Synthetic Aperture Radar Market by Product (Hardware, Services, Software), Platform (Airborne, Ground Vehicle, Marine), Frequency Band, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Synthetic Aperture Radar Market was valued at USD 4.91 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.13 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.21%, reaching USD 7.96 billion by 2032.
Overview of synthetic aperture radar evolution highlighting sensor miniaturization, algorithm convergence, and the new operational paradigms reshaping deployment and data use
Synthetic aperture radar continues to emerge as a foundational technology for persistent, all-weather, day-and-night sensing across commercial, civil, and defense domains. Recent years have seen an acceleration in sensor miniaturization, onboard processing capabilities, and the integration of advanced imaging algorithms, all of which have expanded SAR applicability beyond traditional surveillance and remote sensing missions. As a result, program managers and technology investors face a more complex landscape where hardware choices, software analytics, and services integration determine the practical value of SAR deployments.
Transitioning from legacy platforms to modern SAR architectures requires a nuanced understanding of trade-offs between frequency bands, platform constraints, and application requirements. This report synthesizes recent technological advances and procurement trends to help readers navigate choices related to sensor design, data exploitation, and operational deployment. The introduction sets the stage for deeper sections by highlighting the convergence of sensors, compute, and analytics that is reshaping mission planning, lifecycle support, and commercial service offerings.
How commoditization of sensors, platform diversification, and advanced analytics are converging to alter procurement, partnership models, and mission-level expectations
The SAR landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three intertwined forces: commoditization of sensor hardware, proliferation of small and mid-sized platforms, and the maturation of machine learning for SAR-specific analytics. Hardware commoditization is lowering barriers to entry and enabling a broader ecosystem of vendors to serve niche and scale applications. At the same time, the diversification of platforms-from small unmanned aerial systems to spaceborne constellations-is changing mission design and data cadence expectations.
Concurrently, the maturation of analytics is moving SAR from a specialist discipline into mainstream geospatial workflows. Machine learning and physics-informed models are improving anomaly detection, change detection, and classification performance while reducing manual analyst burden. These advances are enhancing the value proposition of SAR for time-sensitive applications such as disaster response and infrastructure inspection. As a result, procurement cycles are tightening and collaboration models between hardware manufacturers, software developers, and service integrators are becoming more outcome-focused. The cumulative effect is a market increasingly defined by ecosystem partnerships, modular architectures, and demand for end-to-end solutions that connect sensing to decision making.
How 2025 tariff and trade policy shifts are prompting supply chain diversification, sourcing reconfiguration, and increased emphasis on component traceability and domestic resilience
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy adjustments in 2025 has introduced new friction into supply chains for RF components, high-performance processors, and certain sensor assemblies. These measures have pressured lead times, motivated sourcing diversification, and prompted a reassessment of vertical integration strategies within the SAR value chain. Manufacturers and systems integrators have responded by re-evaluating production footprints, qualifying alternative suppliers, and accelerating design efforts that reduce exposure to constrained components.
In operational terms, the tariffs have pushed some buyers to prioritize designs that limit reliance on single-country suppliers for critical subassemblies, while others have accelerated investments in domestically sourced alternatives or in-house production capabilities. The policy environment has also elevated the importance of certification, export control compliance, and traceability across supplier tiers. Consequently, program managers are factoring geopolitical risk into procurement planning and lifecycle sustainment, which in turn affects contracting approaches, partner selection, and project timelines. These shifts have reinforced the strategic value of flexible architectures and modular designs that can accommodate component substitution without extensive system redesign.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing how product, application, platform, and frequency choices determine integration complexity, performance trade-offs, and value paths
Segmentation offers a practical lens to understand where technical complexity, customer needs, and revenue potential intersect across the SAR ecosystem. Based on product, the landscape encompasses hardware, services, and software; hardware includes antennas, processors, and sensors, each of which shapes platform integration, power budgets, and maintenance cycles; services break down into consulting, maintenance, and support and training that underpin effective fielding and sustainment; and software is composed of data analytics, image processing, and visualization tools that extract operational value from raw radar returns.
Applied across verticals, SAR supports agriculture, defense and security, disaster management, environmental monitoring, infrastructure inspection, and oil and gas use cases, with each application imposing distinct requirements for resolution, revisit rate, and analytics sophistication. Platform segmentation spans airborne, ground vehicle, marine, spaceborne, and unmanned aerial vehicle deployments; airborne options include fixed wing and rotary wing, ground vehicles are characterized by tracked and wheeled platforms, marine deployments range from buoys to ships, and unmanned aerial vehicle categories include fixed wing drones and rotary wing drones that offer differing endurance and payload constraints. Finally, frequency band choices-C band, Ka band, L band, S band, and X band-drive trade-offs among penetration, resolution, and atmospheric sensitivity.
Taken together, these segmentation dimensions reveal where integration challenges and commercialization pathways converge. For example, spaceborne and high-altitude airborne missions lean toward specific frequency bands and larger aperture designs, whereas small UAV deployments prioritize compact sensors and efficient onboard processing. Meanwhile, domain-specific analytics requirements-such as crop biomass estimation or synthetic aperture radar interferometry for infrastructure monitoring-create opportunities for specialized software modules and tailored services. A segmentation-aware strategy helps technology developers and buyers align product roadmaps with operational constraints and customer expectations.
Regional strategic differences in procurement, regulatory frameworks, and platform adoption that influence go-to-market approaches across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Geographic dynamics shape technology adoption, regulatory regimes, and procurement priorities in distinct ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, established defense programs coexist with a growing commercial market for remote sensing services and agricultural monitoring, leading to active public-private collaboration and progressive standards for data sharing and interoperability. Investment in domestic manufacturing and secure supply chains remains a policy priority, which influences procurement timing and vendor selection.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regional priorities emphasize joint capability development, infrastructure resilience, and environmental surveillance, often coordinated through multinational initiatives that favor interoperable solutions and shared service models. Data protection, export controls, and spectrum regulation also play significant roles in shaping deployment strategies. In Asia-Pacific, a robust mix of state-backed space programs, commercial launch activity, and rapid adoption of unmanned platforms has accelerated demand for both high-resolution imagery and frequent revisit capabilities. These regional distinctions create varied opportunities for local manufacturing, service delivery models, and partnerships between technology providers and system integrators, necessitating region-specific go-to-market strategies and compliance roadmaps.
Competitive dynamics and vendor differentiation shaped by end-to-end integration capabilities, specialist analytics, and partnerships that accelerate capability delivery
Leading firms across the SAR ecosystem are differentiating along technology, integration capability, and service delivery axes. Established defense primes and aerospace manufacturers continue to invest in scalable payloads and platform integration, while specialized commercial entrants are focusing on miniaturized sensors, rapid manufacturing, and cloud-native analytics. Partnerships and acquisitions remain common strategies to accelerate capability gaps, particularly in areas such as high-throughput onboard processors and AI-driven image exploitation.
For buyers, vendor selection increasingly prioritizes demonstrable system-level performance, ease of integration, and lifecycle support rather than single-component specifications. Vendors that can provide end-to-end solutions-from sensor calibration through to operational analytics and user-facing visualizations-tend to secure more complex, longer-term engagements. At the same time, companies that excel in niche capabilities, such as advanced interferometric processing or persistent maritime surveillance, find opportunities to embed their technology into wider solution stacks offered by integrators. The competitive landscape is thus characterized by a mix of vertically integrated players, best-of-breed specialists, and agile start-ups that challenge incumbents by focusing on speed-to-deployment and lower total cost of ownership.
Practical strategic actions for vendors and buyers to improve resilience, accelerate integration of edge analytics, and create enduring commercial and operational value from SAR programs
Industry leaders should prioritize modular architectures that reduce single-source dependency and enable rapid substitution of components to mitigate supply chain and policy risks. Investing in dual-sourcing strategies for critical RF components and in-house validation capabilities can shorten qualification timelines and improve resilience. Simultaneously, embedding edge compute and physics-aware machine learning into sensor payloads will increase data value while controlling bandwidth and latency constraints, which is essential for time-critical applications.
From a commercial standpoint, vendors should develop service offerings that combine technical training, lifecycle maintenance, and tailored analytics to create recurring revenue streams and deepen customer relationships. Strategic collaborations between hardware manufacturers and software developers can accelerate the delivery of integrated platforms, so fostering co-development agreements and shared roadmaps is advisable. Finally, procurement organizations are encouraged to adopt modular contracting mechanisms that reward interoperability and incremental capability delivery, while sponsoring pilot deployments that validate system performance under operational conditions. These combined actions will help organizations reduce deployment risk, shorten time to operational utility, and maximize the return on SAR investments.
Robust mixed-methods research approach combining primary expert interviews, technical validation, and multi-source triangulation to ensure rigorous and reproducible SAR insights
This research employs a mixed-methods approach that integrates primary interviews, technology validation, and secondary-source synthesis to provide a balanced and defensible assessment of the SAR landscape. Primary data collection included structured interviews with system architects, program managers, and domain experts to capture firsthand perspectives on integration challenges, procurement drivers, and operational performance criteria. These insights were cross-checked against product documentation, technical papers, and publicly available procurement records to validate trends and ensure consistency across sources.
Technical assessment included comparative analysis of sensor modalities, platform constraints, and analytics maturity, supported by vendor white papers and peer-reviewed research where available. Supply chain and policy analysis drew on publicly disclosed trade measures and supplier announcements to characterize sourcing impacts. Throughout the process, findings were triangulated to reduce bias, and key assumptions were documented to maintain transparency. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility, with data collection protocols and interview guides maintained for auditability and for tailoring future custom engagements.
Synthesis of technological maturation, policy impacts, and practical integration imperatives that define the near-term trajectory and operational value of synthetic aperture radar
Synthetic aperture radar is transitioning from a specialized, component-focused discipline into a systems-centric capability that emphasizes end-to-end data value. Technological progress in sensor miniaturization, onboard processing, and analytics is opening new commercial and civil use cases while changing defense procurement priorities. At the same time, trade policy dynamics and regional regulatory differences are reshaping supply chain strategies and vendor selection criteria, increasing the importance of modular design and supplier diversification.
Looking across product, application, platform, and frequency segments, the most successful strategies will be those that align technical choices with operational needs and that invest in integration and sustainment early in the development cycle. Organizations that combine resilient sourcing, modular engineering, and analytics-driven services will be best positioned to translate SAR data into actionable insights across a growing set of missions. In short, SAR is maturing into a versatile sensing modality, and stakeholders that adapt organizationally and technically will capture disproportionate operational and commercial advantages.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Overview of synthetic aperture radar evolution highlighting sensor miniaturization, algorithm convergence, and the new operational paradigms reshaping deployment and data use
Synthetic aperture radar continues to emerge as a foundational technology for persistent, all-weather, day-and-night sensing across commercial, civil, and defense domains. Recent years have seen an acceleration in sensor miniaturization, onboard processing capabilities, and the integration of advanced imaging algorithms, all of which have expanded SAR applicability beyond traditional surveillance and remote sensing missions. As a result, program managers and technology investors face a more complex landscape where hardware choices, software analytics, and services integration determine the practical value of SAR deployments.
Transitioning from legacy platforms to modern SAR architectures requires a nuanced understanding of trade-offs between frequency bands, platform constraints, and application requirements. This report synthesizes recent technological advances and procurement trends to help readers navigate choices related to sensor design, data exploitation, and operational deployment. The introduction sets the stage for deeper sections by highlighting the convergence of sensors, compute, and analytics that is reshaping mission planning, lifecycle support, and commercial service offerings.
How commoditization of sensors, platform diversification, and advanced analytics are converging to alter procurement, partnership models, and mission-level expectations
The SAR landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three intertwined forces: commoditization of sensor hardware, proliferation of small and mid-sized platforms, and the maturation of machine learning for SAR-specific analytics. Hardware commoditization is lowering barriers to entry and enabling a broader ecosystem of vendors to serve niche and scale applications. At the same time, the diversification of platforms-from small unmanned aerial systems to spaceborne constellations-is changing mission design and data cadence expectations.
Concurrently, the maturation of analytics is moving SAR from a specialist discipline into mainstream geospatial workflows. Machine learning and physics-informed models are improving anomaly detection, change detection, and classification performance while reducing manual analyst burden. These advances are enhancing the value proposition of SAR for time-sensitive applications such as disaster response and infrastructure inspection. As a result, procurement cycles are tightening and collaboration models between hardware manufacturers, software developers, and service integrators are becoming more outcome-focused. The cumulative effect is a market increasingly defined by ecosystem partnerships, modular architectures, and demand for end-to-end solutions that connect sensing to decision making.
How 2025 tariff and trade policy shifts are prompting supply chain diversification, sourcing reconfiguration, and increased emphasis on component traceability and domestic resilience
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy adjustments in 2025 has introduced new friction into supply chains for RF components, high-performance processors, and certain sensor assemblies. These measures have pressured lead times, motivated sourcing diversification, and prompted a reassessment of vertical integration strategies within the SAR value chain. Manufacturers and systems integrators have responded by re-evaluating production footprints, qualifying alternative suppliers, and accelerating design efforts that reduce exposure to constrained components.
In operational terms, the tariffs have pushed some buyers to prioritize designs that limit reliance on single-country suppliers for critical subassemblies, while others have accelerated investments in domestically sourced alternatives or in-house production capabilities. The policy environment has also elevated the importance of certification, export control compliance, and traceability across supplier tiers. Consequently, program managers are factoring geopolitical risk into procurement planning and lifecycle sustainment, which in turn affects contracting approaches, partner selection, and project timelines. These shifts have reinforced the strategic value of flexible architectures and modular designs that can accommodate component substitution without extensive system redesign.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing how product, application, platform, and frequency choices determine integration complexity, performance trade-offs, and value paths
Segmentation offers a practical lens to understand where technical complexity, customer needs, and revenue potential intersect across the SAR ecosystem. Based on product, the landscape encompasses hardware, services, and software; hardware includes antennas, processors, and sensors, each of which shapes platform integration, power budgets, and maintenance cycles; services break down into consulting, maintenance, and support and training that underpin effective fielding and sustainment; and software is composed of data analytics, image processing, and visualization tools that extract operational value from raw radar returns.
Applied across verticals, SAR supports agriculture, defense and security, disaster management, environmental monitoring, infrastructure inspection, and oil and gas use cases, with each application imposing distinct requirements for resolution, revisit rate, and analytics sophistication. Platform segmentation spans airborne, ground vehicle, marine, spaceborne, and unmanned aerial vehicle deployments; airborne options include fixed wing and rotary wing, ground vehicles are characterized by tracked and wheeled platforms, marine deployments range from buoys to ships, and unmanned aerial vehicle categories include fixed wing drones and rotary wing drones that offer differing endurance and payload constraints. Finally, frequency band choices-C band, Ka band, L band, S band, and X band-drive trade-offs among penetration, resolution, and atmospheric sensitivity.
Taken together, these segmentation dimensions reveal where integration challenges and commercialization pathways converge. For example, spaceborne and high-altitude airborne missions lean toward specific frequency bands and larger aperture designs, whereas small UAV deployments prioritize compact sensors and efficient onboard processing. Meanwhile, domain-specific analytics requirements-such as crop biomass estimation or synthetic aperture radar interferometry for infrastructure monitoring-create opportunities for specialized software modules and tailored services. A segmentation-aware strategy helps technology developers and buyers align product roadmaps with operational constraints and customer expectations.
Regional strategic differences in procurement, regulatory frameworks, and platform adoption that influence go-to-market approaches across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Geographic dynamics shape technology adoption, regulatory regimes, and procurement priorities in distinct ways across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, established defense programs coexist with a growing commercial market for remote sensing services and agricultural monitoring, leading to active public-private collaboration and progressive standards for data sharing and interoperability. Investment in domestic manufacturing and secure supply chains remains a policy priority, which influences procurement timing and vendor selection.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regional priorities emphasize joint capability development, infrastructure resilience, and environmental surveillance, often coordinated through multinational initiatives that favor interoperable solutions and shared service models. Data protection, export controls, and spectrum regulation also play significant roles in shaping deployment strategies. In Asia-Pacific, a robust mix of state-backed space programs, commercial launch activity, and rapid adoption of unmanned platforms has accelerated demand for both high-resolution imagery and frequent revisit capabilities. These regional distinctions create varied opportunities for local manufacturing, service delivery models, and partnerships between technology providers and system integrators, necessitating region-specific go-to-market strategies and compliance roadmaps.
Competitive dynamics and vendor differentiation shaped by end-to-end integration capabilities, specialist analytics, and partnerships that accelerate capability delivery
Leading firms across the SAR ecosystem are differentiating along technology, integration capability, and service delivery axes. Established defense primes and aerospace manufacturers continue to invest in scalable payloads and platform integration, while specialized commercial entrants are focusing on miniaturized sensors, rapid manufacturing, and cloud-native analytics. Partnerships and acquisitions remain common strategies to accelerate capability gaps, particularly in areas such as high-throughput onboard processors and AI-driven image exploitation.
For buyers, vendor selection increasingly prioritizes demonstrable system-level performance, ease of integration, and lifecycle support rather than single-component specifications. Vendors that can provide end-to-end solutions-from sensor calibration through to operational analytics and user-facing visualizations-tend to secure more complex, longer-term engagements. At the same time, companies that excel in niche capabilities, such as advanced interferometric processing or persistent maritime surveillance, find opportunities to embed their technology into wider solution stacks offered by integrators. The competitive landscape is thus characterized by a mix of vertically integrated players, best-of-breed specialists, and agile start-ups that challenge incumbents by focusing on speed-to-deployment and lower total cost of ownership.
Practical strategic actions for vendors and buyers to improve resilience, accelerate integration of edge analytics, and create enduring commercial and operational value from SAR programs
Industry leaders should prioritize modular architectures that reduce single-source dependency and enable rapid substitution of components to mitigate supply chain and policy risks. Investing in dual-sourcing strategies for critical RF components and in-house validation capabilities can shorten qualification timelines and improve resilience. Simultaneously, embedding edge compute and physics-aware machine learning into sensor payloads will increase data value while controlling bandwidth and latency constraints, which is essential for time-critical applications.
From a commercial standpoint, vendors should develop service offerings that combine technical training, lifecycle maintenance, and tailored analytics to create recurring revenue streams and deepen customer relationships. Strategic collaborations between hardware manufacturers and software developers can accelerate the delivery of integrated platforms, so fostering co-development agreements and shared roadmaps is advisable. Finally, procurement organizations are encouraged to adopt modular contracting mechanisms that reward interoperability and incremental capability delivery, while sponsoring pilot deployments that validate system performance under operational conditions. These combined actions will help organizations reduce deployment risk, shorten time to operational utility, and maximize the return on SAR investments.
Robust mixed-methods research approach combining primary expert interviews, technical validation, and multi-source triangulation to ensure rigorous and reproducible SAR insights
This research employs a mixed-methods approach that integrates primary interviews, technology validation, and secondary-source synthesis to provide a balanced and defensible assessment of the SAR landscape. Primary data collection included structured interviews with system architects, program managers, and domain experts to capture firsthand perspectives on integration challenges, procurement drivers, and operational performance criteria. These insights were cross-checked against product documentation, technical papers, and publicly available procurement records to validate trends and ensure consistency across sources.
Technical assessment included comparative analysis of sensor modalities, platform constraints, and analytics maturity, supported by vendor white papers and peer-reviewed research where available. Supply chain and policy analysis drew on publicly disclosed trade measures and supplier announcements to characterize sourcing impacts. Throughout the process, findings were triangulated to reduce bias, and key assumptions were documented to maintain transparency. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility, with data collection protocols and interview guides maintained for auditability and for tailoring future custom engagements.
Synthesis of technological maturation, policy impacts, and practical integration imperatives that define the near-term trajectory and operational value of synthetic aperture radar
Synthetic aperture radar is transitioning from a specialized, component-focused discipline into a systems-centric capability that emphasizes end-to-end data value. Technological progress in sensor miniaturization, onboard processing, and analytics is opening new commercial and civil use cases while changing defense procurement priorities. At the same time, trade policy dynamics and regional regulatory differences are reshaping supply chain strategies and vendor selection criteria, increasing the importance of modular design and supplier diversification.
Looking across product, application, platform, and frequency segments, the most successful strategies will be those that align technical choices with operational needs and that invest in integration and sustainment early in the development cycle. Organizations that combine resilient sourcing, modular engineering, and analytics-driven services will be best positioned to translate SAR data into actionable insights across a growing set of missions. In short, SAR is maturing into a versatile sensing modality, and stakeholders that adapt organizationally and technically will capture disproportionate operational and commercial advantages.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
193 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven neural networks for automated detection and classification in SAR imaging
- 5.2. Adoption of compact small satellite constellations offering high revisit SAR imagery for global monitoring
- 5.3. Development of dual-frequency X- and L-band SAR systems for improved vegetation and soil moisture analysis
- 5.4. Deployment of edge computing on SAR platforms for real-time data processing and low-latency decision making
- 5.5. Expansion of commercial SAR cloud services with on-demand data access and scalable analytics pipelines
- 5.6. Implementation of polarimetric interferometry techniques for high-precision terrain deformation and subsidence mapping
- 5.7. Integration of SAR data with multispectral and hyperspectral sensors for comprehensive environmental change detection
- 5.8. Growing use of vehicular and drone-mounted SAR sensors for autonomous navigation and obstacle detection in urban environments
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Product
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Antennas
- 8.1.2. Processors
- 8.1.3. Sensors
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Consulting
- 8.2.2. Maintenance
- 8.2.3. Support And Training
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Data Analytics
- 8.3.2. Image Processing
- 8.3.3. Visualization Tools
- 9. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Platform
- 9.1. Airborne
- 9.1.1. Fixed Wing
- 9.1.2. Rotary Wing
- 9.2. Ground Vehicle
- 9.2.1. Tracked
- 9.2.2. Wheeled
- 9.3. Marine
- 9.3.1. Buoy
- 9.3.2. Ship
- 9.4. Spaceborne
- 9.5. Uav
- 9.5.1. Fixed Wing Drone
- 9.5.2. Rotary Wing Drone
- 10. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Frequency Band
- 10.1. C Band
- 10.2. Ka Band
- 10.3. L Band
- 10.4. S Band
- 10.5. X Band
- 11. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Application
- 11.1. Agriculture
- 11.2. Defense And Security
- 11.3. Disaster Management
- 11.4. Environmental Monitoring
- 11.5. Infrastructure Inspection
- 11.6. Oil And Gas
- 12. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Synthetic Aperture Radar Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 15.3.2. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 15.3.3. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 15.3.4. Airbus SE
- 15.3.5. Thales S.A.
- 15.3.6. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 15.3.7. Saab AB
- 15.3.8. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- 15.3.9. Hensoldt AG
- 15.3.10. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
- 15.3.11. BAE Systems plc
- 15.3.12. Viasat, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
