Textile Composites Market by Resin Type (Epoxy, Polyester, Vinyl Ester), Fiber Type (Aramid Fiber, Carbon Fiber, Glass Fiber), Composite Type, Form, Manufacturing Process, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Textile Composites Market was valued at USD 6.57 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.04 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.23%, reaching USD 11.49 billion by 2032.
An informed introduction to textile composites highlighting material diversity, manufacturing convergence, and the strategic imperative for integrative adoption across industries
Textile composites have matured from niche engineering curiosities into foundational materials across multiple high-performance sectors. Advances in fiber technologies, resin chemistries, and automated textile architectures have combined to broaden application envelopes, improve manufacturability, and reduce per-unit production variability. As materials science converges with digital manufacturing, the industry now faces a pivotal moment where design freedoms and cost considerations must be balanced with regulatory and supply-chain realities.
Stakeholders from aerospace engineers to infrastructure planners increasingly rely on textile composites for weight reduction, corrosion resistance, and lifecycle performance. These materials are not monolithic; they range from woven carbon architectures tailored for stiffness to non-woven glass constructions optimized for impact absorption. Consequently, decision-makers must integrate material selection early in the product development cycle to fully realize the benefits these fabrics offer.
Transitioning from conventional substrates to textile composites requires intentional changes in qualification protocols, supplier relationships, and production strategies. As a result, the industry is evolving from proof-of-concept trials to scaled implementation, with cross-functional teams aligning around standardized testing, certification pathways, and robust manufacturing controls. This report provides a concise but comprehensive foundation for leaders preparing to operationalize textile composite solutions within their portfolios.
Transformative technological, supply-chain, and regulatory shifts are converging to redefine how textile composites are developed, sourced, and scaled across end markets
The landscape for textile composites is being reshaped by convergent technological, regulatory, and commercial forces. Fiber innovation and resin system advances have extended performance boundaries while additive and automated textile processes have increased repeatability and throughput. These technological shifts enable designers to rethink component architectures, integrating multi-material strategies that balance performance with cost and manufacturability.
Concurrently, supply-chain reconfiguration and heightened attention to lifecycle impacts are prompting manufacturers to reassess sourcing strategies and material circularity. Sustainable resin chemistries and recyclability pathways are moving from academic research into early commercial pilots, influencing procurement criteria as organizations aim to reduce embodied carbon and improve end-of-life outcomes. Moreover, digitization across the value chain-driven by simulation, digital twins, and real-time quality monitoring-has accelerated adoption curves by lowering technical risk and enabling predictive process control.
Regulatory and customer-driven performance expectations are also driving transformation. As safety standards evolve and performance requirements become more prescriptive, product teams must integrate compliance thinking into early design workstreams. Ultimately, these shifts are creating new competitive dynamics where companies that combine material innovation with manufacturing intelligence will capture early advantages in both legacy and emerging application areas.
How United States tariff actions in 2025 are reshaping procurement architectures, supplier strategies, and manufacturing resilience across textile composite supply chains
New tariff measures implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced a material shift in procurement strategies and cost structures for organizations that rely on imported textile composite inputs. Trade policy adjustments have increased the emphasis on regional supplier diversification, nearshoring, and vertical integration as firms seek to mitigate exposure to duty-driven cost volatility. Buyers and manufacturers are responding by reassessing supplier contracts, qualifying alternative feedstocks, and exploring domestic processing capabilities to preserve margin and delivery reliability.
These trade dynamics have a cascading effect across product roadmaps and inventory strategies. Capital allocation decisions increasingly incorporate tariff sensitivity as firms weigh the merits of buffering inventory against investing in local capacity. At the operational level, procurement teams are collaborating more closely with engineering to identify technically equivalent materials that carry lower trade risk, while legal and compliance functions monitor evolving policy interpretations and exemptions.
Over time, the tariff environment is accelerating structural shifts that were already underway: investments in domestic fabrication capabilities, closer partnerships with regional fiber producers, and reconfiguration of global logistics networks. Organizations that proactively adapt procurement architectures and build flexible sourcing playbooks will be better positioned to maintain cost competitiveness and supply continuity in a trade environment that remains dynamic.
Detailed segmentation-driven insights connecting end-use requirements, resin and fiber choices, textile architectures, form factors, and manufacturing pathways for strategic decision-making
Segmentation analysis reveals where technical requirements and commercial dynamics intersect to create differentiated opportunities across the textile composites value chain. Based on End Use Industry, market is studied across Aerospace And Defense, Automotive, Construction And Infrastructure, Marine, Sports And Recreational, and Wind Energy. The Aerospace And Defense is further studied across Commercial Aircraft, Military Aircraft, and Spacecraft. The Automotive is further studied across Aftermarket and Oem. Each end-use category imposes distinct regulatory, performance, and certification obligations that influence material selection, with aerospace demanding rigorous qualification and automotive prioritizing cost and cycle time for high-volume applications.
Based on Resin Type, market is studied across Epoxy, Polyester, and Vinyl Ester. Epoxy systems typically address high-performance needs such as fatigue resistance and elevated temperature capability, whereas polyester and vinyl ester systems are often selected for cost-efficient, corrosion-resistant solutions in infrastructure and marine contexts. Material engineers must balance resin chemistry with processing constraints and end-use durability expectations to achieve optimal life-cycle outcomes.
Based on Fiber Type, market is studied across Aramid Fiber, Carbon Fiber, and Glass Fiber. Carbon fibers deliver superior stiffness-to-weight metrics favored in aerospace and high-end sporting goods, aramid fibers offer impact resistance used in defense and ballistic applications, and glass fibers provide cost-effective versatility for marine, construction, and wind applications. The selection among these fibers is driven by performance targets, cost envelopes, and manufacturability.
Based on Composite Type, market is studied across Braided, Knitted, Non Woven, Quilted, and Woven. Each textile architecture creates unique load paths and failure modes, which in turn affect design certification strategies and tooling choices. Designers often pair textile architecture to resin systems and manufacturing methods to tailor properties such as through-thickness strength and conformity to compound geometries.
Based on Form, market is studied across Chopped, Laminates, Prepreg, and Tow. Forms influence downstream processing choices and supply logistics; for example, prepregs enable consistent resin distribution but require cold-chain management, while chopped forms offer flexibility for molding at the expense of directional reinforcement. Finally, based on Manufacturing Process, market is studied across Compression Molding, Filament Winding, Hand Lay Up, Pultrusion, and Resin Transfer Molding. Each manufacturing route carries distinct cycle-time, tooling, and capital intensity implications that affect total cost of ownership and scalability. Understanding how these segmentation layers interrelate is essential for aligning material selection with production strategy and application performance requirements.
Regional competitive dynamics across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence sourcing, sustainability priorities, and manufacturing investment strategies
Regional dynamics are shaping competitive positioning and investment priorities across textile composites. The Americas region has a strong industrial base with advanced aerospace, automotive, and wind energy clusters that favor high-performance carbon and hybrid solutions. Localized production capacity, coupled with policy shifts and logistics considerations, is prompting firms in this region to invest in vertical integration and supplier partnerships to reduce exposure to cross-border trade fluctuations.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where stringent environmental regulations and a focus on decarbonization influence material and process selection. European OEMs and infrastructure developers increasingly evaluate recyclability and embodied carbon, driving interest in recyclable thermoset alternatives and process innovations aimed at reducing waste. The Middle East shows growing interest in marine and construction applications that leverage glass fiber systems for corrosion resistance, while North Africa is emerging as a potential manufacturing node due to cost and proximity to European markets.
Asia-Pacific remains a crucial hub for both upstream fiber production and downstream manufacturing. It combines large-scale glass and carbon fiber capacity with an expanding base of specialized textile mills and automated composite manufacturers. Investment in digital manufacturing and process automation is accelerating, enabling higher-volume adoption across automotive and consumer sports segments. Taken together, regional strengths shape supply-chain strategies, innovation priorities, and partnership models for companies seeking to scale textile composite adoption globally.
Corporate strategic moves across materials innovation, manufacturing automation, and cross-industry partnerships that are shaping competitive advantage in textile composites
Major companies operating within the textile composites ecosystem are pursuing differentiated strategies across technology development, vertical integration, and market-facing partnerships. Leading material suppliers are focusing on advanced fiber chemistries and novel sizing technologies that improve interfacial bonding and enable higher-performing laminates. These efforts complement resin formulators who are advancing tougher, lower-viscosity systems that support automated impregnation and faster cure cycles.
At the manufacturing tier, composite fabricators are investing in automation, in-line inspection, and digital process control to reduce variability and compress time to qualification. Strategic collaborations between textile producers, resin companies, and OEMs are increasingly common, structured to accelerate co-development and provide earlier access to application-specific validation data. In parallel, innovative entrants specializing in recycling, thermoplastic composites, and hybrid architectures are challenging legacy players by offering alternative value propositions around circularity and rapid processing.
Service providers and system integrators play a critical role in bridging material innovation with manufacturing execution, offering integration of simulation, tooling design, and quality assurance capabilities. Taken together, these corporate strategies illustrate an ecosystem shifting from component-level innovation to end-to-end solution delivery, with competitive advantage accruing to entities that can synchronize R&D, scale-up, and market access.
Actionable strategic recommendations for executives to align materials innovation, manufacturing readiness, supply resilience, and sustainability targets for scalable textile composite adoption
Industry leaders should prioritize a coordinated approach that aligns material science investments with manufacturing readiness and supply-chain resilience. Begin by integrating cross-functional teams that include materials engineers, procurement, quality, and product managers to create a unified evaluation framework for candidate textile composite solutions. This alignment reduces circular decision making and accelerates qualification timelines by ensuring design constraints, sourcing risk, and cost considerations are evaluated in parallel.
Investing in pilot-scale manufacturing and modular tooling lowers the cost and time of scale-up while enabling rapid iteration of material-process combinations. Such investments should be complemented by targeted supplier development programs that transfer capability to regional partners and build redundancy into critical supply nodes. In procurement, develop flexible contracting mechanisms and pre-qualification pools to enable fast substitution of inputs with minimal disruption.
Adopt measurable sustainability targets that drive material choices and end-of-life planning; these targets should be embedded into procurement scorecards and product roadmaps to ensure consistency. Finally, executives should pursue strategic collaborations-sharing non-proprietary performance data and co-funding validation programs-to accelerate market acceptance and lower commercialization risk. These actions will help organizations convert technical promise into resilient, scalable business outcomes.
A transparent, triangulated research methodology combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking, and process-level comparative analysis to ensure robust and actionable insights
This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence using a structured methodology that emphasizes traceability and reproducibility. Primary insights derive from interviews with technical leads, procurement specialists, and operations managers across end-user segments, complemented by supplier assessments and plant-level observations. Secondary sources include peer-reviewed materials science literature, industry standards and certification guidance, and publicly disclosed technical disclosures from manufacturers and testing laboratories.
Analytical methods include qualitative thematic coding to identify recurring challenges and opportunities, materials performance benchmarking against documented test protocols, and comparative assessment of manufacturing routes based on process attributes such as cycle time, capital intensity, and scalability. Validation steps include cross-referencing interview claims with documented specifications and third-party test reports to minimize bias and ensure factual accuracy.
Limitations are acknowledged, particularly where proprietary data and confidential supplier information constrain granularity. To mitigate these gaps, the methodology prioritizes triangulation across multiple informants and emphasizes conservative interpretation of single-source claims. The approach provides a robust foundation for strategic decision-making while remaining transparent about the evidentiary basis of key conclusions.
A concise conclusion articulating how coordinated investments in materials, manufacturing, and supply-chain strategies will convert textile composite potential into durable competitive advantage
In conclusion, textile composites occupy a strategic intersection of materials innovation and manufacturing modernization that offers tangible performance benefits across diverse end markets. The industry is moving from demonstration projects to wider implementation, driven by improvements in fiber and resin systems, automated textile fabrication, and tighter integration between design and production. Stakeholders who actively align material selection with supply-chain strategies and regulatory requirements will extract the most value from these advances.
Trade policy shifts and regional competitive dynamics are accelerating structural changes in how companies source and process composite inputs, prompting increased attention to regional capacity and supplier risk management. Meanwhile, sustainability imperatives and digitalization are reshaping product development cycles, encouraging more rigorous lifecycle thinking and data-driven process controls. Leaders who adopt a cross-disciplinary approach-integrating engineering, procurement, and sustainability objectives-will reduce time to qualification and enhance the resilience of their product portfolios.
Ultimately, the path to scaled adoption requires deliberate investment in pilot capabilities, supplier development, and collaborative validation. Organizations that take these steps will be better positioned to capitalize on the performance and lifecycle advantages that textile composites can provide, turning material innovation into measurable competitive differentiation.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An informed introduction to textile composites highlighting material diversity, manufacturing convergence, and the strategic imperative for integrative adoption across industries
Textile composites have matured from niche engineering curiosities into foundational materials across multiple high-performance sectors. Advances in fiber technologies, resin chemistries, and automated textile architectures have combined to broaden application envelopes, improve manufacturability, and reduce per-unit production variability. As materials science converges with digital manufacturing, the industry now faces a pivotal moment where design freedoms and cost considerations must be balanced with regulatory and supply-chain realities.
Stakeholders from aerospace engineers to infrastructure planners increasingly rely on textile composites for weight reduction, corrosion resistance, and lifecycle performance. These materials are not monolithic; they range from woven carbon architectures tailored for stiffness to non-woven glass constructions optimized for impact absorption. Consequently, decision-makers must integrate material selection early in the product development cycle to fully realize the benefits these fabrics offer.
Transitioning from conventional substrates to textile composites requires intentional changes in qualification protocols, supplier relationships, and production strategies. As a result, the industry is evolving from proof-of-concept trials to scaled implementation, with cross-functional teams aligning around standardized testing, certification pathways, and robust manufacturing controls. This report provides a concise but comprehensive foundation for leaders preparing to operationalize textile composite solutions within their portfolios.
Transformative technological, supply-chain, and regulatory shifts are converging to redefine how textile composites are developed, sourced, and scaled across end markets
The landscape for textile composites is being reshaped by convergent technological, regulatory, and commercial forces. Fiber innovation and resin system advances have extended performance boundaries while additive and automated textile processes have increased repeatability and throughput. These technological shifts enable designers to rethink component architectures, integrating multi-material strategies that balance performance with cost and manufacturability.
Concurrently, supply-chain reconfiguration and heightened attention to lifecycle impacts are prompting manufacturers to reassess sourcing strategies and material circularity. Sustainable resin chemistries and recyclability pathways are moving from academic research into early commercial pilots, influencing procurement criteria as organizations aim to reduce embodied carbon and improve end-of-life outcomes. Moreover, digitization across the value chain-driven by simulation, digital twins, and real-time quality monitoring-has accelerated adoption curves by lowering technical risk and enabling predictive process control.
Regulatory and customer-driven performance expectations are also driving transformation. As safety standards evolve and performance requirements become more prescriptive, product teams must integrate compliance thinking into early design workstreams. Ultimately, these shifts are creating new competitive dynamics where companies that combine material innovation with manufacturing intelligence will capture early advantages in both legacy and emerging application areas.
How United States tariff actions in 2025 are reshaping procurement architectures, supplier strategies, and manufacturing resilience across textile composite supply chains
New tariff measures implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced a material shift in procurement strategies and cost structures for organizations that rely on imported textile composite inputs. Trade policy adjustments have increased the emphasis on regional supplier diversification, nearshoring, and vertical integration as firms seek to mitigate exposure to duty-driven cost volatility. Buyers and manufacturers are responding by reassessing supplier contracts, qualifying alternative feedstocks, and exploring domestic processing capabilities to preserve margin and delivery reliability.
These trade dynamics have a cascading effect across product roadmaps and inventory strategies. Capital allocation decisions increasingly incorporate tariff sensitivity as firms weigh the merits of buffering inventory against investing in local capacity. At the operational level, procurement teams are collaborating more closely with engineering to identify technically equivalent materials that carry lower trade risk, while legal and compliance functions monitor evolving policy interpretations and exemptions.
Over time, the tariff environment is accelerating structural shifts that were already underway: investments in domestic fabrication capabilities, closer partnerships with regional fiber producers, and reconfiguration of global logistics networks. Organizations that proactively adapt procurement architectures and build flexible sourcing playbooks will be better positioned to maintain cost competitiveness and supply continuity in a trade environment that remains dynamic.
Detailed segmentation-driven insights connecting end-use requirements, resin and fiber choices, textile architectures, form factors, and manufacturing pathways for strategic decision-making
Segmentation analysis reveals where technical requirements and commercial dynamics intersect to create differentiated opportunities across the textile composites value chain. Based on End Use Industry, market is studied across Aerospace And Defense, Automotive, Construction And Infrastructure, Marine, Sports And Recreational, and Wind Energy. The Aerospace And Defense is further studied across Commercial Aircraft, Military Aircraft, and Spacecraft. The Automotive is further studied across Aftermarket and Oem. Each end-use category imposes distinct regulatory, performance, and certification obligations that influence material selection, with aerospace demanding rigorous qualification and automotive prioritizing cost and cycle time for high-volume applications.
Based on Resin Type, market is studied across Epoxy, Polyester, and Vinyl Ester. Epoxy systems typically address high-performance needs such as fatigue resistance and elevated temperature capability, whereas polyester and vinyl ester systems are often selected for cost-efficient, corrosion-resistant solutions in infrastructure and marine contexts. Material engineers must balance resin chemistry with processing constraints and end-use durability expectations to achieve optimal life-cycle outcomes.
Based on Fiber Type, market is studied across Aramid Fiber, Carbon Fiber, and Glass Fiber. Carbon fibers deliver superior stiffness-to-weight metrics favored in aerospace and high-end sporting goods, aramid fibers offer impact resistance used in defense and ballistic applications, and glass fibers provide cost-effective versatility for marine, construction, and wind applications. The selection among these fibers is driven by performance targets, cost envelopes, and manufacturability.
Based on Composite Type, market is studied across Braided, Knitted, Non Woven, Quilted, and Woven. Each textile architecture creates unique load paths and failure modes, which in turn affect design certification strategies and tooling choices. Designers often pair textile architecture to resin systems and manufacturing methods to tailor properties such as through-thickness strength and conformity to compound geometries.
Based on Form, market is studied across Chopped, Laminates, Prepreg, and Tow. Forms influence downstream processing choices and supply logistics; for example, prepregs enable consistent resin distribution but require cold-chain management, while chopped forms offer flexibility for molding at the expense of directional reinforcement. Finally, based on Manufacturing Process, market is studied across Compression Molding, Filament Winding, Hand Lay Up, Pultrusion, and Resin Transfer Molding. Each manufacturing route carries distinct cycle-time, tooling, and capital intensity implications that affect total cost of ownership and scalability. Understanding how these segmentation layers interrelate is essential for aligning material selection with production strategy and application performance requirements.
Regional competitive dynamics across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence sourcing, sustainability priorities, and manufacturing investment strategies
Regional dynamics are shaping competitive positioning and investment priorities across textile composites. The Americas region has a strong industrial base with advanced aerospace, automotive, and wind energy clusters that favor high-performance carbon and hybrid solutions. Localized production capacity, coupled with policy shifts and logistics considerations, is prompting firms in this region to invest in vertical integration and supplier partnerships to reduce exposure to cross-border trade fluctuations.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where stringent environmental regulations and a focus on decarbonization influence material and process selection. European OEMs and infrastructure developers increasingly evaluate recyclability and embodied carbon, driving interest in recyclable thermoset alternatives and process innovations aimed at reducing waste. The Middle East shows growing interest in marine and construction applications that leverage glass fiber systems for corrosion resistance, while North Africa is emerging as a potential manufacturing node due to cost and proximity to European markets.
Asia-Pacific remains a crucial hub for both upstream fiber production and downstream manufacturing. It combines large-scale glass and carbon fiber capacity with an expanding base of specialized textile mills and automated composite manufacturers. Investment in digital manufacturing and process automation is accelerating, enabling higher-volume adoption across automotive and consumer sports segments. Taken together, regional strengths shape supply-chain strategies, innovation priorities, and partnership models for companies seeking to scale textile composite adoption globally.
Corporate strategic moves across materials innovation, manufacturing automation, and cross-industry partnerships that are shaping competitive advantage in textile composites
Major companies operating within the textile composites ecosystem are pursuing differentiated strategies across technology development, vertical integration, and market-facing partnerships. Leading material suppliers are focusing on advanced fiber chemistries and novel sizing technologies that improve interfacial bonding and enable higher-performing laminates. These efforts complement resin formulators who are advancing tougher, lower-viscosity systems that support automated impregnation and faster cure cycles.
At the manufacturing tier, composite fabricators are investing in automation, in-line inspection, and digital process control to reduce variability and compress time to qualification. Strategic collaborations between textile producers, resin companies, and OEMs are increasingly common, structured to accelerate co-development and provide earlier access to application-specific validation data. In parallel, innovative entrants specializing in recycling, thermoplastic composites, and hybrid architectures are challenging legacy players by offering alternative value propositions around circularity and rapid processing.
Service providers and system integrators play a critical role in bridging material innovation with manufacturing execution, offering integration of simulation, tooling design, and quality assurance capabilities. Taken together, these corporate strategies illustrate an ecosystem shifting from component-level innovation to end-to-end solution delivery, with competitive advantage accruing to entities that can synchronize R&D, scale-up, and market access.
Actionable strategic recommendations for executives to align materials innovation, manufacturing readiness, supply resilience, and sustainability targets for scalable textile composite adoption
Industry leaders should prioritize a coordinated approach that aligns material science investments with manufacturing readiness and supply-chain resilience. Begin by integrating cross-functional teams that include materials engineers, procurement, quality, and product managers to create a unified evaluation framework for candidate textile composite solutions. This alignment reduces circular decision making and accelerates qualification timelines by ensuring design constraints, sourcing risk, and cost considerations are evaluated in parallel.
Investing in pilot-scale manufacturing and modular tooling lowers the cost and time of scale-up while enabling rapid iteration of material-process combinations. Such investments should be complemented by targeted supplier development programs that transfer capability to regional partners and build redundancy into critical supply nodes. In procurement, develop flexible contracting mechanisms and pre-qualification pools to enable fast substitution of inputs with minimal disruption.
Adopt measurable sustainability targets that drive material choices and end-of-life planning; these targets should be embedded into procurement scorecards and product roadmaps to ensure consistency. Finally, executives should pursue strategic collaborations-sharing non-proprietary performance data and co-funding validation programs-to accelerate market acceptance and lower commercialization risk. These actions will help organizations convert technical promise into resilient, scalable business outcomes.
A transparent, triangulated research methodology combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking, and process-level comparative analysis to ensure robust and actionable insights
This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence using a structured methodology that emphasizes traceability and reproducibility. Primary insights derive from interviews with technical leads, procurement specialists, and operations managers across end-user segments, complemented by supplier assessments and plant-level observations. Secondary sources include peer-reviewed materials science literature, industry standards and certification guidance, and publicly disclosed technical disclosures from manufacturers and testing laboratories.
Analytical methods include qualitative thematic coding to identify recurring challenges and opportunities, materials performance benchmarking against documented test protocols, and comparative assessment of manufacturing routes based on process attributes such as cycle time, capital intensity, and scalability. Validation steps include cross-referencing interview claims with documented specifications and third-party test reports to minimize bias and ensure factual accuracy.
Limitations are acknowledged, particularly where proprietary data and confidential supplier information constrain granularity. To mitigate these gaps, the methodology prioritizes triangulation across multiple informants and emphasizes conservative interpretation of single-source claims. The approach provides a robust foundation for strategic decision-making while remaining transparent about the evidentiary basis of key conclusions.
A concise conclusion articulating how coordinated investments in materials, manufacturing, and supply-chain strategies will convert textile composite potential into durable competitive advantage
In conclusion, textile composites occupy a strategic intersection of materials innovation and manufacturing modernization that offers tangible performance benefits across diverse end markets. The industry is moving from demonstration projects to wider implementation, driven by improvements in fiber and resin systems, automated textile fabrication, and tighter integration between design and production. Stakeholders who actively align material selection with supply-chain strategies and regulatory requirements will extract the most value from these advances.
Trade policy shifts and regional competitive dynamics are accelerating structural changes in how companies source and process composite inputs, prompting increased attention to regional capacity and supplier risk management. Meanwhile, sustainability imperatives and digitalization are reshaping product development cycles, encouraging more rigorous lifecycle thinking and data-driven process controls. Leaders who adopt a cross-disciplinary approach-integrating engineering, procurement, and sustainability objectives-will reduce time to qualification and enhance the resilience of their product portfolios.
Ultimately, the path to scaled adoption requires deliberate investment in pilot capabilities, supplier development, and collaborative validation. Organizations that take these steps will be better positioned to capitalize on the performance and lifecycle advantages that textile composites can provide, turning material innovation into measurable competitive differentiation.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing adoption of sustainable bio-based fiber reinforcements in automotive composites to reduce carbon footprint
- 5.2. Advancements in 3D weaving technologies enabling high-performance composite structures with complex geometries
- 5.3. Growing demand for lightweight carbon fiber composites in aerospace applications to improve fuel efficiency
- 5.4. Development of recyclable thermoplastic composites for consumer electronics housing with improved durability
- 5.5. Implementation of smart textile composites with embedded sensors for real-time structural health monitoring
- 5.6. Rising integration of nano-enhanced coatings to improve thermal and electrical conductivity of textile composites
- 5.7. Expansion of hybrid composites combining glass and basalt fibers for enhanced cost-performance balance in wind energy
- 5.8. Surge in demand for flame-retardant textile composites in public transportation interiors for enhanced passenger safety
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Textile Composites Market, by Resin Type
- 8.1. Epoxy
- 8.2. Polyester
- 8.3. Vinyl Ester
- 9. Textile Composites Market, by Fiber Type
- 9.1. Aramid Fiber
- 9.2. Carbon Fiber
- 9.3. Glass Fiber
- 10. Textile Composites Market, by Composite Type
- 10.1. Braided
- 10.2. Knitted
- 10.3. Non Woven
- 10.4. Quilted
- 10.5. Woven
- 11. Textile Composites Market, by Form
- 11.1. Chopped
- 11.2. Laminates
- 11.3. Prepreg
- 11.4. Tow
- 12. Textile Composites Market, by Manufacturing Process
- 12.1. Compression Molding
- 12.2. Filament Winding
- 12.3. Hand Lay Up
- 12.4. Pultrusion
- 12.5. Resin Transfer Molding
- 13. Textile Composites Market, by End Use Industry
- 13.1. Aerospace And Defense
- 13.1.1. Commercial Aircraft
- 13.1.2. Military Aircraft
- 13.1.3. Spacecraft
- 13.2. Automotive
- 13.2.1. Aftermarket
- 13.2.2. Oem
- 13.3. Construction And Infrastructure
- 13.4. Marine
- 13.5. Sports And Recreational
- 13.6. Wind Energy
- 14. Textile Composites Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Textile Composites Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Textile Composites Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 17.3.2. Teijin Limited
- 17.3.3. SGL Carbon SE
- 17.3.4. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
- 17.3.5. Solvay SA
- 17.3.6. Hexcel Corporation
- 17.3.7. Owens Corning
- 17.3.8. Gurit Holding AG
- 17.3.9. Koninklijke TenCate N.V.
- 17.3.10. Jushi Group Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.11. China Jushi Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.12. Bicerano & Associates Consulting, LLC.
- 17.3.13. Bhor Chemicals and Plastics Pvt. Ltd.
- 17.3.14. ST Advanced Composites
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
