Polyurethanes Market by Material Type (Polyester, Polyether), Form (Dispersion, Liquid, Solid), Application, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Polyurethanes Market was valued at USD 82.43 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 86.87 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.31%, reaching USD 124.75 billion by 2032.
Framing the contemporary polyurethane landscape with supply-chain, regulatory, and innovation context to inform strategic decisions across manufacturing and end-use sectors
This executive summary opens with a clear framing of the contemporary polyurethane landscape and the forces shaping near-term strategic choices for manufacturers, converters, and end users. The industry sits at the intersection of accelerating sustainability expectations, novel feedstock economics, and evolving end-use demands, creating both competitive pressure and opportunity for those that move decisively. By synthesizing supply-chain dynamics, technology trajectories, regulatory shifts, and commercial behavior, this overview equips leadership with the context needed to prioritize investments and risk-mitigation actions.
Through a disciplined lens, the report examines how upstream monomer sourcing, catalyst and additive innovation, and downstream formulation shifts are affecting product portfolios and customer value propositions. Complementary perspectives on capital deployment, partnerships, and talent strategies reveal where incumbents can play defense and where newcomers can exploit white space. The narrative that follows links these strategic trends to operational levers-procurement choices, manufacturing footprint decisions, and channel management-so that readers can translate insight into measurable plans.
Understanding the converging waves of sustainability, feedstock diversification, regulation, and digital transformation that are remapping competitive advantage in polyurethane value chains
The landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by sustainability imperatives, feedstock innovation, and digital enablement, with each vector reinforcing the others and reshaping competitive positioning. First, there is a clear directional shift toward lower-carbon chemistries and circular approaches. Bio-based polyols, chemical recycling pathways, and formulations designed for disassembly are moving from pilot projects to commercial-scale commitments, changing both raw material specifications and downstream product claims. As a result, formulators and converters are rethinking sourcing strategies, quality control protocols, and certification pathways to support customer demands for traceability and environmental performance.
Simultaneously, volatility in petrochemical feedstock pricing has prompted manufacturers to pursue diversification of supply and localized value chains, accelerating investments in regional production or alternative raw materials. This economic pressure is compounded by stricter regulatory requirements on emissions and product stewardship in multiple jurisdictions, which in turn raises compliance and reporting obligations for both producers and customers. Finally, the integration of digital tools-ranging from predictive maintenance on manufacturing equipment to advanced analytics for formulation optimization-has improved operational resilience and reduced time-to-market for new grades. Taken together, these shifts are not incremental; they are reconfiguring where value accrues in the value chain and which capabilities differentiate winners from laggards.
Assessing how evolving U.S. tariff measures have reshaped procurement, supplier networks, and strategic localization choices across polyurethane supply chains
Recent tariff adjustments implemented in the United States have had a cumulative effect on procurement strategies, supplier relationships, and sourcing geographies across the polyurethane ecosystem. Tariff policy has altered landed costs and compelled many purchasers to reassess long-standing supplier agreements in favor of either onshoring, nearshoring, or multi-sourcing arrangements. In response, certain manufacturers have accelerated localization of intermediates or finished goods to insulate margins and service levels from trade-related variability. Over time, this reconfiguration influences capital allocation decisions, as companies weigh the trade-offs between scale economics and supply-chain agility.
Moreover, tariffs have magnified the importance of supply-chain transparency and trade-compliance capabilities. Firms that invested in deeper visibility across their procurement network have managed disruption more effectively by identifying alternative routes and leveraging tariff mitigation strategies such as tariff engineering, advance ruling documentation, and contract reformation. At the same time, tariff-driven cost pressures have increased the focus on downstream value capture through product differentiation, formulation premiuming, and service-oriented offerings. Looking ahead, persistent trade policy uncertainty will continue to favor organizations that combine flexible sourcing, strategic inventory positioning, and strong regulatory affairs capabilities to preserve competitiveness when cross-border costs fluctuate.
Cross-cutting segmentation analysis linking application, chemistry, end-use sector, and product form to reveal where formulation and process investments create the greatest strategic lift
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated opportunity pockets that depend on application, material chemistry, end-use context, and physical form factors. Based on Application, the market is studied across Adhesives & Sealants, Coatings, Elastomers, Flexible Foam, and Rigid Foam, and each application presents unique formulation constraints, performance priorities, and customer purchasing behaviors; for instance, coatings and adhesives place premium emphasis on cure kinetics and VOC profiles, whereas flexible foam emphasizes resilience, cost-per-seat, and comfort properties. Based on Material Type, the market is studied across Polyester and Polyether, which exhibit divergent property sets and raw material sensitivities-polyester systems often offer higher thermal and solvent resistance while polyether systems provide hydrolytic stability and lower-temperature flexibility, creating distinct fit-for-use decisions for product developers.
Based on End Use, the market is studied across Automotive & Transportation, Building & Construction, Electronics, Footwear & Apparel, Furniture & Flooring, and Medical & Healthcare, and demand drivers vary markedly across these segments; automotive trends toward electrification and lightweighting alter foam density and adhesive performance requirements, while medical applications prioritize biocompatibility and sterility assurance. Based on Form, the market is studied across Dispersion, Liquid, and Solid, with the Dispersion category further studied across Aqueous Dispersion and Solvent-based Dispersion, and form factor influences handling, shelf life, and processing capital needs-aqueous dispersions reduce VOC exposure and enable new application methods, whereas solvent-based systems can offer performance trade-offs that remain relevant where drying speed and substrate wetting are critical. By interrelating application, chemistry, end use, and form, companies can pinpoint where incremental formulation improvements yield disproportionate commercial returns and where platform investments will unlock adjacent segments.
Mapping how distinct regional drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific determine sourcing, production footprints, and product pathways
Regional dynamics are shaping competitive strategies as supply, demand, and regulation diverge by geography. In the Americas, manufacturers contend with a focus on resilient supply chains and nearshoring, supported by a strong industrial base and demand from automotive and construction sectors; this creates opportunities for scale players that can offer rapid lead times and integrated service models. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory pressure on circularity and emissions, combined with established chemical manufacturing clusters, is driving advanced recycling pilots and stricter product stewardship, prompting industry participants to prioritize sustainability credentials and certification pathways. Conversely, in the Middle East, feedstock access and petrochemical integration continue to support commodity production economics, enabling investment in downstream capacity when global demand conditions justify expansion.
In the Asia-Pacific region, dynamic manufacturing growth, rapid urbanization, and concentration of electronics and consumer goods production sustain diverse demand patterns, while government-led initiatives to reduce pollution and increase recycling are accelerating transitions in formulation and waste management practices. Supply-chain considerations differ meaningfully across these regions, influencing where companies site production, how they design distribution networks, and which product variants they commercialize locally versus globally. Integrating regional regulatory foresight with local market intelligence is therefore essential to designing a footprint that balances cost, compliance, and customer responsiveness.
Evaluating how capability-driven competition, strategic partnerships, and targeted vertical integration are defining leadership in polyurethane innovation and commercialization
Competitive dynamics among leading firms are increasingly defined by capability stacks rather than single-product advantages. Companies investing in application-driven R&D, pilot-scale recycling infrastructure, and partnerships with feedstock innovators tend to move faster from concept to commercial launch. Strategic collaborations with OEMs and brand owners help prioritize performance attributes that command premium positioning, while vertical integration into intermediate chemistries provides cost resilience when input markets tighten. At the same time, specialist players focusing on niche formulations or high-value service models sustain differentiation by offering technical support, customized R&D, and formulation licensing that reduce time-to-spec for customers.
Additionally, M&A activity and strategic alliances continue to shape capability maps, enabling faster access to new chemistries or regional distribution networks. Companies that pair innovation pipelines with disciplined commercialization processes-clear go/no-go gates, pilot-to-scale roadmaps, and customer co-development contracts-outperform peers in launching durable product families. Finally, leadership in compliance, sustainable sourcing certifications, and transparent reporting provides reputational advantage in supply chains increasingly driven by corporate responsibility procurement criteria, thereby strengthening long-term commercial relationships.
Concrete strategic and operational actions executives should deploy now to build resilience, capture premium opportunities, and accelerate sustainable innovation across the value chain
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions that accelerate resilience, unlock new revenue streams, and lower transitional risk. First, diversify feedstock sourcing and qualify alternative chemistries to reduce exposure to single-origin volatility and to support low-carbon product variants; concurrently, invest in pilot recycling and chemical reclamation projects that can be scaled in partnership with waste-handling firms and converters. Second, reconfigure supply-chain contracts to include flexibility clauses and multi-sourcing provisions while expanding regional warehousing to improve responsiveness during cross-border disruption. Third, prioritize product tiers where formulation improvements deliver measurable customer value and attach service offerings-technical support, application trials, and warranty structures-that convert performance into premium pricing.
Fourth, embed sustainability metrics into R&D and procurement decisions to accelerate compliance readiness where regulations are tightening, and use these metrics as commercial differentiators in tender processes. Fifth, accelerate digital adoption across manufacturing and commercialization functions by deploying predictive maintenance, formulation simulation tools, and customer insight platforms to shorten development cycles and improve yield. Sixth, build partnerships with downstream customers and academic centers to co-develop solutions that meet application-specific constraints while sharing development risk. Executed together, these actions reduce exposure to trade and feedstock volatility, strengthen customer ties, and position firms to capture advantages as industry structures evolve.
Explaining a rigorous mixed-methods research approach that integrates expert interviews, technical literature, trade-flow analysis, and scenario testing to validate strategic insights
The research approach combined primary engagement with industry participants and structured secondary analysis to ensure a robust, evidence-based perspective. Primary inputs included interviews with senior leaders across manufacturing, conversion, and end-user procurement, structured technical discussions with formulation scientists and process engineers, and consultations with regulatory affairs specialists to validate compliance trajectories. These conversations provided qualitative color on capability gaps, investment priorities, and adoption timelines, and they were triangulated against public company disclosures and trade flows observed in customs and logistics datasets.
Secondary analysis focused on technology patents, material science literature, environmental regulation text, and corporate sustainability reports to map innovation pathways and compliance drivers. Segmentation and scenario work included sensitivity checks against multiple feedstock and tariff permutations to assess operational trade-offs. Quality control processes included cross-validation of claims with multiple independent sources, expert peer review of technical conclusions, and documentation of assumptions and limitations to support transparent interpretation by decision-makers. This methodological rigor ensures that the conclusions reflect both on-the-ground realities and systemic trends rather than isolated anecdotes.
Summarizing strategic imperatives and the integrated operational priorities required to convert disruption into competitive advantage across polyurethane businesses
In conclusion, the polyurethane sector stands at an inflection point characterized by intersecting pressures from sustainability expectations, trade policy shifts, and technological change. Companies that proactively diversify feedstocks, invest in circular pathways, and strengthen supply-chain visibility will be better positioned to manage volatility and to extract higher value from differentiated products. At the same time, those that neglect regulatory foresight or delay digital and process investments risk being outcompeted on both cost and performance metrics. The most effective strategies will be those that align commercialization priorities with operational capability-linking R&D roadmaps to manufacturing scale, and tying procurement flexibility to customer service models.
Leaders should therefore prioritize cross-functional programs that connect market intelligence, product development, and supply-chain execution. By doing so, they can convert near-term disruptions into strategic advantages, securing stronger customer relationships and more resilient margins as the market evolves. The insights in the full study provide the supporting detail necessary to translate these strategic priorities into tactical plans and investment decisions.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the contemporary polyurethane landscape with supply-chain, regulatory, and innovation context to inform strategic decisions across manufacturing and end-use sectors
This executive summary opens with a clear framing of the contemporary polyurethane landscape and the forces shaping near-term strategic choices for manufacturers, converters, and end users. The industry sits at the intersection of accelerating sustainability expectations, novel feedstock economics, and evolving end-use demands, creating both competitive pressure and opportunity for those that move decisively. By synthesizing supply-chain dynamics, technology trajectories, regulatory shifts, and commercial behavior, this overview equips leadership with the context needed to prioritize investments and risk-mitigation actions.
Through a disciplined lens, the report examines how upstream monomer sourcing, catalyst and additive innovation, and downstream formulation shifts are affecting product portfolios and customer value propositions. Complementary perspectives on capital deployment, partnerships, and talent strategies reveal where incumbents can play defense and where newcomers can exploit white space. The narrative that follows links these strategic trends to operational levers-procurement choices, manufacturing footprint decisions, and channel management-so that readers can translate insight into measurable plans.
Understanding the converging waves of sustainability, feedstock diversification, regulation, and digital transformation that are remapping competitive advantage in polyurethane value chains
The landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by sustainability imperatives, feedstock innovation, and digital enablement, with each vector reinforcing the others and reshaping competitive positioning. First, there is a clear directional shift toward lower-carbon chemistries and circular approaches. Bio-based polyols, chemical recycling pathways, and formulations designed for disassembly are moving from pilot projects to commercial-scale commitments, changing both raw material specifications and downstream product claims. As a result, formulators and converters are rethinking sourcing strategies, quality control protocols, and certification pathways to support customer demands for traceability and environmental performance.
Simultaneously, volatility in petrochemical feedstock pricing has prompted manufacturers to pursue diversification of supply and localized value chains, accelerating investments in regional production or alternative raw materials. This economic pressure is compounded by stricter regulatory requirements on emissions and product stewardship in multiple jurisdictions, which in turn raises compliance and reporting obligations for both producers and customers. Finally, the integration of digital tools-ranging from predictive maintenance on manufacturing equipment to advanced analytics for formulation optimization-has improved operational resilience and reduced time-to-market for new grades. Taken together, these shifts are not incremental; they are reconfiguring where value accrues in the value chain and which capabilities differentiate winners from laggards.
Assessing how evolving U.S. tariff measures have reshaped procurement, supplier networks, and strategic localization choices across polyurethane supply chains
Recent tariff adjustments implemented in the United States have had a cumulative effect on procurement strategies, supplier relationships, and sourcing geographies across the polyurethane ecosystem. Tariff policy has altered landed costs and compelled many purchasers to reassess long-standing supplier agreements in favor of either onshoring, nearshoring, or multi-sourcing arrangements. In response, certain manufacturers have accelerated localization of intermediates or finished goods to insulate margins and service levels from trade-related variability. Over time, this reconfiguration influences capital allocation decisions, as companies weigh the trade-offs between scale economics and supply-chain agility.
Moreover, tariffs have magnified the importance of supply-chain transparency and trade-compliance capabilities. Firms that invested in deeper visibility across their procurement network have managed disruption more effectively by identifying alternative routes and leveraging tariff mitigation strategies such as tariff engineering, advance ruling documentation, and contract reformation. At the same time, tariff-driven cost pressures have increased the focus on downstream value capture through product differentiation, formulation premiuming, and service-oriented offerings. Looking ahead, persistent trade policy uncertainty will continue to favor organizations that combine flexible sourcing, strategic inventory positioning, and strong regulatory affairs capabilities to preserve competitiveness when cross-border costs fluctuate.
Cross-cutting segmentation analysis linking application, chemistry, end-use sector, and product form to reveal where formulation and process investments create the greatest strategic lift
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated opportunity pockets that depend on application, material chemistry, end-use context, and physical form factors. Based on Application, the market is studied across Adhesives & Sealants, Coatings, Elastomers, Flexible Foam, and Rigid Foam, and each application presents unique formulation constraints, performance priorities, and customer purchasing behaviors; for instance, coatings and adhesives place premium emphasis on cure kinetics and VOC profiles, whereas flexible foam emphasizes resilience, cost-per-seat, and comfort properties. Based on Material Type, the market is studied across Polyester and Polyether, which exhibit divergent property sets and raw material sensitivities-polyester systems often offer higher thermal and solvent resistance while polyether systems provide hydrolytic stability and lower-temperature flexibility, creating distinct fit-for-use decisions for product developers.
Based on End Use, the market is studied across Automotive & Transportation, Building & Construction, Electronics, Footwear & Apparel, Furniture & Flooring, and Medical & Healthcare, and demand drivers vary markedly across these segments; automotive trends toward electrification and lightweighting alter foam density and adhesive performance requirements, while medical applications prioritize biocompatibility and sterility assurance. Based on Form, the market is studied across Dispersion, Liquid, and Solid, with the Dispersion category further studied across Aqueous Dispersion and Solvent-based Dispersion, and form factor influences handling, shelf life, and processing capital needs-aqueous dispersions reduce VOC exposure and enable new application methods, whereas solvent-based systems can offer performance trade-offs that remain relevant where drying speed and substrate wetting are critical. By interrelating application, chemistry, end use, and form, companies can pinpoint where incremental formulation improvements yield disproportionate commercial returns and where platform investments will unlock adjacent segments.
Mapping how distinct regional drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific determine sourcing, production footprints, and product pathways
Regional dynamics are shaping competitive strategies as supply, demand, and regulation diverge by geography. In the Americas, manufacturers contend with a focus on resilient supply chains and nearshoring, supported by a strong industrial base and demand from automotive and construction sectors; this creates opportunities for scale players that can offer rapid lead times and integrated service models. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory pressure on circularity and emissions, combined with established chemical manufacturing clusters, is driving advanced recycling pilots and stricter product stewardship, prompting industry participants to prioritize sustainability credentials and certification pathways. Conversely, in the Middle East, feedstock access and petrochemical integration continue to support commodity production economics, enabling investment in downstream capacity when global demand conditions justify expansion.
In the Asia-Pacific region, dynamic manufacturing growth, rapid urbanization, and concentration of electronics and consumer goods production sustain diverse demand patterns, while government-led initiatives to reduce pollution and increase recycling are accelerating transitions in formulation and waste management practices. Supply-chain considerations differ meaningfully across these regions, influencing where companies site production, how they design distribution networks, and which product variants they commercialize locally versus globally. Integrating regional regulatory foresight with local market intelligence is therefore essential to designing a footprint that balances cost, compliance, and customer responsiveness.
Evaluating how capability-driven competition, strategic partnerships, and targeted vertical integration are defining leadership in polyurethane innovation and commercialization
Competitive dynamics among leading firms are increasingly defined by capability stacks rather than single-product advantages. Companies investing in application-driven R&D, pilot-scale recycling infrastructure, and partnerships with feedstock innovators tend to move faster from concept to commercial launch. Strategic collaborations with OEMs and brand owners help prioritize performance attributes that command premium positioning, while vertical integration into intermediate chemistries provides cost resilience when input markets tighten. At the same time, specialist players focusing on niche formulations or high-value service models sustain differentiation by offering technical support, customized R&D, and formulation licensing that reduce time-to-spec for customers.
Additionally, M&A activity and strategic alliances continue to shape capability maps, enabling faster access to new chemistries or regional distribution networks. Companies that pair innovation pipelines with disciplined commercialization processes-clear go/no-go gates, pilot-to-scale roadmaps, and customer co-development contracts-outperform peers in launching durable product families. Finally, leadership in compliance, sustainable sourcing certifications, and transparent reporting provides reputational advantage in supply chains increasingly driven by corporate responsibility procurement criteria, thereby strengthening long-term commercial relationships.
Concrete strategic and operational actions executives should deploy now to build resilience, capture premium opportunities, and accelerate sustainable innovation across the value chain
Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic actions that accelerate resilience, unlock new revenue streams, and lower transitional risk. First, diversify feedstock sourcing and qualify alternative chemistries to reduce exposure to single-origin volatility and to support low-carbon product variants; concurrently, invest in pilot recycling and chemical reclamation projects that can be scaled in partnership with waste-handling firms and converters. Second, reconfigure supply-chain contracts to include flexibility clauses and multi-sourcing provisions while expanding regional warehousing to improve responsiveness during cross-border disruption. Third, prioritize product tiers where formulation improvements deliver measurable customer value and attach service offerings-technical support, application trials, and warranty structures-that convert performance into premium pricing.
Fourth, embed sustainability metrics into R&D and procurement decisions to accelerate compliance readiness where regulations are tightening, and use these metrics as commercial differentiators in tender processes. Fifth, accelerate digital adoption across manufacturing and commercialization functions by deploying predictive maintenance, formulation simulation tools, and customer insight platforms to shorten development cycles and improve yield. Sixth, build partnerships with downstream customers and academic centers to co-develop solutions that meet application-specific constraints while sharing development risk. Executed together, these actions reduce exposure to trade and feedstock volatility, strengthen customer ties, and position firms to capture advantages as industry structures evolve.
Explaining a rigorous mixed-methods research approach that integrates expert interviews, technical literature, trade-flow analysis, and scenario testing to validate strategic insights
The research approach combined primary engagement with industry participants and structured secondary analysis to ensure a robust, evidence-based perspective. Primary inputs included interviews with senior leaders across manufacturing, conversion, and end-user procurement, structured technical discussions with formulation scientists and process engineers, and consultations with regulatory affairs specialists to validate compliance trajectories. These conversations provided qualitative color on capability gaps, investment priorities, and adoption timelines, and they were triangulated against public company disclosures and trade flows observed in customs and logistics datasets.
Secondary analysis focused on technology patents, material science literature, environmental regulation text, and corporate sustainability reports to map innovation pathways and compliance drivers. Segmentation and scenario work included sensitivity checks against multiple feedstock and tariff permutations to assess operational trade-offs. Quality control processes included cross-validation of claims with multiple independent sources, expert peer review of technical conclusions, and documentation of assumptions and limitations to support transparent interpretation by decision-makers. This methodological rigor ensures that the conclusions reflect both on-the-ground realities and systemic trends rather than isolated anecdotes.
Summarizing strategic imperatives and the integrated operational priorities required to convert disruption into competitive advantage across polyurethane businesses
In conclusion, the polyurethane sector stands at an inflection point characterized by intersecting pressures from sustainability expectations, trade policy shifts, and technological change. Companies that proactively diversify feedstocks, invest in circular pathways, and strengthen supply-chain visibility will be better positioned to manage volatility and to extract higher value from differentiated products. At the same time, those that neglect regulatory foresight or delay digital and process investments risk being outcompeted on both cost and performance metrics. The most effective strategies will be those that align commercialization priorities with operational capability-linking R&D roadmaps to manufacturing scale, and tying procurement flexibility to customer service models.
Leaders should therefore prioritize cross-functional programs that connect market intelligence, product development, and supply-chain execution. By doing so, they can convert near-term disruptions into strategic advantages, securing stronger customer relationships and more resilient margins as the market evolves. The insights in the full study provide the supporting detail necessary to translate these strategic priorities into tactical plans and investment decisions.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of bio-based polyols derived from agricultural waste in high-performance insulation panels
- 5.2. Integration of digital twin technology for optimizing polyurethane foam production processes and reducing waste
- 5.3. Development of tunable reactive hot melt polyurethane adhesives for lightweight automotive assembly applications
- 5.4. Expansion of waterborne polyurethane coatings with improved corrosion resistance for industrial infrastructure
- 5.5. Deployment of isocyanate-free reactive polyurethane systems in consumer durable applications for health safety
- 5.6. Advancement in low-density sprayed polyurethane foam technologies for energy-efficient building retrofits
- 5.7. Scaling of CO2-blown rigid polyurethane foams as eco-friendly alternatives in refrigeration insulation
- 5.8. Utilization of renewable castor oil-based polyurethanes in durable elastomeric seals for industrial machinery
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Polyurethanes Market, by Material Type
- 8.1. Polyester
- 8.2. Polyether
- 9. Polyurethanes Market, by Form
- 9.1. Dispersion
- 9.1.1. Aqueous Dispersion
- 9.1.2. Solvent-based Dispersion
- 9.2. Liquid
- 9.3. Solid
- 10. Polyurethanes Market, by Application
- 10.1. Adhesives & Sealants
- 10.2. Coatings
- 10.3. Elastomers
- 10.4. Flexible Foam
- 10.5. Rigid Foam
- 11. Polyurethanes Market, by End Use
- 11.1. Automotive & Transportation
- 11.2. Building & Construction
- 11.3. Electronics
- 11.4. Footwear & Apparel
- 11.5. Furniture & Flooring
- 11.6. Medical & Healthcare
- 12. Polyurethanes Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Polyurethanes Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Polyurethanes Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. BASF SE
- 15.3.2. Dow Inc.
- 15.3.3. Covestro AG
- 15.3.4. Huntsman Corporation
- 15.3.5. Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.6. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Recticel NV/SA
- 15.3.8. RAMPF Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- 15.3.9. Tosoh Corporation
- 15.3.10. LANXESS AG
- 15.3.11. DIC Corporation
- 15.3.12. Lubrizol Corporation
- 15.3.13. Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.14. Rogers Corporation
- 15.3.15. FoamPartner Group
- 15.3.16. FXI Holdings Inc.
- 15.3.17. INOAC Corporation
- 15.3.18. Armacell International S.A.
- 15.3.19. Trelleborg AB
- 15.3.20. Sika AG
- 15.3.21. Saint-Gobain S.A.
- 15.3.22. 3M Company
- 15.3.23. Evonik Industries AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
