Soilless Growing Mediums Market by Medium (Inorganic, Organic), Cultivation Method (Aeroponics, Aquaponics, Hydroponics), Product Form, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Soil Monitoring Market was valued at USD 716.93 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 763.63 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.41%, reaching USD 1,270.12 million by 2032.
How converging sensor advances, resilient connectivity, and analytics integration are reshaping operational decision-making in soil monitoring worldwide
Soil monitoring has evolved from a niche research activity into a core capability for agriculture, environmental management, and commercial operations. Advances in sensor miniaturization, low-power wide-area networks, and cloud-native analytics have converged to create practical, deployable systems that deliver repeatable, high-frequency subsurface data. Practitioners today expect more than single-point measurements: they demand continuous, interoperable inputs that feed decision workflows spanning irrigation scheduling, fertilizer optimization, risk management, and regulatory compliance.
This introduction maps the technological, operational, and stakeholder vectors shaping uptake. On the technology axis, sensor diversity and connectivity options have broadened the toolkit available to implementers. Operationally, integration with farm management platforms and enterprise resource planning systems has reduced the friction of translating raw sensor readings into actions. At the stakeholder level, farmers, commercial operators, government agencies, and research institutions are increasingly aligning around shared data standards and performance metrics, creating opportunities for cross-sector collaboration. The net effect is a maturing ecosystem in which proven sensor modalities, resilient networks, and purpose-built analytics are combining to drive higher confidence in soil-informed decisions.
Emerging technological, connectivity, and service model shifts that are lowering barriers and creating scalable pathways for soil monitoring adoption
The landscape for soil monitoring is undergoing transformative shifts driven by both technological maturation and changing user expectations. Edge compute capabilities and energy-efficient sensors have reduced the operational cost and complexity of deployments, allowing sensor nodes to operate for extended periods without maintenance. Concurrently, software platforms are moving from bespoke integrations toward standardized APIs and modular architectures, enabling faster sensor onboarding and easier data fusion across sources.
Connectivity choices are shifting as well: low-power wide-area protocols are displacing some legacy wired deployments where mobility and wide coverage are priorities, while wired options persist in controlled, high-reliability installations. Data integrity and provenance have risen in importance, prompting investment in secure firmware practices and tamper-evident hardware design. Meanwhile, an expanding ecosystem of service providers now packages sensor hardware with analytics-as-a-service offerings, making turnkey solutions accessible to smaller operators who previously lacked the expertise to manage complex deployments. Taken together, these shifts are lowering barriers to entry and opening new commercial pathways for scalable, resilient soil monitoring implementations.
Strategic procurement responses and supply chain diversification prompted by evolving tariff dynamics and regulatory complexity affecting sensor and component sourcing
The tariff environment in and around the United States has added a new layer of strategic complexity for soil monitoring supply chains and procurement decisions. Changes in duty structures on electronic components, sensors, and finished assemblies have influenced sourcing choices by increasing landed costs for certain imported items and by incentivizing procurement managers to re-evaluate supplier geographies. In response, manufacturers and systems integrators have been assessing alternative sourcing strategies, including diversifying component suppliers, qualifying local assemblers, and redesigning bill-of-materials to reduce reliance on tariff-affected parts.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariff shifts have accelerated conversations about supply chain resilience and inventory strategies. Organizations pursuing long-term deployments increasingly favor multi-sourced components and modular designs that allow substitution without significant performance trade-offs. Regulatory compliance and customs classification have also become more central to supplier negotiations, with teams investing in tariff engineering, supplier audits, and contractual protections to mitigate exposure. These developments are encouraging a more strategic procurement posture across the ecosystem, where policy-driven cost volatility is managed through diversified supplier networks and design flexibility.
Detailed segmentation-driven understanding of product, sensor, connectivity, and end-user dynamics that inform targeted development and procurement strategies
A nuanced segmentation lens reveals differentiated adoption pathways and value propositions that cut across product, sensor, connectivity, and end-user dimensions. When viewed through product type, the landscape divides into hardware-focused sensors, value-added services encompassing installation and analytics, and software platforms that consolidate and visualize data; each of these categories attracts distinct buyer expectations and procurement cycles. Sensor type further frames technical differentiation: capacitive and dielectric sensors are commonly chosen for cost-effective volumetric water content sensing, optical approaches address spectral and complex property assessment needs, and tensiometric devices remain relevant where direct matric potential measurements are required.
Connectivity choices shape deployment architecture and costs. Wired and wireless strategies coexist, with wired solutions such as Ethernet and Usb favored in controlled environments and where power and deterministic latency are priorities, while wireless alternatives including Cellular, LoRaWAN, and NB-IoT enable dispersed, low-power, low-maintenance networks across large areas. End-user segmentation clarifies commercial demand drivers: Commercial operations and farmers prioritize return on investment and operational simplicity, government buyers emphasize regulatory compliance and data traceability, and research institutes focus on high-fidelity measurements and experimental flexibility. Integrating these segmentation perspectives supports targeted product development, differentiated service models, and bespoke procurement approaches that align technology capabilities with end-user objectives.
How regional policy, adoption patterns, and supply chain realities across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape deployment and procurement strategies
Regional dynamics vary substantially and influence deployment models, regulation, and partner ecosystems. In the Americas, agricultural innovation and large-scale commercial operations drive demand for robust, scalable sensor networks and integrated analytics, with a strong emphasis on private sector partnerships and precision-farming use cases. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous picture: established regulatory frameworks and sustainability mandates in parts of Europe encourage adoption for compliance and environmental monitoring, while emerging economies within the region may prioritize cost-effective, modular systems and donor-supported deployments.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by a rapid uptake of connected sensing across diverse geographies, from high-density peri-urban agriculture to expansive industrial plantations, supported by broad adoption of both cellular and low-power wide-area network technologies. Regional supply chains and local manufacturing capabilities also play a pivotal role in deployment strategies, with preference for locally supported suppliers in many jurisdictions. Across regions, interoperability, data governance, and climate adaptation priorities increasingly influence procurement, shaping how systems are specified, validated, and maintained over time.
Competitive and partnership dynamics among sensor manufacturers, integrators, and software platforms that determine adoption, interoperability, and long-term supplier viability
Competitive dynamics in the soil monitoring ecosystem are defined by a mix of specialized sensor manufacturers, systems integrators, cloud analytics providers, and services firms. Leading product suppliers differentiate through sensor performance characteristics, such as long-term stability, calibration simplicity, and environmental robustness, while service-oriented organizations compete on integration speed, lifecycle support, and outcome-based service models. Software providers that excel focus on open APIs, extensible data models, and analytics modules tuned to agronomic and environmental decision workflows, enabling customers to derive actionable insights without heavy engineering effort.
Partnership strategies are critical: hardware vendors that cultivate strong integrations with cloud and analytics partners typically achieve broader ecosystem traction, whereas software-first companies that validate sensor compatibility through certified hardware partners reduce onboarding friction for buyers. Meanwhile, a cohort of engineering-focused integrators and research institutions continues to push methodological improvements, contributing to reference datasets and validation protocols that elevate overall confidence in sensor-derived measurements. For procurement teams, supplier selection increasingly hinges on proven interoperability, clear support SLAs, and demonstrable outcomes in relevant deployment contexts.
Actionable strategic initiatives for leaders to increase resilience, interoperability, and outcome-driven adoption across diverse soil monitoring deployments
Industry leaders seeking to capture value and reduce risk should prioritize three strategic moves. First, design modular product architectures that allow substitution of sensor components and connectivity modules to manage tariff exposure and supply chain disruptions; modularity also accelerates field upgrades and reduces total cost of ownership. Second, invest in interoperability through standardized data schemas and open APIs so that hardware and software partners can be integrated with minimal engineering overhead, thereby shortening procurement cycles and increasing customer stickiness.
Third, develop outcome-focused service offerings that align technical performance with operational KPIs such as water-use efficiency, yield stability, and compliance readiness. These services should be supported by clear onboarding processes, training resources, and evidence from field pilots that articulate expected benefits. In parallel, establishing transparent procurement and compliance practices, including supplier audits and tariff sensitivity analyses, will strengthen resilience. Executed together, these moves position leaders to capture cross-segment demand while minimizing exposure to policy and supply chain volatility.
A pragmatic, rigor-focused research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and policy analysis to ensure actionable and reproducible findings
The research methodology underpinning this executive synthesis combined multi-source technical appraisal, stakeholder interviews, and deployment validation to ensure robust insights. Primary qualitative inputs were gathered from technology vendors, system integrators, end users across commercial and public sectors, and research institutions to contextualize capability trade-offs and procurement priorities. Technical evaluations included laboratory calibration studies and field deployment observations to assess sensor stability, connectivity performance, and data integrity under representative conditions.
Secondary analysis drew on policy documents, standards guidance, and peer-reviewed literature to situate technological trends within regulatory and environmental contexts. Cross-validation steps included triangulating interview themes with deployment evidence and aligning supplier claims with observed performance data. Emphasis was placed on reproducibility and transparency: methods, sampling criteria, and validation checkpoints were documented to allow readers to assess the applicability of findings to their specific operational settings. The approach prioritized practical relevance and technical rigor to support decision-making across commercial, governmental, and research use cases.
Concluding synthesis on scalability, stakeholder alignment, and the operational priorities that will drive sustained adoption of soil monitoring solutions
In conclusion, soil monitoring is entering a phase of pragmatic expansion in which proven technologies, flexible connectivity, and service-oriented business models converge to enable measurable operational gains. Stakeholders across commercial agriculture, public agencies, and research institutions are aligning on shared priorities: data quality, interoperability, and lifecycle support. These shared priorities create fertile ground for vendors and integrators to craft differentiated offerings that address real-world constraints such as power availability, maintenance burden, and regulatory compliance.
Sustained progress will depend on continued attention to sensor reliability, clear data governance practices, and procurement approaches that emphasize modularity and supplier diversification. As adopters demand turnkey solutions with transparent outcomes, organizations that invest in validated integrations, predictable support, and outcome-focused services will be best positioned to scale. The path forward emphasizes collaboration across the ecosystem-hardware makers, software vendors, service providers, and end users-so that soil monitoring can move from pilot projects to sustained operational deployments that deliver verifiable value.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
How converging sensor advances, resilient connectivity, and analytics integration are reshaping operational decision-making in soil monitoring worldwide
Soil monitoring has evolved from a niche research activity into a core capability for agriculture, environmental management, and commercial operations. Advances in sensor miniaturization, low-power wide-area networks, and cloud-native analytics have converged to create practical, deployable systems that deliver repeatable, high-frequency subsurface data. Practitioners today expect more than single-point measurements: they demand continuous, interoperable inputs that feed decision workflows spanning irrigation scheduling, fertilizer optimization, risk management, and regulatory compliance.
This introduction maps the technological, operational, and stakeholder vectors shaping uptake. On the technology axis, sensor diversity and connectivity options have broadened the toolkit available to implementers. Operationally, integration with farm management platforms and enterprise resource planning systems has reduced the friction of translating raw sensor readings into actions. At the stakeholder level, farmers, commercial operators, government agencies, and research institutions are increasingly aligning around shared data standards and performance metrics, creating opportunities for cross-sector collaboration. The net effect is a maturing ecosystem in which proven sensor modalities, resilient networks, and purpose-built analytics are combining to drive higher confidence in soil-informed decisions.
Emerging technological, connectivity, and service model shifts that are lowering barriers and creating scalable pathways for soil monitoring adoption
The landscape for soil monitoring is undergoing transformative shifts driven by both technological maturation and changing user expectations. Edge compute capabilities and energy-efficient sensors have reduced the operational cost and complexity of deployments, allowing sensor nodes to operate for extended periods without maintenance. Concurrently, software platforms are moving from bespoke integrations toward standardized APIs and modular architectures, enabling faster sensor onboarding and easier data fusion across sources.
Connectivity choices are shifting as well: low-power wide-area protocols are displacing some legacy wired deployments where mobility and wide coverage are priorities, while wired options persist in controlled, high-reliability installations. Data integrity and provenance have risen in importance, prompting investment in secure firmware practices and tamper-evident hardware design. Meanwhile, an expanding ecosystem of service providers now packages sensor hardware with analytics-as-a-service offerings, making turnkey solutions accessible to smaller operators who previously lacked the expertise to manage complex deployments. Taken together, these shifts are lowering barriers to entry and opening new commercial pathways for scalable, resilient soil monitoring implementations.
Strategic procurement responses and supply chain diversification prompted by evolving tariff dynamics and regulatory complexity affecting sensor and component sourcing
The tariff environment in and around the United States has added a new layer of strategic complexity for soil monitoring supply chains and procurement decisions. Changes in duty structures on electronic components, sensors, and finished assemblies have influenced sourcing choices by increasing landed costs for certain imported items and by incentivizing procurement managers to re-evaluate supplier geographies. In response, manufacturers and systems integrators have been assessing alternative sourcing strategies, including diversifying component suppliers, qualifying local assemblers, and redesigning bill-of-materials to reduce reliance on tariff-affected parts.
Beyond direct cost impacts, tariff shifts have accelerated conversations about supply chain resilience and inventory strategies. Organizations pursuing long-term deployments increasingly favor multi-sourced components and modular designs that allow substitution without significant performance trade-offs. Regulatory compliance and customs classification have also become more central to supplier negotiations, with teams investing in tariff engineering, supplier audits, and contractual protections to mitigate exposure. These developments are encouraging a more strategic procurement posture across the ecosystem, where policy-driven cost volatility is managed through diversified supplier networks and design flexibility.
Detailed segmentation-driven understanding of product, sensor, connectivity, and end-user dynamics that inform targeted development and procurement strategies
A nuanced segmentation lens reveals differentiated adoption pathways and value propositions that cut across product, sensor, connectivity, and end-user dimensions. When viewed through product type, the landscape divides into hardware-focused sensors, value-added services encompassing installation and analytics, and software platforms that consolidate and visualize data; each of these categories attracts distinct buyer expectations and procurement cycles. Sensor type further frames technical differentiation: capacitive and dielectric sensors are commonly chosen for cost-effective volumetric water content sensing, optical approaches address spectral and complex property assessment needs, and tensiometric devices remain relevant where direct matric potential measurements are required.
Connectivity choices shape deployment architecture and costs. Wired and wireless strategies coexist, with wired solutions such as Ethernet and Usb favored in controlled environments and where power and deterministic latency are priorities, while wireless alternatives including Cellular, LoRaWAN, and NB-IoT enable dispersed, low-power, low-maintenance networks across large areas. End-user segmentation clarifies commercial demand drivers: Commercial operations and farmers prioritize return on investment and operational simplicity, government buyers emphasize regulatory compliance and data traceability, and research institutes focus on high-fidelity measurements and experimental flexibility. Integrating these segmentation perspectives supports targeted product development, differentiated service models, and bespoke procurement approaches that align technology capabilities with end-user objectives.
How regional policy, adoption patterns, and supply chain realities across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape deployment and procurement strategies
Regional dynamics vary substantially and influence deployment models, regulation, and partner ecosystems. In the Americas, agricultural innovation and large-scale commercial operations drive demand for robust, scalable sensor networks and integrated analytics, with a strong emphasis on private sector partnerships and precision-farming use cases. Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous picture: established regulatory frameworks and sustainability mandates in parts of Europe encourage adoption for compliance and environmental monitoring, while emerging economies within the region may prioritize cost-effective, modular systems and donor-supported deployments.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by a rapid uptake of connected sensing across diverse geographies, from high-density peri-urban agriculture to expansive industrial plantations, supported by broad adoption of both cellular and low-power wide-area network technologies. Regional supply chains and local manufacturing capabilities also play a pivotal role in deployment strategies, with preference for locally supported suppliers in many jurisdictions. Across regions, interoperability, data governance, and climate adaptation priorities increasingly influence procurement, shaping how systems are specified, validated, and maintained over time.
Competitive and partnership dynamics among sensor manufacturers, integrators, and software platforms that determine adoption, interoperability, and long-term supplier viability
Competitive dynamics in the soil monitoring ecosystem are defined by a mix of specialized sensor manufacturers, systems integrators, cloud analytics providers, and services firms. Leading product suppliers differentiate through sensor performance characteristics, such as long-term stability, calibration simplicity, and environmental robustness, while service-oriented organizations compete on integration speed, lifecycle support, and outcome-based service models. Software providers that excel focus on open APIs, extensible data models, and analytics modules tuned to agronomic and environmental decision workflows, enabling customers to derive actionable insights without heavy engineering effort.
Partnership strategies are critical: hardware vendors that cultivate strong integrations with cloud and analytics partners typically achieve broader ecosystem traction, whereas software-first companies that validate sensor compatibility through certified hardware partners reduce onboarding friction for buyers. Meanwhile, a cohort of engineering-focused integrators and research institutions continues to push methodological improvements, contributing to reference datasets and validation protocols that elevate overall confidence in sensor-derived measurements. For procurement teams, supplier selection increasingly hinges on proven interoperability, clear support SLAs, and demonstrable outcomes in relevant deployment contexts.
Actionable strategic initiatives for leaders to increase resilience, interoperability, and outcome-driven adoption across diverse soil monitoring deployments
Industry leaders seeking to capture value and reduce risk should prioritize three strategic moves. First, design modular product architectures that allow substitution of sensor components and connectivity modules to manage tariff exposure and supply chain disruptions; modularity also accelerates field upgrades and reduces total cost of ownership. Second, invest in interoperability through standardized data schemas and open APIs so that hardware and software partners can be integrated with minimal engineering overhead, thereby shortening procurement cycles and increasing customer stickiness.
Third, develop outcome-focused service offerings that align technical performance with operational KPIs such as water-use efficiency, yield stability, and compliance readiness. These services should be supported by clear onboarding processes, training resources, and evidence from field pilots that articulate expected benefits. In parallel, establishing transparent procurement and compliance practices, including supplier audits and tariff sensitivity analyses, will strengthen resilience. Executed together, these moves position leaders to capture cross-segment demand while minimizing exposure to policy and supply chain volatility.
A pragmatic, rigor-focused research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and policy analysis to ensure actionable and reproducible findings
The research methodology underpinning this executive synthesis combined multi-source technical appraisal, stakeholder interviews, and deployment validation to ensure robust insights. Primary qualitative inputs were gathered from technology vendors, system integrators, end users across commercial and public sectors, and research institutions to contextualize capability trade-offs and procurement priorities. Technical evaluations included laboratory calibration studies and field deployment observations to assess sensor stability, connectivity performance, and data integrity under representative conditions.
Secondary analysis drew on policy documents, standards guidance, and peer-reviewed literature to situate technological trends within regulatory and environmental contexts. Cross-validation steps included triangulating interview themes with deployment evidence and aligning supplier claims with observed performance data. Emphasis was placed on reproducibility and transparency: methods, sampling criteria, and validation checkpoints were documented to allow readers to assess the applicability of findings to their specific operational settings. The approach prioritized practical relevance and technical rigor to support decision-making across commercial, governmental, and research use cases.
Concluding synthesis on scalability, stakeholder alignment, and the operational priorities that will drive sustained adoption of soil monitoring solutions
In conclusion, soil monitoring is entering a phase of pragmatic expansion in which proven technologies, flexible connectivity, and service-oriented business models converge to enable measurable operational gains. Stakeholders across commercial agriculture, public agencies, and research institutions are aligning on shared priorities: data quality, interoperability, and lifecycle support. These shared priorities create fertile ground for vendors and integrators to craft differentiated offerings that address real-world constraints such as power availability, maintenance burden, and regulatory compliance.
Sustained progress will depend on continued attention to sensor reliability, clear data governance practices, and procurement approaches that emphasize modularity and supplier diversification. As adopters demand turnkey solutions with transparent outcomes, organizations that invest in validated integrations, predictable support, and outcome-focused services will be best positioned to scale. The path forward emphasizes collaboration across the ecosystem-hardware makers, software vendors, service providers, and end users-so that soil monitoring can move from pilot projects to sustained operational deployments that deliver verifiable value.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of advanced hydroponic irrigation automation for optimized nutrient delivery
- 5.2. Adoption of biodegradable coco coir blends enhanced with mycorrhizal fungi and biochar amendments
- 5.3. Expansion of vertical farm systems utilizing aeroponic misters in urban microclimate-controlled facilities
- 5.4. Development of smart sensor-based soilless substrates enabling real-time pH and EC adjustments
- 5.5. Surge in research on sustainable algae-infused hydrogel mediums for improved water retention
- 5.6. Collaboration between agricultural biotech firms to engineer microbial consortia for coco peat substrates
- 5.7. Scaling of closed-loop recirculating systems to reduce water waste and nutrient runoff in commercial greenhouses
- 5.8. Emergence of tailored soilless blends formulated for cannabinoid crop optimization and yield consistency
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Medium
- 8.1. Inorganic
- 8.1.1. Coco Coir
- 8.1.2. Expanded Polystyrene (EPS)
- 8.1.3. Hydroton
- 8.1.4. Perlite
- 8.1.5. Rockwool
- 8.1.6. Vermiculite
- 8.2. Organic
- 8.2.1. Compost
- 8.2.2. Forest Products
- 8.2.3. Hemp Fiber
- 8.2.4. Peat Moss
- 8.2.5. Rice Hulls
- 8.2.6. Worm Castings
- 9. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Cultivation Method
- 9.1. Aeroponics
- 9.2. Aquaponics
- 9.3. Hydroponics
- 10. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Product Form
- 10.1. Blocks/Slabs/Cubes
- 10.2. Grow Bags
- 10.3. Loose Media/Bulk Form
- 10.4. Pellets/Plugs
- 11. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Application
- 11.1. Flowers & Ornamentals
- 11.1.1. Roses
- 11.1.2. Tulips
- 11.2. Fruits & Vegetables
- 11.2.1. Cucumbers
- 11.2.2. Leafy Greens
- 11.2.2.1. Kale
- 11.2.2.2. Lettuce
- 11.2.2.3. Spinach
- 11.2.3. Peppers
- 11.2.4. Tomatoes
- 11.3. Herbs
- 11.3.1. Basil
- 11.3.2. Mint
- 11.4. Medicinal Plants
- 12. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by End User
- 12.1. Commercial
- 12.2. Residential
- 13. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Soilless Growing Mediums Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. AeroFarms, LLC
- 16.3.2. AmHydro
- 16.3.3. Brio Hydroponics
- 16.3.4. Carolina Perlite Co., Inc.
- 16.3.5. CoCoir
- 16.3.6. FoxFarm Soil & Fertilizer Co.
- 16.3.7. GrowLife, Inc.
- 16.3.8. Hawthorne Gardening Company
- 16.3.9. Hydrodynamics International, Inc.
- 16.3.10. Hydrofarm
- 16.3.11. Lambert Peat Moss Inc.
- 16.3.12. Les Tourbières Berger Ltée
- 16.3.13. Pegasus Agritech
- 16.3.14. Pelemix Ltd. by SunGro Horticulture
- 16.3.15. Pennsylvania Perlite Corporation
- 16.3.16. PF Harris Manufacturing Co. LLC
- 16.3.17. PittMoss, LLC
- 16.3.18. Plantonix
- 16.3.19. Premier Tech Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Quick Plug by Profile Products
- 16.3.21. Rise Hydroponics
- 16.3.22. Sri Ragavendra Coir Factory
- 16.3.23. Supreme Perlite
- 16.3.24. Thanet Earth Limited
- 16.3.25. Just Hydroponics
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
