Refrigerants Market by Refrigerant Type (Fluorinated Refrigerants, Natural Refrigerants), Blend Type (Azeotropic Mixtures, Zeotropic Mixtures), Form, Application, Distribution Channels, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Refinery Catalysts Market was valued at USD 6.04 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 6.33 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.07%, reaching USD 8.97 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive overview of refinery catalyst landscape highlighting material innovations, operational imperatives, sustainability drivers and regulatory pressures
The refinery catalysts landscape is at the confluence of technological innovation, evolving feedstock profiles, regulatory change and intensifying pressure to reduce environmental impacts. In recent years, refiners and catalyst suppliers have had to adapt simultaneously to shifts in crude characteristics, demands for lighter and cleaner fuels, and the rising need to integrate circular economy principles. Within that context, material science advances-spanning chemical supports, metal active phases, and engineered zeolites-are driving new trade-offs between activity, selectivity, longevity and cost of ownership.
Transitioning operational paradigms, from batch adjustments to continuous process optimization, is now a strategic priority for operators seeking to preserve margins while meeting stricter emissions and product quality standards. This introduction frames the core dynamics that decision-makers must consider: the interplay between catalyst formulation and process architecture, procurement complexity tied to specialized raw materials, and the growing influence of policy and sustainability imperatives. The following analysis unpacks these drivers and their implications for sourcing strategies, process upgrades and collaborative innovation agendas among producers and technology providers.
Emerging technological and policy shifts redefining catalyst selection, process integration, feedstock strategies and digital enablement across refineries
The industry is experiencing transformative shifts that affect how catalysts are designed, procured and deployed across refining operations. Advances in precision synthesis and characterization enable tailored active site architectures and support morphologies that increase tolerance to contaminants and extend on-stream life. Concurrently, digitalization is reshaping process monitoring and predictive maintenance, allowing catalyst performance to be assessed in near real time and enabling condition-based regeneration and replacement strategies. These technological developments reduce unexpected downtime and permit refiners to extract greater value from higher-cost, higher-performance catalyst formulations.
Policy-driven transitions are exerting parallel pressure: tighter emissions requirements, evolving fuel specifications, and incentives for lower-carbon pathways compel refiners to re-evaluate catalyst lifecycles and end-of-life handling. Feedstock volatility has encouraged flexible catalyst platforms capable of operating across varying crude slates and blended streams. At the same time, supply chain dynamics have shifted sourcing priorities toward resilience and supplier diversification, prompting longer-term supplier partnerships and localized inventory strategies. The combined effect is a redefinition of the competitive landscape in which material innovation, digital enablement, and procurement resilience determine who can respond most effectively to rapid change.
Analysis of cumulative effects from United States tariffs in 2025 on catalyst supply chains, trade flows, procurement strategies and domestic competitiveness
The introduction of tariffs by the United States in 2025 has created a set of cumulative effects that propagate through the catalyst ecosystem, influencing supply chain architecture, procurement behavior, and strategic sourcing decisions. Tariff-imposed cost differentials have made reliance on a narrow set of international suppliers less tenable, prompting both buyers and suppliers to reassess total landed cost, lead time risk, and inventory strategies. In many instances, this has accelerated conversations around nearshoring, dual sourcing and vertical integration as mechanisms to reduce exposure to trade friction.
Beyond procurement, the tariff environment has driven refiners to evaluate formulation flexibility, seeking catalyst systems that can be sourced from multiple suppliers or that rely more heavily on commoditized support materials. Where certain high-performance metal phases became subject to tighter import taxes or quotas, organizations prioritized process-side adjustments to reduce metal loading without compromising conversion targets, and invested in regeneration and reclamation capabilities to recover critical elements. Moreover, the regulatory signal from tariffs has motivated dialogues between industry and policymakers regarding strategic domestic capabilities for key catalyst materials, and has highlighted the importance of supply chain transparency, traceability and secure logistics to ensure continuity of operations.
Insightful segmentation analysis revealing how catalyst types, application pathways and end user industry profiles intersect to influence performance and sourcing decisions
A nuanced view of segmentation reveals distinct technical and commercial considerations across catalyst type, application domain and end user industry. When considering types, chemical compound supports such as alumina and silica present different mechanical strengths, acid-base properties and thermal stability that govern their suitability for various processes; metal catalysts subdivide into precious metals, rare earth metals and transition and base metals, each delivering unique activity profiles and cost structures; zeolites exist as natural and synthetic variants with tunable pore structures and ion-exchange capacities that inform selectivity and regeneration behavior. These material-level distinctions interact with application demands: alkylation, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrocracking and isomerization each impose differentiated requirements for acidity, metal dispersion and thermal resistance, and within those domains sub-applications such as diesel production versus gasoline production in fluid catalytic cracking, or middle distillates versus naphtha in hydrocracking, create further specificity in catalyst design.
End user industry orientation further frames value metrics and procurement priorities. Chemical manufacturing units typically emphasize catalytic selectivity and downstream purity to meet tightly controlled reaction networks, whereas fuel additives manufacturers prioritize active phases that deliver consistent octane or anti-knock performance and that integrate well with blending operations; oil and gas refineries evaluate catalysts through the lens of cycle life, turnaround intervals and compatibility with existing reactor internals. Within fuel additives, differentiation between anti-knocking agents and octane enhancers shapes supplier selection, regulatory compliance approaches and the emphasis placed on reclaiming valuable metals. Taken together, segmentation highlights why a one-size-fits-all approach is suboptimal and why cross-functional assessments-linking R&D, operations and procurement-are essential for selecting the right catalyst architecture for each operational footprint.
Regional insights synthesizing demand, supply chain resilience, regulatory trends and investment appetite across Americas, EMEA and APAC markets
Regional dynamics manifest through regulatory regimes, feedstock characteristics, infrastructure maturity and capital allocation preferences, producing distinct strategic priorities across the global landscape. In the Americas, emphasis commonly falls on upgrading existing refinery assets to meet evolving fuel quality standards and on securing resilient supply chains for critical catalyst components, with procurement strategies reflecting a balance between cost management and operational continuity. Europe, Middle East & Africa combines mature regulatory frameworks in some markets with rapid capacity additions and feedstock variability in others, driving heterogeneous requirements for catalyst performance and lifecycle services and encouraging modular, adaptable solutions.
Asia-Pacific presents a differentiated picture characterized by accelerating refining capacity, varied crude sources and a growing appetite for technology partnerships that embed local manufacturing, service capabilities and knowledge transfer. Across these regions, investment appetite and regulatory pressure shape local industry responses: some markets prioritize emission reduction and decarbonization roadmaps, while others emphasize throughput and product slate optimization. The interaction between regional policy, infrastructure readiness and supplier footprint frequently determines whether refiners pursue on-site regeneration, long-term vendor-managed inventory, or engineering solutions that reduce dependency on specific catalyst chemistries.
Strategic company-level insights on capability differentiation, portfolio tactics, collaborative models and competitive positioning across catalyst producers
Company-level dynamics center on how organizations differentiate through technology, manufacturing scale, service capabilities and collaborative models. Leading catalyst producers combine proprietary synthesis methods, rigorous quality control, and service offerings such as on-site performance monitoring and regeneration to deliver differentiated value propositions. Competitive positioning is often determined by the ability to offer end-to-end solutions that reduce total cost of ownership for refiners-this includes extended life formulations, rapid turnaround support, and analytic services that translate performance data into actionable process recommendations.
Partnerships between catalyst firms and technology providers or system integrators have become more common, enabling integrated offerings that combine material innovation with digital diagnostics. These alliances help bridge gaps in capability by pairing advanced active phases or supports with process modeling and predictive analytics, which in turn improves asset utilization and reduces unplanned outages. Investment in sustainable practices, including reclamation and metal recovery programs, is also a differentiator, as customers increasingly evaluate suppliers on environmental credentials and cradle-to-cradle commitments as part of procurement assessments.
Practical recommendations for industry leaders to optimize catalyst sourcing, improve process efficiency, mitigate regulatory risk and advance sustainability
Industry leaders should adopt a set of prioritized actions that align short-term operational needs with longer-term strategic resilience. First, optimizing sourcing strategies to include dual sourcing and validated alternative suppliers reduces single-point supply risk while preserving access to specialized materials. Second, investing in in-house regeneration and recovery capabilities for precious and rare earth metals can materially improve resource efficiency and reduce exposure to external price or trade shocks. Third, integrating digital performance monitoring and predictive maintenance into catalyst management supports condition-based interventions that extend on-stream life and improve planning for turnarounds.
Leaders should also emphasize collaborative R&D and co-development with catalyst providers to tailor solutions for unique feedstock and process conditions, thereby unlocking performance gains and mitigating compatibility risk. Finally, embedding sustainability metrics into procurement and lifecycle assessments-such as end-of-life recovery rates and carbon intensity of manufacturing-will increasingly align operational decisions with stakeholder expectations and regulatory direction, and will support access to strategic partnerships and financing tools tied to environmental performance.
Transparent research methodology explaining data sources, primary and secondary approaches, analytical frameworks, validation processes and quality control
This research draws on an integrated methodology combining structured primary engagement with industry practitioners, technical literature review, and systematic synthesis of operational best practices. Primary inputs included interviews with refining engineers, procurement leads and catalyst scientists to capture real-world constraints around feedstock variability, turnaround planning and supplier performance. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed journals, industry whitepapers, patent filings and regulatory documentation to establish a technical baseline for catalyst chemistries, regeneration techniques and environmental compliance requirements.
Analytical frameworks employed include cross-sectional mapping of material properties to application requirements, supply chain stress-testing scenarios, and qualitative benchmarking of company capabilities. Validation processes incorporated triangulation across independent sources and iterative review with subject-matter experts to ensure fidelity of technical interpretations and to reduce bias. Quality control measures encompassed source verification, reproducibility checks for technical assertions, and documentation of assumptions underlying any comparative assessments that inform strategic recommendations.
Conclusive synthesis summarizing strategic imperatives, resilient pathways, and priority focus areas for stakeholders navigating catalyst innovation and complexity
The conclusion synthesizes the essential imperatives for stakeholders navigating the evolving catalyst environment: prioritize resilience in sourcing, invest in technologies that extend performance under variable feedstock conditions, and adopt collaborative models that combine material innovation with digital process intelligence. Resilience is not solely a procurement concern but a cross-functional objective that requires alignment across R&D, operations and commercial teams to manage trade-offs between upfront cost and lifecycle value.
Sustainable practices and reclamation programs will increasingly shape supplier selection and regulatory compliance, and organizations that proactively embed circularity into catalyst strategy will reduce long-term exposure to supply disruptions and material constraints. Ultimately, a strategic posture that balances tactical operational optimization with longer-term investments in capability, partnerships and sustainability will position stakeholders to capture opportunities and manage risks as the industry continues to transform.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive overview of refinery catalyst landscape highlighting material innovations, operational imperatives, sustainability drivers and regulatory pressures
The refinery catalysts landscape is at the confluence of technological innovation, evolving feedstock profiles, regulatory change and intensifying pressure to reduce environmental impacts. In recent years, refiners and catalyst suppliers have had to adapt simultaneously to shifts in crude characteristics, demands for lighter and cleaner fuels, and the rising need to integrate circular economy principles. Within that context, material science advances-spanning chemical supports, metal active phases, and engineered zeolites-are driving new trade-offs between activity, selectivity, longevity and cost of ownership.
Transitioning operational paradigms, from batch adjustments to continuous process optimization, is now a strategic priority for operators seeking to preserve margins while meeting stricter emissions and product quality standards. This introduction frames the core dynamics that decision-makers must consider: the interplay between catalyst formulation and process architecture, procurement complexity tied to specialized raw materials, and the growing influence of policy and sustainability imperatives. The following analysis unpacks these drivers and their implications for sourcing strategies, process upgrades and collaborative innovation agendas among producers and technology providers.
Emerging technological and policy shifts redefining catalyst selection, process integration, feedstock strategies and digital enablement across refineries
The industry is experiencing transformative shifts that affect how catalysts are designed, procured and deployed across refining operations. Advances in precision synthesis and characterization enable tailored active site architectures and support morphologies that increase tolerance to contaminants and extend on-stream life. Concurrently, digitalization is reshaping process monitoring and predictive maintenance, allowing catalyst performance to be assessed in near real time and enabling condition-based regeneration and replacement strategies. These technological developments reduce unexpected downtime and permit refiners to extract greater value from higher-cost, higher-performance catalyst formulations.
Policy-driven transitions are exerting parallel pressure: tighter emissions requirements, evolving fuel specifications, and incentives for lower-carbon pathways compel refiners to re-evaluate catalyst lifecycles and end-of-life handling. Feedstock volatility has encouraged flexible catalyst platforms capable of operating across varying crude slates and blended streams. At the same time, supply chain dynamics have shifted sourcing priorities toward resilience and supplier diversification, prompting longer-term supplier partnerships and localized inventory strategies. The combined effect is a redefinition of the competitive landscape in which material innovation, digital enablement, and procurement resilience determine who can respond most effectively to rapid change.
Analysis of cumulative effects from United States tariffs in 2025 on catalyst supply chains, trade flows, procurement strategies and domestic competitiveness
The introduction of tariffs by the United States in 2025 has created a set of cumulative effects that propagate through the catalyst ecosystem, influencing supply chain architecture, procurement behavior, and strategic sourcing decisions. Tariff-imposed cost differentials have made reliance on a narrow set of international suppliers less tenable, prompting both buyers and suppliers to reassess total landed cost, lead time risk, and inventory strategies. In many instances, this has accelerated conversations around nearshoring, dual sourcing and vertical integration as mechanisms to reduce exposure to trade friction.
Beyond procurement, the tariff environment has driven refiners to evaluate formulation flexibility, seeking catalyst systems that can be sourced from multiple suppliers or that rely more heavily on commoditized support materials. Where certain high-performance metal phases became subject to tighter import taxes or quotas, organizations prioritized process-side adjustments to reduce metal loading without compromising conversion targets, and invested in regeneration and reclamation capabilities to recover critical elements. Moreover, the regulatory signal from tariffs has motivated dialogues between industry and policymakers regarding strategic domestic capabilities for key catalyst materials, and has highlighted the importance of supply chain transparency, traceability and secure logistics to ensure continuity of operations.
Insightful segmentation analysis revealing how catalyst types, application pathways and end user industry profiles intersect to influence performance and sourcing decisions
A nuanced view of segmentation reveals distinct technical and commercial considerations across catalyst type, application domain and end user industry. When considering types, chemical compound supports such as alumina and silica present different mechanical strengths, acid-base properties and thermal stability that govern their suitability for various processes; metal catalysts subdivide into precious metals, rare earth metals and transition and base metals, each delivering unique activity profiles and cost structures; zeolites exist as natural and synthetic variants with tunable pore structures and ion-exchange capacities that inform selectivity and regeneration behavior. These material-level distinctions interact with application demands: alkylation, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrocracking and isomerization each impose differentiated requirements for acidity, metal dispersion and thermal resistance, and within those domains sub-applications such as diesel production versus gasoline production in fluid catalytic cracking, or middle distillates versus naphtha in hydrocracking, create further specificity in catalyst design.
End user industry orientation further frames value metrics and procurement priorities. Chemical manufacturing units typically emphasize catalytic selectivity and downstream purity to meet tightly controlled reaction networks, whereas fuel additives manufacturers prioritize active phases that deliver consistent octane or anti-knock performance and that integrate well with blending operations; oil and gas refineries evaluate catalysts through the lens of cycle life, turnaround intervals and compatibility with existing reactor internals. Within fuel additives, differentiation between anti-knocking agents and octane enhancers shapes supplier selection, regulatory compliance approaches and the emphasis placed on reclaiming valuable metals. Taken together, segmentation highlights why a one-size-fits-all approach is suboptimal and why cross-functional assessments-linking R&D, operations and procurement-are essential for selecting the right catalyst architecture for each operational footprint.
Regional insights synthesizing demand, supply chain resilience, regulatory trends and investment appetite across Americas, EMEA and APAC markets
Regional dynamics manifest through regulatory regimes, feedstock characteristics, infrastructure maturity and capital allocation preferences, producing distinct strategic priorities across the global landscape. In the Americas, emphasis commonly falls on upgrading existing refinery assets to meet evolving fuel quality standards and on securing resilient supply chains for critical catalyst components, with procurement strategies reflecting a balance between cost management and operational continuity. Europe, Middle East & Africa combines mature regulatory frameworks in some markets with rapid capacity additions and feedstock variability in others, driving heterogeneous requirements for catalyst performance and lifecycle services and encouraging modular, adaptable solutions.
Asia-Pacific presents a differentiated picture characterized by accelerating refining capacity, varied crude sources and a growing appetite for technology partnerships that embed local manufacturing, service capabilities and knowledge transfer. Across these regions, investment appetite and regulatory pressure shape local industry responses: some markets prioritize emission reduction and decarbonization roadmaps, while others emphasize throughput and product slate optimization. The interaction between regional policy, infrastructure readiness and supplier footprint frequently determines whether refiners pursue on-site regeneration, long-term vendor-managed inventory, or engineering solutions that reduce dependency on specific catalyst chemistries.
Strategic company-level insights on capability differentiation, portfolio tactics, collaborative models and competitive positioning across catalyst producers
Company-level dynamics center on how organizations differentiate through technology, manufacturing scale, service capabilities and collaborative models. Leading catalyst producers combine proprietary synthesis methods, rigorous quality control, and service offerings such as on-site performance monitoring and regeneration to deliver differentiated value propositions. Competitive positioning is often determined by the ability to offer end-to-end solutions that reduce total cost of ownership for refiners-this includes extended life formulations, rapid turnaround support, and analytic services that translate performance data into actionable process recommendations.
Partnerships between catalyst firms and technology providers or system integrators have become more common, enabling integrated offerings that combine material innovation with digital diagnostics. These alliances help bridge gaps in capability by pairing advanced active phases or supports with process modeling and predictive analytics, which in turn improves asset utilization and reduces unplanned outages. Investment in sustainable practices, including reclamation and metal recovery programs, is also a differentiator, as customers increasingly evaluate suppliers on environmental credentials and cradle-to-cradle commitments as part of procurement assessments.
Practical recommendations for industry leaders to optimize catalyst sourcing, improve process efficiency, mitigate regulatory risk and advance sustainability
Industry leaders should adopt a set of prioritized actions that align short-term operational needs with longer-term strategic resilience. First, optimizing sourcing strategies to include dual sourcing and validated alternative suppliers reduces single-point supply risk while preserving access to specialized materials. Second, investing in in-house regeneration and recovery capabilities for precious and rare earth metals can materially improve resource efficiency and reduce exposure to external price or trade shocks. Third, integrating digital performance monitoring and predictive maintenance into catalyst management supports condition-based interventions that extend on-stream life and improve planning for turnarounds.
Leaders should also emphasize collaborative R&D and co-development with catalyst providers to tailor solutions for unique feedstock and process conditions, thereby unlocking performance gains and mitigating compatibility risk. Finally, embedding sustainability metrics into procurement and lifecycle assessments-such as end-of-life recovery rates and carbon intensity of manufacturing-will increasingly align operational decisions with stakeholder expectations and regulatory direction, and will support access to strategic partnerships and financing tools tied to environmental performance.
Transparent research methodology explaining data sources, primary and secondary approaches, analytical frameworks, validation processes and quality control
This research draws on an integrated methodology combining structured primary engagement with industry practitioners, technical literature review, and systematic synthesis of operational best practices. Primary inputs included interviews with refining engineers, procurement leads and catalyst scientists to capture real-world constraints around feedstock variability, turnaround planning and supplier performance. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed journals, industry whitepapers, patent filings and regulatory documentation to establish a technical baseline for catalyst chemistries, regeneration techniques and environmental compliance requirements.
Analytical frameworks employed include cross-sectional mapping of material properties to application requirements, supply chain stress-testing scenarios, and qualitative benchmarking of company capabilities. Validation processes incorporated triangulation across independent sources and iterative review with subject-matter experts to ensure fidelity of technical interpretations and to reduce bias. Quality control measures encompassed source verification, reproducibility checks for technical assertions, and documentation of assumptions underlying any comparative assessments that inform strategic recommendations.
Conclusive synthesis summarizing strategic imperatives, resilient pathways, and priority focus areas for stakeholders navigating catalyst innovation and complexity
The conclusion synthesizes the essential imperatives for stakeholders navigating the evolving catalyst environment: prioritize resilience in sourcing, invest in technologies that extend performance under variable feedstock conditions, and adopt collaborative models that combine material innovation with digital process intelligence. Resilience is not solely a procurement concern but a cross-functional objective that requires alignment across R&D, operations and commercial teams to manage trade-offs between upfront cost and lifecycle value.
Sustainable practices and reclamation programs will increasingly shape supplier selection and regulatory compliance, and organizations that proactively embed circularity into catalyst strategy will reduce long-term exposure to supply disruptions and material constraints. Ultimately, a strategic posture that balances tactical operational optimization with longer-term investments in capability, partnerships and sustainability will position stakeholders to capture opportunities and manage risks as the industry continues to transform.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Accelerating adoption of low global warming potential refrigerants in commercial HVAC systems
- 5.2. Increasing use of carbon dioxide transcritical refrigeration systems in supermarket chains
- 5.3. Growing implementation of hydrofluoroolefin refrigerants in automotive air conditioning applications
- 5.4. Emerging development of advanced leak detection solutions using IoT sensors for refrigerant loss prevention
- 5.5. Regulatory phase down of high GWP HFCs spurring retrofitting of residential air conditioners with new refrigerants
- 5.6. Increasing preference for hydrocarbon refrigerant blends in small commercial refrigeration for environmental compliance
- 5.7. Global supply chain disruptions driving price volatility and shortages of key refrigerants across regions
- 5.8. Novel development of low charge ammonia systems improving safety and efficiency in industrial applications
- 5.9. Expansion of refrigerant reclamation and recycling services driven by tightening disposal regulations worldwide
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Refrigerants Market, by Refrigerant Type
- 8.1. Fluorinated Refrigerants
- 8.1.1. Chlorofluorocarbons
- 8.1.2. Hydrochlorofluorocarbons
- 8.1.3. Hydrofluorocarbons
- 8.1.4. Hydrofluoroolefins
- 8.2. Natural Refrigerants
- 8.2.1. Ammonia
- 8.2.2. Carbon Dioxide
- 8.2.3. Hydrocarbons
- 8.2.3.1. Butane
- 8.2.3.2. Propane
- 8.2.4. Water
- 9. Refrigerants Market, by Blend Type
- 9.1. Azeotropic Mixtures
- 9.2. Zeotropic Mixtures
- 10. Refrigerants Market, by Form
- 10.1. Gas
- 10.2. Liquid
- 11. Refrigerants Market, by Application
- 11.1. Air Conditioning System
- 11.1.1. Ducted
- 11.1.2. Ductless
- 11.2. Chillers
- 11.3. Fire Protection
- 11.4. Foam Blowing Agents
- 11.5. Heat Pumps
- 11.6. Refrigeration System
- 11.7. Solvents
- 12. Refrigerants Market, by Distribution Channels
- 12.1. Direct Sales
- 12.2. Distributors
- 12.3. Online Sales
- 13. Refrigerants Market, by End Use
- 13.1. Commercial
- 13.1.1. Data Centers
- 13.1.2. Healthcare
- 13.1.3. Hospitality
- 13.1.4. Retail
- 13.2. Domestic
- 13.3. Industrial
- 13.3.1. Chemical
- 13.3.2. Food Processing
- 13.3.3. Petrochemical
- 14. Refrigerants Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Refrigerants Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Refrigerants Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. BASF SE
- 17.3.2. Arkema S.A.
- 17.3.3. AGC Inc
- 17.3.4. A‑Gas International Limited
- 17.3.5. Beijing Starget Group
- 17.3.6. ComStar International Inc.
- 17.3.7. Daikin Industries, Ltd.
- 17.3.8. Danfoss A/S
- 17.3.9. DONGYUE GROUP LIMITED
- 17.3.10. Engas Pty Ltd.
- 17.3.11. GAS SERVEI, S.A.
- 17.3.12. Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited
- 17.3.13. Gupta Oxygen Pvt. Ltd
- 17.3.14. Harp International Ltd
- 17.3.15. Honeywell International Inc.
- 17.3.16. HyChill Australia
- 17.3.17. Linde PLC
- 17.3.18. Linhai Limin Chemicals Co., Ltd
- 17.3.19. L’AIR LIQUIDE S.A.
- 17.3.20. MexFluor India Pvt. Ltd.
- 17.3.21. Navin Fluorine International Limited
- 17.3.22. Orbia Advance Corporation S.A.B. de CV
- 17.3.23. Puyang Zhongwei Fine Chemical Co., Ltd
- 17.3.24. Refex Industries Limited
- 17.3.25. Shandong Yuean Chemical Industry Co., Ltd
- 17.3.26. SINOCHEM GROUP CO., LTD.
- 17.3.27. SRF Limited
- 17.3.28. Tazzetti S.p.A.
- 17.3.29. The Chemours Company LLC
- 17.3.30. Yingpeng Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.31. Zhejiang Fotech International Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.32. Zhejiang MR Refrigerant Co.,LTD.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
