Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market by Plastic Type (Thermoplastics, Thermosets, Bioplastics), Manufacturing Process (Injection Molding, Extrusion, Blow Molding), End User Type, Sales Channel, Application Area - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market was valued at USD 15.45 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 16.53 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.50%, reaching USD 27.57 billion by 2032.
Defining the strategic role of engineered plastics in consumer electronics and why cross-functional material decisions now determine product competitiveness and compliance
The consumer electronics sector increasingly depends on engineered plastics to deliver lightweight, durable, and cost-effective devices that meet accelerating performance and sustainability expectations. Material choice now intersects directly with design innovation, regulatory compliance, and end-user experience, and as a result the plastics supply chain has become a strategic lever rather than a mere procurement line item. In this context, product teams, procurement leaders, and operations executives must view polymer selection, manufacturing practices, and distribution pathways as interconnected decisions that influence time-to-market, warranty performance, and lifecycle footprint.
Moreover, modern product roadmaps demand an integrated approach where polymer properties are evaluated alongside assembly methods and electronic component integration. For example, impact resistance, flame retardancy, and dimensional stability inform enclosure design and thermal management, while surface finish and pigmenting options affect brand perception and repairability. Consequently, stakeholders must adopt cross-functional frameworks to reconcile engineering requirements with cost targets and regulatory constraints. This introduction frames the subsequent sections, which examine transformative market shifts, tariff dynamics, segmentation intelligence, regional performance, competitive behavior, practical recommendations, and the research methodology underpinning these insights.
How sustainability demands, radical form-factor evolution, and manufacturing innovations are converging to redefine plastics roles in electronic devices globally
The landscape for plastics in consumer electronics is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging trends: sustainability imperatives, rapid device form-factor evolution, and manufacturing technology advances. Sustainability mandates are reshaping supplier contracts and material specifications, prompting design teams to prioritize recyclability, post-consumer content, and end-of-life disassembly. At the same time, form-factor innovation-thinner displays, foldable screens, and compact thermal systems-imposes new mechanical and thermal constraints that push material science toward high-performance polymer blends and engineered reinforcements.
Concurrently, manufacturing process innovations such as precision injection molding, micro-extrusion, and hybrid assembly techniques are enabling tighter tolerances and improved surface quality, which open opportunities for integrating structural and aesthetic functions into fewer components. As a result, companies that invest in advanced tooling and design-for-manufacture capabilities can reduce part counts and simplify assembly while maintaining durability. These shifts require proactive supplier collaboration and early-stage material validation to avoid costly design iterations. In sum, the interplay of sustainability expectations, product complexity, and manufacturing sophistication is driving a redefinition of how plastics contribute to value creation in electronics, and industry leaders must adapt their sourcing, R&D, and product development processes to remain competitive.
Understanding the multifaceted supply chain consequences of the 2025 United States tariffs and how strategic localization and material substitution are reshaping procurement choices
The cumulative tariffs implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced new friction into the global plastics supply chain for consumer electronics, affecting material flow, supplier selection, and cost structures. Tariff-induced cost pressures have incentivized firms to re-evaluate sourcing geographies and to accelerate dual-sourcing strategies to maintain continuity. In practice, this has meant that procurement teams are balancing landed cost against inventory risk, lead time variability, and quality consistency, with many adopting tiered sourcing approaches to protect high-volume lines while experimental or niche components are shifted to alternate suppliers.
Importantly, these tariffs have also catalyzed strategic localization efforts in certain product families. For manufacturers whose cost structure and regulatory exposure permit, onshoring or nearshoring of injection-molded components has become a hedge against tariff volatility and freight interruptions. However, relocation requires commensurate investment in tooling, process validation, and workforce training, and so organizations are prioritizing this where product volumes and margins justify the capital outlay. At the same time, some firms are employing material substitution and design simplification to reduce reliance on tariffed polymer blends. These adaptations have downstream implications for engineering, as changes to polymer chemistry or part geometry can affect thermal performance, EMI shielding, and aesthetic finish. Collectively, the 2025 tariff environment has driven a more resilient but complex sourcing landscape where cross-functional alignment between procurement, engineering, and finance is now essential to manage total delivered cost and product integrity.
Integrated segmentation insights that link polymer classes, application demands, manufacturing methods, and distribution channels to product-level material decisions and strategic priorities
To derive actionable insights from market segmentation, it is essential to map materials, applications, product families, manufacturing processes, and distribution channels into an integrated product strategy. Based on Polymer Type, market analysis typically explores Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, Polyamide, Polycarbonate, Polyethylene Terephthalate, and Polyvinyl Chloride, each offering a distinct balance of mechanical properties, thermal resistance, and finishing potential that influences component function and manufacturability. Transitioning between polymer classes requires careful assessment of mold flow, cycle time, and long-term weathering, and therefore material substitution tends to be selected where performance tradeoffs are fully documented and validated.
Based on Application, study traditionally covers Connectors & Switches, Display Components, Housing & Enclosures, and Internal Components, with Housing & Enclosures further broken down across Laptops, Smartphones, Tablets, Televisions, and Wearables. Within smartphones, the landscape further differentiates between Foldable and Non Foldable devices, which present divergent design constraints for hinge durability, thinness, and display integration. Based on Product Type, segmentation aligns to Laptops, Smartphones, Tablets, Televisions, and Wearables, enabling cross-comparison of enclosure design philosophies and expected lifecycle stresses. Based on Manufacturing Process, analysis spans Blow Molding, Extrusion, Injection Molding, and Thermoforming, recognizing that each technique imposes different geometric and material requirements and unlocks varying degrees of design freedom. Based on Distribution Channel, the market is understood through Aftermarket, Contract Manufacturing, and Original Equipment Manufacturers, reflecting how downstream serviceability, aftermarket replacement dynamics, and contractual obligations influence material selection and traceability requirements. Integrating these segmentation dimensions reveals where technical bottlenecks and commercial opportunities intersect, guiding product leaders to prioritize investments in materials science, tooling capabilities, and supplier partnerships that align with targeted device classes and manufacturing footprints.
Regional dynamics shaping polymer adoption, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence material availability, regulatory constraints, and cost structures for plastics used in consumer electronics. The Americas region is characterized by a mix of advanced manufacturing hubs and high consumer demand for premium devices, which drives performance-oriented polymer adoption and a growing emphasis on circularity in product design. Supply chain strategies in this region increasingly emphasize supplier diversification, inventory resilience, and closer alignment between engineering and procurement to mitigate logistical disruptions and tariff exposure.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a regulatory environment that places strong emphasis on recyclability, chemical restrictions, and extended producer responsibility schemes. These regulatory pressures accelerate adoption of recycled content and compliance-driven material selection, and they also encourage investment in disassembly-friendly designs to enable efficient materials recovery. Collaboration between manufacturers, recyclers, and policymakers in this region is becoming an operational imperative to reconcile product performance with compliance obligations.
Asia-Pacific remains the principal hub for large-scale electronics manufacturing and component production, offering dense supplier ecosystems and advanced polymer processing capacity. That concentration enables rapid prototyping and scale-up, but it also creates concentrated supply chain risk that firms must hedge through geographic diversification and supplier qualification programs. Across all regions, cross-border regulatory alignment, logistics optimization, and strategic partnerships with materials suppliers are critical levers for maintaining competitiveness while addressing sustainability and resiliency objectives.
How materials innovation, tooling partnerships, and enhanced supplier governance are redefining competitive advantage in plastics for consumer electronics
Company behavior within the plastics-for-electronics ecosystem reflects a balance between technology leadership, supply reliability, and sustainability commitments. Leading materials suppliers invest in formulation enhancements that improve thermal stability, flame retardancy without heavy halogenates, and intrinsic color control to reduce secondary finishing steps. Concurrently, component manufacturers are partnering with tooling specialists to shorten time-to-first-part and to implement modular tooling architectures that reduce changeover costs. These shifts show a market moving beyond commodity transactions toward strategic, high-value collaborations centered on co-development.
In parallel, contract manufacturers and original equipment manufacturers are enhancing supplier scorecards to prioritize traceability, environmental compliance, and social governance criteria. This evolution has intensified pre-production qualification processes and increased demand for third-party validation of recycled content and chemical compliance. Ultimately, competitive advantage accrues to firms that can combine materials innovation with disciplined manufacturing execution and transparent supply chain practices. Investors and strategic buyers likewise prize organizations with demonstrable capabilities in rapid prototyping, validated low-carbon material options, and scalable production processes that reduce total cost of ownership while meeting evolving regulatory expectations.
Practical, high-impact actions for engineering, procurement, and sustainability teams to reduce risk and accelerate resilient, sustainable product development
Industry leaders must adopt a set of practical, high-impact actions to navigate the current environment where sustainability, tariffs, and rapid innovation converge. First, embed material decision-making earlier in the product lifecycle by requiring polymer risk assessments at the concept stage, including manufacturability, end-of-life considerations, and regulatory exposure. This reduces late-stage redesign and aligns engineering tradeoffs with commercial objectives.
Second, diversify supplier footprints and develop validated alternate sources for critical polymer families, prioritizing dual-sourcing for high-risk components and regional sourcing near key assembly hubs. Third, invest in design-for-recyclability and modular enclosures to reduce the complexity of disassembly and to enable higher recovered material quality. Fourth, pursue focused investments in tooling and process optimization-such as accelerated mold validation and predictive process control-to shorten time-to-volume and to capture yield improvements. Fifth, strengthen cross-functional governance between procurement, engineering, and sustainability teams to ensure coordinated responses to tariff changes, regulatory shifts, and supplier performance issues. Finally, commit to transparent material documentation and third-party validation to support compliance and to enable commercial differentiation with environmentally conscious customers. These steps, taken together, provide a pragmatic roadmap to enhance resilience, reduce lifecycle cost, and accelerate the transition to more sustainable material portfolios.
A rigorous multi-method research methodology combining primary interviews, technical materials assessments, and supply chain scenario analysis to produce actionable insights
The insights presented here derive from a multi-method research approach that combines qualitative interviews, technical material assessments, and supply chain diagnostics. Primary research included structured interviews with materials scientists, design engineers, procurement leaders, and contract manufacturers to capture current pain points and practical adaptation strategies. Secondary inputs comprised publicly available regulatory frameworks, trade policy updates, and technical literature on polymer performance to ensure alignment with prevailing standards and manufacturing best practices.
Analytical techniques integrated materials performance mapping with process capability assessments to evaluate tradeoffs between polymer selection and manufacturing method. Scenario analysis and sensitivity reviews were used to explore strategic responses to tariff disruptions, supplier failures, and rapid shifts in product form factors. Throughout, data quality controls emphasized source triangulation and validation with industry practitioners to ensure that conclusions reflect real-world operational constraints. This methodology supports robust, actionable recommendations tailored to the complex interplay of design, manufacturing, procurement, and regulatory variables that influence plastics selection in consumer electronics.
Synthesis of strategic priorities that convert material, manufacturing, and sourcing decisions into long-term resilience and competitive advantage for electronics makers
In conclusion, plastics remain a central, strategic element in consumer electronics design, influencing device performance, manufacturability, cost, and environmental footprint. The confluence of sustainability expectations, device innovation, manufacturing advances, and trade policy shifts requires a more integrated approach to material selection and supplier management. Organizations that respond proactively-by embedding material risk assessment early, diversifying supplier networks, and investing in design-for-recyclability-will better withstand disruption and capture competitive advantage.
Moving forward, success will depend on coordinated action across engineering, procurement, and sustainability functions, supported by targeted investments in tooling and material validation. By prioritizing these areas, companies can reduce lifecycle costs, improve product reliability, and align with evolving regulatory and consumer expectations. The themes and recommendations in this analysis are designed to help decision-makers translate strategic intent into operational plans that enhance resilience and foster sustainable innovation in plastics for consumer electronics.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Defining the strategic role of engineered plastics in consumer electronics and why cross-functional material decisions now determine product competitiveness and compliance
The consumer electronics sector increasingly depends on engineered plastics to deliver lightweight, durable, and cost-effective devices that meet accelerating performance and sustainability expectations. Material choice now intersects directly with design innovation, regulatory compliance, and end-user experience, and as a result the plastics supply chain has become a strategic lever rather than a mere procurement line item. In this context, product teams, procurement leaders, and operations executives must view polymer selection, manufacturing practices, and distribution pathways as interconnected decisions that influence time-to-market, warranty performance, and lifecycle footprint.
Moreover, modern product roadmaps demand an integrated approach where polymer properties are evaluated alongside assembly methods and electronic component integration. For example, impact resistance, flame retardancy, and dimensional stability inform enclosure design and thermal management, while surface finish and pigmenting options affect brand perception and repairability. Consequently, stakeholders must adopt cross-functional frameworks to reconcile engineering requirements with cost targets and regulatory constraints. This introduction frames the subsequent sections, which examine transformative market shifts, tariff dynamics, segmentation intelligence, regional performance, competitive behavior, practical recommendations, and the research methodology underpinning these insights.
How sustainability demands, radical form-factor evolution, and manufacturing innovations are converging to redefine plastics roles in electronic devices globally
The landscape for plastics in consumer electronics is undergoing transformative shifts driven by three converging trends: sustainability imperatives, rapid device form-factor evolution, and manufacturing technology advances. Sustainability mandates are reshaping supplier contracts and material specifications, prompting design teams to prioritize recyclability, post-consumer content, and end-of-life disassembly. At the same time, form-factor innovation-thinner displays, foldable screens, and compact thermal systems-imposes new mechanical and thermal constraints that push material science toward high-performance polymer blends and engineered reinforcements.
Concurrently, manufacturing process innovations such as precision injection molding, micro-extrusion, and hybrid assembly techniques are enabling tighter tolerances and improved surface quality, which open opportunities for integrating structural and aesthetic functions into fewer components. As a result, companies that invest in advanced tooling and design-for-manufacture capabilities can reduce part counts and simplify assembly while maintaining durability. These shifts require proactive supplier collaboration and early-stage material validation to avoid costly design iterations. In sum, the interplay of sustainability expectations, product complexity, and manufacturing sophistication is driving a redefinition of how plastics contribute to value creation in electronics, and industry leaders must adapt their sourcing, R&D, and product development processes to remain competitive.
Understanding the multifaceted supply chain consequences of the 2025 United States tariffs and how strategic localization and material substitution are reshaping procurement choices
The cumulative tariffs implemented by the United States in 2025 have introduced new friction into the global plastics supply chain for consumer electronics, affecting material flow, supplier selection, and cost structures. Tariff-induced cost pressures have incentivized firms to re-evaluate sourcing geographies and to accelerate dual-sourcing strategies to maintain continuity. In practice, this has meant that procurement teams are balancing landed cost against inventory risk, lead time variability, and quality consistency, with many adopting tiered sourcing approaches to protect high-volume lines while experimental or niche components are shifted to alternate suppliers.
Importantly, these tariffs have also catalyzed strategic localization efforts in certain product families. For manufacturers whose cost structure and regulatory exposure permit, onshoring or nearshoring of injection-molded components has become a hedge against tariff volatility and freight interruptions. However, relocation requires commensurate investment in tooling, process validation, and workforce training, and so organizations are prioritizing this where product volumes and margins justify the capital outlay. At the same time, some firms are employing material substitution and design simplification to reduce reliance on tariffed polymer blends. These adaptations have downstream implications for engineering, as changes to polymer chemistry or part geometry can affect thermal performance, EMI shielding, and aesthetic finish. Collectively, the 2025 tariff environment has driven a more resilient but complex sourcing landscape where cross-functional alignment between procurement, engineering, and finance is now essential to manage total delivered cost and product integrity.
Integrated segmentation insights that link polymer classes, application demands, manufacturing methods, and distribution channels to product-level material decisions and strategic priorities
To derive actionable insights from market segmentation, it is essential to map materials, applications, product families, manufacturing processes, and distribution channels into an integrated product strategy. Based on Polymer Type, market analysis typically explores Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, Polyamide, Polycarbonate, Polyethylene Terephthalate, and Polyvinyl Chloride, each offering a distinct balance of mechanical properties, thermal resistance, and finishing potential that influences component function and manufacturability. Transitioning between polymer classes requires careful assessment of mold flow, cycle time, and long-term weathering, and therefore material substitution tends to be selected where performance tradeoffs are fully documented and validated.
Based on Application, study traditionally covers Connectors & Switches, Display Components, Housing & Enclosures, and Internal Components, with Housing & Enclosures further broken down across Laptops, Smartphones, Tablets, Televisions, and Wearables. Within smartphones, the landscape further differentiates between Foldable and Non Foldable devices, which present divergent design constraints for hinge durability, thinness, and display integration. Based on Product Type, segmentation aligns to Laptops, Smartphones, Tablets, Televisions, and Wearables, enabling cross-comparison of enclosure design philosophies and expected lifecycle stresses. Based on Manufacturing Process, analysis spans Blow Molding, Extrusion, Injection Molding, and Thermoforming, recognizing that each technique imposes different geometric and material requirements and unlocks varying degrees of design freedom. Based on Distribution Channel, the market is understood through Aftermarket, Contract Manufacturing, and Original Equipment Manufacturers, reflecting how downstream serviceability, aftermarket replacement dynamics, and contractual obligations influence material selection and traceability requirements. Integrating these segmentation dimensions reveals where technical bottlenecks and commercial opportunities intersect, guiding product leaders to prioritize investments in materials science, tooling capabilities, and supplier partnerships that align with targeted device classes and manufacturing footprints.
Regional dynamics shaping polymer adoption, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence material availability, regulatory constraints, and cost structures for plastics used in consumer electronics. The Americas region is characterized by a mix of advanced manufacturing hubs and high consumer demand for premium devices, which drives performance-oriented polymer adoption and a growing emphasis on circularity in product design. Supply chain strategies in this region increasingly emphasize supplier diversification, inventory resilience, and closer alignment between engineering and procurement to mitigate logistical disruptions and tariff exposure.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a regulatory environment that places strong emphasis on recyclability, chemical restrictions, and extended producer responsibility schemes. These regulatory pressures accelerate adoption of recycled content and compliance-driven material selection, and they also encourage investment in disassembly-friendly designs to enable efficient materials recovery. Collaboration between manufacturers, recyclers, and policymakers in this region is becoming an operational imperative to reconcile product performance with compliance obligations.
Asia-Pacific remains the principal hub for large-scale electronics manufacturing and component production, offering dense supplier ecosystems and advanced polymer processing capacity. That concentration enables rapid prototyping and scale-up, but it also creates concentrated supply chain risk that firms must hedge through geographic diversification and supplier qualification programs. Across all regions, cross-border regulatory alignment, logistics optimization, and strategic partnerships with materials suppliers are critical levers for maintaining competitiveness while addressing sustainability and resiliency objectives.
How materials innovation, tooling partnerships, and enhanced supplier governance are redefining competitive advantage in plastics for consumer electronics
Company behavior within the plastics-for-electronics ecosystem reflects a balance between technology leadership, supply reliability, and sustainability commitments. Leading materials suppliers invest in formulation enhancements that improve thermal stability, flame retardancy without heavy halogenates, and intrinsic color control to reduce secondary finishing steps. Concurrently, component manufacturers are partnering with tooling specialists to shorten time-to-first-part and to implement modular tooling architectures that reduce changeover costs. These shifts show a market moving beyond commodity transactions toward strategic, high-value collaborations centered on co-development.
In parallel, contract manufacturers and original equipment manufacturers are enhancing supplier scorecards to prioritize traceability, environmental compliance, and social governance criteria. This evolution has intensified pre-production qualification processes and increased demand for third-party validation of recycled content and chemical compliance. Ultimately, competitive advantage accrues to firms that can combine materials innovation with disciplined manufacturing execution and transparent supply chain practices. Investors and strategic buyers likewise prize organizations with demonstrable capabilities in rapid prototyping, validated low-carbon material options, and scalable production processes that reduce total cost of ownership while meeting evolving regulatory expectations.
Practical, high-impact actions for engineering, procurement, and sustainability teams to reduce risk and accelerate resilient, sustainable product development
Industry leaders must adopt a set of practical, high-impact actions to navigate the current environment where sustainability, tariffs, and rapid innovation converge. First, embed material decision-making earlier in the product lifecycle by requiring polymer risk assessments at the concept stage, including manufacturability, end-of-life considerations, and regulatory exposure. This reduces late-stage redesign and aligns engineering tradeoffs with commercial objectives.
Second, diversify supplier footprints and develop validated alternate sources for critical polymer families, prioritizing dual-sourcing for high-risk components and regional sourcing near key assembly hubs. Third, invest in design-for-recyclability and modular enclosures to reduce the complexity of disassembly and to enable higher recovered material quality. Fourth, pursue focused investments in tooling and process optimization-such as accelerated mold validation and predictive process control-to shorten time-to-volume and to capture yield improvements. Fifth, strengthen cross-functional governance between procurement, engineering, and sustainability teams to ensure coordinated responses to tariff changes, regulatory shifts, and supplier performance issues. Finally, commit to transparent material documentation and third-party validation to support compliance and to enable commercial differentiation with environmentally conscious customers. These steps, taken together, provide a pragmatic roadmap to enhance resilience, reduce lifecycle cost, and accelerate the transition to more sustainable material portfolios.
A rigorous multi-method research methodology combining primary interviews, technical materials assessments, and supply chain scenario analysis to produce actionable insights
The insights presented here derive from a multi-method research approach that combines qualitative interviews, technical material assessments, and supply chain diagnostics. Primary research included structured interviews with materials scientists, design engineers, procurement leaders, and contract manufacturers to capture current pain points and practical adaptation strategies. Secondary inputs comprised publicly available regulatory frameworks, trade policy updates, and technical literature on polymer performance to ensure alignment with prevailing standards and manufacturing best practices.
Analytical techniques integrated materials performance mapping with process capability assessments to evaluate tradeoffs between polymer selection and manufacturing method. Scenario analysis and sensitivity reviews were used to explore strategic responses to tariff disruptions, supplier failures, and rapid shifts in product form factors. Throughout, data quality controls emphasized source triangulation and validation with industry practitioners to ensure that conclusions reflect real-world operational constraints. This methodology supports robust, actionable recommendations tailored to the complex interplay of design, manufacturing, procurement, and regulatory variables that influence plastics selection in consumer electronics.
Synthesis of strategic priorities that convert material, manufacturing, and sourcing decisions into long-term resilience and competitive advantage for electronics makers
In conclusion, plastics remain a central, strategic element in consumer electronics design, influencing device performance, manufacturability, cost, and environmental footprint. The confluence of sustainability expectations, device innovation, manufacturing advances, and trade policy shifts requires a more integrated approach to material selection and supplier management. Organizations that respond proactively-by embedding material risk assessment early, diversifying supplier networks, and investing in design-for-recyclability-will better withstand disruption and capture competitive advantage.
Moving forward, success will depend on coordinated action across engineering, procurement, and sustainability functions, supported by targeted investments in tooling and material validation. By prioritizing these areas, companies can reduce lifecycle costs, improve product reliability, and align with evolving regulatory and consumer expectations. The themes and recommendations in this analysis are designed to help decision-makers translate strategic intent into operational plans that enhance resilience and foster sustainable innovation in plastics for consumer electronics.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
191 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of advanced bio-based plastic resins for modular smartphone cases
- 5.2. Integration of recycled ocean plastics into high-end consumer electronics housings
- 5.3. Development of heat-resistant polyetheretherketone components for wearable devices
- 5.4. Emergence of transparent conductive plastic films for foldable touch screen applications
- 5.5. Rise of antimicrobial polymer coatings protecting consumer electronics from microbial growth
- 5.6. Shift to chemical recycling processes for closed-loop plastic sourcing in electronics manufacturing
- 5.7. Development of lightweight glass fiber reinforced plastic brackets reducing device weight
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Plastic Type
- 8.1. Thermoplastics
- 8.1.1. Commodity Thermoplastics
- 8.1.1.1. Polypropylene (PP)
- 8.1.1.2. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)
- 8.1.1.3. Polycarbonate (PC)
- 8.1.1.4. Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
- 8.1.1.5. High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS)
- 8.1.1.6. Polyethylene (PE)
- 8.1.2. Engineering Thermoplastics
- 8.1.2.1. Polyamide (Nylon)
- 8.1.2.2. Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT)
- 8.1.2.3. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
- 8.1.2.4. Polyoxymethylene (POM)
- 8.1.2.5. Polyphenylene Ether Or Polyphenylene Oxide (PPE Or PPO)
- 8.1.3. High-Performance Thermoplastics
- 8.1.3.1. Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)
- 8.1.3.2. Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS)
- 8.1.3.3. Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP)
- 8.2. Thermosets
- 8.2.1. Epoxy Resins
- 8.2.2. Phenolic Resins
- 8.2.3. Unsaturated Polyester Resins
- 8.3. Bioplastics
- 8.3.1. Bio-Based Non-Biodegradable Plastics
- 8.3.2. Biodegradable Plastics
- 8.3.2.1. Polylactic Acid (PLA)
- 8.3.2.2. Polybutylene Succinate And Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate (PBS And PBAT)
- 8.4. Recycled Plastics
- 8.4.1. Post-Consumer Recycled Plastics
- 8.4.2. Post-Industrial Recycled Plastics
- 8.4.3. Chemical Or Advanced Recycled Plastics
- 9. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Manufacturing Process
- 9.1. Injection Molding
- 9.1.1. Standard Injection Molding
- 9.1.2. Thin-Wall Injection Molding
- 9.1.3. Two-Shot And Multi-Component Molding
- 9.1.4. Insert And Overmolding
- 9.2. Extrusion
- 9.2.1. Sheet And Film Extrusion
- 9.2.2. Profile Extrusion
- 9.2.3. Wire And Cable Coating Extrusion
- 9.3. Blow Molding
- 9.3.1. Extrusion Blow Molding
- 9.3.2. Injection Blow Molding
- 9.3.3. Stretch Blow Molding
- 9.4. Thermoforming
- 9.4.1. Vacuum Thermoforming
- 9.4.2. Pressure Thermoforming
- 9.5. 3D Printing And Additive Manufacturing
- 9.5.1. Fused Filament Fabrication
- 9.5.2. Selective Laser Sintering
- 9.5.3. Material Jetting And Other Processes
- 9.6. Compression And Transfer Molding
- 9.7. Foam Molding
- 10. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by End User Type
- 10.1. Consumer Electronics Brand Owners
- 10.2. Electronics Manufacturing Services Providers
- 10.3. Contract Molders And Component Manufacturers
- 10.4. Aftermarket And Replacement Part Providers
- 10.5. Packaging And Accessory Brand Owners
- 11. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Sales Channel
- 11.1. Direct To Original Equipment Manufacturers
- 11.2. Sales Through Tier-One Component Suppliers
- 11.3. Sales Through Distributors And Resin Traders
- 11.4. Online And Digital Material Platforms
- 12. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Application Area
- 12.1. Housings And Enclosures
- 12.1.1. Smartphones And Tablets Housings
- 12.1.2. Laptops And Notebooks Housings
- 12.1.3. Televisions And Monitors Housings
- 12.1.4. Set-Top Boxes And Streaming Devices Housings
- 12.1.5. Gaming Consoles Housings
- 12.1.6. Wearables And Accessories Housings
- 12.2. Internal Structural Components
- 12.2.1. Frames And Brackets
- 12.2.2. Internal Fasteners And Clips
- 12.2.3. Cable Guides And Management Components
- 12.2.4. Shields And Internal Covers
- 12.3. Electronic And Electrical Components
- 12.3.1. Connector Bodies
- 12.3.2. Switch And Button Components
- 12.3.3. Coil Formers And Bobbins
- 12.3.4. Insulators And Spacers
- 12.3.5. Sensor And Antenna Housings
- 12.4. Interface And Input Components
- 12.4.1. Keyboards And Keycaps
- 12.4.2. Mouse And Pointing Device Bodies
- 12.4.3. Touchpad And Touch Surface Bezels
- 12.4.4. Remote Controller Bodies
- 12.5. Display And Optics Components
- 12.5.1. Display Bezels
- 12.5.2. Light Guides And Diffusers
- 12.5.3. Light Lens Covers And Light Pipes
- 12.5.4. Optical Films And Sheets
- 12.6. Power Management And Charging Components
- 12.6.1. Charger And Power Adapter Housings
- 12.6.2. Battery Housings And Trays
- 12.6.3. Power Strip And Extension Unit Housings
- 12.7. Cables And Connectors
- 12.7.1. Cable Insulation And Jacketing
- 12.7.2. Connector Overmolds And Strain Reliefs
- 12.7.3. Wire Management Accessories
- 12.8. Protective Cases And Accessories
- 12.8.1. Smartphone And Tablet Protective Cases
- 12.8.2. Laptop And Device Sleeves With Plastic Elements
- 12.8.3. Device Stands And Mounts
- 12.9. Packaging For Consumer Electronics
- 12.9.1. Blister Packs And Clamshells
- 12.9.2. Inserts Trays And Protective Frames
- 12.9.3. Point Of Sale Display Components
- 13. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Plastics in Consumer Electronics Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Avient Corporation
- 16.3.2. BASF SE
- 16.3.3. Braskem S.A.
- 16.3.4. Celanese Corporation
- 16.3.5. Covestro AG
- 16.3.6. Dow Inc.
- 16.3.7. dsm-firmenich AG
- 16.3.8. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Eastman Chemical Company
- 16.3.10. Exxon Mobil Corporation
- 16.3.11. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 16.3.12. INEOS Group Limited
- 16.3.13. Kuraray Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Lavergne, Inc.
- 16.3.15. LG Chem Ltd.
- 16.3.16. Lotte Chemical Corporation
- 16.3.17. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
- 16.3.18. MBA Polymers Inc.
- 16.3.19. Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
- 16.3.20. NatureWorks LLC
- 16.3.21. NOVA Chemicals Corporation
- 16.3.22. PolyVisions, Inc.
- 16.3.23. Qingdao Gon Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.24. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.25. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 16.3.26. Solvay S.A.
- 16.3.27. Toray Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.28. Trinseo PLC
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
