Smart Farming Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Crop Type (Cereals & Grains, Fruits & Vegetables, Oilseeds & Pulses), Application, Farm Size - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Smart Farming Market was valued at USD 22.16 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 25.65 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 15.70%, reaching USD 71.19 billion by 2032.
A concise strategic overview outlining why digital agriculture is essential for competitiveness, resilience, and operational excellence in modern farming
Introduction to the strategic imperative of smart farming for modern agricultural resilience and efficiency
Agriculture is undergoing a structural transformation driven by digitalization, environmental constraints, and a renewed focus on supply chain resilience. Advances in sensors, connectivity, analytics, and automation are converging to create capability sets that allow farm operators and agribusinesses to manage inputs with greater precision, improve resource-use efficiency, and respond dynamically to environmental variation. These capabilities matter across scales, from family-operated plots to large commercial estates, and they influence decisions about labor, capital deployment, and crop selection.
As the pace of technological adoption accelerates, stakeholders need concise, actionable intelligence to prioritize investments and partnerships. This executive-level overview synthesizes the most consequential shifts shaping smart farming today, identifies segmentation-driven adoption patterns, maps regional dynamics, and proposes practical priorities for industry leaders. The objective is to equip decision-makers with a clear understanding of where opportunities are emerging and what structural forces will determine success in the near to medium term.
Key structural and technological accelerators that are redefining how precision agriculture solutions are adopted, monetized, and scaled across farming operations
Transformative shifts reshaping the operational and commercial landscape of precision agriculture technologies
The agricultural technology landscape is being reshaped by several overlapping forces that collectively raise the bar for both innovation and operational integration. First, sensor fidelity and low-power wide-area connectivity have matured to the point where continuous field-level telemetry is feasible at commercial scale, enabling near-real-time decision support. Second, edge processing combined with cloud analytics allows for more sophisticated inference without prohibitive latency, making autonomous actuation and variable-rate interventions practical in many contexts. Third, a growing emphasis on sustainability and traceability has created new demand for technologies that can document resource inputs and environmental outcomes across the value chain.
Consequently, go-to-market models are shifting from one-off product sales toward recurring-service arrangements and platform-centric ecosystems. Vendors that can successfully bundle hardware, software, and ongoing services create higher switching costs and unlock richer data streams for continuous improvement. Meanwhile, partnerships across agronomy providers, equipment OEMs, and data platforms are increasingly common, as complementary capabilities are needed to deliver turnkey solutions. These structural shifts are prompting both incumbents and new entrants to revisit pricing, channel strategies, and product roadmaps to align with farm-level economics and regulatory expectations.
How changes in U.S. trade policy and tariff dynamics are likely to alter procurement, manufacturing footprint decisions, and deployment timelines for agricultural technology solutions in 2025
Cumulative effects of United States tariff developments anticipated to influence technology sourcing, supply chains, and adoption rhythms in 2025
Tariff policy adjustments can materially influence the cost base and supply chain configurations for smart farming technologies. When import duties or trade barriers rise, manufacturers and distributors often re-evaluate sourcing strategies, which can lead to longer lead times, higher component prices, and altered product portfolios. For agricultural technology vendors that rely on globalized supply chains for sensors, actuators, and specialized controllers, tariff shifts prompt immediate cost-management responses such as regional sourcing, supplier diversification, or passing increased costs to customers. These dynamics affect procurement timelines and can slow the pace of deployments in markets sensitive to capital expenditure timing.
Beyond direct cost effects, tariff changes can reshape strategic partnerships and localization decisions. Vendors may accelerate localization of assembly or select higher-value manufacturing steps to regions with preferential trade access, thereby protecting margin and delivery performance. Conversely, customers may prioritize modular architectures and software-driven functionality that reduce reliance on hardware-heavy imports. In addition, policy uncertainty around tariffs tends to raise the premium on supply chain visibility and contractual flexibility, making advanced logistics analytics and hedging strategies essential for managing project risk.
Deep segmentation analysis explaining how component, crop type, application, and farm size distinctions determine technology requirements and commercial strategies
Segmentation-driven dynamics revealing where technologies and services deliver the greatest operational leverage across components, crops, applications, and farm size
Component-level differentiation drives the pace and character of adoption. Hardware plays a foundational role through devices such as actuators, controllers, and sensors that capture field and machine data and enable automated interventions. Services complement this foundation by providing consulting expertise and support and maintenance functions that ensure uptime and best-practice deployment. Software layers translate raw signals into decision-grade intelligence, with data analytics software extracting patterns from telemetry and farm management software orchestrating workflows, planning, and compliance. Taken together, these component tiers interact: robust hardware and effective service models increase the value of software investments and reduce friction to adoption.
Crop-type segmentation shapes technical requirements and go-to-market approaches. For cereals and grains such as corn, rice, and wheat, the emphasis is often on scale-efficient sensing and yield optimization. Fruits and vegetables including grape, potato, and tomato typically demand higher-resolution monitoring, targeted climate control, and pest management capabilities. Oilseeds and pulses such as canola, chickpea, and soybean require specialized agronomic models and interventions aligned with soil health and crop rotation practices. Application-focused variations reflect different technology stacks; crop monitoring leverages drone imaging and satellite imaging for broad-area situational awareness, greenhouse monitoring relies on climate control and pest management systems for tightly controlled environments, livestock monitoring depends on behavior monitoring and health monitoring sensors to maintain welfare, precision farming centers on variable rate application and yield mapping for input optimization, and soil monitoring uses moisture monitoring and nutrient monitoring to inform fertility regimes. Farm size further differentiates requirements and purchasing behavior, with large farms favoring integration and scale, medium farms balancing cost and capability, and small farms prioritizing simplicity and clear return on investment.
Regional market characteristics that shape adoption velocity, partnership models, and localized go-to-market approaches across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional contours and localized drivers that determine adoption pathways and competitive dynamics across key global regions
Geographic context matters because regulatory frameworks, labor availability, infrastructure, and cropping systems vary widely. In the Americas, adoption tends to be influenced by scale economies, farm consolidation trends, and strong OEM networks that can integrate precision hardware with existing machinery fleets. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a patchwork of regulatory priorities, with sustainability mandates and subsidy programs often accelerating adoption in some markets while infrastructure limitations constrain it in others. In the Asia-Pacific region, high-density farming zones and government-driven digital agriculture initiatives create unique demand patterns, with significant interest in solutions that increase productivity per hectare and reduce post-harvest losses.
These regional dynamics also affect vendor strategies and partnership models. Supply chain logistics and after-sales support are more challenging in dispersed geographies, raising the value of local service networks and modular product designs. In addition, regional financing mechanisms and public programs can materially influence affordability and total cost of ownership calculations, causing adoption curves to differ markedly between regions even for identical technologies. Consequently, a nuanced regional go-to-market plan that aligns product configuration, pricing, and channel enablement with local agricultural practices and policy levers is critical for success.
Competitive positioning and ecosystem strategies that determine which companies capture value through integration, partnerships, and differentiated service models
Competitive and corporate landscape insights focusing on product strategies, partnership ecosystems, and value chain positioning
Competitive dynamics are increasingly defined by the ability to integrate hardware, software, and services into coherent, farm-ready solutions. Market leaders that have shifted from transactional sales to outcome-oriented contracts gain advantages through recurring revenue and richer operational data that inform continuous product improvement. Strategic partnerships between equipment manufacturers, software platform providers, and agronomy specialists create bundled offerings that reduce integration risk for end users. At the same time, specialized niche vendors are carving durable positions by solving high-value problems such as high-precision sensing, advanced edge analytics, or turnkey greenhouse automation.
Mergers and strategic alliances are common as companies seek to close capability gaps quickly and expand geographic reach. Investment focus tends to center on interoperability, data security, and compliance capabilities because these areas influence adoption among enterprise customers and institutional buyers. Additionally, companies that effectively demonstrate measurable agronomic outcomes and cost-efficiency gains secure stronger procurement consideration. As a result, product roadmaps that prioritize open standards, scalable cloud architectures, and clear service-level commitments are more likely to resonate with commercial adopters and institutional procurement teams.
Actionable strategic priorities and tactical interventions that leaders should deploy to scale solutions, secure long-term customer relationships, and demonstrate measurable farming outcomes
Practical, prioritized actions industry leaders should take to accelerate adoption, protect margins, and build defensible propositions across diverse farming contexts
First, prioritize modular product architectures that allow customers to scale capabilities incrementally while preserving interoperability. This reduces adoption friction and supports phased investment from small to large operations. Second, invest in robust service and support frameworks, including remote diagnostics and localized maintenance, to protect uptime and demonstrate total cost of ownership benefits. Third, strengthen data governance, security, and interoperability commitments to address buyer concerns and enable cross-vendor data flows that unlock higher-value analytics.
Moreover, winners will align commercial models with on-farm economics by offering financing alternatives, outcome-based contracts, or subscription structures that lower initial barriers to entry. Strategic partnerships with input suppliers, equipment OEMs, and regional integrators can broaden reach and provide complementary capabilities rapidly. Finally, continuous measurement and transparent reporting of agronomic outcomes, sustainability metrics, and operational efficiency improvements will become a critical differentiator when engaging enterprise and institutional customers seeking verifiable returns on technology investments.
Comprehensive research framework combining expert interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, and rigorous triangulation to ensure practical and reliable insights
Research approach detailing the methods used to synthesize primary insights and validate findings across multi-disciplinary data sources
This analysis synthesizes qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, subject-matter experts, and technology providers, combined with a structured review of technical literature, regulatory documents, and publicly available case studies. Primary engagements focused on real-world deployment experience, integration challenges, and customer value propositions, enabling a grounded understanding of operational constraints and success factors. Secondary research was used to contextualize technological maturity, policy shifts, and broader macro trends that shape adoption dynamics.
Findings were triangulated through cross-validation with multiple stakeholders to reduce bias and ensure robustness. The methodology emphasized practical utility, prioritizing insights that are actionable for commercial planning and investment decisions. Throughout the research process, attention was paid to regional nuances, component-level technical requirements, and the interplay between hardware, software, and service economics, which together drive deployment feasibility and long-term sustainability.
Final synthesis summarizing how integrated technology, service excellence, and regional nuance combine to determine adoption success and long-term value creation
Concluding synthesis highlighting the strategic implications for investors, technology providers, and agricultural stakeholders seeking to harness digital agriculture
Smart farming technologies are not a single innovation but rather an integrated set of capabilities that, when combined, materially enhance farming resilience and resource efficiency. The most significant opportunities lie at the intersection of reliable sensing hardware, interoperable software platforms, and service models that lower operational risk for adopters. Adoption pathways will differ by crop type, application, and farm size, and regional policy and infrastructure considerations will continue to shape where and how solutions scale. Therefore, stakeholders should pursue differentiated strategies grounded in clear value demonstrations and flexible commercial models.
In the near to medium term, firms that emphasize modularity, service excellence, and transparent outcome measurement will be best positioned to capture sustained value. Additionally, proactive supply chain and sourcing strategies will be essential to navigate trade policy fluctuations and component availability challenges. By focusing on these priorities, industry participants can accelerate adoption while mitigating key operational and commercial risks.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise strategic overview outlining why digital agriculture is essential for competitiveness, resilience, and operational excellence in modern farming
Introduction to the strategic imperative of smart farming for modern agricultural resilience and efficiency
Agriculture is undergoing a structural transformation driven by digitalization, environmental constraints, and a renewed focus on supply chain resilience. Advances in sensors, connectivity, analytics, and automation are converging to create capability sets that allow farm operators and agribusinesses to manage inputs with greater precision, improve resource-use efficiency, and respond dynamically to environmental variation. These capabilities matter across scales, from family-operated plots to large commercial estates, and they influence decisions about labor, capital deployment, and crop selection.
As the pace of technological adoption accelerates, stakeholders need concise, actionable intelligence to prioritize investments and partnerships. This executive-level overview synthesizes the most consequential shifts shaping smart farming today, identifies segmentation-driven adoption patterns, maps regional dynamics, and proposes practical priorities for industry leaders. The objective is to equip decision-makers with a clear understanding of where opportunities are emerging and what structural forces will determine success in the near to medium term.
Key structural and technological accelerators that are redefining how precision agriculture solutions are adopted, monetized, and scaled across farming operations
Transformative shifts reshaping the operational and commercial landscape of precision agriculture technologies
The agricultural technology landscape is being reshaped by several overlapping forces that collectively raise the bar for both innovation and operational integration. First, sensor fidelity and low-power wide-area connectivity have matured to the point where continuous field-level telemetry is feasible at commercial scale, enabling near-real-time decision support. Second, edge processing combined with cloud analytics allows for more sophisticated inference without prohibitive latency, making autonomous actuation and variable-rate interventions practical in many contexts. Third, a growing emphasis on sustainability and traceability has created new demand for technologies that can document resource inputs and environmental outcomes across the value chain.
Consequently, go-to-market models are shifting from one-off product sales toward recurring-service arrangements and platform-centric ecosystems. Vendors that can successfully bundle hardware, software, and ongoing services create higher switching costs and unlock richer data streams for continuous improvement. Meanwhile, partnerships across agronomy providers, equipment OEMs, and data platforms are increasingly common, as complementary capabilities are needed to deliver turnkey solutions. These structural shifts are prompting both incumbents and new entrants to revisit pricing, channel strategies, and product roadmaps to align with farm-level economics and regulatory expectations.
How changes in U.S. trade policy and tariff dynamics are likely to alter procurement, manufacturing footprint decisions, and deployment timelines for agricultural technology solutions in 2025
Cumulative effects of United States tariff developments anticipated to influence technology sourcing, supply chains, and adoption rhythms in 2025
Tariff policy adjustments can materially influence the cost base and supply chain configurations for smart farming technologies. When import duties or trade barriers rise, manufacturers and distributors often re-evaluate sourcing strategies, which can lead to longer lead times, higher component prices, and altered product portfolios. For agricultural technology vendors that rely on globalized supply chains for sensors, actuators, and specialized controllers, tariff shifts prompt immediate cost-management responses such as regional sourcing, supplier diversification, or passing increased costs to customers. These dynamics affect procurement timelines and can slow the pace of deployments in markets sensitive to capital expenditure timing.
Beyond direct cost effects, tariff changes can reshape strategic partnerships and localization decisions. Vendors may accelerate localization of assembly or select higher-value manufacturing steps to regions with preferential trade access, thereby protecting margin and delivery performance. Conversely, customers may prioritize modular architectures and software-driven functionality that reduce reliance on hardware-heavy imports. In addition, policy uncertainty around tariffs tends to raise the premium on supply chain visibility and contractual flexibility, making advanced logistics analytics and hedging strategies essential for managing project risk.
Deep segmentation analysis explaining how component, crop type, application, and farm size distinctions determine technology requirements and commercial strategies
Segmentation-driven dynamics revealing where technologies and services deliver the greatest operational leverage across components, crops, applications, and farm size
Component-level differentiation drives the pace and character of adoption. Hardware plays a foundational role through devices such as actuators, controllers, and sensors that capture field and machine data and enable automated interventions. Services complement this foundation by providing consulting expertise and support and maintenance functions that ensure uptime and best-practice deployment. Software layers translate raw signals into decision-grade intelligence, with data analytics software extracting patterns from telemetry and farm management software orchestrating workflows, planning, and compliance. Taken together, these component tiers interact: robust hardware and effective service models increase the value of software investments and reduce friction to adoption.
Crop-type segmentation shapes technical requirements and go-to-market approaches. For cereals and grains such as corn, rice, and wheat, the emphasis is often on scale-efficient sensing and yield optimization. Fruits and vegetables including grape, potato, and tomato typically demand higher-resolution monitoring, targeted climate control, and pest management capabilities. Oilseeds and pulses such as canola, chickpea, and soybean require specialized agronomic models and interventions aligned with soil health and crop rotation practices. Application-focused variations reflect different technology stacks; crop monitoring leverages drone imaging and satellite imaging for broad-area situational awareness, greenhouse monitoring relies on climate control and pest management systems for tightly controlled environments, livestock monitoring depends on behavior monitoring and health monitoring sensors to maintain welfare, precision farming centers on variable rate application and yield mapping for input optimization, and soil monitoring uses moisture monitoring and nutrient monitoring to inform fertility regimes. Farm size further differentiates requirements and purchasing behavior, with large farms favoring integration and scale, medium farms balancing cost and capability, and small farms prioritizing simplicity and clear return on investment.
Regional market characteristics that shape adoption velocity, partnership models, and localized go-to-market approaches across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional contours and localized drivers that determine adoption pathways and competitive dynamics across key global regions
Geographic context matters because regulatory frameworks, labor availability, infrastructure, and cropping systems vary widely. In the Americas, adoption tends to be influenced by scale economies, farm consolidation trends, and strong OEM networks that can integrate precision hardware with existing machinery fleets. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a patchwork of regulatory priorities, with sustainability mandates and subsidy programs often accelerating adoption in some markets while infrastructure limitations constrain it in others. In the Asia-Pacific region, high-density farming zones and government-driven digital agriculture initiatives create unique demand patterns, with significant interest in solutions that increase productivity per hectare and reduce post-harvest losses.
These regional dynamics also affect vendor strategies and partnership models. Supply chain logistics and after-sales support are more challenging in dispersed geographies, raising the value of local service networks and modular product designs. In addition, regional financing mechanisms and public programs can materially influence affordability and total cost of ownership calculations, causing adoption curves to differ markedly between regions even for identical technologies. Consequently, a nuanced regional go-to-market plan that aligns product configuration, pricing, and channel enablement with local agricultural practices and policy levers is critical for success.
Competitive positioning and ecosystem strategies that determine which companies capture value through integration, partnerships, and differentiated service models
Competitive and corporate landscape insights focusing on product strategies, partnership ecosystems, and value chain positioning
Competitive dynamics are increasingly defined by the ability to integrate hardware, software, and services into coherent, farm-ready solutions. Market leaders that have shifted from transactional sales to outcome-oriented contracts gain advantages through recurring revenue and richer operational data that inform continuous product improvement. Strategic partnerships between equipment manufacturers, software platform providers, and agronomy specialists create bundled offerings that reduce integration risk for end users. At the same time, specialized niche vendors are carving durable positions by solving high-value problems such as high-precision sensing, advanced edge analytics, or turnkey greenhouse automation.
Mergers and strategic alliances are common as companies seek to close capability gaps quickly and expand geographic reach. Investment focus tends to center on interoperability, data security, and compliance capabilities because these areas influence adoption among enterprise customers and institutional buyers. Additionally, companies that effectively demonstrate measurable agronomic outcomes and cost-efficiency gains secure stronger procurement consideration. As a result, product roadmaps that prioritize open standards, scalable cloud architectures, and clear service-level commitments are more likely to resonate with commercial adopters and institutional procurement teams.
Actionable strategic priorities and tactical interventions that leaders should deploy to scale solutions, secure long-term customer relationships, and demonstrate measurable farming outcomes
Practical, prioritized actions industry leaders should take to accelerate adoption, protect margins, and build defensible propositions across diverse farming contexts
First, prioritize modular product architectures that allow customers to scale capabilities incrementally while preserving interoperability. This reduces adoption friction and supports phased investment from small to large operations. Second, invest in robust service and support frameworks, including remote diagnostics and localized maintenance, to protect uptime and demonstrate total cost of ownership benefits. Third, strengthen data governance, security, and interoperability commitments to address buyer concerns and enable cross-vendor data flows that unlock higher-value analytics.
Moreover, winners will align commercial models with on-farm economics by offering financing alternatives, outcome-based contracts, or subscription structures that lower initial barriers to entry. Strategic partnerships with input suppliers, equipment OEMs, and regional integrators can broaden reach and provide complementary capabilities rapidly. Finally, continuous measurement and transparent reporting of agronomic outcomes, sustainability metrics, and operational efficiency improvements will become a critical differentiator when engaging enterprise and institutional customers seeking verifiable returns on technology investments.
Comprehensive research framework combining expert interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, and rigorous triangulation to ensure practical and reliable insights
Research approach detailing the methods used to synthesize primary insights and validate findings across multi-disciplinary data sources
This analysis synthesizes qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, subject-matter experts, and technology providers, combined with a structured review of technical literature, regulatory documents, and publicly available case studies. Primary engagements focused on real-world deployment experience, integration challenges, and customer value propositions, enabling a grounded understanding of operational constraints and success factors. Secondary research was used to contextualize technological maturity, policy shifts, and broader macro trends that shape adoption dynamics.
Findings were triangulated through cross-validation with multiple stakeholders to reduce bias and ensure robustness. The methodology emphasized practical utility, prioritizing insights that are actionable for commercial planning and investment decisions. Throughout the research process, attention was paid to regional nuances, component-level technical requirements, and the interplay between hardware, software, and service economics, which together drive deployment feasibility and long-term sustainability.
Final synthesis summarizing how integrated technology, service excellence, and regional nuance combine to determine adoption success and long-term value creation
Concluding synthesis highlighting the strategic implications for investors, technology providers, and agricultural stakeholders seeking to harness digital agriculture
Smart farming technologies are not a single innovation but rather an integrated set of capabilities that, when combined, materially enhance farming resilience and resource efficiency. The most significant opportunities lie at the intersection of reliable sensing hardware, interoperable software platforms, and service models that lower operational risk for adopters. Adoption pathways will differ by crop type, application, and farm size, and regional policy and infrastructure considerations will continue to shape where and how solutions scale. Therefore, stakeholders should pursue differentiated strategies grounded in clear value demonstrations and flexible commercial models.
In the near to medium term, firms that emphasize modularity, service excellence, and transparent outcome measurement will be best positioned to capture sustained value. Additionally, proactive supply chain and sourcing strategies will be essential to navigate trade policy fluctuations and component availability challenges. By focusing on these priorities, industry participants can accelerate adoption while mitigating key operational and commercial risks.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven predictive analytics platforms for precise crop yield forecasting
- 5.2. Deployment of IoT-enabled soil moisture sensors with real-time alerts for irrigation management
- 5.3. Implementation of autonomous drones equipped with multispectral cameras for crop health monitoring
- 5.4. Utilization of blockchain traceability solutions to ensure transparent supply chain operations in agriculture
- 5.5. Expansion of vertical farming systems integrating LED lighting and hydroponic technologies for urban crop production
- 5.6. Development of robotics for automated harvesting and post-harvest handling to reduce labor dependency on farms
- 5.7. Adoption of machine learning models for pest detection and targeted biocontrol interventions in field operations
- 5.8. Application of edge computing and 5G connectivity to support low-latency decision-making in precision agriculture
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Smart Farming Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Actuators
- 8.1.2. Controllers
- 8.1.3. Sensors
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Consulting
- 8.2.2. Support & Maintenance
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Data Analytics Software
- 8.3.2. Farm Management Software
- 9. Smart Farming Market, by Crop Type
- 9.1. Cereals & Grains
- 9.1.1. Corn
- 9.1.2. Rice
- 9.1.3. Wheat
- 9.2. Fruits & Vegetables
- 9.2.1. Grape
- 9.2.2. Potato
- 9.2.3. Tomato
- 9.3. Oilseeds & Pulses
- 9.3.1. Canola
- 9.3.2. Chickpea
- 9.3.3. Soybean
- 10. Smart Farming Market, by Application
- 10.1. Crop Monitoring
- 10.1.1. Drone Imaging
- 10.1.2. Satellite Imaging
- 10.2. Greenhouse Monitoring
- 10.2.1. Climate Control
- 10.2.2. Pest Management
- 10.3. Livestock Monitoring
- 10.3.1. Behavior Monitoring
- 10.3.2. Health Monitoring
- 10.4. Precision Farming
- 10.4.1. Variable Rate Application
- 10.4.2. Yield Mapping
- 10.5. Soil Monitoring
- 10.5.1. Moisture Monitoring
- 10.5.2. Nutrient Monitoring
- 11. Smart Farming Market, by Farm Size
- 11.1. Large Farms
- 11.2. Medium Farms
- 11.3. Small Farms
- 12. Smart Farming Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Smart Farming Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Smart Farming Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Deere & Company
- 15.3.2. CNH Industrial N.V.
- 15.3.3. AGCO Corporation
- 15.3.4. Trimble Inc.
- 15.3.5. Topcon Corporation
- 15.3.6. Raven Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Kubota Corporation
- 15.3.8. Yanmar Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.9. CLAAS KGaA mbH
- 15.3.10. Kubota Corporation
- 15.3.11. SDF S.p.A.
- 15.3.12. Kuhn S.A.
- 15.3.13. Lely Industries N.V.
- 15.3.14. GEA Group AG
- 15.3.15. BouMatic
- 15.3.16. Allflex
- 15.3.17. Afimilk Ltd.
- 15.3.18. DeLaval
- 15.3.19. PrecisionHawk Inc.
- 15.3.20. Farmers Edge Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
