Social Commerce Market by Product Category (Apparel & Accessories, Beauty & Personal Care, Electronics & Media), Business Model (Business To Business, Business To Consumer, Consumer To Consumer), Commerce Format, Payment Method, Engagement Type, Customer
Description
The SOC-as-a-Service Market was valued at USD 7.91 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 8.85 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.48%, reaching USD 20.28 billion by 2032.
Understanding the Emerging Imperatives and Strategic Advantages of Security Operations as a Service Amid a Rapidly Evolving Cybersecurity Threat Environment
Security Operations as a Service has emerged as a critical paradigm in the face of escalating cyber threats, a landscape where traditional security models struggle to keep pace. Enterprises are under constant pressure to detect sophisticated attacks in real time, maintain compliance with evolving regulations, and optimize resource allocation without compromising protection.
In response, organizations are increasingly turning to managed security operations that blend advanced analytics, threat intelligence, and rapid incident response. By outsourcing core security functions, businesses achieve economies of scale and access specialized expertise that is often cost-prohibitive to build in-house. This shift also allows internal teams to focus on strategic initiatives such as threat hunting and risk management rather than routine monitoring tasks.
Moreover, the digital transformation of core business processes has heightened the need for security services that adapt to hybrid IT environments. With workloads spread across cloud, on-premise, and edge infrastructures, a unified, service-oriented approach ensures consistent visibility and control. As a result, the Security Operations as a Service model has become a strategic imperative, offering both resilience and agility in an era defined by continuous cyber evolution.
Examining the Strategic Paradigm Shifts and Technological Advancements Reshaping the Security Operations as a Service Landscape in Modern Enterprises
The Security Operations as a Service landscape has witnessed profound technological and strategic shifts as organizations seek to stay ahead of increasingly automated threats. Cloud adoption continues to rise, prompting service providers to integrate native cloud security controls with advanced detection engines. At the same time, artificial intelligence and machine learning have become indispensable for real-time anomaly detection, reducing intervention time from hours to minutes.
Furthermore, the convergence of threat intelligence feeds with security orchestration, automation, and response capabilities has redefined incident management. Security teams are leveraging automated playbooks to isolate threats, enrich incident data, and execute remediation steps without manual intervention. As a result, response times have shrunk significantly, and the risk of human error has diminished.
In parallel, regulatory demands around data privacy and breach notifications have heightened. Service providers have responded by building compliance frameworks into their offerings, ensuring continuous alignment with global standards. Consequently, organizations benefit from streamlined reporting, audit readiness, and risk mitigation-key factors that have shifted the industry from reactive monitoring to proactive defense.
Assessing the Compounding Effects of United States Tariffs Introduction in 2025 on Security Operations as a Service Cost Structures and Service Models
When the United States introduced new tariffs in 2025, cybersecurity services felt the ripple effects through elevated costs and disrupted supply chains. Hardware components vital for on-site detection infrastructures became more expensive, compelling service providers to reevaluate sourcing strategies and renegotiate vendor agreements.
Simultaneously, software licensing costs also saw a marginal increase, driving many providers to enhance their cloud-native offerings. By prioritizing software-defined security solutions, they mitigated the impact of hardware price inflation and maintained competitive service pricing. Transitioning from capital expenditure-intensive models to subscription-based services allowed customers to spread costs over time and avoid large upfront investments.
Moreover, the tariffs accelerated the adoption of domestic manufacturing for critical security appliances. Providers formed strategic partnerships with regional vendors to ensure uninterrupted supply and compliance with import regulations. This shift not only reduced lead times but also bolstered local economies. Ultimately, the 2025 tariff changes catalyzed innovation in service delivery models, pushing the industry toward more flexible, resilient, and cost-effective architectures.
Illuminating the Critical Dimensions of Market Segmentation Driving Growth in Security Operations as a Service across Service Types Organization Sizes and More
Analyzing the market through the lens of service offerings reveals a nuanced demand for specialized capabilities, ranging from incident response and forensics to managed detection and response, as well as managed SIEM and SOAR services. Organizations are also seeking expertise in threat hunting and analysis, threat intelligence, and vulnerability and risk management. This diversity of needs underscores the importance of modular service portfolios that can be tailored to specific operational demands.
Organizational size further influences service selection and engagement models. Large enterprises often require fully managed, end-to-end security operations, leveraging extensive threat intelligence and automated response capabilities. In contrast, smaller organizations and medium-sized businesses frequently adopt more targeted engagements, focusing on high-impact services such as vulnerability management and managed detection.
Deployment preferences also play a significant role. Cloud-based delivery has gained traction due to its scalability and rapid provisioning, while certain sectors continue to mandate on-premise deployments for regulatory or legacy integration reasons. Each model presents unique advantages in latency, data residency, and control.
From an application standpoint, the emphasis spans across application security, cloud security, endpoint security, and network security. This reflects the imperative to protect both traditional infrastructure and emerging environments. Industry verticals such as banking, financial services, and insurance; energy and utilities; government and public sector; healthcare and life sciences; IT and telecommunications; retail and e-commerce; and transportation and logistics each exhibit distinct security requirements and risk profiles, driving demand for tailored service offerings.
Unraveling the Distinct Regional Dynamics Influencing the Adoption and Delivery of Security Operations as a Service across Major Global Markets
Regional dynamics shape both adoption rates and service delivery models for Security Operations as a Service. In the Americas, maturity levels are high, driven by stringent regulatory landscapes and a robust ecosystem of service providers. Organizations in this region often lead in deploying advanced analytics and real-time threat intelligence to support 24/7 operations.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and regional data sovereignty requirements inform deployment strategies. Service providers in EMEA emphasize localized data handling and compliance integration, offering region-specific modules that address diverse legislative mandates. This approach ensures that multinational enterprises can maintain uniform security postures across multiple jurisdictions.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digitalization and burgeoning cloud adoption have catalyzed demand for agile, scalable security services. Countries with nascent cybersecurity frameworks are leapfrogging toward managed models to accelerate maturity. Meanwhile, established economies invest heavily in artificial intelligence–driven threat detection to combat sophisticated cyber adversaries. As a result, APAC has emerged as one of the fastest-growing markets, with providers tailoring solutions to meet the dual needs of cost efficiency and advanced threat mitigation.
Profiling the Leading Providers and Strategic Innovations Defining Competitive Positioning in Security Operations as a Service Space
The competitive landscape is defined by established technology firms and specialized cybersecurity providers that continue to innovate through strategic acquisitions, partnerships, and product enhancements. Market leaders are expanding their service portfolios to integrate advanced threat intelligence, automated response workflows, and compliance management tools.
Key providers are differentiating through proprietary analytics platforms that correlate vast datasets, enabling predictive threat detection and dynamic risk scoring. Others focus on building robust partner ecosystems to deliver industry-specific solutions, leveraging domain expertise from sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure.
Moreover, collaboration with cloud hyperscalers has become a critical go-to-market strategy. Providers embed security operations directly into major cloud platforms, offering clients seamless integration and unified management consoles. This trend highlights a future where security is not an afterthought but a native component of digital transformation initiatives.
Strategic Roadmap and Practical Recommendations for Industry Leaders to Maximize Security Operations as a Service Efficiency and Resilience
To maximize the impact of Security Operations as a Service, industry leaders should prioritize hybrid delivery models that balance cloud-native agility with on-premise control. By adopting modular service bundles, organizations can align security investments directly with risk exposure and operational objectives.
Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into detection and response workflows remains a key differentiator. Leaders must evaluate providers based on their ability to supply transparent, explainable AI models that enhance threat prioritization and streamline analyst workflows. Investing in such capabilities reduces mean time to detect and contain incidents.
Further, establishing formalized governance and compliance frameworks is essential. Organizations should insist on continuous compliance monitoring and automated reporting to meet evolving regulatory requirements. This approach not only mitigates risk but also provides valuable operational insights.
Finally, cultivating a collaborative culture between in-house security teams and service providers enhances resilience. Regular joint exercises, threat intelligence sharing, and co-development of incident response playbooks foster mutual understanding and accelerate decision making during critical events.
Comprehensive Overview of Methodological Framework and Data Validation Processes Underpinning the Security Operations as a Service Market Study
This research study was built upon a dual approach of primary and secondary data collection to ensure a robust and reliable analysis. Secondary research involved examining industry publications, white papers, regulatory guidance, and vendor technical briefs to establish foundational insights.
Primary research comprised in-depth interviews with senior security executives, managed service providers, industry analysts, and end-users across multiple regions. These conversations provided qualitative perspectives on adoption drivers, service expectations, and emerging challenges.
Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile conflicting information and validate key findings. Quantitative data points were cross-checked against publicly available financial results, vendor disclosures, and industry survey results where permissible.
Finally, expert panel reviews and iterative feedback loops ensured that the study’s conclusions accurately reflect current market realities. This rigorous methodology underpins the strategic analysis and recommendations presented, providing readers with confidence in the report’s integrity.
Synthesizing Key Findings to Highlight the Future Trajectory and Strategic Imperatives of Security Operations as a Service Solutions
Throughout this study, clear themes have emerged around the necessity of agility, automation, and integration in security operations. The evolution from legacy, siloed monitoring systems to fully managed, intelligence-driven services has fundamentally altered how organizations approach cyber risk.
Key transformational drivers include the adoption of cloud-native architectures, the integration of AI-powered threat detection, and the imperative to comply with complex regulatory environments. These factors, combined with evolving tariff landscapes and supply chain considerations, underscore the urgency for adaptable service models.
As enterprises move forward, a strategic focus on hybrid delivery, transparent AI capabilities, and continuous compliance will differentiate success stories from the rest. The most resilient organizations will be those that treat security as an integral component of business strategy rather than a standalone function.
Ultimately, the trajectory of Security Operations as a Service suggests an ecosystem where proactive risk intelligence, rapid automation, and seamless integration define the new standard of cyber resilience.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Understanding the Emerging Imperatives and Strategic Advantages of Security Operations as a Service Amid a Rapidly Evolving Cybersecurity Threat Environment
Security Operations as a Service has emerged as a critical paradigm in the face of escalating cyber threats, a landscape where traditional security models struggle to keep pace. Enterprises are under constant pressure to detect sophisticated attacks in real time, maintain compliance with evolving regulations, and optimize resource allocation without compromising protection.
In response, organizations are increasingly turning to managed security operations that blend advanced analytics, threat intelligence, and rapid incident response. By outsourcing core security functions, businesses achieve economies of scale and access specialized expertise that is often cost-prohibitive to build in-house. This shift also allows internal teams to focus on strategic initiatives such as threat hunting and risk management rather than routine monitoring tasks.
Moreover, the digital transformation of core business processes has heightened the need for security services that adapt to hybrid IT environments. With workloads spread across cloud, on-premise, and edge infrastructures, a unified, service-oriented approach ensures consistent visibility and control. As a result, the Security Operations as a Service model has become a strategic imperative, offering both resilience and agility in an era defined by continuous cyber evolution.
Examining the Strategic Paradigm Shifts and Technological Advancements Reshaping the Security Operations as a Service Landscape in Modern Enterprises
The Security Operations as a Service landscape has witnessed profound technological and strategic shifts as organizations seek to stay ahead of increasingly automated threats. Cloud adoption continues to rise, prompting service providers to integrate native cloud security controls with advanced detection engines. At the same time, artificial intelligence and machine learning have become indispensable for real-time anomaly detection, reducing intervention time from hours to minutes.
Furthermore, the convergence of threat intelligence feeds with security orchestration, automation, and response capabilities has redefined incident management. Security teams are leveraging automated playbooks to isolate threats, enrich incident data, and execute remediation steps without manual intervention. As a result, response times have shrunk significantly, and the risk of human error has diminished.
In parallel, regulatory demands around data privacy and breach notifications have heightened. Service providers have responded by building compliance frameworks into their offerings, ensuring continuous alignment with global standards. Consequently, organizations benefit from streamlined reporting, audit readiness, and risk mitigation-key factors that have shifted the industry from reactive monitoring to proactive defense.
Assessing the Compounding Effects of United States Tariffs Introduction in 2025 on Security Operations as a Service Cost Structures and Service Models
When the United States introduced new tariffs in 2025, cybersecurity services felt the ripple effects through elevated costs and disrupted supply chains. Hardware components vital for on-site detection infrastructures became more expensive, compelling service providers to reevaluate sourcing strategies and renegotiate vendor agreements.
Simultaneously, software licensing costs also saw a marginal increase, driving many providers to enhance their cloud-native offerings. By prioritizing software-defined security solutions, they mitigated the impact of hardware price inflation and maintained competitive service pricing. Transitioning from capital expenditure-intensive models to subscription-based services allowed customers to spread costs over time and avoid large upfront investments.
Moreover, the tariffs accelerated the adoption of domestic manufacturing for critical security appliances. Providers formed strategic partnerships with regional vendors to ensure uninterrupted supply and compliance with import regulations. This shift not only reduced lead times but also bolstered local economies. Ultimately, the 2025 tariff changes catalyzed innovation in service delivery models, pushing the industry toward more flexible, resilient, and cost-effective architectures.
Illuminating the Critical Dimensions of Market Segmentation Driving Growth in Security Operations as a Service across Service Types Organization Sizes and More
Analyzing the market through the lens of service offerings reveals a nuanced demand for specialized capabilities, ranging from incident response and forensics to managed detection and response, as well as managed SIEM and SOAR services. Organizations are also seeking expertise in threat hunting and analysis, threat intelligence, and vulnerability and risk management. This diversity of needs underscores the importance of modular service portfolios that can be tailored to specific operational demands.
Organizational size further influences service selection and engagement models. Large enterprises often require fully managed, end-to-end security operations, leveraging extensive threat intelligence and automated response capabilities. In contrast, smaller organizations and medium-sized businesses frequently adopt more targeted engagements, focusing on high-impact services such as vulnerability management and managed detection.
Deployment preferences also play a significant role. Cloud-based delivery has gained traction due to its scalability and rapid provisioning, while certain sectors continue to mandate on-premise deployments for regulatory or legacy integration reasons. Each model presents unique advantages in latency, data residency, and control.
From an application standpoint, the emphasis spans across application security, cloud security, endpoint security, and network security. This reflects the imperative to protect both traditional infrastructure and emerging environments. Industry verticals such as banking, financial services, and insurance; energy and utilities; government and public sector; healthcare and life sciences; IT and telecommunications; retail and e-commerce; and transportation and logistics each exhibit distinct security requirements and risk profiles, driving demand for tailored service offerings.
Unraveling the Distinct Regional Dynamics Influencing the Adoption and Delivery of Security Operations as a Service across Major Global Markets
Regional dynamics shape both adoption rates and service delivery models for Security Operations as a Service. In the Americas, maturity levels are high, driven by stringent regulatory landscapes and a robust ecosystem of service providers. Organizations in this region often lead in deploying advanced analytics and real-time threat intelligence to support 24/7 operations.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and regional data sovereignty requirements inform deployment strategies. Service providers in EMEA emphasize localized data handling and compliance integration, offering region-specific modules that address diverse legislative mandates. This approach ensures that multinational enterprises can maintain uniform security postures across multiple jurisdictions.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digitalization and burgeoning cloud adoption have catalyzed demand for agile, scalable security services. Countries with nascent cybersecurity frameworks are leapfrogging toward managed models to accelerate maturity. Meanwhile, established economies invest heavily in artificial intelligence–driven threat detection to combat sophisticated cyber adversaries. As a result, APAC has emerged as one of the fastest-growing markets, with providers tailoring solutions to meet the dual needs of cost efficiency and advanced threat mitigation.
Profiling the Leading Providers and Strategic Innovations Defining Competitive Positioning in Security Operations as a Service Space
The competitive landscape is defined by established technology firms and specialized cybersecurity providers that continue to innovate through strategic acquisitions, partnerships, and product enhancements. Market leaders are expanding their service portfolios to integrate advanced threat intelligence, automated response workflows, and compliance management tools.
Key providers are differentiating through proprietary analytics platforms that correlate vast datasets, enabling predictive threat detection and dynamic risk scoring. Others focus on building robust partner ecosystems to deliver industry-specific solutions, leveraging domain expertise from sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure.
Moreover, collaboration with cloud hyperscalers has become a critical go-to-market strategy. Providers embed security operations directly into major cloud platforms, offering clients seamless integration and unified management consoles. This trend highlights a future where security is not an afterthought but a native component of digital transformation initiatives.
Strategic Roadmap and Practical Recommendations for Industry Leaders to Maximize Security Operations as a Service Efficiency and Resilience
To maximize the impact of Security Operations as a Service, industry leaders should prioritize hybrid delivery models that balance cloud-native agility with on-premise control. By adopting modular service bundles, organizations can align security investments directly with risk exposure and operational objectives.
Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into detection and response workflows remains a key differentiator. Leaders must evaluate providers based on their ability to supply transparent, explainable AI models that enhance threat prioritization and streamline analyst workflows. Investing in such capabilities reduces mean time to detect and contain incidents.
Further, establishing formalized governance and compliance frameworks is essential. Organizations should insist on continuous compliance monitoring and automated reporting to meet evolving regulatory requirements. This approach not only mitigates risk but also provides valuable operational insights.
Finally, cultivating a collaborative culture between in-house security teams and service providers enhances resilience. Regular joint exercises, threat intelligence sharing, and co-development of incident response playbooks foster mutual understanding and accelerate decision making during critical events.
Comprehensive Overview of Methodological Framework and Data Validation Processes Underpinning the Security Operations as a Service Market Study
This research study was built upon a dual approach of primary and secondary data collection to ensure a robust and reliable analysis. Secondary research involved examining industry publications, white papers, regulatory guidance, and vendor technical briefs to establish foundational insights.
Primary research comprised in-depth interviews with senior security executives, managed service providers, industry analysts, and end-users across multiple regions. These conversations provided qualitative perspectives on adoption drivers, service expectations, and emerging challenges.
Data triangulation techniques were applied to reconcile conflicting information and validate key findings. Quantitative data points were cross-checked against publicly available financial results, vendor disclosures, and industry survey results where permissible.
Finally, expert panel reviews and iterative feedback loops ensured that the study’s conclusions accurately reflect current market realities. This rigorous methodology underpins the strategic analysis and recommendations presented, providing readers with confidence in the report’s integrity.
Synthesizing Key Findings to Highlight the Future Trajectory and Strategic Imperatives of Security Operations as a Service Solutions
Throughout this study, clear themes have emerged around the necessity of agility, automation, and integration in security operations. The evolution from legacy, siloed monitoring systems to fully managed, intelligence-driven services has fundamentally altered how organizations approach cyber risk.
Key transformational drivers include the adoption of cloud-native architectures, the integration of AI-powered threat detection, and the imperative to comply with complex regulatory environments. These factors, combined with evolving tariff landscapes and supply chain considerations, underscore the urgency for adaptable service models.
As enterprises move forward, a strategic focus on hybrid delivery, transparent AI capabilities, and continuous compliance will differentiate success stories from the rest. The most resilient organizations will be those that treat security as an integral component of business strategy rather than a standalone function.
Ultimately, the trajectory of Security Operations as a Service suggests an ecosystem where proactive risk intelligence, rapid automation, and seamless integration define the new standard of cyber resilience.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Leading social media platforms expanding live shopping events with integrated payment solutions to enhance user engagement
- 5.2. Brands leveraging augmented reality try-on tools on social commerce platforms to reduce returns and boost conversion rates
- 5.3. Influencers adopting affiliate links in short-video content to generate commission-based revenue through social shopping channels
- 5.4. AI-powered personalized recommendation engines optimizing product discovery on social marketplaces based on user behavior
- 5.5. Social commerce marketplaces partnering with microinfluencers for niche market penetration and authentic consumer engagement
- 5.6. Integration of user-generated video reviews into social storefronts to build trust and drive purchase decisions at scale
- 5.7. Cross-border social commerce features enabling small merchants to reach international audiences with streamlined logistics options
- 5.8. Direct-to-consumer labels building private social communities for members-only product drops, co-creation polls, and early access commerce experiences
- 5.9. Social platforms enhancing product tagging, catalog sync, and inventory visibility tools so merchants can manage multi-channel assortments in real time
- 5.10. Brands prioritizing sustainability storytelling and traceability badges within social product pages to influence environmentally conscious purchasing decisions
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Social Commerce Market, by Product Category
- 8.1. Apparel & Accessories
- 8.1.1. Children's Apparel
- 8.1.2. Men's Apparel
- 8.1.3. Women's Apparel
- 8.2. Beauty & Personal Care
- 8.2.1. Haircare
- 8.2.2. Makeup
- 8.2.3. Skincare
- 8.3. Electronics & Media
- 8.3.1. Home Appliances
- 8.3.2. Laptops
- 8.3.3. Smartphones
- 8.4. Food & Beverage
- 8.4.1. Beverages
- 8.4.2. Fresh Produce
- 8.4.3. Packaged Foods
- 8.5. Home & Living
- 8.5.1. Furniture
- 8.5.2. Home Decor
- 8.5.3. Kitchenware
- 9. Social Commerce Market, by Business Model
- 9.1. Business To Business
- 9.2. Business To Consumer
- 9.3. Consumer To Consumer
- 10. Social Commerce Market, by Commerce Format
- 10.1. Live Commerce
- 10.2. Shoppable Content
- 10.2.1. Shoppable Posts
- 10.2.2. Shoppable Videos
- 11. Social Commerce Market, by Payment Method
- 11.1. Bank Transfer
- 11.2. Cash On Delivery
- 11.3. Credit Card
- 11.4. Digital Wallet
- 12. Social Commerce Market, by Engagement Type
- 12.1. Content Driven
- 12.2. Influencer Driven
- 12.3. Peer Driven
- 13. Social Commerce Market, by Customer Demographic
- 13.1. Baby Boomers
- 13.2. Generation X
- 13.3. Generation Z
- 13.4. Millennials
- 14. Social Commerce Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Social Commerce Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Social Commerce Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Tencent Holdings Limited
- 17.3.2. Alibaba Group Holding Limited
- 17.3.3. Pinduoduo Inc.
- 17.3.4. ByteDance Ltd.
- 17.3.5. Meta Platforms, Inc.
- 17.3.6. Amazon.com, Inc.
- 17.3.7. JD.com, Inc.
- 17.3.8. Shopify Inc.
- 17.3.9. Pinterest, Inc.
- 17.3.10. Snap Inc.
- 17.3.11. Xingyin Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.12. Etsy, Inc.
- 17.3.13. Meesho Limited
- 17.3.14. Poshmark, Inc.
- 17.3.15. Yunji Inc.
- 17.3.16. X Corp.
- 17.3.17. Trell Experiences Private Limited
- 17.3.18. Relevant E-Solutions Private Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
