Plastic Bags & Sacks Market by Product Type (Courier Bags & Mailers, Food Packaging Bags, Garbage Sacks), Raw Material (High Density Polyethylene, Linear Low Density Polyethylene, Low Density Polyethylene), Thickness, Capacity, End Use - Global Forecast 2
Description
The Plastic Bags & Sacks Market was valued at USD 22.87 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 23.81 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.18%, reaching USD 31.75 billion by 2032.
A concise and authoritative introduction capturing industry drivers, regulatory pressures, supply chain realities, and innovation priorities reshaping the sector
The plastic bags and sacks sector occupies a critical junction between everyday consumer convenience, industrial functionality, and escalating environmental accountability. Over recent years, the industry has been shaped by converging forces: regulatory intensity focused on single-use plastics, innovation in polymer chemistry and additives, and shifting procurement priorities among retailers, manufacturers, and institutional buyers. These dynamics are prompting manufacturers to reassess product design, material sourcing, and end-of-life strategies while maintaining operational cost-effectiveness and performance criteria.
In parallel, supply chain stressors-ranging from feedstock volatility to logistics bottlenecks-have elevated the importance of agility and supplier diversification. Firms are investing in technical capabilities that support thicker-gauge solutions for durability, biodegradable materials for regulated applications, and optimized formats for e-commerce and retail displays. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper exploration of market inflection points, regulatory impacts, segmentation-level nuances, and competitive responses that together define near-term strategy and long-term resilience for participants across the value chain.
An incisive overview of transformative shifts driven by sustainability mandates, material innovation, consumer expectations, and supply chain modernization
The landscape of plastic bags and sacks is undergoing transformative shifts driven by sustainability mandates, material innovation, and evolving consumption patterns. Policy frameworks globally are accelerating transition away from conventional single-use items, prompting suppliers to accelerate development of biodegradable formulations, recyclable mono-material constructions, and mechanically robust alternatives that can meet performance expectations while aligning with recycling streams. At the same time, advances in polymer blends and processing are enabling cost-effective replacements for legacy formats.
Consumer behavior is equally pivotal: demand for convenience remains high, but shopper preferences increasingly favor clearly labeled recyclable or compostable options. Retailers are responding with differentiated packaging assortments tailored to e-commerce fulfillment, specialty formats for premium goods, and durable reusable alternatives that reduce long-term dependence on disposables. Concurrently, manufacturers are reorganizing production footprints to shorten lead times and improve responsiveness, adopting digital production controls and just-in-time supply models. These shifts are producing a more dynamic market in which adaptability and demonstrable sustainability credentials are essential competitive differentiators.
A nuanced analysis of the cumulative operational and strategic repercussions resulting from the United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 on sourcing, pricing, and supply chain resilience
The introduction of tariff measures in the United States in 2025 has created ripple effects across sourcing strategies, supplier negotiations, and cost structures throughout the supply chain. Tariff adjustments on polymer imports and finished goods have prompted downstream buyers to reassess supplier geographies and long-term procurement contracts. In consequence, many firms have accelerated efforts to diversify sourcing away from tariff-exposed origins toward nearshore suppliers, alternative feedstocks, or domestic producers to reduce exposure to trade volatility and compliance complexity.
These tariff dynamics also intensified conversations about vertical integration and value capture. Import-sensitive manufacturers began revisiting contractual terms with suppliers, incorporating clauses to share tariff risk or pass through incremental costs conditionally, while procurement teams focused on longer-term supplier partnerships to stabilize pricing. In addition, tariffs highlighted the importance of customs classification accuracy and the potential benefits of product redesign to qualify for preferential trade treatment. Together, these adaptations underscore a strategic movement toward supply chain resilience, compliance sophistication, and cost mitigation strategies that are likely to endure beyond the immediate tariff cycle.
Comprehensive segmentation intelligence revealing how product types, polymer selections, end-use demands, thickness bands, and capacity tiers jointly dictate strategic priorities
Deep segmentation insights reveal how product types, material choices, end-use applications, thickness ranges, and capacity categories interplay to shape demand patterns and innovation priorities. Product-type differentiation spans courier bags and mailers, food packaging bags, garbage sacks, industrial sacks, and shopping bags, with garbage sacks further segmented into biodegradable sacks, heavy-duty variants, and standard bin liners while shopping bags include loop-handle, plain, and t-shirt styles; performance requirements and material selection differ markedly across these subsegments, prompting distinct manufacturing techniques and additive packages. Raw material choices are a core determinant of product positioning, with high density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and polypropylene each offering specific balance points between tensile strength, flexibility, machinability, and recyclability; manufacturers frequently select materials based on the desired lifecycle outcome and downstream recycling compatibility.
End-use segmentation includes agriculture, food & beverage, healthcare, industrial, and retail, where retail demand further divides into e-commerce, specialty stores, and supermarkets; each end-use imposes unique regulatory, hygiene, and performance criteria that influence product form factors and certification requirements. Thickness plays a defining role in functional performance and perceived quality, with options spanning less than 20 microns, 20–40 microns, 40–60 microns, and above 60 microns, and selection is driven by application-specific load-bearing needs and regulatory thresholds. Capacity tiers range from up to 5 kg, 5–10 kg, 10–25 kg, to above 25 kg and inform both film gauge and sealing technology choices. By examining these segmentation vectors in concert rather than isolation, decision-makers can identify crosscutting opportunities for material substitution, process optimization, and targeted product development that align with customer requirements and regulatory compliance obligations.
Key regional perspectives that illuminate how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics drive differentiated demand, regulation, and innovation strategies
Regional dynamics are shaping demand profiles, regulatory expectations, and competitive behavior across the globe, with each macro-region exhibiting distinct drivers and constraints. In the Americas, regulatory activism at municipal and state levels coexists with robust retail and e-commerce expansion, producing demand for both recyclable and heavier-duty formulations as logistics and waste-management systems evolve. Commercial players in this region are prioritizing supply chain transparency, material traceability, and partnerships that enable circularity initiatives while meeting performance and cost targets.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a complex mosaic in which stringent regulatory regimes and ambitious circular economy targets in parts of Europe contrast with emerging market growth in EMEA regions that are still building waste-processing infrastructure. This divergence accelerates product innovation toward recyclable mono-materials and certified compostables for regulated markets, while cost-sensitive segments favor material-efficient solutions. Across Asia-Pacific, high-volume manufacturing capability and rapidly expanding retail and e-commerce channels drive scale advantages, but there is rising focus on sustainability credentials and localized recycling systems. Consequently, market participants are adopting regionally differentiated strategies that balance compliance, cost optimization, and innovation investments to serve varied customer and regulatory landscapes.
Insightful company-level analysis describing how global manufacturers, regional specialists, and converters compete through capacity flexibility, partnerships, and sustainability investments
Competitive intelligence indicates that the industry is characterized by a mix of global manufacturers, specialized regional producers, and agile converters that together serve a range of end markets. Leading global firms have invested in broad production footprints, vertically integrated capabilities, and product portfolios that span commodity films to specialty biodegradable and recyclable formats, enabling them to serve multinational retail and industrial customers with consistent specifications. Regional and niche players often capitalize on speed to market, customer intimacy, and specialized product lines, such as heavy-duty industrial sacks or premium loop-handle shopping bags, which require bespoke converting skills.
Strategic activity among companies has emphasized capacity flexibility, partnerships with raw material suppliers, and investments in research and development focused on polymer alternatives, barrier technologies, and post-consumer recyclate incorporation. Mergers, joint ventures, and strategic alliances have been used to secure feedstock streams and broaden technological capabilities, while commercial strategies increasingly highlight sustainability credentials and chain-of-custody verification. For buyers and investors, understanding the competitive positioning of manufacturers-relative to their innovation pipelines, geographic coverage, and sustainability commitments-remains central to supplier selection and risk assessment.
Actionable and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, accelerate sustainable design, and align procurement with evolving regulatory and customer demands
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic, prioritized actions that align commercial goals with regulatory realities and stakeholder expectations. First, embed material-agnostic innovation processes that enable rapid substitution across high density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and polypropylene where performance and recyclability permit, thus preserving product functionality while improving end-of-life outcomes. Second, strengthen supplier diversification strategies to mitigate tariff exposure and feedstock volatility by cultivating nearshore partners and flexible procurement contracts that include contingency mechanisms for trade disruptions. Third, accelerate adoption of design-for-recycling practices and certification pathways to reduce downstream processing friction and improve access to sustainability-conscious retail customers.
Moreover, invest in digital traceability systems that provide chain-of-custody visibility and support claims verification, thereby reducing reputational and compliance risk. Parallel investments in processing flexibility-such as equipment that handles a range of film thicknesses from less than 20 microns up to above 60 microns and capacities across small to large formats-will enable rapid response to shifting customer requirements. Finally, develop clear commercial propositions for end users in agriculture, healthcare, industrial, and retail channels, ensuring that pricing, service, and sustainability messaging are aligned with customer priorities to capture growth opportunities while managing margin pressure.
Methodological transparency and mixed-method validation combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature review, and supply chain verification to support strategic findings
The research methodology combines primary interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain validation to ensure a robust and transparent analytical foundation. Primary engagements involved structured conversations with procurement leaders, product engineers, waste-management specialists, and commercial directors across manufacturing and retail organizations to capture operational realities, pain points, and innovation priorities. These qualitative inputs were synthesized with a systematic review of regulatory documents, standards, and technical papers addressing polymer properties, compostability certifications, and recycling infrastructure to ground conclusions in contemporary practice.
Supplementary validation included supplier mapping and production capability assessments to verify claims about material flexibility, thickness capabilities, and capacity tiers. Triangulation was applied across data sources to confirm consistency and identify areas of divergence that warrant caution. Where possible, methodological steps included provenance checks for material classification and scenario analysis for supply chain disruptions triggered by trade measures. This mixed-method approach supports the report’s strategic recommendations while making explicit the assumptions and evidence behind key insights.
A forward-looking conclusion that synthesizes sustainability, supply chain resilience, and product strategy as the pillars of future competitive advantage in the sector
In conclusion, the plastic bags and sacks sector is at an inflection point where sustainability imperatives, regulatory developments, and supply chain recalibrations converge to redefine competitive advantage. Companies that invest in adaptable manufacturing capabilities, broaden material portfolios to include recyclable and biodegradable options, and shore up supply chain resilience will be better positioned to navigate tariff-driven disruptions and shifting customer expectations. Importantly, differentiation will emerge not solely from material innovation but from the ability to demonstrate credible end-of-life pathways, secure reliable feedstock sources, and deliver consistent performance across diverse end-use segments.
Looking ahead, successful participants will integrate product development, procurement strategy, and regulatory monitoring into a cohesive approach that anticipates change rather than reacts to it. By doing so, they can convert regulatory and market pressures into opportunities for premium positioning, operational efficiency, and long-term customer loyalty. The path to sustainable competitiveness will be incremental and require cross-functional coordination, but the organizations that execute with foresight and discipline will capture disproportionate strategic advantage.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise and authoritative introduction capturing industry drivers, regulatory pressures, supply chain realities, and innovation priorities reshaping the sector
The plastic bags and sacks sector occupies a critical junction between everyday consumer convenience, industrial functionality, and escalating environmental accountability. Over recent years, the industry has been shaped by converging forces: regulatory intensity focused on single-use plastics, innovation in polymer chemistry and additives, and shifting procurement priorities among retailers, manufacturers, and institutional buyers. These dynamics are prompting manufacturers to reassess product design, material sourcing, and end-of-life strategies while maintaining operational cost-effectiveness and performance criteria.
In parallel, supply chain stressors-ranging from feedstock volatility to logistics bottlenecks-have elevated the importance of agility and supplier diversification. Firms are investing in technical capabilities that support thicker-gauge solutions for durability, biodegradable materials for regulated applications, and optimized formats for e-commerce and retail displays. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper exploration of market inflection points, regulatory impacts, segmentation-level nuances, and competitive responses that together define near-term strategy and long-term resilience for participants across the value chain.
An incisive overview of transformative shifts driven by sustainability mandates, material innovation, consumer expectations, and supply chain modernization
The landscape of plastic bags and sacks is undergoing transformative shifts driven by sustainability mandates, material innovation, and evolving consumption patterns. Policy frameworks globally are accelerating transition away from conventional single-use items, prompting suppliers to accelerate development of biodegradable formulations, recyclable mono-material constructions, and mechanically robust alternatives that can meet performance expectations while aligning with recycling streams. At the same time, advances in polymer blends and processing are enabling cost-effective replacements for legacy formats.
Consumer behavior is equally pivotal: demand for convenience remains high, but shopper preferences increasingly favor clearly labeled recyclable or compostable options. Retailers are responding with differentiated packaging assortments tailored to e-commerce fulfillment, specialty formats for premium goods, and durable reusable alternatives that reduce long-term dependence on disposables. Concurrently, manufacturers are reorganizing production footprints to shorten lead times and improve responsiveness, adopting digital production controls and just-in-time supply models. These shifts are producing a more dynamic market in which adaptability and demonstrable sustainability credentials are essential competitive differentiators.
A nuanced analysis of the cumulative operational and strategic repercussions resulting from the United States tariff measures enacted in 2025 on sourcing, pricing, and supply chain resilience
The introduction of tariff measures in the United States in 2025 has created ripple effects across sourcing strategies, supplier negotiations, and cost structures throughout the supply chain. Tariff adjustments on polymer imports and finished goods have prompted downstream buyers to reassess supplier geographies and long-term procurement contracts. In consequence, many firms have accelerated efforts to diversify sourcing away from tariff-exposed origins toward nearshore suppliers, alternative feedstocks, or domestic producers to reduce exposure to trade volatility and compliance complexity.
These tariff dynamics also intensified conversations about vertical integration and value capture. Import-sensitive manufacturers began revisiting contractual terms with suppliers, incorporating clauses to share tariff risk or pass through incremental costs conditionally, while procurement teams focused on longer-term supplier partnerships to stabilize pricing. In addition, tariffs highlighted the importance of customs classification accuracy and the potential benefits of product redesign to qualify for preferential trade treatment. Together, these adaptations underscore a strategic movement toward supply chain resilience, compliance sophistication, and cost mitigation strategies that are likely to endure beyond the immediate tariff cycle.
Comprehensive segmentation intelligence revealing how product types, polymer selections, end-use demands, thickness bands, and capacity tiers jointly dictate strategic priorities
Deep segmentation insights reveal how product types, material choices, end-use applications, thickness ranges, and capacity categories interplay to shape demand patterns and innovation priorities. Product-type differentiation spans courier bags and mailers, food packaging bags, garbage sacks, industrial sacks, and shopping bags, with garbage sacks further segmented into biodegradable sacks, heavy-duty variants, and standard bin liners while shopping bags include loop-handle, plain, and t-shirt styles; performance requirements and material selection differ markedly across these subsegments, prompting distinct manufacturing techniques and additive packages. Raw material choices are a core determinant of product positioning, with high density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and polypropylene each offering specific balance points between tensile strength, flexibility, machinability, and recyclability; manufacturers frequently select materials based on the desired lifecycle outcome and downstream recycling compatibility.
End-use segmentation includes agriculture, food & beverage, healthcare, industrial, and retail, where retail demand further divides into e-commerce, specialty stores, and supermarkets; each end-use imposes unique regulatory, hygiene, and performance criteria that influence product form factors and certification requirements. Thickness plays a defining role in functional performance and perceived quality, with options spanning less than 20 microns, 20–40 microns, 40–60 microns, and above 60 microns, and selection is driven by application-specific load-bearing needs and regulatory thresholds. Capacity tiers range from up to 5 kg, 5–10 kg, 10–25 kg, to above 25 kg and inform both film gauge and sealing technology choices. By examining these segmentation vectors in concert rather than isolation, decision-makers can identify crosscutting opportunities for material substitution, process optimization, and targeted product development that align with customer requirements and regulatory compliance obligations.
Key regional perspectives that illuminate how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics drive differentiated demand, regulation, and innovation strategies
Regional dynamics are shaping demand profiles, regulatory expectations, and competitive behavior across the globe, with each macro-region exhibiting distinct drivers and constraints. In the Americas, regulatory activism at municipal and state levels coexists with robust retail and e-commerce expansion, producing demand for both recyclable and heavier-duty formulations as logistics and waste-management systems evolve. Commercial players in this region are prioritizing supply chain transparency, material traceability, and partnerships that enable circularity initiatives while meeting performance and cost targets.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a complex mosaic in which stringent regulatory regimes and ambitious circular economy targets in parts of Europe contrast with emerging market growth in EMEA regions that are still building waste-processing infrastructure. This divergence accelerates product innovation toward recyclable mono-materials and certified compostables for regulated markets, while cost-sensitive segments favor material-efficient solutions. Across Asia-Pacific, high-volume manufacturing capability and rapidly expanding retail and e-commerce channels drive scale advantages, but there is rising focus on sustainability credentials and localized recycling systems. Consequently, market participants are adopting regionally differentiated strategies that balance compliance, cost optimization, and innovation investments to serve varied customer and regulatory landscapes.
Insightful company-level analysis describing how global manufacturers, regional specialists, and converters compete through capacity flexibility, partnerships, and sustainability investments
Competitive intelligence indicates that the industry is characterized by a mix of global manufacturers, specialized regional producers, and agile converters that together serve a range of end markets. Leading global firms have invested in broad production footprints, vertically integrated capabilities, and product portfolios that span commodity films to specialty biodegradable and recyclable formats, enabling them to serve multinational retail and industrial customers with consistent specifications. Regional and niche players often capitalize on speed to market, customer intimacy, and specialized product lines, such as heavy-duty industrial sacks or premium loop-handle shopping bags, which require bespoke converting skills.
Strategic activity among companies has emphasized capacity flexibility, partnerships with raw material suppliers, and investments in research and development focused on polymer alternatives, barrier technologies, and post-consumer recyclate incorporation. Mergers, joint ventures, and strategic alliances have been used to secure feedstock streams and broaden technological capabilities, while commercial strategies increasingly highlight sustainability credentials and chain-of-custody verification. For buyers and investors, understanding the competitive positioning of manufacturers-relative to their innovation pipelines, geographic coverage, and sustainability commitments-remains central to supplier selection and risk assessment.
Actionable and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to enhance resilience, accelerate sustainable design, and align procurement with evolving regulatory and customer demands
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic, prioritized actions that align commercial goals with regulatory realities and stakeholder expectations. First, embed material-agnostic innovation processes that enable rapid substitution across high density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and polypropylene where performance and recyclability permit, thus preserving product functionality while improving end-of-life outcomes. Second, strengthen supplier diversification strategies to mitigate tariff exposure and feedstock volatility by cultivating nearshore partners and flexible procurement contracts that include contingency mechanisms for trade disruptions. Third, accelerate adoption of design-for-recycling practices and certification pathways to reduce downstream processing friction and improve access to sustainability-conscious retail customers.
Moreover, invest in digital traceability systems that provide chain-of-custody visibility and support claims verification, thereby reducing reputational and compliance risk. Parallel investments in processing flexibility-such as equipment that handles a range of film thicknesses from less than 20 microns up to above 60 microns and capacities across small to large formats-will enable rapid response to shifting customer requirements. Finally, develop clear commercial propositions for end users in agriculture, healthcare, industrial, and retail channels, ensuring that pricing, service, and sustainability messaging are aligned with customer priorities to capture growth opportunities while managing margin pressure.
Methodological transparency and mixed-method validation combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical literature review, and supply chain verification to support strategic findings
The research methodology combines primary interviews, technical literature review, and supply chain validation to ensure a robust and transparent analytical foundation. Primary engagements involved structured conversations with procurement leaders, product engineers, waste-management specialists, and commercial directors across manufacturing and retail organizations to capture operational realities, pain points, and innovation priorities. These qualitative inputs were synthesized with a systematic review of regulatory documents, standards, and technical papers addressing polymer properties, compostability certifications, and recycling infrastructure to ground conclusions in contemporary practice.
Supplementary validation included supplier mapping and production capability assessments to verify claims about material flexibility, thickness capabilities, and capacity tiers. Triangulation was applied across data sources to confirm consistency and identify areas of divergence that warrant caution. Where possible, methodological steps included provenance checks for material classification and scenario analysis for supply chain disruptions triggered by trade measures. This mixed-method approach supports the report’s strategic recommendations while making explicit the assumptions and evidence behind key insights.
A forward-looking conclusion that synthesizes sustainability, supply chain resilience, and product strategy as the pillars of future competitive advantage in the sector
In conclusion, the plastic bags and sacks sector is at an inflection point where sustainability imperatives, regulatory developments, and supply chain recalibrations converge to redefine competitive advantage. Companies that invest in adaptable manufacturing capabilities, broaden material portfolios to include recyclable and biodegradable options, and shore up supply chain resilience will be better positioned to navigate tariff-driven disruptions and shifting customer expectations. Importantly, differentiation will emerge not solely from material innovation but from the ability to demonstrate credible end-of-life pathways, secure reliable feedstock sources, and deliver consistent performance across diverse end-use segments.
Looking ahead, successful participants will integrate product development, procurement strategy, and regulatory monitoring into a cohesive approach that anticipates change rather than reacts to it. By doing so, they can convert regulatory and market pressures into opportunities for premium positioning, operational efficiency, and long-term customer loyalty. The path to sustainable competitiveness will be incremental and require cross-functional coordination, but the organizations that execute with foresight and discipline will capture disproportionate strategic advantage.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
189 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing adoption of biodegradable and compostable polymers in grocery bag production to meet sustainability targets
- 5.2. Expansion of extended producer responsibility regulations accelerating design for recyclability in plastic sack manufacturing
- 5.3. Integration of post-consumer recycled resin into high-barrier packaging sacks to reduce carbon footprint and waste
- 5.4. Implementation of lightweighting technologies in carry bag design to optimize raw material use and transport efficiency
- 5.5. Development of digital printing solutions for personalized plastic bags enhancing brand engagement and traceability
- 5.6. Growth of ocean-bound plastic collection initiatives driving supply of certified recycled materials for bag production
- 5.7. Rising investment in advanced polymer coatings to improve barrier performance for moisture-sensitive bulk sacks
- 5.8. Deployment of refillable packaging systems for retail sacks aligned with zero-waste consumer shopping trends
- 5.9. Adoption of anti-microbial and anti-fog additives in retail bags to extend shelf life of perishable goods during transport
- 5.10. Implementation of carbon footprint labeling on plastic bag products to provide transparency and influence purchasing decisions
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Courier Bags & Mailers
- 8.2. Food Packaging Bags
- 8.3. Garbage Sacks
- 8.3.1. Biodegradable Sacks
- 8.3.2. Heavy Duty
- 8.3.3. Standard Bin Liners
- 8.4. Industrial Sacks
- 8.5. Shopping Bags
- 8.5.1. Loop Handle
- 8.5.2. Plain
- 8.5.3. T-Shirt Bags
- 9. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Raw Material
- 9.1. High Density Polyethylene
- 9.2. Linear Low Density Polyethylene
- 9.3. Low Density Polyethylene
- 9.4. Polypropylene
- 10. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Thickness
- 10.1. 20-40 Microns
- 10.2. 40-60 Microns
- 10.3. Above 60 Microns
- 10.4. Less Than 20 Microns
- 11. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Capacity
- 11.1. 10-25 Kg
- 11.2. 5-10 Kg
- 11.3. Above 25 Kg
- 11.4. Up To 5 Kg
- 12. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by End Use
- 12.1. Agriculture
- 12.2. Food & Beverage
- 12.3. Healthcare
- 12.4. Industrial
- 12.5. Retail
- 12.5.1. E-Commerce
- 12.5.2. Specialty Stores
- 12.5.3. Supermarkets
- 13. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Plastic Bags & Sacks Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. AEP Group
- 16.3.2. Alpha Poly Corporatio
- 16.3.3. Amcor, Inc.
- 16.3.4. AmeriGlobe LLC
- 16.3.5. Arihant Packaging India Private Limited
- 16.3.6. Berry Global Inc.
- 16.3.7. Bischof+Klein SE & Co. KG
- 16.3.8. Dana Poly, Inc.
- 16.3.9. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.10. Gigantic Bag
- 16.3.11. Goglio S.p.A.
- 16.3.12. Greif, Inc.
- 16.3.13. Hanoi Plastic Bag Manufacturing JSC
- 16.3.14. Inteplast Group, Ltd.
- 16.3.15. International Plastics, LLC
- 16.3.16. New York Packaging / Redi-Bag USA
- 16.3.17. Novolex Holdings LLC
- 16.3.18. Ovasco Industries
- 16.3.19. P&C Da Nang
- 16.3.20. ProAmpac Intermediate, Inc.
- 16.3.21. Rutan Poly Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.22. Sigma Plastics Group
- 16.3.23. Sonoco Products Company
- 16.3.24. Stephen Gould Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
