Report cover image

Residential Energy Storage Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Power Rating (10-20 KW, Less than 10 KW, More than 20 KW), Connectivity Type, Cell Format, Thermal Management, Energy Capacity, System Architecture, Application, Installation T

Publisher 360iResearch
Published Jan 13, 2026
Length 181 Pages
SKU # IRE20723609

Description

The Residential Energy Storage Market was valued at USD 14.15 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 16.07 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 14.22%, reaching USD 41.01 billion by 2032.

A strategic overview of the forces reshaping residential energy storage adoption and technology trajectories for resilient, grid-aware household electrification

Residential energy storage is transitioning from a nascent convenience to a foundational element of distributed energy systems, driven by converging technology, policy, and consumer demand. Homeowners are increasingly motivated by resilience against grid disruptions, economic optimization under time-of-use tariffs, and the desire to pair rooftop generation with storage to maximize self-consumption. At the same time, electrification trends-particularly the growth of electric vehicle adoption and electrified heating-are raising household electricity demand profiles and creating new synergies for behind-the-meter storage.

Technological maturation is equally important. Battery chemistries that emphasize safety,cycle life, and cost per kilowatt-hour are increasingly displacing legacy options, and inverter and control electronics have become more sophisticated, enabling seamless islanding, grid services, and integration with smart home ecosystems. Software layers for system monitoring, predictive maintenance, and techno-economic analysis have emerged from niche utilities and industrial applications into consumer-facing platforms that influence purchase decisions. Concurrently, financing innovation-from outright purchase to leases and subscription models-has lowered the entry barrier, altering adoption dynamics.

Regulatory and incentive frameworks continue to shape deployment patterns. Utility tariff structures, resilience programs, and fiscal incentives designed to encourage local manufacturing and domestic content are materially affecting procurement choices and supplier strategies. Taken together, these forces create a rapidly evolving market where product differentiation, modularity, and after-sales services will determine long-term competitiveness. The following analysis sets out the structural shifts, policy impacts, granular segmentation insights, and regional dynamics that executives and investors need to navigate this next phase of market evolution.

How chemistry diversification, software-centric offerings, system architecture evolution, and supply chain reconfiguration are redefining competitive advantage in residential storage

The residential energy storage landscape is undergoing a series of transformative shifts that are reshaping how products are designed, financed, and delivered to end customers. One primary shift is the rapid rise of chemistry-led differentiation: lithium-ion formats optimized for cost, safety, and cycle life are gaining market preference, while emergent chemistries such as sodium-ion are attracting new investment for specific use cases where raw material advantages matter. This chemical diversification is prompting manufacturers to re-evaluate sourcing strategies and product roadmaps.

Another major shift is the elevation of software and services as core differentiators. System monitoring, remote diagnostics, and techno-economic analysis tools are moving beyond novelty to become essential elements of product suites. These layers enable predictive maintenance, dynamic energy management, and value stacking across resilience and grid services, and they change the economics of ownership for both customers and third-party operators. Equally consequential is the move from product-centric to service-centric commercial models: finance providers, aggregator platforms, and subscription services are offering alternatives to outright ownership, broadening the addressable market.

Architectural shifts are also evident at system level. Hybrid inverter systems and DC-coupled topologies are gaining prominence because they allow greater integration with photovoltaic generation and EV charging, improving round-trip efficiency and reducing installation complexity. Thermal management and form-factor innovations are reducing installation footprints and improving safety profiles, which helps accelerate permitting and acceptance in dense urban environments. Finally, supply chain reconfiguration-driven by trade policy, incentives for domestic production, and lessons from global disruptions-has prompted manufacturers to diversify suppliers, localize critical assembly steps, and invest in second-life and recycling capacity. These shifts collectively create windows of opportunity for incumbents and new entrants alike, while raising the bar for those who cannot move beyond commodity hardware.

Assessment of how United States tariff measures through 2025 have catalyzed supply chain regionalization, domestic investment, and product redesign across the residential storage value chain

By 2025, cumulative United States tariff and trade measures have exerted a complex influence on the residential energy storage value chain, accelerating supply chain reorientation and influencing commercial strategies across stakeholders. Tariff actions-alongside incentives that reward domestic content-have increased the relative cost of certain imported components, which in turn has encouraged manufacturers to pursue closer geographic proximity to final assembly and to secure long-term contracts for key inputs. This rebalancing has material implications for procurement teams, capital allocation decisions, and the pace at which new capacity comes online.

The tariff environment has also raised transaction costs for cross-border procurement, prompting many suppliers to shift toward regional hubs and to evaluate vertical integration as a risk mitigation strategy. For system integrators and installers, increased component lead times and price volatility have elevated the importance of inventory management and contractual flexibility. These dynamics have encouraged a bifurcation in the market: suppliers investing in localized cell or module production to meet domestic content requirements, and others focusing on product differentiation where tariff exposure is lower, such as software, services, and integrated system design.

Downstream impacts are visible among residential consumers and financiers. Higher upstream costs have led some manufacturers to redesign products for easier local assembly and to prioritize chemistries that rely on more abundant or domestically accessible feedstocks. At the same time, policy incentives that reward domestic manufacturing have created new investment channels and public-private partnerships, which mitigate some of the tariff-induced headwinds. Legal challenges and exemption mechanisms have appeared as well, creating regulatory complexity that requires dedicated legal and trade expertise.

On balance, tariffs through 2025 have been a catalyst for structural change rather than a simple market impediment. They have accelerated regional manufacturing investment, prioritized supply chain resilience, and pushed suppliers toward greater product modularity and service differentiation. For stakeholders focused on long-term competitiveness, the message is clear: prioritize supply diversification, embed flexibility into sourcing contracts, and align product roadmaps with policy-driven incentives to capture emerging advantages stemming from regional industrial strategies.

In-depth segmentation intelligence across components, architectures, applications, and ownership models to guide product design, commercial strategies, and service differentiation

A granular view of segmentation reveals where product strategy, go-to-market choices, and service design create value across the residential storage ecosystem. Component-level distinctions matter deeply: hardware remains central and is composed of batteries, controllers, inverters, and power meters, and the batteries themselves are differentiated into lead-acid, lithium-ion, and sodium-ion chemistries. Among lead-acid variants the market still supports both flooded and sealed formats, with sealed batteries further split into absorbent glass mat and gel constructions, while lithium-ion spans multiple cathode and architecture options including lithium iron phosphate, lithium manganese oxide, lithium titanate, nickel cobalt aluminum, and nickel manganese cobalt. Services around installation and ongoing system maintenance and support are increasingly critical to long-term customer satisfaction, and software capabilities such as system monitoring and techno-economic analysis tools are now essential for operational optimization and value stacking.

Power rating segmentation-covering less than 10 kilowatts, 10–20 kilowatts, and more than 20 kilowatts-shapes product packaging and recommended applications, with lower ratings aligning with single-family homes and higher ratings serving larger dwellings or properties with EV charging needs. Connectivity type, whether off-grid or on-grid, determines system architecture choices and compliance requirements, while cell format choices among cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic designs influence thermal management strategies and mechanical integration. Thermal management approaches themselves, including air-cooled, liquid-cooled, and passive systems, determine installation complexity, long-term reliability, and safety certifications.

Energy capacity preferences-spanning less than or equal to 5 kilowatt-hours up to greater than 20 kilowatt-hours and intermediate 5–10, 10–15, and 15–20 bands-reflect different use cases from short-duration resilience to full-day self-consumption optimization. System architecture choices-AC-coupled, DC-coupled, and hybrid inverter systems-drive round-trip efficiency and compatibility with PV and EV charging. Application-focused segmentation for backup power supply, EV charging support, off-grid living, peak shaving, self-consumption optimization, and time-of-use load shifting identifies where value streams accrue and which revenue models are viable. Installation type, whether new installations or retrofits, affects permitting, project economics, and choice of modularity. Finally, ownership type-customer owned versus third-party owned, with third-party ownership further split into lease and subscription options-shapes the financing model and long-term service obligations.

Taken together, these segmentation layers demand that manufacturers and service providers design modular product portfolios, create flexible financing and ownership alternatives, and build software tools that translate technical capabilities into clear household-level economic benefits. Strategic alignment across component choices, system architecture, and software-enabled services will determine which products are adopted by discerning customers and which business models achieve sustainable margins.

Regional demand drivers and industrial dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific informing differentiated go-to-market and investment approaches

Regional dynamics are a decisive factor in strategy and execution for residential energy storage. In the Americas, policy incentives, resilience programs, and the growth of rooftop solar are driving demand for storage solutions that prioritize safety, long cycle life, and simplified installation. Investment incentives tied to domestic content have stimulated local cell and module assembly, creating opportunities for suppliers that can localize critical production steps and shorten lead times. The customer base in many parts of the region is focused on resilience against extreme weather events and on capturing savings under time-of-use tariff structures, which increases interest in hybrid systems that integrate EV charging.

Europe, the Middle East and Africa display heterogeneous but complementary drivers. European markets emphasize decarbonization, grid flexibility, and aggregator-ready systems that can provide ancillary services; regulatory ecosystems favor interoperability, standardized communications, and integration with home energy management systems. In parts of the Middle East, rapid electrification and distributed solar programs support demand for robust thermal management and high-temperature chemistries, while in Africa off-grid and hybrid mini-grid solutions create distinct opportunities for modular and scalable storage architectures. Across these regions, third-party ownership and leasing models are becoming more common as a means of lowering upfront barriers and enabling broader access to storage benefits.

Asia-Pacific remains a dual landscape defined by high manufacturing capacity and rapidly growing domestic demand. Major manufacturing hubs retain advantages in cell production and component supply, while national policies and energy transition targets are spurring domestic deployments. Markets across the region vary widely: some prioritize low-cost, high-energy-density chemistries to serve utility-linked projects, while others focus on safety and extended warranties for dense urban deployments. Export-oriented supply chains continue to influence global component flows, even as local incentives encourage domestic assembly and value capture. For multinational companies and investors, these regional distinctions require tailored market entry strategies that reflect local regulatory frameworks, grid characteristics, and consumer preferences.

Competitive dynamics and partnership strategies across cell manufacturers, system integrators, software platforms, and financing partners shaping future market leaders

Competitive dynamics across the value chain reflect clear specialization and increasing convergence. At one end of the spectrum are cell and materials manufacturers whose core advantages derive from chemistry expertise, raw material access, and scale production capabilities; these firms are investing to improve safety, reduce cobalt exposure, and scale LFP and emergent sodium-ion formats. At the system integration layer, inverter and controller specialists are differentiating through efficiency gains, islanding capabilities, and standardized communications stacks that facilitate aggregator participation and utility interoperability. Installers and project developers compete on speed-to-market, quality of workmanship, and the ability to bundle storage with PV and EV charging offerings.

Software vendors and platform providers are consolidating their role by offering monitoring, predictive maintenance, and techno-economic analysis tools that enable value stacking and aggregation. These capabilities are increasingly the locus of recurring revenue and customer lock-in. Meanwhile, financing partners, leasing platforms, and third-party ownership models are reshaping the customer acquisition funnel and creating longer-term service obligations that favor players with robust operations and maintenance infrastructure. Strategic partnerships and vertical integration-where hardware providers partner with software firms or downstream aggregators-are becoming more common as companies seek to internalize value chains and reduce exposure to component price swings.

Finally, new entrants and specialized challengers are accelerating niche innovation, particularly around thermal management, battery pack design for safer installations, and retrofit-friendly systems. For incumbents, the imperative is to balance scale efficiency with rapid product iteration and differentiated customer experiences. For investors and strategic buyers, the most attractive propositions combine strong technology IP, established distribution channels, and a clear path to recurring service revenues.

Practical and coordinated actions for manufacturers, integrators, and service providers to secure supply resilience, differentiate offerings, and accelerate profitable growth

Industry leaders should pursue a set of coordinated actions to capture near-term demand while positioning for long-term resilience. First, prioritize supply chain resilience by diversifying sourcing across regions and negotiating flexible, medium-term supply contracts that allow for rapid shifts in input pricing. Coupled with this, invest selectively in local assembly or strategic partnerships with regional manufacturers to meet domestic content incentives and reduce lead times. These moves will reduce exposure to trade policy shocks and support faster customer fulfillment.

Second, accelerate investment in software and services. Firms that bundle high-quality monitoring, predictive maintenance, and techno-economic tools with hardware will command higher lifetime revenues and improved customer retention. Develop modular software APIs that facilitate integration with utility programs and aggregator platforms to enable revenue stacking for customers and monetization for providers. Third, adopt chemistry-agnostic product roadmaps that can incorporate LFP, sodium-ion, and other cell formats as commercial viability and supply dynamics evolve; design battery packs and BMS architectures that allow for cell replacement or upgrades without full system overhaul.

Fourth, create flexible ownership and financing options, including lease and subscription models, to capture customers reluctant to make large upfront investments. Pair these offers with robust service level agreements and digital engagement tools to lower churn. Fifth, prioritize safety and simplified installation through standardized mechanical interfaces, pre-assembled modules for retrofits, and clear documentation to reduce permitting friction. Lastly, engage proactively with policymakers and utilities to shape incentive structures and grid integration standards, and allocate resources for scenario planning and trade compliance to navigate tariffs and regulatory uncertainty. Executed in concert, these steps will translate strategic insight into sustained commercial performance.

A transparent and multi-method research framework combining expert interviews, supply chain mapping, techno-economic modeling, and scenario planning to ensure robust insights

This research synthesizes primary and secondary sources through a rigorous, repeatable methodology designed to ensure analytical integrity and actionable insight. Primary research included structured interviews with a cross-section of industry stakeholders-cell and module manufacturers, inverter designers, system integrators, installers, software vendors, finance partners, and regulatory experts-supplemented by a series of expert panels to test hypotheses and validate emergent themes. These qualitative inputs were triangulated with an extensive review of policy documents, standards, trade measures, and technology roadmaps to ground conclusions in regulatory and technical reality.

Quantitative elements relied on supply chain mapping, component-level cost modeling, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis to explore the implications of tariff actions, chemistry transitions, and architectural choices. Techno-economic analysis tools were used to model household-level value propositions across differing tariff structures, ownership models, and usage profiles, while careful attention to installation constraints and permitting regimes informed practical deployment considerations. Data quality assurance included cross-validation of primary interview findings against company disclosures, patent filings, and publicly available technical specifications.

Finally, the research applied a segmentation-first approach to ensure that insights are directly relevant to product managers, investors, and policy analysts. Findings were stress-tested through scenario planning and reviewed by an independent advisory panel to identify bias and confirm robustness. Where applicable, methodological limitations are disclosed in the appendix, and an outcomes-focused set of recommendations ties research learnings to operational initiatives and investment priorities.

A concise synthesis of why modular hardware, software-enabled services, and supply resilience will determine competitive advantage in residential energy storage

Residential energy storage sits at the intersection of rapid technological improvement, shifting policy incentives, and changing consumer expectations. The sector’s near-term trajectory is being shaped by chemistry choices that prioritize safety and resource diversification, by software and services that unlock additional value streams, and by regional policy measures that reconfigure supply chains and stimulate domestic investment. These trends create a landscape where product modularity, after-sales services, and flexible ownership models will separate winners from laggards.

Trade measures and tariff dynamics through 2025 have functioned less as terminal obstacles and more as accelerants for structural change, incentivizing localized production and elevating the strategic importance of supply resilience. Regional differences in regulatory priorities and grid characteristics mean that a one-size-fits-all approach will not succeed; instead, tailored strategies that align technology choices, commercial models, and go-to-market plans with local drivers will be necessary. Ultimately, firms that integrate differentiated hardware, compelling software-enabled services, and robust financing solutions will be best positioned to capture enduring value.

The next phase of market development will reward organizations that move decisively: those that build flexible supply chains, invest in modular and upgradeable products, and create customer-centric services tuned to the realities of regional markets will achieve sustainable advantage. The insights and recommendations in this report are intended to shorten the path from strategic intent to operational execution for executives, investors, and product teams navigating this rapidly evolving sector.

Table of Contents

181 Pages
1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2024
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Component
8.1. Hardware
8.1.1. Batteries
8.1.1.1. Lead-Acid Batteries
8.1.1.1.1. Flooded
8.1.1.1.2. Sealed
8.1.1.1.2.1. Absorbent Glass Mat
8.1.1.1.2.2. Gel
8.1.1.2. Lithium-ion Batteries
8.1.1.2.1. Lithium Iron Phosphate
8.1.1.2.2. Lithium Manganese Oxide
8.1.1.2.3. Lithium Titanate
8.1.1.2.4. Nickel Cobalt Aluminum
8.1.1.2.5. Nickel Manganese Cobalt
8.1.1.3. Sodium-Ion
8.1.2. Controllers
8.1.3. Inverters
8.1.4. Power Meters
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Installation
8.2.2. System Maintenance & Support
8.3. Software
8.3.1. System Monitoring & Control
8.3.2. Techno-Economic Analysis Tools
9. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Power Rating
9.1. 10-20 KW
9.2. Less than 10 KW
9.3. More than 20 KW
10. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Connectivity Type
10.1. Off-Grid
10.2. On-Grid
11. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Cell Format
11.1. Cylindrical
11.2. Pouch
11.3. Prismatic
12. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Thermal Management
12.1. Air-Cooled
12.2. Liquid-Cooled
12.3. Passive
13. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Energy Capacity
13.1. 10–15 kWh
13.2. 15–20 kWh
13.3. 5–10 kWh
13.4. >20 kWh
13.5. ≤5 kWh
14. Residential Energy Storage Market, by System Architecture
14.1. AC-Coupled
14.2. DC-Coupled
14.3. Hybrid Inverter System
15. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Application
15.1. Backup Power Supply
15.2. EV Charging Support
15.3. Off-Grid Living
15.4. Peak Shaving
15.5. Self-Consumption Optimization
15.6. Time-of-Use Load Shifting
16. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Installation Type
16.1. New Installations
16.2. Retrofits
17. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Ownership Type
17.1. Customer Owned
17.2. Third-Party Owned
17.2.1. Lease
17.2.2. Subscription
18. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Region
18.1. Americas
18.1.1. North America
18.1.2. Latin America
18.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
18.2.1. Europe
18.2.2. Middle East
18.2.3. Africa
18.3. Asia-Pacific
19. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Group
19.1. ASEAN
19.2. GCC
19.3. European Union
19.4. BRICS
19.5. G7
19.6. NATO
20. Residential Energy Storage Market, by Country
20.1. United States
20.2. Canada
20.3. Mexico
20.4. Brazil
20.5. United Kingdom
20.6. Germany
20.7. France
20.8. Russia
20.9. Italy
20.10. Spain
20.11. China
20.12. India
20.13. Japan
20.14. Australia
20.15. South Korea
21. United States Residential Energy Storage Market
22. China Residential Energy Storage Market
23. Competitive Landscape
23.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2024
23.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
23.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
23.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2024
23.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2024
23.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2024
23.5. Eaton Corporation PLC
23.6. Enphase Energy, Inc.
23.7. Generac Holdings, Inc.
23.8. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
23.9. LG Corporation
23.10. Panasonic Holdings Corporation
23.11. SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
23.12. Schneider Electric SE
23.13. Siemens AG
23.14. SMA Solar Technology AG
23.15. Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd
23.16. Tesla, Inc.
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY POWER RATING, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CONNECTIVITY TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY CELL FORMAT, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY THERMAL MANAGEMENT, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY ENERGY CAPACITY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY INSTALLATION TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY OWNERSHIP TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 14. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 15. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 16. GLOBAL RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 17. UNITED STATES RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 18. CHINA RESIDENTIAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.