Nuclear Spent Fuel Market by Service Type (Conditioning, Disposal, Reprocessing), Fuel Type (Metal Fuel, Mixed Oxide, Uranium Oxide), Packaging Type, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Nuclear Spent Fuel Market was valued at USD 3.94 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.43 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.54%, reaching USD 10.15 billion by 2032.
Framing the complex operational, regulatory, and technological challenges that define contemporary spent fuel management and strategic planning priorities
The management of irradiated nuclear fuel is an increasingly complex technical and policy challenge that touches supply chains, regulatory frameworks, long-term stewardship, and national security imperatives. Stakeholders must reconcile operational safety with environmental responsibility while ensuring continuity of energy and defense programs. This introduction situates the reader within that intersection, highlighting why integrated lifecycle approaches and cross-sector coordination are essential for resilient spent fuel strategies.
Contemporary drivers include ongoing reactor operations, decommissioning schedules, advances in fuel chemistry, and evolving international frameworks for radioactive waste. At the same time, technological innovation in conditioning, storage systems, transportation casks, and disposal concepts is reshaping the toolkit available to program managers. These shifts demand new governance approaches that bridge technical, legal, and community engagement dimensions.
Consequently, leaders are prioritizing adaptive plans that incorporate modular technical solutions, robust regulatory compliance pathways, and transparent stakeholder communications. The imperative is to manage near-term operational needs without compromising long-term stewardship objectives. This document frames those priorities, preparing readers to assess strategic trade-offs and operational constraints across the spent fuel lifecycle while preserving options for future technological and policy developments.
How coordinated technological advancement, policy recalibration, and supply chain transformation are reshaping lifecycle approaches to spent fuel management
The landscape for spent fuel management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advancement, policy recalibration, and supply chain reconfiguration. Emerging conditioning technologies and modular storage solutions are increasing flexibility in how irradiated fuel is handled, while iterative improvements in transportation systems are enhancing safety margins and logistical efficiency. These technical changes are occurring in parallel with strengthened regulatory scrutiny and heightened societal expectations for transparency and environmental stewardship.
Policy changes are prompting governments to revisit long-term disposal strategies, evaluate centralized versus decentralized storage models, and explore partnerships for regional facilities. At the same time, nuclear operators and service providers are integrating digital tools for asset management, remote monitoring, and predictive maintenance. These digital capabilities are enabling more accurate lifecycle planning and risk-based decision making, while also introducing new considerations for cybersecurity and data governance.
Together, these forces are encouraging a shift from siloed transactional activities to holistic lifecycle management. Organizations that proactively align technical capability development with regulatory engagement and community outreach will gain a strategic advantage. In short, the market is moving toward integrated solutions that combine engineering robustness, regulatory compatibility, and stakeholder trust.
Assessing the ripple effects of 2025 tariff interventions on supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and domestic capability development in spent fuel programs
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 introduced discrete supply chain pressures that reverberated through the procurement, maintenance, and capital planning activities associated with spent fuel management. Many critical components for conditioning equipment, heavy-duty transport casks, and engineered storage systems originate from international suppliers. Tariff-driven cost increases have therefore prompted procurement teams to reassess sourcing strategies, prioritize domestic content where feasible, and accelerate qualification of alternate suppliers.
In response, some operators extended maintenance cycles and deferred noncritical upgrades to preserve near-term budgets, while others renegotiated long-term supplier contracts to lock in pricing and protect schedule certainty. Meanwhile, service providers adapted by localizing certain manufacturing steps, investing in regional fabrication capacity, and streamlining certification processes to reduce exposure to cross-border cost volatility. These tactical adjustments helped buffer operational continuity but also underscored vulnerabilities in globalized supply chains.
The tariffs also influenced technology adoption trajectories. Where imported specialized components became less economically attractive, operators showed increased interest in modular, standardized solutions that can be fabricated with higher domestic content. Regulatory authorities and procurement bodies have been encouraged to update qualification pathways to support qualified domestic suppliers without compromising technical rigor. Altogether, the 2025 tariff environment catalyzed a rebalancing of supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and investment prioritization across the spent fuel community.
Unpacking granular segmentation across services, fuel chemistries, packaging formats, and end-user requirements to align technical solutions with program objectives
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated needs and technical pathways across service, fuel, packaging, and end-user dimensions, each carrying distinct operational and regulatory implications. When examining services, conditioning activities span compaction and encapsulation while disposal pathways include geological disposal and near surface disposal; reprocessing routes cover chemical processing and mechanical processing, storage options are categorized into dry storage and wet storage, and transportation is executed via rail transport, road transport, and sea transport. These service subtypes impose varying technical specifications for handling, shielding, and long-term integrity, which in turn shape infrastructure investment and workforce skill requirements.
Fuel chemistry further stratifies program choices. Metal fuel, mixed oxide, and uranium oxide each present unique radiological, thermal, and metallurgical behaviors that inform conditioning approaches and material compatibility assessments. Packaging choices-whether employing canister, cask, or container formats-interact with both service modalities and fuel types to determine heat dissipation, criticality control, and regulatory compliance over operational lifetimes. The selection of packaging must therefore align with conditioning outputs and anticipated storage or disposal endpoints.
End-user profiles drive program objectives and performance metrics. Defense agencies prioritize secure, traceable handling and long-term stewardship while nuclear power plants focus on operational continuity, regulatory compliance, and decommissioning timelines; research institutes emphasize flexibility for experimental fuels and controlled returns. Understanding the interplay among service type, fuel chemistry, packaging design, and end-user priorities allows planners to craft differentiated strategies that optimize safety, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory alignment across the entire spent fuel lifecycle.
How divergent regional regulatory priorities, industrial capabilities, and public expectations drive distinct strategic approaches to spent fuel lifecycle management
Regional dynamics create distinct strategic and operational landscapes for spent fuel management, with each geography reflecting different regulatory frameworks, industrial capability, and public sentiment. In the Americas, a combination of long-established regulatory institutions and significant legacy inventories has prioritized on-site interim storage and incremental investment in domestic fabrication and transportation systems. Actors in this region often emphasize regulatory certainty, community engagement for siting decisions, and investments that strengthen domestic manufacturing of key components.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous: several European states maintain advanced regulatory regimes focused on geological disposal and regional cooperation, while other jurisdictions within the broader region are at earlier stages of policy formation and infrastructural development. This diversity drives demand for adaptable solutions that can be scaled to differing institutional capacities, and it encourages multinational collaboration on research, licensing harmonization, and shared disposal concepts. Public consultation and cross-border regulatory dialogue are common themes across the region.
Asia-Pacific presents a dynamic mix of established reactor fleets, expanding nuclear programs, and significant investments in new fuel and storage technologies. Governments and operators in this region are actively exploring centralized interim storage options, domestic capability enhancement, and partnerships that enable technology transfer. Across all regions, the interplay of national priorities, regulatory maturity, and industrial capacity shapes where investments occur and which technical pathways are pursued, underscoring the need for regionally informed strategies that respect local governance and societal expectations.
Critical competitive patterns and capability investments shaping supplier ecosystems, partnerships, and differentiated value propositions across the spent fuel services landscape
Industry participants span a spectrum from specialized engineering firms and heavy fabrication shops to integrated service providers and collaborative research consortia. Leading companies are strengthening their offerings through targeted investments in modular conditioning technologies, advanced materials for long-lived packaging, digital monitoring systems, and logistics platforms that improve traceability and safety. Strategic partnerships between operators and fabricators are becoming more common as they reduce schedule risk and enable technical knowledge transfer.
Competitive differentiation increasingly rests on demonstrable compliance histories, the ability to support customized licensing packages, and the provision of end-to-end services that reduce client coordination burdens. Several organizations are building capabilities to provide integrated solutions that encompass conditioning, secure storage, transportation, and regulatory support. Innovation pipelines are focused on reducing lifecycle burdens through enhanced corrosion resistance, improved thermal management within packaging systems, and remote monitoring that lowers occupational exposure and maintenance costs.
At the same time, smaller specialized firms contribute niche capabilities-advanced encapsulation techniques, remote handling robotics, and specialized transport engineering-that feed into broader program architectures. Observing technology partnerships, joint ventures, and consolidations provides insight into where expertise is coalescing and where capacity is being scaled to meet evolving programmatic demands. The result is an ecosystem moving toward collaborative, interoperable solutions that align technical robustness with regulatory and operational needs.
Implementable actions for program leaders to enhance supply chain resilience, regulatory readiness, and stakeholder trust across spent fuel lifecycle programs
Leaders should prioritize a set of practical measures designed to strengthen operational resilience, regulatory alignment, and stakeholder confidence. First, invest in modular and standardized engineering solutions that can be qualified across multiple regulatory regimes to reduce procurement complexity and accelerate deployment timelines. Standardization enables greater supply chain predictability and supports in-country fabrication strategies that mitigate import exposure.
Second, deepen regulatory engagement early in program design to streamline licensing pathways and incorporate compliance considerations into technical specifications. Proactive dialogue with regulators and independent technical bodies reduces approval risk and helps align safety cases with evolving requirements. Third, expand digital monitoring and data integrity systems to support predictive maintenance, remote verification, and enhanced records for long-term stewardship. These systems also create audit trails that facilitate oversight and stakeholder communication.
Fourth, develop collaborative supplier networks that combine large-scale fabrication capacity with specialized niche providers to ensure both volume capability and technical depth. Fifth, integrate robust community and stakeholder engagement strategies into site selection and project planning to build trust and social license for long-term facilities. Collectively, these actions will enable organizations to manage near-term operational demands while preserving flexibility for future technical and policy developments.
A rigorous, evidence-based research approach blending primary expert engagement, documentation review, scenario mapping, and cross-validation to ensure actionable program insight
The research underpinning this analysis combined a structured review of technical literature, regulatory filings, and publicly available design specifications with interviews of subject-matter experts across operations, engineering, and policy domains. Primary engagements included conversations with licensed operators, packaging designers, and transport specialists to validate technical assumptions and operational constraints. These qualitative inputs were synthesized with secondary-source analysis to build a coherent view of technology trajectories and governance trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation of vendor technical claims against independent certification reports and regulatory documentation. Scenario mapping was employed to test the resilience of procurement and technology strategies under varying policy and supply chain conditions. Where applicable, case studies of implemented conditioning, storage, transport, and disposal projects were examined to extract lessons learned on permitting timelines, community engagement practices, and lifecycle maintenance requirements.
Throughout the methodology, emphasis was placed on traceability of sources, transparent articulation of assumptions, and explicit identification of uncertainties. The approach prioritized actionable insight over speculative projection and sought to deliver a practical evidence base to support strategic decision making while remaining sensitive to evolving technical and regulatory developments.
Synthesizing technical, regulatory, and stakeholder imperatives into a pragmatic roadmap for resilient and sustainable spent fuel management
Effective spent fuel management requires aligning technical solutions with regulatory expectations, stakeholder priorities, and long-term stewardship obligations. Integrative planning that connects conditioning, storage, transportation, and disposal considerations yields more robust outcomes than isolated decision making. Across the lifecycle, the emphasis should be on technologies and procurement approaches that enhance safety, reduce operational complexity, and provide flexibility to adapt to future policy or technological shifts.
Operational resilience depends on diversified supplier networks, strengthened domestic fabrication where strategic, and investment in digital systems that improve monitoring and maintenance. Regulatory engagement remains pivotal; early, iterative interaction with authorities improves the prospects of timely approvals and reduces downstream redesign risk. Equally, building social license through transparent community engagement is essential for siting decisions and long-term facility stewardship.
In closing, the path forward is one of pragmatic innovation: combining proven engineering practices with targeted advancements in materials, monitoring, and logistics. Organizations that integrate technical excellence with careful regulatory navigation and meaningful stakeholder outreach will be best positioned to manage both immediate operational requirements and enduring stewardship responsibilities.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the complex operational, regulatory, and technological challenges that define contemporary spent fuel management and strategic planning priorities
The management of irradiated nuclear fuel is an increasingly complex technical and policy challenge that touches supply chains, regulatory frameworks, long-term stewardship, and national security imperatives. Stakeholders must reconcile operational safety with environmental responsibility while ensuring continuity of energy and defense programs. This introduction situates the reader within that intersection, highlighting why integrated lifecycle approaches and cross-sector coordination are essential for resilient spent fuel strategies.
Contemporary drivers include ongoing reactor operations, decommissioning schedules, advances in fuel chemistry, and evolving international frameworks for radioactive waste. At the same time, technological innovation in conditioning, storage systems, transportation casks, and disposal concepts is reshaping the toolkit available to program managers. These shifts demand new governance approaches that bridge technical, legal, and community engagement dimensions.
Consequently, leaders are prioritizing adaptive plans that incorporate modular technical solutions, robust regulatory compliance pathways, and transparent stakeholder communications. The imperative is to manage near-term operational needs without compromising long-term stewardship objectives. This document frames those priorities, preparing readers to assess strategic trade-offs and operational constraints across the spent fuel lifecycle while preserving options for future technological and policy developments.
How coordinated technological advancement, policy recalibration, and supply chain transformation are reshaping lifecycle approaches to spent fuel management
The landscape for spent fuel management is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological advancement, policy recalibration, and supply chain reconfiguration. Emerging conditioning technologies and modular storage solutions are increasing flexibility in how irradiated fuel is handled, while iterative improvements in transportation systems are enhancing safety margins and logistical efficiency. These technical changes are occurring in parallel with strengthened regulatory scrutiny and heightened societal expectations for transparency and environmental stewardship.
Policy changes are prompting governments to revisit long-term disposal strategies, evaluate centralized versus decentralized storage models, and explore partnerships for regional facilities. At the same time, nuclear operators and service providers are integrating digital tools for asset management, remote monitoring, and predictive maintenance. These digital capabilities are enabling more accurate lifecycle planning and risk-based decision making, while also introducing new considerations for cybersecurity and data governance.
Together, these forces are encouraging a shift from siloed transactional activities to holistic lifecycle management. Organizations that proactively align technical capability development with regulatory engagement and community outreach will gain a strategic advantage. In short, the market is moving toward integrated solutions that combine engineering robustness, regulatory compatibility, and stakeholder trust.
Assessing the ripple effects of 2025 tariff interventions on supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and domestic capability development in spent fuel programs
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 introduced discrete supply chain pressures that reverberated through the procurement, maintenance, and capital planning activities associated with spent fuel management. Many critical components for conditioning equipment, heavy-duty transport casks, and engineered storage systems originate from international suppliers. Tariff-driven cost increases have therefore prompted procurement teams to reassess sourcing strategies, prioritize domestic content where feasible, and accelerate qualification of alternate suppliers.
In response, some operators extended maintenance cycles and deferred noncritical upgrades to preserve near-term budgets, while others renegotiated long-term supplier contracts to lock in pricing and protect schedule certainty. Meanwhile, service providers adapted by localizing certain manufacturing steps, investing in regional fabrication capacity, and streamlining certification processes to reduce exposure to cross-border cost volatility. These tactical adjustments helped buffer operational continuity but also underscored vulnerabilities in globalized supply chains.
The tariffs also influenced technology adoption trajectories. Where imported specialized components became less economically attractive, operators showed increased interest in modular, standardized solutions that can be fabricated with higher domestic content. Regulatory authorities and procurement bodies have been encouraged to update qualification pathways to support qualified domestic suppliers without compromising technical rigor. Altogether, the 2025 tariff environment catalyzed a rebalancing of supply chain resilience, procurement strategies, and investment prioritization across the spent fuel community.
Unpacking granular segmentation across services, fuel chemistries, packaging formats, and end-user requirements to align technical solutions with program objectives
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated needs and technical pathways across service, fuel, packaging, and end-user dimensions, each carrying distinct operational and regulatory implications. When examining services, conditioning activities span compaction and encapsulation while disposal pathways include geological disposal and near surface disposal; reprocessing routes cover chemical processing and mechanical processing, storage options are categorized into dry storage and wet storage, and transportation is executed via rail transport, road transport, and sea transport. These service subtypes impose varying technical specifications for handling, shielding, and long-term integrity, which in turn shape infrastructure investment and workforce skill requirements.
Fuel chemistry further stratifies program choices. Metal fuel, mixed oxide, and uranium oxide each present unique radiological, thermal, and metallurgical behaviors that inform conditioning approaches and material compatibility assessments. Packaging choices-whether employing canister, cask, or container formats-interact with both service modalities and fuel types to determine heat dissipation, criticality control, and regulatory compliance over operational lifetimes. The selection of packaging must therefore align with conditioning outputs and anticipated storage or disposal endpoints.
End-user profiles drive program objectives and performance metrics. Defense agencies prioritize secure, traceable handling and long-term stewardship while nuclear power plants focus on operational continuity, regulatory compliance, and decommissioning timelines; research institutes emphasize flexibility for experimental fuels and controlled returns. Understanding the interplay among service type, fuel chemistry, packaging design, and end-user priorities allows planners to craft differentiated strategies that optimize safety, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory alignment across the entire spent fuel lifecycle.
How divergent regional regulatory priorities, industrial capabilities, and public expectations drive distinct strategic approaches to spent fuel lifecycle management
Regional dynamics create distinct strategic and operational landscapes for spent fuel management, with each geography reflecting different regulatory frameworks, industrial capability, and public sentiment. In the Americas, a combination of long-established regulatory institutions and significant legacy inventories has prioritized on-site interim storage and incremental investment in domestic fabrication and transportation systems. Actors in this region often emphasize regulatory certainty, community engagement for siting decisions, and investments that strengthen domestic manufacturing of key components.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous: several European states maintain advanced regulatory regimes focused on geological disposal and regional cooperation, while other jurisdictions within the broader region are at earlier stages of policy formation and infrastructural development. This diversity drives demand for adaptable solutions that can be scaled to differing institutional capacities, and it encourages multinational collaboration on research, licensing harmonization, and shared disposal concepts. Public consultation and cross-border regulatory dialogue are common themes across the region.
Asia-Pacific presents a dynamic mix of established reactor fleets, expanding nuclear programs, and significant investments in new fuel and storage technologies. Governments and operators in this region are actively exploring centralized interim storage options, domestic capability enhancement, and partnerships that enable technology transfer. Across all regions, the interplay of national priorities, regulatory maturity, and industrial capacity shapes where investments occur and which technical pathways are pursued, underscoring the need for regionally informed strategies that respect local governance and societal expectations.
Critical competitive patterns and capability investments shaping supplier ecosystems, partnerships, and differentiated value propositions across the spent fuel services landscape
Industry participants span a spectrum from specialized engineering firms and heavy fabrication shops to integrated service providers and collaborative research consortia. Leading companies are strengthening their offerings through targeted investments in modular conditioning technologies, advanced materials for long-lived packaging, digital monitoring systems, and logistics platforms that improve traceability and safety. Strategic partnerships between operators and fabricators are becoming more common as they reduce schedule risk and enable technical knowledge transfer.
Competitive differentiation increasingly rests on demonstrable compliance histories, the ability to support customized licensing packages, and the provision of end-to-end services that reduce client coordination burdens. Several organizations are building capabilities to provide integrated solutions that encompass conditioning, secure storage, transportation, and regulatory support. Innovation pipelines are focused on reducing lifecycle burdens through enhanced corrosion resistance, improved thermal management within packaging systems, and remote monitoring that lowers occupational exposure and maintenance costs.
At the same time, smaller specialized firms contribute niche capabilities-advanced encapsulation techniques, remote handling robotics, and specialized transport engineering-that feed into broader program architectures. Observing technology partnerships, joint ventures, and consolidations provides insight into where expertise is coalescing and where capacity is being scaled to meet evolving programmatic demands. The result is an ecosystem moving toward collaborative, interoperable solutions that align technical robustness with regulatory and operational needs.
Implementable actions for program leaders to enhance supply chain resilience, regulatory readiness, and stakeholder trust across spent fuel lifecycle programs
Leaders should prioritize a set of practical measures designed to strengthen operational resilience, regulatory alignment, and stakeholder confidence. First, invest in modular and standardized engineering solutions that can be qualified across multiple regulatory regimes to reduce procurement complexity and accelerate deployment timelines. Standardization enables greater supply chain predictability and supports in-country fabrication strategies that mitigate import exposure.
Second, deepen regulatory engagement early in program design to streamline licensing pathways and incorporate compliance considerations into technical specifications. Proactive dialogue with regulators and independent technical bodies reduces approval risk and helps align safety cases with evolving requirements. Third, expand digital monitoring and data integrity systems to support predictive maintenance, remote verification, and enhanced records for long-term stewardship. These systems also create audit trails that facilitate oversight and stakeholder communication.
Fourth, develop collaborative supplier networks that combine large-scale fabrication capacity with specialized niche providers to ensure both volume capability and technical depth. Fifth, integrate robust community and stakeholder engagement strategies into site selection and project planning to build trust and social license for long-term facilities. Collectively, these actions will enable organizations to manage near-term operational demands while preserving flexibility for future technical and policy developments.
A rigorous, evidence-based research approach blending primary expert engagement, documentation review, scenario mapping, and cross-validation to ensure actionable program insight
The research underpinning this analysis combined a structured review of technical literature, regulatory filings, and publicly available design specifications with interviews of subject-matter experts across operations, engineering, and policy domains. Primary engagements included conversations with licensed operators, packaging designers, and transport specialists to validate technical assumptions and operational constraints. These qualitative inputs were synthesized with secondary-source analysis to build a coherent view of technology trajectories and governance trends.
Analytical rigor was maintained through cross-validation of vendor technical claims against independent certification reports and regulatory documentation. Scenario mapping was employed to test the resilience of procurement and technology strategies under varying policy and supply chain conditions. Where applicable, case studies of implemented conditioning, storage, transport, and disposal projects were examined to extract lessons learned on permitting timelines, community engagement practices, and lifecycle maintenance requirements.
Throughout the methodology, emphasis was placed on traceability of sources, transparent articulation of assumptions, and explicit identification of uncertainties. The approach prioritized actionable insight over speculative projection and sought to deliver a practical evidence base to support strategic decision making while remaining sensitive to evolving technical and regulatory developments.
Synthesizing technical, regulatory, and stakeholder imperatives into a pragmatic roadmap for resilient and sustainable spent fuel management
Effective spent fuel management requires aligning technical solutions with regulatory expectations, stakeholder priorities, and long-term stewardship obligations. Integrative planning that connects conditioning, storage, transportation, and disposal considerations yields more robust outcomes than isolated decision making. Across the lifecycle, the emphasis should be on technologies and procurement approaches that enhance safety, reduce operational complexity, and provide flexibility to adapt to future policy or technological shifts.
Operational resilience depends on diversified supplier networks, strengthened domestic fabrication where strategic, and investment in digital systems that improve monitoring and maintenance. Regulatory engagement remains pivotal; early, iterative interaction with authorities improves the prospects of timely approvals and reduces downstream redesign risk. Equally, building social license through transparent community engagement is essential for siting decisions and long-term facility stewardship.
In closing, the path forward is one of pragmatic innovation: combining proven engineering practices with targeted advancements in materials, monitoring, and logistics. Organizations that integrate technical excellence with careful regulatory navigation and meaningful stakeholder outreach will be best positioned to manage both immediate operational requirements and enduring stewardship responsibilities.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Expansion of dry cask storage facilities to accommodate growing volumes of spent nuclear fuel
- 5.2. Deployment of advanced pyroprocessing and hydrometallurgical techniques for spent fuel reprocessing
- 5.3. Regulatory harmonization efforts enabling cross-border transportation of nuclear waste materials
- 5.4. Development of deep geological repositories and community engagement strategies for disposal
- 5.5. Integration of digital tracking and blockchain solutions for enhanced spent fuel inventory management
- 5.6. Public-private partnerships accelerating commercialization of closed fuel cycle technologies
- 5.7. Emergence of small modular reactor spent fuel management frameworks in emerging economies
- 5.8. Innovations in high-density storage canister design to optimize interim spent fuel storage capacity
- 5.9. License renewal extensions and regulatory frameworks shaping long-term spent fuel storage strategies
- 5.10. Advancements in partitioning and transmutation research to reduce volume and toxicity of nuclear waste
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Conditioning
- 8.1.1. Compaction
- 8.1.2. Encapsulation
- 8.2. Disposal
- 8.2.1. Geological Disposal
- 8.2.2. Near Surface Disposal
- 8.3. Reprocessing
- 8.3.1. Chemical Processing
- 8.3.2. Mechanical Processing
- 8.4. Storage
- 8.4.1. Dry Storage
- 8.4.2. Wet Storage
- 8.5. Transportation
- 8.5.1. Rail Transport
- 8.5.2. Road Transport
- 8.5.3. Sea Transport
- 9. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Fuel Type
- 9.1. Metal Fuel
- 9.2. Mixed Oxide
- 9.3. Uranium Oxide
- 10. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Packaging Type
- 10.1. Canister
- 10.2. Cask
- 10.3. Container
- 11. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by End User
- 11.1. Defense Agencies
- 11.2. Nuclear Power Plants
- 11.3. Research Institutes
- 12. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Nuclear Spent Fuel Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Orano SA
- 15.3.2. Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corporation
- 15.3.3. Framatome SA
- 15.3.4. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC
- 15.3.5. Holtec International Inc.
- 15.3.6. EnergySolutions, Inc.
- 15.3.7. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
- 15.3.8. BWX Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.9. China National Nuclear Corporation
- 15.3.10. Babcock International Group PLC
- 15.3.11. Veolia Environnement S.A.
- 15.3.12. Bechtel Corporation
- 15.3.13. Fluor Corporation
- 15.3.14. Amentum Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.15. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
- 15.3.16. AECOM
- 15.3.17. Hitachi Zosen Corporation
- 15.3.18. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 15.3.19. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.20. Studsvik AB
- 15.3.21. GNS Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH
- 15.3.22. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
- 15.3.23. Waste Control Specialists LLC
- 15.3.24. US Ecology, Inc.
- 15.3.25. Enercon Services, Inc.
- 15.3.26. NAC International Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
