Open Banking Solutions Market by Component (Services, Solutions), Banking Service (Account Information, Card Management, Credit Scoring), Deployment Model, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Open Banking Solutions Market was valued at USD 26.36 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 30.72 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 16.67%, reaching USD 90.55 billion by 2032.
A concise executive introduction that situates open banking evolution, strategic implications for incumbents and innovators, and the priority focus areas for leaders
Open banking has transitioned from a regulatory experiment to a foundational architecture shaping how financial services are designed, delivered, and consumed. This introduction frames the core forces reshaping the landscape, the practical implications for incumbents and challengers, and the operational areas where immediate attention will yield the largest strategic return.
Over the past decade, banks and fintechs have moved from isolated API pilots to interoperable ecosystems that connect account data, payments rails, identity services, and analytics in near real time. As a result, product roadmaps now emphasize developer experience, secure API exposures, and embedded finance partnerships. This shift compels senior leaders to rethink technology investments, vendor relationships, and go-to-market pathways in order to capture new revenue streams while reducing friction across customer journeys.
How regulatory clarity, evolving customer expectations, and cloud-native architectures are reshaping open banking business models and technology priorities
The open banking landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by regulatory maturation, changing customer expectations, and a recalibration of platform economics. Regulators in multiple jurisdictions have clarified rules that emphasize secure data portability and strong customer authentication, prompting banks and fintechs to harden identity, consent management, and fraud prevention capabilities. Concurrently, consumers and enterprises expect seamless, contextually relevant financial experiences embedded into broader digital journeys, which elevates the importance of APIs that deliver reliability, low latency, and strong developer tooling.
Technology trends are accelerating this transformation. The adoption of cloud-native architectures, containerization, and event-driven patterns has reduced time-to-market for new services, while also creating complexity in governance and risk control. Service providers are responding by rearchitecting solutions to include stronger observability, enhanced encryption, and modular authorization frameworks. As platforms and ecosystems proliferate, strategic differentiation increasingly hinges on the ability to offer composable capabilities-such as payments orchestration, identity verification, and analytics-via well-documented, secure APIs that third parties can integrate with minimal friction. These shifts necessitate a dual focus on innovation velocity and operational resilience to sustain growth under evolving regulatory and competitive pressures.
Evaluating how the cumulative impact of United States tariffs introduced in 2025 reshapes procurement strategies, vendor choices, and operational resiliency for open banking programs
The introduction of additional United States tariffs in 2025 introduces a new variable into global technology supply chains that undergirds many open banking deployments. These tariff changes can increase the cost base for hardware and certain software services that are sourced internationally, which in turn influences procurement timelines, vendor selection, and capital planning. Because open banking deployments often depend on a mix of on-premises appliances, specialized security hardware, and internationally sourced software components, procurement teams must reassess total cost of ownership and contractual terms to account for tariff-driven price adjustments.
Beyond procurement, tariffs have indirect operational implications. Vendors with global footprints may alter manufacturing locations, support models, and delivery timelines to mitigate tariff exposure, and these changes can affect integration roadmaps and SLAs. For organizations that prioritize cloud-first strategies, the immediate impact of tariffs may be muted relative to hardware-heavy implementations; however, cross-border data flows and managed service agreements can still carry cost and compliance implications. In response, financial institutions and technology providers should strengthen scenario planning, incorporate tariff assumptions into vendor negotiations, and accelerate migration pathways that reduce dependency on tariff-impacted supply chains, while maintaining a clear focus on security and regulatory compliance.
Definitive segmentation insights revealing how component choices, deployment models, API types, banking services, and application categories determine integration complexity and strategic opportunity
A clear segmentation framework illuminates the specific capability areas and deployment choices that determine both implementation complexity and competitive opportunity. When examining offerings by component, distinctions between Services and Solutions matter for resourcing and timelines; Services encompass consulting, implementation, and support & maintenance, while Solutions include API gateway, API management, authentication & authorization, data analytics & reporting, and security & risk management. This dual lens clarifies why some institutions choose to buy turnkey solutions and augment them with consulting and implementation services, whereas others invest predominantly in internal capabilities and ongoing support contracts to maintain tighter control over roadmap and compliance.
Deployment model choices exert a major influence on operational posture. Cloud and On-Premises models present divergent trade-offs: the Cloud pathway can be segmented into community cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud, and public cloud approaches, each offering distinct balances of control, scalability, and regulatory alignment; the On-Premises pathway subdivides into hosted and in-house models, which influence capital requirements, control over data residency, and integration cadence. These deployment distinctions interact with API end type considerations; private APIs versus public APIs shape partner ecosystems and security architectures, where private APIs further split into internal API and partner API use cases and public APIs emphasize developer portal, open API, and partner API implementations to broaden ecosystem engagement.
Banking service segmentation highlights the product-level choices that define customer value propositions. Account information, card management, credit scoring, customer authentication, and payment initiation represent core service verticals, where account information breaks down into consolidated information and real-time information capabilities, card management manifests as physical card versus virtual card strategies, credit scoring spans alternative and traditional credit scoring methods, customer authentication includes biometric authentication and two-factor authentication patterns, and payment initiation differentiates between cross-border payments and domestic payments. Finally, application-level segmentation clarifies go-to-market pathways and integration complexity: account aggregation platforms diversify into personal aggregation and SME aggregation, fraud detection systems distinguish between identity verification and transaction monitoring specialties, investment platforms cover robo-advisors and wealth management tools, lending platforms separate retail lending from SME lending, mobile wallets divide into merchant mobile wallets and P2P mobile wallets, payment gateways segment into e-commerce gateways and m-commerce gateways, and personal finance management offers budgeting tools alongside expense tracking solutions. Understanding how these segments interact helps leaders prioritize investments that align product capabilities to customer segments and compliance demands, while also optimizing vendor selection and integration sequencing.
Region-specific strategic considerations for open banking adoption that reconcile regulatory diversity, consumer behavior, and infrastructure differences across three major global regions
Regional dynamics continue to shape regulatory expectations, partnership models, and technology adoption patterns in open banking. In the Americas, competition between incumbents and fintech challengers has driven emphasis on payments innovation and embedded finance, with US-focused regulatory and commercial dynamics encouraging private-sector led interoperability initiatives and partnerships with technology platforms. This region tends to favor flexible deployment models and aggressive customer experience innovation, while also grappling with diverse state and federal compliance regimes that require careful legal and operational alignment.
The Europe, Middle East & Africa region presents a heterogeneous regulatory and market landscape. In Europe, regulatory milestones such as payment services directives and strong customer authentication rules have accelerated open banking adoption, catalyzing standardized APIs and consent frameworks. The Middle East and Africa demonstrate varied maturity levels, where a mix of national strategies and leapfrog mobile-first adoption patterns create fertile ground for digital wallets, identity innovations, and cross-border payment solutions. Across this broad region, data localization, identity frameworks, and partnership ecosystems differ markedly, necessitating region-specific implementation designs.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid mobile adoption, wide use of e-commerce platforms, and progressive digital identity initiatives have driven high consumer engagement with embedded financial services. Many jurisdictions emphasize public–private collaboration to scale digital payments and identity verification, resulting in unique deployment patterns such as super-app integrations and platform-driven financial services. Consequently, organizations operating across these regions must design adaptable solutions that respect regional regulatory nuance, local consumer preferences, and infrastructure realities while preserving a consistent approach to security and developer experience.
Key competitive behaviors and capability investments by leading providers showing how platform modularity, developer experience, and embedded security drive enterprise adoption
Industry leaders are differentiating by combining robust platform engineering with focused domain expertise, strategic partnerships, and strong developer engagement models. Successful providers typically invest in modular, API-first architectures that enable rapid composition of payments, identity, and analytics capabilities; they also prioritize developer portals, sandbox environments, and comprehensive documentation to reduce integration friction for partners. In parallel, firms that specialize in services-consulting, implementation, and support-complement these platform strengths by offering migration roadmaps, regulatory readiness assessments, and operational playbooks.
Competitive dynamics favor vendors that can demonstrate enterprise-grade security and risk management, because trust remains the primary barrier to third-party integration. As a result, companies that embed advanced authentication flows, continuous monitoring, and automated compliance controls into their offerings tend to win larger enterprise engagements. Additionally, strategic alliances between technology providers, system integrators, and fintech innovators help accelerate market entry and extend geographic reach. For purchasers, evaluating vendors on the basis of integration flexibility, industry-specific capabilities, and post-deployment support performance is increasingly important, and partnerships that enable co-innovation with lead customers often signal durable differentiation.
Actionable strategic recommendations for technology and risk leaders to prioritize identity foundations, API composability, hybrid deployment governance, and partner enablement for sustained growth
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, phased strategy that aligns technology investments with compliance timelines and customer experience objectives. First, prioritize establishing a strong consent and identity foundation that supports both regulatory requirements and frictionless user journeys; this includes deploying resilient authentication methods, consent orchestration, and clear audit trails. By consolidating identity and consent controls early, organizations reduce integration risk and create a reusable layer that accelerates subsequent product launches.
Second, design for composability: select API gateway and API management solutions that enable microservice-level control, fine-grained authorization, and observability to support rapid feature releases without sacrificing governance. Simultaneously, favor deployment models that balance regulatory data residency needs with operational efficiency, for example adopting hybrid approaches where sensitive workloads remain on-premises while scalable analytics and developer tooling use cloud resources. Finally, invest in partner enablement through high-quality developer documentation, sandbox environments, and joint go-to-market programs, and ensure that procurement and legal teams build flexible contracts that accommodate supply-chain disruptions such as tariff-induced supplier changes. These coordinated actions will help leaders capture ecosystem value while maintaining resilient operations.
A transparent research methodology combining primary executive interviews, technical capability analysis, regulatory review, and iterative expert validation to ensure actionable and regionally relevant findings
This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs to produce a structured, evidence-based view of open banking dynamics. The methodology combined primary interviews with senior executives, product leaders, and technology architects across banks, fintechs, and solution providers to capture first-hand perspectives on implementation priorities, operational challenges, and success metrics. These primary insights were triangulated with technology trend analysis, vendor capability mappings, and a review of regulatory developments to ensure that findings reflect both strategic intent and operational reality.
Analytical rigor was further maintained through iterative validation workshops with subject matter experts to refine segmentation definitions, deployment trade-offs, and use-case illustrations. The research also employed comparative feature analysis across solution categories-including API gateway, API management, authentication & authorization, data analytics & reporting, and security & risk management-to identify implementation patterns and vendor differentiation. Throughout the process, attention to data governance, compliance constraints, and regional nuance ensured that recommendations are actionable for practitioners operating in diverse jurisdictions.
A concise conclusion emphasizing the imperative for continuous capability-building in identity, composable platforms, partner governance, and operational resilience for open banking success
Open banking represents a strategic inflection point for financial services where technology, regulation, and customer expectations converge to create new avenues for value creation. Organizations that move decisively to build strong identity and consent foundations, embrace composable architectures, and optimize deployment models for regulatory and operational requirements will be best positioned to capture ecosystem opportunities. At the same time, rising complexity in supply chains and regulatory obligations underscores the need for robust scenario planning and vendor governance.
In closing, leaders should treat open banking not as a point-in-time project but as a continuous capability that requires ongoing investment in developer experience, security, and partner relationships. By focusing on modular platforms, rigorous risk controls, and pragmatic implementation sequencing, institutions can accelerate innovation while safeguarding customer trust and regulatory compliance.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise executive introduction that situates open banking evolution, strategic implications for incumbents and innovators, and the priority focus areas for leaders
Open banking has transitioned from a regulatory experiment to a foundational architecture shaping how financial services are designed, delivered, and consumed. This introduction frames the core forces reshaping the landscape, the practical implications for incumbents and challengers, and the operational areas where immediate attention will yield the largest strategic return.
Over the past decade, banks and fintechs have moved from isolated API pilots to interoperable ecosystems that connect account data, payments rails, identity services, and analytics in near real time. As a result, product roadmaps now emphasize developer experience, secure API exposures, and embedded finance partnerships. This shift compels senior leaders to rethink technology investments, vendor relationships, and go-to-market pathways in order to capture new revenue streams while reducing friction across customer journeys.
How regulatory clarity, evolving customer expectations, and cloud-native architectures are reshaping open banking business models and technology priorities
The open banking landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by regulatory maturation, changing customer expectations, and a recalibration of platform economics. Regulators in multiple jurisdictions have clarified rules that emphasize secure data portability and strong customer authentication, prompting banks and fintechs to harden identity, consent management, and fraud prevention capabilities. Concurrently, consumers and enterprises expect seamless, contextually relevant financial experiences embedded into broader digital journeys, which elevates the importance of APIs that deliver reliability, low latency, and strong developer tooling.
Technology trends are accelerating this transformation. The adoption of cloud-native architectures, containerization, and event-driven patterns has reduced time-to-market for new services, while also creating complexity in governance and risk control. Service providers are responding by rearchitecting solutions to include stronger observability, enhanced encryption, and modular authorization frameworks. As platforms and ecosystems proliferate, strategic differentiation increasingly hinges on the ability to offer composable capabilities-such as payments orchestration, identity verification, and analytics-via well-documented, secure APIs that third parties can integrate with minimal friction. These shifts necessitate a dual focus on innovation velocity and operational resilience to sustain growth under evolving regulatory and competitive pressures.
Evaluating how the cumulative impact of United States tariffs introduced in 2025 reshapes procurement strategies, vendor choices, and operational resiliency for open banking programs
The introduction of additional United States tariffs in 2025 introduces a new variable into global technology supply chains that undergirds many open banking deployments. These tariff changes can increase the cost base for hardware and certain software services that are sourced internationally, which in turn influences procurement timelines, vendor selection, and capital planning. Because open banking deployments often depend on a mix of on-premises appliances, specialized security hardware, and internationally sourced software components, procurement teams must reassess total cost of ownership and contractual terms to account for tariff-driven price adjustments.
Beyond procurement, tariffs have indirect operational implications. Vendors with global footprints may alter manufacturing locations, support models, and delivery timelines to mitigate tariff exposure, and these changes can affect integration roadmaps and SLAs. For organizations that prioritize cloud-first strategies, the immediate impact of tariffs may be muted relative to hardware-heavy implementations; however, cross-border data flows and managed service agreements can still carry cost and compliance implications. In response, financial institutions and technology providers should strengthen scenario planning, incorporate tariff assumptions into vendor negotiations, and accelerate migration pathways that reduce dependency on tariff-impacted supply chains, while maintaining a clear focus on security and regulatory compliance.
Definitive segmentation insights revealing how component choices, deployment models, API types, banking services, and application categories determine integration complexity and strategic opportunity
A clear segmentation framework illuminates the specific capability areas and deployment choices that determine both implementation complexity and competitive opportunity. When examining offerings by component, distinctions between Services and Solutions matter for resourcing and timelines; Services encompass consulting, implementation, and support & maintenance, while Solutions include API gateway, API management, authentication & authorization, data analytics & reporting, and security & risk management. This dual lens clarifies why some institutions choose to buy turnkey solutions and augment them with consulting and implementation services, whereas others invest predominantly in internal capabilities and ongoing support contracts to maintain tighter control over roadmap and compliance.
Deployment model choices exert a major influence on operational posture. Cloud and On-Premises models present divergent trade-offs: the Cloud pathway can be segmented into community cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud, and public cloud approaches, each offering distinct balances of control, scalability, and regulatory alignment; the On-Premises pathway subdivides into hosted and in-house models, which influence capital requirements, control over data residency, and integration cadence. These deployment distinctions interact with API end type considerations; private APIs versus public APIs shape partner ecosystems and security architectures, where private APIs further split into internal API and partner API use cases and public APIs emphasize developer portal, open API, and partner API implementations to broaden ecosystem engagement.
Banking service segmentation highlights the product-level choices that define customer value propositions. Account information, card management, credit scoring, customer authentication, and payment initiation represent core service verticals, where account information breaks down into consolidated information and real-time information capabilities, card management manifests as physical card versus virtual card strategies, credit scoring spans alternative and traditional credit scoring methods, customer authentication includes biometric authentication and two-factor authentication patterns, and payment initiation differentiates between cross-border payments and domestic payments. Finally, application-level segmentation clarifies go-to-market pathways and integration complexity: account aggregation platforms diversify into personal aggregation and SME aggregation, fraud detection systems distinguish between identity verification and transaction monitoring specialties, investment platforms cover robo-advisors and wealth management tools, lending platforms separate retail lending from SME lending, mobile wallets divide into merchant mobile wallets and P2P mobile wallets, payment gateways segment into e-commerce gateways and m-commerce gateways, and personal finance management offers budgeting tools alongside expense tracking solutions. Understanding how these segments interact helps leaders prioritize investments that align product capabilities to customer segments and compliance demands, while also optimizing vendor selection and integration sequencing.
Region-specific strategic considerations for open banking adoption that reconcile regulatory diversity, consumer behavior, and infrastructure differences across three major global regions
Regional dynamics continue to shape regulatory expectations, partnership models, and technology adoption patterns in open banking. In the Americas, competition between incumbents and fintech challengers has driven emphasis on payments innovation and embedded finance, with US-focused regulatory and commercial dynamics encouraging private-sector led interoperability initiatives and partnerships with technology platforms. This region tends to favor flexible deployment models and aggressive customer experience innovation, while also grappling with diverse state and federal compliance regimes that require careful legal and operational alignment.
The Europe, Middle East & Africa region presents a heterogeneous regulatory and market landscape. In Europe, regulatory milestones such as payment services directives and strong customer authentication rules have accelerated open banking adoption, catalyzing standardized APIs and consent frameworks. The Middle East and Africa demonstrate varied maturity levels, where a mix of national strategies and leapfrog mobile-first adoption patterns create fertile ground for digital wallets, identity innovations, and cross-border payment solutions. Across this broad region, data localization, identity frameworks, and partnership ecosystems differ markedly, necessitating region-specific implementation designs.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid mobile adoption, wide use of e-commerce platforms, and progressive digital identity initiatives have driven high consumer engagement with embedded financial services. Many jurisdictions emphasize public–private collaboration to scale digital payments and identity verification, resulting in unique deployment patterns such as super-app integrations and platform-driven financial services. Consequently, organizations operating across these regions must design adaptable solutions that respect regional regulatory nuance, local consumer preferences, and infrastructure realities while preserving a consistent approach to security and developer experience.
Key competitive behaviors and capability investments by leading providers showing how platform modularity, developer experience, and embedded security drive enterprise adoption
Industry leaders are differentiating by combining robust platform engineering with focused domain expertise, strategic partnerships, and strong developer engagement models. Successful providers typically invest in modular, API-first architectures that enable rapid composition of payments, identity, and analytics capabilities; they also prioritize developer portals, sandbox environments, and comprehensive documentation to reduce integration friction for partners. In parallel, firms that specialize in services-consulting, implementation, and support-complement these platform strengths by offering migration roadmaps, regulatory readiness assessments, and operational playbooks.
Competitive dynamics favor vendors that can demonstrate enterprise-grade security and risk management, because trust remains the primary barrier to third-party integration. As a result, companies that embed advanced authentication flows, continuous monitoring, and automated compliance controls into their offerings tend to win larger enterprise engagements. Additionally, strategic alliances between technology providers, system integrators, and fintech innovators help accelerate market entry and extend geographic reach. For purchasers, evaluating vendors on the basis of integration flexibility, industry-specific capabilities, and post-deployment support performance is increasingly important, and partnerships that enable co-innovation with lead customers often signal durable differentiation.
Actionable strategic recommendations for technology and risk leaders to prioritize identity foundations, API composability, hybrid deployment governance, and partner enablement for sustained growth
Industry leaders should adopt a pragmatic, phased strategy that aligns technology investments with compliance timelines and customer experience objectives. First, prioritize establishing a strong consent and identity foundation that supports both regulatory requirements and frictionless user journeys; this includes deploying resilient authentication methods, consent orchestration, and clear audit trails. By consolidating identity and consent controls early, organizations reduce integration risk and create a reusable layer that accelerates subsequent product launches.
Second, design for composability: select API gateway and API management solutions that enable microservice-level control, fine-grained authorization, and observability to support rapid feature releases without sacrificing governance. Simultaneously, favor deployment models that balance regulatory data residency needs with operational efficiency, for example adopting hybrid approaches where sensitive workloads remain on-premises while scalable analytics and developer tooling use cloud resources. Finally, invest in partner enablement through high-quality developer documentation, sandbox environments, and joint go-to-market programs, and ensure that procurement and legal teams build flexible contracts that accommodate supply-chain disruptions such as tariff-induced supplier changes. These coordinated actions will help leaders capture ecosystem value while maintaining resilient operations.
A transparent research methodology combining primary executive interviews, technical capability analysis, regulatory review, and iterative expert validation to ensure actionable and regionally relevant findings
This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs to produce a structured, evidence-based view of open banking dynamics. The methodology combined primary interviews with senior executives, product leaders, and technology architects across banks, fintechs, and solution providers to capture first-hand perspectives on implementation priorities, operational challenges, and success metrics. These primary insights were triangulated with technology trend analysis, vendor capability mappings, and a review of regulatory developments to ensure that findings reflect both strategic intent and operational reality.
Analytical rigor was further maintained through iterative validation workshops with subject matter experts to refine segmentation definitions, deployment trade-offs, and use-case illustrations. The research also employed comparative feature analysis across solution categories-including API gateway, API management, authentication & authorization, data analytics & reporting, and security & risk management-to identify implementation patterns and vendor differentiation. Throughout the process, attention to data governance, compliance constraints, and regional nuance ensured that recommendations are actionable for practitioners operating in diverse jurisdictions.
A concise conclusion emphasizing the imperative for continuous capability-building in identity, composable platforms, partner governance, and operational resilience for open banking success
Open banking represents a strategic inflection point for financial services where technology, regulation, and customer expectations converge to create new avenues for value creation. Organizations that move decisively to build strong identity and consent foundations, embrace composable architectures, and optimize deployment models for regulatory and operational requirements will be best positioned to capture ecosystem opportunities. At the same time, rising complexity in supply chains and regulatory obligations underscores the need for robust scenario planning and vendor governance.
In closing, leaders should treat open banking not as a point-in-time project but as a continuous capability that requires ongoing investment in developer experience, security, and partner relationships. By focusing on modular platforms, rigorous risk controls, and pragmatic implementation sequencing, institutions can accelerate innovation while safeguarding customer trust and regulatory compliance.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing demand for API governance frameworks to ensure secure open banking data sharing
- 5.2. Emergence of AI-driven personalized financial services leveraging open banking data analytics
- 5.3. Integration of real-time payment initiation services into core banking platforms through APIs
- 5.4. Regulatory alignment efforts across jurisdictions to standardize open banking interoperability standards
- 5.5. Adoption of embedded banking experiences by nonfinancial platforms through open banking integrations
- 5.6. Heightened focus on customer consent management solutions for transparent data access within open banking
- 5.7. Deployment of blockchain-based open banking ecosystems to enhance transaction security and traceability
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Component
- 8.1. Services
- 8.1.1. Consulting
- 8.1.2. Implementation
- 8.1.3. Support & Maintenance
- 8.2. Solutions
- 8.2.1. API Gateway
- 8.2.2. API Management
- 8.2.3. Authentication & Authorization
- 8.2.4. Data Analytics & Reporting
- 8.2.5. Security & Risk Management
- 9. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Banking Service
- 9.1. Account Information
- 9.1.1. Consolidated Information
- 9.1.2. Real-Time Information
- 9.2. Card Management
- 9.2.1. Physical Card
- 9.2.2. Virtual Card
- 9.3. Credit Scoring
- 9.3.1. Alternative Credit Scoring
- 9.3.2. Traditional Credit Scoring
- 9.4. Customer Authentication
- 9.4.1. Biometric Authentication
- 9.4.2. Two-Factor Authentication
- 9.5. Payment Initiation
- 9.5.1. Cross-Border Payments
- 9.5.2. Domestic Payments
- 10. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Deployment Model
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.1.1. Community Cloud
- 10.1.2. Hybrid Cloud
- 10.1.3. Private Cloud
- 10.1.4. Public Cloud
- 10.2. On-Premises
- 10.2.1. Hosted
- 10.2.2. In-House
- 11. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Application
- 11.1. Account Aggregation Platforms
- 11.1.1. Personal Aggregation
- 11.1.2. SME Aggregation
- 11.2. Fraud Detection Systems
- 11.2.1. Identity Verification
- 11.2.2. Transaction Monitoring
- 11.3. Investment Platforms
- 11.3.1. Robo-Advisors
- 11.3.2. Wealth Management Tools
- 11.4. Lending Platforms
- 11.4.1. Retail Lending
- 11.4.2. SME Lending
- 11.5. Mobile Wallets
- 11.5.1. Merchant Mobile Wallets
- 11.5.2. P2P Mobile Wallets
- 11.6. Payment Gateways
- 11.6.1. E-Commerce Gateways
- 11.6.2. M-Commerce Gateways
- 11.7. Personal Finance Management
- 11.7.1. Budgeting Tools
- 11.7.2. Expense Tracking
- 12. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Open Banking Solutions Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Alkami Technology Inc.
- 15.3.2. Amplify Platform. by TrillerNet
- 15.3.3. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. by PNC Financial Services
- 15.3.4. Bud Financial
- 15.3.5. Cashfree Payments India Private Limited
- 15.3.6. Codat Limited
- 15.3.7. Crédit Agricole CIB
- 15.3.8. Cross River Bank
- 15.3.9. DirectID
- 15.3.10. Finastra
- 15.3.11. Fincity by Mastercard
- 15.3.12. Flinks
- 15.3.13. GoCardless Ltd.
- 15.3.14. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
- 15.3.15. M2P Solutions Private Limited
- 15.3.16. Minna Technologies AB
- 15.3.17. Nubank
- 15.3.18. Plaid Inc. by Visa
- 15.3.19. Railsbank Technology Ltd.
- 15.3.20. Salt Edge
- 15.3.21. Stitch
- 15.3.22. Stripe, Inc.
- 15.3.23. Token.io Ltd.
- 15.3.24. TrueLayer Ltd.
- 15.3.25. Yodlee by Envestnet
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
