Soil Fumigant Market by Chemical Type (1,3-Dichloropropene, Chloropicrin, Methyl Bromide), Crop Type (Field Crops, Fruits & Nuts, Ornamentals), Application Method, Form - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Soil Fumigant Market was valued at USD 1.39 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.47 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.82%, reaching USD 2.19 billion by 2032.
An authoritative orientation to the evolving technical, regulatory, and stewardship forces reshaping soil fumigant use and strategic decision making across crop systems
Soil fumigants remain a pivotal component of integrated crop protection strategies, addressing soilborne pathogens, nematodes, and weed pressure in intensive production systems. Historically, fumigants have enabled high-value cropping systems to achieve predictable yields and quality standards, but contemporary pressures-from evolving regulatory scrutiny to environmental stewardship imperatives-have accelerated change across the value chain.
Recent years have seen a recalibration of product portfolios, application protocols, and stewardship programs as growers, advisors, and formulators seek to balance efficacy with worker safety and environmental protection. As a result, the technical conversation now emphasizes precise delivery, reduced off-target movement, and compatibility with conservation practices. In parallel, formulation science and application hardware have matured to support more targeted treatments and to reduce emissions through engineering controls and site-specific decision rules.
Consequently, participants across the supply chain must navigate an increasingly complex interplay of chemistry, agronomy, and regulation. This introduction frames the subsequent sections, which examine transformative landscape shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation dynamics, regional differentiators, competitive behavior, and recommended actions for industry leaders who must adapt strategies to preserve crop performance while meeting contemporary sustainability and compliance expectations.
How regulatory tightening, precision application technologies, and integrated pest management adoption are collectively transforming fumigant practice and industry priorities
The soil fumigant landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by regulatory tightening, agronomic innovation, and shifting stakeholder expectations. Regulatory agencies have intensified focus on worker safety and environmental exposure, prompting manufacturers to reformulate products and to invest in engineering controls that reduce emissions and human contact. At the same time, growers increasingly adopt integrated pest management practices that combine biological controls, resistant cultivars, and targeted chemical inputs, which changes demand patterns and use cycles.
Technological advances in application systems, such as improved shank injection mechanics, precision soil gas management, and drip-based delivery technologies, are enabling more efficient active ingredient placement and reduced off-site movement. Analytical advances and on-farm diagnostics are facilitating earlier pathogen detection and more strategic application timing, creating opportunities to lower overall reliance on broad-spectrum fumigation. Additionally, the emergence of alternative chemistries and MITC generator formulations has prompted formulators to prioritize lower-emission profiles and improved worker safety across product development pipelines.
Taken together, these dynamics are reshaping product lifecycles, investment priorities, and extension approaches. Firms that integrate compliance-driven innovation, precision application capability, and agronomic advisory into go-to-market strategies will be better positioned to meet both grower performance needs and the rising expectations of regulators and supply chain partners.
The aggregated consequences of 2025 tariff measures on supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and regulatory alignment in the soil fumigant value chain
The introduction of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 has exerted a cumulative influence on supply chains, procurement decisions, and operational planning across the soil fumigant ecosystem. Tariffs that affect precursor chemicals, packaging materials, and finished formulations have prompted purchasers to reassess supplier diversity, contract terms, and inventory policies. In many cases, organizations responded by increasing lead times, qualifying alternative suppliers, and accelerating local sourcing where feasible to mitigate exposure to cross-border cost volatility.
Trade measures have had downstream effects on pricing dynamics, which in turn affected procurement cadence and grower purchasing behavior. For formulators dependent on imported active ingredients, the tariffs incentivized closer collaboration with upstream suppliers to optimize logistics and to explore co-manufacturing or tolling arrangements. At the same time, some downstream stakeholders shifted toward higher-efficiency application approaches to control operational spending and to reduce per-hectare input needs.
Furthermore, tariffs prompted renewed attention to regulatory harmonization and compliance complexity when importing formulations or active substances subject to differing registration regimes. In response, firms expanded regulatory affairs capabilities and invested in localized registration strategies. Ultimately, the 2025 tariff environment underscored the need for greater supply-chain resilience, contractual flexibility, and scenario planning to preserve continuity of service and to support growers through potential cost adjustments.
Strategic segmentation analysis revealing how chemical types, crop categories, application methods, and formulation forms interact to shape product positioning and stewardship needs
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential to align R&D, product development, and commercial strategies with end-user needs. Examining chemical type distinctions reveals differentiated performance attributes and regulatory footprints among 1,3-Dichloropropene, Chloropicrin, Methyl Bromide, and MITC Generators, with the latter category further differentiated into Dazomet, Metam Potassium, and Metam Sodium, each presenting unique volatilization profiles and handling requirements. These chemical differences influence preferred application methods and stewardship protocols.
Crop type considerations produce distinct application imperatives. Field Crops typically prioritize cost-efficiency and large-area application tactics, while Fruits & Nuts demand precision and residue management to protect harvest quality, with specific considerations for Berries and Tree Nuts due to their sensitivity and market value. Ornamentals require flexible application windows and often benefit from localized delivery systems, whereas Vegetables impose tighter tolerances and timing constraints, particularly across Fruit Vegetables, Leafy Vegetables, and Root Vegetables where crop physiology and market tolerance differ markedly.
Application method segmentation-shank injection, soil drip, and soil gas delivery-creates operational trade-offs between depth of placement, emission control, and labor intensity. Form distinctions between gaseous and liquid presentations further affect handling, storage, and equipment compatibility. Strategic choices at the intersection of these dimensions determine product positioning, stewardship requirements, and the kinds of technical support growers need to achieve consistent, safe outcomes.
A comparative regional assessment highlighting how regulatory regimes, production systems, and adoption patterns in major geographies drive differentiated product strategies and supply chain choices
Regional dynamics materially influence regulatory trajectories, adoption rates, and supply chain strategies across the global soil fumigant landscape. In the Americas, established agricultural regions combine intensive specialty crop production with growing emphasis on emissions reduction practices and stringent worker protection measures, which drives demand for precision application tools and stewardship training. North and South American regulatory frameworks vary, requiring tailored registration approaches and localized extension services to support growers.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory constraints and public scrutiny often create a high bar for approval and use patterns, prompting formulators to prioritize low-emission formulations and to invest in extensive registration dossiers and monitoring programs. Adoption in this geography tends to favor technologies and application methods that demonstrably reduce off-target movement and align with cross-border environmental commitments.
Asia-Pacific presents a diversity of production systems and regulatory environments, from highly mechanized commercial operations to smallholder contexts, which influences both product design and distribution strategies. In some Asia-Pacific markets, rapid adoption of drip-based delivery and localized manufacturing supports cost-effective deployment, whereas other locations emphasize strict residue management and worker protection. Across all regions, supply chain continuity, regulatory compliance, and the ability to deliver agronomic support remain decisive factors for commercial success.
How strategic partnerships, formulation innovation, and integrated service offerings are reshaping competitive advantage and long-term commercial positioning in soil fumigants
Competitive behavior within the industry reflects a balance between scale-based capabilities and specialized innovation. Large agricultural chemical firms and global specialty formulators continue to leverage broad registrational footprints, logistical networks, and R&D resources to maintain product continuity and to advance engineering controls that reduce emissions. Meanwhile, nimble technology providers and smaller formulators focus on niche opportunities, such as low-emission MITC generator formulations, enhanced worker-protection packaging, and compatibility with precision application equipment.
Partnerships and licensing arrangements have become common mechanisms to accelerate market entry and to share regulatory burdens, particularly where local registrations or toll-manufacturing agreements are required. Firms are also investing in training and stewardship programs to strengthen on-farm adoption and to reduce compliance risk. Across the value chain, suppliers are prioritizing backward integration of critical precursors and forward integration of application services to capture value from end-to-end offerings.
Intellectual property strategies center on formulation improvements, emission-reduction technologies, and delivery hardware, while corporate sustainability commitments increasingly shape product roadmaps. For decision-makers, monitoring competitor activities in formulation science, application technology partnerships, and supply-chain reconfiguration provides early signals of shifting industry dynamics and potential collaboration opportunities.
Actionable strategic steps for firms to strengthen resilience, comply with evolving regulations, and adopt precision delivery technologies to protect crop performance and reputation
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic, actionable measures to navigate regulatory complexity, strengthen supply-chain resilience, and meet grower performance expectations. First, diversify procurement channels and qualify multiple suppliers for critical precursors and packaging to reduce exposure to trade disruptions and tariff-driven cost variability. Complement supplier diversification with strategic inventory planning and contractual flexibility to allow rapid adjustments to changing logistics conditions.
Second, accelerate investment in precision application technologies and emissions-control engineering to improve efficacy while meeting tightening environmental and worker-safety requirements. Integrating advanced shank injection systems, soil drip solutions, and soil gas monitoring will improve placement accuracy and reduce off-target movement. These investments should be paired with intensive training programs for applicators and growers to ensure correct execution and to maximize return on technology investments.
Third, strengthen regulatory affairs and stewardship capabilities by building proactive registration roadmaps, expanding residue monitoring, and engaging with policymakers and extension services. Finally, pursue targeted collaborations across the value chain-including co-development with specialty formulators and service providers-to bring to market formulation and delivery innovations that balance efficacy, safety, and sustainability. Implementing these steps will help organizations preserve operational continuity and align product offerings with evolving stakeholder expectations.
A transparent, triangulated research approach using primary stakeholder interviews and targeted secondary validation to deliver defensible and operationally focused conclusions
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined primary engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary-source synthesis to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary research consisted of structured interviews with growers, crop consultants, formulation scientists, application-equipment manufacturers, and regulatory specialists to capture firsthand perspectives on efficacy, handling practices, and adoption barriers. Interviews were designed to surface operational constraints, stewardship practices, and technology adoption drivers across multiple crop systems.
Secondary research included a systematic review of regulatory documentation, peer-reviewed agronomic studies, patent filings related to formulation and application technologies, and trade data that illuminate supply-chain flows and logistical chokepoints. Where applicable, site-level case studies were employed to validate the practical performance of application methods such as shank injection, soil drip, and soil gas approaches, and to compare gaseous versus liquid formulation handling requirements.
Data synthesis combined qualitative insights with cross-validation across independent sources to reduce bias and to highlight recurring themes. Limitations include variability in regional reporting granularity and the evolving regulatory environment, which can change product authorization and labeling. To mitigate these constraints, the methodology emphasized triangulation and sought corroboration from multiple stakeholder types to produce a defensible and operationally relevant analysis.
A concise synthesis emphasizing coordinated innovation, stewardship, and regional adaptation as the pathway to sustainable soil fumigant usage and resilient supply chains
In conclusion, soil fumigant stewardship and commercial strategy are at an inflection point where regulatory demands, technological capability, and stakeholder expectations intersect. Achieving high agronomic performance while addressing safety and environmental concerns requires coordinated investment in formulation science, application engineering, and on-farm advisory systems. The most resilient organizations will combine supplier diversification, precision delivery adoption, and proactive regulatory engagement to manage operational risk and to support growers effectively.
Emerging alternatives and refinements to existing chemistries underscore the opportunity for product differentiation through emission reduction, safer handling, and integration with integrated pest management frameworks. Meanwhile, regional variation in regulatory and production systems necessitates localized commercialization plans and tailored extension efforts. By aligning commercial strategies with technological innovation and robust stewardship, industry participants can sustain crop protection outcomes while adapting to evolving societal and regulatory expectations.
Ultimately, the path forward is collaborative: manufacturers, applicators, advisors, and regulators must work together to advance safe, effective, and sustainable soil health practices that preserve productivity and market access for growers across diverse cropping systems.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative orientation to the evolving technical, regulatory, and stewardship forces reshaping soil fumigant use and strategic decision making across crop systems
Soil fumigants remain a pivotal component of integrated crop protection strategies, addressing soilborne pathogens, nematodes, and weed pressure in intensive production systems. Historically, fumigants have enabled high-value cropping systems to achieve predictable yields and quality standards, but contemporary pressures-from evolving regulatory scrutiny to environmental stewardship imperatives-have accelerated change across the value chain.
Recent years have seen a recalibration of product portfolios, application protocols, and stewardship programs as growers, advisors, and formulators seek to balance efficacy with worker safety and environmental protection. As a result, the technical conversation now emphasizes precise delivery, reduced off-target movement, and compatibility with conservation practices. In parallel, formulation science and application hardware have matured to support more targeted treatments and to reduce emissions through engineering controls and site-specific decision rules.
Consequently, participants across the supply chain must navigate an increasingly complex interplay of chemistry, agronomy, and regulation. This introduction frames the subsequent sections, which examine transformative landscape shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation dynamics, regional differentiators, competitive behavior, and recommended actions for industry leaders who must adapt strategies to preserve crop performance while meeting contemporary sustainability and compliance expectations.
How regulatory tightening, precision application technologies, and integrated pest management adoption are collectively transforming fumigant practice and industry priorities
The soil fumigant landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by regulatory tightening, agronomic innovation, and shifting stakeholder expectations. Regulatory agencies have intensified focus on worker safety and environmental exposure, prompting manufacturers to reformulate products and to invest in engineering controls that reduce emissions and human contact. At the same time, growers increasingly adopt integrated pest management practices that combine biological controls, resistant cultivars, and targeted chemical inputs, which changes demand patterns and use cycles.
Technological advances in application systems, such as improved shank injection mechanics, precision soil gas management, and drip-based delivery technologies, are enabling more efficient active ingredient placement and reduced off-site movement. Analytical advances and on-farm diagnostics are facilitating earlier pathogen detection and more strategic application timing, creating opportunities to lower overall reliance on broad-spectrum fumigation. Additionally, the emergence of alternative chemistries and MITC generator formulations has prompted formulators to prioritize lower-emission profiles and improved worker safety across product development pipelines.
Taken together, these dynamics are reshaping product lifecycles, investment priorities, and extension approaches. Firms that integrate compliance-driven innovation, precision application capability, and agronomic advisory into go-to-market strategies will be better positioned to meet both grower performance needs and the rising expectations of regulators and supply chain partners.
The aggregated consequences of 2025 tariff measures on supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and regulatory alignment in the soil fumigant value chain
The introduction of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 has exerted a cumulative influence on supply chains, procurement decisions, and operational planning across the soil fumigant ecosystem. Tariffs that affect precursor chemicals, packaging materials, and finished formulations have prompted purchasers to reassess supplier diversity, contract terms, and inventory policies. In many cases, organizations responded by increasing lead times, qualifying alternative suppliers, and accelerating local sourcing where feasible to mitigate exposure to cross-border cost volatility.
Trade measures have had downstream effects on pricing dynamics, which in turn affected procurement cadence and grower purchasing behavior. For formulators dependent on imported active ingredients, the tariffs incentivized closer collaboration with upstream suppliers to optimize logistics and to explore co-manufacturing or tolling arrangements. At the same time, some downstream stakeholders shifted toward higher-efficiency application approaches to control operational spending and to reduce per-hectare input needs.
Furthermore, tariffs prompted renewed attention to regulatory harmonization and compliance complexity when importing formulations or active substances subject to differing registration regimes. In response, firms expanded regulatory affairs capabilities and invested in localized registration strategies. Ultimately, the 2025 tariff environment underscored the need for greater supply-chain resilience, contractual flexibility, and scenario planning to preserve continuity of service and to support growers through potential cost adjustments.
Strategic segmentation analysis revealing how chemical types, crop categories, application methods, and formulation forms interact to shape product positioning and stewardship needs
A nuanced understanding of segmentation is essential to align R&D, product development, and commercial strategies with end-user needs. Examining chemical type distinctions reveals differentiated performance attributes and regulatory footprints among 1,3-Dichloropropene, Chloropicrin, Methyl Bromide, and MITC Generators, with the latter category further differentiated into Dazomet, Metam Potassium, and Metam Sodium, each presenting unique volatilization profiles and handling requirements. These chemical differences influence preferred application methods and stewardship protocols.
Crop type considerations produce distinct application imperatives. Field Crops typically prioritize cost-efficiency and large-area application tactics, while Fruits & Nuts demand precision and residue management to protect harvest quality, with specific considerations for Berries and Tree Nuts due to their sensitivity and market value. Ornamentals require flexible application windows and often benefit from localized delivery systems, whereas Vegetables impose tighter tolerances and timing constraints, particularly across Fruit Vegetables, Leafy Vegetables, and Root Vegetables where crop physiology and market tolerance differ markedly.
Application method segmentation-shank injection, soil drip, and soil gas delivery-creates operational trade-offs between depth of placement, emission control, and labor intensity. Form distinctions between gaseous and liquid presentations further affect handling, storage, and equipment compatibility. Strategic choices at the intersection of these dimensions determine product positioning, stewardship requirements, and the kinds of technical support growers need to achieve consistent, safe outcomes.
A comparative regional assessment highlighting how regulatory regimes, production systems, and adoption patterns in major geographies drive differentiated product strategies and supply chain choices
Regional dynamics materially influence regulatory trajectories, adoption rates, and supply chain strategies across the global soil fumigant landscape. In the Americas, established agricultural regions combine intensive specialty crop production with growing emphasis on emissions reduction practices and stringent worker protection measures, which drives demand for precision application tools and stewardship training. North and South American regulatory frameworks vary, requiring tailored registration approaches and localized extension services to support growers.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory constraints and public scrutiny often create a high bar for approval and use patterns, prompting formulators to prioritize low-emission formulations and to invest in extensive registration dossiers and monitoring programs. Adoption in this geography tends to favor technologies and application methods that demonstrably reduce off-target movement and align with cross-border environmental commitments.
Asia-Pacific presents a diversity of production systems and regulatory environments, from highly mechanized commercial operations to smallholder contexts, which influences both product design and distribution strategies. In some Asia-Pacific markets, rapid adoption of drip-based delivery and localized manufacturing supports cost-effective deployment, whereas other locations emphasize strict residue management and worker protection. Across all regions, supply chain continuity, regulatory compliance, and the ability to deliver agronomic support remain decisive factors for commercial success.
How strategic partnerships, formulation innovation, and integrated service offerings are reshaping competitive advantage and long-term commercial positioning in soil fumigants
Competitive behavior within the industry reflects a balance between scale-based capabilities and specialized innovation. Large agricultural chemical firms and global specialty formulators continue to leverage broad registrational footprints, logistical networks, and R&D resources to maintain product continuity and to advance engineering controls that reduce emissions. Meanwhile, nimble technology providers and smaller formulators focus on niche opportunities, such as low-emission MITC generator formulations, enhanced worker-protection packaging, and compatibility with precision application equipment.
Partnerships and licensing arrangements have become common mechanisms to accelerate market entry and to share regulatory burdens, particularly where local registrations or toll-manufacturing agreements are required. Firms are also investing in training and stewardship programs to strengthen on-farm adoption and to reduce compliance risk. Across the value chain, suppliers are prioritizing backward integration of critical precursors and forward integration of application services to capture value from end-to-end offerings.
Intellectual property strategies center on formulation improvements, emission-reduction technologies, and delivery hardware, while corporate sustainability commitments increasingly shape product roadmaps. For decision-makers, monitoring competitor activities in formulation science, application technology partnerships, and supply-chain reconfiguration provides early signals of shifting industry dynamics and potential collaboration opportunities.
Actionable strategic steps for firms to strengthen resilience, comply with evolving regulations, and adopt precision delivery technologies to protect crop performance and reputation
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic, actionable measures to navigate regulatory complexity, strengthen supply-chain resilience, and meet grower performance expectations. First, diversify procurement channels and qualify multiple suppliers for critical precursors and packaging to reduce exposure to trade disruptions and tariff-driven cost variability. Complement supplier diversification with strategic inventory planning and contractual flexibility to allow rapid adjustments to changing logistics conditions.
Second, accelerate investment in precision application technologies and emissions-control engineering to improve efficacy while meeting tightening environmental and worker-safety requirements. Integrating advanced shank injection systems, soil drip solutions, and soil gas monitoring will improve placement accuracy and reduce off-target movement. These investments should be paired with intensive training programs for applicators and growers to ensure correct execution and to maximize return on technology investments.
Third, strengthen regulatory affairs and stewardship capabilities by building proactive registration roadmaps, expanding residue monitoring, and engaging with policymakers and extension services. Finally, pursue targeted collaborations across the value chain-including co-development with specialty formulators and service providers-to bring to market formulation and delivery innovations that balance efficacy, safety, and sustainability. Implementing these steps will help organizations preserve operational continuity and align product offerings with evolving stakeholder expectations.
A transparent, triangulated research approach using primary stakeholder interviews and targeted secondary validation to deliver defensible and operationally focused conclusions
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined primary engagement with industry stakeholders and rigorous secondary-source synthesis to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary research consisted of structured interviews with growers, crop consultants, formulation scientists, application-equipment manufacturers, and regulatory specialists to capture firsthand perspectives on efficacy, handling practices, and adoption barriers. Interviews were designed to surface operational constraints, stewardship practices, and technology adoption drivers across multiple crop systems.
Secondary research included a systematic review of regulatory documentation, peer-reviewed agronomic studies, patent filings related to formulation and application technologies, and trade data that illuminate supply-chain flows and logistical chokepoints. Where applicable, site-level case studies were employed to validate the practical performance of application methods such as shank injection, soil drip, and soil gas approaches, and to compare gaseous versus liquid formulation handling requirements.
Data synthesis combined qualitative insights with cross-validation across independent sources to reduce bias and to highlight recurring themes. Limitations include variability in regional reporting granularity and the evolving regulatory environment, which can change product authorization and labeling. To mitigate these constraints, the methodology emphasized triangulation and sought corroboration from multiple stakeholder types to produce a defensible and operationally relevant analysis.
A concise synthesis emphasizing coordinated innovation, stewardship, and regional adaptation as the pathway to sustainable soil fumigant usage and resilient supply chains
In conclusion, soil fumigant stewardship and commercial strategy are at an inflection point where regulatory demands, technological capability, and stakeholder expectations intersect. Achieving high agronomic performance while addressing safety and environmental concerns requires coordinated investment in formulation science, application engineering, and on-farm advisory systems. The most resilient organizations will combine supplier diversification, precision delivery adoption, and proactive regulatory engagement to manage operational risk and to support growers effectively.
Emerging alternatives and refinements to existing chemistries underscore the opportunity for product differentiation through emission reduction, safer handling, and integration with integrated pest management frameworks. Meanwhile, regional variation in regulatory and production systems necessitates localized commercialization plans and tailored extension efforts. By aligning commercial strategies with technological innovation and robust stewardship, industry participants can sustain crop protection outcomes while adapting to evolving societal and regulatory expectations.
Ultimately, the path forward is collaborative: manufacturers, applicators, advisors, and regulators must work together to advance safe, effective, and sustainable soil health practices that preserve productivity and market access for growers across diverse cropping systems.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
192 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Surging demand for biofumigant formulations integrating beneficial cover crops with soil fumigation
- 5.2. Rise in adoption of drip fumigation systems to enhance fumigant efficiency and reduce emissions
- 5.3. Regulatory pressures driving development of novel low-toxicity soil fumigants with reduced ozone depletion potential
- 5.4. Expansion of precision application technologies including sensor-driven fumigant injection systems in large-scale farms
- 5.5. Increased investment in research on microbial soil amendments as complementary alternatives to chemical fumigants
- 5.6. Growing market availability of methyl bromide replacements like 1,3-dichloropropene combined with chloropicrin
- 5.7. Shift towards integrated pest management strategies incorporating reduced-risk fumigants and biological controls in specialty crops
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Soil Fumigant Market, by Chemical Type
- 8.1. 1,3-Dichloropropene
- 8.2. Chloropicrin
- 8.3. Methyl Bromide
- 8.4. MITC Generators
- 8.4.1. Dazomet
- 8.4.2. Metam Potassium
- 8.4.3. Metam Sodium
- 9. Soil Fumigant Market, by Crop Type
- 9.1. Field Crops
- 9.2. Fruits & Nuts
- 9.2.1. Berries
- 9.2.2. Tree Nuts
- 9.3. Ornamentals
- 9.4. Vegetables
- 9.4.1. Fruit Vegetables
- 9.4.2. Leafy Vegetables
- 9.4.3. Root Vegetables
- 10. Soil Fumigant Market, by Application Method
- 10.1. Shank Injection
- 10.2. Soil Drip
- 10.3. Soil Gas
- 11. Soil Fumigant Market, by Form
- 11.1. Gaseous
- 11.2. Liquid
- 12. Soil Fumigant Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Soil Fumigant Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Soil Fumigant Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ADAMA Agricultural Solutions Ltd.
- 15.3.2. Agro Kanesho Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.3. AMVAC Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.4. Arkema S.A.
- 15.3.5. BASF SE
- 15.3.6. Bayer AG
- 15.3.7. Coromandel International Limited
- 15.3.8. Corteva Agriscience
- 15.3.9. Detia Degesch GmbH
- 15.3.10. Dhanuka Agritech Limited
- 15.3.11. Eastman Chemical Company
- 15.3.12. Excel Industries Limited
- 15.3.13. FMC Corporation
- 15.3.14. Gowan Company
- 15.3.15. HIL India Limited
- 15.3.16. ICL Group Ltd
- 15.3.17. Meghmani Organics Limited
- 15.3.18. Nufarm Limited
- 15.3.19. PI Industries Limited
- 15.3.20. Rallis India Limited
- 15.3.21. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.22. Syngenta AG
- 15.3.23. Tagros Chemicals India Limited
- 15.3.24. TriCal Group Inc.
- 15.3.25. UPL Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
