Pea Protein Market by Form (Concentrate, Isolate, Powder), Source (Green Pea, Yellow Pea), Functionality, Application, Distribution Channel, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Pea Protein Market was valued at USD 2.12 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.24 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.39%, reaching USD 3.48 billion by 2032.
An authoritative introduction explaining how pea protein evolved into a multifunctional ingredient driving formulation innovation and supply chain strategic decisions
Pea protein has moved from niche alternative to strategic ingredient across multiple value chains, driven by evolving consumer preferences, formulation advances, and supply chain maturation. This introduction frames the discussion by outlining the ingredient's functional versatility, growing visibility among formulators, and the shifting dynamics that put it at the center of product innovation across food, beverage, nutraceutical, personal care, and animal feed applications. The narrative highlights how technical refinements in extraction and fractionation have expanded opportunities for use across texturization, emulsification, foaming, and water binding, enabling manufacturers to replace or complement legacy proteins while meeting sensory and nutritional objectives.
Moreover, sustainability narratives and traceability expectations have elevated pulses beyond simple ingredient status to a strategic sourcing decision that implicates growers, processors, and brand owners. As consumer demand for plant-based and natural formulations intersects with regulatory scrutiny and retailer expectations, pea protein’s role is simultaneously technical and reputational. Therefore, stakeholders must consider not only performance metrics and cost dynamics but also supplier transparency, environmental impacts across the value chain, and certification pathways. This introduction establishes the conceptual lens for the report: a focus on functional performance, supply chain resilience, and commercial strategies that translate ingredient capability into market differentiation.
A clear analysis of the transformative shifts reshaping pea protein supply chains, formulation choices, and buyer expectations across ingredient ecosystems
The landscape surrounding pea protein is undergoing transformative shifts that affect sourcing, product formulation, and go-to-market strategies. On the supply side, improvements in processing technology and a broader base of pulse processors have increased the range of available functional formats, enabling manufacturers to select from concentrates, isolates, and powders that better match application needs. Concurrently, buyers are demanding deeper provenance information and environmental transparency, which has accelerated investment in traceability systems and sustainability certifications throughout the value chain.
On the demand side, consumer emphasis on health, clean labels, and plant-based options has moved pea protein into mainstream innovation pipelines, prompting category crossovers from traditional plant-based meat analogs into bakery, dairy alternatives, and nutraceuticals. As a result, commercial teams are aligning formulation, claims, and packaging strategies to leverage both functional and narrative value. Trade dynamics and evolving regulatory frameworks are also reshaping supplier relations, prompting manufacturers to diversify sourcing between green pea and yellow pea varieties and to prioritize partners capable of delivering consistent functional performance, traceable supply, and compliance with evolving standards.
A focused examination of how the 2025 United States tariff measures produced cascading effects across procurement strategies, processing investment, and supply chain resilience
The implementation of United States tariffs in 2025 introduced a set of cumulative impacts that ripple across procurement strategies, contractual relationships, and route-to-market economics for pea protein stakeholders. In response, buyers reassessed supplier portfolios, accelerating diversification of geographic sourcing to mitigate concentration risks and potential cost volatility. Domestic processors and growers found renewed strategic relevance as organizations evaluated reshoring and nearshoring options to reduce exposure to cross-border tariff dynamics. Consequently, long-term sourcing agreements and flexible contracting mechanisms increased in priority as companies sought to stabilize input access and manage margin pressure.
Tariff-driven adjustments also influenced pricing negotiations and commercial terms throughout the value chain, prompting downstream manufacturers to revisit formulations, ingredient blends, and value propositions. This pressure catalyzed investment in domestic processing capacity and innovation focused on improving extraction efficiency and product yield. Logistics and trade planning adapted as well, with procurement teams optimizing transport routes and leveraging trade agreements where applicable to soften tariff impacts. At the same time, the policy environment stimulated strategic collaborations between growers, processors, and end users aimed at securing feedstock quality and traceability, thereby turning a policy shock into an impetus for strengthening local value chains and product differentiation based on origin and sustainability credentials.
In-depth segmentation insights connecting form, source, functionality, application, distribution channels, and end-user needs to strategic product and commercial decisions
Segmentation insights reveal how form, source, functionality, application, distribution, and end-user orientation shape competitive positioning and development priorities across the pea protein value chain. The market is studied by form across concentrate, isolate, and powder, with each format offering distinct trade-offs between functionality, cost, and ease of formulation. Product developers must evaluate these trade-offs when specifying an ingredient for textural applications versus nutritional enrichment, and when balancing processor capability with formulation tolerances.
The market is examined by source across green pea and yellow pea, and the botanical and compositional differences between these varieties can guide decisions about sensory profile, processing yield, and expected functional behavior. Functionality is analyzed across emulsification, foaming, texturization, and water binding, and understanding which functional attributes dominate in a target application informs supplier qualification and specification standards. Application segmentation covers animal feed, food and beverages, nutraceuticals, and personal care; food and beverages is further reviewed across bakery and confectionery, dairy alternatives, and functional food, while nutraceuticals is detailed into dietary supplements and sports nutrition. Distribution channels are assessed across offline retail and online retail, with offline retail further broken down into specialty stores and supermarkets and hypermarkets, and end users include animal feed manufacturers, dietary supplement manufacturers, and food manufacturers. Together these segmentation lenses enable stakeholders to prioritize product development, allocate commercial resources, and refine go-to-market approaches that match functional requirements with distribution realities and end-user expectations.
Actionable regional insights revealing how distinct market dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific require tailored sourcing and commercial strategies
Regional dynamics influence supply chain choices, innovation focus, and commercial tactics across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, a combination of established pulse agriculture, advancing processing infrastructure, and vibrant plant-based innovation ecosystems has favored integrated strategies that emphasize traceability and product performance. Firms operating here often prioritize vertical partnerships between growers and processors to secure feedstock quality and to co-develop product specifications that meet domestic and export demand.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory scrutiny on labeling and environmental claims, together with sophisticated retail channels, drives a focus on certified sourcing, sustainability metrics, and premiumization. Manufacturers and brands operating in these markets frequently invest in demonstrable carbon and water performance improvements to satisfy retailer and regulatory expectations. In Asia-Pacific, rapid consumer adoption of protein diversification and expanding retail e-commerce create significant demand for tailored solutions that address local taste profiles, cost considerations, and flexible packaging formats. Regional supply strategies consequently incorporate a mix of imports, local processing capacity expansion, and collaborative innovation with regional ingredient suppliers to meet fast-evolving consumer preferences and distribution demands.
Key company-level strategic insights explaining how processors, ingredient producers, and brand owners are differentiating through technology, partnerships, and sustainability narratives
Company-level dynamics reveal distinct strategic postures among ingredient producers, processors, and downstream brand owners as they seek to capture functional value and secure resilient supply. Leading processors differentiate through investments in fractionation and purification technologies that enable a broader product palette and tighter specification control. These technical capabilities allow manufacturers to position their offerings for specialized uses such as high-stability emulsions or superior water binding in bakery systems. At the same time, some producers prioritize scale and cost competitiveness by optimizing milling and drying efficiencies, enabling them to serve high-volume applications where price sensitivity outweighs premium functionality.
Strategic partnerships and commercial agreements between growers and processors have become increasingly common, as companies seek to guarantee raw material quality and traceability. Innovation activity is concentrated on improving sensory profiles, reducing off-notes, and expanding solubility across pH ranges, which together enhance the ingredient’s applicability in beverages and dairy alternative platforms. Additionally, a number of firms are pursuing sustainability narratives through certifications, lifecycle reporting, and supplier development programs that appeal to retailers and large brand owners. Overall, company strategies cluster around technical differentiation, supply chain integration, and narrative-driven positioning tied to environmental and social credentials.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen supply resilience, expand functional capability, and capture value across channels and applications
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of tactical and strategic actions to translate market dynamics into competitive advantage. First, prioritize supplier diversification that balances geographic risk and functional performance; secure multi-origin sourcing agreements to mitigate tariff and logistics shocks while maintaining specification stability. Second, invest in processing capabilities or partnerships that expand the usable product portfolio across concentrate, isolate, and powder formats to meet varied developer needs and to enable margin optimization through higher-value functional grades.
Third, deepen product development efforts aimed at functionality improvements-focused work on emulsification, foaming, texturization, and water binding will unlock adjacent applications in bakery, beverages, and personal care. Fourth, strengthen traceability and sustainability claims through measurable targets and third-party validation to meet regulatory expectations and retailer scrutiny. Fifth, adapt distribution strategies to combine offline and online retail channels effectively, prioritizing channel-tailored packaging and commercial terms that support both specialty and mass retail. Finally, align commercial, regulatory, and R&D teams to accelerate response to trade policy changes, ensuring contingency plans for tariffs and logistical disruptions are embedded into supplier contracts and product launch timelines.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining primary interviews, trade analysis, functional testing, and scenario validation to ensure practical and validated conclusions
The research methodology combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, triangulated findings that reflect real-world commercial and technical conditions. Primary research included in-depth interviews with ingredient processors, formulation scientists, procurement leaders, and category managers across food, nutraceutical, and personal care sectors to capture frontline perspectives on functionality, sourcing challenges, and commercial priorities. These conversations informed the development of technical requirement matrices and supplier assessment frameworks that underpin the analysis.
Secondary research encompassed a comprehensive review of trade flows, agricultural production patterns, patent activity, and public regulatory guidance to contextualize supply chain dynamics and policy impacts. Trade and logistics analysis focused on shipment routing, port capacity, and customs considerations to understand practical barriers to sourcing. Functional assessment incorporated laboratory performance data and formulation case studies to evaluate emulsification, foaming, texturization, and water binding characteristics across product formats. Finally, findings were validated through cross-referencing with multiple expert interviews and scenario testing to ensure that recommendations are actionable and grounded in operational realities.
A succinct conclusion drawing together functional, supply chain, and regulatory factors that determine the strategic path for pea protein across diverse end markets
The conclusion synthesizes how functional performance, supply chain strategy, and regulatory context converge to define the future trajectory of pea protein across multiple end markets. Functional advances and processing scale have opened pathways for the ingredient to participate in mainstream food and beverage innovation, while also finding roles in nutraceuticals, personal care, and animal feed. At the same time, evolving trade policy and heightened sustainability expectations have reframed sourcing choices, pushing companies toward diversified supply bases and more transparent value chains.
Moving forward, resilience will depend on integrating technical capability with commercial foresight: processors and brand owners that can articulate consistent functionality, verified sustainability credentials, and contractual protections against geopolitical and trade shocks will be best positioned to convert ingredient capability into commercial success. As organizations adapt to these realities, collaboration across growers, processors, and formulators will become a central competitive differentiator, enabling faster product development cycles, improved supply security, and stronger alignment with retailer and consumer expectations.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative introduction explaining how pea protein evolved into a multifunctional ingredient driving formulation innovation and supply chain strategic decisions
Pea protein has moved from niche alternative to strategic ingredient across multiple value chains, driven by evolving consumer preferences, formulation advances, and supply chain maturation. This introduction frames the discussion by outlining the ingredient's functional versatility, growing visibility among formulators, and the shifting dynamics that put it at the center of product innovation across food, beverage, nutraceutical, personal care, and animal feed applications. The narrative highlights how technical refinements in extraction and fractionation have expanded opportunities for use across texturization, emulsification, foaming, and water binding, enabling manufacturers to replace or complement legacy proteins while meeting sensory and nutritional objectives.
Moreover, sustainability narratives and traceability expectations have elevated pulses beyond simple ingredient status to a strategic sourcing decision that implicates growers, processors, and brand owners. As consumer demand for plant-based and natural formulations intersects with regulatory scrutiny and retailer expectations, pea protein’s role is simultaneously technical and reputational. Therefore, stakeholders must consider not only performance metrics and cost dynamics but also supplier transparency, environmental impacts across the value chain, and certification pathways. This introduction establishes the conceptual lens for the report: a focus on functional performance, supply chain resilience, and commercial strategies that translate ingredient capability into market differentiation.
A clear analysis of the transformative shifts reshaping pea protein supply chains, formulation choices, and buyer expectations across ingredient ecosystems
The landscape surrounding pea protein is undergoing transformative shifts that affect sourcing, product formulation, and go-to-market strategies. On the supply side, improvements in processing technology and a broader base of pulse processors have increased the range of available functional formats, enabling manufacturers to select from concentrates, isolates, and powders that better match application needs. Concurrently, buyers are demanding deeper provenance information and environmental transparency, which has accelerated investment in traceability systems and sustainability certifications throughout the value chain.
On the demand side, consumer emphasis on health, clean labels, and plant-based options has moved pea protein into mainstream innovation pipelines, prompting category crossovers from traditional plant-based meat analogs into bakery, dairy alternatives, and nutraceuticals. As a result, commercial teams are aligning formulation, claims, and packaging strategies to leverage both functional and narrative value. Trade dynamics and evolving regulatory frameworks are also reshaping supplier relations, prompting manufacturers to diversify sourcing between green pea and yellow pea varieties and to prioritize partners capable of delivering consistent functional performance, traceable supply, and compliance with evolving standards.
A focused examination of how the 2025 United States tariff measures produced cascading effects across procurement strategies, processing investment, and supply chain resilience
The implementation of United States tariffs in 2025 introduced a set of cumulative impacts that ripple across procurement strategies, contractual relationships, and route-to-market economics for pea protein stakeholders. In response, buyers reassessed supplier portfolios, accelerating diversification of geographic sourcing to mitigate concentration risks and potential cost volatility. Domestic processors and growers found renewed strategic relevance as organizations evaluated reshoring and nearshoring options to reduce exposure to cross-border tariff dynamics. Consequently, long-term sourcing agreements and flexible contracting mechanisms increased in priority as companies sought to stabilize input access and manage margin pressure.
Tariff-driven adjustments also influenced pricing negotiations and commercial terms throughout the value chain, prompting downstream manufacturers to revisit formulations, ingredient blends, and value propositions. This pressure catalyzed investment in domestic processing capacity and innovation focused on improving extraction efficiency and product yield. Logistics and trade planning adapted as well, with procurement teams optimizing transport routes and leveraging trade agreements where applicable to soften tariff impacts. At the same time, the policy environment stimulated strategic collaborations between growers, processors, and end users aimed at securing feedstock quality and traceability, thereby turning a policy shock into an impetus for strengthening local value chains and product differentiation based on origin and sustainability credentials.
In-depth segmentation insights connecting form, source, functionality, application, distribution channels, and end-user needs to strategic product and commercial decisions
Segmentation insights reveal how form, source, functionality, application, distribution, and end-user orientation shape competitive positioning and development priorities across the pea protein value chain. The market is studied by form across concentrate, isolate, and powder, with each format offering distinct trade-offs between functionality, cost, and ease of formulation. Product developers must evaluate these trade-offs when specifying an ingredient for textural applications versus nutritional enrichment, and when balancing processor capability with formulation tolerances.
The market is examined by source across green pea and yellow pea, and the botanical and compositional differences between these varieties can guide decisions about sensory profile, processing yield, and expected functional behavior. Functionality is analyzed across emulsification, foaming, texturization, and water binding, and understanding which functional attributes dominate in a target application informs supplier qualification and specification standards. Application segmentation covers animal feed, food and beverages, nutraceuticals, and personal care; food and beverages is further reviewed across bakery and confectionery, dairy alternatives, and functional food, while nutraceuticals is detailed into dietary supplements and sports nutrition. Distribution channels are assessed across offline retail and online retail, with offline retail further broken down into specialty stores and supermarkets and hypermarkets, and end users include animal feed manufacturers, dietary supplement manufacturers, and food manufacturers. Together these segmentation lenses enable stakeholders to prioritize product development, allocate commercial resources, and refine go-to-market approaches that match functional requirements with distribution realities and end-user expectations.
Actionable regional insights revealing how distinct market dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific require tailored sourcing and commercial strategies
Regional dynamics influence supply chain choices, innovation focus, and commercial tactics across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, a combination of established pulse agriculture, advancing processing infrastructure, and vibrant plant-based innovation ecosystems has favored integrated strategies that emphasize traceability and product performance. Firms operating here often prioritize vertical partnerships between growers and processors to secure feedstock quality and to co-develop product specifications that meet domestic and export demand.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory scrutiny on labeling and environmental claims, together with sophisticated retail channels, drives a focus on certified sourcing, sustainability metrics, and premiumization. Manufacturers and brands operating in these markets frequently invest in demonstrable carbon and water performance improvements to satisfy retailer and regulatory expectations. In Asia-Pacific, rapid consumer adoption of protein diversification and expanding retail e-commerce create significant demand for tailored solutions that address local taste profiles, cost considerations, and flexible packaging formats. Regional supply strategies consequently incorporate a mix of imports, local processing capacity expansion, and collaborative innovation with regional ingredient suppliers to meet fast-evolving consumer preferences and distribution demands.
Key company-level strategic insights explaining how processors, ingredient producers, and brand owners are differentiating through technology, partnerships, and sustainability narratives
Company-level dynamics reveal distinct strategic postures among ingredient producers, processors, and downstream brand owners as they seek to capture functional value and secure resilient supply. Leading processors differentiate through investments in fractionation and purification technologies that enable a broader product palette and tighter specification control. These technical capabilities allow manufacturers to position their offerings for specialized uses such as high-stability emulsions or superior water binding in bakery systems. At the same time, some producers prioritize scale and cost competitiveness by optimizing milling and drying efficiencies, enabling them to serve high-volume applications where price sensitivity outweighs premium functionality.
Strategic partnerships and commercial agreements between growers and processors have become increasingly common, as companies seek to guarantee raw material quality and traceability. Innovation activity is concentrated on improving sensory profiles, reducing off-notes, and expanding solubility across pH ranges, which together enhance the ingredient’s applicability in beverages and dairy alternative platforms. Additionally, a number of firms are pursuing sustainability narratives through certifications, lifecycle reporting, and supplier development programs that appeal to retailers and large brand owners. Overall, company strategies cluster around technical differentiation, supply chain integration, and narrative-driven positioning tied to environmental and social credentials.
Practical and prioritized recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen supply resilience, expand functional capability, and capture value across channels and applications
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of tactical and strategic actions to translate market dynamics into competitive advantage. First, prioritize supplier diversification that balances geographic risk and functional performance; secure multi-origin sourcing agreements to mitigate tariff and logistics shocks while maintaining specification stability. Second, invest in processing capabilities or partnerships that expand the usable product portfolio across concentrate, isolate, and powder formats to meet varied developer needs and to enable margin optimization through higher-value functional grades.
Third, deepen product development efforts aimed at functionality improvements-focused work on emulsification, foaming, texturization, and water binding will unlock adjacent applications in bakery, beverages, and personal care. Fourth, strengthen traceability and sustainability claims through measurable targets and third-party validation to meet regulatory expectations and retailer scrutiny. Fifth, adapt distribution strategies to combine offline and online retail channels effectively, prioritizing channel-tailored packaging and commercial terms that support both specialty and mass retail. Finally, align commercial, regulatory, and R&D teams to accelerate response to trade policy changes, ensuring contingency plans for tariffs and logistical disruptions are embedded into supplier contracts and product launch timelines.
A transparent, multi-method research approach combining primary interviews, trade analysis, functional testing, and scenario validation to ensure practical and validated conclusions
The research methodology combined qualitative and quantitative approaches to ensure robust, triangulated findings that reflect real-world commercial and technical conditions. Primary research included in-depth interviews with ingredient processors, formulation scientists, procurement leaders, and category managers across food, nutraceutical, and personal care sectors to capture frontline perspectives on functionality, sourcing challenges, and commercial priorities. These conversations informed the development of technical requirement matrices and supplier assessment frameworks that underpin the analysis.
Secondary research encompassed a comprehensive review of trade flows, agricultural production patterns, patent activity, and public regulatory guidance to contextualize supply chain dynamics and policy impacts. Trade and logistics analysis focused on shipment routing, port capacity, and customs considerations to understand practical barriers to sourcing. Functional assessment incorporated laboratory performance data and formulation case studies to evaluate emulsification, foaming, texturization, and water binding characteristics across product formats. Finally, findings were validated through cross-referencing with multiple expert interviews and scenario testing to ensure that recommendations are actionable and grounded in operational realities.
A succinct conclusion drawing together functional, supply chain, and regulatory factors that determine the strategic path for pea protein across diverse end markets
The conclusion synthesizes how functional performance, supply chain strategy, and regulatory context converge to define the future trajectory of pea protein across multiple end markets. Functional advances and processing scale have opened pathways for the ingredient to participate in mainstream food and beverage innovation, while also finding roles in nutraceuticals, personal care, and animal feed. At the same time, evolving trade policy and heightened sustainability expectations have reframed sourcing choices, pushing companies toward diversified supply bases and more transparent value chains.
Moving forward, resilience will depend on integrating technical capability with commercial foresight: processors and brand owners that can articulate consistent functionality, verified sustainability credentials, and contractual protections against geopolitical and trade shocks will be best positioned to convert ingredient capability into commercial success. As organizations adapt to these realities, collaboration across growers, processors, and formulators will become a central competitive differentiator, enabling faster product development cycles, improved supply security, and stronger alignment with retailer and consumer expectations.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Formulation of pea protein-based meat analogs with improved fibrous texture using novel extrusion techniques
- 5.2. Adoption of enzyme-assisted flavor masking processes to reduce beany off-notes in pea protein concentrates
- 5.3. Integration of pea protein isolates in infant and pediatric nutrition for hypoallergenic formulations
- 5.4. Sustainability-driven sourcing of peas through regenerative agriculture and carbon reduction metrics
- 5.5. Development of cross-linked pea protein microgels for controlled nutrient release in sports supplements
- 5.6. Use of precision fermentation to enhance amino acid profile and functional properties of pea proteins
- 5.7. Traceability and blockchain-enabled supply chain transparency from farm to pea protein ingredient
- 5.8. Hybrid plant protein blends combining pea and fava bean isolates for superior solubility and mouthfeel
- 5.9. Application of pea protein nanoparticles in encapsulating omega-3 oils for improved stability
- 5.10. Expansion of pea protein usage in powdered beverage mixes targeting clean label and vegan consumers
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Pea Protein Market, by Form
- 8.1. Concentrate
- 8.2. Isolate
- 8.3. Powder
- 9. Pea Protein Market, by Source
- 9.1. Green Pea
- 9.2. Yellow Pea
- 10. Pea Protein Market, by Functionality
- 10.1. Emulsification
- 10.2. Foaming
- 10.3. Texturization
- 10.4. Water Binding
- 11. Pea Protein Market, by Application
- 11.1. Animal Feed
- 11.2. Food And Beverages
- 11.2.1. Bakery And Confectionery
- 11.2.2. Dairy Alternatives
- 11.2.3. Functional Food
- 11.3. Nutraceuticals
- 11.3.1. Dietary Supplements
- 11.3.2. Sports Nutrition
- 11.4. Personal Care
- 12. Pea Protein Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline Retail
- 12.1.1. Specialty Stores
- 12.1.2. Supermarkets And Hypermarkets
- 12.2. Online Retail
- 13. Pea Protein Market, by End User
- 13.1. Animal Feed Manufacturers
- 13.2. Dietary Supplement Manufacturers
- 13.3. Food Manufacturers
- 14. Pea Protein Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Pea Protein Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Pea Protein Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Roquette Frères S.A.
- 17.3.2. Cosucra Groupe Warcoing S.A.
- 17.3.3. Cargill, Incorporated
- 17.3.4. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 17.3.5. Glanbia plc
- 17.3.6. Ingredion Incorporated
- 17.3.7. Emsland Group GmbH
- 17.3.8. Axiom Foods, Inc.
- 17.3.9. Burcon NutraScience Corporation
- 17.3.10. Farbest Brands, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
