Space Propellant Tank Market by Material Type (Carbon Fiber, Metallic Alloys), Insulation Type (Foam Insulation, Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI)), Propellant Type, Capacity, Platform, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Space On-board Computing Platform Market was valued at USD 1.64 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.97 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 20.01%, reaching USD 7.08 billion by 2032.
An authoritative framing of how advances in on-board computing reshape spacecraft capability, program trade-offs, and mission-level decision making across modern space initiatives
Spaceborne on-board computing platforms are a foundational enabler of modern mission capability, powering everything from telemetry and telecommand to autonomous navigation and payload processing. Over the last decade, advances in processor design, software architectures, and miniaturization have shifted computing from a supporting role to a determinative element of mission architecture. As systems become more capable, they unlock new operational paradigms such as autonomous operations, in-orbit data reduction, and distributed mission architectures that alter how spacecraft are designed, integrated, and sustained.
This introduction frames on-board computing not merely as a component but as a platform-level design variable that influences launch mass, power budgets, thermal management, and lifecycle sustainment. Consequently, engineering teams must reconcile performance objectives with constraints imposed by radiation environments, latency requirements, and interoperability across constellations. By situating computing capability at the heart of mission trade studies, program leaders can better prioritize investments that deliver the greatest operational return.
Throughout this summary, technical drivers and commercial dynamics are examined with the objective of equipping decision-makers with a concise, actionable understanding of how computing choices cascade into systems-level consequences and strategic opportunities.
A comprehensive view of the multi-dimensional shifts transforming on-board computing hardware and software, altering operational norms and procurement priorities across space programs
The landscape for on-board computing is undergoing transformative shifts that span hardware, software, and operational doctrine. Hardware-wise, the industry is seeing a widening adoption of heterogeneous processing stacks that combine radiation-tolerant CPU cores, GPUs for parallel workloads, and specialized accelerators for AI inferencing. Meanwhile, software is moving toward containerized, modular flight stacks that separate payload processing from critical flight functions, enabling faster feature delivery and post-launch updates when validated by rigorous assurance processes.
Operationally, the rise of large low-Earth orbit constellations and proliferated low-cost missions has increased the premium on compute efficiency, autonomy, and interoperable communications. Edge processing is becoming a default design choice to reduce downlink dependency, while cloud-integrated testbeds allow ground teams to develop, validate, and iterate software closer to operational environments. In parallel, cybersecurity and supply chain resilience have emerged as non-functional imperatives that shape procurement specifications and contractor selection. These shifts collectively reframe computing platforms as dynamic assets that are iteratively improved during a mission lifecycle rather than static equipment that remains unchanged after launch.
An evidence-based examination of how evolving tariff policies are reshaping sourcing strategies, supplier footprints, and design modularity for resilient on-board computing programs
Recent tariff actions and trade policy changes have introduced new variables into procurement planning and supply chain architecture for space systems. Tariff adjustments on electronic components, specialized processors, and high-reliability parts can alter cost structures and incentivize greater localization or diversification of suppliers. As a consequence, engineering and sourcing teams are increasingly incorporating tariff sensitivity analyses into supplier selection, often favoring multi-sourcing strategies to mitigate exposure and preserve program schedules.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs influence supplier roadmaps and partner ecosystems. Semiconductor manufacturers and subsystem integrators may recalibrate production footprints and partnership agreements in response to trade barriers, which in turn affects lead times for radiation-hardened components and tested flight-grade assemblies. Program managers must therefore account for potential shifts in component availability and qualification timelines when developing integration schedules.
In response, mature programs are emphasizing design modularity and interface standardization so that functional replacements can be qualified with minimal rework. This approach reduces single-source dependency and allows teams to pivot suppliers without destabilizing software interfaces or thermal and power envelopes. Overall, trade policy dynamics are prompting a strategic refinement of sourcing frameworks and design practices to preserve resilience while maintaining technical performance.
A strategically structured segmentation analysis that clarifies system-level trade-offs across system types, end uses, processor classes, and architectural paradigms with practical implications for program design
Segmentation of the on-board computing domain reveals where technical investments and program priorities tend to cluster. Based on system type, the market is studied across Communication Systems, Flight Control Systems, Navigation Systems, Onboard Data Handling, and Power Management Systems, with Communication Systems further examined across Inter Satellite Links, Telecommand, and Telemetry while Navigation Systems are analyzed across GNSS, Inertial Measurement Units, and Star Trackers. These distinctions matter because the computational profiles for high-throughput telemetry differ markedly from those required by precision navigation or attitude control, leading to divergent hardware and software optimization strategies.
Based on end use, the market is studied across Launch Vehicles, Satellites, Space Stations, and Unmanned Rovers. Each end use imposes unique constraints: launch vehicles emphasize shock and transient tolerance, satellites balance power and thermal constraints for long-duration missions, space stations prioritize maintainability and upgradeability, and unmanned rovers demand rugged autonomy for surface operations. Based on processor type, the market is studied across Commercial Off The Shelf Processors and Radiation Hardened Processors, which highlights a central trade-off between performance-per-dollar and resilience in harsh radiation environments.
Based on architecture, the market is studied across Centralized Architecture and Distributed Architecture, with Centralized Architecture further dissected into Mainframe Based and Single Unit implementations and Distributed Architecture covering Cloud Integrated and Edge Processing approaches. Architectural choices influence how workloads are partitioned, how redundancy is implemented, and how software is validated, all of which have cascading implications for integration complexity, verification effort, and mission assurance.
A nuanced regional assessment revealing how geopolitical and industrial ecosystems in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific uniquely influence computing platform strategies and procurement behaviors
Regional dynamics shape technology adoption patterns, industrial ecosystems, and policy drivers that in turn influence platform design choices. In the Americas, a strong civil and commercial ecosystem supports rapid iteration of smallsat and constellation concepts, driven by accessible venture capital and an established base of aerospace primes and mission integrators. This environment fosters aggressive adoption of edge processing, software-defined payloads, and commercial off-the-shelf processing elements where assurance strategies permit.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of national programs, multinational consortia, and growing commercial activity. Emphasis in this region often centers on standards harmonization, cross-border partnerships, and sovereign capability development. These factors contribute to demand for architectures that prioritize interoperability, sustained in-orbit support, and compliance with national security procurement frameworks. In contrast, Asia-Pacific encompasses a rapidly expanding manufacturing base, increasing investments in indigenous semiconductor capability, and diverse mission profiles that range from lunar exploration to dense LEO constellations. Program leaders in this region emphasize scale, cost control, and integration of localized supply chains, which influences choices around processor sourcing, board-level design, and certification pathways.
Taken together, regional differences create an operational landscape where program priorities-whether rapid iteration, sovereign resilience, or manufacturing scale-drive distinct trajectories for on-board computing adoption and architectural preference.
Insight into how diverse industry players are aligning roadmaps, partnerships, and qualification strategies to deliver reliable and upgradeable on-board computing solutions for modern missions
Companies operating in the on-board computing ecosystem are adapting by aligning technology roadmaps with platform-level requirements and by forging partnerships that accelerate qualification pathways. Prime contractors and subsystem integrators are increasingly embedding software and services into hardware offers, seeking to capture greater lifecycle value through maintenance, updates, and mission analytics. At the same time, semiconductor suppliers and module makers are investing in radiation mitigation strategies and modular form factors that simplify integration for systems integrators and final assemblers.
Emerging firms and start-ups are carving niches by delivering specialized accelerators for AI workloads, compact avionics suites, and high-efficiency power management modules that reduce overall systems mass and power consumption. Meanwhile, established defense and aerospace suppliers are expanding their ecosystems to include commercial partners and cloud providers to support hybrid on-board/ground processing paradigms. Across the spectrum, companies prioritize demonstrable flight heritage, standards compliance, and a clear pathway to qualification, recognizing that long-term program adoption depends as much on proven reliability as on feature sets.
Strategic alliances, licensing arrangements, and testbed collaborations are therefore becoming the primary mechanisms through which firms de-risk technology maturation while accelerating customer adoption in a risk-averse procurement environment.
Actionable strategies for program leaders to embed modularity, qualification rigor, and supply chain diversification into on-board computing programs to reduce risk and accelerate capability delivery
Leaders should begin by embedding resilience and modularity into their platform architectures so that supplier substitutions and iterative software updates can be executed without destabilizing mission-critical interfaces. This requires disciplined interface definitions, standardized middleware, and a layered assurance strategy that separates critical flight functions from less critical payload processing. By doing so, programs reduce the cost and schedule risk associated with component obsolescence and supply chain shifts.
Second, invest in qualification pathways for heterogeneous processing elements and accelerators, including targeted test programs that validate performance under representative radiation and thermal regimes. Complementing this, adopt containerization and robust CI/CD practices for flight software where appropriate, but ensure that software assurance methods are tailored to flight-criticality levels. Finally, pursue diversified sourcing and regional supplier engagement to mitigate exposure to tariff changes and geopolitical disruptions, while leveraging partnerships to accelerate time-to-flight for novel technologies. These steps collectively create a balanced approach that preserves technical ambition while managing programmatic risk.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework combining expert interviews, technical capability mapping, and policy review to produce validated insights into on-board computing program choices
The research synthesis underpinning this summary employed a mixed-methods approach combining primary technical interviews, systems-level design reviews, and secondary literature analysis. Primary inputs included structured interviews with mission architects, avionics engineers, supplier executives, and system integrators, which provided grounded insight into real-world trade-offs, qualification challenges, and procurement dynamics. These qualitative inputs were triangulated against white papers, standards documents, conference proceedings, and open-source technical reports to ensure that observed trends are supported by documented evidence.
In addition, a technology capability mapping exercise evaluated processor architectures, fault-tolerant techniques, and software frameworks to identify performance envelopes and integration considerations. The analysis also incorporated a review of public procurement frameworks and policy statements to understand how regulatory and tariff developments influence sourcing decisions. Throughout the process, findings were validated with subject matter experts to ensure technical accuracy and relevance to current program practices and near-term strategic choices.
A strategic synthesis that reinforces the imperative of modular architectures, rigorous qualification, and resilient sourcing to harness the promise of advanced on-board computing platforms
In conclusion, on-board computing platforms have evolved from discrete functional elements into strategic enablers that materially shape mission design, operations, and sustainment. Technology advances in heterogeneous processing, software modularity, and edge analytics are enabling more autonomous and data-efficient missions, while policy and supply chain dynamics require program teams to adopt more resilient procurement and design practices. The intersection of these forces creates both opportunity and complexity: opportunities to deliver novel capabilities and complexity in the form of qualification burdens and sourcing risk.
To capitalize on the opportunities, stakeholders should prioritize modular architectures, invest selectively in qualification for emerging processing technologies, and engage in strategic partnerships that accelerate maturation without compromising assurance. By aligning technical choices with procurement and policy realities, organizations can realize the benefits of modern computing platforms while maintaining the reliability and predictability that mission success demands.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative framing of how advances in on-board computing reshape spacecraft capability, program trade-offs, and mission-level decision making across modern space initiatives
Spaceborne on-board computing platforms are a foundational enabler of modern mission capability, powering everything from telemetry and telecommand to autonomous navigation and payload processing. Over the last decade, advances in processor design, software architectures, and miniaturization have shifted computing from a supporting role to a determinative element of mission architecture. As systems become more capable, they unlock new operational paradigms such as autonomous operations, in-orbit data reduction, and distributed mission architectures that alter how spacecraft are designed, integrated, and sustained.
This introduction frames on-board computing not merely as a component but as a platform-level design variable that influences launch mass, power budgets, thermal management, and lifecycle sustainment. Consequently, engineering teams must reconcile performance objectives with constraints imposed by radiation environments, latency requirements, and interoperability across constellations. By situating computing capability at the heart of mission trade studies, program leaders can better prioritize investments that deliver the greatest operational return.
Throughout this summary, technical drivers and commercial dynamics are examined with the objective of equipping decision-makers with a concise, actionable understanding of how computing choices cascade into systems-level consequences and strategic opportunities.
A comprehensive view of the multi-dimensional shifts transforming on-board computing hardware and software, altering operational norms and procurement priorities across space programs
The landscape for on-board computing is undergoing transformative shifts that span hardware, software, and operational doctrine. Hardware-wise, the industry is seeing a widening adoption of heterogeneous processing stacks that combine radiation-tolerant CPU cores, GPUs for parallel workloads, and specialized accelerators for AI inferencing. Meanwhile, software is moving toward containerized, modular flight stacks that separate payload processing from critical flight functions, enabling faster feature delivery and post-launch updates when validated by rigorous assurance processes.
Operationally, the rise of large low-Earth orbit constellations and proliferated low-cost missions has increased the premium on compute efficiency, autonomy, and interoperable communications. Edge processing is becoming a default design choice to reduce downlink dependency, while cloud-integrated testbeds allow ground teams to develop, validate, and iterate software closer to operational environments. In parallel, cybersecurity and supply chain resilience have emerged as non-functional imperatives that shape procurement specifications and contractor selection. These shifts collectively reframe computing platforms as dynamic assets that are iteratively improved during a mission lifecycle rather than static equipment that remains unchanged after launch.
An evidence-based examination of how evolving tariff policies are reshaping sourcing strategies, supplier footprints, and design modularity for resilient on-board computing programs
Recent tariff actions and trade policy changes have introduced new variables into procurement planning and supply chain architecture for space systems. Tariff adjustments on electronic components, specialized processors, and high-reliability parts can alter cost structures and incentivize greater localization or diversification of suppliers. As a consequence, engineering and sourcing teams are increasingly incorporating tariff sensitivity analyses into supplier selection, often favoring multi-sourcing strategies to mitigate exposure and preserve program schedules.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariffs influence supplier roadmaps and partner ecosystems. Semiconductor manufacturers and subsystem integrators may recalibrate production footprints and partnership agreements in response to trade barriers, which in turn affects lead times for radiation-hardened components and tested flight-grade assemblies. Program managers must therefore account for potential shifts in component availability and qualification timelines when developing integration schedules.
In response, mature programs are emphasizing design modularity and interface standardization so that functional replacements can be qualified with minimal rework. This approach reduces single-source dependency and allows teams to pivot suppliers without destabilizing software interfaces or thermal and power envelopes. Overall, trade policy dynamics are prompting a strategic refinement of sourcing frameworks and design practices to preserve resilience while maintaining technical performance.
A strategically structured segmentation analysis that clarifies system-level trade-offs across system types, end uses, processor classes, and architectural paradigms with practical implications for program design
Segmentation of the on-board computing domain reveals where technical investments and program priorities tend to cluster. Based on system type, the market is studied across Communication Systems, Flight Control Systems, Navigation Systems, Onboard Data Handling, and Power Management Systems, with Communication Systems further examined across Inter Satellite Links, Telecommand, and Telemetry while Navigation Systems are analyzed across GNSS, Inertial Measurement Units, and Star Trackers. These distinctions matter because the computational profiles for high-throughput telemetry differ markedly from those required by precision navigation or attitude control, leading to divergent hardware and software optimization strategies.
Based on end use, the market is studied across Launch Vehicles, Satellites, Space Stations, and Unmanned Rovers. Each end use imposes unique constraints: launch vehicles emphasize shock and transient tolerance, satellites balance power and thermal constraints for long-duration missions, space stations prioritize maintainability and upgradeability, and unmanned rovers demand rugged autonomy for surface operations. Based on processor type, the market is studied across Commercial Off The Shelf Processors and Radiation Hardened Processors, which highlights a central trade-off between performance-per-dollar and resilience in harsh radiation environments.
Based on architecture, the market is studied across Centralized Architecture and Distributed Architecture, with Centralized Architecture further dissected into Mainframe Based and Single Unit implementations and Distributed Architecture covering Cloud Integrated and Edge Processing approaches. Architectural choices influence how workloads are partitioned, how redundancy is implemented, and how software is validated, all of which have cascading implications for integration complexity, verification effort, and mission assurance.
A nuanced regional assessment revealing how geopolitical and industrial ecosystems in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific uniquely influence computing platform strategies and procurement behaviors
Regional dynamics shape technology adoption patterns, industrial ecosystems, and policy drivers that in turn influence platform design choices. In the Americas, a strong civil and commercial ecosystem supports rapid iteration of smallsat and constellation concepts, driven by accessible venture capital and an established base of aerospace primes and mission integrators. This environment fosters aggressive adoption of edge processing, software-defined payloads, and commercial off-the-shelf processing elements where assurance strategies permit.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of national programs, multinational consortia, and growing commercial activity. Emphasis in this region often centers on standards harmonization, cross-border partnerships, and sovereign capability development. These factors contribute to demand for architectures that prioritize interoperability, sustained in-orbit support, and compliance with national security procurement frameworks. In contrast, Asia-Pacific encompasses a rapidly expanding manufacturing base, increasing investments in indigenous semiconductor capability, and diverse mission profiles that range from lunar exploration to dense LEO constellations. Program leaders in this region emphasize scale, cost control, and integration of localized supply chains, which influences choices around processor sourcing, board-level design, and certification pathways.
Taken together, regional differences create an operational landscape where program priorities-whether rapid iteration, sovereign resilience, or manufacturing scale-drive distinct trajectories for on-board computing adoption and architectural preference.
Insight into how diverse industry players are aligning roadmaps, partnerships, and qualification strategies to deliver reliable and upgradeable on-board computing solutions for modern missions
Companies operating in the on-board computing ecosystem are adapting by aligning technology roadmaps with platform-level requirements and by forging partnerships that accelerate qualification pathways. Prime contractors and subsystem integrators are increasingly embedding software and services into hardware offers, seeking to capture greater lifecycle value through maintenance, updates, and mission analytics. At the same time, semiconductor suppliers and module makers are investing in radiation mitigation strategies and modular form factors that simplify integration for systems integrators and final assemblers.
Emerging firms and start-ups are carving niches by delivering specialized accelerators for AI workloads, compact avionics suites, and high-efficiency power management modules that reduce overall systems mass and power consumption. Meanwhile, established defense and aerospace suppliers are expanding their ecosystems to include commercial partners and cloud providers to support hybrid on-board/ground processing paradigms. Across the spectrum, companies prioritize demonstrable flight heritage, standards compliance, and a clear pathway to qualification, recognizing that long-term program adoption depends as much on proven reliability as on feature sets.
Strategic alliances, licensing arrangements, and testbed collaborations are therefore becoming the primary mechanisms through which firms de-risk technology maturation while accelerating customer adoption in a risk-averse procurement environment.
Actionable strategies for program leaders to embed modularity, qualification rigor, and supply chain diversification into on-board computing programs to reduce risk and accelerate capability delivery
Leaders should begin by embedding resilience and modularity into their platform architectures so that supplier substitutions and iterative software updates can be executed without destabilizing mission-critical interfaces. This requires disciplined interface definitions, standardized middleware, and a layered assurance strategy that separates critical flight functions from less critical payload processing. By doing so, programs reduce the cost and schedule risk associated with component obsolescence and supply chain shifts.
Second, invest in qualification pathways for heterogeneous processing elements and accelerators, including targeted test programs that validate performance under representative radiation and thermal regimes. Complementing this, adopt containerization and robust CI/CD practices for flight software where appropriate, but ensure that software assurance methods are tailored to flight-criticality levels. Finally, pursue diversified sourcing and regional supplier engagement to mitigate exposure to tariff changes and geopolitical disruptions, while leveraging partnerships to accelerate time-to-flight for novel technologies. These steps collectively create a balanced approach that preserves technical ambition while managing programmatic risk.
A rigorous mixed-methods research framework combining expert interviews, technical capability mapping, and policy review to produce validated insights into on-board computing program choices
The research synthesis underpinning this summary employed a mixed-methods approach combining primary technical interviews, systems-level design reviews, and secondary literature analysis. Primary inputs included structured interviews with mission architects, avionics engineers, supplier executives, and system integrators, which provided grounded insight into real-world trade-offs, qualification challenges, and procurement dynamics. These qualitative inputs were triangulated against white papers, standards documents, conference proceedings, and open-source technical reports to ensure that observed trends are supported by documented evidence.
In addition, a technology capability mapping exercise evaluated processor architectures, fault-tolerant techniques, and software frameworks to identify performance envelopes and integration considerations. The analysis also incorporated a review of public procurement frameworks and policy statements to understand how regulatory and tariff developments influence sourcing decisions. Throughout the process, findings were validated with subject matter experts to ensure technical accuracy and relevance to current program practices and near-term strategic choices.
A strategic synthesis that reinforces the imperative of modular architectures, rigorous qualification, and resilient sourcing to harness the promise of advanced on-board computing platforms
In conclusion, on-board computing platforms have evolved from discrete functional elements into strategic enablers that materially shape mission design, operations, and sustainment. Technology advances in heterogeneous processing, software modularity, and edge analytics are enabling more autonomous and data-efficient missions, while policy and supply chain dynamics require program teams to adopt more resilient procurement and design practices. The intersection of these forces creates both opportunity and complexity: opportunities to deliver novel capabilities and complexity in the form of qualification burdens and sourcing risk.
To capitalize on the opportunities, stakeholders should prioritize modular architectures, invest selectively in qualification for emerging processing technologies, and engage in strategic partnerships that accelerate maturation without compromising assurance. By aligning technical choices with procurement and policy realities, organizations can realize the benefits of modern computing platforms while maintaining the reliability and predictability that mission success demands.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Development of graphene-reinforced composite propellant tanks for reduced mass and enhanced durability
- 5.2. Implementation of advanced cryogenic insulation techniques to minimize boil-off losses during long-duration space missions
- 5.3. Adoption of 3D printed titanium alloy tanks enabling rapid on orbit manufacturing and reduced lead times
- 5.4. Integration of smart sensor networks for real-time propellant slosh control and precise tank health monitoring
- 5.5. Industry collaboration to establish refueling infrastructure and standardized docking interfaces in low Earth orbit
- 5.6. Research into nano-ceramic coatings preventing hydrogen permeation and microfracture in deep space storage environments
- 5.7. Regulatory evolution favoring reusable propulsion stages with modular tank designs for sustainable space logistics
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Carbon Fiber
- 8.2. Metallic Alloys
- 8.2.1. Aluminum Alloys
- 8.2.2. Steel Alloys
- 8.2.3. Titanium Alloys
- 9. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Insulation Type
- 9.1. Foam Insulation
- 9.2. Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI)
- 10. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Propellant Type
- 10.1. Bipropellant
- 10.2. Monopropellant
- 11. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Capacity
- 11.1. Large Tanks
- 11.2. Medium Tanks
- 11.3. Small Tanks
- 12. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Platform
- 12.1. Launch Vehicles
- 12.2. Satellite
- 13. Space Propellant Tank Market, by End-User
- 13.1. Commercial Space Agencies
- 13.2. Government & Military
- 14. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Space Propellant Tank Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Airbus S.A.S
- 17.3.2. ArianeGroup SAS
- 17.3.3. Blue Origin Enterprises, L.P
- 17.3.4. Busek Co. Inc.
- 17.3.5. Cobham Limited
- 17.3.6. Eaton Corporation plc
- 17.3.7. IHI AEROSPACE Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.8. Infinite Composites Technologies
- 17.3.9. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 17.3.10. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 17.3.11. Microcosm Inc.
- 17.3.12. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd
- 17.3.13. Moog Inc.
- 17.3.14. Nammo AS
- 17.3.15. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 17.3.16. OHB SE
- 17.3.17. Peak Technology GmbH
- 17.3.18. Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
- 17.3.19. The Boeing Company
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
