Shrink Sleeve Labels Market by Material (Oriented Polystyrene, Polyethylene Terephthalate, Polylactic Acid), Container Type (Bottle, Can, Jar), Printing Technology, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Shrink Sleeve Labels Market was valued at USD 16.47 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 17.34 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.34%, reaching USD 24.99 billion by 2032.
An informed and balanced introduction explaining how shrink sleeve technology unites branding ambitions with technical and regulatory packaging realities
Shrink sleeve labeling sits at the intersection of branding, functionality, and sustainability for product packaging across multiple industries. As consumers increasingly demand premium aesthetics, tactile differentiation, and clear product storytelling, shrink sleeve technology has matured to provide near-full-body decoration, enhanced tamper-evidence, and design freedom not available with traditional labels. Concurrently, advances in substrates, printing fidelity, and application machinery have reduced historical barriers to adoption, enabling more product teams to consider sleeves as a primary packaging decoration strategy rather than a specialty solution.
The packaging ecosystem is responding to these shifts with investments in inline application systems, higher-resolution digital printing capabilities, and coatings that improve recyclability or compostability. At the same time, brand owners face mounting regulatory and voluntary requirements around recyclability and material transparency, which influence material selection and end-of-life strategies. These converging pressures make shrink sleeves both a marketing lever and a technical challenge, demanding closer collaboration between marketing, procurement, and packaging engineers to translate design ambitions into manufacturable, compliant, and cost-effective solutions.
How technological advances and shifting sustainability and retail demands are reshaping shrink sleeve strategies and supplier ecosystems in the packaging industry
Recent years have produced transformative shifts in the shrink sleeve landscape driven by technology, sustainability expectations, and evolving retail dynamics. Digital printing has accelerated a move toward shorter runs and hyper-personalized packaging while maintaining high-resolution imagery that supports premiumization. This technological momentum dovetails with improvements in materials, where bio-based polymers and mono-material constructions are being evaluated to address circularity goals without sacrificing application performance or print quality. Meanwhile, the retail environment is pushing for packaging that stands out on shelf but also complies with increasingly stringent recyclability criteria, creating tension that manufacturers and brands must actively manage.
Supply chain reconfiguration and a renewed focus on nearshoring have also altered how sleeve suppliers and converters design their fulfillment models, with an emphasis on flexibility and responsiveness. Brands are adapting to omnichannel realities by prioritizing packaging that performs equally well in physical stores and direct-to-consumer shipments, which affects seam strength, label adhesion, and substrate selection. Collectively, these changes are transforming shrink sleeves from a niche decorative option into a strategic packaging component that requires integrated planning across design, operations, and sustainability teams.
Anticipate and adapt to the practical supply chain and sourcing consequences of trade measures implemented by the United States in two thousand twenty-five that affect shrink sleeve inputs
Trade policy shifts, including tariff measures enacted by the United States that take effect in the coming year, will influence procurement economics, sourcing choices, and supplier relationships across the shrink sleeve value chain. Tariff adjustments alter landed costs for imported substrates, inks, and finished sleeves, prompting buyers to reassess supplier portfolios, evaluate alternative materials, and explore domestic or regional supply options to reduce exposure. For many organizations, the immediate impact will be an operational reassessment that weighs total landed cost against lead time, quality consistency, and the risk of future policy changes.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs can accelerate longer-term strategic moves such as supplier diversification, qualification of local converters, and investments in in-house application capability. Companies that proactively model tariff scenarios and engage with logistics and procurement partners will navigate these changes with less disruption. Importantly, the policy environment also incentivizes material innovation: brands and converters may prioritize substrates and inks that are more readily available from tariff-favored jurisdictions or that enable more efficient production to offset increased import costs. In this way, trade measures act as a catalyst that reshapes supply networks and accelerates decisions about where and how shrink sleeves are produced and applied.
Deep segmentation-driven insights revealing how application, material, container geometry, and printing technology jointly determine strategy and supplier selection
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated drivers and constraints across applications, materials, container types, and printing technologies that frame commercial opportunity and operational complexity. In beverage applications, for example, the beverage category divides into alcoholic and nonalcoholic segments where alcoholic products-further segmented into beer, spirits, and wine-tend to emphasize premium decoration, premium tactile finishes, and tamper-evident features, whereas nonalcoholic products such as carbonated drinks, juices, and bottled water prioritize throughput, label durability, and compatibility with chilling and carbonation requirements. Food applications place a premium on barrier performance and conformability for irregular shapes, while household chemicals require chemical-resistant substrates and robust adhesion under varied storage conditions.
Material choice is a pivotal axis of segmentation. Oriented polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polylactic acid, polyolefin, and polyvinyl chloride each bring trade-offs in clarity, shrink characteristics, recyclability, and compatibility with inks and coatings. These material attributes intersect with container type considerations-bottles, cans, jars, pouches, and tubes-because structural geometry and surface energy affect application temperature, seam integrity, and final appearance. Printing technology further mediates market positioning: digital printing supports short runs and variable data for premium or promotional launches, while flexographic, rotogravure, and screen printing remain cost-effective for high-volume color consistency and specific ink or varnish systems. When these segmentation dimensions are considered together, they create distinct solution profiles that guide supplier selection, capital investment, and design choices across different industry end-users.
A regionally nuanced perspective that explains how regulatory regimes, consumer expectations, and supply chain structures shape shrink sleeve adoption across the Americas Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on demand patterns, regulatory priorities, and the maturity of shrink sleeve supply chains across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, developing consumer preferences and a diversified retail landscape favor label formats that balance visual impact with sustainability messaging; supply chains in this region are also responding to nearshoring trends and the desire for shorter lead times. Transitioning between the retail formats common in North America and the Latin American market requires suppliers to offer flexible order sizes and to manage variable infrastructure realities.
The Europe Middle East & Africa region faces a particularly intricate regulatory environment where circularity mandates and extended producer responsibility programs shape material selection and end-of-life strategies; as a result, mono-material sleeves and compatible inks are gaining traction. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific remains a hub for substrate manufacturing and high-volume production, supported by well-established converter networks and rapid adoption of both digital and conventional printing technologies. However, this region also exhibits a wide range in regulatory and sustainability maturity across individual markets, which creates both export opportunities and compliance complexities for multinational brands. Understanding these regional nuances is essential for aligning sourcing, design, and sustainability initiatives with local market expectations and logistical realities.
Key company-level dynamics showing why integration of print capability material innovation and downstream services defines competitive advantage in the sector
Leading suppliers and converters continue to invest in digital print capability, material innovation, and downstream application services to differentiate offerings and support faster time-to-market. Strategic collaborations between material producers, ink manufacturers, and application equipment vendors are becoming more common as participants seek to deliver validated, end-to-end solutions that reduce qualification time for brand teams. At the same time, companies that have developed robust sustainability roadmaps, including recyclable sleeve constructions and transparent lifecycle claims, are better positioned to win long-term partnerships with major consumer goods companies.
Competitive dynamics are also shaped by service elements such as technical support for line trials, in-market testing for recyclability claims, and the ability to offer localized inventory management or kitting. Firms that can combine creative print capability with predictable lead times and regulatory support capture a premium in conversations with strategic packaging buyers. Moreover, mid-sized converters that specialize in niche substrates or regional production can increase their relevance by offering agility and customization that large global players may not provide at the same scale. In sum, company-level success increasingly depends on integrating technical expertise, supply reliability, and sustainability assurance into a coherent value proposition.
Actionable strategic moves industry leaders can implement now to reduce exposure to trade risk accelerate material transitions and enhance packaging agility and sustainability
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, phased approach to capture advantage: prioritize supplier diversification and scenario planning to mitigate tariff and logistics risks while investing in material trials to align with circularity commitments. Begin by mapping critical inputs and single-source dependencies, then qualify alternative suppliers with an emphasis on regional converters who can reduce lead time and absorb tariff-induced cost volatility. Simultaneously, run focused material and application trials to test mono-material constructions and bio-based polymers for compatibility with existing production lines and recycling streams.
Brands and converters should also accelerate adoption of flexible printing strategies that combine digital for short runs and variable content with conventional presses for high-volume SKUs, thereby unlocking promotional agility without sacrificing unit economics. Invest in cross-functional training that brings marketing, procurement, and packaging engineering into joint decision-making forums to ensure designs are manufacturable and compliant. Finally, formalize supplier scorecards that incorporate sustainability metrics, total cost of ownership, and responsiveness measures, and use those scorecards to drive continuous improvement in sourcing and technical partnerships. These steps will reduce risk, foster innovation, and position organizations to respond quickly to market and policy shifts.
A robust mixed-methods research approach that integrates primary stakeholder interviews technical line trials and scenario analysis to produce practical actionable findings
The research methodology underpinning these insights combines a structured review of industry practices, primary interviews with packaging engineers and procurement leaders, and technical assessments of materials and printing platforms. Data collection prioritized first-hand accounts from brand owners, converters, and material suppliers to capture operational realities such as application constraints, lead-time expectations, and quality control measures. In addition, technical validations and line trial observations informed assessments of material behavior across common container geometries and printing workflows, providing practical grounding for recommendations.
Analytical steps included cross-comparing application requirements by end-use, interrogating the performance attributes of leading substrates and inks, and mapping regional supply chain characteristics to identify friction points. Where appropriate, scenario analysis evaluated the operational implications of tariff changes and supply disruptions, while stakeholder feedback was used to stress-test feasibility and adoption timelines. This mixed-methods approach ensures the findings reflect both strategic patterns and hands-on operational considerations that matter to decision-makers.
A decisive conclusion emphasizing the importance of integrating technical rigor procurement agility and sustainability to maximize shrink sleeve packaging advantages
Shrink sleeve labeling stands out as a packaging option that bridges aesthetic ambition and functional necessity, yet it requires deliberate strategy to realize its full business value. Decision-makers must reconcile design aspirations with material realities, regulatory constraints, and supply chain dynamics while remaining responsive to retail and consumer expectations. The most resilient organizations will be those that invest in supplier diversification, embrace flexible print technologies, and validate material options against circularity and application performance criteria.
Looking ahead, the convergence of material innovation, digital printing, and evolving trade frameworks will continue to shape who succeeds in the shrink sleeve space. Companies that combine technical rigor with commercial agility-using structured procurement practices, rigorous supplier qualification, and targeted investments in application capability-will reduce risk and accelerate time to market. In this environment, packaging strategies that are both creatively compelling and operationally sound will deliver the greatest return for brand teams and supply chain stakeholders alike.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An informed and balanced introduction explaining how shrink sleeve technology unites branding ambitions with technical and regulatory packaging realities
Shrink sleeve labeling sits at the intersection of branding, functionality, and sustainability for product packaging across multiple industries. As consumers increasingly demand premium aesthetics, tactile differentiation, and clear product storytelling, shrink sleeve technology has matured to provide near-full-body decoration, enhanced tamper-evidence, and design freedom not available with traditional labels. Concurrently, advances in substrates, printing fidelity, and application machinery have reduced historical barriers to adoption, enabling more product teams to consider sleeves as a primary packaging decoration strategy rather than a specialty solution.
The packaging ecosystem is responding to these shifts with investments in inline application systems, higher-resolution digital printing capabilities, and coatings that improve recyclability or compostability. At the same time, brand owners face mounting regulatory and voluntary requirements around recyclability and material transparency, which influence material selection and end-of-life strategies. These converging pressures make shrink sleeves both a marketing lever and a technical challenge, demanding closer collaboration between marketing, procurement, and packaging engineers to translate design ambitions into manufacturable, compliant, and cost-effective solutions.
How technological advances and shifting sustainability and retail demands are reshaping shrink sleeve strategies and supplier ecosystems in the packaging industry
Recent years have produced transformative shifts in the shrink sleeve landscape driven by technology, sustainability expectations, and evolving retail dynamics. Digital printing has accelerated a move toward shorter runs and hyper-personalized packaging while maintaining high-resolution imagery that supports premiumization. This technological momentum dovetails with improvements in materials, where bio-based polymers and mono-material constructions are being evaluated to address circularity goals without sacrificing application performance or print quality. Meanwhile, the retail environment is pushing for packaging that stands out on shelf but also complies with increasingly stringent recyclability criteria, creating tension that manufacturers and brands must actively manage.
Supply chain reconfiguration and a renewed focus on nearshoring have also altered how sleeve suppliers and converters design their fulfillment models, with an emphasis on flexibility and responsiveness. Brands are adapting to omnichannel realities by prioritizing packaging that performs equally well in physical stores and direct-to-consumer shipments, which affects seam strength, label adhesion, and substrate selection. Collectively, these changes are transforming shrink sleeves from a niche decorative option into a strategic packaging component that requires integrated planning across design, operations, and sustainability teams.
Anticipate and adapt to the practical supply chain and sourcing consequences of trade measures implemented by the United States in two thousand twenty-five that affect shrink sleeve inputs
Trade policy shifts, including tariff measures enacted by the United States that take effect in the coming year, will influence procurement economics, sourcing choices, and supplier relationships across the shrink sleeve value chain. Tariff adjustments alter landed costs for imported substrates, inks, and finished sleeves, prompting buyers to reassess supplier portfolios, evaluate alternative materials, and explore domestic or regional supply options to reduce exposure. For many organizations, the immediate impact will be an operational reassessment that weighs total landed cost against lead time, quality consistency, and the risk of future policy changes.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs can accelerate longer-term strategic moves such as supplier diversification, qualification of local converters, and investments in in-house application capability. Companies that proactively model tariff scenarios and engage with logistics and procurement partners will navigate these changes with less disruption. Importantly, the policy environment also incentivizes material innovation: brands and converters may prioritize substrates and inks that are more readily available from tariff-favored jurisdictions or that enable more efficient production to offset increased import costs. In this way, trade measures act as a catalyst that reshapes supply networks and accelerates decisions about where and how shrink sleeves are produced and applied.
Deep segmentation-driven insights revealing how application, material, container geometry, and printing technology jointly determine strategy and supplier selection
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated drivers and constraints across applications, materials, container types, and printing technologies that frame commercial opportunity and operational complexity. In beverage applications, for example, the beverage category divides into alcoholic and nonalcoholic segments where alcoholic products-further segmented into beer, spirits, and wine-tend to emphasize premium decoration, premium tactile finishes, and tamper-evident features, whereas nonalcoholic products such as carbonated drinks, juices, and bottled water prioritize throughput, label durability, and compatibility with chilling and carbonation requirements. Food applications place a premium on barrier performance and conformability for irregular shapes, while household chemicals require chemical-resistant substrates and robust adhesion under varied storage conditions.
Material choice is a pivotal axis of segmentation. Oriented polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polylactic acid, polyolefin, and polyvinyl chloride each bring trade-offs in clarity, shrink characteristics, recyclability, and compatibility with inks and coatings. These material attributes intersect with container type considerations-bottles, cans, jars, pouches, and tubes-because structural geometry and surface energy affect application temperature, seam integrity, and final appearance. Printing technology further mediates market positioning: digital printing supports short runs and variable data for premium or promotional launches, while flexographic, rotogravure, and screen printing remain cost-effective for high-volume color consistency and specific ink or varnish systems. When these segmentation dimensions are considered together, they create distinct solution profiles that guide supplier selection, capital investment, and design choices across different industry end-users.
A regionally nuanced perspective that explains how regulatory regimes, consumer expectations, and supply chain structures shape shrink sleeve adoption across the Americas Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on demand patterns, regulatory priorities, and the maturity of shrink sleeve supply chains across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, developing consumer preferences and a diversified retail landscape favor label formats that balance visual impact with sustainability messaging; supply chains in this region are also responding to nearshoring trends and the desire for shorter lead times. Transitioning between the retail formats common in North America and the Latin American market requires suppliers to offer flexible order sizes and to manage variable infrastructure realities.
The Europe Middle East & Africa region faces a particularly intricate regulatory environment where circularity mandates and extended producer responsibility programs shape material selection and end-of-life strategies; as a result, mono-material sleeves and compatible inks are gaining traction. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific remains a hub for substrate manufacturing and high-volume production, supported by well-established converter networks and rapid adoption of both digital and conventional printing technologies. However, this region also exhibits a wide range in regulatory and sustainability maturity across individual markets, which creates both export opportunities and compliance complexities for multinational brands. Understanding these regional nuances is essential for aligning sourcing, design, and sustainability initiatives with local market expectations and logistical realities.
Key company-level dynamics showing why integration of print capability material innovation and downstream services defines competitive advantage in the sector
Leading suppliers and converters continue to invest in digital print capability, material innovation, and downstream application services to differentiate offerings and support faster time-to-market. Strategic collaborations between material producers, ink manufacturers, and application equipment vendors are becoming more common as participants seek to deliver validated, end-to-end solutions that reduce qualification time for brand teams. At the same time, companies that have developed robust sustainability roadmaps, including recyclable sleeve constructions and transparent lifecycle claims, are better positioned to win long-term partnerships with major consumer goods companies.
Competitive dynamics are also shaped by service elements such as technical support for line trials, in-market testing for recyclability claims, and the ability to offer localized inventory management or kitting. Firms that can combine creative print capability with predictable lead times and regulatory support capture a premium in conversations with strategic packaging buyers. Moreover, mid-sized converters that specialize in niche substrates or regional production can increase their relevance by offering agility and customization that large global players may not provide at the same scale. In sum, company-level success increasingly depends on integrating technical expertise, supply reliability, and sustainability assurance into a coherent value proposition.
Actionable strategic moves industry leaders can implement now to reduce exposure to trade risk accelerate material transitions and enhance packaging agility and sustainability
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, phased approach to capture advantage: prioritize supplier diversification and scenario planning to mitigate tariff and logistics risks while investing in material trials to align with circularity commitments. Begin by mapping critical inputs and single-source dependencies, then qualify alternative suppliers with an emphasis on regional converters who can reduce lead time and absorb tariff-induced cost volatility. Simultaneously, run focused material and application trials to test mono-material constructions and bio-based polymers for compatibility with existing production lines and recycling streams.
Brands and converters should also accelerate adoption of flexible printing strategies that combine digital for short runs and variable content with conventional presses for high-volume SKUs, thereby unlocking promotional agility without sacrificing unit economics. Invest in cross-functional training that brings marketing, procurement, and packaging engineering into joint decision-making forums to ensure designs are manufacturable and compliant. Finally, formalize supplier scorecards that incorporate sustainability metrics, total cost of ownership, and responsiveness measures, and use those scorecards to drive continuous improvement in sourcing and technical partnerships. These steps will reduce risk, foster innovation, and position organizations to respond quickly to market and policy shifts.
A robust mixed-methods research approach that integrates primary stakeholder interviews technical line trials and scenario analysis to produce practical actionable findings
The research methodology underpinning these insights combines a structured review of industry practices, primary interviews with packaging engineers and procurement leaders, and technical assessments of materials and printing platforms. Data collection prioritized first-hand accounts from brand owners, converters, and material suppliers to capture operational realities such as application constraints, lead-time expectations, and quality control measures. In addition, technical validations and line trial observations informed assessments of material behavior across common container geometries and printing workflows, providing practical grounding for recommendations.
Analytical steps included cross-comparing application requirements by end-use, interrogating the performance attributes of leading substrates and inks, and mapping regional supply chain characteristics to identify friction points. Where appropriate, scenario analysis evaluated the operational implications of tariff changes and supply disruptions, while stakeholder feedback was used to stress-test feasibility and adoption timelines. This mixed-methods approach ensures the findings reflect both strategic patterns and hands-on operational considerations that matter to decision-makers.
A decisive conclusion emphasizing the importance of integrating technical rigor procurement agility and sustainability to maximize shrink sleeve packaging advantages
Shrink sleeve labeling stands out as a packaging option that bridges aesthetic ambition and functional necessity, yet it requires deliberate strategy to realize its full business value. Decision-makers must reconcile design aspirations with material realities, regulatory constraints, and supply chain dynamics while remaining responsive to retail and consumer expectations. The most resilient organizations will be those that invest in supplier diversification, embrace flexible print technologies, and validate material options against circularity and application performance criteria.
Looking ahead, the convergence of material innovation, digital printing, and evolving trade frameworks will continue to shape who succeeds in the shrink sleeve space. Companies that combine technical rigor with commercial agility-using structured procurement practices, rigorous supplier qualification, and targeted investments in application capability-will reduce risk and accelerate time to market. In this environment, packaging strategies that are both creatively compelling and operationally sound will deliver the greatest return for brand teams and supply chain stakeholders alike.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing adoption of digital inkjet printing for ultra high resolution shrink sleeve designs on short runs
- 5.2. Rising demand for tamper evident shrink sleeve labels with integrated tear strips and security features
- 5.3. Development of compostable and biofilm shrink sleeve materials to support circular economy goals
- 5.4. Growing implementation of smart shrink sleeve labels with NFC and QR codes for interactive consumer engagement
- 5.5. Shift towards water based and UV LED curable coatings to improve sustainability and reduce production downtime
- 5.6. Integration of anti counterfeit technologies such as micro text and holographic foils in shrink sleeve packaging
- 5.7. Expansion of roll fed shrink sleeve application lines with automated inspection and robotic handling systems
- 5.8. Emergence of ultra lightweight thin film shrink sleeve substrates for reduced material usage and lower carbon footprint
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Material
- 8.1. Oriented Polystyrene
- 8.2. Polyethylene Terephthalate
- 8.3. Polylactic Acid
- 8.4. Polyolefin
- 8.5. Polyvinyl Chloride
- 9. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Container Type
- 9.1. Bottle
- 9.2. Can
- 9.3. Jar
- 9.4. Pouch
- 9.5. Tube
- 10. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Printing Technology
- 10.1. Digital
- 10.2. Flexographic
- 10.3. Rotogravure
- 10.4. Screen
- 11. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Application
- 11.1. Beverages
- 11.1.1. Alcoholic
- 11.1.1.1. Beer
- 11.1.1.2. Spirits
- 11.1.1.3. Wine
- 11.1.2. Non Alcoholic
- 11.1.2.1. Carbonated
- 11.1.2.2. Juice
- 11.1.2.3. Water
- 11.2. Food
- 11.3. Household Chemicals
- 11.4. Personal Care
- 11.5. Pharmaceuticals
- 12. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Shrink Sleeve Labels Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. CCL Industries Inc.
- 15.3.2. Avery Dennison Corporation
- 15.3.3. Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
- 15.3.4. Multi-Color Corporation
- 15.3.5. WS Packaging Group, LLC
- 15.3.6. UPM-Kymmene Corporation
- 15.3.7. Berry Global Group, Inc.
- 15.3.8. Fuji Seal International, Inc.
- 15.3.9. Huhtamaki Oyj
- 15.3.10. LINTEC Corporation
- 15.3.11. Amcor plc
- 15.3.12. Klöckner Pentaplast Group
- 15.3.13. WestRock Company
- 15.3.14. Taghleef Industries LLC
- 15.3.15. Uflex Limited
- 15.3.16. Cosmo Films Limited
- 15.3.17. Innovia Films Limited
- 15.3.18. Sleever International Company
- 15.3.19. Fort Dearborn Company
- 15.3.20. Resource Label Group, LLC
- 15.3.21. Yupo Corporation
- 15.3.22. Bonset America Corporation
- 15.3.23. Polysack Flexible Packaging Ltd.
- 15.3.24. Hammer Packaging, LLC
- 15.3.25. Inland Label and Marketing Services, LLC
- 15.3.26. Allen Plastic Industries Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.27. SKC Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.28. Label Impressions, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
