Parking Meter Market by Meter Type (Multi Space, Single Space), Payment Type (Card Operation, Coin Operation, Mobile Payment), Mounting Type, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Parking Meter Market was valued at USD 1.58 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.77 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 13.74%, reaching USD 3.90 billion by 2032.
Framing the parking meter environment with a concise orientation to stakeholders, technology vectors, policy drivers and operational priorities
Framing the parking meter environment with a concise orientation to stakeholders, technology vectors, policy drivers and operational priorities
The parking meter landscape occupies a unique intersection of urban mobility, municipal revenue management, and digital payments. Municipalities, private operators, lot owners, and parking management companies all interact with infrastructure that increasingly blends hardware durability with software intelligence. As urban planners prioritize curbside efficiency and cities adopt smart city principles, parking meters have evolved from mechanical coin boxes to networked devices that serve as data collection nodes and transaction endpoints.
Stakeholders must therefore balance legacy asset management with the imperative to modernize. Operational priorities include ensuring uptime, simplifying payment flows, enhancing enforcement accuracy, and providing a seamless user experience. At the same time, technological vectors such as wireless connectivity, integrated sensors, and cloud-based backends enable richer functionality, including dynamic pricing experiments, occupancy analytics, and real-time enforcement support.
Consequently, strategic planning for parking meter deployments requires a cross-disciplinary approach that accounts for procurement complexity, payments integration, privacy and security considerations, and the need for modular upgrade paths. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis by situating the market within the broader shifts affecting urban mobility, municipal finance, and the payments ecosystem.
Examining transformative shifts reshaping parking meter deployments through technology, policy, and changing user expectations
Examining transformative shifts reshaping parking meter deployments through technology, policy, and changing user expectations
The parking meter market is experiencing an accelerated transformation driven by several converging forces. First, the integration of connectivity and sensor technology has enabled devices to move beyond transactional roles to become nodes in urban data networks. This shift allows operators to capture occupancy metrics, optimize enforcement patterns, and test new pricing models. Second, payment modernization has progressed rapidly as card acceptance, mobile applications, NFC, and QR code solutions reduce friction for end users and increase transaction traceability for operators.
Moreover, policy and sustainability priorities are reshaping deployment choices. Cities are increasingly focused on reducing congestion and emissions, which elevates the value of parking systems that support rapid turnover and data-driven curb management. Privacy and cybersecurity concerns have also become central, prompting stricter procurement specifications and greater emphasis on secure communications and device lifecycle management. Finally, the vendor landscape is moving toward integrated service offerings that combine hardware, software, analytics, and managed services, creating new avenues for recurring revenue while raising the bar for interoperability and long-term support.
Taken together, these shifts require operators and suppliers to prioritize modular architectures, resilient supply chains, and user-centric payment experiences to remain competitive and compliant in a rapidly changing operational environment.
Assessing the cumulative impact of United States tariffs announced in 2025 on cost structures, sourcing strategies and supplier relationships
Assessing the cumulative impact of United States tariffs announced in 2025 on cost structures, sourcing strategies and supplier relationships
Tariff actions in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for organizations that manufacture, assemble, or procure parking meter hardware and components. The immediate operational consequence has been a re-evaluation of supplier footprints and component sourcing strategies. Procurement teams are increasingly weighing the trade-offs between onshore, nearshore and offshore production to manage landed costs and delivery lead times. As a result, contract specifications and supplier agreements are being amended to include greater flexibility for alternative sourcing and renegotiated incoterms.
In parallel, manufacturers and system integrators have accelerated efforts to identify substitution opportunities for affected components and to redesign product assemblies in ways that reduce dependency on tariffed parts. This has led to increased collaboration across engineering, procurement, and finance teams to ensure that product roadmaps remain deliverable without sacrificing performance or compliance. Operationally, private operators and municipal buyers are recalibrating procurement cycles and considering longer-term maintenance contracts that can smooth the impact of component cost volatility.
Furthermore, the tariffs have encouraged a sharper focus on total cost of ownership and supplier resilience. Firms are prioritizing suppliers with diversified manufacturing footprints, robust quality assurance practices, and transparent supply chain traceability. At the same time, legal and compliance teams are working closely with trade advisors to understand classifications and exemptions that could mitigate exposure. These cumulative impacts underscore the need for proactive sourcing strategies and tighter alignment between product engineering and procurement to preserve both margin and service reliability.
Deriving segmentation insights across meter types, payment formats, mounting configurations and end-user categories to inform deployment strategies
Deriving segmentation insights across meter types, payment formats, mounting configurations and end-user categories to inform deployment strategies
Analyzing segmentation reveals where value accrues and which configurations align best with specific operational objectives. Based on meter type, the landscape differentiates between multi space and single space deployments, where multi space options further subdivide into pay and display, pay station, and plate payment formats. These distinctions affect site planning, user flows and enforcement methodologies; multi space systems favor centralized payment points and can scale well in high-density zones, whereas single space meters remain useful for spot control and granular price signals.
Payment type segmentation also matters for customer experience and back-office reconciliation. Card operation, coin operation, and mobile payment options coexist in many environments, with card operation itself segmenting into credit card and debit card flows, and mobile payment branching into app based payment, NFC payment, and QR code payment alternatives. Each payment channel carries different fee structures, hardware integration needs and user acceptance dynamics, so operators must design for multi-modal support while optimizing for the most used touchpoints.
Mounting type influences installation and maintenance decisions. Pole-mounted, standalone/free-standing, and wall-mounted options each present unique site preparation and vandalism-resilience considerations, and choices here should align with urban design constraints and maintenance access. Finally, end user segmentation distinguishes municipal buyers from private operators, with private operators further split between lot owners and parking management companies. This division affects contracting patterns, service level expectations and investment horizons, making it essential to tailor commercial models and installation standards to the operational profile of the end user.
Presenting regional dynamics that highlight differentiated regulatory frameworks, adoption speeds and partnership models across global markets
Presenting regional dynamics that highlight differentiated regulatory frameworks, adoption speeds and partnership models across global markets
Regional nuances strongly influence deployment cadence and strategic priorities. In the Americas, adoption is often driven by urban congestion management objectives and municipal revenue optimization, with operators favoring flexible payment integrations and data-driven enforcement. Public procurement practices in this region also tend to encourage pilot programs that demonstrate operational benefits before scale deployment, creating opportunities for managed-service offerings that pair hardware supply with software and analytics.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory emphasis on privacy, public procurement integrity, and environmental outcomes affects both specification and procurement timelines. Local authorities frequently require robust data protection measures and lifecycle sustainability documentation, which influences vendor selection and technical interoperability. Partnerships between local system integrators and multinational suppliers are common as a way to bridge compliance needs with advanced technology.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization and high mobile payment penetration encourage innovative payment-first solutions and aggressive timelines for deploying smart city pilots. Public-private partnerships and private operators play a substantial role in expanding capacity and introducing new commercial models. Across all regions, differences in labor costs, regulatory oversight, and procurement cycles make it necessary for suppliers to adopt region-specific go-to-market approaches and to maintain flexibility in service delivery and support models.
Observing company-level strategies that differentiate through product breadth, platform depth, and integrated service propositions
Observing company-level strategies that differentiate through product breadth, platform depth, and integrated service propositions
Leading organizations in the parking meter ecosystem are pursuing a combination of product innovation and service expansion to secure competitive advantage. On the product side, emphasis has shifted toward modular hardware platforms that simplify upgrades and reduce refresh costs. This architectural approach allows vendors to replace payment modules, communications elements, or sensor arrays without full device replacement, thereby improving lifecycle economics and customer satisfaction.
Simultaneously, software and analytics capabilities are becoming central to value propositions. Companies that couple device-level reliability with cloud-based management platforms and actionable insights create stickier relationships with municipal and private operators. Strategic partnerships between hardware specialists and fintech providers are also common, accelerating the rollout of advanced payment options while reducing time-to-integration risks.
From a go-to-market perspective, firms are exploring outcome-based contracts, managed service agreements, and subscription models that align vendor incentives with uptime and service quality. These commercial constructs are appealing to buyers that prefer predictable expenditure profiles and reduced operational burden. Finally, investment in installation networks, field service operations, and robust remote diagnostics is a differentiator for companies seeking to minimize on-site interventions and maintain high service levels over device lifecycles.
Providing actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen sourcing, accelerate technology adoption, and enhance operational resilience
Providing actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen sourcing, accelerate technology adoption, and enhance operational resilience
Leaders should prioritize modular design principles that permit incremental upgrades to payments and communications components, thereby protecting earlier investments and shortening deployment cycles. In parallel, diversify supplier bases across multiple geographies and qualify alternate component options to mitigate tariff and logistics disruptions. Align procurement, engineering, and legal teams to ensure contract flexibility that accommodates sudden changes in trade policy and component availability.
Adopt a multi-channel payment strategy that supports card acceptance alongside mobile app, NFC, and QR code options while continuously monitoring user behavior to rationalize feature rollouts. Invest in secure, standards-based APIs that simplify integration with enforcement and mobility platforms, enabling faster time to market for new services. Strengthen data governance and cybersecurity protocols to meet regulatory expectations and to build trust with municipalities and private operators.
Finally, deploy pilot programs that pair technology trials with clearly defined KPIs and expansion triggers, and develop outcome-based commercial models that align supplier incentives with operational performance. By taking these steps, organizations can reduce exposure to external shocks, improve user experience, and create more defensible and service-oriented business models.
Detailing the research methodology used to ensure robustness, triangulation and practical relevance in findings and recommendations
Detailing the research methodology used to ensure robustness, triangulation and practical relevance in findings and recommendations
The analysis is grounded in a mixed-method research approach that integrates primary and secondary evidence. Primary inputs include structured interviews with municipal procurement officials, private operators, lot owners, parking management companies, system integrators, and technology suppliers. These discussions provided firsthand perspectives on deployment challenges, procurement preferences, and technology adoption drivers.
Secondary research encompassed policy documents, technical specifications, vendor literature, and open-source reporting to contextualize primary insights and verify technical claims. Supply chain mapping and component-level assessment were performed to understand sourcing dependencies and tariff sensitivities, while technology assessments evaluated interoperability, upgradeability, and security posture across common device architectures. Throughout the process, findings were triangulated across multiple data sources and validated through follow-up interviews to ensure accuracy and practical relevance for stakeholders.
Concluding synthesis that highlights strategic priorities for operators, suppliers and policymakers navigating an evolving parking meter environment
Concluding synthesis that highlights strategic priorities for operators, suppliers and policymakers navigating an evolving parking meter environment
The parking meter ecosystem is at a pivotal moment where technology capabilities, policy expectations, and procurement realities intersect. Operators and suppliers that embrace modular architectures, diversify sourcing footprints, and invest in secure, flexible payment integrations will be better positioned to navigate tariff shocks and regulatory demands. Equally important is the need for closer collaboration between procurement, engineering and service teams to translate strategic objectives into operational plans that preserve uptime and user satisfaction.
Policy makers and municipal buyers should continue to emphasize data protection, sustainability, and interoperability when specifying systems, while also offering pathways for controlled pilots that validate benefits for both citizens and the city. Ultimately, success will hinge on the ability to convert data into actionable management insights, to adopt procurement mechanisms that balance cost with resilience, and to maintain a relentless focus on the end-user experience as a core metric for system performance.
Framing the parking meter environment with a concise orientation to stakeholders, technology vectors, policy drivers and operational priorities
Framing the parking meter environment with a concise orientation to stakeholders, technology vectors, policy drivers and operational priorities
The parking meter landscape occupies a unique intersection of urban mobility, municipal revenue management, and digital payments. Municipalities, private operators, lot owners, and parking management companies all interact with infrastructure that increasingly blends hardware durability with software intelligence. As urban planners prioritize curbside efficiency and cities adopt smart city principles, parking meters have evolved from mechanical coin boxes to networked devices that serve as data collection nodes and transaction endpoints.
Stakeholders must therefore balance legacy asset management with the imperative to modernize. Operational priorities include ensuring uptime, simplifying payment flows, enhancing enforcement accuracy, and providing a seamless user experience. At the same time, technological vectors such as wireless connectivity, integrated sensors, and cloud-based backends enable richer functionality, including dynamic pricing experiments, occupancy analytics, and real-time enforcement support.
Consequently, strategic planning for parking meter deployments requires a cross-disciplinary approach that accounts for procurement complexity, payments integration, privacy and security considerations, and the need for modular upgrade paths. This introduction sets the stage for deeper analysis by situating the market within the broader shifts affecting urban mobility, municipal finance, and the payments ecosystem.
Examining transformative shifts reshaping parking meter deployments through technology, policy, and changing user expectations
Examining transformative shifts reshaping parking meter deployments through technology, policy, and changing user expectations
The parking meter market is experiencing an accelerated transformation driven by several converging forces. First, the integration of connectivity and sensor technology has enabled devices to move beyond transactional roles to become nodes in urban data networks. This shift allows operators to capture occupancy metrics, optimize enforcement patterns, and test new pricing models. Second, payment modernization has progressed rapidly as card acceptance, mobile applications, NFC, and QR code solutions reduce friction for end users and increase transaction traceability for operators.
Moreover, policy and sustainability priorities are reshaping deployment choices. Cities are increasingly focused on reducing congestion and emissions, which elevates the value of parking systems that support rapid turnover and data-driven curb management. Privacy and cybersecurity concerns have also become central, prompting stricter procurement specifications and greater emphasis on secure communications and device lifecycle management. Finally, the vendor landscape is moving toward integrated service offerings that combine hardware, software, analytics, and managed services, creating new avenues for recurring revenue while raising the bar for interoperability and long-term support.
Taken together, these shifts require operators and suppliers to prioritize modular architectures, resilient supply chains, and user-centric payment experiences to remain competitive and compliant in a rapidly changing operational environment.
Assessing the cumulative impact of United States tariffs announced in 2025 on cost structures, sourcing strategies and supplier relationships
Assessing the cumulative impact of United States tariffs announced in 2025 on cost structures, sourcing strategies and supplier relationships
Tariff actions in 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for organizations that manufacture, assemble, or procure parking meter hardware and components. The immediate operational consequence has been a re-evaluation of supplier footprints and component sourcing strategies. Procurement teams are increasingly weighing the trade-offs between onshore, nearshore and offshore production to manage landed costs and delivery lead times. As a result, contract specifications and supplier agreements are being amended to include greater flexibility for alternative sourcing and renegotiated incoterms.
In parallel, manufacturers and system integrators have accelerated efforts to identify substitution opportunities for affected components and to redesign product assemblies in ways that reduce dependency on tariffed parts. This has led to increased collaboration across engineering, procurement, and finance teams to ensure that product roadmaps remain deliverable without sacrificing performance or compliance. Operationally, private operators and municipal buyers are recalibrating procurement cycles and considering longer-term maintenance contracts that can smooth the impact of component cost volatility.
Furthermore, the tariffs have encouraged a sharper focus on total cost of ownership and supplier resilience. Firms are prioritizing suppliers with diversified manufacturing footprints, robust quality assurance practices, and transparent supply chain traceability. At the same time, legal and compliance teams are working closely with trade advisors to understand classifications and exemptions that could mitigate exposure. These cumulative impacts underscore the need for proactive sourcing strategies and tighter alignment between product engineering and procurement to preserve both margin and service reliability.
Deriving segmentation insights across meter types, payment formats, mounting configurations and end-user categories to inform deployment strategies
Deriving segmentation insights across meter types, payment formats, mounting configurations and end-user categories to inform deployment strategies
Analyzing segmentation reveals where value accrues and which configurations align best with specific operational objectives. Based on meter type, the landscape differentiates between multi space and single space deployments, where multi space options further subdivide into pay and display, pay station, and plate payment formats. These distinctions affect site planning, user flows and enforcement methodologies; multi space systems favor centralized payment points and can scale well in high-density zones, whereas single space meters remain useful for spot control and granular price signals.
Payment type segmentation also matters for customer experience and back-office reconciliation. Card operation, coin operation, and mobile payment options coexist in many environments, with card operation itself segmenting into credit card and debit card flows, and mobile payment branching into app based payment, NFC payment, and QR code payment alternatives. Each payment channel carries different fee structures, hardware integration needs and user acceptance dynamics, so operators must design for multi-modal support while optimizing for the most used touchpoints.
Mounting type influences installation and maintenance decisions. Pole-mounted, standalone/free-standing, and wall-mounted options each present unique site preparation and vandalism-resilience considerations, and choices here should align with urban design constraints and maintenance access. Finally, end user segmentation distinguishes municipal buyers from private operators, with private operators further split between lot owners and parking management companies. This division affects contracting patterns, service level expectations and investment horizons, making it essential to tailor commercial models and installation standards to the operational profile of the end user.
Presenting regional dynamics that highlight differentiated regulatory frameworks, adoption speeds and partnership models across global markets
Presenting regional dynamics that highlight differentiated regulatory frameworks, adoption speeds and partnership models across global markets
Regional nuances strongly influence deployment cadence and strategic priorities. In the Americas, adoption is often driven by urban congestion management objectives and municipal revenue optimization, with operators favoring flexible payment integrations and data-driven enforcement. Public procurement practices in this region also tend to encourage pilot programs that demonstrate operational benefits before scale deployment, creating opportunities for managed-service offerings that pair hardware supply with software and analytics.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory emphasis on privacy, public procurement integrity, and environmental outcomes affects both specification and procurement timelines. Local authorities frequently require robust data protection measures and lifecycle sustainability documentation, which influences vendor selection and technical interoperability. Partnerships between local system integrators and multinational suppliers are common as a way to bridge compliance needs with advanced technology.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization and high mobile payment penetration encourage innovative payment-first solutions and aggressive timelines for deploying smart city pilots. Public-private partnerships and private operators play a substantial role in expanding capacity and introducing new commercial models. Across all regions, differences in labor costs, regulatory oversight, and procurement cycles make it necessary for suppliers to adopt region-specific go-to-market approaches and to maintain flexibility in service delivery and support models.
Observing company-level strategies that differentiate through product breadth, platform depth, and integrated service propositions
Observing company-level strategies that differentiate through product breadth, platform depth, and integrated service propositions
Leading organizations in the parking meter ecosystem are pursuing a combination of product innovation and service expansion to secure competitive advantage. On the product side, emphasis has shifted toward modular hardware platforms that simplify upgrades and reduce refresh costs. This architectural approach allows vendors to replace payment modules, communications elements, or sensor arrays without full device replacement, thereby improving lifecycle economics and customer satisfaction.
Simultaneously, software and analytics capabilities are becoming central to value propositions. Companies that couple device-level reliability with cloud-based management platforms and actionable insights create stickier relationships with municipal and private operators. Strategic partnerships between hardware specialists and fintech providers are also common, accelerating the rollout of advanced payment options while reducing time-to-integration risks.
From a go-to-market perspective, firms are exploring outcome-based contracts, managed service agreements, and subscription models that align vendor incentives with uptime and service quality. These commercial constructs are appealing to buyers that prefer predictable expenditure profiles and reduced operational burden. Finally, investment in installation networks, field service operations, and robust remote diagnostics is a differentiator for companies seeking to minimize on-site interventions and maintain high service levels over device lifecycles.
Providing actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen sourcing, accelerate technology adoption, and enhance operational resilience
Providing actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen sourcing, accelerate technology adoption, and enhance operational resilience
Leaders should prioritize modular design principles that permit incremental upgrades to payments and communications components, thereby protecting earlier investments and shortening deployment cycles. In parallel, diversify supplier bases across multiple geographies and qualify alternate component options to mitigate tariff and logistics disruptions. Align procurement, engineering, and legal teams to ensure contract flexibility that accommodates sudden changes in trade policy and component availability.
Adopt a multi-channel payment strategy that supports card acceptance alongside mobile app, NFC, and QR code options while continuously monitoring user behavior to rationalize feature rollouts. Invest in secure, standards-based APIs that simplify integration with enforcement and mobility platforms, enabling faster time to market for new services. Strengthen data governance and cybersecurity protocols to meet regulatory expectations and to build trust with municipalities and private operators.
Finally, deploy pilot programs that pair technology trials with clearly defined KPIs and expansion triggers, and develop outcome-based commercial models that align supplier incentives with operational performance. By taking these steps, organizations can reduce exposure to external shocks, improve user experience, and create more defensible and service-oriented business models.
Detailing the research methodology used to ensure robustness, triangulation and practical relevance in findings and recommendations
Detailing the research methodology used to ensure robustness, triangulation and practical relevance in findings and recommendations
The analysis is grounded in a mixed-method research approach that integrates primary and secondary evidence. Primary inputs include structured interviews with municipal procurement officials, private operators, lot owners, parking management companies, system integrators, and technology suppliers. These discussions provided firsthand perspectives on deployment challenges, procurement preferences, and technology adoption drivers.
Secondary research encompassed policy documents, technical specifications, vendor literature, and open-source reporting to contextualize primary insights and verify technical claims. Supply chain mapping and component-level assessment were performed to understand sourcing dependencies and tariff sensitivities, while technology assessments evaluated interoperability, upgradeability, and security posture across common device architectures. Throughout the process, findings were triangulated across multiple data sources and validated through follow-up interviews to ensure accuracy and practical relevance for stakeholders.
Concluding synthesis that highlights strategic priorities for operators, suppliers and policymakers navigating an evolving parking meter environment
Concluding synthesis that highlights strategic priorities for operators, suppliers and policymakers navigating an evolving parking meter environment
The parking meter ecosystem is at a pivotal moment where technology capabilities, policy expectations, and procurement realities intersect. Operators and suppliers that embrace modular architectures, diversify sourcing footprints, and invest in secure, flexible payment integrations will be better positioned to navigate tariff shocks and regulatory demands. Equally important is the need for closer collaboration between procurement, engineering and service teams to translate strategic objectives into operational plans that preserve uptime and user satisfaction.
Policy makers and municipal buyers should continue to emphasize data protection, sustainability, and interoperability when specifying systems, while also offering pathways for controlled pilots that validate benefits for both citizens and the city. Ultimately, success will hinge on the ability to convert data into actionable management insights, to adopt procurement mechanisms that balance cost with resilience, and to maintain a relentless focus on the end-user experience as a core metric for system performance.
Table of Contents
187 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Parking Meter Market, by Meter Type
- 8.1. Multi Space
- 8.1.1. Pay And Display
- 8.1.2. Pay Station
- 8.1.3. Plate Payment
- 8.2. Single Space
- 9. Parking Meter Market, by Payment Type
- 9.1. Card Operation
- 9.1.1. Credit Card
- 9.1.2. Debit Card
- 9.2. Coin Operation
- 9.3. Mobile Payment
- 9.3.1. App Based Payment
- 9.3.2. Nfc Payment
- 9.3.3. Qr Code Payment
- 10. Parking Meter Market, by Mounting Type
- 10.1. Pole-Mounted
- 10.2. Standalone/Free-Standing
- 10.3. Wall-Mounted
- 11. Parking Meter Market, by End User
- 11.1. Municipal
- 11.2. Private Operator
- 11.2.1. Lot Owner
- 11.2.2. Parking Management Company
- 12. Parking Meter Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Parking Meter Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Parking Meter Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. United States Parking Meter Market
- 16. China Parking Meter Market
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 17.5. Cale Access AB
- 17.6. CivicSmart Inc.
- 17.7. Cleverciti Systems GmbH
- 17.8. Duncan Solutions Inc.
- 17.9. Flowbird Group
- 17.10. Hectronic GmbH
- 17.11. IPS Group Inc.
- 17.12. J.J. MacKay Canada Limited
- 17.13. LocoMobi Inc.
- 17.14. Metric Group Ltd.
- 17.15. Meyertech Ltd.
- 17.16. Parkeon SA
- 17.17. ParkHelp Technologies
- 17.18. Parking BOXX
- 17.19. ParkMan Oy
- 17.20. ParkMobile LLC
- 17.21. Passport Labs Inc.
- 17.22. POM Inc.
- 17.23. Sigtec Pty Ltd.
- 17.24. Smarking Inc.
- 17.25. Streetline Inc.
- 17.26. T2 Systems Inc.
- 17.27. Ventek International
- FIGURE 1. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 2. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
- FIGURE 3. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
- FIGURE 4. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY METER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 5. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY PAYMENT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 6. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY MOUNTING TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 7. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 8. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 9. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 10. GLOBAL PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
- FIGURE 12. CHINA PARKING METER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
