Structural Health Monitoring Market by Offering (Hardware, Services, Software), Monitoring Approach (Active Monitoring, Passive Monitoring), Technology, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Structural Health Monitoring Market was valued at USD 4.72 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.31 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 13.20%, reaching USD 12.73 billion by 2032.
Exploring the Transformative Importance of Structural Health Monitoring in Ensuring Infrastructure Safety Resilience and Operational Efficiency
Structural health monitoring has emerged as an indispensable discipline in modern infrastructure management, combining advanced sensing technologies with real-time analytics to safeguard critical assets. As bridges, buildings, wind turbines, and industrial machinery age, continuous condition assessment becomes central to preventing failures, optimizing maintenance schedules, and extending service life. In this environment, stakeholders must embrace proactive approaches that integrate data-driven insights into their operational workflows.
The convergence of miniaturized sensors, ubiquitous connectivity, and powerful data processing platforms has accelerated the adoption of monitoring systems across sectors. Infrastructure owners can now detect minute changes in stress, vibration, or tilt before they escalate into costly damage. Meanwhile, regulatory bodies and insurers increasingly demand empirical evidence of structural integrity, reinforcing the value proposition of monitoring solutions.
This executive summary serves as an essential guide for decision-makers, providing a holistic overview of market trends, transformational shifts, policy impacts, and segmentation insights. Through rigorous analysis and expert perspectives, it lays the foundation for strategic planning, technology investment, and competitive positioning in the dynamic landscape of structural health management.
Analyzing Key Technological Advancements and Industry Trends Driving the Evolution of Structural Health Monitoring Practices Worldwide
A series of revolutionary technological advances has reshaped the structural health monitoring ecosystem, ushering in an era of unprecedented data accuracy and operational transparency. Internet of Things sensors now offer granular measurements of strain, displacement, and vibration, while wireless networks remove the constraints of cabling, facilitating installations in challenging environments. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms have become indispensable, extracting predictive insights from vast historical datasets to forecast potential failures and guide maintenance strategies.
Meanwhile, digital twins are gaining traction as a means to create virtual replicas of physical assets, enabling scenario testing and performance optimization without risking real-world disruption. Cloud computing platforms allow stakeholders to aggregate and visualize data from disparate locations in a unified dashboard, enhancing collaboration among engineers, operators, and asset managers. As these innovations converge, they drive a shift from periodic inspections to continuous monitoring, reducing downtime and delivering quantifiable safety improvements.
Transitioning from traditional reactive maintenance models to proactive, condition-based frameworks requires organizations to embrace an integrated approach that spans hardware, software, and services. Ultimately, this transformative shift elevates the value of structural health monitoring, positioning it as a strategic enabler of infrastructure longevity and operational excellence.
Assessing the Comprehensive Effects of United States Tariffs Implemented in 2025 on Global Structural Health Monitoring Supply Chains
The imposition of new tariffs by the United States government in 2025 has created ripple effects throughout the global supply chain for structural health monitoring equipment and related services. Components such as accelerometers, displacement sensors, and specialized data acquisition modules have experienced cost increases due to higher import duties on electronic parts and precision instrumentation. As a result, original equipment manufacturers have revisited procurement strategies, seeking domestic suppliers or alternate sourcing hubs to mitigate price pressures.
Service providers face a dual challenge: absorbing incremental costs or passing them to end users, which could slow adoption in budget-constrained projects. In parallel, software vendors have reassessed licensing models to offset hardware price hikes and maintain competitive offerings. The cumulative impact has prompted strategic realignments, with some players accelerating plans for localized manufacturing facilities to reduce tariff exposure.
Despite these headwinds, stakeholders are finding opportunities in tariff-induced market realignments. Collaborative ventures between domestic and international firms have emerged, blending local assembly capabilities with advanced technological expertise. Over time, these adaptations may foster a more resilient supply chain, balancing cost competitiveness with product quality and shortening lead times. Navigating this complex environment requires agility, informed decision-making, and close collaboration among manufacturers, service providers, and end users.
Unveiling Critical Segmentation Parameters That Illuminate Offering Technology Applications and End User Dynamics in Structural Health Monitoring Markets
Analyzing market segmentation provides a clear view of where demand is concentrated and how solution providers can tailor offerings to meet specific needs. The offering dimension divides into hardware, services, and software. Hardware encompasses accelerometers, displacement sensors, inclinometers and tiltmeters, general purpose sensors, and strain gauges, each critical for capturing distinct physical parameters. Services cover pre-installation feasibility studies and post-installation maintenance and calibration, ensuring that systems deliver reliable data over extended lifecycles. Software segments include data management suites for secure storage and retrieval alongside predictive maintenance applications that leverage historical trends to forecast potential failures.
The monitoring approach segmentation distinguishes between active monitoring, which involves injecting signals into structures to measure responses, and passive monitoring, which passively records ambient activity such as wind-induced vibrations. Technological segmentation splits wired and wireless solutions, with wired systems often preferred for high-data-rate requirements and wireless options gaining popularity for their flexible deployment and lower installation costs.
Applications span airframes and wind turbines, bridges and dams, buildings and stadiums, as well as large machines and equipment, reflecting the versatile use cases for structural health monitoring. In terms of end users, aerospace and defense customers demand stringent compliance and precision, the energy sector prioritizes asset uptime, infrastructure managers focus on regulatory adherence, and mining operators emphasize equipment safety in extreme environments. Understanding these segmentation insights enables companies to develop differentiated value propositions and align resources with the fastest-growing market pockets.
Highlighting Regional Dynamics and Growth Drivers Across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific in Structural Health Monitoring
Regional dynamics shape the trajectory of structural health monitoring adoption across the globe, driven by differing infrastructure profiles, regulatory landscapes, and economic priorities. In the Americas, mature markets place a premium on regulatory compliance and preventive maintenance, leading to substantial investments in instrumentation upgrades and comprehensive service contracts. The United States and Canada stand out for their integration of advanced analytics and smart city initiatives.
In Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, a dual narrative unfolds. Western Europe’s aging infrastructure prompts widespread retrofitting and monitoring upgrades, while Gulf Cooperation Council nations invest heavily in large-scale civil projects and energy facilities. Africa’s expanding road and rail networks signal growing opportunities for monitoring deployments, albeit challenged by funding constraints and logistical complexities.
The Asia-Pacific region is characterized by rapid urbanization and extensive infrastructure expansion, particularly in China, India, and Southeast Asia. Urban transit systems, high-rise construction, and renewable energy installations fuel strong demand for wireless sensor networks and cloud-based platforms. Government initiatives that emphasize public safety and disaster resilience further accelerate market uptake, making this region a focal point for vendors seeking high-growth opportunities.
Profiling Leading Companies and Strategic Collaborations Shaping the Competitive Landscape of Structural Health Monitoring Industry
The competitive landscape of structural health monitoring is defined by a mix of established engineering conglomerates and nimble specialized solution providers. Leading manufacturers of sensing hardware continue to enhance sensor sensitivity and reliability, while software firms invest in machine learning capabilities to deliver predictive analytics with higher degrees of accuracy. Strategic partnerships between component suppliers and system integrators have become commonplace, facilitating end-to-end offerings that combine instrumentation, data platforms, and expert services.
Several market participants have pursued mergers and acquisitions to expand their geographic reach and technology portfolios, enabling accelerated entry into adjacent verticals such as aerospace or power generation. Collaborative research initiatives with academic institutions and research laboratories further fuel product innovation, particularly in areas like fiber-optic sensing and digital twin development. Meanwhile, service companies differentiate through bespoke consultancy offerings, leveraging local presence to deliver installation, testing, and training with minimal lead times.
In this dynamic environment, success hinges on the ability to orchestrate complex value chains, ensure interoperability among diverse system components, and provide robust cybersecurity frameworks. Companies that excel in these domains are well positioned to capture market share and establish long-term relationships with major infrastructure owners and operators.
Delivering Actionable Recommendations to Empower Industry Leaders in Driving Innovation and Enhancing Structural Health Monitoring Adoption
Industry leaders must adopt a series of targeted actions to harness the full potential of structural health monitoring and sustain competitive advantage. First, investing in scalable internet of things platforms will allow seamless integration of heterogeneous sensors and data streams, fostering holistic asset management. Concurrently, developing modular hardware architectures can streamline installation processes and reduce maintenance complexity.
Second, forging alliances with cloud service providers and analytics specialists will accelerate the deployment of predictive maintenance solutions, enabling real-time anomaly detection and automated alerting workflows. Leaders should also prioritize the creation of user-centric dashboards and mobile applications to enhance stakeholder engagement and ensure actionable insights are readily accessible on the ground.
Third, expanding local manufacturing or assembly capabilities in key regions will mitigate tariff exposure and shorten supply chain lead times. Coupling this approach with a robust training and certification program for local technicians will strengthen service delivery and customer satisfaction. Finally, embedding cybersecurity protocols throughout the product lifecycle and engaging with regulatory bodies to shape industry standards will cement trust and differentiate offerings in a crowded marketplace.
Explaining the Rigorous Research Methodology Data Collection Analytical Techniques and Quality Assurance Processes Underpinning the Study
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary and secondary techniques to ensure data validity and comprehensive coverage. Primary research entailed in-depth interviews with industry experts, including senior engineers, asset managers, and technology vendors, to capture firsthand perspectives on emerging trends and pain points. Complementing these insights, secondary research drew upon government regulations, technical whitepapers, published case studies, and reputable industry journals to establish a robust contextual framework.
Data collection followed a rigorous protocol, with quantitative inputs sourced from company financial disclosures and industry association reports. Qualitative assessments were validated through cross-referencing multiple expert opinions and triangulating findings across varied geographies and application domains. Analytical techniques encompassed trend analysis, SWOT evaluation, and scenario modeling to explore potential market trajectories under different policy and economic conditions.
Throughout the process, quality assurance measures involved peer reviews, editorial checks, and methodological audits to maintain objectivity and minimize bias. The structured approach ensures that stakeholders can rely on the insights presented here to inform strategic decisions and chart a course for sustained growth in the structural health monitoring sector.
Summarizing the Strategic Imperatives Key Insights and Future Outlook for Structural Health Monitoring Stakeholders to Drive Sustainable Infrastructure Safety
This executive summary has highlighted the strategic imperatives facing stakeholders in the structural health monitoring arena, blending technological advancements with regulatory and market considerations. Core insights underscore the shift from periodic inspections to continuous condition assessment, driven by IoT proliferation, AI-powered analytics, and the emergence of digital twin frameworks. The impact of 2025 tariffs underscores the need for agile supply chain strategies and localized production to preserve cost competitiveness.
Segmentation analysis reveals distinct opportunities in hardware, software, and services, as well as in active versus passive monitoring approaches. Regional dynamics further emphasize that customization and local expertise are vital for success across diverse infrastructure contexts. Leading companies continue to differentiate through technology partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, and targeted R&D investments in sensor innovation and data security.
Looking ahead, the convergence of predictive maintenance, edge computing, and cybersecurity will define the next wave of market evolution. Industry participants that embrace these trends, align with regulatory frameworks, and adopt customer-centric delivery models will capture the greatest value. The insights and recommendations presented herein provide a roadmap for navigating the complex landscape and driving sustainable infrastructure safety advancements.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Exploring the Transformative Importance of Structural Health Monitoring in Ensuring Infrastructure Safety Resilience and Operational Efficiency
Structural health monitoring has emerged as an indispensable discipline in modern infrastructure management, combining advanced sensing technologies with real-time analytics to safeguard critical assets. As bridges, buildings, wind turbines, and industrial machinery age, continuous condition assessment becomes central to preventing failures, optimizing maintenance schedules, and extending service life. In this environment, stakeholders must embrace proactive approaches that integrate data-driven insights into their operational workflows.
The convergence of miniaturized sensors, ubiquitous connectivity, and powerful data processing platforms has accelerated the adoption of monitoring systems across sectors. Infrastructure owners can now detect minute changes in stress, vibration, or tilt before they escalate into costly damage. Meanwhile, regulatory bodies and insurers increasingly demand empirical evidence of structural integrity, reinforcing the value proposition of monitoring solutions.
This executive summary serves as an essential guide for decision-makers, providing a holistic overview of market trends, transformational shifts, policy impacts, and segmentation insights. Through rigorous analysis and expert perspectives, it lays the foundation for strategic planning, technology investment, and competitive positioning in the dynamic landscape of structural health management.
Analyzing Key Technological Advancements and Industry Trends Driving the Evolution of Structural Health Monitoring Practices Worldwide
A series of revolutionary technological advances has reshaped the structural health monitoring ecosystem, ushering in an era of unprecedented data accuracy and operational transparency. Internet of Things sensors now offer granular measurements of strain, displacement, and vibration, while wireless networks remove the constraints of cabling, facilitating installations in challenging environments. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms have become indispensable, extracting predictive insights from vast historical datasets to forecast potential failures and guide maintenance strategies.
Meanwhile, digital twins are gaining traction as a means to create virtual replicas of physical assets, enabling scenario testing and performance optimization without risking real-world disruption. Cloud computing platforms allow stakeholders to aggregate and visualize data from disparate locations in a unified dashboard, enhancing collaboration among engineers, operators, and asset managers. As these innovations converge, they drive a shift from periodic inspections to continuous monitoring, reducing downtime and delivering quantifiable safety improvements.
Transitioning from traditional reactive maintenance models to proactive, condition-based frameworks requires organizations to embrace an integrated approach that spans hardware, software, and services. Ultimately, this transformative shift elevates the value of structural health monitoring, positioning it as a strategic enabler of infrastructure longevity and operational excellence.
Assessing the Comprehensive Effects of United States Tariffs Implemented in 2025 on Global Structural Health Monitoring Supply Chains
The imposition of new tariffs by the United States government in 2025 has created ripple effects throughout the global supply chain for structural health monitoring equipment and related services. Components such as accelerometers, displacement sensors, and specialized data acquisition modules have experienced cost increases due to higher import duties on electronic parts and precision instrumentation. As a result, original equipment manufacturers have revisited procurement strategies, seeking domestic suppliers or alternate sourcing hubs to mitigate price pressures.
Service providers face a dual challenge: absorbing incremental costs or passing them to end users, which could slow adoption in budget-constrained projects. In parallel, software vendors have reassessed licensing models to offset hardware price hikes and maintain competitive offerings. The cumulative impact has prompted strategic realignments, with some players accelerating plans for localized manufacturing facilities to reduce tariff exposure.
Despite these headwinds, stakeholders are finding opportunities in tariff-induced market realignments. Collaborative ventures between domestic and international firms have emerged, blending local assembly capabilities with advanced technological expertise. Over time, these adaptations may foster a more resilient supply chain, balancing cost competitiveness with product quality and shortening lead times. Navigating this complex environment requires agility, informed decision-making, and close collaboration among manufacturers, service providers, and end users.
Unveiling Critical Segmentation Parameters That Illuminate Offering Technology Applications and End User Dynamics in Structural Health Monitoring Markets
Analyzing market segmentation provides a clear view of where demand is concentrated and how solution providers can tailor offerings to meet specific needs. The offering dimension divides into hardware, services, and software. Hardware encompasses accelerometers, displacement sensors, inclinometers and tiltmeters, general purpose sensors, and strain gauges, each critical for capturing distinct physical parameters. Services cover pre-installation feasibility studies and post-installation maintenance and calibration, ensuring that systems deliver reliable data over extended lifecycles. Software segments include data management suites for secure storage and retrieval alongside predictive maintenance applications that leverage historical trends to forecast potential failures.
The monitoring approach segmentation distinguishes between active monitoring, which involves injecting signals into structures to measure responses, and passive monitoring, which passively records ambient activity such as wind-induced vibrations. Technological segmentation splits wired and wireless solutions, with wired systems often preferred for high-data-rate requirements and wireless options gaining popularity for their flexible deployment and lower installation costs.
Applications span airframes and wind turbines, bridges and dams, buildings and stadiums, as well as large machines and equipment, reflecting the versatile use cases for structural health monitoring. In terms of end users, aerospace and defense customers demand stringent compliance and precision, the energy sector prioritizes asset uptime, infrastructure managers focus on regulatory adherence, and mining operators emphasize equipment safety in extreme environments. Understanding these segmentation insights enables companies to develop differentiated value propositions and align resources with the fastest-growing market pockets.
Highlighting Regional Dynamics and Growth Drivers Across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific in Structural Health Monitoring
Regional dynamics shape the trajectory of structural health monitoring adoption across the globe, driven by differing infrastructure profiles, regulatory landscapes, and economic priorities. In the Americas, mature markets place a premium on regulatory compliance and preventive maintenance, leading to substantial investments in instrumentation upgrades and comprehensive service contracts. The United States and Canada stand out for their integration of advanced analytics and smart city initiatives.
In Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, a dual narrative unfolds. Western Europe’s aging infrastructure prompts widespread retrofitting and monitoring upgrades, while Gulf Cooperation Council nations invest heavily in large-scale civil projects and energy facilities. Africa’s expanding road and rail networks signal growing opportunities for monitoring deployments, albeit challenged by funding constraints and logistical complexities.
The Asia-Pacific region is characterized by rapid urbanization and extensive infrastructure expansion, particularly in China, India, and Southeast Asia. Urban transit systems, high-rise construction, and renewable energy installations fuel strong demand for wireless sensor networks and cloud-based platforms. Government initiatives that emphasize public safety and disaster resilience further accelerate market uptake, making this region a focal point for vendors seeking high-growth opportunities.
Profiling Leading Companies and Strategic Collaborations Shaping the Competitive Landscape of Structural Health Monitoring Industry
The competitive landscape of structural health monitoring is defined by a mix of established engineering conglomerates and nimble specialized solution providers. Leading manufacturers of sensing hardware continue to enhance sensor sensitivity and reliability, while software firms invest in machine learning capabilities to deliver predictive analytics with higher degrees of accuracy. Strategic partnerships between component suppliers and system integrators have become commonplace, facilitating end-to-end offerings that combine instrumentation, data platforms, and expert services.
Several market participants have pursued mergers and acquisitions to expand their geographic reach and technology portfolios, enabling accelerated entry into adjacent verticals such as aerospace or power generation. Collaborative research initiatives with academic institutions and research laboratories further fuel product innovation, particularly in areas like fiber-optic sensing and digital twin development. Meanwhile, service companies differentiate through bespoke consultancy offerings, leveraging local presence to deliver installation, testing, and training with minimal lead times.
In this dynamic environment, success hinges on the ability to orchestrate complex value chains, ensure interoperability among diverse system components, and provide robust cybersecurity frameworks. Companies that excel in these domains are well positioned to capture market share and establish long-term relationships with major infrastructure owners and operators.
Delivering Actionable Recommendations to Empower Industry Leaders in Driving Innovation and Enhancing Structural Health Monitoring Adoption
Industry leaders must adopt a series of targeted actions to harness the full potential of structural health monitoring and sustain competitive advantage. First, investing in scalable internet of things platforms will allow seamless integration of heterogeneous sensors and data streams, fostering holistic asset management. Concurrently, developing modular hardware architectures can streamline installation processes and reduce maintenance complexity.
Second, forging alliances with cloud service providers and analytics specialists will accelerate the deployment of predictive maintenance solutions, enabling real-time anomaly detection and automated alerting workflows. Leaders should also prioritize the creation of user-centric dashboards and mobile applications to enhance stakeholder engagement and ensure actionable insights are readily accessible on the ground.
Third, expanding local manufacturing or assembly capabilities in key regions will mitigate tariff exposure and shorten supply chain lead times. Coupling this approach with a robust training and certification program for local technicians will strengthen service delivery and customer satisfaction. Finally, embedding cybersecurity protocols throughout the product lifecycle and engaging with regulatory bodies to shape industry standards will cement trust and differentiate offerings in a crowded marketplace.
Explaining the Rigorous Research Methodology Data Collection Analytical Techniques and Quality Assurance Processes Underpinning the Study
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary and secondary techniques to ensure data validity and comprehensive coverage. Primary research entailed in-depth interviews with industry experts, including senior engineers, asset managers, and technology vendors, to capture firsthand perspectives on emerging trends and pain points. Complementing these insights, secondary research drew upon government regulations, technical whitepapers, published case studies, and reputable industry journals to establish a robust contextual framework.
Data collection followed a rigorous protocol, with quantitative inputs sourced from company financial disclosures and industry association reports. Qualitative assessments were validated through cross-referencing multiple expert opinions and triangulating findings across varied geographies and application domains. Analytical techniques encompassed trend analysis, SWOT evaluation, and scenario modeling to explore potential market trajectories under different policy and economic conditions.
Throughout the process, quality assurance measures involved peer reviews, editorial checks, and methodological audits to maintain objectivity and minimize bias. The structured approach ensures that stakeholders can rely on the insights presented here to inform strategic decisions and chart a course for sustained growth in the structural health monitoring sector.
Summarizing the Strategic Imperatives Key Insights and Future Outlook for Structural Health Monitoring Stakeholders to Drive Sustainable Infrastructure Safety
This executive summary has highlighted the strategic imperatives facing stakeholders in the structural health monitoring arena, blending technological advancements with regulatory and market considerations. Core insights underscore the shift from periodic inspections to continuous condition assessment, driven by IoT proliferation, AI-powered analytics, and the emergence of digital twin frameworks. The impact of 2025 tariffs underscores the need for agile supply chain strategies and localized production to preserve cost competitiveness.
Segmentation analysis reveals distinct opportunities in hardware, software, and services, as well as in active versus passive monitoring approaches. Regional dynamics further emphasize that customization and local expertise are vital for success across diverse infrastructure contexts. Leading companies continue to differentiate through technology partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, and targeted R&D investments in sensor innovation and data security.
Looking ahead, the convergence of predictive maintenance, edge computing, and cybersecurity will define the next wave of market evolution. Industry participants that embrace these trends, align with regulatory frameworks, and adopt customer-centric delivery models will capture the greatest value. The insights and recommendations presented herein provide a roadmap for navigating the complex landscape and driving sustainable infrastructure safety advancements.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
190 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing use of SHM in aging infrastructure to prevent catastrophic failures worldwide
- 5.2. Government regulations mandating SHM for public safety in bridges and dams globally
- 5.3. Increasing adoption of wireless sensors for cost-effective and scalable structural monitoring systems
- 5.4. Integration of AI and machine learning for predictive maintenance in SHM applications
- 5.5. Rising demand for real-time data analytics to enhance structural safety and efficiency
- 5.6. Expansion of SHM in wind energy sector for turbine blade health monitoring
- 5.7. Development of smart cities driving SHM adoption in high-rise buildings and stadiums
- 5.8. Increased investment in R&D for advanced sensors and data acquisition technologies
- 5.9. IoT-enabled SHM systems gaining traction for remote and continuous infrastructure monitoring
- 5.10. Cloud-based SHM platforms revolutionizing data storage, visualization, and remote diagnostics
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Offering
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Accelerometers
- 8.1.2. Displacement Sensors
- 8.1.3. Inclinometers & Tiltmeters
- 8.1.4. Sensors
- 8.1.5. Strain Gauges
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Post-Installation
- 8.2.2. Pre-Installation
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Data Management Software
- 8.3.2. Predictive Maintenance Software
- 9. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Monitoring Approach
- 9.1. Active Monitoring
- 9.2. Passive Monitoring
- 10. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Wired
- 10.2. Wireless
- 11. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Application
- 11.1. Airframes & Wind Turbines
- 11.2. Bridges & Dams
- 11.3. Buildings & Stadiums
- 11.4. Large Machines & Equipment
- 12. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by End User
- 12.1. Aerospace & Defence
- 12.2. Energy
- 12.3. Infrastructure
- 12.4. Mining
- 13. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH
- 16.3.2. James Fisher and Sons PLC
- 16.3.3. Acellent Technologies Inc.
- 16.3.4. AVT Reliability Ltd.
- 16.3.5. Beanair GmbH
- 16.3.6. Bridge Diagnostics
- 16.3.7. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
- 16.3.8. COWI A/S
- 16.3.9. ElastiSense
- 16.3.10. FEAC Engineering P.C.
- 16.3.11. First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Geocomp, Inc.
- 16.3.13. Geokon
- 16.3.14. Infibra Technologies Srl
- 16.3.15. KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Kinemetrics, Inc.
- 16.3.17. National Instruments by Emerson Electric Co
- 16.3.18. Nova Ventures Group Corp.
- 16.3.19. Rst Instruments Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Sensuron LLC
- 16.3.21. Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
- 16.3.22. SGS S.A.
- 16.3.23. SHM Canada Consulting Limited
- 16.3.24. Siemens AG
- 16.3.25. Sisgeo Srl
- 16.3.26. SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
- 16.3.27. Sixense Group
- 16.3.28. Sodis Lab
- 16.3.29. Somni Solutions
- 16.3.30. Xylem Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
