Oil & Gas Pipeline Market by Material (High Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Reinforced Concrete), Fluid Type (Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Refined Products), Pipe Type, Diameter, Pressure, Coating Type, Transportation Type, End Use - Global Forecast 2025-
Description
The Oil & Gas Pipeline Market was valued at USD 82.21 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 87.85 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.84%, reaching USD 139.58 billion by 2032.
A concise orientation that frames material options, transportation typologies and regulatory pressures shaping contemporary oil and gas pipeline strategy
The oil and gas pipeline sector is experiencing a period of intensified strategic scrutiny as industry stakeholders reassess material choices, routing strategies and long-term operational resilience. Emerging regulatory priorities, evolving fluid transport patterns and increasing emphasis on lifecycle performance have combined to elevate the importance of rigorous, evidence-based insight for decision-makers. In this context, understanding the interplay between material options, transportation modalities and regional policy landscapes is essential for minimizing project risk and aligning capital allocation with system reliability objectives.
This executive summary synthesizes the most consequential developments shaping pipeline planning and execution. It draws attention to material categories such as high density polyethylene, polypropylene, reinforced concrete and a range of steel types including alloy, carbon and stainless configurations, and examines how fluid types spanning crude oil, natural gas and refined products influence specifications. The overview sets up deeper analysis of transportation typologies from gathering and flowline networks to distribution and long-haul transmission corridors, as well as the operational implications of pipe fabrication choices like seamless and welded designs and their respective welding processes. By framing these technical and commercial dimensions together, this introduction prepares readers to evaluate trade-offs across diameter classes, pressure regimes, coating solutions and end-use settings on both offshore and onshore projects.
How technological adoption, environmental priorities and evolving engineering practices are reshaping pipeline design choices and operational resilience
The pipeline landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by multiple converging forces that affect asset selection, project delivery and resilience planning. Technological advances in welding processes and nondestructive evaluation are raising construction quality standards, and innovations in polymeric materials such as high density polyethylene and polypropylene are creating viable alternatives to traditional reinforced concrete and various steel grades for certain segments of the network. Concurrently, digitalization of asset monitoring and predictive maintenance is enabling operators to extend pipeline life and optimize operating windows without sacrificing safety.
At the same time, stakeholder expectations around environmental performance and social license are prompting reconsideration of routing, coating choice and construction techniques. Coating technologies such as fusion bonded epoxy and polyethylene are being evaluated not only for corrosion protection but also for their role in reducing lifecycle environmental footprints. The evolution of transportation types-from gathering systems that require flexible materials and smaller diameters to transmission pipelines that favor large-diameter, high-pressure steel solutions-demands integrated planning across procurement, engineering and regulatory affairs. Transitioning capital and operational strategies to reflect these shifts will be critical for operators seeking to balance cost, reliability and long-term compliance.
Evaluating how recent tariff developments are reshaping procurement, supply chain resilience and material selection decisions across pipeline projects
United States tariff dynamics in 2025 are influencing global supply chains, procurement strategies and material economics across the pipeline industry in ways that extend beyond headline trade policy. Tariff measures directed at key inputs can alter the relative cost competitiveness of materials such as alloy steel, carbon steel and stainless steel, prompting procurement teams to reassess sourcing geographies and inventory strategies. In practical terms, elevated import duties encourage a shift toward greater use of domestically fabricated pipe modules where feasible, while also incentivizing substitution toward nonmetallic options like high density polyethylene and polypropylene in applications compatible with those materials.
The cumulative impact of tariff shifts also reverberates through fabrication and logistics timelines. Suppliers facing higher input costs and reconfigured trade routes may consolidate orders and lengthen lead times, producing cascading scheduling effects for pipeline projects with tight construction windows. Contractors and owners must therefore integrate tariff risk into contracting terms, supplier diversification plans and cost escalation clauses. Moreover, tariffs can prompt regionalization of supply chains, leading to strengthened local fabrication capacity in some markets and increased collaboration between pipeline operators and domestic mill and coating vendors. Ultimately, these trade policy effects are pushing industry participants to adopt more agile sourcing, to re-evaluate the balance between welded and seamless pipe procurement strategies, and to plan for diameter- and pressure-specific contingencies across both offshore and onshore programs.
Actionable segmentation insights that connect material properties, fluid characteristics and pipeline typologies to inform engineering and procurement decisions
Segmentation reveals the nuanced drivers of demand and performance across pipeline systems, and translating those segments into practical insights helps planners prioritize technical and commercial choices. Considering material categories such as high density polyethylene, polypropylene, reinforced concrete and the spectrum of steel types including alloy, carbon and stainless variants provides a foundation for matching properties to service conditions; polymers offer corrosion resistance and flexibility suited to flowlines and distribution networks, while steel remains the dominant choice for high-pressure transmission and long-diameter applications. Fluid type is equally determinative: crude oil, natural gas and refined products each impose distinct chemical, thermal and cleanliness requirements that cascade into compatibility, testing and maintenance regimes.
Transportation type-from distribution and flowline environments to gathering and long-haul transmission-anchors decisions about pipe type, diameter and pressure class. Seamless pipe retains advantages for critical, high-pressure segments, whereas welded options such as electric resistance welding, longitudinal submerged arc welding and spiral submerged arc welding can offer cost and fabrication efficiencies for large-diameter runs. Diameter bands, whether up to 16 inches, 16 to 24 inches or above 24 inches, interact with pressure classifications of low, medium and high pressure to determine wall thickness, joining methodology and coating selection. Coating choices including fusion bonded epoxy, polyethylene and reinforced concrete must be reconciled with corrosion control strategies and installation environments, while the final layer of segmentation - end use offshore versus onshore - brings operational constraints and regulatory considerations that influence procurement timelines and engineering specifications.
Regional impacts on pipeline strategies and procurement choices driven by regulatory regimes, fabrication capacity and project priorities across key global markets
Regional dynamics exert substantial influence on pipeline planning and execution, and understanding differences across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions is vital for multinational operators and local developers alike. In the Americas, mature transmission networks coexist with investment in replacement and expansion projects that emphasize reliability, regulatory compliance and integration with existing infrastructure. This context favors a mix of steel for long-haul, high-pressure applications and polymer solutions in distribution and lateral systems, with an emphasis on coating systems that meet stringent corrosion control standards.
The Europe, Middle East & Africa region presents a heterogeneous picture: regulatory stringency and environmental scrutiny are high in many European markets, driving higher standards for pipeline integrity and environmental assessments, while parts of the Middle East and Africa focus on rapid capacity expansion and logistics efficiency. In those markets, the choice between welded and seamless pipe and the selection of appropriate welding methods are often shaped by local fabrication capabilities and workforce skill sets. Across Asia-Pacific, rapid energy demand growth and diverse coastal geographies have stimulated investments in both onshore and offshore pipeline infrastructure, encouraging adoption of large-diameter, high-pressure steel pipelines alongside polymer-based solutions for distribution and flowline networks. Each region’s regulatory environment, industrial base and logistical realities must be factored into vendor selection, coating strategies and construction timelines.
How manufacturers, coating suppliers and EPC integrators are reshaping competitive advantage through quality, fabrication capability and integrated service offerings
Competitive dynamics among companies operating in the pipeline value chain reflect a mixture of vertical integration, strategic partnerships and specialization. Major pipe manufacturers, coating suppliers and engineering, procurement and construction firms are focusing on process optimization, quality assurance and after-sales service to differentiate in an environment where project schedules and material performance determine contract outcomes. Firms that invest in advanced welding capabilities, automated inspection technologies and modular fabrication techniques are positioned to reduce on-site risk and shorten delivery cycles, while those that deepen aftermarket services such as condition monitoring and integrity management secure longer-term revenue streams.
Supply-side players are also responding to customer demands for traceability and compliance, expanding capabilities to provide certified material provenance, third-party testing and documented quality control across alloy, carbon and stainless steel products. On the demand side, operators are tightening specifications for coatings, preferring solutions that balance corrosion protection with ease of application in diverse climates and seabed conditions. Increasingly, competitive advantage is earned through collaborative contracting that aligns incentives across owners, contractors and suppliers, enabling more predictable project delivery and shared accountability for lifecycle performance.
Practical, prioritized actions executives should implement to strengthen procurement resilience, enhance construction quality and optimize lifecycle performance
Industry leaders can take concrete, prioritized steps to strengthen resilience, reduce execution risk and capture long-term value across their pipeline portfolios. First, align procurement policies with multi-scenario supply chain planning that explicitly factors in tariff volatility, domestic fabrication capacity and supplier lead times; this approach supports diversified sourcing and contingency inventory without sacrificing quality requirements. Second, integrate material selection protocols that map fluid characteristics and operating pressures to the most appropriate material and pipe type, carefully considering when polymeric options such as high density polyethylene or polypropylene can substitute for metal in low- to medium-pressure segments and when steel variants remain indispensable.
Third, adopt construction and integrity practices that emphasize welding quality and non-destructive evaluation for both seamless and welded pipes, including the specific welding methodologies appropriate to project scale. Fourth, prioritize coating strategies that reflect installation environment and lifecycle maintenance plans, selecting options like fusion bonded epoxy or polyethylene where they deliver clear protective benefits. Finally, invest in digital monitoring and predictive maintenance systems to optimize operating windows and extend asset life, while pursuing collaborative contracting models that align incentives across the value chain and reduce dispute exposure during construction and commissioning.
A clear description of the analytical approach that combines technical standards review, practitioner consultations and scenario-driven validation to ensure practical relevance
The research underpinning this executive summary combines a structured review of technical standards, regulatory developments and industry best practices with qualitative inputs from domain experts and practitioners engaged in pipeline design, construction and operations. Primary research included consultations with engineering leads, supply chain managers and coating specialists to validate material-performance assumptions and to identify emerging trends in welded and seamless pipe fabrication. Secondary sources comprised public regulatory documents, technical standards and peer-reviewed literature that informed assessments of pressure classifications, welding methods and coating performance in various environmental conditions.
Triangulation of findings was achieved by cross-checking technical claims against fabrication case studies and by evaluating the practical implications of tariff scenarios through scenario analysis rather than point estimates. Care was taken to represent the interplay between fluid type, transportation typology and end-use environment so that material and coating recommendations are grounded in real-world operational constraints. Where uncertainty exists, the methodology emphasizes transparency about assumptions and outlines the risk factors that should be incorporated into procurement and engineering decision-making.
A concise synthesis highlighting the strategic choices that determine project resilience and long-term operational integrity in a changing policy and materials environment
The pipeline industry stands at an inflection point where material innovation, regulatory change and shifting trade dynamics are reshaping how assets are specified and delivered. Operators and contractors that proactively adapt procurement frameworks, strengthen fabrication quality controls and embrace appropriate material substitution will be better positioned to manage scheduling risk and lifecycle costs. Conversely, organizations that delay integrating supply chain resilience measures or that treat tariff shifts as transitory may encounter extended lead times, material shortages and higher project execution risk.
Looking ahead, the most successful programs will be those that blend technical rigor with commercial flexibility: selecting pipe types and coatings that align with fluid service and environmental constraints, diversifying supply chains across regional fabrication pockets, and adopting contracting structures that promote shared risk management. These steps will enable stakeholders to navigate the twin challenges of maintaining operational integrity while responding to rapidly evolving policy and market conditions across both offshore and onshore landscapes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise orientation that frames material options, transportation typologies and regulatory pressures shaping contemporary oil and gas pipeline strategy
The oil and gas pipeline sector is experiencing a period of intensified strategic scrutiny as industry stakeholders reassess material choices, routing strategies and long-term operational resilience. Emerging regulatory priorities, evolving fluid transport patterns and increasing emphasis on lifecycle performance have combined to elevate the importance of rigorous, evidence-based insight for decision-makers. In this context, understanding the interplay between material options, transportation modalities and regional policy landscapes is essential for minimizing project risk and aligning capital allocation with system reliability objectives.
This executive summary synthesizes the most consequential developments shaping pipeline planning and execution. It draws attention to material categories such as high density polyethylene, polypropylene, reinforced concrete and a range of steel types including alloy, carbon and stainless configurations, and examines how fluid types spanning crude oil, natural gas and refined products influence specifications. The overview sets up deeper analysis of transportation typologies from gathering and flowline networks to distribution and long-haul transmission corridors, as well as the operational implications of pipe fabrication choices like seamless and welded designs and their respective welding processes. By framing these technical and commercial dimensions together, this introduction prepares readers to evaluate trade-offs across diameter classes, pressure regimes, coating solutions and end-use settings on both offshore and onshore projects.
How technological adoption, environmental priorities and evolving engineering practices are reshaping pipeline design choices and operational resilience
The pipeline landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by multiple converging forces that affect asset selection, project delivery and resilience planning. Technological advances in welding processes and nondestructive evaluation are raising construction quality standards, and innovations in polymeric materials such as high density polyethylene and polypropylene are creating viable alternatives to traditional reinforced concrete and various steel grades for certain segments of the network. Concurrently, digitalization of asset monitoring and predictive maintenance is enabling operators to extend pipeline life and optimize operating windows without sacrificing safety.
At the same time, stakeholder expectations around environmental performance and social license are prompting reconsideration of routing, coating choice and construction techniques. Coating technologies such as fusion bonded epoxy and polyethylene are being evaluated not only for corrosion protection but also for their role in reducing lifecycle environmental footprints. The evolution of transportation types-from gathering systems that require flexible materials and smaller diameters to transmission pipelines that favor large-diameter, high-pressure steel solutions-demands integrated planning across procurement, engineering and regulatory affairs. Transitioning capital and operational strategies to reflect these shifts will be critical for operators seeking to balance cost, reliability and long-term compliance.
Evaluating how recent tariff developments are reshaping procurement, supply chain resilience and material selection decisions across pipeline projects
United States tariff dynamics in 2025 are influencing global supply chains, procurement strategies and material economics across the pipeline industry in ways that extend beyond headline trade policy. Tariff measures directed at key inputs can alter the relative cost competitiveness of materials such as alloy steel, carbon steel and stainless steel, prompting procurement teams to reassess sourcing geographies and inventory strategies. In practical terms, elevated import duties encourage a shift toward greater use of domestically fabricated pipe modules where feasible, while also incentivizing substitution toward nonmetallic options like high density polyethylene and polypropylene in applications compatible with those materials.
The cumulative impact of tariff shifts also reverberates through fabrication and logistics timelines. Suppliers facing higher input costs and reconfigured trade routes may consolidate orders and lengthen lead times, producing cascading scheduling effects for pipeline projects with tight construction windows. Contractors and owners must therefore integrate tariff risk into contracting terms, supplier diversification plans and cost escalation clauses. Moreover, tariffs can prompt regionalization of supply chains, leading to strengthened local fabrication capacity in some markets and increased collaboration between pipeline operators and domestic mill and coating vendors. Ultimately, these trade policy effects are pushing industry participants to adopt more agile sourcing, to re-evaluate the balance between welded and seamless pipe procurement strategies, and to plan for diameter- and pressure-specific contingencies across both offshore and onshore programs.
Actionable segmentation insights that connect material properties, fluid characteristics and pipeline typologies to inform engineering and procurement decisions
Segmentation reveals the nuanced drivers of demand and performance across pipeline systems, and translating those segments into practical insights helps planners prioritize technical and commercial choices. Considering material categories such as high density polyethylene, polypropylene, reinforced concrete and the spectrum of steel types including alloy, carbon and stainless variants provides a foundation for matching properties to service conditions; polymers offer corrosion resistance and flexibility suited to flowlines and distribution networks, while steel remains the dominant choice for high-pressure transmission and long-diameter applications. Fluid type is equally determinative: crude oil, natural gas and refined products each impose distinct chemical, thermal and cleanliness requirements that cascade into compatibility, testing and maintenance regimes.
Transportation type-from distribution and flowline environments to gathering and long-haul transmission-anchors decisions about pipe type, diameter and pressure class. Seamless pipe retains advantages for critical, high-pressure segments, whereas welded options such as electric resistance welding, longitudinal submerged arc welding and spiral submerged arc welding can offer cost and fabrication efficiencies for large-diameter runs. Diameter bands, whether up to 16 inches, 16 to 24 inches or above 24 inches, interact with pressure classifications of low, medium and high pressure to determine wall thickness, joining methodology and coating selection. Coating choices including fusion bonded epoxy, polyethylene and reinforced concrete must be reconciled with corrosion control strategies and installation environments, while the final layer of segmentation - end use offshore versus onshore - brings operational constraints and regulatory considerations that influence procurement timelines and engineering specifications.
Regional impacts on pipeline strategies and procurement choices driven by regulatory regimes, fabrication capacity and project priorities across key global markets
Regional dynamics exert substantial influence on pipeline planning and execution, and understanding differences across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions is vital for multinational operators and local developers alike. In the Americas, mature transmission networks coexist with investment in replacement and expansion projects that emphasize reliability, regulatory compliance and integration with existing infrastructure. This context favors a mix of steel for long-haul, high-pressure applications and polymer solutions in distribution and lateral systems, with an emphasis on coating systems that meet stringent corrosion control standards.
The Europe, Middle East & Africa region presents a heterogeneous picture: regulatory stringency and environmental scrutiny are high in many European markets, driving higher standards for pipeline integrity and environmental assessments, while parts of the Middle East and Africa focus on rapid capacity expansion and logistics efficiency. In those markets, the choice between welded and seamless pipe and the selection of appropriate welding methods are often shaped by local fabrication capabilities and workforce skill sets. Across Asia-Pacific, rapid energy demand growth and diverse coastal geographies have stimulated investments in both onshore and offshore pipeline infrastructure, encouraging adoption of large-diameter, high-pressure steel pipelines alongside polymer-based solutions for distribution and flowline networks. Each region’s regulatory environment, industrial base and logistical realities must be factored into vendor selection, coating strategies and construction timelines.
How manufacturers, coating suppliers and EPC integrators are reshaping competitive advantage through quality, fabrication capability and integrated service offerings
Competitive dynamics among companies operating in the pipeline value chain reflect a mixture of vertical integration, strategic partnerships and specialization. Major pipe manufacturers, coating suppliers and engineering, procurement and construction firms are focusing on process optimization, quality assurance and after-sales service to differentiate in an environment where project schedules and material performance determine contract outcomes. Firms that invest in advanced welding capabilities, automated inspection technologies and modular fabrication techniques are positioned to reduce on-site risk and shorten delivery cycles, while those that deepen aftermarket services such as condition monitoring and integrity management secure longer-term revenue streams.
Supply-side players are also responding to customer demands for traceability and compliance, expanding capabilities to provide certified material provenance, third-party testing and documented quality control across alloy, carbon and stainless steel products. On the demand side, operators are tightening specifications for coatings, preferring solutions that balance corrosion protection with ease of application in diverse climates and seabed conditions. Increasingly, competitive advantage is earned through collaborative contracting that aligns incentives across owners, contractors and suppliers, enabling more predictable project delivery and shared accountability for lifecycle performance.
Practical, prioritized actions executives should implement to strengthen procurement resilience, enhance construction quality and optimize lifecycle performance
Industry leaders can take concrete, prioritized steps to strengthen resilience, reduce execution risk and capture long-term value across their pipeline portfolios. First, align procurement policies with multi-scenario supply chain planning that explicitly factors in tariff volatility, domestic fabrication capacity and supplier lead times; this approach supports diversified sourcing and contingency inventory without sacrificing quality requirements. Second, integrate material selection protocols that map fluid characteristics and operating pressures to the most appropriate material and pipe type, carefully considering when polymeric options such as high density polyethylene or polypropylene can substitute for metal in low- to medium-pressure segments and when steel variants remain indispensable.
Third, adopt construction and integrity practices that emphasize welding quality and non-destructive evaluation for both seamless and welded pipes, including the specific welding methodologies appropriate to project scale. Fourth, prioritize coating strategies that reflect installation environment and lifecycle maintenance plans, selecting options like fusion bonded epoxy or polyethylene where they deliver clear protective benefits. Finally, invest in digital monitoring and predictive maintenance systems to optimize operating windows and extend asset life, while pursuing collaborative contracting models that align incentives across the value chain and reduce dispute exposure during construction and commissioning.
A clear description of the analytical approach that combines technical standards review, practitioner consultations and scenario-driven validation to ensure practical relevance
The research underpinning this executive summary combines a structured review of technical standards, regulatory developments and industry best practices with qualitative inputs from domain experts and practitioners engaged in pipeline design, construction and operations. Primary research included consultations with engineering leads, supply chain managers and coating specialists to validate material-performance assumptions and to identify emerging trends in welded and seamless pipe fabrication. Secondary sources comprised public regulatory documents, technical standards and peer-reviewed literature that informed assessments of pressure classifications, welding methods and coating performance in various environmental conditions.
Triangulation of findings was achieved by cross-checking technical claims against fabrication case studies and by evaluating the practical implications of tariff scenarios through scenario analysis rather than point estimates. Care was taken to represent the interplay between fluid type, transportation typology and end-use environment so that material and coating recommendations are grounded in real-world operational constraints. Where uncertainty exists, the methodology emphasizes transparency about assumptions and outlines the risk factors that should be incorporated into procurement and engineering decision-making.
A concise synthesis highlighting the strategic choices that determine project resilience and long-term operational integrity in a changing policy and materials environment
The pipeline industry stands at an inflection point where material innovation, regulatory change and shifting trade dynamics are reshaping how assets are specified and delivered. Operators and contractors that proactively adapt procurement frameworks, strengthen fabrication quality controls and embrace appropriate material substitution will be better positioned to manage scheduling risk and lifecycle costs. Conversely, organizations that delay integrating supply chain resilience measures or that treat tariff shifts as transitory may encounter extended lead times, material shortages and higher project execution risk.
Looking ahead, the most successful programs will be those that blend technical rigor with commercial flexibility: selecting pipe types and coatings that align with fluid service and environmental constraints, diversifying supply chains across regional fabrication pockets, and adopting contracting structures that promote shared risk management. These steps will enable stakeholders to navigate the twin challenges of maintaining operational integrity while responding to rapidly evolving policy and market conditions across both offshore and onshore landscapes.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of advanced pipeline monitoring systems using IoT sensors and AI analytics for predictive integrity management
- 5.2. Expansion of pipeline infrastructure to support hydrogen blending and new low carbon fuel transportation networks
- 5.3. Adoption of drone and unmanned aerial vehicle inspection technologies to enhance pipeline route surveillance and safety compliance
- 5.4. Deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) pipelines connecting industrial emitters to sequestration sites for emissions reduction
- 5.5. Acceleration of pipeline cybersecurity measures to protect SCADA systems against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats
- 5.6. Utilization of composite materials and high strength steels in pipeline construction to improve durability and reduce maintenance costs
- 5.7. Regulatory enforcement of methane emission detection technologies across cross border and interstate pipeline operations
- 5.8. Strategic rerouting and community engagement initiatives to address public opposition in pipeline project developments
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Material
- 8.1. High Density Polyethylene
- 8.2. Polypropylene
- 8.3. Reinforced Concrete
- 8.4. Steel
- 8.4.1. Alloy Steel
- 8.4.2. Carbon Steel
- 8.4.3. Stainless Steel
- 9. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Fluid Type
- 9.1. Crude Oil
- 9.2. Natural Gas
- 9.3. Refined Products
- 10. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Pipe Type
- 10.1. Seamless
- 10.2. Welded
- 10.2.1. Electric Resistance Welding
- 10.2.2. Longitudinal Submerged Arc Welding
- 10.2.3. Spiral Submerged Arc Welding
- 11. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Diameter
- 11.1. 16 To 24 Inches
- 11.2. Above 24 Inches
- 11.3. Less Than 16 Inches
- 12. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Pressure
- 12.1. High Pressure
- 12.2. Low Pressure
- 12.3. Medium Pressure
- 13. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Coating Type
- 13.1. Fusion Bonded Epoxy
- 13.2. Polyethylene
- 13.3. Reinforced Concrete
- 14. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Transportation Type
- 14.1. Distribution
- 14.2. Flowline
- 14.3. Gathering
- 14.4. Transmission
- 15. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by End Use
- 15.1. Offshore
- 15.2. Onshore
- 16. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Region
- 16.1. Americas
- 16.1.1. North America
- 16.1.2. Latin America
- 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 16.2.1. Europe
- 16.2.2. Middle East
- 16.2.3. Africa
- 16.3. Asia-Pacific
- 17. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Group
- 17.1. ASEAN
- 17.2. GCC
- 17.3. European Union
- 17.4. BRICS
- 17.5. G7
- 17.6. NATO
- 18. Oil & Gas Pipeline Market, by Country
- 18.1. United States
- 18.2. Canada
- 18.3. Mexico
- 18.4. Brazil
- 18.5. United Kingdom
- 18.6. Germany
- 18.7. France
- 18.8. Russia
- 18.9. Italy
- 18.10. Spain
- 18.11. China
- 18.12. India
- 18.13. Japan
- 18.14. Australia
- 18.15. South Korea
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 19.3. Competitive Analysis
- 19.3.1. ABB Ltd.
- 19.3.2. ArcelorMittal S.A.
- 19.3.3. Bureau Veritas SA
- 19.3.4. Chelpipe Group
- 19.3.5. Europipe GmbH
- 19.3.6. EVRAZ plc
- 19.3.7. General Electric Company
- 19.3.8. Jindal SAW Ltd.
- 19.3.9. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 19.3.10. Nippon Steel Corporation
- 19.3.11. OAO TMK
- 19.3.12. PAO TMK
- 19.3.13. Salzgitter AG
- 19.3.14. SB International, Inc.
- 19.3.15. Siemens Energy AG
- 19.3.16. Tenaris SA
- 19.3.17. TMK IPSCO
- 19.3.18. United Metallurgical Company
- 19.3.19. Vallourec S.A.
- 19.3.20. Welspun Corp Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
