Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market by Flow Rate Range (100-500 m3/h, Above 500 m3/h, Below 100 m3/h), Pressure Range (50-150 bar, Above 150 bar, Below To 50 bar), Drive Type, Rotor Material, Lubrication Type, Sales Channel, End User, Application -
Description
The Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market was valued at USD 2.58 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.72 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.59%, reaching USD 3.78 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction to progressing cavity pumps that frames their technical advantages, industrial applications, and essential considerations for procurement and operations
The executive summary that follows introduces the evolving landscape of multiphase progressing cavity pumps and summarizes the forces shaping procurement, operations, and aftermarket strategies. This introduction frames the technology’s core value proposition: enabling reliable handling of viscous, abrasive, or multiphase fluids while maintaining steady volumetric flow and pressure stability. It outlines the typical operating contexts where progressing cavity pumps deliver differentiated performance compared with centrifugal or reciprocating alternatives, particularly where shear sensitivity, solids content, or extreme viscosities challenge conventional pump types.
Across end users such as chemical processing, food and beverage production, marine applications, mining operations, oil and gas extraction, and water and wastewater treatment, progressing cavity designs are selected for their capacity to meter, transfer, and inject complex fluids without degrading product quality. The introduction highlights the interplay between application drivers - including chemical injection, evacuation, metering, pipeline transport, and wellhead boosting - and engineering choices such as rotor elastomer selection, lubrication strategy, and drive type. It also sets expectations for the remainder of the report by previewing coverage on regulatory shifts, tariff influences, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and recommended actions for industry leaders seeking resilience and growth.
How technology breakthroughs, material innovation, and supply chain reshaping are redefining performance expectations and procurement priorities in the pump industry
Significant transformative shifts are reshaping the progressing cavity pump landscape, driven by technology advances, evolving end‑user priorities, and tightened regulatory expectations. Electrification and smarter drive systems are being integrated into pump skids to increase energy efficiency and enable predictive maintenance through embedded sensors and remote monitoring capabilities. These integrations reduce unplanned downtime and improve lifecycle transparency, while also altering procurement criteria toward total cost of ownership rather than capital expense alone.
Concurrently, material science innovations in elastomers and thermoplastics are expanding performance envelopes by offering improved chemical compatibility, enhanced wear resistance, and longer service intervals. This is particularly impactful for applications that require specific rotor materials such as EPDM, HNBR, nitrile, or advanced thermoplastic compounds. In parallel, supply chain reconfiguration and diversification efforts are prompting OEMs and distributors to localize inventories and to strengthen aftermarket networks, which shortens lead times for critical components and supports rapid repairs. Finally, cross‑industry convergence in system integration, where pump suppliers collaborate with instrumentation and automation providers, is accelerating deployment of turnkey solutions for complex metering, injection, and pipeline transport applications.
How 2025 tariff changes are compelling hybrid sourcing strategies, localized manufacturing investments, and revised inventory policies across pump supply chains
United States tariff adjustments announced for 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for manufacturers, OEMs, and end users operating within global supply chains. The tariff environment has led many buying organizations to reassess sourcing strategies for critical pump components and finished units, prompting shifts toward local suppliers and regional manufacturing partners to mitigate exposure to duties and border delays. For pump producers that rely on imported elastomers, precision machined parts, or specialized drives, the tariff effects have increased the incentives to qualify alternative materials and to reengineer assemblies for manufacturability within tariff‑friendly jurisdictions.
Beyond cost considerations, tariffs are accelerating conversations about inventory policy and risk management. Firms are balancing higher input costs against the operational risks of elongated lead times, sometimes electing to increase safety stock for high‑criticality spares or to invest in local machining capacity for rotors and stators. Regulatory compliance and customs documentation have also gained prominence as procurement teams seek to avoid inadvertent noncompliance which can compound cost and schedule impacts. Importantly, rather than prompting a simple retreat from global sourcing, the tariff landscape is catalyzing hybrid strategies that blend nearshoring, dual sourcing, and strategic partnerships to preserve supply continuity while managing landed cost.
Segment-level intelligence showing how end-user demands, material selection, pressure and flow requirements, and commercial channels shape product strategies
Segmentation analysis reveals nuanced opportunity pockets driven by application-specific performance requirements, material compatibility needs, and preferred commercial channels. Based on end user, the market spans chemical, food & beverage, marine, mining, oil & gas, and water & wastewater environments, each imposing unique regulatory demands, contamination risks, and maintenance regimes. Based on application, solutions differentiate around chemical injection, evacuation, metering, pipeline transport, and wellhead boosting, and chemical injection in particular requires tailored compatibility for chemistries such as corrosion inhibitors, demulsifiers, hydrate inhibitors, and scale inhibitors, which in turn influence rotor and stator material selection.
Based on flow rate range, product lines are oriented to service up to 100 m3/h, 100–500 m3/h, and above 500 m3/h scenarios, with sizing decisions closely tied to system hydraulics and downstream equipment. Based on pressure range, systems are designed for up to 50 bar, 50–150 bar, and above 150 bar pressures, driving different sealing strategies and gearbox specifications. Drive type segmentation separates electric motor, gas engine, and hydraulic motor solutions, reflecting site power availability and mobility requirements. Rotor material options such as EPDM, HNBR, nitrile, and thermoplastic influence chemical resistance and abrasion tolerance, while lubrication type-grease lubricated versus oil lubricated-affects maintenance intervals and contamination control. Finally, sales channel dynamics, whether direct sales, distribution, or OEM partnerships, shape procurement cycles, aftermarket support expectations, and the ability to bundle services like installation and condition monitoring.
Regional dynamics and infrastructure trends that influence progressing cavity pump adoption, aftermarket readiness, and localization of support services across global markets
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on technology adoption, supply chain design, and aftermarket service models. In the Americas, investments in upstream oil and gas recovery technologies and in municipal water infrastructure favor robust progressing cavity solutions that prioritize survivability in abrasive or solids‑laden fluids, and there is a growing appetite for integrated automation to support remote field operations. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency around chemical handling, emissions, and energy efficiency is accelerating adoption of compliant elastomers and more efficient drive configurations, while the region’s diverse climatic and operational conditions drive demand for localized service ecosystems and material variants adapted to extreme temperatures.
Asia‑Pacific presents a heterogeneous opportunity set characterized by rapid industrialization, expanding petrochemical capacity, and large municipal water projects. This region’s procurement patterns tend toward price‑sensitive volume purchases in some segments, combined with pockets of advanced adoption where original equipment manufacturers and national oil companies prioritize long‑term reliability and lifecycle cost. Across all regions, aftermarket responsiveness, spare parts localization, and the ability to provide training and field support remain critical differentiators for suppliers seeking to convert deployments into long‑term installed bases.
Competitive positioning and capability mapping that reveal how manufacturers, aftermarket specialists, and integrators are competing on service depth and material innovation
Competitive dynamics are defined by a mix of specialized pump manufacturers, global original equipment manufacturers, aftermarket specialists, and systems integrators. Leading suppliers differentiate through engineering depth, material science capabilities, and the breadth of integrated services they provide, including value‑added offerings such as diagnostic subscriptions, onsite repair networks, and engineering consultancy for complex multiphase installations. Suppliers that maintain vertically aligned manufacturing for critical components like rotors and stators are better positioned to control quality and lead times, while collaborative partnerships with elastomer and seal specialists have become an important source of performance differentiation.
Aftermarket-focused players and authorized distribution partners frequently serve as the primary interface for maintenance, spare parts, and retrofit solutions, enabling faster turnaround and tailored rebuild programs that extend asset life. Systems integrators and automation providers are increasingly important as customers demand turnkey skids and packaged offerings where pump selection, drive systems, instrumentation, and control logic are validated end‑to‑end. Strategic imperatives for companies in this space include investing in digital capabilities for condition‑based maintenance, accelerating R&D into more chemically and abrasion‑resistant materials, and expanding service footprints to support customers in remote or high‑uptime industries.
Actionable recommendations for manufacturers and service providers to reduce supply risk, monetize aftermarket services, and accelerate delivery of integrated pump solutions
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to secure competitive advantage, mitigate tariff and supply chain risk, and accelerate customer value delivery. First, prioritize modular product architectures and standardized interfaces that simplify customization while enabling economies of scale; this reduces lead time and eases spare parts management. Second, expand local repair and remanufacturing capabilities in key regional markets to shorten turnaround, lower exposure to cross‑border duties, and support higher service levels for mission‑critical installations. Third, invest in material qualification programs to broaden acceptable rotor and stator material portfolios so that alternative elastomers and thermoplastics can be rapidly validated when supply constraints arise.
Additionally, deepen aftermarket offerings by introducing condition‑based maintenance programs and subscription services that convert sporadic service revenues into recurring income and provide better lifetime performance data. Strengthen partnerships across the automation and instrumentation ecosystem to deliver integrated skids and validated control packages for metering, chemical injection, and wellhead boosting. Finally, create flexible commercial arrangements-such as dual sourcing agreements, localized consignment stocks, and performance‑linked service contracts-that align incentives with customers and reduce procurement friction in regulated or remote operations.
A transparent methodology integrating practitioner interviews, technical validation, and supplier mapping to produce actionable insights while minimizing bias
The research approach combined qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical literature review, and cross‑validation of supplier capabilities to arrive at a robust evidence base. Primary engagement included structured discussions with engineering managers, maintenance leads, procurement professionals, and aftermarket service providers to capture real‑world constraints, failure modes, and decision criteria for progressing cavity pump selection. These conversations were complemented by a targeted review of technical publications, product documentation, and patent filings to trace material and design innovation trends, as well as to verify claims around durability and chemical compatibility.
To ensure balanced perspective, supplier offerings were mapped against application requirements, with special attention to the interplay between elastomer chemistry, drive selection, lubrication regimes, and pressure/flow envelope. Regional market dynamics were assessed through examination of infrastructure investments, regulatory frameworks, and public procurement patterns. Where possible, secondary data sources on component lead times, tariff schedules, and logistics indicators were used to triangulate insights on supply chain friction. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions, and findings were subjected to expert review to minimize bias and to ensure technical fidelity across the report’s recommendations.
Key takeaways on resilience, material innovation, and service strategies that will determine long-term competitiveness for progressing cavity pump stakeholders
In conclusion, progressing cavity pumps remain a vital technology for handling complex multiphase and viscous fluids across industrial verticals, and their strategic importance is intensifying as operators demand higher reliability, lower lifecycle cost, and tighter integration with automation systems. The combined influence of material advances, electrification, and regional supply chain reconfiguration is reshaping product roadmaps and aftermarket strategies. Companies that respond by diversifying material approvals, localizing critical manufacturing and repair capacity, and expanding condition‑based service offerings will be better positioned to capture durable advantages.
Looking forward, the industry will continue to favor solutions that offer predictable performance under harsh conditions, simplified serviceability, and digital readiness for predictive maintenance. These attributes will be decisive in procurement evaluations for applications ranging from precise chemical injection to high‑pressure pipeline transport and wellhead boosting. By aligning engineering priorities with commercial innovations and regional service models, manufacturers and service providers can convert emerging challenges into opportunities for differentiation and long‑term customer partnerships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction to progressing cavity pumps that frames their technical advantages, industrial applications, and essential considerations for procurement and operations
The executive summary that follows introduces the evolving landscape of multiphase progressing cavity pumps and summarizes the forces shaping procurement, operations, and aftermarket strategies. This introduction frames the technology’s core value proposition: enabling reliable handling of viscous, abrasive, or multiphase fluids while maintaining steady volumetric flow and pressure stability. It outlines the typical operating contexts where progressing cavity pumps deliver differentiated performance compared with centrifugal or reciprocating alternatives, particularly where shear sensitivity, solids content, or extreme viscosities challenge conventional pump types.
Across end users such as chemical processing, food and beverage production, marine applications, mining operations, oil and gas extraction, and water and wastewater treatment, progressing cavity designs are selected for their capacity to meter, transfer, and inject complex fluids without degrading product quality. The introduction highlights the interplay between application drivers - including chemical injection, evacuation, metering, pipeline transport, and wellhead boosting - and engineering choices such as rotor elastomer selection, lubrication strategy, and drive type. It also sets expectations for the remainder of the report by previewing coverage on regulatory shifts, tariff influences, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, and recommended actions for industry leaders seeking resilience and growth.
How technology breakthroughs, material innovation, and supply chain reshaping are redefining performance expectations and procurement priorities in the pump industry
Significant transformative shifts are reshaping the progressing cavity pump landscape, driven by technology advances, evolving end‑user priorities, and tightened regulatory expectations. Electrification and smarter drive systems are being integrated into pump skids to increase energy efficiency and enable predictive maintenance through embedded sensors and remote monitoring capabilities. These integrations reduce unplanned downtime and improve lifecycle transparency, while also altering procurement criteria toward total cost of ownership rather than capital expense alone.
Concurrently, material science innovations in elastomers and thermoplastics are expanding performance envelopes by offering improved chemical compatibility, enhanced wear resistance, and longer service intervals. This is particularly impactful for applications that require specific rotor materials such as EPDM, HNBR, nitrile, or advanced thermoplastic compounds. In parallel, supply chain reconfiguration and diversification efforts are prompting OEMs and distributors to localize inventories and to strengthen aftermarket networks, which shortens lead times for critical components and supports rapid repairs. Finally, cross‑industry convergence in system integration, where pump suppliers collaborate with instrumentation and automation providers, is accelerating deployment of turnkey solutions for complex metering, injection, and pipeline transport applications.
How 2025 tariff changes are compelling hybrid sourcing strategies, localized manufacturing investments, and revised inventory policies across pump supply chains
United States tariff adjustments announced for 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity for manufacturers, OEMs, and end users operating within global supply chains. The tariff environment has led many buying organizations to reassess sourcing strategies for critical pump components and finished units, prompting shifts toward local suppliers and regional manufacturing partners to mitigate exposure to duties and border delays. For pump producers that rely on imported elastomers, precision machined parts, or specialized drives, the tariff effects have increased the incentives to qualify alternative materials and to reengineer assemblies for manufacturability within tariff‑friendly jurisdictions.
Beyond cost considerations, tariffs are accelerating conversations about inventory policy and risk management. Firms are balancing higher input costs against the operational risks of elongated lead times, sometimes electing to increase safety stock for high‑criticality spares or to invest in local machining capacity for rotors and stators. Regulatory compliance and customs documentation have also gained prominence as procurement teams seek to avoid inadvertent noncompliance which can compound cost and schedule impacts. Importantly, rather than prompting a simple retreat from global sourcing, the tariff landscape is catalyzing hybrid strategies that blend nearshoring, dual sourcing, and strategic partnerships to preserve supply continuity while managing landed cost.
Segment-level intelligence showing how end-user demands, material selection, pressure and flow requirements, and commercial channels shape product strategies
Segmentation analysis reveals nuanced opportunity pockets driven by application-specific performance requirements, material compatibility needs, and preferred commercial channels. Based on end user, the market spans chemical, food & beverage, marine, mining, oil & gas, and water & wastewater environments, each imposing unique regulatory demands, contamination risks, and maintenance regimes. Based on application, solutions differentiate around chemical injection, evacuation, metering, pipeline transport, and wellhead boosting, and chemical injection in particular requires tailored compatibility for chemistries such as corrosion inhibitors, demulsifiers, hydrate inhibitors, and scale inhibitors, which in turn influence rotor and stator material selection.
Based on flow rate range, product lines are oriented to service up to 100 m3/h, 100–500 m3/h, and above 500 m3/h scenarios, with sizing decisions closely tied to system hydraulics and downstream equipment. Based on pressure range, systems are designed for up to 50 bar, 50–150 bar, and above 150 bar pressures, driving different sealing strategies and gearbox specifications. Drive type segmentation separates electric motor, gas engine, and hydraulic motor solutions, reflecting site power availability and mobility requirements. Rotor material options such as EPDM, HNBR, nitrile, and thermoplastic influence chemical resistance and abrasion tolerance, while lubrication type-grease lubricated versus oil lubricated-affects maintenance intervals and contamination control. Finally, sales channel dynamics, whether direct sales, distribution, or OEM partnerships, shape procurement cycles, aftermarket support expectations, and the ability to bundle services like installation and condition monitoring.
Regional dynamics and infrastructure trends that influence progressing cavity pump adoption, aftermarket readiness, and localization of support services across global markets
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on technology adoption, supply chain design, and aftermarket service models. In the Americas, investments in upstream oil and gas recovery technologies and in municipal water infrastructure favor robust progressing cavity solutions that prioritize survivability in abrasive or solids‑laden fluids, and there is a growing appetite for integrated automation to support remote field operations. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency around chemical handling, emissions, and energy efficiency is accelerating adoption of compliant elastomers and more efficient drive configurations, while the region’s diverse climatic and operational conditions drive demand for localized service ecosystems and material variants adapted to extreme temperatures.
Asia‑Pacific presents a heterogeneous opportunity set characterized by rapid industrialization, expanding petrochemical capacity, and large municipal water projects. This region’s procurement patterns tend toward price‑sensitive volume purchases in some segments, combined with pockets of advanced adoption where original equipment manufacturers and national oil companies prioritize long‑term reliability and lifecycle cost. Across all regions, aftermarket responsiveness, spare parts localization, and the ability to provide training and field support remain critical differentiators for suppliers seeking to convert deployments into long‑term installed bases.
Competitive positioning and capability mapping that reveal how manufacturers, aftermarket specialists, and integrators are competing on service depth and material innovation
Competitive dynamics are defined by a mix of specialized pump manufacturers, global original equipment manufacturers, aftermarket specialists, and systems integrators. Leading suppliers differentiate through engineering depth, material science capabilities, and the breadth of integrated services they provide, including value‑added offerings such as diagnostic subscriptions, onsite repair networks, and engineering consultancy for complex multiphase installations. Suppliers that maintain vertically aligned manufacturing for critical components like rotors and stators are better positioned to control quality and lead times, while collaborative partnerships with elastomer and seal specialists have become an important source of performance differentiation.
Aftermarket-focused players and authorized distribution partners frequently serve as the primary interface for maintenance, spare parts, and retrofit solutions, enabling faster turnaround and tailored rebuild programs that extend asset life. Systems integrators and automation providers are increasingly important as customers demand turnkey skids and packaged offerings where pump selection, drive systems, instrumentation, and control logic are validated end‑to‑end. Strategic imperatives for companies in this space include investing in digital capabilities for condition‑based maintenance, accelerating R&D into more chemically and abrasion‑resistant materials, and expanding service footprints to support customers in remote or high‑uptime industries.
Actionable recommendations for manufacturers and service providers to reduce supply risk, monetize aftermarket services, and accelerate delivery of integrated pump solutions
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic actions to secure competitive advantage, mitigate tariff and supply chain risk, and accelerate customer value delivery. First, prioritize modular product architectures and standardized interfaces that simplify customization while enabling economies of scale; this reduces lead time and eases spare parts management. Second, expand local repair and remanufacturing capabilities in key regional markets to shorten turnaround, lower exposure to cross‑border duties, and support higher service levels for mission‑critical installations. Third, invest in material qualification programs to broaden acceptable rotor and stator material portfolios so that alternative elastomers and thermoplastics can be rapidly validated when supply constraints arise.
Additionally, deepen aftermarket offerings by introducing condition‑based maintenance programs and subscription services that convert sporadic service revenues into recurring income and provide better lifetime performance data. Strengthen partnerships across the automation and instrumentation ecosystem to deliver integrated skids and validated control packages for metering, chemical injection, and wellhead boosting. Finally, create flexible commercial arrangements-such as dual sourcing agreements, localized consignment stocks, and performance‑linked service contracts-that align incentives with customers and reduce procurement friction in regulated or remote operations.
A transparent methodology integrating practitioner interviews, technical validation, and supplier mapping to produce actionable insights while minimizing bias
The research approach combined qualitative interviews with industry practitioners, technical literature review, and cross‑validation of supplier capabilities to arrive at a robust evidence base. Primary engagement included structured discussions with engineering managers, maintenance leads, procurement professionals, and aftermarket service providers to capture real‑world constraints, failure modes, and decision criteria for progressing cavity pump selection. These conversations were complemented by a targeted review of technical publications, product documentation, and patent filings to trace material and design innovation trends, as well as to verify claims around durability and chemical compatibility.
To ensure balanced perspective, supplier offerings were mapped against application requirements, with special attention to the interplay between elastomer chemistry, drive selection, lubrication regimes, and pressure/flow envelope. Regional market dynamics were assessed through examination of infrastructure investments, regulatory frameworks, and public procurement patterns. Where possible, secondary data sources on component lead times, tariff schedules, and logistics indicators were used to triangulate insights on supply chain friction. The methodology emphasized transparency in assumptions, and findings were subjected to expert review to minimize bias and to ensure technical fidelity across the report’s recommendations.
Key takeaways on resilience, material innovation, and service strategies that will determine long-term competitiveness for progressing cavity pump stakeholders
In conclusion, progressing cavity pumps remain a vital technology for handling complex multiphase and viscous fluids across industrial verticals, and their strategic importance is intensifying as operators demand higher reliability, lower lifecycle cost, and tighter integration with automation systems. The combined influence of material advances, electrification, and regional supply chain reconfiguration is reshaping product roadmaps and aftermarket strategies. Companies that respond by diversifying material approvals, localizing critical manufacturing and repair capacity, and expanding condition‑based service offerings will be better positioned to capture durable advantages.
Looking forward, the industry will continue to favor solutions that offer predictable performance under harsh conditions, simplified serviceability, and digital readiness for predictive maintenance. These attributes will be decisive in procurement evaluations for applications ranging from precise chemical injection to high‑pressure pipeline transport and wellhead boosting. By aligning engineering priorities with commercial innovations and regional service models, manufacturers and service providers can convert emerging challenges into opportunities for differentiation and long‑term customer partnerships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Flow Rate Range
- 8.1. 100-500 m3/h
- 8.2. Above 500 m3/h
- 8.3. Below 100 m3/h
- 9. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Pressure Range
- 9.1. 50-150 bar
- 9.2. Above 150 bar
- 9.3. Below To 50 bar
- 10. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Drive Type
- 10.1. Electric Motor
- 10.2. Gas Engine
- 10.3. Hydraulic Motor
- 11. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Rotor Material
- 11.1. Epdm
- 11.2. Hnbr
- 11.3. Nitrile
- 11.4. Thermoplastic
- 12. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Lubrication Type
- 12.1. Grease Lubricated
- 12.2. Oil Lubricated
- 13. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Sales Channel
- 13.1. Online
- 13.2. Offline
- 14. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by End User
- 14.1. Chemical
- 14.2. Food & Beverage
- 14.3. Marine
- 14.4. Mining
- 14.5. Oil & Gas
- 14.6. Water & Wastewater
- 15. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Application
- 15.1. Chemical Injection
- 15.1.1. Corrosion Inhibitors
- 15.1.2. Demulsifiers
- 15.1.3. Hydrate Inhibitors
- 15.1.4. Scale Inhibitors
- 15.2. Evacuation
- 15.3. Metering
- 15.4. Pipeline Transport
- 15.5. Wellhead Boosting
- 16. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Region
- 16.1. Americas
- 16.1.1. North America
- 16.1.2. Latin America
- 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 16.2.1. Europe
- 16.2.2. Middle East
- 16.2.3. Africa
- 16.3. Asia-Pacific
- 17. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Group
- 17.1. ASEAN
- 17.2. GCC
- 17.3. European Union
- 17.4. BRICS
- 17.5. G7
- 17.6. NATO
- 18. Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market, by Country
- 18.1. United States
- 18.2. Canada
- 18.3. Mexico
- 18.4. Brazil
- 18.5. United Kingdom
- 18.6. Germany
- 18.7. France
- 18.8. Russia
- 18.9. Italy
- 18.10. Spain
- 18.11. China
- 18.12. India
- 18.13. Japan
- 18.14. Australia
- 18.15. South Korea
- 19. United States Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market
- 20. China Multiphase Progressing Cavity Pump Market
- 21. Competitive Landscape
- 21.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 21.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 21.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 21.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 21.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 21.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 21.5. Allweiler GmbH
- 21.6. Baker Hughes Company
- 21.7. Borets International Limited
- 21.8. CIRCOR International Inc.
- 21.9. Continental Pump Company Inc.
- 21.10. Ebara Corporation
- 21.11. Flowserve Corporation
- 21.12. Graco Inc.
- 21.13. Halliburton Company
- 21.14. Heishin Ltd
- 21.15. ITT Bornemann GmbH
- 21.16. Leistritz Pumpen GmbH
- 21.17. Liberty Process Equipment Inc.
- 21.18. Moyno LLC
- 21.19. NETZSCH Holding GmbH & Co. Holding KG
- 21.20. NOV Inc.
- 21.21. Nova Rotors Srl
- 21.22. PCM S.A.
- 21.23. Pumpenfabrik Wangen GmbH
- 21.24. Roto Pumps Limited
- 21.25. Schlumberger Limited
- 21.26. SEEPEX GmbH
- 21.27. Sulzer Ltd
- 21.28. Weatherford International plc
- 21.29. Xylem Inc
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
