Security & Surveillance Radar Market by Platform (Airborne, Ground Based, Naval), Frequency (C Band, Ka Band, Ku Band), Technology, Mounting, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Security & Surveillance Radar Market was valued at USD 9.32 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 9.69 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.50%, reaching USD 15.43 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive introduction exploring how converging technological advances and operational demands are redefining radar roles across civil and defense surveillance ecosystems
Security and surveillance radar systems are at a pivotal inflection point, where rapid technology maturation converges with evolving operational demands across civil and defense environments. This introduction establishes a clear context for decision-makers by framing the core drivers-advancements in signal processing, miniaturization, and spectral management-that are reshaping capabilities for detection, tracking, and classification. It situates radar not merely as a sensor modality but as a critical node within distributed situational awareness architectures, where data fusion, persistent surveillance, and resilient communications determine operational effectiveness.
Understanding the nuanced interplay between hardware innovation and system-level integration is essential. As radar modalities move from legacy installations to more agile, software-defined platforms, stakeholders must reconcile requirements for performance, regulatory compliance, and interoperability. This section highlights the imperative for cross-domain thinking, where airborne, ground based, naval, and space based deployments each impose distinct constraints and opportunities. With these foundations, leaders can better prioritize investments that deliver measurable improvements in threat visibility, response time, and mission assurance.
Critical transformative shifts in sensor architecture, signal processing, spectrum management, and sustainment that are redefining radar capabilities and operational concepts
The landscape for security and surveillance radar is being transformed by several convergent shifts that change how systems are designed, deployed, and sustained. First, sensor architectures are evolving from single-function hardware toward software-defined, multi-mission platforms that enable rapid reconfiguration and feature upgrades through software patches and modular hardware blocks. This evolution reduces lifecycle friction and supports incremental capability insertion while preserving investment protection.
Second, signal processing and machine learning have matured to the point where real-time classification and predictive analytics are routinely integrated at the sensor edge, improving detection in cluttered and congested environments. Third, spectrum dynamics and electromagnetic environment complexity have elevated the need for agile frequency use and sophisticated interference mitigation techniques, prompting renewed focus on waveform diversity and adaptive beamforming. Fourth, logistics and sustainment models are adapting to accommodate mobile and rapidly deployable mounts, including drone mounted solutions and other small-form-factor systems. Finally, regulatory frameworks and supply chain geopolitics are influencing procurement strategies and cross-border collaboration, requiring leaders to balance sovereign capabilities with commercial innovation. Together, these shifts demand a strategic reappraisal of technology roadmaps and operational concepts to maintain relevance amid accelerating change.
How evolving tariff landscapes and trade policy pressures are reshaping sourcing strategies, supplier diversification, and design-for-supply resilience across radar programs
Recent trade policy actions and tariff adjustments in the United States have introduced an additional layer of complexity for procurement and supply chain planning across the radar ecosystem. Organizations that rely on cross-border sourcing for components such as high-performance semiconductors, RF front ends, and specialized mechanical assemblies now face the prospect of altered sourcing economics and lead-time variability. These dynamics can accelerate localization efforts for sensitive subsystems, influence long-term supplier selection, and prompt the re-evaluation of vendor qualification frameworks to ensure continuity of supply.
The cumulative impact of tariff shifts is not uniform across system types. High-complexity platforms that incorporate advanced RF components and phased array modules are more sensitive to parts-level cost and availability fluctuations, while lower-complexity fixed installations or handheld units may be less exposed but still affected by logistics and compliance overhead. In response, program managers are increasingly prioritizing supplier diversification, dual-sourcing strategies, and long-form agreements with key vendors to de-risk critical paths. Concurrently, there is greater emphasis on design-for-supply resilience, where interchangeability, off-the-shelf modularity, and the capacity to redesign around contested components become strategic design criteria. These responses together form a pragmatic blueprint for mitigating tariff-driven disruption while preserving capability delivery timelines.
In-depth segmentation analysis linking platform constraints, frequency trade-offs, signal technologies, mounting options, and diverse application requirements to practical procurement decisions
A granular look at segmentation reveals distinct demand patterns and technology choices across platforms, frequency allocations, signal architectures, mounting approaches, and end-use applications. Platform considerations influence acquisition priorities: airborne systems demand strict SWaP constraints and often prioritize compact, high-bandwidth solutions for real-time data links, while ground based and naval systems emphasize durability, range, and integration into larger command-and-control networks; space based radar introduces unique thermal and radiation-hardening requirements that drive component selection. Frequency selection is equally consequential, with C Band, Ka Band, Ku Band, L Band, S Band, and X Band each presenting trade-offs in range, resolution, atmospheric susceptibility, and licensing regimes; system designers routinely balance these attributes to meet mission-specific detection and classification objectives.
Technology choices shape performance envelopes. Doppler and pulse doppler techniques remain foundational for velocity discrimination, whereas frequency modulated continuous wave solutions provide superior close-range resolution for certain surveillance tasks; phased array architectures are increasingly favored for agile beam steering and multi-target tracking. Mounting modalities determine deployment flexibility: drone mounted sensors enable persistent, low-altitude coverage and quick re-tasking, fixed and mobile mounts support sustained surveillance corridors, and handheld units serve niche inspection and tactical roles. Application-driven requirements ultimately synthesize these elements-airport surveillance, coastal surveillance, homeland security with specific sub-focus areas such as border security and critical infrastructure protection, maritime navigation, perimeter surveillance, and wildlife monitoring each demand tailored sensor-performance and integration approaches. Understanding how these segmentation vectors intersect allows procurement and engineering teams to optimize trade-offs between capability, cost, and speed to operational utility.
Key regional perspectives on procurement trends, regulatory nuance, and industrial collaboration shaping radar deployment across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on technology adoption, procurement timelines, and industrial collaboration models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, legacy defense programs often catalyze innovation in radar subsystems, with a strong emphasis on integration into broader networked architectures and close collaboration between prime integrators and specialized component suppliers. Regulatory and spectrum allocation frameworks in this region tend to evolve in step with operational needs, which can accelerate deployment of novel waveforms and adaptive techniques.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where multinational programs, sovereign capability initiatives, and varying regulatory regimes interact. This region is characterized by a mix of legacy coastal and port surveillance requirements alongside investments in border security and critical infrastructure protection, driving demand for interoperable systems and standards-based integration. In Asia-Pacific, rapid infrastructure development, increased maritime traffic, and a growing focus on aerial domain awareness are driving demand for scalable, modular radar solutions suitable for both naval and coastal applications. Across all regions, supply chain localization, regulatory compliance, and partnerships with local industry players are recurring themes that guide go-to-market strategies and long-term sustainment planning.
Insight into competitive dynamics and collaborative ecosystems that influence procurement strategies, supplier portfolios, and phased capability insertion for radar programs
Competitive dynamics among established defense primes and specialized radar technology firms continue to shape capability trajectories and procurement frameworks. Leading system integrators are investing in digital engineering practices, accelerated prototyping, and interoperability toolchains to support multi-domain operations. These integrators often partner with focused technology suppliers that specialize in advanced RF components, solid-state transmitters, low-noise receivers, and ruggedized mechanically scanned arrays to reduce time-to-mission for new programs. At the same time, innovative smaller firms are leveraging software-defined radio architectures, commercial semiconductor advances, and machine learning to deliver niche solutions for specific surveillance tasks.
The ecosystem is also witnessing expanded collaboration between civil and defense stakeholders, enabling cross-pollination of ideas in areas such as persistent border surveillance and critical infrastructure protection. Strategic partnerships are frequently formed to combine scale and integration expertise with cutting-edge sensor design, enabling larger programs to adopt emerging capabilities with reduced technical risk. For procurement officers, understanding these partner ecosystems is essential to construct balanced supplier portfolios that combine proven scale with innovation velocity. Tactically, this often means contracting frameworks that allow for phased capability insertion, supplier performance metrics, and clear interoperability baselines to maintain program momentum while integrating new technologies.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to synchronize modular design, advanced processing, supply resilience, and regional partnerships to sustain radar operational advantage
Industry leaders must act proactively to align strategy, R&D investment, and procurement practices with the accelerating pace of technological and geopolitical change. First, adopt a modular architecture approach that prioritizes interchangeable subsystems, software-defined radios, and open integration standards to reduce the cost and time of capability upgrades while enabling supplier flexibility. Second, invest in advanced signal processing and edge classification capabilities to improve detection confidence in dense and contested electromagnetic environments, pairing algorithmic innovation with appropriate hardware acceleration to ensure real-time performance.
Third, build robust supplier risk management programs that include dual-sourcing, long-lead component inventory strategies, and design-for-supply alternatives to mitigate trade-policy and tariff disruptions. Fourth, pursue regional partnerships and local integration capabilities where regulations or operational realities favor sovereign or near-sovereign supply chains, while maintaining access to global innovation through strategic alliances. Fifth, prioritize lifecycle sustainment planning that accounts for software maintenance, security patching, and upgrade pathways to preserve operational availability. Taken together, these recommendations enable organizations to balance innovation with resilience, ensuring systems deliver sustained operational value while remaining responsive to emerging threats and policy shifts.
Rigorous multi-method research methodology combining primary expert engagement, technical synthesis, and scenario validation to produce actionable radar insights for decision-makers
The research approach underpinning this analysis blends primary engagement, secondary-source synthesis, and structured expert validation to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary engagement included interviews and structured conversations with program managers, systems engineers, procurement leads, and technology suppliers to capture first-hand perspectives on capability requirements, integration challenges, and supply chain realities. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with secondary-source technical literature, standards documentation, regulatory texts, and public-domain patent activity to establish technical baselines and identify innovation trajectories.
Analytical methods emphasized cross-segmentation synthesis-mapping platform constraints to frequency trade-offs, signal-processing techniques, mounting modalities, and end-use applications-to generate coherent capability profiles and procurement implications. Supply chain and policy impacts were assessed through scenario analysis that considered tariff disruption, supplier concentration, and regional industrial policy. Findings were validated through peer review with subject matter experts to surface potential blind spots and ensure practical relevance for decision-makers. This multi-method approach produces a defensible, practice-oriented set of insights suitable for both technical and executive audiences.
Conclusive synthesis emphasizing the need for modularity, edge analytics, and resilient supply strategies to sustain radar capability in a complex global environment
In conclusion, the security and surveillance radar domain is transitioning into an era defined by software-centric architectures, advanced signal processing, and supply chain realism. Organizations that embrace modularity, invest in edge analytics, and proactively manage supplier risk will be better positioned to meet evolving operational requirements and regulatory constraints. The confluence of technological advances-ranging from phased array agility to machine learning–driven classification-creates significant operational upside, but realizing that upside requires disciplined integration practices, lifecycle planning, and strategic partnerships that balance innovation with resilience.
Leaders must also remain attentive to policy and trade developments that can influence component availability and program economics. By aligning procurement strategies with flexible design philosophies and robust supplier ecosystems, stakeholders can accelerate capability deployment while safeguarding long-term sustainment. This balanced approach ensures that radar systems remain a dependable and adaptable cornerstone of homeland security, maritime safety, critical infrastructure protection, and broader situational awareness objectives in an increasingly complex security environment.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive introduction exploring how converging technological advances and operational demands are redefining radar roles across civil and defense surveillance ecosystems
Security and surveillance radar systems are at a pivotal inflection point, where rapid technology maturation converges with evolving operational demands across civil and defense environments. This introduction establishes a clear context for decision-makers by framing the core drivers-advancements in signal processing, miniaturization, and spectral management-that are reshaping capabilities for detection, tracking, and classification. It situates radar not merely as a sensor modality but as a critical node within distributed situational awareness architectures, where data fusion, persistent surveillance, and resilient communications determine operational effectiveness.
Understanding the nuanced interplay between hardware innovation and system-level integration is essential. As radar modalities move from legacy installations to more agile, software-defined platforms, stakeholders must reconcile requirements for performance, regulatory compliance, and interoperability. This section highlights the imperative for cross-domain thinking, where airborne, ground based, naval, and space based deployments each impose distinct constraints and opportunities. With these foundations, leaders can better prioritize investments that deliver measurable improvements in threat visibility, response time, and mission assurance.
Critical transformative shifts in sensor architecture, signal processing, spectrum management, and sustainment that are redefining radar capabilities and operational concepts
The landscape for security and surveillance radar is being transformed by several convergent shifts that change how systems are designed, deployed, and sustained. First, sensor architectures are evolving from single-function hardware toward software-defined, multi-mission platforms that enable rapid reconfiguration and feature upgrades through software patches and modular hardware blocks. This evolution reduces lifecycle friction and supports incremental capability insertion while preserving investment protection.
Second, signal processing and machine learning have matured to the point where real-time classification and predictive analytics are routinely integrated at the sensor edge, improving detection in cluttered and congested environments. Third, spectrum dynamics and electromagnetic environment complexity have elevated the need for agile frequency use and sophisticated interference mitigation techniques, prompting renewed focus on waveform diversity and adaptive beamforming. Fourth, logistics and sustainment models are adapting to accommodate mobile and rapidly deployable mounts, including drone mounted solutions and other small-form-factor systems. Finally, regulatory frameworks and supply chain geopolitics are influencing procurement strategies and cross-border collaboration, requiring leaders to balance sovereign capabilities with commercial innovation. Together, these shifts demand a strategic reappraisal of technology roadmaps and operational concepts to maintain relevance amid accelerating change.
How evolving tariff landscapes and trade policy pressures are reshaping sourcing strategies, supplier diversification, and design-for-supply resilience across radar programs
Recent trade policy actions and tariff adjustments in the United States have introduced an additional layer of complexity for procurement and supply chain planning across the radar ecosystem. Organizations that rely on cross-border sourcing for components such as high-performance semiconductors, RF front ends, and specialized mechanical assemblies now face the prospect of altered sourcing economics and lead-time variability. These dynamics can accelerate localization efforts for sensitive subsystems, influence long-term supplier selection, and prompt the re-evaluation of vendor qualification frameworks to ensure continuity of supply.
The cumulative impact of tariff shifts is not uniform across system types. High-complexity platforms that incorporate advanced RF components and phased array modules are more sensitive to parts-level cost and availability fluctuations, while lower-complexity fixed installations or handheld units may be less exposed but still affected by logistics and compliance overhead. In response, program managers are increasingly prioritizing supplier diversification, dual-sourcing strategies, and long-form agreements with key vendors to de-risk critical paths. Concurrently, there is greater emphasis on design-for-supply resilience, where interchangeability, off-the-shelf modularity, and the capacity to redesign around contested components become strategic design criteria. These responses together form a pragmatic blueprint for mitigating tariff-driven disruption while preserving capability delivery timelines.
In-depth segmentation analysis linking platform constraints, frequency trade-offs, signal technologies, mounting options, and diverse application requirements to practical procurement decisions
A granular look at segmentation reveals distinct demand patterns and technology choices across platforms, frequency allocations, signal architectures, mounting approaches, and end-use applications. Platform considerations influence acquisition priorities: airborne systems demand strict SWaP constraints and often prioritize compact, high-bandwidth solutions for real-time data links, while ground based and naval systems emphasize durability, range, and integration into larger command-and-control networks; space based radar introduces unique thermal and radiation-hardening requirements that drive component selection. Frequency selection is equally consequential, with C Band, Ka Band, Ku Band, L Band, S Band, and X Band each presenting trade-offs in range, resolution, atmospheric susceptibility, and licensing regimes; system designers routinely balance these attributes to meet mission-specific detection and classification objectives.
Technology choices shape performance envelopes. Doppler and pulse doppler techniques remain foundational for velocity discrimination, whereas frequency modulated continuous wave solutions provide superior close-range resolution for certain surveillance tasks; phased array architectures are increasingly favored for agile beam steering and multi-target tracking. Mounting modalities determine deployment flexibility: drone mounted sensors enable persistent, low-altitude coverage and quick re-tasking, fixed and mobile mounts support sustained surveillance corridors, and handheld units serve niche inspection and tactical roles. Application-driven requirements ultimately synthesize these elements-airport surveillance, coastal surveillance, homeland security with specific sub-focus areas such as border security and critical infrastructure protection, maritime navigation, perimeter surveillance, and wildlife monitoring each demand tailored sensor-performance and integration approaches. Understanding how these segmentation vectors intersect allows procurement and engineering teams to optimize trade-offs between capability, cost, and speed to operational utility.
Key regional perspectives on procurement trends, regulatory nuance, and industrial collaboration shaping radar deployment across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on technology adoption, procurement timelines, and industrial collaboration models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, legacy defense programs often catalyze innovation in radar subsystems, with a strong emphasis on integration into broader networked architectures and close collaboration between prime integrators and specialized component suppliers. Regulatory and spectrum allocation frameworks in this region tend to evolve in step with operational needs, which can accelerate deployment of novel waveforms and adaptive techniques.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where multinational programs, sovereign capability initiatives, and varying regulatory regimes interact. This region is characterized by a mix of legacy coastal and port surveillance requirements alongside investments in border security and critical infrastructure protection, driving demand for interoperable systems and standards-based integration. In Asia-Pacific, rapid infrastructure development, increased maritime traffic, and a growing focus on aerial domain awareness are driving demand for scalable, modular radar solutions suitable for both naval and coastal applications. Across all regions, supply chain localization, regulatory compliance, and partnerships with local industry players are recurring themes that guide go-to-market strategies and long-term sustainment planning.
Insight into competitive dynamics and collaborative ecosystems that influence procurement strategies, supplier portfolios, and phased capability insertion for radar programs
Competitive dynamics among established defense primes and specialized radar technology firms continue to shape capability trajectories and procurement frameworks. Leading system integrators are investing in digital engineering practices, accelerated prototyping, and interoperability toolchains to support multi-domain operations. These integrators often partner with focused technology suppliers that specialize in advanced RF components, solid-state transmitters, low-noise receivers, and ruggedized mechanically scanned arrays to reduce time-to-mission for new programs. At the same time, innovative smaller firms are leveraging software-defined radio architectures, commercial semiconductor advances, and machine learning to deliver niche solutions for specific surveillance tasks.
The ecosystem is also witnessing expanded collaboration between civil and defense stakeholders, enabling cross-pollination of ideas in areas such as persistent border surveillance and critical infrastructure protection. Strategic partnerships are frequently formed to combine scale and integration expertise with cutting-edge sensor design, enabling larger programs to adopt emerging capabilities with reduced technical risk. For procurement officers, understanding these partner ecosystems is essential to construct balanced supplier portfolios that combine proven scale with innovation velocity. Tactically, this often means contracting frameworks that allow for phased capability insertion, supplier performance metrics, and clear interoperability baselines to maintain program momentum while integrating new technologies.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to synchronize modular design, advanced processing, supply resilience, and regional partnerships to sustain radar operational advantage
Industry leaders must act proactively to align strategy, R&D investment, and procurement practices with the accelerating pace of technological and geopolitical change. First, adopt a modular architecture approach that prioritizes interchangeable subsystems, software-defined radios, and open integration standards to reduce the cost and time of capability upgrades while enabling supplier flexibility. Second, invest in advanced signal processing and edge classification capabilities to improve detection confidence in dense and contested electromagnetic environments, pairing algorithmic innovation with appropriate hardware acceleration to ensure real-time performance.
Third, build robust supplier risk management programs that include dual-sourcing, long-lead component inventory strategies, and design-for-supply alternatives to mitigate trade-policy and tariff disruptions. Fourth, pursue regional partnerships and local integration capabilities where regulations or operational realities favor sovereign or near-sovereign supply chains, while maintaining access to global innovation through strategic alliances. Fifth, prioritize lifecycle sustainment planning that accounts for software maintenance, security patching, and upgrade pathways to preserve operational availability. Taken together, these recommendations enable organizations to balance innovation with resilience, ensuring systems deliver sustained operational value while remaining responsive to emerging threats and policy shifts.
Rigorous multi-method research methodology combining primary expert engagement, technical synthesis, and scenario validation to produce actionable radar insights for decision-makers
The research approach underpinning this analysis blends primary engagement, secondary-source synthesis, and structured expert validation to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary engagement included interviews and structured conversations with program managers, systems engineers, procurement leads, and technology suppliers to capture first-hand perspectives on capability requirements, integration challenges, and supply chain realities. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with secondary-source technical literature, standards documentation, regulatory texts, and public-domain patent activity to establish technical baselines and identify innovation trajectories.
Analytical methods emphasized cross-segmentation synthesis-mapping platform constraints to frequency trade-offs, signal-processing techniques, mounting modalities, and end-use applications-to generate coherent capability profiles and procurement implications. Supply chain and policy impacts were assessed through scenario analysis that considered tariff disruption, supplier concentration, and regional industrial policy. Findings were validated through peer review with subject matter experts to surface potential blind spots and ensure practical relevance for decision-makers. This multi-method approach produces a defensible, practice-oriented set of insights suitable for both technical and executive audiences.
Conclusive synthesis emphasizing the need for modularity, edge analytics, and resilient supply strategies to sustain radar capability in a complex global environment
In conclusion, the security and surveillance radar domain is transitioning into an era defined by software-centric architectures, advanced signal processing, and supply chain realism. Organizations that embrace modularity, invest in edge analytics, and proactively manage supplier risk will be better positioned to meet evolving operational requirements and regulatory constraints. The confluence of technological advances-ranging from phased array agility to machine learning–driven classification-creates significant operational upside, but realizing that upside requires disciplined integration practices, lifecycle planning, and strategic partnerships that balance innovation with resilience.
Leaders must also remain attentive to policy and trade developments that can influence component availability and program economics. By aligning procurement strategies with flexible design philosophies and robust supplier ecosystems, stakeholders can accelerate capability deployment while safeguarding long-term sustainment. This balanced approach ensures that radar systems remain a dependable and adaptable cornerstone of homeland security, maritime safety, critical infrastructure protection, and broader situational awareness objectives in an increasingly complex security environment.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI and machine learning algorithms in radar intrusion detection systems
- 5.2. Adoption of 4D imaging radar solutions for enhanced perimeter security detection in critical infrastructure
- 5.3. Development of multi sensor fusion combining radar lidar and thermal imaging for accurate object classification
- 5.4. Use of mmWave radar networks for through wall detection and monitoring in high security zones
- 5.5. Implementation of cloud based analytics platforms for real time radar data processing and alerting
- 5.6. Emergence of portable drone mounted radar modules for rapid deployment in temporary security setups
- 5.7. Advances in software defined radar systems enabling remote updates and customizable threat detection
- 5.8. Integration of radar with building management systems for automated intrusion response and access control
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Platform
- 8.1. Airborne
- 8.2. Ground Based
- 8.3. Naval
- 8.4. Space Based
- 9. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Frequency
- 9.1. C Band
- 9.2. Ka Band
- 9.3. Ku Band
- 9.4. L Band
- 9.5. S Band
- 9.6. X Band
- 10. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Doppler
- 10.2. Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave
- 10.3. Phased Array
- 10.4. Pulse Doppler
- 11. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Mounting
- 11.1. Drone Mounted
- 11.2. Fixed
- 11.3. Handheld
- 11.4. Mobile
- 12. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Application
- 12.1. Airport Surveillance
- 12.2. Coastal Surveillance
- 12.3. Homeland Security
- 12.3.1. Border Security
- 12.3.2. Critical Infrastructure Protection
- 12.4. Maritime Navigation
- 12.5. Perimeter Surveillance
- 12.6. Wildlife Monitoring
- 13. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Security & Surveillance Radar Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 16.3.2. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.3. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 16.3.4. Thales S.A.
- 16.3.5. Leonardo S.p.A.
- 16.3.6. HENSOLDT AG
- 16.3.7. Saab AB
- 16.3.8. BAE Systems plc
- 16.3.9. Elbit Systems Ltd.
- 16.3.10. Indra Sistemas, S.A.
- 16.3.11. ASELSAN A.Ş.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
