Road Freight Transportation Market by Service Type (Full Truckload, Less Than Truckload, Parcel), Load Type (Dry Van, Flatbed, Refrigerated), Ownership Type, Vehicle Type, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Road Freight Transportation Market was valued at USD 628.68 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 664.06 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.80%, reaching USD 987.13 billion by 2032.
A concise strategic introduction that frames regulatory pressures, technology disruption, and changing trade dynamics reshaping commercial road freight networks
The road freight transportation sector is navigating a rapidly evolving intersection of regulatory pressure, technological innovation, and shifting trade patterns. Stakeholders from shippers to carriers are confronting new constraints and opportunities as supply chains adapt to consumer expectations for speed, transparency, and reliability. The rising prominence of e-commerce, the urgency of decarbonization commitments, and the uneven recovery of global trade have combined to reshape carrier networks, asset utilization, and service design across the freight ecosystem.
Against this backdrop, industry participants must reconcile short-term disruptions with longer-term structural change. In the near term, capacity imbalances, driver availability, and volatile input costs are testing existing operating models. Over the medium term, investments in electrification, digital freight matching, and automation will redefine cost structures and competitive differentiation. The introduction of targeted trade measures and evolving regional sourcing strategies further complicate route planning and inventory management. Consequently, leaders require an integrated perspective that connects regulatory developments, technology adoption, and customer requirements to practical operational and commercial choices.
An authoritative analysis of how digitalization, decarbonization, labor dynamics, and geopolitical sourcing are fundamentally transforming road freight operations
Several transformative shifts are converging to alter the landscape of road freight logistics, with implications for capacity allocation, service design, and investment priorities. First, digital adoption is accelerating: transportation management systems, telematics, and cloud-native platforms are enabling real-time visibility and dynamic routing that reduce empty miles and improve asset productivity. As a result, carriers and shippers are increasingly able to convert data into operational advantage through predictive analytics and tighter orchestration across multimodal networks.
Simultaneously, decarbonization imperatives are driving fleet modernization and the rollout of low-emission powertrains. This transition requires new capital allocation decisions, changes to maintenance regimes, and rethinking depot infrastructure to accommodate charging or alternative fuel provisioning. The human dimension remains critical as driver recruitment and retention challenges persist, prompting investments in labor productivity, ergonomic vehicle design, and improved driver experience.
Another key shift is the reconfiguration of supply chains in response to geopolitical tensions and diverse sourcing strategies. Firms are balancing inventory strategies and transit trade-offs, which catalyzes demand for flexible service types such as less-than-truckload and expedited regional distribution. Together, these forces are redefining competitive advantage from purely scale-based models toward service-oriented, digitally enabled, and sustainability-aligned propositions.
A practical examination of how 2025 tariff actions have reshaped lane economics, routing choices, and operational resilience across road freight networks
The cumulative imposition of tariffs by the United States in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity for freight planners and commercial negotiators. Tariff changes create differential cost pressures across lanes, which in turn influence carrier pricing strategies and shipper routing decisions. Consequently, companies are revisiting supplier footprints and modal mixes to mitigate increased landed costs, often prioritizing near-shore sourcing alternatives or shifting volumes to routes that avoid the highest duty exposure. These behavioral responses ripple through demand for truckload versus less-than-truckload services and alter seasonality patterns.
In response to the tariff-driven disruption, freight networks may experience transient capacity reallocations as carriers redeploy equipment and adjust backhaul strategies to capture emerging demand. Procurement teams are increasingly using multi-scenario planning to understand inventory placement trade-offs, recognizing that higher duties amplify the cost of expedited corrections to stockouts. Meanwhile, logistics service providers are offering enhanced visibility and tariff-aware routing tools to help customers quantify the operational implications of trade measures.
Importantly, the tariff environment incentivizes investment in supply chain resilience and contractual flexibility. Firms that proactively redesign lane structures, diversify supplier bases, and embed tariff sensitivity into route optimization are better positioned to preserve service levels and protect margins in an era of heightened trade policy volatility.
Comprehensive segmentation insights revealing how service types, vehicle classes, end-use requirements, load configurations, and ownership models drive differentiated operational outcomes
Differentiated service requirements and asset characteristics create distinct operational and commercial dynamics across the industry. When evaluated by service type, full truckload operations typically emphasize intercity long-haul optimization, asset scheduling, and volumetric pricing, while less-than-truckload offerings rely more heavily on network sorting, hub-and-spoke efficiencies, and piece-level handling. Parcel services, by contrast, stress density management, last-mile optimization, and high-frequency delivery windows that drive demand for agility and accurate ETAs.
Vehicle type introduces another layer of segmentation that affects operating costs, route eligibility, and payload optimization. Heavy duty trucks dominate long-haul and high-volume lanes where gross vehicle weight and durability matter, whereas light duty trucks enable urban distribution and smaller drop sizes with advantages in maneuverability and lower operating costs. Medium duty trucks serve hybrid roles, bridging regional distribution and denser urban deliveries where a balance of capacity and flexibility is required.
End-use verticals impose distinct service-level expectations and regulatory considerations. Automotive and retail flows prioritize scheduled, high-frequency shipments with precise timing, while chemicals and petrochemicals demand specialized handling, compliance, and often tanker or dedicated equipment. E-commerce drives high parcel volumes and requires integration with last-mile networks, whereas healthcare and pharmaceuticals add temperature control and traceability demands. Within food and beverage, nonperishable items permit longer lead times and consolidation strategies, while perishable goods necessitate refrigerated capacity and expedited transit. Load type further differentiates asset utilization: dry van operations focus on protected general cargo, flatbed supports oversized or irregular shipments, refrigerated fleets serve temperature-controlled goods, and tankers cater to liquid and bulk commodities. Finally, ownership models influence capital planning and operational control; leased fleets offer scalability and reduced capital intensity while owned fleets provide tighter control over maintenance standards, branding, and long-term asset strategies.
Regional operational and regulatory implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that dictate differentiated investment and network strategies
Regional dynamics are reshaping demand profiles, regulatory exposures, and investment priorities across global freight corridors. In the Americas, heterogeneous trade flows and a heavy reliance on road transport create intense demand for interregional connectivity, last-mile solutions, and cross-border compliance capabilities. Regulatory shifts and infrastructure bottlenecks in certain corridors are prompting investments in route optimization, transload facilities, and public-private partnerships to improve throughput and reduce dwell times.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, differing levels of infrastructure maturity and regulatory regimes require tailored strategies. In Western and Central Europe, dense urbanization and stringent emissions standards accelerate the adoption of low-emission fleets and urban consolidation centers, while parts of the Middle East and Africa present opportunities to modernize fleets and expand intermodal links. Cross-border harmonization and regional trade agreements influence lane design and the competitiveness of road versus rail for medium and long-haul shipments.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid e-commerce growth, diverse geographic conditions, and substantial investment in logistics infrastructure are creating both challenges and opportunities. Coastal megacities demand sophisticated last-mile networks and reinforcements in temperature-controlled capacity, whereas inland regions often require enhancements in intermodal connectivity and fleet modernization. Across these regions, carriers and shippers must balance global best practices with local operational realities to capture growth while maintaining compliance and resilience.
Actionable corporate strategies and capability investments that leading carriers and logistics providers deploy to secure resilience, scale, and differentiated service offerings
Leading companies in the road freight domain are converging on several strategic playbooks to secure competitive advantage. Investment in digital platforms that integrate planning, execution, and performance measurement is a focal area, with firms seeking to monetize visibility through value-added services such as predictive ETAs, dynamic pricing, and automated claims processing. Strategic partnerships and alliances are becoming more common as companies combine network reach, specialized equipment, and technological capabilities to deliver end-to-end solutions.
At the fleet level, early movers in electrification and alternative fuels are coordinating procurement with infrastructure partners to ensure depot readiness and to manage total cost of ownership. Operational excellence programs remain essential, emphasizing fuel efficiency, safety protocols, and maintenance regimes that extend asset life and reduce unplanned downtime. Companies are also experimenting with asset-light models and capacity pooling to improve utilization while retaining service-level control.
Mergers, targeted acquisitions, and minority investments in niche specialists such as cold chain providers, digital freight brokers, and regional carriers allow larger players to accelerate capability build-out without compromising speed to market. Successful firms combine disciplined capital allocation with a clear playbook for integrating acquisitions and scaling digital solutions across heterogeneous operating units.
High-impact operational and strategic recommendations that prioritize digital integration, staged decarbonization, tariff-aware procurement, network flexibility, and workforce resilience
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to translate insight into competitive advantage. First, accelerate digital integration across planning and execution layers to unlock visibility-led optimization; implementing telematics, robust TMS capabilities, and data governance will enable shorter decision cycles and reduce empty miles. Second, adopt a staged approach to fleet decarbonization that aligns vehicle acquisition with depot charging or refueling infrastructure, starting with high-utilization routes where total cost benefits materialize most quickly. Third, embed tariff sensitivity and scenario analysis into procurement and routing decisions so that procurement levers and contract terms cushion the business against policy-induced cost shocks.
In parallel, organizations should redesign network architectures to increase agility: invest in flexible transload points, micro-fulfillment centers for urban demand, and diversified carrier panels to maintain service continuity during disruptions. Talent strategies must also evolve; elevate driver experience through improved scheduling, training, and retention incentives while leveraging automation to augment productivity where feasible. Finally, pursue strategic collaborations for capacity sharing and cross-company sustainability initiatives that reduce duplicated investment and accelerate infrastructure deployment. Taken together, these measures will strengthen both day-to-day reliability and long-term strategic positioning.
A transparent mixed-methods research methodology combining primary executive input, secondary regulatory and technology analysis, and scenario-based sensitivity checks
The research underpinning this analysis employs a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative expert interviews, structured operator surveys, and extensive secondary research into regulatory frameworks, technology adoption, and trade policy developments. Primary engagements include conversations with senior logistics executives, fleet managers, procurement leaders, and technology vendors to capture practical perspectives on operational constraints and investment priorities. These insights are synthesized with published regulatory texts, infrastructure plans, and technology white papers to ensure a grounded understanding of external drivers.
Data triangulation is used to validate observed trends across independent sources and to identify areas of high confidence versus those requiring scenario planning. Sensitivity analysis explores the operational implications of variables such as fuel price volatility, tariff adjustments, and differing rates of technology uptake. Where relevant, case studies illustrate how specific companies implemented initiatives related to electrification, network redesign, or digital transformation, highlighting lessons learned and implementation pitfalls. The methodology emphasizes transparency and traceability so that users can reproduce assumptions and adapt scenario parameters to their own operating context.
A concluding synthesis emphasizing the imperative to balance near-term resilience initiatives with long-term investments in technology, decarbonization, and network redesign
In conclusion, road freight transportation stands at an inflection point where tactical responses to immediate disruptions must be balanced with strategic investments in technology, decarbonization, and network redesign. The interplay of tariff-driven trade realignments, accelerating digital capabilities, and evolving customer expectations demands a multifaceted response from carriers, shippers, and service providers. Those who integrate tariff-aware planning, prioritize high-value fleet upgrades, and harness data to optimize networks will gain durable advantages in cost, service, and sustainability.
Decision-makers should view current turbulence as an opportunity to recalibrate operating models: by embedding flexibility into contracts, diversifying sourcing and routing strategies, and collaborating across the logistics ecosystem, firms can improve resilience without sacrificing competitiveness. The recommended actions in this report provide a roadmap to navigate regulatory uncertainty, operational constraints, and technological change. Moving from insight to implementation will require disciplined project management, cross-functional alignment, and a willingness to pilot and scale effective solutions quickly.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise strategic introduction that frames regulatory pressures, technology disruption, and changing trade dynamics reshaping commercial road freight networks
The road freight transportation sector is navigating a rapidly evolving intersection of regulatory pressure, technological innovation, and shifting trade patterns. Stakeholders from shippers to carriers are confronting new constraints and opportunities as supply chains adapt to consumer expectations for speed, transparency, and reliability. The rising prominence of e-commerce, the urgency of decarbonization commitments, and the uneven recovery of global trade have combined to reshape carrier networks, asset utilization, and service design across the freight ecosystem.
Against this backdrop, industry participants must reconcile short-term disruptions with longer-term structural change. In the near term, capacity imbalances, driver availability, and volatile input costs are testing existing operating models. Over the medium term, investments in electrification, digital freight matching, and automation will redefine cost structures and competitive differentiation. The introduction of targeted trade measures and evolving regional sourcing strategies further complicate route planning and inventory management. Consequently, leaders require an integrated perspective that connects regulatory developments, technology adoption, and customer requirements to practical operational and commercial choices.
An authoritative analysis of how digitalization, decarbonization, labor dynamics, and geopolitical sourcing are fundamentally transforming road freight operations
Several transformative shifts are converging to alter the landscape of road freight logistics, with implications for capacity allocation, service design, and investment priorities. First, digital adoption is accelerating: transportation management systems, telematics, and cloud-native platforms are enabling real-time visibility and dynamic routing that reduce empty miles and improve asset productivity. As a result, carriers and shippers are increasingly able to convert data into operational advantage through predictive analytics and tighter orchestration across multimodal networks.
Simultaneously, decarbonization imperatives are driving fleet modernization and the rollout of low-emission powertrains. This transition requires new capital allocation decisions, changes to maintenance regimes, and rethinking depot infrastructure to accommodate charging or alternative fuel provisioning. The human dimension remains critical as driver recruitment and retention challenges persist, prompting investments in labor productivity, ergonomic vehicle design, and improved driver experience.
Another key shift is the reconfiguration of supply chains in response to geopolitical tensions and diverse sourcing strategies. Firms are balancing inventory strategies and transit trade-offs, which catalyzes demand for flexible service types such as less-than-truckload and expedited regional distribution. Together, these forces are redefining competitive advantage from purely scale-based models toward service-oriented, digitally enabled, and sustainability-aligned propositions.
A practical examination of how 2025 tariff actions have reshaped lane economics, routing choices, and operational resilience across road freight networks
The cumulative imposition of tariffs by the United States in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity for freight planners and commercial negotiators. Tariff changes create differential cost pressures across lanes, which in turn influence carrier pricing strategies and shipper routing decisions. Consequently, companies are revisiting supplier footprints and modal mixes to mitigate increased landed costs, often prioritizing near-shore sourcing alternatives or shifting volumes to routes that avoid the highest duty exposure. These behavioral responses ripple through demand for truckload versus less-than-truckload services and alter seasonality patterns.
In response to the tariff-driven disruption, freight networks may experience transient capacity reallocations as carriers redeploy equipment and adjust backhaul strategies to capture emerging demand. Procurement teams are increasingly using multi-scenario planning to understand inventory placement trade-offs, recognizing that higher duties amplify the cost of expedited corrections to stockouts. Meanwhile, logistics service providers are offering enhanced visibility and tariff-aware routing tools to help customers quantify the operational implications of trade measures.
Importantly, the tariff environment incentivizes investment in supply chain resilience and contractual flexibility. Firms that proactively redesign lane structures, diversify supplier bases, and embed tariff sensitivity into route optimization are better positioned to preserve service levels and protect margins in an era of heightened trade policy volatility.
Comprehensive segmentation insights revealing how service types, vehicle classes, end-use requirements, load configurations, and ownership models drive differentiated operational outcomes
Differentiated service requirements and asset characteristics create distinct operational and commercial dynamics across the industry. When evaluated by service type, full truckload operations typically emphasize intercity long-haul optimization, asset scheduling, and volumetric pricing, while less-than-truckload offerings rely more heavily on network sorting, hub-and-spoke efficiencies, and piece-level handling. Parcel services, by contrast, stress density management, last-mile optimization, and high-frequency delivery windows that drive demand for agility and accurate ETAs.
Vehicle type introduces another layer of segmentation that affects operating costs, route eligibility, and payload optimization. Heavy duty trucks dominate long-haul and high-volume lanes where gross vehicle weight and durability matter, whereas light duty trucks enable urban distribution and smaller drop sizes with advantages in maneuverability and lower operating costs. Medium duty trucks serve hybrid roles, bridging regional distribution and denser urban deliveries where a balance of capacity and flexibility is required.
End-use verticals impose distinct service-level expectations and regulatory considerations. Automotive and retail flows prioritize scheduled, high-frequency shipments with precise timing, while chemicals and petrochemicals demand specialized handling, compliance, and often tanker or dedicated equipment. E-commerce drives high parcel volumes and requires integration with last-mile networks, whereas healthcare and pharmaceuticals add temperature control and traceability demands. Within food and beverage, nonperishable items permit longer lead times and consolidation strategies, while perishable goods necessitate refrigerated capacity and expedited transit. Load type further differentiates asset utilization: dry van operations focus on protected general cargo, flatbed supports oversized or irregular shipments, refrigerated fleets serve temperature-controlled goods, and tankers cater to liquid and bulk commodities. Finally, ownership models influence capital planning and operational control; leased fleets offer scalability and reduced capital intensity while owned fleets provide tighter control over maintenance standards, branding, and long-term asset strategies.
Regional operational and regulatory implications across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that dictate differentiated investment and network strategies
Regional dynamics are reshaping demand profiles, regulatory exposures, and investment priorities across global freight corridors. In the Americas, heterogeneous trade flows and a heavy reliance on road transport create intense demand for interregional connectivity, last-mile solutions, and cross-border compliance capabilities. Regulatory shifts and infrastructure bottlenecks in certain corridors are prompting investments in route optimization, transload facilities, and public-private partnerships to improve throughput and reduce dwell times.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, differing levels of infrastructure maturity and regulatory regimes require tailored strategies. In Western and Central Europe, dense urbanization and stringent emissions standards accelerate the adoption of low-emission fleets and urban consolidation centers, while parts of the Middle East and Africa present opportunities to modernize fleets and expand intermodal links. Cross-border harmonization and regional trade agreements influence lane design and the competitiveness of road versus rail for medium and long-haul shipments.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid e-commerce growth, diverse geographic conditions, and substantial investment in logistics infrastructure are creating both challenges and opportunities. Coastal megacities demand sophisticated last-mile networks and reinforcements in temperature-controlled capacity, whereas inland regions often require enhancements in intermodal connectivity and fleet modernization. Across these regions, carriers and shippers must balance global best practices with local operational realities to capture growth while maintaining compliance and resilience.
Actionable corporate strategies and capability investments that leading carriers and logistics providers deploy to secure resilience, scale, and differentiated service offerings
Leading companies in the road freight domain are converging on several strategic playbooks to secure competitive advantage. Investment in digital platforms that integrate planning, execution, and performance measurement is a focal area, with firms seeking to monetize visibility through value-added services such as predictive ETAs, dynamic pricing, and automated claims processing. Strategic partnerships and alliances are becoming more common as companies combine network reach, specialized equipment, and technological capabilities to deliver end-to-end solutions.
At the fleet level, early movers in electrification and alternative fuels are coordinating procurement with infrastructure partners to ensure depot readiness and to manage total cost of ownership. Operational excellence programs remain essential, emphasizing fuel efficiency, safety protocols, and maintenance regimes that extend asset life and reduce unplanned downtime. Companies are also experimenting with asset-light models and capacity pooling to improve utilization while retaining service-level control.
Mergers, targeted acquisitions, and minority investments in niche specialists such as cold chain providers, digital freight brokers, and regional carriers allow larger players to accelerate capability build-out without compromising speed to market. Successful firms combine disciplined capital allocation with a clear playbook for integrating acquisitions and scaling digital solutions across heterogeneous operating units.
High-impact operational and strategic recommendations that prioritize digital integration, staged decarbonization, tariff-aware procurement, network flexibility, and workforce resilience
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to translate insight into competitive advantage. First, accelerate digital integration across planning and execution layers to unlock visibility-led optimization; implementing telematics, robust TMS capabilities, and data governance will enable shorter decision cycles and reduce empty miles. Second, adopt a staged approach to fleet decarbonization that aligns vehicle acquisition with depot charging or refueling infrastructure, starting with high-utilization routes where total cost benefits materialize most quickly. Third, embed tariff sensitivity and scenario analysis into procurement and routing decisions so that procurement levers and contract terms cushion the business against policy-induced cost shocks.
In parallel, organizations should redesign network architectures to increase agility: invest in flexible transload points, micro-fulfillment centers for urban demand, and diversified carrier panels to maintain service continuity during disruptions. Talent strategies must also evolve; elevate driver experience through improved scheduling, training, and retention incentives while leveraging automation to augment productivity where feasible. Finally, pursue strategic collaborations for capacity sharing and cross-company sustainability initiatives that reduce duplicated investment and accelerate infrastructure deployment. Taken together, these measures will strengthen both day-to-day reliability and long-term strategic positioning.
A transparent mixed-methods research methodology combining primary executive input, secondary regulatory and technology analysis, and scenario-based sensitivity checks
The research underpinning this analysis employs a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative expert interviews, structured operator surveys, and extensive secondary research into regulatory frameworks, technology adoption, and trade policy developments. Primary engagements include conversations with senior logistics executives, fleet managers, procurement leaders, and technology vendors to capture practical perspectives on operational constraints and investment priorities. These insights are synthesized with published regulatory texts, infrastructure plans, and technology white papers to ensure a grounded understanding of external drivers.
Data triangulation is used to validate observed trends across independent sources and to identify areas of high confidence versus those requiring scenario planning. Sensitivity analysis explores the operational implications of variables such as fuel price volatility, tariff adjustments, and differing rates of technology uptake. Where relevant, case studies illustrate how specific companies implemented initiatives related to electrification, network redesign, or digital transformation, highlighting lessons learned and implementation pitfalls. The methodology emphasizes transparency and traceability so that users can reproduce assumptions and adapt scenario parameters to their own operating context.
A concluding synthesis emphasizing the imperative to balance near-term resilience initiatives with long-term investments in technology, decarbonization, and network redesign
In conclusion, road freight transportation stands at an inflection point where tactical responses to immediate disruptions must be balanced with strategic investments in technology, decarbonization, and network redesign. The interplay of tariff-driven trade realignments, accelerating digital capabilities, and evolving customer expectations demands a multifaceted response from carriers, shippers, and service providers. Those who integrate tariff-aware planning, prioritize high-value fleet upgrades, and harness data to optimize networks will gain durable advantages in cost, service, and sustainability.
Decision-makers should view current turbulence as an opportunity to recalibrate operating models: by embedding flexibility into contracts, diversifying sourcing and routing strategies, and collaborating across the logistics ecosystem, firms can improve resilience without sacrificing competitiveness. The recommended actions in this report provide a roadmap to navigate regulatory uncertainty, operational constraints, and technological change. Moving from insight to implementation will require disciplined project management, cross-functional alignment, and a willingness to pilot and scale effective solutions quickly.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of electric and hydrogen fuel cell trucks for decarbonization of long-haul routes
- 5.2. Implementation of blockchain-enabled logistics platforms for real-time freight transparency
- 5.3. Deployment of telematics and predictive maintenance to minimize unscheduled vehicle downtime
- 5.4. Expansion of cross-border corridor infrastructure to streamline customs and border processing
- 5.5. Utilization of dynamic pricing algorithms to balance capacity and optimize carrier profitability
- 5.6. Integration of autonomous platooning technology to improve fuel efficiency and road safety
- 5.7. Growth of intermodal partnerships combining road, rail, and maritime networks for last-mile freight
- 5.8. Regulatory push for stricter emissions standards driving investment in sustainable fleet upgrades
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Full Truckload
- 8.2. Less Than Truckload
- 8.3. Parcel
- 9. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Load Type
- 9.1. Dry Van
- 9.2. Flatbed
- 9.3. Refrigerated
- 9.4. Tanker
- 10. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Ownership Type
- 10.1. Leased Fleet
- 10.2. Owned Fleet
- 11. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Vehicle Type
- 11.1. Heavy Duty Truck
- 11.2. Light Duty Truck
- 11.3. Medium Duty Truck
- 12. Road Freight Transportation Market, by End Use
- 12.1. Automotive
- 12.2. Chemicals And Petrochemicals
- 12.3. E-Commerce
- 12.4. Food And Beverage
- 12.4.1. Nonperishable
- 12.4.2. Perishable
- 12.5. Healthcare And Pharmaceuticals
- 12.6. Retail
- 13. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Road Freight Transportation Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S
- 16.3.2. Beroe Inc.
- 16.3.3. Cargo Carriers (Pty) Limited
- 16.3.4. CEVA Logistics by CMA CGM Group
- 16.3.5. CJ Darcl Logistics Ltd.
- 16.3.6. CJ Logistics Corporation
- 16.3.7. Delhivery Limited
- 16.3.8. Deutsche Post AG
- 16.3.9. DSV A/S
- 16.3.10. Ecom Express Limited
- 16.3.11. FedEx Corporation
- 16.3.12. First European Logistics Ltd.
- 16.3.13. FM Logistic
- 16.3.14. Gati Limited
- 16.3.15. Geodis by SNCF Logistics
- 16.3.16. Ital Logistics Limited
- 16.3.17. Kerry Logistics Network Limited by SF Express
- 16.3.18. Kuehne + Nagel Management AG
- 16.3.19. Nippon Express Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Overland Total Logistics Services (M) Sdn Bhd
- 16.3.21. Safexpress Private Limited
- 16.3.22. Schenker AG
- 16.3.23. Transport Corporation of India Limited
- 16.3.24. Varuna Group
- 16.3.25. VRL Logistics Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
