Sporting Goods & Equipment Market by Product Type (Apparel, Ball Sports Equipment, Cycling Equipment), Material Type (Metal, Non-metal), Gender, Sport Type, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Sporting Goods & Equipment Market was valued at USD 649.59 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 688.83 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.47%, reaching USD 1,073.04 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation to the evolving sporting goods ecosystem that frames consumer expectations, supply dynamics, and strategic imperatives for decision-makers
The sporting goods and equipment landscape is undergoing a period of rapid recalibration driven by converging forces that span consumer behavior, supply chain realignment, material innovation, and retail transformation. This introduction synthesizes the structural drivers that matter most to strategy teams, product leaders, and commercial executives who must balance short-term operational resilience with longer-term brand relevance. It sets expectations for what follows by highlighting how product diversity, demographic segmentation, and distribution models interact to shape demand and competitive positioning.
Historically resilient consumption patterns are now intersecting with heightened expectations for performance, sustainability, and digital convenience. As a consequence, companies across the value chain are prioritizing agility in sourcing, investments in sustainable materials, and enhanced direct-to-consumer engagement. These accelerants are not uniform across product types or activities; they vary by apparel categories such as accessories, footwear, and sportswear, and by equipment that ranges from metal-heavy goods to polymer-based items. Given this complexity, leaders must adopt a layered view that integrates product, gender, material, channel, and activity lenses to craft robust strategies. The following sections unpack these dynamics and provide practical insights for navigating the evolving competitive environment.
How digital acceleration, sustainability expectations, supply chain reorientation, and activity-driven demand are reshaping strategic advantage across the industry
Transformative shifts are redefining competitive advantage across the sporting goods sector as technological, social, and regulatory pressures converge. Digital acceleration has moved well beyond transactional e-commerce; brands now deploy data-driven personalization, virtual product trials, and integrated omnichannel experiences that influence product development cycles and inventory decisions. At the same time, sustainability has evolved from a marketing differentiator into a sourcing and R&D priority, prompting brands to re-evaluate materials, packaging, and end-of-life programs in pursuit of verified environmental and social outcomes.
Concurrently, supply chain architecture is shifting in response to geopolitical friction and cost volatility. Companies are adopting diversified supplier networks, investing in regional manufacturing capacity, and in some cases accelerating automation to reduce reliance on labour-cost advantages. Retail formats are also changing; department stores and specialty retailers must contend with increasingly sophisticated direct brand stores and e-commerce marketplaces that offer faster fulfillment, curated assortments, and subscription or rental models. Finally, demand is fragmenting by activity and consumer identity. Interest in traditional team sports remains strong while niche and outdoor activities such as kayaking and water sports are attracting new participants, driving category-specific product innovation. Taken together, these transformative shifts require coordinated strategic responses across product development, channel strategy, and operational execution.
The multifaceted consequences of recent tariff dynamics on supply chains, pricing strategies, inventory decisions, and competitive positioning through 2025
The cumulative effect of tariff policy changes in the United States through 2025 has prompted tangible adjustments in supplier choices, pricing approaches, and inventory strategies across global sporting goods supply chains. For product lines with significant metal content, duties elevated input costs and encouraged manufacturers and retailers to re-assess sourcing footprints and cost pass-through mechanisms. In response, several leaders pursued a combination of nearshoring, renegotiated supplier agreements, and product redesigns that reduce tariff exposure by minimizing taxable inputs or shifting to alternative materials where performance trade-offs were acceptable.
Beyond direct cost effects, tariffs exerted secondary pressures by accelerating inventory rationalization and prompting higher levels of safety stock in certain regions to hedge against trade disruptions. These actions increased working capital requirements and forced sharper trade-off analyses between inventory carrying costs and service-level commitments. On the retail front, the tariff environment influenced channel strategies: brands with strong direct-to-consumer capabilities leaned on digital channels to preserve margins, while omnichannel players used price promotions selectively to maintain shelf velocity in offline stores. The regulatory backdrop also altered competitive dynamics; firms with vertically integrated manufacturing and robust material substitution roadmaps gained relative advantage, whereas companies relying on long-established, tariff-sensitive supply routes faced more acute margin compression. Looking forward, sustained policy uncertainty will likely keep sourcing flexibility, product modularity, and automation investment near the top of strategic agendas.
A layered segmentation framework that connects product categories, gendered preferences, material constraints, distribution models, and diverse activity demands
Segmentation illuminates where opportunities and vulnerabilities intersect across product, gender, material, distribution, and activity dimensions. When viewed through the lens of product, the industry differentiates between apparel and equipment with apparel subdivided into accessories, footwear, and sportswear; each subcategory exhibits distinct innovation cycles and margin profiles. Accessories often prioritize functionality and low unit cost, footwear demands specialized materials and fit engineering, and sportswear combines performance textiles with brand-led design, meaning each requires tailored go-to-market tactics and inventory planning. Looking at gender, men’s and women’s segments increasingly diverge not only in fit and aesthetics but in purchasing drivers, with women showing stronger preference for multi-purpose and lifestyle-integrated offerings that blur training and everyday use.
Material type further stratifies risk and opportunity. Metal components are subject to different supply chain constraints and tariff sensitivities compared with non-metal materials such as composites, polymers, and performance textiles. Firms that can innovate on material substitution or improve recyclability gain resilience and sustainability credibility. Distribution channels are evolving in parallel: offline stores, which include department stores and specialty retailers, remain critical for discovery and tactile evaluation, while online channels, including direct brand stores and e-commerce marketplaces, drive convenience and data capture. Activity type shapes product specification and seasonality; segments spanning American football, badminton, baseball, basketball, boxing, golf, hockey, kayaking, racquet sports, soccer, squash, surfing, swimming, tennis, and water sports each possess unique equipment requirements, regulatory standards, and participation cycles that inform product development, marketing focus, and inventory cadence. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a practical framework for prioritizing investments, allocating distribution capacity, and aligning product roadmaps with consumer preferences and operational realities.
Regional differentiation in consumer behavior, retail infrastructure, and supply chain realities that dictates tailored strategies across global territories
Regional dynamics continue to drive differentiated growth patterns and competitive strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Consumer expectations, retail infrastructure, and participation trends vary significantly; in the Americas, strong direct-to-consumer adoption and a mature sporting culture favor premiumization in established categories while also enabling rapid scale for digitally native brands. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulation, sustainability mandates, and a dense retail network create both complexity and opportunity for brands that can localize assortments and meet stricter environmental standards. Asia-Pacific remains a focal point for manufacturing capability, rapid urbanization, and a growing middle class with rising discretionary spend on both lifestyle-oriented sportswear and specialist equipment.
These regional distinctions influence strategic priorities such as where to locate inventory, which channels to prioritize for expansion, and how to tailor product assortments for regional tastes and regulatory environments. For example, regions with high outdoor activity participation require robust supplies of water sports and hiking equipment, while urbanized markets emphasize versatile sportswear and compact training equipment. Moreover, regional tariff regimes, logistics infrastructure, and retail partner ecosystems shape the optimal balance between centralized production and localized assembly. Therefore, companies must apply a geographically nuanced approach to supply chain design, marketing segmentation, and retail partnerships to capture regional demand while controlling operational complexity.
How incumbent global brands, vertically integrated manufacturers, digitally native challengers, and material innovators are reshaping competitive dynamics
Competitive landscapes are being redefined by a mix of incumbent global brands, vertically integrated manufacturers, digitally native challengers, and specialty innovators. Established players leverage scale, distribution partnerships, and long-standing brand equity to defend premium segments, but they are concurrently investing in agility programs, private label capabilities, and collaborative partnerships with material science firms to sustain differentiation. Vertically integrated manufacturers that control both production and design are capitalizing on reduced lead times and enhanced quality control, enabling faster iterations and bespoke product programs for partners and retailers.
Simultaneously, direct-to-consumer entrants and digitally native brands are disrupting traditional channels through superior customer experiences, targeted community building, and nimble assortment strategies. These challengers often focus on narrowly defined activity niches or sustainability-first value propositions, which enables higher loyalty among specific consumer cohorts. Specialty innovators, including material suppliers and performance technology firms, are reshaping product roadmaps by introducing new composites, recycled fibers, and sensor-enabled equipment. Collectively, these company archetypes create a dynamic ecosystem in which collaboration, strategic partnerships, and targeted M&A are common as organizations seek complementary capabilities to accelerate time-to-market and improve margin resilience.
Actionable strategic priorities for leaders to balance resilience, profitability, and growth while addressing supply and demand fragmentation across the value chain
Industry leaders should pursue a set of coordinated actions that balance resilience with growth orientation and capitalize on the shifting demand landscape. First, prioritize supply chain flexibility by diversifying supplier bases, investing in nearshoring where economics permit, and designing product families that allow modular substitution of tariff-sensitive components. This approach reduces single-source dependency while preserving the ability to react quickly to policy shifts and logistics disruptions. Second, accelerate material innovation and circularity initiatives to meet consumer expectations and to create durable cost advantages through reduced reliance on high-tariff inputs.
Third, align channel strategies to the strengths of each distribution path: deepen relationships with department stores and specialty retailers for discovery and experiential retail, while scaling direct brand platforms and marketplace partnerships for repeat purchase and data-driven personalization. Fourth, adopt an activity-informed product strategy that tailors assortments to participation trends across American football, racquet sports, water sports, and other focus areas, prioritizing SKU rationalization where it reduces complexity without sacrificing consumer choice. Fifth, invest in digital tools that improve demand sensing, inventory optimization, and omnichannel fulfillment to lower working capital intensity and improve service levels. Finally, embed scenario planning into strategic reviews so leadership teams can test the financial and operational implications of tariff shifts, regional demand swings, and supplier disruptions. Together, these actions create a pragmatic roadmap that supports profitable growth and operational resilience.
A transparent, multi-source methodology combining executive interviews, trade analysis, and transactional indicators to validate strategic insights and scenarios
This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs through a structured methodology that triangulates primary interviews, retailer observations, and aggregated transactional data to generate robust insights. Primary research included structured interviews with product leaders, supply chain executives, retail buyers, and material specialists to surface operational realities, strategic priorities, and innovation pipelines. Secondary inputs consisted of trade flow analysis, publicly available regulatory filings, and category-level retail performance indicators to contextualize primary findings and validate emerging trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation across data sources and scenario analysis to test sensitivity to key variables such as tariffs, material availability, and channel shifts. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and documents data provenance for each major insight, enabling stakeholders to trace conclusions back to source inputs. Where applicable, segmentation and regional analyses were calibrated using participation and consumption patterns, distribution channel metrics, and supplier footprints to ensure practical relevance for commercial decision-making.
A decisive summary underscoring the imperative for supply chain agility, material innovation, and channel alignment to secure long-term competitive advantage
In conclusion, the sporting goods and equipment landscape is at an inflection point where strategic agility, material innovation, and channel sophistication determine market leadership. Companies that invest in flexible supply chain architectures, adopt sustainable material pathways, and tailor channel strategies to regional and activity-specific demand will be best positioned to capture long-term value. Tariff-related pressures have amplified the need for contingency planning and supplier diversification, while digital capabilities continue to elevate the importance of first-party data and direct consumer relationships.
Ultimately, success will hinge on integrating operational resilience with consumer-centric product development and thoughtful regional execution. Firms that align their R&D, sourcing, and commercial priorities around these principles will be able to navigate near-term turbulence while building foundations for sustained competitiveness.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation to the evolving sporting goods ecosystem that frames consumer expectations, supply dynamics, and strategic imperatives for decision-makers
The sporting goods and equipment landscape is undergoing a period of rapid recalibration driven by converging forces that span consumer behavior, supply chain realignment, material innovation, and retail transformation. This introduction synthesizes the structural drivers that matter most to strategy teams, product leaders, and commercial executives who must balance short-term operational resilience with longer-term brand relevance. It sets expectations for what follows by highlighting how product diversity, demographic segmentation, and distribution models interact to shape demand and competitive positioning.
Historically resilient consumption patterns are now intersecting with heightened expectations for performance, sustainability, and digital convenience. As a consequence, companies across the value chain are prioritizing agility in sourcing, investments in sustainable materials, and enhanced direct-to-consumer engagement. These accelerants are not uniform across product types or activities; they vary by apparel categories such as accessories, footwear, and sportswear, and by equipment that ranges from metal-heavy goods to polymer-based items. Given this complexity, leaders must adopt a layered view that integrates product, gender, material, channel, and activity lenses to craft robust strategies. The following sections unpack these dynamics and provide practical insights for navigating the evolving competitive environment.
How digital acceleration, sustainability expectations, supply chain reorientation, and activity-driven demand are reshaping strategic advantage across the industry
Transformative shifts are redefining competitive advantage across the sporting goods sector as technological, social, and regulatory pressures converge. Digital acceleration has moved well beyond transactional e-commerce; brands now deploy data-driven personalization, virtual product trials, and integrated omnichannel experiences that influence product development cycles and inventory decisions. At the same time, sustainability has evolved from a marketing differentiator into a sourcing and R&D priority, prompting brands to re-evaluate materials, packaging, and end-of-life programs in pursuit of verified environmental and social outcomes.
Concurrently, supply chain architecture is shifting in response to geopolitical friction and cost volatility. Companies are adopting diversified supplier networks, investing in regional manufacturing capacity, and in some cases accelerating automation to reduce reliance on labour-cost advantages. Retail formats are also changing; department stores and specialty retailers must contend with increasingly sophisticated direct brand stores and e-commerce marketplaces that offer faster fulfillment, curated assortments, and subscription or rental models. Finally, demand is fragmenting by activity and consumer identity. Interest in traditional team sports remains strong while niche and outdoor activities such as kayaking and water sports are attracting new participants, driving category-specific product innovation. Taken together, these transformative shifts require coordinated strategic responses across product development, channel strategy, and operational execution.
The multifaceted consequences of recent tariff dynamics on supply chains, pricing strategies, inventory decisions, and competitive positioning through 2025
The cumulative effect of tariff policy changes in the United States through 2025 has prompted tangible adjustments in supplier choices, pricing approaches, and inventory strategies across global sporting goods supply chains. For product lines with significant metal content, duties elevated input costs and encouraged manufacturers and retailers to re-assess sourcing footprints and cost pass-through mechanisms. In response, several leaders pursued a combination of nearshoring, renegotiated supplier agreements, and product redesigns that reduce tariff exposure by minimizing taxable inputs or shifting to alternative materials where performance trade-offs were acceptable.
Beyond direct cost effects, tariffs exerted secondary pressures by accelerating inventory rationalization and prompting higher levels of safety stock in certain regions to hedge against trade disruptions. These actions increased working capital requirements and forced sharper trade-off analyses between inventory carrying costs and service-level commitments. On the retail front, the tariff environment influenced channel strategies: brands with strong direct-to-consumer capabilities leaned on digital channels to preserve margins, while omnichannel players used price promotions selectively to maintain shelf velocity in offline stores. The regulatory backdrop also altered competitive dynamics; firms with vertically integrated manufacturing and robust material substitution roadmaps gained relative advantage, whereas companies relying on long-established, tariff-sensitive supply routes faced more acute margin compression. Looking forward, sustained policy uncertainty will likely keep sourcing flexibility, product modularity, and automation investment near the top of strategic agendas.
A layered segmentation framework that connects product categories, gendered preferences, material constraints, distribution models, and diverse activity demands
Segmentation illuminates where opportunities and vulnerabilities intersect across product, gender, material, distribution, and activity dimensions. When viewed through the lens of product, the industry differentiates between apparel and equipment with apparel subdivided into accessories, footwear, and sportswear; each subcategory exhibits distinct innovation cycles and margin profiles. Accessories often prioritize functionality and low unit cost, footwear demands specialized materials and fit engineering, and sportswear combines performance textiles with brand-led design, meaning each requires tailored go-to-market tactics and inventory planning. Looking at gender, men’s and women’s segments increasingly diverge not only in fit and aesthetics but in purchasing drivers, with women showing stronger preference for multi-purpose and lifestyle-integrated offerings that blur training and everyday use.
Material type further stratifies risk and opportunity. Metal components are subject to different supply chain constraints and tariff sensitivities compared with non-metal materials such as composites, polymers, and performance textiles. Firms that can innovate on material substitution or improve recyclability gain resilience and sustainability credibility. Distribution channels are evolving in parallel: offline stores, which include department stores and specialty retailers, remain critical for discovery and tactile evaluation, while online channels, including direct brand stores and e-commerce marketplaces, drive convenience and data capture. Activity type shapes product specification and seasonality; segments spanning American football, badminton, baseball, basketball, boxing, golf, hockey, kayaking, racquet sports, soccer, squash, surfing, swimming, tennis, and water sports each possess unique equipment requirements, regulatory standards, and participation cycles that inform product development, marketing focus, and inventory cadence. Taken together, these segmentation lenses provide a practical framework for prioritizing investments, allocating distribution capacity, and aligning product roadmaps with consumer preferences and operational realities.
Regional differentiation in consumer behavior, retail infrastructure, and supply chain realities that dictates tailored strategies across global territories
Regional dynamics continue to drive differentiated growth patterns and competitive strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Consumer expectations, retail infrastructure, and participation trends vary significantly; in the Americas, strong direct-to-consumer adoption and a mature sporting culture favor premiumization in established categories while also enabling rapid scale for digitally native brands. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulation, sustainability mandates, and a dense retail network create both complexity and opportunity for brands that can localize assortments and meet stricter environmental standards. Asia-Pacific remains a focal point for manufacturing capability, rapid urbanization, and a growing middle class with rising discretionary spend on both lifestyle-oriented sportswear and specialist equipment.
These regional distinctions influence strategic priorities such as where to locate inventory, which channels to prioritize for expansion, and how to tailor product assortments for regional tastes and regulatory environments. For example, regions with high outdoor activity participation require robust supplies of water sports and hiking equipment, while urbanized markets emphasize versatile sportswear and compact training equipment. Moreover, regional tariff regimes, logistics infrastructure, and retail partner ecosystems shape the optimal balance between centralized production and localized assembly. Therefore, companies must apply a geographically nuanced approach to supply chain design, marketing segmentation, and retail partnerships to capture regional demand while controlling operational complexity.
How incumbent global brands, vertically integrated manufacturers, digitally native challengers, and material innovators are reshaping competitive dynamics
Competitive landscapes are being redefined by a mix of incumbent global brands, vertically integrated manufacturers, digitally native challengers, and specialty innovators. Established players leverage scale, distribution partnerships, and long-standing brand equity to defend premium segments, but they are concurrently investing in agility programs, private label capabilities, and collaborative partnerships with material science firms to sustain differentiation. Vertically integrated manufacturers that control both production and design are capitalizing on reduced lead times and enhanced quality control, enabling faster iterations and bespoke product programs for partners and retailers.
Simultaneously, direct-to-consumer entrants and digitally native brands are disrupting traditional channels through superior customer experiences, targeted community building, and nimble assortment strategies. These challengers often focus on narrowly defined activity niches or sustainability-first value propositions, which enables higher loyalty among specific consumer cohorts. Specialty innovators, including material suppliers and performance technology firms, are reshaping product roadmaps by introducing new composites, recycled fibers, and sensor-enabled equipment. Collectively, these company archetypes create a dynamic ecosystem in which collaboration, strategic partnerships, and targeted M&A are common as organizations seek complementary capabilities to accelerate time-to-market and improve margin resilience.
Actionable strategic priorities for leaders to balance resilience, profitability, and growth while addressing supply and demand fragmentation across the value chain
Industry leaders should pursue a set of coordinated actions that balance resilience with growth orientation and capitalize on the shifting demand landscape. First, prioritize supply chain flexibility by diversifying supplier bases, investing in nearshoring where economics permit, and designing product families that allow modular substitution of tariff-sensitive components. This approach reduces single-source dependency while preserving the ability to react quickly to policy shifts and logistics disruptions. Second, accelerate material innovation and circularity initiatives to meet consumer expectations and to create durable cost advantages through reduced reliance on high-tariff inputs.
Third, align channel strategies to the strengths of each distribution path: deepen relationships with department stores and specialty retailers for discovery and experiential retail, while scaling direct brand platforms and marketplace partnerships for repeat purchase and data-driven personalization. Fourth, adopt an activity-informed product strategy that tailors assortments to participation trends across American football, racquet sports, water sports, and other focus areas, prioritizing SKU rationalization where it reduces complexity without sacrificing consumer choice. Fifth, invest in digital tools that improve demand sensing, inventory optimization, and omnichannel fulfillment to lower working capital intensity and improve service levels. Finally, embed scenario planning into strategic reviews so leadership teams can test the financial and operational implications of tariff shifts, regional demand swings, and supplier disruptions. Together, these actions create a pragmatic roadmap that supports profitable growth and operational resilience.
A transparent, multi-source methodology combining executive interviews, trade analysis, and transactional indicators to validate strategic insights and scenarios
This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs through a structured methodology that triangulates primary interviews, retailer observations, and aggregated transactional data to generate robust insights. Primary research included structured interviews with product leaders, supply chain executives, retail buyers, and material specialists to surface operational realities, strategic priorities, and innovation pipelines. Secondary inputs consisted of trade flow analysis, publicly available regulatory filings, and category-level retail performance indicators to contextualize primary findings and validate emerging trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation across data sources and scenario analysis to test sensitivity to key variables such as tariffs, material availability, and channel shifts. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and documents data provenance for each major insight, enabling stakeholders to trace conclusions back to source inputs. Where applicable, segmentation and regional analyses were calibrated using participation and consumption patterns, distribution channel metrics, and supplier footprints to ensure practical relevance for commercial decision-making.
A decisive summary underscoring the imperative for supply chain agility, material innovation, and channel alignment to secure long-term competitive advantage
In conclusion, the sporting goods and equipment landscape is at an inflection point where strategic agility, material innovation, and channel sophistication determine market leadership. Companies that invest in flexible supply chain architectures, adopt sustainable material pathways, and tailor channel strategies to regional and activity-specific demand will be best positioned to capture long-term value. Tariff-related pressures have amplified the need for contingency planning and supplier diversification, while digital capabilities continue to elevate the importance of first-party data and direct consumer relationships.
Ultimately, success will hinge on integrating operational resilience with consumer-centric product development and thoughtful regional execution. Firms that align their R&D, sourcing, and commercial priorities around these principles will be able to navigate near-term turbulence while building foundations for sustained competitiveness.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
191 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing demand for sustainable materials in performance athletic footwear
- 5.2. Integration of wearable fitness trackers into team sports training and analytics
- 5.3. Surge in at-home smart exercise equipment with interactive virtual coaching
- 5.4. Adoption of eco friendly manufacturing processes across major sporting brands
- 5.5. Rising popularity of customizable 3d printed protective gear for contact sports
- 5.6. Expansion of direct-to-consumer sales channels by niche fitness equipment startups
- 5.7. Incorporation of augmented reality features into golf and tennis training devices
- 5.8. Development of smart apparel with biometric sensors for real time performance feedback
- 5.9. Increasing collaborations between esports platforms and traditional sports equipment manufacturers
- 5.10. Shift towards multifunctional outdoor gear designed for urban adventure and commuting
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Apparel
- 8.1.1. Accessories
- 8.1.1.1. Caps & Hats
- 8.1.1.2. Gloves
- 8.1.1.3. Headbands
- 8.1.1.4. Socks
- 8.1.1.5. Wristbands
- 8.1.2. Performance Wear
- 8.1.3. Specialized Gear
- 8.1.4. Sportswear
- 8.1.4.1. Hoodies
- 8.1.4.2. Jerseys
- 8.1.4.3. Shorts
- 8.1.4.4. T-shirts
- 8.1.4.5. Tracksuits
- 8.2. Ball Sports Equipment
- 8.3. Cycling Equipment
- 8.3.1. Bicycles
- 8.3.2. Cycling Parts
- 8.3.3. Safety & Accessories
- 8.4. Fitness Equipment
- 8.4.1. Cardio Equipment
- 8.4.1.1. Elliptical Machines
- 8.4.1.2. Rowing Machines
- 8.4.1.3. Stationary Bikes
- 8.4.1.4. Treadmills
- 8.4.2. Free Weights
- 8.4.2.1. Barbells
- 8.4.2.2. Dumbbells
- 8.4.2.3. Kettlebells
- 8.4.2.4. Plates
- 8.4.3. Resistance & Bodyweight Training
- 8.4.4. Strength Training Equipment
- 8.4.5. Yoga & Pilates Equipment
- 8.5. Footwear
- 8.5.1. Court Shoes
- 8.5.2. Hiking Boots
- 8.5.3. Running Shoes
- 8.5.4. Water Shoes
- 8.6. Outdoor & Adventure Gear
- 8.6.1. Camping Equipment
- 8.6.1.1. Camping Stoves
- 8.6.1.2. Lanterns
- 8.6.1.3. Sleeping Bags
- 8.6.1.4. Tents
- 8.6.2. Climbing Equipment
- 8.6.2.1. Carabiners
- 8.6.2.2. Harnesses
- 8.6.2.3. Ropes
- 8.6.3. Hiking Equipment
- 8.6.4. Hunting & Fishing Gear
- 8.7. Water Sports Equipment
- 8.8. Winter Sports Equipment
- 9. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Material Type
- 9.1. Metal
- 9.1.1. Aluminum
- 9.1.2. Carbon Steel Alloys
- 9.1.3. Steel
- 9.1.4. Titanium
- 9.2. Non-metal
- 9.2.1. Composites
- 9.2.2. Foam Materials
- 9.2.3. Natural Fibers
- 9.2.4. Polymers & Plastics
- 9.2.5. Rubber & Elastomers
- 10. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Gender
- 10.1. Men
- 10.2. Women
- 11. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Sport Type
- 11.1. Endurance Sports
- 11.1.1. Cycling
- 11.1.2. Running
- 11.1.3. Triathlon
- 11.2. Individual Sports
- 11.2.1. Boxing
- 11.2.2. Squash
- 11.2.3. Tennis
- 11.3. Outdoor Recreation
- 11.3.1. Camping
- 11.3.2. Fishing
- 11.3.3. Hiking
- 11.4. Team Sports
- 11.4.1. Baseball
- 11.4.2. Basketball
- 11.4.3. Football
- 11.4.4. Hockey
- 11.4.5. Rugby
- 11.5. Water Sports
- 11.5.1. Diving
- 11.5.2. Surfing
- 11.5.3. Swimming
- 11.6. Winter Sports
- 11.6.1. Ice Hockey
- 11.6.2. Skiing
- 11.6.3. Snowboarding
- 12. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline Stores
- 12.1.1. Department Stores
- 12.1.2. Specialty Sports Stores
- 12.2. Online Stores
- 12.2.1. Company Website
- 12.2.2. eCommerce Website
- 13. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Sporting Goods & Equipment Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Adidas AG
- 16.3.2. Amer Sports
- 16.3.3. ASICS Corporation
- 16.3.4. Brunswick Corporation
- 16.3.5. Callaway Brands Corp.
- 16.3.6. Columbia Sportswear Company
- 16.3.7. Decathlon Sports India Private Limited
- 16.3.8. Durable Products Australia Pty Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Escalade Inc.
- 16.3.10. First Team Inc.
- 16.3.11. Fischer Sports GmbH
- 16.3.12. HEAD Sport GmbH
- 16.3.13. Johnson Outdoors Inc.
- 16.3.14. MacGregor Golf
- 16.3.15. Mizuno Corporation
- 16.3.16. New Balance Athletics, Inc.
- 16.3.17. Nike, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Puma SE
- 16.3.19. Race Sporting Goods
- 16.3.20. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.
- 16.3.21. Rossignol Group
- 16.3.22. Schäper Sportgerätebau GmbH
- 16.3.23. Sumitomo Rubber Industries Limited
- 16.3.24. Trek Bicycle Corporation
- 16.3.25. True Temper Sports
- 16.3.26. Under Armour, Inc.
- 16.3.27. Yonex Co., Ltd
- 16.3.28. DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
- 16.3.29. Anta Sports America Inc.
- 16.3.30. SKECHERS USA, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
