Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market by Vessel Type (Cargo Ships, Passenger Ships), Material Type (Aluminum, Composite Materials, Steel), Ship Parts, Build Type, Customer Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market was valued at USD 166.91 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 175.59 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.43%, reaching USD 254.84 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction to the modern shipbuilding and ship parts ecosystem highlighting technological drivers, regulatory pressures, and strategic imperatives
The contemporary shipbuilding and ship parts arena sits at the intersection of accelerating technological innovation, evolving regulatory regimes, and shifting commercial demand patterns. Over recent years, stakeholders across the value chain-from shipyards and component suppliers to classification societies and shipowners-have had to reconcile traditional production rhythms with demands for greater fuel efficiency, compliance with tightening emissions standards, and a rising expectation for digital enablement. Consequently, strategic decisions increasingly hinge on the ability to integrate engineering excellence with adaptive supply chain practices and cross-disciplinary collaboration.
Transitioning from legacy approaches, industry participants are prioritizing lifecycle thinking that spans design, build, operation, and aftermarket services. This shift elevates the role of modular architecture, flexible propulsion options, and systems-level connectivity that together enable faster adaptation to regulation and market needs. In this environment, executives must balance capital intensity and long development lead times against the need for agile responses to procurement cycles and geopolitical developments. The introduction provides a foundation for understanding these pressures and sets the stage for deeper examination of transformative shifts, tariff implications, segmentation dynamics, and regional variations.
Analysis of the core transformative forces reshaping shipbuilding and ship parts, including decarbonization, digitalization, material innovation, and supply chain diversification
The shipbuilding and ship parts landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by decarbonization imperatives, digitalization, changing trade patterns, and evolving material science. Decarbonization initiatives are prompting a rapid reassessment of propulsion choices and hull optimization strategies, with operators pushing for alternatives that reduce lifecycle emissions while maintaining operational efficiency. In parallel, digital tools such as model-based systems engineering, predictive maintenance algorithms, and advanced simulation are embedding themselves into design and operations, accelerating development cycles and enabling condition-based servicing that reduces downtime and operating risk.
Beyond technology, supply chain architecture is becoming more geographically diversified as firms mitigate concentration risks and seek suppliers with proven compliance and traceability credentials. This reconfiguration interacts with material innovation where aluminum and composite materials are gaining traction for specific vessel segments while steel remains the backbone for heavy-duty applications. Governance and standards are converging internationally but remain differentiated across jurisdictions, which means that shipbuilders and suppliers must design adaptable solutions that can be certified across multiple classification regimes. Together, these forces are reshaping procurement criteria, capital allocation, and competitive strategy across the industry.
Assessment of how 2025 tariff measures have altered procurement strategies, supplier networks, component sourcing, and contract structures across the ship parts value chain
The cumulative impact of United States tariff actions in 2025 introduces a layer of commercial strategy and procurement complexity that affects supplier selection, cost structures, and regional sourcing decisions. Tariff measures have prompted many original equipment manufacturers and shipyards to revisit supplier contracts and to reassess the total landed cost of components, triggering a reassessment of whether to source domestically, nearshore, or rely on alternative supplier networks. As a result, some firms have accelerated localization efforts while others have pursued multi-sourcing strategies to preserve continuity and mitigate escalation of input costs.
Consequently, the tariff environment has influenced investment timelines and contract negotiation tactics in the ship parts sector. Buyers are increasingly including tariff-related clauses in procurement contracts and seeking long-term supply agreements that provide greater price visibility. At the same time, buyers and suppliers are evaluating redesign opportunities that reduce reliance on tariff-affected components through material substitution or integration of domestically produced subassemblies. Taken together, these adjustments demonstrate how trade policy can catalyze strategic realignment across engineering choices, supplier ecosystems, and commercial contracting practices without altering the underlying technical requirements for safety and performance.
In-depth segmentation synthesis revealing how vessel classes, material choices, component categories, build modes, and customer types determine technical requirements and commercial approaches
Segmentation analysis clarifies distinct demand drivers and technical requirements across vessel categories, material choices, component types, build approaches, and customer classes, enabling tailored product and service strategies. For vessel classifications, the market is studied across cargo ships and passenger ships, with the cargo category further disaggregated into bulk carriers, container ships, general cargo ships, and tankers; each vessel group imposes different structural, propulsion, and safety requirements that influence part specifications and lifecycle support models. From a materials perspective, aluminum, composite materials, and steel present divergent trade-offs in terms of weight, corrosion resistance, fabrication complexity, and repairability, which shape design decisions and maintenance regimes throughout the vessel lifecycle.
When evaluating ship parts, the market is studied across control systems, electrical systems, hull components, propulsion systems, and safety systems, and within propulsion the analysis drills into engines, propellers, and thrusters; this component-level lens underscores how interoperability, redundancy, and certification pathways differ between systems and inform aftermarket service propositions. Build type segmentation examines new builds versus retrofit and refurbishment, highlighting how retrofit projects often prioritize integration with legacy systems and minimizing downtime, whereas new builds allow for system optimization and modular design from the outset. Finally, customer type segmentation covers corporate, government, and private clients, each exhibiting distinct procurement cycles, regulatory constraints, and financing approaches that influence contract terms, technology adoption rates, and aftermarket service demand. Altogether, this multifaceted segmentation enables stakeholders to map capability gaps, prioritize R&D investments, and configure commercial models that meet the nuanced needs of each end-user group.
Key regional perspectives on how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape supply chains, regulatory priorities, and demand for new builds versus retrofits
Regional dynamics continue to shape strategic priorities, investment flows, and competitive positioning across the shipbuilding and ship parts ecosystem. In the Americas, stakeholders focus on modernization of fleets, regulatory compliance for emissions, and leveraging regional manufacturing capabilities to support nearshore procurement strategies. The emphasis on retrofit and refurbishment has strengthened in certain market segments as operators seek to extend asset life and improve environmental performance without incurring the capital intensity of new builds. This regional orientation supports strategic partnerships between local shipyards and suppliers to accelerate turnaround for maintenance and upgrades.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, diversity across markets creates differentiated demand drivers, with European operators often leading in decarbonization standards and digital certification requirements, while Middle Eastern shipowners emphasize large-scale tanker and offshore support vessels. African maritime development programs are expanding coastal and inland waterway capabilities, which increases demand for adaptable hulls and reliable propulsion solutions. Across this region, interoperability with international standards remains a priority, and suppliers must navigate varying regulatory regimes while offering scalable solutions.
In the Asia-Pacific region, dense shipbuilding capacity and established tiered supplier networks enable rapid prototyping and volume manufacturing, particularly for container ships and tankers. Asia-Pacific markets exhibit strong activity in both new builds and retrofit services, supported by an extensive ecosystem of component manufacturers and specialized engineering firms. The convergence of production scale, proximity to supply chain nodes, and growing adoption of alternative propulsion concepts positions the region as a focal point for industrial collaboration and technology diffusion. Collectively, these regional differences underscore the importance of tailored go-to-market approaches, accredited certification strategies, and supply chain resilience planning.
Corporate strategies observed among industry leaders that combine modular engineering, aftermarket services, supply chain partnerships, and commercial innovation to sustain competitive advantage
Leading companies across the shipbuilding and ship parts domain are responding to competitive pressures by pursuing strategies that blend technological differentiation with operational resilience. Industry leaders are investing in modular design and digital engineering platforms to shorten development cycles and support scalable production, while also cultivating specialized aftermarket capabilities that generate recurring revenue through maintenance, upgrades, and lifecycle services. Partnerships between component manufacturers and systems integrators are becoming more common, enabling bundled offerings that simplify certification and reduce integration risk for shipowners.
At the same time, firms are forging supply chain partnerships to secure critical inputs and to develop secondary sourcing arrangements that enhance responsiveness to demand fluctuation and policy shifts. Strategic M&A and joint ventures serve to consolidate capabilities in propulsion technologies, advanced materials, and digital platforms, thereby accelerating access to complementary know-how. In customer engagement, companies increasingly emphasize outcome-based contracts that align payments with vessel performance, fuel efficiency, or downtime reduction targets. As a result, the most successful companies balance engineering excellence with commercial creativity, creating propositions that address both immediate technical requirements and longer-term operational objectives.
Actionable recommendations for shipyards, suppliers, and operators to enhance resilience, accelerate decarbonization, and capture value through modular design and strategic sourcing
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions to navigate ongoing disruption while capturing emerging opportunities. First, prioritize modular and open-architecture design principles to allow faster integration of new propulsion options and digital subsystems; this reduces upgrade complexity and preserves asset value. Second, accelerate investments in condition-based monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities to shift service relationships from reactive repair to proactive reliability management, thereby reducing lifecycle operating costs and improving uptime.
Third, reassess supplier networks to establish a mix of local, nearshore, and global partners that can be activated according to risk profiles and tariff dynamics. This balanced sourcing approach enhances resilience and preserves competitive lead times. Fourth, embed material strategy reviews into product roadmaps to evaluate where aluminum or composites can deliver dimensional advantages, weight reduction, or improved corrosion resistance relative to steel, particularly for vessel types with stringent speed or payload requirements. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and classification societies to pilot alternative fuels, energy storage solutions, and digital certification workflows so that certification pathways mature in lockstep with technological innovation. Implementing these measures will enable companies to reduce exposure to trade volatility, accelerate adoption of low-emission solutions, and create higher-value service relationships with customers.
Transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, technical literature synthesis, systems mapping, and cross-validation to produce robust actionable insights
The research underpinning this analysis draws from a rigorous blend of primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature review, and triangulated validation to ensure insights are both actionable and robust. Primary inputs include structured interviews and workshops with shipbuilders, component manufacturers, classification experts, and operators across cargo and passenger vessel segments, complemented by discussions with materials scientists and propulsion system integrators. These engagements provide qualitative depth on procurement behavior, certification challenges, and retrofit considerations while capturing real-world operational trade-offs.
Secondary sources encompass peer-reviewed engineering literature, publicly available regulatory documents, technical standards from classification bodies, and case studies of recent retrofit and new-build projects. Data from these sources were synthesized with primary findings to identify recurring patterns and to validate inferred strategic implications. Analytical techniques include systems-level mapping of value chain interactions, scenario analysis of supply chain reactions to policy changes, and comparative evaluation of material and propulsion options. Throughout the methodology, cross-validation ensured that conclusions reflect convergent evidence rather than single-source assumptions, enhancing the reliability of recommendations for decision-makers.
Concise conclusion synthesizing implications for strategy, integration of multidisciplinary capabilities, and the pathway to resilient and sustainable competitive advantage
In summary, the shipbuilding and ship parts sector is navigating a period of substantive transformation driven by environmental mandates, digital solutions, material innovations, and trade policy shifts. These dynamics are reshaping procurement priorities and prompting both incremental and architectural changes in how vessels are designed, constructed, and maintained. Stakeholders that align engineering strategies with adaptive sourcing, modular system design, and outcome-oriented commercial models will be better positioned to manage regulatory complexity and capture ongoing value from aftermarket services.
Looking ahead, success will depend on the capacity to integrate multidisciplinary expertise-materials science, systems engineering, digital analytics, and regulatory affairs-into cohesive product and service offerings. Firms that embrace this integrative approach can reduce lifecycle risk, extend asset utility through targeted retrofits, and deliver differentiated performance outcomes for customers across corporate, government, and private segments. The conclusion underscores the need for deliberate, coordinated action across the value chain to realize both operational resilience and sustainable competitive advantage.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction to the modern shipbuilding and ship parts ecosystem highlighting technological drivers, regulatory pressures, and strategic imperatives
The contemporary shipbuilding and ship parts arena sits at the intersection of accelerating technological innovation, evolving regulatory regimes, and shifting commercial demand patterns. Over recent years, stakeholders across the value chain-from shipyards and component suppliers to classification societies and shipowners-have had to reconcile traditional production rhythms with demands for greater fuel efficiency, compliance with tightening emissions standards, and a rising expectation for digital enablement. Consequently, strategic decisions increasingly hinge on the ability to integrate engineering excellence with adaptive supply chain practices and cross-disciplinary collaboration.
Transitioning from legacy approaches, industry participants are prioritizing lifecycle thinking that spans design, build, operation, and aftermarket services. This shift elevates the role of modular architecture, flexible propulsion options, and systems-level connectivity that together enable faster adaptation to regulation and market needs. In this environment, executives must balance capital intensity and long development lead times against the need for agile responses to procurement cycles and geopolitical developments. The introduction provides a foundation for understanding these pressures and sets the stage for deeper examination of transformative shifts, tariff implications, segmentation dynamics, and regional variations.
Analysis of the core transformative forces reshaping shipbuilding and ship parts, including decarbonization, digitalization, material innovation, and supply chain diversification
The shipbuilding and ship parts landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by decarbonization imperatives, digitalization, changing trade patterns, and evolving material science. Decarbonization initiatives are prompting a rapid reassessment of propulsion choices and hull optimization strategies, with operators pushing for alternatives that reduce lifecycle emissions while maintaining operational efficiency. In parallel, digital tools such as model-based systems engineering, predictive maintenance algorithms, and advanced simulation are embedding themselves into design and operations, accelerating development cycles and enabling condition-based servicing that reduces downtime and operating risk.
Beyond technology, supply chain architecture is becoming more geographically diversified as firms mitigate concentration risks and seek suppliers with proven compliance and traceability credentials. This reconfiguration interacts with material innovation where aluminum and composite materials are gaining traction for specific vessel segments while steel remains the backbone for heavy-duty applications. Governance and standards are converging internationally but remain differentiated across jurisdictions, which means that shipbuilders and suppliers must design adaptable solutions that can be certified across multiple classification regimes. Together, these forces are reshaping procurement criteria, capital allocation, and competitive strategy across the industry.
Assessment of how 2025 tariff measures have altered procurement strategies, supplier networks, component sourcing, and contract structures across the ship parts value chain
The cumulative impact of United States tariff actions in 2025 introduces a layer of commercial strategy and procurement complexity that affects supplier selection, cost structures, and regional sourcing decisions. Tariff measures have prompted many original equipment manufacturers and shipyards to revisit supplier contracts and to reassess the total landed cost of components, triggering a reassessment of whether to source domestically, nearshore, or rely on alternative supplier networks. As a result, some firms have accelerated localization efforts while others have pursued multi-sourcing strategies to preserve continuity and mitigate escalation of input costs.
Consequently, the tariff environment has influenced investment timelines and contract negotiation tactics in the ship parts sector. Buyers are increasingly including tariff-related clauses in procurement contracts and seeking long-term supply agreements that provide greater price visibility. At the same time, buyers and suppliers are evaluating redesign opportunities that reduce reliance on tariff-affected components through material substitution or integration of domestically produced subassemblies. Taken together, these adjustments demonstrate how trade policy can catalyze strategic realignment across engineering choices, supplier ecosystems, and commercial contracting practices without altering the underlying technical requirements for safety and performance.
In-depth segmentation synthesis revealing how vessel classes, material choices, component categories, build modes, and customer types determine technical requirements and commercial approaches
Segmentation analysis clarifies distinct demand drivers and technical requirements across vessel categories, material choices, component types, build approaches, and customer classes, enabling tailored product and service strategies. For vessel classifications, the market is studied across cargo ships and passenger ships, with the cargo category further disaggregated into bulk carriers, container ships, general cargo ships, and tankers; each vessel group imposes different structural, propulsion, and safety requirements that influence part specifications and lifecycle support models. From a materials perspective, aluminum, composite materials, and steel present divergent trade-offs in terms of weight, corrosion resistance, fabrication complexity, and repairability, which shape design decisions and maintenance regimes throughout the vessel lifecycle.
When evaluating ship parts, the market is studied across control systems, electrical systems, hull components, propulsion systems, and safety systems, and within propulsion the analysis drills into engines, propellers, and thrusters; this component-level lens underscores how interoperability, redundancy, and certification pathways differ between systems and inform aftermarket service propositions. Build type segmentation examines new builds versus retrofit and refurbishment, highlighting how retrofit projects often prioritize integration with legacy systems and minimizing downtime, whereas new builds allow for system optimization and modular design from the outset. Finally, customer type segmentation covers corporate, government, and private clients, each exhibiting distinct procurement cycles, regulatory constraints, and financing approaches that influence contract terms, technology adoption rates, and aftermarket service demand. Altogether, this multifaceted segmentation enables stakeholders to map capability gaps, prioritize R&D investments, and configure commercial models that meet the nuanced needs of each end-user group.
Key regional perspectives on how the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape supply chains, regulatory priorities, and demand for new builds versus retrofits
Regional dynamics continue to shape strategic priorities, investment flows, and competitive positioning across the shipbuilding and ship parts ecosystem. In the Americas, stakeholders focus on modernization of fleets, regulatory compliance for emissions, and leveraging regional manufacturing capabilities to support nearshore procurement strategies. The emphasis on retrofit and refurbishment has strengthened in certain market segments as operators seek to extend asset life and improve environmental performance without incurring the capital intensity of new builds. This regional orientation supports strategic partnerships between local shipyards and suppliers to accelerate turnaround for maintenance and upgrades.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, diversity across markets creates differentiated demand drivers, with European operators often leading in decarbonization standards and digital certification requirements, while Middle Eastern shipowners emphasize large-scale tanker and offshore support vessels. African maritime development programs are expanding coastal and inland waterway capabilities, which increases demand for adaptable hulls and reliable propulsion solutions. Across this region, interoperability with international standards remains a priority, and suppliers must navigate varying regulatory regimes while offering scalable solutions.
In the Asia-Pacific region, dense shipbuilding capacity and established tiered supplier networks enable rapid prototyping and volume manufacturing, particularly for container ships and tankers. Asia-Pacific markets exhibit strong activity in both new builds and retrofit services, supported by an extensive ecosystem of component manufacturers and specialized engineering firms. The convergence of production scale, proximity to supply chain nodes, and growing adoption of alternative propulsion concepts positions the region as a focal point for industrial collaboration and technology diffusion. Collectively, these regional differences underscore the importance of tailored go-to-market approaches, accredited certification strategies, and supply chain resilience planning.
Corporate strategies observed among industry leaders that combine modular engineering, aftermarket services, supply chain partnerships, and commercial innovation to sustain competitive advantage
Leading companies across the shipbuilding and ship parts domain are responding to competitive pressures by pursuing strategies that blend technological differentiation with operational resilience. Industry leaders are investing in modular design and digital engineering platforms to shorten development cycles and support scalable production, while also cultivating specialized aftermarket capabilities that generate recurring revenue through maintenance, upgrades, and lifecycle services. Partnerships between component manufacturers and systems integrators are becoming more common, enabling bundled offerings that simplify certification and reduce integration risk for shipowners.
At the same time, firms are forging supply chain partnerships to secure critical inputs and to develop secondary sourcing arrangements that enhance responsiveness to demand fluctuation and policy shifts. Strategic M&A and joint ventures serve to consolidate capabilities in propulsion technologies, advanced materials, and digital platforms, thereby accelerating access to complementary know-how. In customer engagement, companies increasingly emphasize outcome-based contracts that align payments with vessel performance, fuel efficiency, or downtime reduction targets. As a result, the most successful companies balance engineering excellence with commercial creativity, creating propositions that address both immediate technical requirements and longer-term operational objectives.
Actionable recommendations for shipyards, suppliers, and operators to enhance resilience, accelerate decarbonization, and capture value through modular design and strategic sourcing
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions to navigate ongoing disruption while capturing emerging opportunities. First, prioritize modular and open-architecture design principles to allow faster integration of new propulsion options and digital subsystems; this reduces upgrade complexity and preserves asset value. Second, accelerate investments in condition-based monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities to shift service relationships from reactive repair to proactive reliability management, thereby reducing lifecycle operating costs and improving uptime.
Third, reassess supplier networks to establish a mix of local, nearshore, and global partners that can be activated according to risk profiles and tariff dynamics. This balanced sourcing approach enhances resilience and preserves competitive lead times. Fourth, embed material strategy reviews into product roadmaps to evaluate where aluminum or composites can deliver dimensional advantages, weight reduction, or improved corrosion resistance relative to steel, particularly for vessel types with stringent speed or payload requirements. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and classification societies to pilot alternative fuels, energy storage solutions, and digital certification workflows so that certification pathways mature in lockstep with technological innovation. Implementing these measures will enable companies to reduce exposure to trade volatility, accelerate adoption of low-emission solutions, and create higher-value service relationships with customers.
Transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, technical literature synthesis, systems mapping, and cross-validation to produce robust actionable insights
The research underpinning this analysis draws from a rigorous blend of primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature review, and triangulated validation to ensure insights are both actionable and robust. Primary inputs include structured interviews and workshops with shipbuilders, component manufacturers, classification experts, and operators across cargo and passenger vessel segments, complemented by discussions with materials scientists and propulsion system integrators. These engagements provide qualitative depth on procurement behavior, certification challenges, and retrofit considerations while capturing real-world operational trade-offs.
Secondary sources encompass peer-reviewed engineering literature, publicly available regulatory documents, technical standards from classification bodies, and case studies of recent retrofit and new-build projects. Data from these sources were synthesized with primary findings to identify recurring patterns and to validate inferred strategic implications. Analytical techniques include systems-level mapping of value chain interactions, scenario analysis of supply chain reactions to policy changes, and comparative evaluation of material and propulsion options. Throughout the methodology, cross-validation ensured that conclusions reflect convergent evidence rather than single-source assumptions, enhancing the reliability of recommendations for decision-makers.
Concise conclusion synthesizing implications for strategy, integration of multidisciplinary capabilities, and the pathway to resilient and sustainable competitive advantage
In summary, the shipbuilding and ship parts sector is navigating a period of substantive transformation driven by environmental mandates, digital solutions, material innovations, and trade policy shifts. These dynamics are reshaping procurement priorities and prompting both incremental and architectural changes in how vessels are designed, constructed, and maintained. Stakeholders that align engineering strategies with adaptive sourcing, modular system design, and outcome-oriented commercial models will be better positioned to manage regulatory complexity and capture ongoing value from aftermarket services.
Looking ahead, success will depend on the capacity to integrate multidisciplinary expertise-materials science, systems engineering, digital analytics, and regulatory affairs-into cohesive product and service offerings. Firms that embrace this integrative approach can reduce lifecycle risk, extend asset utility through targeted retrofits, and deliver differentiated performance outcomes for customers across corporate, government, and private segments. The conclusion underscores the need for deliberate, coordinated action across the value chain to realize both operational resilience and sustainable competitive advantage.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of digital twin technology for real-time optimization of ship design and operations
- 5.2. Integration of advanced additive manufacturing processes for on-demand spare parts production at sea
- 5.3. Implementation of green hydrogen propulsion systems to reduce carbon emissions in commercial fleets
- 5.4. Deployment of autonomous navigation and robotics systems to enhance shipyard productivity and safety
- 5.5. Development of modular ship construction methods to accelerate building timelines and cost efficiency
- 5.6. Investment in cybersecurity measures to protect increasingly connected onboard control and monitoring systems
- 5.7. Retrofitting existing vessels with carbon capture and storage solutions to meet stringent emission regulations
- 5.8. Utilization of blockchain-enabled supply chain platforms for transparent tracking of marine component provenance
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Vessel Type
- 8.1. Cargo Ships
- 8.1.1. Bulk Carriers
- 8.1.2. Container Ships
- 8.1.3. General Cargo Ships
- 8.1.4. Tankers
- 8.2. Passenger Ships
- 9. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Material Type
- 9.1. Aluminum
- 9.2. Composite Materials
- 9.3. Steel
- 10. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Ship Parts
- 10.1. Control Systems
- 10.2. Electrical Systems
- 10.3. Hull
- 10.4. Propulsion Systems
- 10.4.1. Engines
- 10.4.2. Propellers
- 10.4.3. Thrusters
- 10.5. Safety Systems
- 11. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Build Type
- 11.1. New Builds
- 11.2. Retrofit & Refurbishment
- 12. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Customer Type
- 12.1. Corporate
- 12.2. Government
- 12.3. Private
- 13. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Shipbuilding & Ship Parts Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Austal Limited
- 16.3.2. China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation
- 16.3.3. China State Shipbuilding Corporation
- 16.3.4. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.5. Damen Shipyards Group N.V.
- 16.3.6. FINCANTIERI S.p.A.
- 16.3.7. General Dynamics NASSCO
- 16.3.8. Gulf Craft Inc.
- 16.3.9. Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.11. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Imabari Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.13. K Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 16.3.15. Master Boat Builders, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Meyer Werft GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.17. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 16.3.18. Naval Group
- 16.3.19. Oshima Shipbuilding Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Rodriguez Shipbuilding, Inc.
- 16.3.21. Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 16.3.23. thyssenkrupp AG
- 16.3.24. United Shipbuilding Corporation
- 16.3.25. Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
