Olefin Market by Product Type (Butadiene, Ethylene, Propylene), Technology (Catalytic Dehydrogenation, Metathesis, Steam Cracking), Grade, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Olefin Market was valued at USD 189.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 199.97 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.91%, reaching USD 299.41 billion by 2032.
An authoritative primer on the strategic role of olefins across industrial value chains, feedstock dynamics, and downstream quality requirements for decision-makers
Olefins constitute the chemical backbone of modern industrial value chains, serving as primary feedstocks and intermediates for a broad spectrum of polymers, solvents, elastomers, and chemical derivatives. Their importance spans basic commodity production to specialized applications where molecular purity and grade differentiation determine downstream performance. Over recent years, supply dynamics have shifted in response to feedstock availability, technological advances in cracking and dehydrogenation, and evolving regulatory and sustainability expectations.
Understanding olefins requires integrating upstream feedstock sourcing, midstream processing capabilities, and downstream conversion routes. Feedstock economics influence choices between steam cracking and catalytic dehydrogenation pathways, while technology selection shapes capital intensity, operational flexibility, and product quality. Simultaneously, demand patterns are being reshaped by sectoral transitions in packaging, automotive lightweighting, and industrial coatings, which place different priorities on polymer grade, mechanical properties, and lifecycle impacts.
This introduction frames olefins not merely as commodities but as strategic inputs whose behavior underpins manufacturing competitiveness. The subsequent sections examine how transformative shifts are altering production footprints and trade flows, how trade policy interventions could ripple through procurement and logistics, and how segmentation, regional contrasts, and corporate strategies converge to define near-term resilience and medium-term structural change.
How advances in production technology, feedstock flexibility, and sustainability-driven investments are recalibrating competitive advantage and supply chain resilience in olefins
The olefin value chain is experiencing a series of transformative shifts driven by technology, feedstock realignment, and regulatory pressure to decarbonize. Advances in catalytic dehydrogenation have expanded options for on-purpose propylene production, enabling producers to reduce reliance on traditional steam cracking units and to manage feedstock flexibility with greater precision. Concurrently, refiners and petrochemical producers are optimizing steam cracking configurations to accommodate a wider range of feeds, including ethane, LPG, and naphtha fractions, which changes the scale and location economics of production.
Sustainability imperatives are accelerating investment in lower-emission production routes, greater energy efficiency, and circular feedstock adoption. This transition is not uniform: some players prioritize incremental retrofits to existing assets while others pursue greenfield projects that embed lower-carbon technologies. At the same time, digitalization and advanced process control are improving plant reliability and yield optimization, shifting competitive advantage toward organizations that can integrate operational data into strategic planning.
These shifts are reshaping supply chains, prompting buyers to reconsider sourcing geographies and contract structures and prompting licensors and EPC firms to re-evaluate technology roadmaps. The resulting landscape is one where agility, feedstock optionality, and demonstrable sustainability credentials determine who captures the most resilient margins as market conditions evolve.
Evaluating the cascading operational and commercial consequences of 2025 United States tariff measures on trade flows, sourcing strategies, and supplier negotiations within the olefin ecosystem
Proposed tariff measures announced for implementation in 2025 create a backdrop of elevated trade risk that industry participants must integrate into procurement, capacity planning, and commercial strategy. Tariff actions influence the total landed cost of imported intermediates and finished polymers, shifting the relative competitiveness of domestic versus imported supply and changing the calculus for long-term investment in local processing or conversion assets.
In practice, tariffs compress arbitrage opportunities that previously smoothed regional imbalances, which encourages sourcing diversification and stronger emphasis on near-sourcing where feasible. Producers with flexible feedstock configurations and integrated downstream capabilities are better positioned to absorb incremental cost pressures because they can re-route production or capture value internally rather than relying on third-party suppliers. Conversely, merchant traders and standalone converters that lack integrated logistics or hedging strategies face increased margin volatility and may need to renegotiate supply terms to maintain throughput.
Tariff-induced realignments also prompt an uptick in contract renegotiations, longer-term bilateral agreements, and the exploration of alternative trade corridors. Logistics planning grows more complex as shippers and purchasers model tariff ladders alongside freight and energy cost fluctuations. The net effect is a heightened premium on strategic visibility of supply chains, proactive supplier engagement, and scenario-based commercial planning that anticipates policy-driven shocks.
Segment-centric intelligence illuminating how product, technology, grade, and end-use intersections determine resilience, price exposure, and innovation priorities across the olefin chain
A segmentation-aware approach provides nuanced insight into where value and risk concentrate across product types, technology routes, grades, and end-use channels. Based on product type, markets differentiate between Butadiene, Ethylene, and Propylene with distinct end markets and processing demands; Butadiene is often classified further into chemical grade and rubber monomer grade where polymerization performance and impurity thresholds matter, Ethylene separates into chemical grade and polymer grade reflecting divergent purity and downstream polymerization requirements, and Propylene is commonly segmented into chemical grade and polymer grade which determine suitability for derivative production versus polymer manufacture.
Based on technology, production choices-Catalytic Dehydrogenation, Metathesis, and Steam Cracking-drive capital intensity, feedstock dependence, and throughput flexibility; Catalytic Dehydrogenation itself bifurcates into butane dehydrogenation and propane dehydrogenation routes while Steam Cracking is executed across ethane cracking, LPG cracking, and naphtha cracking pathways, each with unique yield patterns and energy profiles. Based on grade, the market is studied across Chemical, Fuel, and Polymer classifications with chemical grades further defined into industrial and technical grades, fuel grades distinguished as fuel gas and fuel oil, and polymer grades encompassing high-density, linear low-density, and low-density variants that determine final application performance.
Based on end use industry, demand drivers vary markedly across Agriculture, Automotive, Construction, Packaging, and Textile sectors; within Agriculture, specialty films such as greenhouse and mulch films impose specific durability criteria; Automotive applications split into exterior and interior requirements with differing thermal and mechanical constraints; Construction uses olefin-derived products in flooring, insulation, and pipes & fittings where fire performance and longevity are prioritized; Packaging demands a clear divide between flexible and rigid formats with regulatory and sustainability obligations shaping material selection. Understanding these layered segmentations reveals which combinations of product type, technology route, grade, and end-use industry yield the most robust margins and which are most exposed to supply disruption or regulatory change.
Regional contrasts in feedstock access, policy frameworks, and demand composition shaping strategic production, investment, and logistics decisions across global olefin markets
Regional perspectives matter because production economics, feedstock endowments, policy frameworks, and demand patterns diverge significantly across global regions. In the Americas, a combination of abundant natural gas liquids in select basins and integrated refining-petrochemical complexes drive competitive advantages for ethane-based cracking and related downstream polymer chains, while logistical capability and proximity to major polymer converters influence where investment is concentrated. Stakeholders in this region are also attuned to trade policy shifts that can rapidly alter export flows and reprice imports.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous picture where regulatory stringency, circularity mandates, and proximity to diversified feedstock sources create complex trade-offs. While some markets prioritize decarbonization and recycled content obligations that favor investments in lower-emission production and advanced recycling, other markets within the region emphasize feedstock security and downstream processing capability. Infrastructure constraints and cross-border customs regimes add layers of complexity to supply planning.
Asia-Pacific remains the largest end-demand engine for many olefin derivatives, underpinned by manufacturing scale in packaging, textiles, and automotive components. The region's growth has prompted significant capacity additions, investments in both steam cracking and on-purpose technologies, and an evolving policy landscape that increasingly incorporates environmental performance metrics. Taken together, these regional dynamics mean that companies must tailor commercial strategies not just at the national level but with a clear view of cross-border logistics, regulatory compliance, and customer preference trajectories.
Insightful competitive analysis revealing how asset integration, technology partnerships, and sustainability credentials shape market positioning and negotiation leverage in the olefin sector
Competitive dynamics in the olefin sector hinge on a combination of asset footprint, technology mastery, feedstock flexibility, and commercial channel breadth. Leading integrated producers maintain advantages where they combine upstream feedstock access with midstream processing and downstream conversion, allowing them to internalize margin capture and to pivot volumes in response to supply disruptions or demand shifts. Merchant producers and traders play a complementary role by providing liquidity and arbitrage opportunities across regional markets, but they are exposed to inventory and logistics cost swings when trade frictions intensify.
Technology licensors, catalysts providers, and engineering firms represent another cluster of strategic importance; their roadmaps influence which production pathways scale and how quickly new efficiency measures propagate through the industry. Strategic partnerships between licensors and producers accelerate technology transfer and shorten the commercialization timeline for novel processes, while joint ventures and offtake agreements help de-risk capital-intensive projects.
Mergers, bolt-on acquisitions, and capacity rationalization are recurring themes as companies seek scale in feedstock procurement, logistics, and downstream outlets. Competitive differentiation increasingly rests on demonstrable progress in emissions intensity reduction, adoption of circular feedstocks, and the ability to offer customers transparent lifecycle metrics. Firms that combine operational excellence with credible sustainability credentials will command stronger bargaining positions with major converters and brand owners.
Practical strategic moves and operational changes that leaders should implement now to enhance supply chain resilience, accelerate decarbonization, and protect commercial margins under evolving market pressures
Industry leaders should adopt a layered strategy that addresses immediate resilience needs while positioning for structural transformation. Tighten supply chain visibility by integrating real-time logistics and procurement data into scenario planning processes to anticipate tariff shocks, feedstock dislocations, or freight volatility. Concurrently, expand feedstock optionality through contractual arrangements and strategic inventory buffers that reduce single-source exposure and enable rapid rerouting between steam cracking and on-purpose production when feedstock economics shift.
Accelerate selective investments in process improvements and low-carbon technology pilots that deliver measurable reductions in energy intensity and emissions footprint, prioritizing retrofit opportunities with short payback horizons and scalable impact. Strengthen commercial contracts to include flexible pricing mechanisms and force majeure clauses that reflect contemporary policy risks, and develop closer partnerships with key customers to co-design product specifications that support circular material flows and recycled content integration.
Finally, upskill teams across procurement, operations, and commercial functions to interpret complex scenario outputs and to act decisively. Embedding cross-functional decision protocols and clear governance for rapid response will convert market intelligence into timely operational moves and contracting choices that preserve margin and market access.
A transparent explanation of the research approach combining secondary analysis, expert interviews, and data triangulation to underpin findings with verifiable technical and commercial evidence
This research combines structured secondary research, targeted primary interviews, and rigorous data triangulation to ensure robust findings and defensible conclusions. Secondary inputs include technical literature, regulatory texts, public filings, and trade statistics that establish historical context and verify technical parameters such as process yields, typical impurity tolerances, and common grade specifications. Primary research incorporates interviews with senior industry practitioners across production, procurement, and technology provider roles to surface real-world constraints, investment rationales, and emerging strategic behaviors.
Data triangulation involves cross-referencing production configurations, technology adoption timelines, and trade flow indicators to validate narrative conclusions. Analytical frameworks employed include scenario analysis to model policy and feedstock shocks, sensitivity testing to identify critical cost and throughput drivers, and qualitative value chain mapping to expose points of concentrated risk or opportunity. Quality control measures entail independent peer review of technical assumptions and iterative refinement with domain experts to confirm interpretive accuracy.
Transparency about methodology, data limitations, and areas of higher uncertainty is maintained throughout the analysis, enabling readers to gauge confidence levels and to align the evidence base with their own internal models or due diligence processes.
A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives and operational priorities that executives must act on to navigate disruptions and capture value in the changing olefin environment
The evolving olefin landscape presents both challenges and opportunities that require deliberate, informed action. Structural shifts in technology and feedstock sourcing are redefining production economics, while policy interventions and sustainability expectations add new dimensions to commercial decision-making. Together, these forces favor organizations that blend operational adaptability with strategic foresight, invest selectively in lower-carbon technologies, and cultivate closer commercial partnerships across the value chain.
Executives should prioritize visibility into supply chains, flexible contracting, and investments that yield both immediate resilience benefits and longer-term strategic optionality. By aligning procurement, technical, and commercial agendas and by using scenario-based planning as a regular discipline, organizations can reduce exposure to policy shocks and capture the upside from shifts in regional competitiveness and product mix. In short, staying competitive in the olefin sector will depend on the ability to translate market intelligence into coordinated operational choices and targeted capital allocation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative primer on the strategic role of olefins across industrial value chains, feedstock dynamics, and downstream quality requirements for decision-makers
Olefins constitute the chemical backbone of modern industrial value chains, serving as primary feedstocks and intermediates for a broad spectrum of polymers, solvents, elastomers, and chemical derivatives. Their importance spans basic commodity production to specialized applications where molecular purity and grade differentiation determine downstream performance. Over recent years, supply dynamics have shifted in response to feedstock availability, technological advances in cracking and dehydrogenation, and evolving regulatory and sustainability expectations.
Understanding olefins requires integrating upstream feedstock sourcing, midstream processing capabilities, and downstream conversion routes. Feedstock economics influence choices between steam cracking and catalytic dehydrogenation pathways, while technology selection shapes capital intensity, operational flexibility, and product quality. Simultaneously, demand patterns are being reshaped by sectoral transitions in packaging, automotive lightweighting, and industrial coatings, which place different priorities on polymer grade, mechanical properties, and lifecycle impacts.
This introduction frames olefins not merely as commodities but as strategic inputs whose behavior underpins manufacturing competitiveness. The subsequent sections examine how transformative shifts are altering production footprints and trade flows, how trade policy interventions could ripple through procurement and logistics, and how segmentation, regional contrasts, and corporate strategies converge to define near-term resilience and medium-term structural change.
How advances in production technology, feedstock flexibility, and sustainability-driven investments are recalibrating competitive advantage and supply chain resilience in olefins
The olefin value chain is experiencing a series of transformative shifts driven by technology, feedstock realignment, and regulatory pressure to decarbonize. Advances in catalytic dehydrogenation have expanded options for on-purpose propylene production, enabling producers to reduce reliance on traditional steam cracking units and to manage feedstock flexibility with greater precision. Concurrently, refiners and petrochemical producers are optimizing steam cracking configurations to accommodate a wider range of feeds, including ethane, LPG, and naphtha fractions, which changes the scale and location economics of production.
Sustainability imperatives are accelerating investment in lower-emission production routes, greater energy efficiency, and circular feedstock adoption. This transition is not uniform: some players prioritize incremental retrofits to existing assets while others pursue greenfield projects that embed lower-carbon technologies. At the same time, digitalization and advanced process control are improving plant reliability and yield optimization, shifting competitive advantage toward organizations that can integrate operational data into strategic planning.
These shifts are reshaping supply chains, prompting buyers to reconsider sourcing geographies and contract structures and prompting licensors and EPC firms to re-evaluate technology roadmaps. The resulting landscape is one where agility, feedstock optionality, and demonstrable sustainability credentials determine who captures the most resilient margins as market conditions evolve.
Evaluating the cascading operational and commercial consequences of 2025 United States tariff measures on trade flows, sourcing strategies, and supplier negotiations within the olefin ecosystem
Proposed tariff measures announced for implementation in 2025 create a backdrop of elevated trade risk that industry participants must integrate into procurement, capacity planning, and commercial strategy. Tariff actions influence the total landed cost of imported intermediates and finished polymers, shifting the relative competitiveness of domestic versus imported supply and changing the calculus for long-term investment in local processing or conversion assets.
In practice, tariffs compress arbitrage opportunities that previously smoothed regional imbalances, which encourages sourcing diversification and stronger emphasis on near-sourcing where feasible. Producers with flexible feedstock configurations and integrated downstream capabilities are better positioned to absorb incremental cost pressures because they can re-route production or capture value internally rather than relying on third-party suppliers. Conversely, merchant traders and standalone converters that lack integrated logistics or hedging strategies face increased margin volatility and may need to renegotiate supply terms to maintain throughput.
Tariff-induced realignments also prompt an uptick in contract renegotiations, longer-term bilateral agreements, and the exploration of alternative trade corridors. Logistics planning grows more complex as shippers and purchasers model tariff ladders alongside freight and energy cost fluctuations. The net effect is a heightened premium on strategic visibility of supply chains, proactive supplier engagement, and scenario-based commercial planning that anticipates policy-driven shocks.
Segment-centric intelligence illuminating how product, technology, grade, and end-use intersections determine resilience, price exposure, and innovation priorities across the olefin chain
A segmentation-aware approach provides nuanced insight into where value and risk concentrate across product types, technology routes, grades, and end-use channels. Based on product type, markets differentiate between Butadiene, Ethylene, and Propylene with distinct end markets and processing demands; Butadiene is often classified further into chemical grade and rubber monomer grade where polymerization performance and impurity thresholds matter, Ethylene separates into chemical grade and polymer grade reflecting divergent purity and downstream polymerization requirements, and Propylene is commonly segmented into chemical grade and polymer grade which determine suitability for derivative production versus polymer manufacture.
Based on technology, production choices-Catalytic Dehydrogenation, Metathesis, and Steam Cracking-drive capital intensity, feedstock dependence, and throughput flexibility; Catalytic Dehydrogenation itself bifurcates into butane dehydrogenation and propane dehydrogenation routes while Steam Cracking is executed across ethane cracking, LPG cracking, and naphtha cracking pathways, each with unique yield patterns and energy profiles. Based on grade, the market is studied across Chemical, Fuel, and Polymer classifications with chemical grades further defined into industrial and technical grades, fuel grades distinguished as fuel gas and fuel oil, and polymer grades encompassing high-density, linear low-density, and low-density variants that determine final application performance.
Based on end use industry, demand drivers vary markedly across Agriculture, Automotive, Construction, Packaging, and Textile sectors; within Agriculture, specialty films such as greenhouse and mulch films impose specific durability criteria; Automotive applications split into exterior and interior requirements with differing thermal and mechanical constraints; Construction uses olefin-derived products in flooring, insulation, and pipes & fittings where fire performance and longevity are prioritized; Packaging demands a clear divide between flexible and rigid formats with regulatory and sustainability obligations shaping material selection. Understanding these layered segmentations reveals which combinations of product type, technology route, grade, and end-use industry yield the most robust margins and which are most exposed to supply disruption or regulatory change.
Regional contrasts in feedstock access, policy frameworks, and demand composition shaping strategic production, investment, and logistics decisions across global olefin markets
Regional perspectives matter because production economics, feedstock endowments, policy frameworks, and demand patterns diverge significantly across global regions. In the Americas, a combination of abundant natural gas liquids in select basins and integrated refining-petrochemical complexes drive competitive advantages for ethane-based cracking and related downstream polymer chains, while logistical capability and proximity to major polymer converters influence where investment is concentrated. Stakeholders in this region are also attuned to trade policy shifts that can rapidly alter export flows and reprice imports.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogeneous picture where regulatory stringency, circularity mandates, and proximity to diversified feedstock sources create complex trade-offs. While some markets prioritize decarbonization and recycled content obligations that favor investments in lower-emission production and advanced recycling, other markets within the region emphasize feedstock security and downstream processing capability. Infrastructure constraints and cross-border customs regimes add layers of complexity to supply planning.
Asia-Pacific remains the largest end-demand engine for many olefin derivatives, underpinned by manufacturing scale in packaging, textiles, and automotive components. The region's growth has prompted significant capacity additions, investments in both steam cracking and on-purpose technologies, and an evolving policy landscape that increasingly incorporates environmental performance metrics. Taken together, these regional dynamics mean that companies must tailor commercial strategies not just at the national level but with a clear view of cross-border logistics, regulatory compliance, and customer preference trajectories.
Insightful competitive analysis revealing how asset integration, technology partnerships, and sustainability credentials shape market positioning and negotiation leverage in the olefin sector
Competitive dynamics in the olefin sector hinge on a combination of asset footprint, technology mastery, feedstock flexibility, and commercial channel breadth. Leading integrated producers maintain advantages where they combine upstream feedstock access with midstream processing and downstream conversion, allowing them to internalize margin capture and to pivot volumes in response to supply disruptions or demand shifts. Merchant producers and traders play a complementary role by providing liquidity and arbitrage opportunities across regional markets, but they are exposed to inventory and logistics cost swings when trade frictions intensify.
Technology licensors, catalysts providers, and engineering firms represent another cluster of strategic importance; their roadmaps influence which production pathways scale and how quickly new efficiency measures propagate through the industry. Strategic partnerships between licensors and producers accelerate technology transfer and shorten the commercialization timeline for novel processes, while joint ventures and offtake agreements help de-risk capital-intensive projects.
Mergers, bolt-on acquisitions, and capacity rationalization are recurring themes as companies seek scale in feedstock procurement, logistics, and downstream outlets. Competitive differentiation increasingly rests on demonstrable progress in emissions intensity reduction, adoption of circular feedstocks, and the ability to offer customers transparent lifecycle metrics. Firms that combine operational excellence with credible sustainability credentials will command stronger bargaining positions with major converters and brand owners.
Practical strategic moves and operational changes that leaders should implement now to enhance supply chain resilience, accelerate decarbonization, and protect commercial margins under evolving market pressures
Industry leaders should adopt a layered strategy that addresses immediate resilience needs while positioning for structural transformation. Tighten supply chain visibility by integrating real-time logistics and procurement data into scenario planning processes to anticipate tariff shocks, feedstock dislocations, or freight volatility. Concurrently, expand feedstock optionality through contractual arrangements and strategic inventory buffers that reduce single-source exposure and enable rapid rerouting between steam cracking and on-purpose production when feedstock economics shift.
Accelerate selective investments in process improvements and low-carbon technology pilots that deliver measurable reductions in energy intensity and emissions footprint, prioritizing retrofit opportunities with short payback horizons and scalable impact. Strengthen commercial contracts to include flexible pricing mechanisms and force majeure clauses that reflect contemporary policy risks, and develop closer partnerships with key customers to co-design product specifications that support circular material flows and recycled content integration.
Finally, upskill teams across procurement, operations, and commercial functions to interpret complex scenario outputs and to act decisively. Embedding cross-functional decision protocols and clear governance for rapid response will convert market intelligence into timely operational moves and contracting choices that preserve margin and market access.
A transparent explanation of the research approach combining secondary analysis, expert interviews, and data triangulation to underpin findings with verifiable technical and commercial evidence
This research combines structured secondary research, targeted primary interviews, and rigorous data triangulation to ensure robust findings and defensible conclusions. Secondary inputs include technical literature, regulatory texts, public filings, and trade statistics that establish historical context and verify technical parameters such as process yields, typical impurity tolerances, and common grade specifications. Primary research incorporates interviews with senior industry practitioners across production, procurement, and technology provider roles to surface real-world constraints, investment rationales, and emerging strategic behaviors.
Data triangulation involves cross-referencing production configurations, technology adoption timelines, and trade flow indicators to validate narrative conclusions. Analytical frameworks employed include scenario analysis to model policy and feedstock shocks, sensitivity testing to identify critical cost and throughput drivers, and qualitative value chain mapping to expose points of concentrated risk or opportunity. Quality control measures entail independent peer review of technical assumptions and iterative refinement with domain experts to confirm interpretive accuracy.
Transparency about methodology, data limitations, and areas of higher uncertainty is maintained throughout the analysis, enabling readers to gauge confidence levels and to align the evidence base with their own internal models or due diligence processes.
A concise synthesis of strategic imperatives and operational priorities that executives must act on to navigate disruptions and capture value in the changing olefin environment
The evolving olefin landscape presents both challenges and opportunities that require deliberate, informed action. Structural shifts in technology and feedstock sourcing are redefining production economics, while policy interventions and sustainability expectations add new dimensions to commercial decision-making. Together, these forces favor organizations that blend operational adaptability with strategic foresight, invest selectively in lower-carbon technologies, and cultivate closer commercial partnerships across the value chain.
Executives should prioritize visibility into supply chains, flexible contracting, and investments that yield both immediate resilience benefits and longer-term strategic optionality. By aligning procurement, technical, and commercial agendas and by using scenario-based planning as a regular discipline, organizations can reduce exposure to policy shocks and capture the upside from shifts in regional competitiveness and product mix. In short, staying competitive in the olefin sector will depend on the ability to translate market intelligence into coordinated operational choices and targeted capital allocation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
191 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing adoption of bio-based olefin feedstocks to reduce carbon footprint in polymer production
- 5.2. Expansion of on-purpose propylene plants driving supply-demand dynamics in global olefin markets
- 5.3. Shift towards circular economy models with increased recycling of polyethylene and polypropylene waste
- 5.4. Rising investments in ethylene cracker upgrades to enhance feedstock flexibility and energy efficiency
- 5.5. Integration of digital process control and predictive analytics to optimize olefin plant operations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Olefin Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Butadiene
- 8.1.1. Chemical Grade
- 8.1.2. Rubber Monomer Grade
- 8.2. Ethylene
- 8.2.1. Chemical Grade
- 8.2.2. Polymer Grade
- 8.3. Propylene
- 8.3.1. Chemical Grade
- 8.3.2. Polymer Grade
- 9. Olefin Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Catalytic Dehydrogenation
- 9.1.1. Butane Dehydrogenation
- 9.1.2. Propane Dehydrogenation
- 9.2. Metathesis
- 9.3. Steam Cracking
- 9.3.1. Ethane Cracking
- 9.3.2. LPG Cracking
- 9.3.3. Naphtha Cracking
- 10. Olefin Market, by Grade
- 10.1. Chemical
- 10.1.1. Industrial Grade
- 10.1.2. Technical Grade
- 10.2. Fuel
- 10.2.1. Fuel Gas
- 10.2.2. Fuel Oil
- 10.3. Polymer
- 10.3.1. High-Density
- 10.3.2. Linear Low-Density
- 10.3.3. Low-Density
- 11. Olefin Market, by End Use Industry
- 11.1. Agriculture
- 11.1.1. Greenhouse Films
- 11.1.2. Mulch Films
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.2.1. Exteriors
- 11.2.2. Interiors
- 11.3. Construction
- 11.3.1. Flooring
- 11.3.2. Insulation
- 11.3.3. Pipes & Fittings
- 11.4. Packaging
- 11.4.1. Flexible Packaging
- 11.4.2. Rigid Packaging
- 11.5. Textile
- 12. Olefin Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Olefin Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Olefin Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation
- 15.3.2. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
- 15.3.3. Dow Inc.
- 15.3.4. ExxonMobil Chemical Company
- 15.3.5. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
- 15.3.6. Royal Dutch Shell plc
- 15.3.7. INEOS Group Holdings S.A.
- 15.3.8. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC
- 15.3.9. BASF SE
- 15.3.10. Formosa Plastics Corporation
- 15.3.11. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
