preferences and system-level economics.
Dimensional considerations across large, medium, and small diameter ranges drive application suitability from municipal transmission mains to small-bore service lines, while pressure rating classifications of high, medium, and low pressure guide selection for gas distribution, water supply, or drainage duties. Application-specific subdivisions further refine technical requirements: gas distribution applications divide into LPG and natural gas paths with different regulatory and jointing needs; industrial uses span chemical process piping and oil and gas service with heightened compatibility and safety protocols; irrigation applications split between agricultural and landscape irrigation with varying exposure to UV and abrasion; sewer and drainage differentiate sanitary sewers from stormwater drains with differing slope and sediment-handling characteristics; and water supply splits into potable and nonpotable services with strict material and certification demands. Finally, end-use distinctions across commercial, industrial, municipal, OEM, and residential buyers influence procurement scale, specification rigor, and service expectations, prompting suppliers to tailor product portfolios and support models to each buyer archetype.
Regional dynamics and strategic implications for manufacturing, certification, and supply chain configuration across key global markets and economic regions
Regional performance and strategic priorities differ markedly, reflecting infrastructure maturity, regulatory regimes, and capital flows across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, legacy infrastructure replacement, combined with strong municipal investment programs, elevates demand for corrosion-resistant materials and long-durability systems, while private sector projects emphasize cost-effective modular solutions and rapid installation. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory emphasis on environmental performance and circularity drives certification-focused procurement and innovation in recyclable formulations, whereas the Middle East’s energy-related infrastructure presents distinct requirements for hydrocarbon handling and high-temperature stability. Asia-Pacific dynamics are shaped by rapid urbanization and large-scale water management projects, fostering demand across a broad range of diameters and pressure classes and incentivizing local manufacturing scale-up.
Supply chain architectures also vary: regional manufacturing hubs, trade policy, and access to polymer feedstocks influence where capacity is sited and how quickly suppliers can respond to project cycles. Cross-border trade flows and local content requirements amplify the importance of logistical agility, regulatory alignment, and partnership networks. As a consequence, strategic decisions about where to expand capacity, how to structure distribution channels, and which value-added services to offer must be calibrated to region-specific procurement norms, certification landscapes, and the trajectory of public investment programs.
Competitive landscape analysis emphasizing the strategic levers, partnership models, and capability investments that distinguish leading thermoplastic pipe companies
Competitive dynamics within the thermoplastic pipe sector are shaped by a mix of global producers, regional specialists, raw material suppliers, and engineered solution providers, each bringing different strengths in R&D, distribution reach, and value-added services. Market leaders tend to differentiate through a combination of materials science capabilities, rigorous quality control systems, and integrated service offerings that include design support, installation training, and extended warranty options. Regional players often compete on responsiveness, localized certification knowledge, and cost-competitive manufacturing footprints that capitalize on proximity advantages and tariff mitigation.
Strategic collaboration is increasingly common: suppliers enter partnerships with analytics firms to bundle asset-monitoring services, with coating and joining technology providers to improve installation outcomes, and with local fabricators to meet content requirements. Investment priorities for leading companies include product certification programs, recycled-material integration, and factory automation to reduce unit costs and improve consistency. At the same time, players with strong channel networks and contractor engagement programs can accelerate specification uptake by demonstrating on-site benefits and total cost of ownership improvements. Overall, success hinges on combining technical credibility with commercial agility and demonstrated ability to meet evolving regulatory and sustainability standards.
Actionable strategic priorities for manufacturers and suppliers to strengthen innovation, supply chain resilience, and customer-focused service offerings in a changing market
Industry leaders must adopt an integrated strategy that blends product innovation, supply chain resilience, and customer-centric service to capture emerging opportunities and manage risk. First, prioritize research and development that targets enhanced material stability, recyclability, and joint integrity to align product roadmaps with tightening regulatory and environmental expectations. Second, diversify sourcing and production footprints to reduce tariff and trade exposure, including nearshoring where feasible and investing in strategic inventory placement to smooth project delivery. Third, expand after-sales and lifecycle services, offering asset-monitoring packages, predictive maintenance support, and installation training to shift value propositions from commodity supply to outcome-based solutions.
In addition, strengthen cross-functional collaboration between commercial, engineering, and regulatory teams to accelerate product qualification and reduce time-to-specification for major projects. Engage proactively with standards bodies and procurement agencies to shape pragmatic certification pathways that allow for innovation without compromising safety. Finally, invest in transparent sustainability reporting and traceability systems to meet buyer expectations and to facilitate circularity initiatives in raw material sourcing and end-of-life recovery. By pursuing these measures, companies can improve margin resilience, deepen customer relationships, and support long-term market positioning in a rapidly evolving sector.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical source synthesis, and scenario validation to produce actionable insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to create a robust evidence base and to validate conclusions through multiple perspectives. Primary engagement included structured interviews with procurement leads, specification engineers, installation contractors, OEM partners, and regulatory officials to capture practical selection criteria, operational constraints, and certification pain points. Secondary research encompassed standards documentation, patent landscapes, materials science literature, trade policy records, and public infrastructure program descriptions to contextualize market drivers and technology trajectories.
Findings were triangulated through cross-referencing supplier disclosures, product technical datasheets, and independent testing reports where available, while scenario analysis was used to stress-test the implications of policy shifts and supply interruptions. Care was taken to adjust for regional regulatory heterogeneity and to reflect diverging application requirements across water, gas, industrial, and agricultural domains. The approach emphasized transparency in source attribution and methodological limitations, and prioritized actionable insights that are grounded in practitioner experience and verifiable technical data.
Concluding synthesis of strategic implications highlighting innovation, regulation, and collaborative approaches needed to realize durable and sustainable infrastructure outcomes
In conclusion, the thermoplastic pipes sector is positioned at a strategic inflection point where material innovation, regulatory pressures, and evolving procurement models jointly shape opportunity and risk. Suppliers that combine advanced polymer development, rigorous certification strategies, and service-oriented business models will be best placed to capture long-duration contracts and to influence specification outcomes. Meanwhile, buyers and specifiers benefit from clearer evaluation frameworks that balance upfront cost with lifecycle performance, environmental impact, and installation efficiency.
Policy changes and regional dynamics underscore the need for adaptable supply chain architectures and close collaboration between manufacturers, fabricators, and buyers. As the industry adapts, the emphasis on demonstrable performance, sustainability credentials, and integrated digital monitoring will continue to grow, rewarding players that can evidence long-term value and reliability. Ultimately, realizing the full potential of thermoplastic piping solutions requires coordinated efforts across innovation, standardization, and market engagement to ensure safe, cost-effective, and resilient infrastructure outcomes.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the thermoplastic pipes sector outlining innovation, infrastructure drivers, regulatory shifts, and the evolving supplier–buyer relationship
The thermoplastic pipes industry sits at the intersection of material science innovation, infrastructure renewal imperatives, and shifting regulatory expectations, creating a landscape of opportunity and complexity for manufacturers, specifiers, and end users. In recent years polymer formulations, extrusion technologies, and jointing systems have matured rapidly, enhancing the mechanical performance, longevity, and installation efficiency of products across municipal, industrial, and residential applications. At the same time, aging infrastructure in many developed markets and rapid service expansion in developing regions have elevated demand for durable, corrosion-resistant, and low-maintenance piping solutions that reduce lifecycle costs and operational disruptions.
Regulatory drivers and sustainability priorities are reshaping procurement criteria, with circularity considerations and chemical safety standards increasingly influencing material choice and qualification pathways. Procurement teams are balancing upfront capital outlay against total cost of ownership, with a stronger emphasis on leak prevention, asset resilience, and compatibility with digital monitoring systems. Consequently, supplier relationships are evolving beyond transactional supply into technical partnerships that support specification development, on-site training, and warranty frameworks. As the sector continues to professionalize, stakeholders who invest in product differentiation, installation best practices, and aligned after-market services will be positioned to capture greater value from infrastructure and retrofit programs worldwide.
How material breakthroughs, regulatory tightening, and digital asset management are reshaping thermoplastic pipe selection, supply chains, and long-term value creation
The landscape for thermoplastic pipes is experiencing transformative shifts driven by materials innovation, heightened environmental scrutiny, and the integration of digital technologies into asset management. New polymer blends and stabilized formulations have lengthened service horizons while enabling lighter-weight systems that reduce logistical cost and installation time. Concurrently, standards bodies and regulators are tightening specifications for chemical resistance, fire performance, and recyclability, which prompts manufacturers to re-evaluate formulations and certification pathways. These regulatory adjustments are not uniform globally, however, creating a patchwork of compliance requirements that can redirect manufacturing footprints and influence regional supply chains.
Technological convergence is also altering market dynamics: sensors and smart jointing systems are being specified alongside pipes for critical water and gas applications to enable proactive maintenance and leakage detection. This convergence is fostering partnerships between material suppliers, system integrators, and analytics providers, and is redefining value propositions toward lifecycle-service offerings rather than discrete product sales. Finally, capital flows into infrastructure resilience and climate adaptation projects are shifting demand patterns, with an emphasis on materials that can withstand variable hydrological and thermal stresses. As a result, competitive differentiation increasingly rests on R&D depth, quality assurance programs, and the ability to demonstrate long-term performance and environmental credentials.
Assessment of the layered and systemic effects of United States tariff measures introduced in 2025 and their influence on procurement, sourcing, and manufacturing strategies
United States tariff policy enacted in 2025 introduced a new set of considerations that have rippled across procurement strategies, supplier selection, and near-term project economics. Tariff measures tightened the cost calculus for imports of specific polymer grades and finished pipe assemblies, prompting buyers to re-evaluate source country preferences and to accelerate qualification of local or regional suppliers when feasible. In response, many manufacturers adjusted commercial terms, restructured supply agreements, and revisited production footprints to mitigate tariff exposure. For projects with fixed budgets, procurement teams turned toward alternative specifications or material substitutions to preserve program timelines and compliance without compromising functional requirements.
The cumulative impact of tariffs extended beyond direct cost effects: lead times and inventory policies were recalibrated to buffer against tariff-driven price volatility, and longer-term contracting strategies increasingly included tariff escalation clauses and capacity reservation commitments. Additionally, distributors and fabricators that could demonstrate domestic value-add or downstream assembly were able to preserve competitiveness by offering tariff-advantaged configurations. In parallel, engineering teams intensified scrutiny of design-to-cost opportunities, including shifts among polymer types and jointing methods that maintain performance while limiting tariff exposure. Overall, policy changes emphasized the importance of flexible supply chain design and strengthened the business case for localized manufacturing and strategic stock placement.
Integrated segmentation insights showing how product type, wall construction, diameter, pressure classification, application nuances, and end-use drive specification and demand
A granular view of the market requires attention to how product, construction, dimensional range, operational pressure, application context, and end-use segment interact to shape demand patterns and technical requirements. Product type differentiation spans CPVC, HDPE, PB, PPR, and PVC, where HDPE itself is distinguished by PE100 and PE80 variants and PVC is differentiated into flexible and rigid formats; each material pathway brings distinct performance attributes and qualification challenges that determine suitability for potable systems, aggressive chemical environments, or gas distribution. In parallel, wall type options such as multilayer constructions, single layer extrusions, and structured wall formats influence bending radius, insulation capability, and installation speed, thereby affecting contractor preferences and system-level economics.
Dimensional considerations across large, medium, and small diameter ranges drive application suitability from municipal transmission mains to small-bore service lines, while pressure rating classifications of high, medium, and low pressure guide selection for gas distribution, water supply, or drainage duties. Application-specific subdivisions further refine technical requirements: gas distribution applications divide into LPG and natural gas paths with different regulatory and jointing needs; industrial uses span chemical process piping and oil and gas service with heightened compatibility and safety protocols; irrigation applications split between agricultural and landscape irrigation with varying exposure to UV and abrasion; sewer and drainage differentiate sanitary sewers from stormwater drains with differing slope and sediment-handling characteristics; and water supply splits into potable and nonpotable services with strict material and certification demands. Finally, end-use distinctions across commercial, industrial, municipal, OEM, and residential buyers influence procurement scale, specification rigor, and service expectations, prompting suppliers to tailor product portfolios and support models to each buyer archetype.
Regional dynamics and strategic implications for manufacturing, certification, and supply chain configuration across key global markets and economic regions
Regional performance and strategic priorities differ markedly, reflecting infrastructure maturity, regulatory regimes, and capital flows across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, legacy infrastructure replacement, combined with strong municipal investment programs, elevates demand for corrosion-resistant materials and long-durability systems, while private sector projects emphasize cost-effective modular solutions and rapid installation. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory emphasis on environmental performance and circularity drives certification-focused procurement and innovation in recyclable formulations, whereas the Middle East’s energy-related infrastructure presents distinct requirements for hydrocarbon handling and high-temperature stability. Asia-Pacific dynamics are shaped by rapid urbanization and large-scale water management projects, fostering demand across a broad range of diameters and pressure classes and incentivizing local manufacturing scale-up.
Supply chain architectures also vary: regional manufacturing hubs, trade policy, and access to polymer feedstocks influence where capacity is sited and how quickly suppliers can respond to project cycles. Cross-border trade flows and local content requirements amplify the importance of logistical agility, regulatory alignment, and partnership networks. As a consequence, strategic decisions about where to expand capacity, how to structure distribution channels, and which value-added services to offer must be calibrated to region-specific procurement norms, certification landscapes, and the trajectory of public investment programs.
Competitive landscape analysis emphasizing the strategic levers, partnership models, and capability investments that distinguish leading thermoplastic pipe companies
Competitive dynamics within the thermoplastic pipe sector are shaped by a mix of global producers, regional specialists, raw material suppliers, and engineered solution providers, each bringing different strengths in R&D, distribution reach, and value-added services. Market leaders tend to differentiate through a combination of materials science capabilities, rigorous quality control systems, and integrated service offerings that include design support, installation training, and extended warranty options. Regional players often compete on responsiveness, localized certification knowledge, and cost-competitive manufacturing footprints that capitalize on proximity advantages and tariff mitigation.
Strategic collaboration is increasingly common: suppliers enter partnerships with analytics firms to bundle asset-monitoring services, with coating and joining technology providers to improve installation outcomes, and with local fabricators to meet content requirements. Investment priorities for leading companies include product certification programs, recycled-material integration, and factory automation to reduce unit costs and improve consistency. At the same time, players with strong channel networks and contractor engagement programs can accelerate specification uptake by demonstrating on-site benefits and total cost of ownership improvements. Overall, success hinges on combining technical credibility with commercial agility and demonstrated ability to meet evolving regulatory and sustainability standards.
Actionable strategic priorities for manufacturers and suppliers to strengthen innovation, supply chain resilience, and customer-focused service offerings in a changing market
Industry leaders must adopt an integrated strategy that blends product innovation, supply chain resilience, and customer-centric service to capture emerging opportunities and manage risk. First, prioritize research and development that targets enhanced material stability, recyclability, and joint integrity to align product roadmaps with tightening regulatory and environmental expectations. Second, diversify sourcing and production footprints to reduce tariff and trade exposure, including nearshoring where feasible and investing in strategic inventory placement to smooth project delivery. Third, expand after-sales and lifecycle services, offering asset-monitoring packages, predictive maintenance support, and installation training to shift value propositions from commodity supply to outcome-based solutions.
In addition, strengthen cross-functional collaboration between commercial, engineering, and regulatory teams to accelerate product qualification and reduce time-to-specification for major projects. Engage proactively with standards bodies and procurement agencies to shape pragmatic certification pathways that allow for innovation without compromising safety. Finally, invest in transparent sustainability reporting and traceability systems to meet buyer expectations and to facilitate circularity initiatives in raw material sourcing and end-of-life recovery. By pursuing these measures, companies can improve margin resilience, deepen customer relationships, and support long-term market positioning in a rapidly evolving sector.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical source synthesis, and scenario validation to produce actionable insights
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to create a robust evidence base and to validate conclusions through multiple perspectives. Primary engagement included structured interviews with procurement leads, specification engineers, installation contractors, OEM partners, and regulatory officials to capture practical selection criteria, operational constraints, and certification pain points. Secondary research encompassed standards documentation, patent landscapes, materials science literature, trade policy records, and public infrastructure program descriptions to contextualize market drivers and technology trajectories.
Findings were triangulated through cross-referencing supplier disclosures, product technical datasheets, and independent testing reports where available, while scenario analysis was used to stress-test the implications of policy shifts and supply interruptions. Care was taken to adjust for regional regulatory heterogeneity and to reflect diverging application requirements across water, gas, industrial, and agricultural domains. The approach emphasized transparency in source attribution and methodological limitations, and prioritized actionable insights that are grounded in practitioner experience and verifiable technical data.
Concluding synthesis of strategic implications highlighting innovation, regulation, and collaborative approaches needed to realize durable and sustainable infrastructure outcomes
In conclusion, the thermoplastic pipes sector is positioned at a strategic inflection point where material innovation, regulatory pressures, and evolving procurement models jointly shape opportunity and risk. Suppliers that combine advanced polymer development, rigorous certification strategies, and service-oriented business models will be best placed to capture long-duration contracts and to influence specification outcomes. Meanwhile, buyers and specifiers benefit from clearer evaluation frameworks that balance upfront cost with lifecycle performance, environmental impact, and installation efficiency.
Policy changes and regional dynamics underscore the need for adaptable supply chain architectures and close collaboration between manufacturers, fabricators, and buyers. As the industry adapts, the emphasis on demonstrable performance, sustainability credentials, and integrated digital monitoring will continue to grow, rewarding players that can evidence long-term value and reliability. Ultimately, realizing the full potential of thermoplastic piping solutions requires coordinated efforts across innovation, standardization, and market engagement to ensure safe, cost-effective, and resilient infrastructure outcomes.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of bio-based thermoplastic compounds for sustainable water infrastructure
- 5.2. Integration of smart sensor technology in thermoplastic pipe systems for real-time monitoring
- 5.3. Shift towards high-density polyethylene pipes in oil and gas pipelines to enhance corrosion resistance
- 5.4. Rapid growth in composite thermoplastic liners for rehabilitation of aging underground sewer networks
- 5.5. Increasing demand for flame-retardant PVC pipes in construction to meet stringent safety regulations
- 5.6. Rising influence of circular economy initiatives on recycling and reprocessing of thermoplastic pipe waste
- 5.7. Technological advancements in multilayer coextrusion processes for enhanced chemical resistance in thermoplastic pipes
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. CPVC
- 8.2. HDPE
- 8.2.1. PE100
- 8.2.2. PE80
- 8.3. PB
- 8.4. PPR
- 8.5. PVC
- 8.5.1. Flexible PVC
- 8.5.2. Rigid PVC
- 9. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Wall Type
- 9.1. Multilayer
- 9.2. Single Layer
- 9.3. Structured Wall
- 10. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Diameter Range
- 10.1. Large Diameter
- 10.2. Medium Diameter
- 10.3. Small Diameter
- 11. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Pressure Rating
- 11.1. High Pressure
- 11.2. Low Pressure
- 11.3. Medium Pressure
- 12. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Application
- 12.1. Gas Distribution
- 12.1.1. LPG
- 12.1.2. Natural Gas
- 12.2. Industrial
- 12.2.1. Chemical Process
- 12.2.2. Oil And Gas
- 12.3. Irrigation
- 12.3.1. Agricultural
- 12.3.2. Landscape
- 12.4. Sewer And Drainage
- 12.4.1. Sanitary Sewers
- 12.4.2. Stormwater Drains
- 12.5. Water Supply
- 12.5.1. Non Potable Water
- 12.5.2. Potable Water
- 13. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by End Use
- 13.1. Commercial
- 13.2. Industrial
- 13.3. Municipal
- 13.4. OEM
- 13.5. Residential
- 14. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Thermoplastic Pipes Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.2. Aliaxis
- 17.3.3. Astral Limited
- 17.3.4. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company
- 17.3.5. Finolex Industries Limited
- 17.3.6. Future Pipe Industries
- 17.3.7. Georg Fischer Ltd.
- 17.3.8. IPEX Inc.
- 17.3.9. JM Eagle
- 17.3.10. LG Chem Ltd.
- 17.3.11. National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
- 17.3.12. Prysmian Group
- 17.3.13. SABIC
- 17.3.14. Strohm GmbH
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
