Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market by Product Type (Dairy Products, Juice And Beverages, Meat And Seafood Products), Technology (Cold Plasma, High Pressure Processing, Ozone Treatment), Equipment, Packaging, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast
Description
The Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market was valued at USD 2.73 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 3.32 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 23.95%, reaching USD 15.22 billion by 2032.
How non-thermal pasteurization is reshaping food safety, sensory quality and sustainability across production lines and product development pipelines
Non-thermal pasteurization is redefining the intersection of food safety, product quality and sustainability by offering alternatives to conventional heat-based processing that preserve sensory attributes and nutritional value while mitigating thermal degradation. Across multiple food categories, manufacturers increasingly consider technologies that inactivate pathogens and spoilage organisms without the collateral impacts associated with thermal pasteurization. This shift reflects converging pressures from consumer demand for fresher-tasting, minimally processed foods, heightened regulatory scrutiny around foodborne illness, and corporate commitments to reduce energy consumption and product waste.
In parallel, technology maturation and factory-level integration are lowering the barriers to pilot and commercial deployment. Technology providers have refined equipment footprints, improved throughput consistency and deepened validation data sets, which in turn reduces technical uncertainty for operations teams. Consequently, decision makers in product development, quality assurance and capital planning must reassess process design, packaging compatibility and shelf-life validation protocols. Understanding the technical trade-offs among alternative non-thermal approaches, the site-level operational changes required for implementation, and the regulatory pathways for process validation is now essential to converting exploratory pilots into reliable, scalable production.
Technology improvements, commercial integration and evolving consumer expectations are accelerating mainstream adoption of non-thermal pasteurization across supply chains
The landscape for non-thermal pasteurization has experienced transformative shifts driven by technological advances, strategic partnerships and evolving customer expectations. Innovations in process control, sensor integration, and combined-hurdle treatments have expanded the feasible application envelope for non-thermal methods, enabling processors to treat more complex product matrices while maintaining throughput targets. As a result, manufacturers now consider non-thermal options not merely as niche innovations but as strategic levers for product differentiation and cost containment.
Concurrently, commercial ecosystems have adapted: original equipment manufacturers and technology licensors have expanded testing services and demonstration centers to shorten the validation cycle, and contract manufacturers are offering co-packing services that accommodate new process modalities. On the demand side, retail and food service channels are responding to consumers’ preference for fresher, nutrient-dense products by prioritizing supplier innovations that meet label and sensory expectations. Taken together, these shifts lower adoption friction and create a stronger business case for integrating non-thermal processes into mainstream supply chains, while also elevating the importance of robust validation and traceability frameworks to satisfy regulatory and retailer requirements.
Assessing the operational and procurement consequences of 2025 tariffs on global supply chains for non-thermal pasteurization equipment and critical components
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity for companies sourcing non-thermal processing equipment and specialized components from international suppliers. Many critical capital items, spare parts and consumables for advanced non-thermal systems are manufactured in a limited number of global hubs. Tariff-induced cost increases and longer customs cycles have compelled procurement teams to re-evaluate sourcing strategies, build redundancy into supplier networks and accelerate local supplier qualification where feasible.
Moreover, tariffs have affected investment decisions by altering the total cost of ownership for imported systems versus domestically produced alternatives. In response, some manufacturers have deferred capital projects or staged rollouts to minimize exposure to immediate tariff impacts, while others have renegotiated supplier terms, shifted toward modular or retrofit solutions shipped as kits, or pursued joint ventures to localize production. Regulatory harmonization efforts and trade discussions are gradually reducing some frictions, but the near-term environment requires closer coordination between sourcing, finance and operations to manage cash flow, inventory buffers and project timelines. Ultimately, firms that proactively model supply chain scenarios, diversify vendor exposure and incorporate tariff sensitivity into procurement evaluation will be best positioned to maintain deployment momentum despite trade-related headwinds.
Segment-driven insights reveal where product characteristics, technology modalities and packaging formats converge to determine non-thermal pasteurization suitability
A nuanced segmentation analysis clarifies where non-thermal pasteurization delivers the strongest operational and commercial benefits and where integration challenges persist. When examining product types, dairy products, juice and beverages, meat and seafood products, and processed fruits and vegetables each present distinct microbiological targets, thermal sensitivities and packaging considerations that influence technology selection and validation approaches. For example, high-acid beverages often allow for different process windows than low-acid dairy or protein-rich matrices, and that distinction drives both equipment choice and shelf-life strategy.
Evaluating technologies reveals that cold plasma, high pressure processing, ozone treatment, pulsed electric field, ultrasound, and ultraviolet solutions offer complementary performance characteristics. Some technologies excel at surface decontamination while others achieve volumetric inactivation, and combined-hurdle designs frequently enhance overall efficacy. Considering equipment form factors, both batch and continuous configurations warrant assessment: batch platforms often suit high-value or low-volume applications and facilitate flexible recipe development, whereas continuous systems deliver higher throughput for scaled production lines.
End users vary across food service providers, manufacturing plants, and retail outlets, each imposing different throughput, traceability and packaging requirements. Packaging choices - bottles, cans, cartons and pouches - interact with process compatibility and material permeability to shape shelf-life outcomes. Finally, distribution channels such as direct sales, distributors, and online channels affect inventory dynamics and the acceptable shelf-life margins, which in turn shape processing and packaging decisions. Integrating these segmentation lenses helps stakeholders prioritize pilots, design validation plans and align technology selection with commercial constraints and consumer expectations.
How regional regulatory frameworks, supply chain maturity and consumer preferences across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific drive adoption pathways
Regional dynamics shape both adoption velocity and the commercial pathways for non-thermal pasteurization, with distinct regulatory, supply chain and consumer preference drivers across major geographies. In the Americas, regulatory frameworks and a mature food innovation ecosystem support early adopters, especially among high-value beverage and ready-to-eat producers; logistics infrastructure and large-scale contract manufacturers facilitate pilot-to-commercial scale transitions. The presence of centralized testing facilities and a robust processing equipment manufacturing base further accelerates commercialization in targeted subsegments.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, a combination of stringent food safety standards, rising consumer demand for clean-label products and strong sustainability commitments from retailers drives interest in low-energy processing modalities. Fragmented retail systems and varying national regulatory interpretations require tailored validation strategies and close engagement with local authorities. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding cold-chain capabilities and a large base of small- and medium-sized processors create a fertile environment for scalable non-thermal solutions that reduce spoilage and enable premiumization. Cross-regionally, knowledge transfer, multinational CPG player pilots and localized equipment partnerships remain central mechanisms for scaling adoption, while region-specific incentives and subsidy programs can materially influence deployment economics.
Ecosystem dynamics among equipment makers, technology innovators, contract processors and adopters accelerate validation and commercial scaling of non-thermal processes
Market incumbents, technology specialists and emerging start-ups each play critical roles in advancing non-thermal pasteurization technologies from laboratory validation to full production integration. Leading equipment manufacturers focus on reliability, maintainability and integration support, investing in service networks and validation protocols that reduce operational risk for adopters. Technology specialists and academic consortia continue to refine process parameters and demonstrate efficacy across a broader set of product matrices, creating the empirical foundation needed for regulatory acceptance and retailer approvals.
At the same time, food manufacturers and co-packers that adopt early often act as important reference customers, documenting real-world performance and surfacing integration challenges related to throughput, cleaning regimes and packaging compatibility. Emerging entrants contribute disruptive approaches and software-enabled controls that improve process repeatability, while service providers expand capital models by offering equipment-as-a-service or contract processing to lower the barrier to entry. Strategic partnerships among these actors, including licensing agreements, joint pilots and shared demonstration facilities, accelerate learning curves and reduce time-to-validation, enabling broader commercial uptake.
Practical, phased strategies for procurement, validation and organizational alignment that minimize risk and accelerate commercial deployment of non-thermal systems
Industry leaders should adopt a phased, risk-managed approach to capture the benefits of non-thermal pasteurization while minimizing operational disruption. Begin by prioritizing high-impact pilot projects that align product portfolios with technology strengths, focusing first on products where nutrient retention, sensory quality and premium pricing compensate for integration costs. Simultaneously, invest in cross-functional teams that bring together quality, operations, procurement and regulatory affairs so validation plans address the full spectrum of technical and commercial requirements.
Procurement strategies must incorporate scenario planning for tariffs and supply chain disruptions, cultivating multiple qualified suppliers and evaluating modular retrofits that reduce lead time and capital intensity. To de-risk adoption, consider partnerships with contract manufacturers or pilot facilities to validate scaled runs before committing to line-level capital. Complement operational actions with clear consumer and trade messaging that explains product benefits and preserves brand equity during the transition. Lastly, integrate data-driven validation and digitized traceability into process design to expedite regulatory sign-off and to provide transparent evidence for retail and foodservice customers.
A transparent, reproducible research methodology combining primary interviews, technical validation and regulatory synthesis to inform deployment strategies
This research synthesizes primary interviews, technical validation reports and published regulatory guidance to construct a robust analytical framework for non-thermal pasteurization deployment. Primary interviews included process engineers, quality leaders, technology providers and contract manufacturers to capture real-world operational constraints and decision criteria. Secondary sources encompassed peer-reviewed literature on microbial inactivation kinetics, equipment technical specifications, and regulatory agency guidance documents to ensure alignment with current scientific consensus and compliance expectations.
Analytical methods emphasized cross-validation between laboratory efficacy data and plant-level performance to identify common scaling risks and mitigation strategies. Scenario analysis explored procurement and supply chain sensitivities, including tariff impacts and lead-time variability, to generate actionable recommendations for sourcing and capital planning. Wherever possible, technology comparisons were grounded in published technical parameters such as inactivation mechanisms, product compatibility and processing throughput. The methodology prioritized transparency and reproducibility, documenting assumptions and data limitations so stakeholders can adapt the framework to their specific operational contexts and regulatory jurisdictions.
Synthesis of technical, commercial and organizational factors that determine whether non-thermal pasteurization delivers sustained product quality improvements and operational resilience
Non-thermal pasteurization stands at an inflection point where technical maturity, commercial readiness and regulatory engagement converge to create meaningful opportunities for food manufacturers seeking differentiation and sustainability gains. The technologies under consideration present distinct performance profiles and operational implications, but collectively they enable processors to meet consumer and retailer demands for fresher, higher-quality products while reducing thermal damage and, in many cases, energy consumption. The commercial pathway, however, remains contingent on rigorous validation, thoughtful procurement strategies and collaborative ecosystems that bridge equipment providers, processors and regulators.
Decision makers must therefore adopt an integrated perspective that balances technical efficacy with packaging compatibility, distribution realities and potential trade-related cost fluctuations. By prioritizing targeted pilots, establishing cross-functional validation teams and securing flexible procurement arrangements, organizations can convert experimental deployments into repeatable production processes. In doing so, they will not only improve product quality and extend shelf life in certain categories, but also build operational resilience and create pathways for long-term competitive advantage within increasingly discerning consumer markets.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
How non-thermal pasteurization is reshaping food safety, sensory quality and sustainability across production lines and product development pipelines
Non-thermal pasteurization is redefining the intersection of food safety, product quality and sustainability by offering alternatives to conventional heat-based processing that preserve sensory attributes and nutritional value while mitigating thermal degradation. Across multiple food categories, manufacturers increasingly consider technologies that inactivate pathogens and spoilage organisms without the collateral impacts associated with thermal pasteurization. This shift reflects converging pressures from consumer demand for fresher-tasting, minimally processed foods, heightened regulatory scrutiny around foodborne illness, and corporate commitments to reduce energy consumption and product waste.
In parallel, technology maturation and factory-level integration are lowering the barriers to pilot and commercial deployment. Technology providers have refined equipment footprints, improved throughput consistency and deepened validation data sets, which in turn reduces technical uncertainty for operations teams. Consequently, decision makers in product development, quality assurance and capital planning must reassess process design, packaging compatibility and shelf-life validation protocols. Understanding the technical trade-offs among alternative non-thermal approaches, the site-level operational changes required for implementation, and the regulatory pathways for process validation is now essential to converting exploratory pilots into reliable, scalable production.
Technology improvements, commercial integration and evolving consumer expectations are accelerating mainstream adoption of non-thermal pasteurization across supply chains
The landscape for non-thermal pasteurization has experienced transformative shifts driven by technological advances, strategic partnerships and evolving customer expectations. Innovations in process control, sensor integration, and combined-hurdle treatments have expanded the feasible application envelope for non-thermal methods, enabling processors to treat more complex product matrices while maintaining throughput targets. As a result, manufacturers now consider non-thermal options not merely as niche innovations but as strategic levers for product differentiation and cost containment.
Concurrently, commercial ecosystems have adapted: original equipment manufacturers and technology licensors have expanded testing services and demonstration centers to shorten the validation cycle, and contract manufacturers are offering co-packing services that accommodate new process modalities. On the demand side, retail and food service channels are responding to consumers’ preference for fresher, nutrient-dense products by prioritizing supplier innovations that meet label and sensory expectations. Taken together, these shifts lower adoption friction and create a stronger business case for integrating non-thermal processes into mainstream supply chains, while also elevating the importance of robust validation and traceability frameworks to satisfy regulatory and retailer requirements.
Assessing the operational and procurement consequences of 2025 tariffs on global supply chains for non-thermal pasteurization equipment and critical components
The imposition of tariffs and trade measures in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity for companies sourcing non-thermal processing equipment and specialized components from international suppliers. Many critical capital items, spare parts and consumables for advanced non-thermal systems are manufactured in a limited number of global hubs. Tariff-induced cost increases and longer customs cycles have compelled procurement teams to re-evaluate sourcing strategies, build redundancy into supplier networks and accelerate local supplier qualification where feasible.
Moreover, tariffs have affected investment decisions by altering the total cost of ownership for imported systems versus domestically produced alternatives. In response, some manufacturers have deferred capital projects or staged rollouts to minimize exposure to immediate tariff impacts, while others have renegotiated supplier terms, shifted toward modular or retrofit solutions shipped as kits, or pursued joint ventures to localize production. Regulatory harmonization efforts and trade discussions are gradually reducing some frictions, but the near-term environment requires closer coordination between sourcing, finance and operations to manage cash flow, inventory buffers and project timelines. Ultimately, firms that proactively model supply chain scenarios, diversify vendor exposure and incorporate tariff sensitivity into procurement evaluation will be best positioned to maintain deployment momentum despite trade-related headwinds.
Segment-driven insights reveal where product characteristics, technology modalities and packaging formats converge to determine non-thermal pasteurization suitability
A nuanced segmentation analysis clarifies where non-thermal pasteurization delivers the strongest operational and commercial benefits and where integration challenges persist. When examining product types, dairy products, juice and beverages, meat and seafood products, and processed fruits and vegetables each present distinct microbiological targets, thermal sensitivities and packaging considerations that influence technology selection and validation approaches. For example, high-acid beverages often allow for different process windows than low-acid dairy or protein-rich matrices, and that distinction drives both equipment choice and shelf-life strategy.
Evaluating technologies reveals that cold plasma, high pressure processing, ozone treatment, pulsed electric field, ultrasound, and ultraviolet solutions offer complementary performance characteristics. Some technologies excel at surface decontamination while others achieve volumetric inactivation, and combined-hurdle designs frequently enhance overall efficacy. Considering equipment form factors, both batch and continuous configurations warrant assessment: batch platforms often suit high-value or low-volume applications and facilitate flexible recipe development, whereas continuous systems deliver higher throughput for scaled production lines.
End users vary across food service providers, manufacturing plants, and retail outlets, each imposing different throughput, traceability and packaging requirements. Packaging choices - bottles, cans, cartons and pouches - interact with process compatibility and material permeability to shape shelf-life outcomes. Finally, distribution channels such as direct sales, distributors, and online channels affect inventory dynamics and the acceptable shelf-life margins, which in turn shape processing and packaging decisions. Integrating these segmentation lenses helps stakeholders prioritize pilots, design validation plans and align technology selection with commercial constraints and consumer expectations.
How regional regulatory frameworks, supply chain maturity and consumer preferences across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific drive adoption pathways
Regional dynamics shape both adoption velocity and the commercial pathways for non-thermal pasteurization, with distinct regulatory, supply chain and consumer preference drivers across major geographies. In the Americas, regulatory frameworks and a mature food innovation ecosystem support early adopters, especially among high-value beverage and ready-to-eat producers; logistics infrastructure and large-scale contract manufacturers facilitate pilot-to-commercial scale transitions. The presence of centralized testing facilities and a robust processing equipment manufacturing base further accelerates commercialization in targeted subsegments.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, a combination of stringent food safety standards, rising consumer demand for clean-label products and strong sustainability commitments from retailers drives interest in low-energy processing modalities. Fragmented retail systems and varying national regulatory interpretations require tailored validation strategies and close engagement with local authorities. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding cold-chain capabilities and a large base of small- and medium-sized processors create a fertile environment for scalable non-thermal solutions that reduce spoilage and enable premiumization. Cross-regionally, knowledge transfer, multinational CPG player pilots and localized equipment partnerships remain central mechanisms for scaling adoption, while region-specific incentives and subsidy programs can materially influence deployment economics.
Ecosystem dynamics among equipment makers, technology innovators, contract processors and adopters accelerate validation and commercial scaling of non-thermal processes
Market incumbents, technology specialists and emerging start-ups each play critical roles in advancing non-thermal pasteurization technologies from laboratory validation to full production integration. Leading equipment manufacturers focus on reliability, maintainability and integration support, investing in service networks and validation protocols that reduce operational risk for adopters. Technology specialists and academic consortia continue to refine process parameters and demonstrate efficacy across a broader set of product matrices, creating the empirical foundation needed for regulatory acceptance and retailer approvals.
At the same time, food manufacturers and co-packers that adopt early often act as important reference customers, documenting real-world performance and surfacing integration challenges related to throughput, cleaning regimes and packaging compatibility. Emerging entrants contribute disruptive approaches and software-enabled controls that improve process repeatability, while service providers expand capital models by offering equipment-as-a-service or contract processing to lower the barrier to entry. Strategic partnerships among these actors, including licensing agreements, joint pilots and shared demonstration facilities, accelerate learning curves and reduce time-to-validation, enabling broader commercial uptake.
Practical, phased strategies for procurement, validation and organizational alignment that minimize risk and accelerate commercial deployment of non-thermal systems
Industry leaders should adopt a phased, risk-managed approach to capture the benefits of non-thermal pasteurization while minimizing operational disruption. Begin by prioritizing high-impact pilot projects that align product portfolios with technology strengths, focusing first on products where nutrient retention, sensory quality and premium pricing compensate for integration costs. Simultaneously, invest in cross-functional teams that bring together quality, operations, procurement and regulatory affairs so validation plans address the full spectrum of technical and commercial requirements.
Procurement strategies must incorporate scenario planning for tariffs and supply chain disruptions, cultivating multiple qualified suppliers and evaluating modular retrofits that reduce lead time and capital intensity. To de-risk adoption, consider partnerships with contract manufacturers or pilot facilities to validate scaled runs before committing to line-level capital. Complement operational actions with clear consumer and trade messaging that explains product benefits and preserves brand equity during the transition. Lastly, integrate data-driven validation and digitized traceability into process design to expedite regulatory sign-off and to provide transparent evidence for retail and foodservice customers.
A transparent, reproducible research methodology combining primary interviews, technical validation and regulatory synthesis to inform deployment strategies
This research synthesizes primary interviews, technical validation reports and published regulatory guidance to construct a robust analytical framework for non-thermal pasteurization deployment. Primary interviews included process engineers, quality leaders, technology providers and contract manufacturers to capture real-world operational constraints and decision criteria. Secondary sources encompassed peer-reviewed literature on microbial inactivation kinetics, equipment technical specifications, and regulatory agency guidance documents to ensure alignment with current scientific consensus and compliance expectations.
Analytical methods emphasized cross-validation between laboratory efficacy data and plant-level performance to identify common scaling risks and mitigation strategies. Scenario analysis explored procurement and supply chain sensitivities, including tariff impacts and lead-time variability, to generate actionable recommendations for sourcing and capital planning. Wherever possible, technology comparisons were grounded in published technical parameters such as inactivation mechanisms, product compatibility and processing throughput. The methodology prioritized transparency and reproducibility, documenting assumptions and data limitations so stakeholders can adapt the framework to their specific operational contexts and regulatory jurisdictions.
Synthesis of technical, commercial and organizational factors that determine whether non-thermal pasteurization delivers sustained product quality improvements and operational resilience
Non-thermal pasteurization stands at an inflection point where technical maturity, commercial readiness and regulatory engagement converge to create meaningful opportunities for food manufacturers seeking differentiation and sustainability gains. The technologies under consideration present distinct performance profiles and operational implications, but collectively they enable processors to meet consumer and retailer demands for fresher, higher-quality products while reducing thermal damage and, in many cases, energy consumption. The commercial pathway, however, remains contingent on rigorous validation, thoughtful procurement strategies and collaborative ecosystems that bridge equipment providers, processors and regulators.
Decision makers must therefore adopt an integrated perspective that balances technical efficacy with packaging compatibility, distribution realities and potential trade-related cost fluctuations. By prioritizing targeted pilots, establishing cross-functional validation teams and securing flexible procurement arrangements, organizations can convert experimental deployments into repeatable production processes. In doing so, they will not only improve product quality and extend shelf life in certain categories, but also build operational resilience and create pathways for long-term competitive advantage within increasingly discerning consumer markets.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
195 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising implementation of high hydrostatic pressure technology in cold-pressed juice production lines
- 5.2. Emergence of pulsed electric field processing for enhancing probiotic viability in dairy beverages
- 5.3. Growing use of ultraviolet light pasteurization systems in clear beverage sterilization applications
- 5.4. Adoption of cold plasma treatment for microbial reduction on fresh produce and leafy greens
- 5.5. Integration of high-pressure processing with smart packaging sensors for real-time quality monitoring
- 5.6. Development of energy-efficient pulsed light systems for extended shelf life of ready-to-eat meat products
- 5.7. Regulatory alignment challenges for non-thermal pasteurization standards across international markets
- 5.8. Collaboration between equipment manufacturers and food processors to lower non-thermal system capital costs
- 5.9. Expansion of non-thermal pasteurization applications in plant-based and alternative protein beverages
- 5.10. Sustainability focus driving demand for low-energy high-pressure systems in organic food segment
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Dairy Products
- 8.2. Juice And Beverages
- 8.3. Meat And Seafood Products
- 8.4. Processed Fruits And Vegetables
- 9. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Cold Plasma
- 9.2. High Pressure Processing
- 9.3. Ozone Treatment
- 9.4. Pulsed Electric Field
- 9.5. Ultrasound
- 9.6. Ultraviolet
- 10. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Equipment
- 10.1. Batch
- 10.2. Continuous
- 11. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Packaging
- 11.1. Bottles
- 11.2. Cans
- 11.3. Cartons
- 11.4. Pouches
- 12. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by End User
- 12.1. Food Service Providers
- 12.2. Manufacturing Plants
- 12.3. Retail Outlets
- 13. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Distribution Channel
- 13.1. Direct Sales
- 13.2. Distributors
- 13.3. Online Channels
- 14. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Non-Thermal Pasteurization Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. American Pasteurization Company
- 17.3.2. AseptoRay Ltd.
- 17.3.3. BaoTou KeFa High Pressure Technology Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.4. Elea GmbH
- 17.3.5. EXDIN Solutions Sp. z o.o.
- 17.3.6. FresherTech North America by CHIC Group
- 17.3.7. GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
- 17.3.8. Hiperbaric S.A.
- 17.3.9. Impact Consumer Products Group
- 17.3.10. John Bean Technologies Corporation
- 17.3.11. Kobe Steel Ltd.
- 17.3.12. Krones AG
- 17.3.13. Marel hf.
- 17.3.14. MAXPRO Technologies Inc.
- 17.3.15. Pulsemaster
- 17.3.16. Quintus Technologies AB
- 17.3.17. Sadex Corporation
- 17.3.18. Sotera Health Company
- 17.3.19. SPX Flow, Inc.
- 17.3.20. Stansted Fluid Power (Products) Ltd.
- 17.3.21. thyssenkrupp Uhde GmbH
- 17.3.22. Ultrasonidos Lover, S.A.
- 17.3.23. Universal Pure, LLC
- 17.3.24. Zwirner Equipment Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
