Succinic Acid Market by Type (Bio Based, Petroleum Based), Form (Liquid, Solid), Purity Grade, Technology, Distribution Channel, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Succinic Acid Market was valued at USD 673.99 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 739.16 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.64%, reaching USD 1,407.79 million by 2032.
A strategic primer describing how succinic acid has evolved from a commodity intermediate into a multifunctional molecule shaping sustainable product innovation and supply resilience
Succinic acid has re-emerged as a strategic intermediate at the intersection of industrial chemistry, sustainable materials, and life sciences. Over recent years the compound's relevance has expanded beyond traditional uses into higher-value applications driven by evolving formulation requirements, regulatory scrutiny on solvent and polymer footprints, and rising interest in bio-based process technologies. Consequently, stakeholders across a diverse set of downstream sectors are recalibrating procurement strategies, R&D roadmaps, and supply chain risk management to reflect these shifts.
This introduction frames succinic acid not merely as a commodity acid but as a functional building block whose performance and sourcing pathways influence outcomes in agriculture, flavors and fragrances, polymers, pharmaceuticals, and specialty solvents. As pressures mount from sustainability objectives and tighter regulatory landscapes, chemical manufacturers and end users are assessing tradeoffs between petroleum-based and bio-based routes, liquid versus solid handling logistics, and the purity grades required for food, industrial, or pharmaceutical endpoints. In the sections that follow, the analysis will unpack transformative market dynamics, tariff-driven disruptions, segmented demand drivers, regional nuances, competitive behaviors among leading firms, and pragmatic actions leaders can adopt to secure resilient and profitable positions.
An analysis of technological, regulatory, and application-driven transformations that are redefining production pathways and value creation in the succinic acid ecosystem
The succinic acid landscape is experiencing transformative shifts that extend across feedstock sourcing, production technology, and end-use formulation. Rapid advances in fermentation strains and process scale-up have reduced technical barriers for bio-based production while simultaneously increasing attention to feedstock availability and lifecycle carbon intensity. These technology-driven improvements are altering capital allocation decisions and incentivizing collaboration between chemical producers, biotech firms, and agricultural suppliers to secure renewable inputs and integrate circularity into product value chains.
Concurrently, demand-side dynamics are reshaping where and how succinic acid is deployed. Within coatings, adhesives and polymer synthesis, the adoption of biodegradable and high-performance polyesters has elevated the role of succinic acid as a monomeric precursor. In flavors and fragrances, nuanced aromatic and solubilization properties are creating incremental opportunities for tailored grades, and in pharmaceuticals, the requirement for controlled impurity profiles is driving investments in higher-purity manufacturing lines. Meanwhile, regulatory pressures around solvent use, emissions, and waste disposal are compounding incentives for formulators to select alternatives that balance performance with compliance. Taken together, these technological, regulatory, and application-level shifts are reconfiguring competitive advantages and accelerating a bifurcation between low-cost commodity supply chains and specialized high-value, high-purity offerings.
A focused examination of how 2025 tariff measures reshaped sourcing economics, contractual behavior, and supply chain resilience across the succinic acid value chain
The cumulative impact of tariff actions announced in 2025 introduced immediate and downstream effects that reverberated across procurement, pricing negotiations, and supplier selection strategies. Tariff measures applied to certain imported chemical feedstocks and intermediate acids raised landed costs for import-dependent buyers and compelled multinational purchasers to reassess sourcing portfolios. As a result, contract structures evolved to incorporate greater cost pass-through language, extended lead time allowances, and contingent sourcing clauses to mitigate exposure to sudden trade policy changes.
In response, many buyers accelerated qualification of near-shore suppliers and placed greater emphasis on supplier diversification to reduce single-source dependence. For producers that relied heavily on export markets, tariffs prompted recalibration of regional supply chains and an increased focus on value-added services such as technical support and customized grades to defend margin. Moreover, differential treatment applied to petroleum-based versus bio-based inputs intensified strategic debate about vertical integration and local feedstock sourcing. Compliance costs increased for trading operations, while the administrative burden of customs classification and documentation led to modest operational delays. Looking forward, stakeholders are balancing short-term tactics to soften tariff shocks with medium-term strategic moves, including deeper commercial partnerships and investments in domestic production capabilities to create a more resilient cost base and maintain customer trust.
Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how application requirements, production technology, and distribution choices jointly determine commercial differentiation and customer preferences
A segmented perspective clarifies where demand is concentrated and how technical requirements differ across applications, types, forms, purity grades, technologies, and distribution pathways. Based on Application, users range from Agriculture and Chemical Intermediates to Cosmetics, Flavors And Fragrances, Food And Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, Polymers, and Solvents, with specific Agriculture needs spanning Pesticide Formulations and Plant Growth Regulators, Flavors And Fragrances differentiating between Aroma Chemical and Flavoring Compositions, Pharmaceuticals requiring Drug Intermediates and Excipients, and Polymers demanding tailored monomers such as Polyamide, Polybutylene Succinate, and Unsaturated Polyester Resins. These application distinctions translate into diverse technical specifications, regulatory expectations, and willingness to pay for differentiated grades.
Based on Type, the competitive dynamics diverge between Bio Based and Petroleum Based offerings, with bio-based routes drawing premium consideration where lifecycle emissions and renewable content are relevant to corporate sustainability goals. Based on Form, the logistics and handling implications of Liquid versus Solid succinic acid influence downstream processing decisions and warehousing requirements. Based on Purity Grade, end users select between Food Grade, Industrial Grade, and Pharmaceutical Grade product streams, each carrying distinct testing, documentation, and traceability demands. Based on Technology, production choices between Chemical Synthesis and Fermentation shape cost structures, capital intensity, and feedstock exposure. Finally, based on Distribution Channel, commercial reach and service models vary across Direct Sales, Distributors, and Online Platforms, affecting lead times, technical support availability, and contract flexibility. Together these segmentation lenses reveal that commercial success depends on aligning product specification, production pathway, and go-to-market model to the nuanced needs of each end-use cluster.
A regional appraisal explaining how distinct regulatory regimes, feedstock access, and industrial demand patterns in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific shape competitive strategy
Regional dynamics shape strategic priorities because feedstock availability, regulatory frameworks, and downstream demand profiles vary notably across global geographies. In the Americas, industrial and pharmaceutical clusters emphasize scale, integrated petrochemical value chains, and growing interest in bio-based alternatives as corporate sustainability targets gain traction. Infrastructure maturity and established logistics corridors support large-volume supply contracts, while innovation pockets concentrate around fermentation scale-up and polymer applications.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, circularity policies, and incentives for renewable chemistry drive differentiated demand for higher-purity and bio-based succinic acid variants. Industrial innovation centers in Europe increasingly prioritize lifecycle analysis and compliance documentation, and manufacturers in the region often pursue premium positioning through traceability and certification. In the Asia-Pacific region, demand is characterized by a broad base of industrial consumption, fast-growing specialty applications, and diverse supplier ecosystems. Competitive dynamics here reflect a mix of cost-sensitive commodity sourcing and rapidly maturing domestic bio-based capabilities, with cross-border trade flows influenced by regional free trade agreements and localized capacity expansions. Understanding these regional contrasts is essential for designing supply strategies, aligning product portfolios, and prioritizing commercial investments.
An assessment of how producers and innovators are deploying technology, partnerships, and commercial models to secure competitive advantage across commodity and specialty succinic acid segments
Competitors across the succinic acid landscape are pursuing a variety of strategic plays that include technological differentiation, vertical integration, and collaborative partnerships. Leading producers are investing in fermentation strain improvement and process intensification to lower unit costs and secure feedstock flexibility, while others double down on chemical synthesis routes that leverage existing petrochemical infrastructure and raw material access. In parallel, companies are moving to lock in offtake agreements with downstream polymer and pharmaceutical manufacturers, creating tighter commercial linkages that help stabilize demand and support capital investments.
Strategic alliances between biotechnology firms and chemical incumbents are accelerating technology transfer and enabling faster commercialization of bio-based pathways. At the same time, some players are prioritizing product portfolio segmentation to serve both commodity-grade industrial demand and high-margin pharmaceutical or food-grade niches. Investment in quality systems, regulatory compliance, and customer technical service capabilities is becoming a differentiator for those targeting pharmaceutical and food applications. Collectively, these strategic behaviors suggest a competitive environment where scale, technological edge, and go-to-market agility determine the ability to capture higher-value end-use opportunities.
Actionable guidance for manufacturers and buyers focused on securing resilient supply, optimizing raw material choices, and accelerating value capture through technical service and partnerships
Industry leaders can adopt a set of pragmatic actions to protect margins, accelerate innovation, and strengthen supply continuity. First, aligning sourcing strategies with application-specific purity and form requirements while simultaneously qualifying alternate suppliers reduces exposure to trade disruptions and single-point failures. Second, investing selectively in fermentation capabilities or contract-manufacturing relationships can provide strategic optionality between bio-based and petroleum-based routes, particularly for customers prioritizing sustainability credentials. Third, embedding lifecycle and regulatory compliance data into product documentation enhances customer trust and supports premium pricing for verified low-carbon or certified grades.
Moreover, companies should consider advancing technical service offerings that help downstream formulators optimize succinic acid usage in polymers, flavors, and pharmaceutical intermediates, thereby increasing switching costs and reinforcing commercial relationships. Operationally, upgrading logistics planning to manage differences in handling between liquid and solid forms and enhancing inventory visibility across distribution channels will improve responsiveness. Finally, pursuing targeted partnerships for feedstock sourcing, R&D collaborations, and joint commercialization can accelerate time-to-market for differentiated grades and open new co-development pathways with strategic customers.
A transparent description of the qualitative and secondary research methods used to derive insights, including stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and policy verification processes
This analysis synthesizes primary qualitative interviews with industry procurement leaders, technical experts, and process engineers, together with secondary research from publicly available regulatory filings, patent disclosures, company presentations, and trade policy announcements. Primary engagements concentrated on practitioners working across applications such as agriculture, flavors and fragrances, polymers, and pharmaceuticals to surface nuanced specification needs and procurement responses to recent tariff developments.
Where appropriate, findings were cross-validated against technical literature on fermentation and chemical synthesis process economics, as well as documented case studies of industrial polymerization projects that use succinic acid-derived monomers. Data integrity checks included triangulation of supplier claims, verification of technology readiness levels, and confirmation of regulatory requirements for purity grades in food and pharmaceutical contexts. Throughout the methodology, emphasis was placed on qualitative rigor, transparency of sources, and reproducibility of core insights to ensure the analysis supports robust commercial decision-making.
A compelling conclusion emphasizing the strategic choices that will determine which companies thrive as succinic acid use expands across sustainability-focused and high-performance applications
In closing, succinic acid occupies a pivotal role at the confluence of sustainability-driven innovation and traditional industrial chemistry, and stakeholders who proactively align production choices, distribution models, and product specifications will be best positioned to capture emerging value. Technological advances in fermentation, coupled with changing regulatory expectations and application-level differentiation, are creating a bifurcated landscape in which commodity suppliers and high-purity specialists coexist alongside collaborative ventures that bridge the two worlds.
Decision makers should prioritize clarity around end-use specifications, invest in supplier diversification where tariffs and trade uncertainty are present, and pursue targeted capabilities that enable rapid adaptation to customer requirements. By integrating technical service excellence, lifecycle transparency, and strategic partnerships into commercial playbooks, companies can mitigate near-term disruptions and build durable competitive advantage across agriculture, polymers, pharmaceuticals, flavors and other key end markets.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic primer describing how succinic acid has evolved from a commodity intermediate into a multifunctional molecule shaping sustainable product innovation and supply resilience
Succinic acid has re-emerged as a strategic intermediate at the intersection of industrial chemistry, sustainable materials, and life sciences. Over recent years the compound's relevance has expanded beyond traditional uses into higher-value applications driven by evolving formulation requirements, regulatory scrutiny on solvent and polymer footprints, and rising interest in bio-based process technologies. Consequently, stakeholders across a diverse set of downstream sectors are recalibrating procurement strategies, R&D roadmaps, and supply chain risk management to reflect these shifts.
This introduction frames succinic acid not merely as a commodity acid but as a functional building block whose performance and sourcing pathways influence outcomes in agriculture, flavors and fragrances, polymers, pharmaceuticals, and specialty solvents. As pressures mount from sustainability objectives and tighter regulatory landscapes, chemical manufacturers and end users are assessing tradeoffs between petroleum-based and bio-based routes, liquid versus solid handling logistics, and the purity grades required for food, industrial, or pharmaceutical endpoints. In the sections that follow, the analysis will unpack transformative market dynamics, tariff-driven disruptions, segmented demand drivers, regional nuances, competitive behaviors among leading firms, and pragmatic actions leaders can adopt to secure resilient and profitable positions.
An analysis of technological, regulatory, and application-driven transformations that are redefining production pathways and value creation in the succinic acid ecosystem
The succinic acid landscape is experiencing transformative shifts that extend across feedstock sourcing, production technology, and end-use formulation. Rapid advances in fermentation strains and process scale-up have reduced technical barriers for bio-based production while simultaneously increasing attention to feedstock availability and lifecycle carbon intensity. These technology-driven improvements are altering capital allocation decisions and incentivizing collaboration between chemical producers, biotech firms, and agricultural suppliers to secure renewable inputs and integrate circularity into product value chains.
Concurrently, demand-side dynamics are reshaping where and how succinic acid is deployed. Within coatings, adhesives and polymer synthesis, the adoption of biodegradable and high-performance polyesters has elevated the role of succinic acid as a monomeric precursor. In flavors and fragrances, nuanced aromatic and solubilization properties are creating incremental opportunities for tailored grades, and in pharmaceuticals, the requirement for controlled impurity profiles is driving investments in higher-purity manufacturing lines. Meanwhile, regulatory pressures around solvent use, emissions, and waste disposal are compounding incentives for formulators to select alternatives that balance performance with compliance. Taken together, these technological, regulatory, and application-level shifts are reconfiguring competitive advantages and accelerating a bifurcation between low-cost commodity supply chains and specialized high-value, high-purity offerings.
A focused examination of how 2025 tariff measures reshaped sourcing economics, contractual behavior, and supply chain resilience across the succinic acid value chain
The cumulative impact of tariff actions announced in 2025 introduced immediate and downstream effects that reverberated across procurement, pricing negotiations, and supplier selection strategies. Tariff measures applied to certain imported chemical feedstocks and intermediate acids raised landed costs for import-dependent buyers and compelled multinational purchasers to reassess sourcing portfolios. As a result, contract structures evolved to incorporate greater cost pass-through language, extended lead time allowances, and contingent sourcing clauses to mitigate exposure to sudden trade policy changes.
In response, many buyers accelerated qualification of near-shore suppliers and placed greater emphasis on supplier diversification to reduce single-source dependence. For producers that relied heavily on export markets, tariffs prompted recalibration of regional supply chains and an increased focus on value-added services such as technical support and customized grades to defend margin. Moreover, differential treatment applied to petroleum-based versus bio-based inputs intensified strategic debate about vertical integration and local feedstock sourcing. Compliance costs increased for trading operations, while the administrative burden of customs classification and documentation led to modest operational delays. Looking forward, stakeholders are balancing short-term tactics to soften tariff shocks with medium-term strategic moves, including deeper commercial partnerships and investments in domestic production capabilities to create a more resilient cost base and maintain customer trust.
Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how application requirements, production technology, and distribution choices jointly determine commercial differentiation and customer preferences
A segmented perspective clarifies where demand is concentrated and how technical requirements differ across applications, types, forms, purity grades, technologies, and distribution pathways. Based on Application, users range from Agriculture and Chemical Intermediates to Cosmetics, Flavors And Fragrances, Food And Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, Polymers, and Solvents, with specific Agriculture needs spanning Pesticide Formulations and Plant Growth Regulators, Flavors And Fragrances differentiating between Aroma Chemical and Flavoring Compositions, Pharmaceuticals requiring Drug Intermediates and Excipients, and Polymers demanding tailored monomers such as Polyamide, Polybutylene Succinate, and Unsaturated Polyester Resins. These application distinctions translate into diverse technical specifications, regulatory expectations, and willingness to pay for differentiated grades.
Based on Type, the competitive dynamics diverge between Bio Based and Petroleum Based offerings, with bio-based routes drawing premium consideration where lifecycle emissions and renewable content are relevant to corporate sustainability goals. Based on Form, the logistics and handling implications of Liquid versus Solid succinic acid influence downstream processing decisions and warehousing requirements. Based on Purity Grade, end users select between Food Grade, Industrial Grade, and Pharmaceutical Grade product streams, each carrying distinct testing, documentation, and traceability demands. Based on Technology, production choices between Chemical Synthesis and Fermentation shape cost structures, capital intensity, and feedstock exposure. Finally, based on Distribution Channel, commercial reach and service models vary across Direct Sales, Distributors, and Online Platforms, affecting lead times, technical support availability, and contract flexibility. Together these segmentation lenses reveal that commercial success depends on aligning product specification, production pathway, and go-to-market model to the nuanced needs of each end-use cluster.
A regional appraisal explaining how distinct regulatory regimes, feedstock access, and industrial demand patterns in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific shape competitive strategy
Regional dynamics shape strategic priorities because feedstock availability, regulatory frameworks, and downstream demand profiles vary notably across global geographies. In the Americas, industrial and pharmaceutical clusters emphasize scale, integrated petrochemical value chains, and growing interest in bio-based alternatives as corporate sustainability targets gain traction. Infrastructure maturity and established logistics corridors support large-volume supply contracts, while innovation pockets concentrate around fermentation scale-up and polymer applications.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency, circularity policies, and incentives for renewable chemistry drive differentiated demand for higher-purity and bio-based succinic acid variants. Industrial innovation centers in Europe increasingly prioritize lifecycle analysis and compliance documentation, and manufacturers in the region often pursue premium positioning through traceability and certification. In the Asia-Pacific region, demand is characterized by a broad base of industrial consumption, fast-growing specialty applications, and diverse supplier ecosystems. Competitive dynamics here reflect a mix of cost-sensitive commodity sourcing and rapidly maturing domestic bio-based capabilities, with cross-border trade flows influenced by regional free trade agreements and localized capacity expansions. Understanding these regional contrasts is essential for designing supply strategies, aligning product portfolios, and prioritizing commercial investments.
An assessment of how producers and innovators are deploying technology, partnerships, and commercial models to secure competitive advantage across commodity and specialty succinic acid segments
Competitors across the succinic acid landscape are pursuing a variety of strategic plays that include technological differentiation, vertical integration, and collaborative partnerships. Leading producers are investing in fermentation strain improvement and process intensification to lower unit costs and secure feedstock flexibility, while others double down on chemical synthesis routes that leverage existing petrochemical infrastructure and raw material access. In parallel, companies are moving to lock in offtake agreements with downstream polymer and pharmaceutical manufacturers, creating tighter commercial linkages that help stabilize demand and support capital investments.
Strategic alliances between biotechnology firms and chemical incumbents are accelerating technology transfer and enabling faster commercialization of bio-based pathways. At the same time, some players are prioritizing product portfolio segmentation to serve both commodity-grade industrial demand and high-margin pharmaceutical or food-grade niches. Investment in quality systems, regulatory compliance, and customer technical service capabilities is becoming a differentiator for those targeting pharmaceutical and food applications. Collectively, these strategic behaviors suggest a competitive environment where scale, technological edge, and go-to-market agility determine the ability to capture higher-value end-use opportunities.
Actionable guidance for manufacturers and buyers focused on securing resilient supply, optimizing raw material choices, and accelerating value capture through technical service and partnerships
Industry leaders can adopt a set of pragmatic actions to protect margins, accelerate innovation, and strengthen supply continuity. First, aligning sourcing strategies with application-specific purity and form requirements while simultaneously qualifying alternate suppliers reduces exposure to trade disruptions and single-point failures. Second, investing selectively in fermentation capabilities or contract-manufacturing relationships can provide strategic optionality between bio-based and petroleum-based routes, particularly for customers prioritizing sustainability credentials. Third, embedding lifecycle and regulatory compliance data into product documentation enhances customer trust and supports premium pricing for verified low-carbon or certified grades.
Moreover, companies should consider advancing technical service offerings that help downstream formulators optimize succinic acid usage in polymers, flavors, and pharmaceutical intermediates, thereby increasing switching costs and reinforcing commercial relationships. Operationally, upgrading logistics planning to manage differences in handling between liquid and solid forms and enhancing inventory visibility across distribution channels will improve responsiveness. Finally, pursuing targeted partnerships for feedstock sourcing, R&D collaborations, and joint commercialization can accelerate time-to-market for differentiated grades and open new co-development pathways with strategic customers.
A transparent description of the qualitative and secondary research methods used to derive insights, including stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and policy verification processes
This analysis synthesizes primary qualitative interviews with industry procurement leaders, technical experts, and process engineers, together with secondary research from publicly available regulatory filings, patent disclosures, company presentations, and trade policy announcements. Primary engagements concentrated on practitioners working across applications such as agriculture, flavors and fragrances, polymers, and pharmaceuticals to surface nuanced specification needs and procurement responses to recent tariff developments.
Where appropriate, findings were cross-validated against technical literature on fermentation and chemical synthesis process economics, as well as documented case studies of industrial polymerization projects that use succinic acid-derived monomers. Data integrity checks included triangulation of supplier claims, verification of technology readiness levels, and confirmation of regulatory requirements for purity grades in food and pharmaceutical contexts. Throughout the methodology, emphasis was placed on qualitative rigor, transparency of sources, and reproducibility of core insights to ensure the analysis supports robust commercial decision-making.
A compelling conclusion emphasizing the strategic choices that will determine which companies thrive as succinic acid use expands across sustainability-focused and high-performance applications
In closing, succinic acid occupies a pivotal role at the confluence of sustainability-driven innovation and traditional industrial chemistry, and stakeholders who proactively align production choices, distribution models, and product specifications will be best positioned to capture emerging value. Technological advances in fermentation, coupled with changing regulatory expectations and application-level differentiation, are creating a bifurcated landscape in which commodity suppliers and high-purity specialists coexist alongside collaborative ventures that bridge the two worlds.
Decision makers should prioritize clarity around end-use specifications, invest in supplier diversification where tariffs and trade uncertainty are present, and pursue targeted capabilities that enable rapid adaptation to customer requirements. By integrating technical service excellence, lifecycle transparency, and strategic partnerships into commercial playbooks, companies can mitigate near-term disruptions and build durable competitive advantage across agriculture, polymers, pharmaceuticals, flavors and other key end markets.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
194 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of advanced bio-refinery platforms for cost-effective bio-based succinic acid production
- 5.2. Expansion of succinic acid applications in biodegradable polyesters and green plasticizers
- 5.3. Strategic partnerships between chemical majors and biotech firms to scale up fermentation processes
- 5.4. Rising demand from food and beverage industry driving development of high-purity food-grade succinic acid
- 5.5. Increasing investments in catalytic conversion technologies to lower production costs of succinic acid
- 5.6. Government incentives accelerating establishment of bio-based succinic acid manufacturing capacity in Asia
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Succinic Acid Market, by Type
- 8.1. Bio Based
- 8.2. Petroleum Based
- 9. Succinic Acid Market, by Form
- 9.1. Liquid
- 9.2. Solid
- 10. Succinic Acid Market, by Purity Grade
- 10.1. Food Grade
- 10.2. Industrial Grade
- 10.3. Pharmaceutical Grade
- 11. Succinic Acid Market, by Technology
- 11.1. Chemical Synthesis
- 11.2. Fermentation
- 12. Succinic Acid Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Direct Sales
- 12.2. Distributors
- 12.3. Online Platforms
- 13. Succinic Acid Market, by Application
- 13.1. Agriculture
- 13.1.1. Pesticide Formulations
- 13.1.2. Plant Growth Regulators
- 13.2. Chemical Intermediates
- 13.3. Cosmetics
- 13.4. Flavors And Fragrances
- 13.4.1. Aroma Chemical
- 13.4.2. Flavoring Compositions
- 13.5. Food And Beverages
- 13.6. Pharmaceuticals
- 13.6.1. Drug Intermediates
- 13.6.2. Excipients
- 13.7. Polymers
- 13.7.1. Polyamide
- 13.7.2. Polybutylene Succinate
- 13.7.3. Unsaturated Polyester Resins
- 13.8. Solvents
- 14. Succinic Acid Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Succinic Acid Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Succinic Acid Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Reverdia B.V.
- 17.3.2. Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Inc.
- 17.3.3. Anhui BBCA Chemicals Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.4. Shandong Sinocycle Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.5. Shandong Susu Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.6. BioAmber Inc.
- 17.3.7. BASF SE
- 17.3.8. Koninklijke DSM N.V.
- 17.3.9. Fuso Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.10. Nippon Shokubai Co. Ltd.
- 17.3.11. Myriant Corporation
- 17.3.12. Kawasaki Kasei Chemicals Ltd.
- 17.3.13. Linyi Lixing Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.14. Gadiv Petrochemical Industries Ltd.
- 17.3.15. Evonik Industries AG
- 17.3.16. Anqing Hexing Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.17. Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corp.
- 17.3.18. TCI Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd.
- 17.3.19. DC Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.20. Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd.
- 17.3.21. Sinopec Yangzi Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.22. Astatech (Chengdu) Biopharmaceutical Corp.
- 17.3.23. SRS Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
- 17.3.24. Shandong Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.25. Shanghai Tongli Bioengineering Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.26. Zhengzhou Tianrun Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.27. Jiangsu Yabang Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.28. Lanzatech, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
