Synthetic Yarn Market by Fiber Type (Acrylic, Nylon, Polyester), Manufacturing Process (Drawn Textured Yarn, Fully Drawn Yarn, Partially Oriented Yarn), Form, End Use, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Synthetic Yarn Market was valued at USD 218.98 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 229.91 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.97%, reaching USD 322.95 billion by 2032.
A strategic orientation to the modern synthetic yarn landscape that frames operational drivers, innovation vectors, and commercial imperatives
The synthetic yarn sector continues to evolve as producers, buyers, and innovators navigate shifting raw material dynamics, technological advances, and sustainability pressures. This introduction establishes the operational context for leaders evaluating fiber portfolios, manufacturing routes, and channel strategies. It outlines the primary vectors shaping commercial decisions and the organizational levers required to respond effectively.
Recent advances in polymer science and texturizing methods have elevated product performance while compressing time-to-market for new formulations. At the same time, tightening regulatory expectations and buyer demand for traceability require more disciplined supply chain governance and documentation. Companies that balance technical differentiation with resilient sourcing and transparent sustainability narratives will capture disproportionate value.
Investors and executives should view the synthetic yarn landscape through an integrated lens that combines feedstock volatility, process innovation, and end-use application trends. This report emphasizes how operational excellence, strategic partnerships, and targeted product positioning work together to unlock growth opportunities while managing risk. A clear, actionable diagnostic of capabilities and external constraints is essential for leaders planning near-term investments and longer-term transformation.
How innovation in processing, rising sustainability mandates, and supply chain reshaping are jointly redefining competitive advantage in synthetic yarn production
The sector is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three interlocking forces: technological refinement, sustainability expectations, and supply chain realignment. Advances in spinning, texturizing, and finishing have enabled manufacturers to broaden performance characteristics without proportionally increasing cost, prompting brands to pursue higher-value applications and technical collaborations.
Concurrently, sustainability is moving from marketing narrative to procurement requirement. Brands and institutional buyers now demand transparent inputs, lower embodied carbon, and measurable end-of-life solutions. This has accelerated investment in recycled polymers, chemically recyclable formulations, and certifications that verify chain-of-custody. As a result, suppliers that can demonstrate verifiable sustainability attributes while maintaining consistent quality gain preferential consideration.
Finally, geopolitical and logistical pressures have reshaped supplier relationships and inventory policies. Companies are moving from single-source dependency to diversified, resilient networks, combining near-shore capacity for responsiveness with offshore scale for cost efficiency. Together, these shifts create a bifurcated landscape where agility and technical differentiation determine who gains market access and who remains marginalized.
Assessing the layered operational and commercial consequences of recent U.S. tariff actions and how they compel supply base diversification and risk-informed procurement
Recent changes to U.S. tariff policy in 2025 have introduced a new layer of commercial and operational complexity for global synthetic yarn producers and downstream users. These measures have altered landed costs, shifted sourcing calculus, and compelled companies to reassess long-standing supplier relationships. Procurement teams must now factor tariff exposure into supplier selection, contract terms, and inventory strategies.
The immediate effect has been a re-evaluation of near-term procurement windows and a search for low-friction alternatives that retain quality and lead-time expectations. Some manufacturers have absorbed incremental costs to maintain customer continuity, while others have negotiated cost-sharing arrangements or pivoted to alternative feedstock blends that reduce tariff vulnerability. Concurrently, compliance functions have expanded documentation processes to ensure correct tariff classification and to capture potential duty relief mechanisms where eligible.
In response, commercial teams have intensified supplier qualification processes, emphasizing dual-sourcing options and contractual flexibilities that allow rapid shifts when trade conditions change. Long-term strategic responses include investment in alternative manufacturing footprints, tariff engineering through product specification adjustments, and closer collaboration with logistics partners to optimize trade routes and incoterms. The net effect is that tariff-driven disruption has become an accelerant for supply base diversification and risk-informed commercial planning.
Detailed segmentation insights that connect fiber types, processing routes, product forms, end-use nuances, and sales channels to strategic priorities and investment choices
Segment-level understanding is essential to align product development, capacity planning, and go-to-market strategies. Examining fiber types clarifies where performance and sustainability trade-offs sit: acrylic offers certain handfeel and insulation characteristics, nylon delivers tensile strength and abrasion resistance, polyester presents a balance of cost and durability, while polypropylene provides low density and specific technical advantages. Appreciating these distinctions helps product teams prioritize R&D and match fiber attributes to targeted applications.
Manufacturing processes further influence cost structure and finished-fabric properties. Drawn textured yarn enables bulk and stretch properties attractive for activewear and performance knits; fully drawn yarn supports high-strength, dimensionally stable applications; partially oriented yarn serves niche needs where rapid production and specific mechanical behaviors are required. Process choices therefore inform capital investment, cycle times, and product positioning.
Form factors determine how yarns are incorporated into textiles. Filament yarn suits smooth, continuous surfaces and technical filaments, while staple fiber yarn aligns with spun constructions and traditional fabrics. End-use segmentation drives demand patterns and innovation priorities: apparel applications span children’s, men’s, and women’s apparel with distinct comfort and regulatory criteria; home textile demands prioritize bed linen, carpets, and curtains with durability and aesthetic considerations; industrial and medical applications require strict performance and traceability standards. Sales channels shape access to customers and service models, with direct sales enabling bespoke partnerships, distributors offering breadth and logistics support, and online channels delivering visibility and rapid replenishment. Cross-referencing these segments reveals where investment in process upgrades, fiber substitution, or channel expansion will yield the highest strategic returns.
How regional production capabilities, regulatory environments, and buyer expectations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape strategic sourcing and investment decisions
Regional dynamics reflect a blend of production capability, regulatory environments, and end-use demand patterns. In the Americas, proximity to large apparel and technical textile buyers supports responsive supply models and collaboration on sustainability initiatives, while domestic resin production and downstream converters influence feedstock access and logistics efficiency. This region increasingly favors near-shore manufacturing for speed-to-market and collaborative product development.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory rigor, sustainability standards, and premium brand demand intersect. European buyers often prioritize traceability and lower environmental footprints, prompting suppliers to offer certified recycled content and documented chain-of-custody solutions. In parts of the Middle East and Africa, cost dynamics and infrastructure considerations shape production scale and export orientation, with selective hubs developing technical capabilities for industrial and medical yarns.
Asia-Pacific remains the largest concentration of integrated value-chain capacity, combining polymer production, spinning, and finishing at scale. Manufacturers in this region continue to innovate in process efficiencies and material blends while responding to rising domestic demand for fast fashion and technical textiles. However, companies across Asia-Pacific are also adapting to stricter environmental regulations and increasing buyer scrutiny, which is accelerating investments in cleaner production technologies and wastewater management. Understanding these regional contours enables executives to align manufacturing footprints, supplier partnerships, and sustainability roadmaps with local commercial realities.
Competitive profiles and partnership models that reveal how technological capability, integration, and traceability determine supplier relevance and strategic differentiation
Competitive dynamics are defined by a combination of technological capability, supply chain integration, and the ability to demonstrate sustainability credentials. Leading players invest in continuous process improvement, automation, and quality systems that enable consistent performance at scale while reducing variability. These capabilities matter most in technical segments where tolerance and reliability are non-negotiable.
Partnership models are also evolving. Upstream-downstream collaborations-linking polymer producers, yarn manufacturers, and brand R&D teams-accelerate product innovation and speed product validation. Companies that develop transparent, auditable supply chains and that invest in traceability technologies position themselves favorably with institutional buyers and large brands seeking to satisfy regulatory and consumer demands.
Smaller, specialized manufacturers compete by focusing on niche technical properties, rapid customization, and service-oriented relationships. They often act as innovation partners for brands testing new fibers or finishes. Meanwhile, larger integrated firms benefit from scale and the ability to internalize feedstock procurement, but they must continually modernize processes to remain cost-competitive and environmentally compliant. The net result is a marketplace where strategic differentiation hinges on both technology and the credibility of sustainability claims.
Actionable priorities for leaders to strengthen resilience, speed innovation, validate sustainability claims, and capture higher-value commercial relationships
Industry leaders should prioritize a series of coordinated actions to protect margins, accelerate innovation, and meet evolving buyer requirements. First, align R&D investments with clearly defined customer use cases and sustainability goals to ensure new products address measurable performance gaps and procurement criteria. Investing in pilot lines or modular production cells can reduce commercialization risk and speed validation cycles.
Second, strengthen procurement resilience by implementing dual-sourcing strategies, diversifying feedstock options, and negotiating flexible contracts that accommodate trade volatility. Enhancing compliance and tariff-management capabilities will reduce operational surprises and enable more confident pricing strategies. Third, invest in traceability systems and third-party verification to substantiate sustainability claims, as these credentials increasingly influence buyer selection and long-term contracts.
Fourth, reconfigure commercial models to capture higher-value outcomes: develop technical services, offer collaborative development programs, and provide post-sale support that embeds suppliers deeper into customer value chains. Finally, cultivate talent and process capabilities that sustain continuous improvement in quality, environmental performance, and digital competency. These actions, taken together, will enable organizations to convert industry disruption into competitive advantage.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework leveraging primary interviews, supply chain mapping, technical scans, and multi-source triangulation for validated insights
The analysis relies on a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary research included structured interviews with executives across the value chain, technical conversations with R&D leaders, and direct dialogue with procurement and sustainability heads to validate operational constraints and decision criteria. These engagements provided first-hand perspectives on process capabilities, product performance, and commercial negotiations.
Secondary research complemented primary inputs and encompassed industry standards, regulatory frameworks, technical papers, and publicly available corporate disclosures. Supply chain mapping and trade-flow analysis identified key sourcing corridors and logistical bottlenecks, while technology scans assessed the adoption curve for emerging spinning and texturizing innovations. Data validation steps included cross-referencing interview insights with observable trade and patent activity and conducting follow-up inquiries to reconcile discrepancies.
Quality assurance emphasized triangulation: findings were corroborated across multiple sources, and sensitivity checks examined how alternative assumptions would affect strategic implications. The methodology prioritized transparency and traceability of sources, enabling readers to understand the evidentiary basis for recommendations and to pursue targeted follow-up research where required.
A decisive executive summary of strategic levers and operational priorities that drive resilience, differentiation, and sustainable commercial growth in synthetic yarns
In conclusion, the synthetic yarn sector is at an inflection point where technological refinement, sustainability imperatives, and shifting trade dynamics jointly dictate commercial outcomes. Firms that integrate process innovation with credible environmental credentials and diversified sourcing models will secure stronger, more profitable customer relationships. Conversely, companies that delay modernization or fail to substantiate sustainability claims risk being outcompeted in both premium and technical segments.
Leaders should treat the current environment as an opportunity to reconfigure their operating models: invest selectively in capabilities that directly support prioritized end-use segments, adopt procurement practices that reduce exposure to tariff and logistics shocks, and embed traceability as a fundamental part of product development. Strategic partnerships and modular manufacturing approaches can accelerate time-to-market and reduce capital risk.
Ultimately, success will hinge on a disciplined execution of technical, commercial, and governance initiatives that together enhance product differentiation, operational resilience, and stakeholder trust. Organizations that act decisively will not only navigate near-term disruptions but also position themselves for sustained relevance as buyer expectations and regulatory landscapes continue to evolve.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation to the modern synthetic yarn landscape that frames operational drivers, innovation vectors, and commercial imperatives
The synthetic yarn sector continues to evolve as producers, buyers, and innovators navigate shifting raw material dynamics, technological advances, and sustainability pressures. This introduction establishes the operational context for leaders evaluating fiber portfolios, manufacturing routes, and channel strategies. It outlines the primary vectors shaping commercial decisions and the organizational levers required to respond effectively.
Recent advances in polymer science and texturizing methods have elevated product performance while compressing time-to-market for new formulations. At the same time, tightening regulatory expectations and buyer demand for traceability require more disciplined supply chain governance and documentation. Companies that balance technical differentiation with resilient sourcing and transparent sustainability narratives will capture disproportionate value.
Investors and executives should view the synthetic yarn landscape through an integrated lens that combines feedstock volatility, process innovation, and end-use application trends. This report emphasizes how operational excellence, strategic partnerships, and targeted product positioning work together to unlock growth opportunities while managing risk. A clear, actionable diagnostic of capabilities and external constraints is essential for leaders planning near-term investments and longer-term transformation.
How innovation in processing, rising sustainability mandates, and supply chain reshaping are jointly redefining competitive advantage in synthetic yarn production
The sector is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three interlocking forces: technological refinement, sustainability expectations, and supply chain realignment. Advances in spinning, texturizing, and finishing have enabled manufacturers to broaden performance characteristics without proportionally increasing cost, prompting brands to pursue higher-value applications and technical collaborations.
Concurrently, sustainability is moving from marketing narrative to procurement requirement. Brands and institutional buyers now demand transparent inputs, lower embodied carbon, and measurable end-of-life solutions. This has accelerated investment in recycled polymers, chemically recyclable formulations, and certifications that verify chain-of-custody. As a result, suppliers that can demonstrate verifiable sustainability attributes while maintaining consistent quality gain preferential consideration.
Finally, geopolitical and logistical pressures have reshaped supplier relationships and inventory policies. Companies are moving from single-source dependency to diversified, resilient networks, combining near-shore capacity for responsiveness with offshore scale for cost efficiency. Together, these shifts create a bifurcated landscape where agility and technical differentiation determine who gains market access and who remains marginalized.
Assessing the layered operational and commercial consequences of recent U.S. tariff actions and how they compel supply base diversification and risk-informed procurement
Recent changes to U.S. tariff policy in 2025 have introduced a new layer of commercial and operational complexity for global synthetic yarn producers and downstream users. These measures have altered landed costs, shifted sourcing calculus, and compelled companies to reassess long-standing supplier relationships. Procurement teams must now factor tariff exposure into supplier selection, contract terms, and inventory strategies.
The immediate effect has been a re-evaluation of near-term procurement windows and a search for low-friction alternatives that retain quality and lead-time expectations. Some manufacturers have absorbed incremental costs to maintain customer continuity, while others have negotiated cost-sharing arrangements or pivoted to alternative feedstock blends that reduce tariff vulnerability. Concurrently, compliance functions have expanded documentation processes to ensure correct tariff classification and to capture potential duty relief mechanisms where eligible.
In response, commercial teams have intensified supplier qualification processes, emphasizing dual-sourcing options and contractual flexibilities that allow rapid shifts when trade conditions change. Long-term strategic responses include investment in alternative manufacturing footprints, tariff engineering through product specification adjustments, and closer collaboration with logistics partners to optimize trade routes and incoterms. The net effect is that tariff-driven disruption has become an accelerant for supply base diversification and risk-informed commercial planning.
Detailed segmentation insights that connect fiber types, processing routes, product forms, end-use nuances, and sales channels to strategic priorities and investment choices
Segment-level understanding is essential to align product development, capacity planning, and go-to-market strategies. Examining fiber types clarifies where performance and sustainability trade-offs sit: acrylic offers certain handfeel and insulation characteristics, nylon delivers tensile strength and abrasion resistance, polyester presents a balance of cost and durability, while polypropylene provides low density and specific technical advantages. Appreciating these distinctions helps product teams prioritize R&D and match fiber attributes to targeted applications.
Manufacturing processes further influence cost structure and finished-fabric properties. Drawn textured yarn enables bulk and stretch properties attractive for activewear and performance knits; fully drawn yarn supports high-strength, dimensionally stable applications; partially oriented yarn serves niche needs where rapid production and specific mechanical behaviors are required. Process choices therefore inform capital investment, cycle times, and product positioning.
Form factors determine how yarns are incorporated into textiles. Filament yarn suits smooth, continuous surfaces and technical filaments, while staple fiber yarn aligns with spun constructions and traditional fabrics. End-use segmentation drives demand patterns and innovation priorities: apparel applications span children’s, men’s, and women’s apparel with distinct comfort and regulatory criteria; home textile demands prioritize bed linen, carpets, and curtains with durability and aesthetic considerations; industrial and medical applications require strict performance and traceability standards. Sales channels shape access to customers and service models, with direct sales enabling bespoke partnerships, distributors offering breadth and logistics support, and online channels delivering visibility and rapid replenishment. Cross-referencing these segments reveals where investment in process upgrades, fiber substitution, or channel expansion will yield the highest strategic returns.
How regional production capabilities, regulatory environments, and buyer expectations across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape strategic sourcing and investment decisions
Regional dynamics reflect a blend of production capability, regulatory environments, and end-use demand patterns. In the Americas, proximity to large apparel and technical textile buyers supports responsive supply models and collaboration on sustainability initiatives, while domestic resin production and downstream converters influence feedstock access and logistics efficiency. This region increasingly favors near-shore manufacturing for speed-to-market and collaborative product development.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory rigor, sustainability standards, and premium brand demand intersect. European buyers often prioritize traceability and lower environmental footprints, prompting suppliers to offer certified recycled content and documented chain-of-custody solutions. In parts of the Middle East and Africa, cost dynamics and infrastructure considerations shape production scale and export orientation, with selective hubs developing technical capabilities for industrial and medical yarns.
Asia-Pacific remains the largest concentration of integrated value-chain capacity, combining polymer production, spinning, and finishing at scale. Manufacturers in this region continue to innovate in process efficiencies and material blends while responding to rising domestic demand for fast fashion and technical textiles. However, companies across Asia-Pacific are also adapting to stricter environmental regulations and increasing buyer scrutiny, which is accelerating investments in cleaner production technologies and wastewater management. Understanding these regional contours enables executives to align manufacturing footprints, supplier partnerships, and sustainability roadmaps with local commercial realities.
Competitive profiles and partnership models that reveal how technological capability, integration, and traceability determine supplier relevance and strategic differentiation
Competitive dynamics are defined by a combination of technological capability, supply chain integration, and the ability to demonstrate sustainability credentials. Leading players invest in continuous process improvement, automation, and quality systems that enable consistent performance at scale while reducing variability. These capabilities matter most in technical segments where tolerance and reliability are non-negotiable.
Partnership models are also evolving. Upstream-downstream collaborations-linking polymer producers, yarn manufacturers, and brand R&D teams-accelerate product innovation and speed product validation. Companies that develop transparent, auditable supply chains and that invest in traceability technologies position themselves favorably with institutional buyers and large brands seeking to satisfy regulatory and consumer demands.
Smaller, specialized manufacturers compete by focusing on niche technical properties, rapid customization, and service-oriented relationships. They often act as innovation partners for brands testing new fibers or finishes. Meanwhile, larger integrated firms benefit from scale and the ability to internalize feedstock procurement, but they must continually modernize processes to remain cost-competitive and environmentally compliant. The net result is a marketplace where strategic differentiation hinges on both technology and the credibility of sustainability claims.
Actionable priorities for leaders to strengthen resilience, speed innovation, validate sustainability claims, and capture higher-value commercial relationships
Industry leaders should prioritize a series of coordinated actions to protect margins, accelerate innovation, and meet evolving buyer requirements. First, align R&D investments with clearly defined customer use cases and sustainability goals to ensure new products address measurable performance gaps and procurement criteria. Investing in pilot lines or modular production cells can reduce commercialization risk and speed validation cycles.
Second, strengthen procurement resilience by implementing dual-sourcing strategies, diversifying feedstock options, and negotiating flexible contracts that accommodate trade volatility. Enhancing compliance and tariff-management capabilities will reduce operational surprises and enable more confident pricing strategies. Third, invest in traceability systems and third-party verification to substantiate sustainability claims, as these credentials increasingly influence buyer selection and long-term contracts.
Fourth, reconfigure commercial models to capture higher-value outcomes: develop technical services, offer collaborative development programs, and provide post-sale support that embeds suppliers deeper into customer value chains. Finally, cultivate talent and process capabilities that sustain continuous improvement in quality, environmental performance, and digital competency. These actions, taken together, will enable organizations to convert industry disruption into competitive advantage.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework leveraging primary interviews, supply chain mapping, technical scans, and multi-source triangulation for validated insights
The analysis relies on a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary research included structured interviews with executives across the value chain, technical conversations with R&D leaders, and direct dialogue with procurement and sustainability heads to validate operational constraints and decision criteria. These engagements provided first-hand perspectives on process capabilities, product performance, and commercial negotiations.
Secondary research complemented primary inputs and encompassed industry standards, regulatory frameworks, technical papers, and publicly available corporate disclosures. Supply chain mapping and trade-flow analysis identified key sourcing corridors and logistical bottlenecks, while technology scans assessed the adoption curve for emerging spinning and texturizing innovations. Data validation steps included cross-referencing interview insights with observable trade and patent activity and conducting follow-up inquiries to reconcile discrepancies.
Quality assurance emphasized triangulation: findings were corroborated across multiple sources, and sensitivity checks examined how alternative assumptions would affect strategic implications. The methodology prioritized transparency and traceability of sources, enabling readers to understand the evidentiary basis for recommendations and to pursue targeted follow-up research where required.
A decisive executive summary of strategic levers and operational priorities that drive resilience, differentiation, and sustainable commercial growth in synthetic yarns
In conclusion, the synthetic yarn sector is at an inflection point where technological refinement, sustainability imperatives, and shifting trade dynamics jointly dictate commercial outcomes. Firms that integrate process innovation with credible environmental credentials and diversified sourcing models will secure stronger, more profitable customer relationships. Conversely, companies that delay modernization or fail to substantiate sustainability claims risk being outcompeted in both premium and technical segments.
Leaders should treat the current environment as an opportunity to reconfigure their operating models: invest selectively in capabilities that directly support prioritized end-use segments, adopt procurement practices that reduce exposure to tariff and logistics shocks, and embed traceability as a fundamental part of product development. Strategic partnerships and modular manufacturing approaches can accelerate time-to-market and reduce capital risk.
Ultimately, success will hinge on a disciplined execution of technical, commercial, and governance initiatives that together enhance product differentiation, operational resilience, and stakeholder trust. Organizations that act decisively will not only navigate near-term disruptions but also position themselves for sustained relevance as buyer expectations and regulatory landscapes continue to evolve.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
190 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing demand for recycled polyester yarn driven by sustainable fashion initiatives
- 5.2. Development of bio-based nylon yarns blending high performance with reduced environmental impact
- 5.3. Adoption of high-tenacity synthetic yarns for advanced industrial and technical textile applications
- 5.4. Rising use of antimicrobial polyester yarns in healthcare uniforms and activewear textiles
- 5.5. Integration of digital printing compatibility in synthetic yarn to enable on-demand personalized design
- 5.6. Innovations in moisture-wicking synthetic yarns enhancing comfort and performance in athleisure markets
- 5.7. Collaborative partnerships between yarn manufacturers and fashion brands to promote circular economy models
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Fiber Type
- 8.1. Acrylic
- 8.2. Nylon
- 8.3. Polyester
- 8.4. Polypropylene
- 9. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Manufacturing Process
- 9.1. Drawn Textured Yarn
- 9.2. Fully Drawn Yarn
- 9.3. Partially Oriented Yarn
- 10. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Form
- 10.1. Filament Yarn
- 10.2. Staple Fiber Yarn
- 11. Synthetic Yarn Market, by End Use
- 11.1. Apparel
- 11.1.1. Children's Apparel
- 11.1.2. Men's Apparel
- 11.1.3. Women's Apparel
- 11.2. Home Textile
- 11.2.1. Bed Linen
- 11.2.2. Carpets
- 11.2.3. Curtains
- 11.3. Industrial
- 11.4. Medical
- 12. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Sales Channel
- 12.1. Offline
- 12.2. Online
- 13. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Synthetic Yarn Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.2. Teijin Limited
- 16.3.3. Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited
- 16.3.4. Reliance Industries Limited
- 16.3.5. Far Eastern New Century Corporation
- 16.3.6. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.7. BASF SE
- 16.3.8. Lenzing AG
- 16.3.9. Asahi Kasei Corporation
- 16.3.10. Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
- 16.3.11. Hyosung Corporation
- 16.3.12. Aditya Birla Group
- 16.3.13. Grasim Industries Limited
- 16.3.14. Yılmak Makine Yatırımları A.Ş.
- 16.3.15. Nylstar S.A.
- 16.3.16. Radici Partecipazioni SpA
- 16.3.17. Alpek S.A.B. de C.V.
- 16.3.18. DAK Americas LLC
- 16.3.19. Sinopec Yizheng Chemical Fibre Company Limited
- 16.3.20. Nanya Plastics Corporation
- 16.3.21. Toyobo Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Kolon Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Toray Chemical Korea Inc.
- 16.3.24. Unifi, Inc.
- 16.3.25. Tongkun Group Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.26. Zhejiang Hengyi Group Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
