Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market by Brake Type (Combined, Three Channel, Two Channel), Technology (Conventional ABS, Cornering ABS, Cornering With Integrated Control), Motorcycle Type, End-Use, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market was valued at USD 4.64 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.95 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.83%, reaching USD 7.89 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction to contemporary motorcycle ABS technologies, regulatory context, and the engineering shifts reshaping product differentiation and rider safety
Motorcycle anti-lock braking systems (ABS) have evolved from optional safety enhancements into essential components that define both rider experience and regulatory compliance. This introduction situates ABS within the broader context of vehicle safety systems, highlighting how design complexity, sensor integration, and software control now differentiate product offerings. While early iterations emphasized basic slip prevention, current development trajectories prioritize dynamic stability, cornering performance, and seamless integration with broader vehicle control systems.
Concurrently, OEM priorities and rider expectations have shifted. Manufacturers increasingly view ABS not only as a compliance item but also as a feature set that influences product positioning across motorcycle categories. Engineers and procurement teams now coordinate closely with braking suppliers to align mechanical architecture with sensor packages and control software. As a result, the technology roadmap includes both incremental improvements to conventional ABS and concerted investments in advanced cornering solutions that incorporate inertial sensing and multi-axis control. These trends underscore the need for strategic alignment across R&D, supply chain, and regulatory affairs to realize the full potential of ABS technologies in modern motorcycles.
How advances in sensor fusion, software-led suppliers, and heightened regulatory expectations are reshaping motorcycle ABS development and supplier strategies
The landscape for motorcycle ABS is undergoing several transformative shifts that recalibrate how safety, performance, and connectivity converge. The first shift is technical: sensor fusion and inertial measurement capabilities have expanded the functional envelope of ABS systems from simple slip mitigation to proactive stability management during complex maneuvers. This technical evolution enables cornering ABS features that operate in concert with yaw and roll data, thereby improving rider confidence and reducing incident severity in dynamic situations.
A parallel shift is organizational and commercial. Tier structure and supplier relationships have adapted as software competency becomes as important as mechanical know-how. Firms with embedded control expertise and strong software development practices are gaining influence, prompting traditional component suppliers to form closer partnerships or acquire capabilities. In addition, regulatory frameworks and harmonized testing protocols have tightened safety expectations, prompting manufacturers to prioritize validated system behavior under a broader set of operating conditions. Finally, user expectations around comfort, rideability, and electronic assistance have elevated ABS from a safety add-on to a core feature that shapes vehicle segmentation and marketing approaches. These combined shifts will continue to favor solutions that integrate sensing, control, and cross-domain coordination while remaining resilient to supply-chain and policy headwinds.
Assessing the layered effects of 2025 United States tariff actions on sourcing choices, design modularity, and supply resilience across motorcycle ABS value chains
The imposition of tariffs in the United States in 2025 has produced layered effects across the motorcycle ABS ecosystem, influencing sourcing decisions, product architecture, and risk management approaches. At the component level, increased duties on imported parts elevated landed costs for assembly operations that relied on cross-border sourcing of electronic modules, IMU sensors, and specialized hydraulic components. As a result, original equipment manufacturers reassessed global bill-of-material strategies and accelerated conversations about component localization and dual-sourcing to stabilize production economics.
Supply chain responses extended beyond simple supplier replacement. Engineering teams re-evaluated modularity and the localization-readiness of control units, prioritizing designs that could accommodate multiple sensor vendors and regional component variations with minimal validation overhead. Procurement organizations increased emphasis on long-term contracts and supplier performance clauses to mitigate volatility. Simultaneously, some manufacturers explored nearshoring options to reduce tariff exposure and compress lead times, while others adjusted end-customer pricing structures where market tolerances permitted. In the longer term, these adjustments fostered a clearer separation between tactical responses to trade policy and strategic investments in resilient architectures that preserve product functionality despite varying input origins.
Deep segmentation analysis explaining how technology types, brake architectures, and motorcycle categories interact to determine engineering priorities and commercial positioning
Segmentation insight requires careful attention to how technology pathways, brake architectures, and vehicle classes interact to shape development priorities and commercial positioning. Based on Technology, the competitive landscape spans Conventional ABS, Cornering ABS, and Cornering With Integrated Control, with cornering solutions subdivided into 6 Axis ABS and IMU Based ABS. Conventional ABS continues to serve cost-sensitive segments and legacy platforms where proven slip mitigation meets regulatory thresholds, while Cornering ABS targets performance and rider confidence in dynamic situations and benefits from richer inertial datasets. The 6 Axis and IMU-based approaches each present distinct integration challenges: the former emphasizes multi-sensor mechanical coordination, and the latter centers on sensor fusion algorithms and calibration fidelity.
Based on Brake Type, classification across Combined, Three Channel, and Two Channel architectures influences both packaging and fault-tolerance strategies. Combined braking systems can simplify rider interactions and support electronic distribution, whereas three-channel and two-channel layouts present differing trade-offs in redundancy, cost, and mechanical complexity. These trade-offs manifest in validation scopes and aftermarket servicing considerations. Based on Motorcycle Type, differentiation spans Cruiser, Off Road, Sport, Standard, and Touring, with Sport further split into Adventure Sport and Supersport variants. Cruiser and Touring applications emphasize comfort, stability, and long-duration reliability, whereas Off Road and Sport variants demand aggressive dynamic control and ruggedization. Within Sport, Adventure Sport platforms favor broader operating envelopes and multi-terrain adaptability while Supersport platforms prioritize compact mass, rapid response, and thermal management under high-performance conditions. Each segmentation axis therefore drives distinct engineering priorities, aftermarket strategies, and certification pathways that suppliers and OEMs must reconcile when proposing scalable ABS solutions.
Regional dynamics and regulatory variations shaping ABS technology adoption, supply localization, certification priorities, and aftermarket support across major global markets
Regional dynamics continue to condition strategic choices across the ABS ecosystem, with clear differentiation across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific in terms of regulation, manufacturing footprint, and consumer expectations. In the Americas, regulatory frameworks and consumer safety campaigns encourage broad adoption of ABS features across passenger motorcycle classes, while regional manufacturing bases favor suppliers that can provide integrated modules with consistent quality and aftermarket support. The Americas also exhibit a mix of premium and value-oriented segments, which shapes product positioning for both OEMs and Tier suppliers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous environment with stringent homologation processes in several jurisdictions and high expectations for functional safety and documentation. This region emphasizes certification, diagnostics, and serviceability, creating demand for systems that can demonstrate robustness in testing and predictable in-service behavior. In contrast, Asia-Pacific is characterized by diverse adoption curves and a concentrated manufacturing ecosystem. High-volume production and strong OEM presences in certain countries encourage cost-optimized solutions, while rapid technological adoption in other markets has driven early uptake of advanced cornering features. Across regions, localization of supply, regulatory alignment, and aftersales network readiness remain decisive factors for successful ABS deployment and support.
Corporate strategies and competitive moves showing why software-led capabilities, sensor partnerships, and supply resilience are decisive differentiators for ABS suppliers
Leading companies in the ABS domain are aligning their strategic plays around software competence, sensor partnerships, and platform modularity to capture value beyond hardware. Suppliers that combine mechanical braking expertise with embedded control teams can offer differentiated integration packages, accelerating adoption by OEMs that seek single-source responsibility for system behavior. Meanwhile, firms that invest in robust calibration toolchains and model-based development shorten validation cycles and facilitate multi-variant deployments across motorcycle platforms.
Commercially, strategic partnerships and selective acquisitions have emerged as effective levers to access niche capabilities such as high-performance IMUs, functional safety toolchains, and over-the-air update infrastructures. At the same time, aftersales capabilities and diagnostic ecosystems provide service revenue opportunities and strengthen customer lock-in. Companies that maintain transparent component roadmaps and open integration APIs reduce validation friction for OEMs and increase their attractiveness as long-term partners. Equally important is operational resilience; firms that have diversified supplier networks, dual-sourcing plans for critical semiconductors, and geographically distributed manufacturing can better absorb shocks from policy shifts and component shortages. Collectively, these company-level moves indicate a competitive environment where multidisciplinary capability sets and supply-chain robustness determine commercial momentum.
Actionable strategic and tactical recommendations for OEMs and suppliers to accelerate ABS innovation, secure supply chains, and optimize commercialization across global programs
Industry leaders should adopt a coordinated set of actions that marry product innovation with supply-chain resilience and go-to-market clarity. First, prioritize modular architectures that let control units accept multiple sensor inputs and allow incremental feature upgrades without complete hardware redesign. This approach reduces validation cycles and enables localized sourcing choices without fragmenting the product line. Second, invest in embedded software and calibration platforms, because algorithmic differentiation for IMU-based cornering solutions will determine performance perception and liability management. These investments should be accompanied by rigorous functional safety processes and continuous integration practices to shorten time-to-certification.
Third, pursue diversified sourcing strategies that mix global suppliers, regional specialists, and qualified secondary vendors to lower trade-policy exposure while maintaining quality. Fourth, strengthen aftermarket and diagnostic frameworks to capture service revenue and ensure consistent in-service performance; remote diagnostics and calibrated replacement strategies improve uptime and customer satisfaction. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and standards bodies to shape test protocols and ensure early alignment on new safety expectations. Finally, align commercial models to accommodate both OEM program requirements and retrofit opportunities, offering tiered product variants that reflect differing cost and performance thresholds across motorcycle categories.
An integrated mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, technical verification, supplier mapping, and standards analysis to inform validated ABS insights
The research adopts a mixed-methods approach that integrates primary expert input, technical review, and structured supply-chain analysis to produce robust, actionable findings. Primary data was gathered through confidential interviews and workshops with product managers, systems engineers, and procurement leads across OEMs and tiered suppliers, allowing for triangulation of engineering priorities and commercial constraints. This qualitative work was complemented by technical assessments of sensor modalities, control architectures, and verification regimes to evaluate how different implementations perform under constrained and extreme conditions.
In parallel, a detailed supplier-mapping exercise analyzed component provenance, assembly footprints, and certification histories to identify resilience vectors and potential bottlenecks. Patent landscape reviews and standards analysis provided insight into emerging functional safety patterns and software architectures, while trade and regulatory documentation informed the assessment of policy impacts and compliance requirements. Findings were validated through iterative peer review with industry experts to ensure that conclusions reflect practical realities and not solely theoretical constructs. The methodology emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and a clear line-of-sight from evidence to recommendation to support confident decision-making.
Concluding synthesis emphasizing the convergence of software-defined control, modular hardware, and supply-chain resilience as the defining priorities for ABS competitiveness
In conclusion, the motorcycle ABS space stands at a pivotal intersection of mechanical engineering and software-defined control, shaped by regulatory pressures, consumer expectations, and evolving trade dynamics. Advanced cornering capabilities and IMU-driven control systems represent the technological frontier, while brake architecture choices and vehicle segmentation continue to influence practical engineering trade-offs. Supply-chain resilience, driven by diversified sourcing and modular design strategies, proves essential to absorb geopolitical and policy shocks without sacrificing product integrity.
Companies that align product roadmaps with software capability development, robust calibration infrastructure, and proactive regulatory engagement will be best placed to convert technological advantage into commercial success. As stakeholders evaluate investments, they should emphasize architectures and partnerships that permit adaptability across regions and vehicle classes, and they should treat functional safety and aftersales diagnostics as core strategic assets rather than compliance costs. The path forward is one of integrated capability building: pairing mechanical excellence with software depth and supply-chain foresight to deliver ABS solutions that meet both performance expectations and real-world operational demands.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction to contemporary motorcycle ABS technologies, regulatory context, and the engineering shifts reshaping product differentiation and rider safety
Motorcycle anti-lock braking systems (ABS) have evolved from optional safety enhancements into essential components that define both rider experience and regulatory compliance. This introduction situates ABS within the broader context of vehicle safety systems, highlighting how design complexity, sensor integration, and software control now differentiate product offerings. While early iterations emphasized basic slip prevention, current development trajectories prioritize dynamic stability, cornering performance, and seamless integration with broader vehicle control systems.
Concurrently, OEM priorities and rider expectations have shifted. Manufacturers increasingly view ABS not only as a compliance item but also as a feature set that influences product positioning across motorcycle categories. Engineers and procurement teams now coordinate closely with braking suppliers to align mechanical architecture with sensor packages and control software. As a result, the technology roadmap includes both incremental improvements to conventional ABS and concerted investments in advanced cornering solutions that incorporate inertial sensing and multi-axis control. These trends underscore the need for strategic alignment across R&D, supply chain, and regulatory affairs to realize the full potential of ABS technologies in modern motorcycles.
How advances in sensor fusion, software-led suppliers, and heightened regulatory expectations are reshaping motorcycle ABS development and supplier strategies
The landscape for motorcycle ABS is undergoing several transformative shifts that recalibrate how safety, performance, and connectivity converge. The first shift is technical: sensor fusion and inertial measurement capabilities have expanded the functional envelope of ABS systems from simple slip mitigation to proactive stability management during complex maneuvers. This technical evolution enables cornering ABS features that operate in concert with yaw and roll data, thereby improving rider confidence and reducing incident severity in dynamic situations.
A parallel shift is organizational and commercial. Tier structure and supplier relationships have adapted as software competency becomes as important as mechanical know-how. Firms with embedded control expertise and strong software development practices are gaining influence, prompting traditional component suppliers to form closer partnerships or acquire capabilities. In addition, regulatory frameworks and harmonized testing protocols have tightened safety expectations, prompting manufacturers to prioritize validated system behavior under a broader set of operating conditions. Finally, user expectations around comfort, rideability, and electronic assistance have elevated ABS from a safety add-on to a core feature that shapes vehicle segmentation and marketing approaches. These combined shifts will continue to favor solutions that integrate sensing, control, and cross-domain coordination while remaining resilient to supply-chain and policy headwinds.
Assessing the layered effects of 2025 United States tariff actions on sourcing choices, design modularity, and supply resilience across motorcycle ABS value chains
The imposition of tariffs in the United States in 2025 has produced layered effects across the motorcycle ABS ecosystem, influencing sourcing decisions, product architecture, and risk management approaches. At the component level, increased duties on imported parts elevated landed costs for assembly operations that relied on cross-border sourcing of electronic modules, IMU sensors, and specialized hydraulic components. As a result, original equipment manufacturers reassessed global bill-of-material strategies and accelerated conversations about component localization and dual-sourcing to stabilize production economics.
Supply chain responses extended beyond simple supplier replacement. Engineering teams re-evaluated modularity and the localization-readiness of control units, prioritizing designs that could accommodate multiple sensor vendors and regional component variations with minimal validation overhead. Procurement organizations increased emphasis on long-term contracts and supplier performance clauses to mitigate volatility. Simultaneously, some manufacturers explored nearshoring options to reduce tariff exposure and compress lead times, while others adjusted end-customer pricing structures where market tolerances permitted. In the longer term, these adjustments fostered a clearer separation between tactical responses to trade policy and strategic investments in resilient architectures that preserve product functionality despite varying input origins.
Deep segmentation analysis explaining how technology types, brake architectures, and motorcycle categories interact to determine engineering priorities and commercial positioning
Segmentation insight requires careful attention to how technology pathways, brake architectures, and vehicle classes interact to shape development priorities and commercial positioning. Based on Technology, the competitive landscape spans Conventional ABS, Cornering ABS, and Cornering With Integrated Control, with cornering solutions subdivided into 6 Axis ABS and IMU Based ABS. Conventional ABS continues to serve cost-sensitive segments and legacy platforms where proven slip mitigation meets regulatory thresholds, while Cornering ABS targets performance and rider confidence in dynamic situations and benefits from richer inertial datasets. The 6 Axis and IMU-based approaches each present distinct integration challenges: the former emphasizes multi-sensor mechanical coordination, and the latter centers on sensor fusion algorithms and calibration fidelity.
Based on Brake Type, classification across Combined, Three Channel, and Two Channel architectures influences both packaging and fault-tolerance strategies. Combined braking systems can simplify rider interactions and support electronic distribution, whereas three-channel and two-channel layouts present differing trade-offs in redundancy, cost, and mechanical complexity. These trade-offs manifest in validation scopes and aftermarket servicing considerations. Based on Motorcycle Type, differentiation spans Cruiser, Off Road, Sport, Standard, and Touring, with Sport further split into Adventure Sport and Supersport variants. Cruiser and Touring applications emphasize comfort, stability, and long-duration reliability, whereas Off Road and Sport variants demand aggressive dynamic control and ruggedization. Within Sport, Adventure Sport platforms favor broader operating envelopes and multi-terrain adaptability while Supersport platforms prioritize compact mass, rapid response, and thermal management under high-performance conditions. Each segmentation axis therefore drives distinct engineering priorities, aftermarket strategies, and certification pathways that suppliers and OEMs must reconcile when proposing scalable ABS solutions.
Regional dynamics and regulatory variations shaping ABS technology adoption, supply localization, certification priorities, and aftermarket support across major global markets
Regional dynamics continue to condition strategic choices across the ABS ecosystem, with clear differentiation across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific in terms of regulation, manufacturing footprint, and consumer expectations. In the Americas, regulatory frameworks and consumer safety campaigns encourage broad adoption of ABS features across passenger motorcycle classes, while regional manufacturing bases favor suppliers that can provide integrated modules with consistent quality and aftermarket support. The Americas also exhibit a mix of premium and value-oriented segments, which shapes product positioning for both OEMs and Tier suppliers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous environment with stringent homologation processes in several jurisdictions and high expectations for functional safety and documentation. This region emphasizes certification, diagnostics, and serviceability, creating demand for systems that can demonstrate robustness in testing and predictable in-service behavior. In contrast, Asia-Pacific is characterized by diverse adoption curves and a concentrated manufacturing ecosystem. High-volume production and strong OEM presences in certain countries encourage cost-optimized solutions, while rapid technological adoption in other markets has driven early uptake of advanced cornering features. Across regions, localization of supply, regulatory alignment, and aftersales network readiness remain decisive factors for successful ABS deployment and support.
Corporate strategies and competitive moves showing why software-led capabilities, sensor partnerships, and supply resilience are decisive differentiators for ABS suppliers
Leading companies in the ABS domain are aligning their strategic plays around software competence, sensor partnerships, and platform modularity to capture value beyond hardware. Suppliers that combine mechanical braking expertise with embedded control teams can offer differentiated integration packages, accelerating adoption by OEMs that seek single-source responsibility for system behavior. Meanwhile, firms that invest in robust calibration toolchains and model-based development shorten validation cycles and facilitate multi-variant deployments across motorcycle platforms.
Commercially, strategic partnerships and selective acquisitions have emerged as effective levers to access niche capabilities such as high-performance IMUs, functional safety toolchains, and over-the-air update infrastructures. At the same time, aftersales capabilities and diagnostic ecosystems provide service revenue opportunities and strengthen customer lock-in. Companies that maintain transparent component roadmaps and open integration APIs reduce validation friction for OEMs and increase their attractiveness as long-term partners. Equally important is operational resilience; firms that have diversified supplier networks, dual-sourcing plans for critical semiconductors, and geographically distributed manufacturing can better absorb shocks from policy shifts and component shortages. Collectively, these company-level moves indicate a competitive environment where multidisciplinary capability sets and supply-chain robustness determine commercial momentum.
Actionable strategic and tactical recommendations for OEMs and suppliers to accelerate ABS innovation, secure supply chains, and optimize commercialization across global programs
Industry leaders should adopt a coordinated set of actions that marry product innovation with supply-chain resilience and go-to-market clarity. First, prioritize modular architectures that let control units accept multiple sensor inputs and allow incremental feature upgrades without complete hardware redesign. This approach reduces validation cycles and enables localized sourcing choices without fragmenting the product line. Second, invest in embedded software and calibration platforms, because algorithmic differentiation for IMU-based cornering solutions will determine performance perception and liability management. These investments should be accompanied by rigorous functional safety processes and continuous integration practices to shorten time-to-certification.
Third, pursue diversified sourcing strategies that mix global suppliers, regional specialists, and qualified secondary vendors to lower trade-policy exposure while maintaining quality. Fourth, strengthen aftermarket and diagnostic frameworks to capture service revenue and ensure consistent in-service performance; remote diagnostics and calibrated replacement strategies improve uptime and customer satisfaction. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and standards bodies to shape test protocols and ensure early alignment on new safety expectations. Finally, align commercial models to accommodate both OEM program requirements and retrofit opportunities, offering tiered product variants that reflect differing cost and performance thresholds across motorcycle categories.
An integrated mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, technical verification, supplier mapping, and standards analysis to inform validated ABS insights
The research adopts a mixed-methods approach that integrates primary expert input, technical review, and structured supply-chain analysis to produce robust, actionable findings. Primary data was gathered through confidential interviews and workshops with product managers, systems engineers, and procurement leads across OEMs and tiered suppliers, allowing for triangulation of engineering priorities and commercial constraints. This qualitative work was complemented by technical assessments of sensor modalities, control architectures, and verification regimes to evaluate how different implementations perform under constrained and extreme conditions.
In parallel, a detailed supplier-mapping exercise analyzed component provenance, assembly footprints, and certification histories to identify resilience vectors and potential bottlenecks. Patent landscape reviews and standards analysis provided insight into emerging functional safety patterns and software architectures, while trade and regulatory documentation informed the assessment of policy impacts and compliance requirements. Findings were validated through iterative peer review with industry experts to ensure that conclusions reflect practical realities and not solely theoretical constructs. The methodology emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and a clear line-of-sight from evidence to recommendation to support confident decision-making.
Concluding synthesis emphasizing the convergence of software-defined control, modular hardware, and supply-chain resilience as the defining priorities for ABS competitiveness
In conclusion, the motorcycle ABS space stands at a pivotal intersection of mechanical engineering and software-defined control, shaped by regulatory pressures, consumer expectations, and evolving trade dynamics. Advanced cornering capabilities and IMU-driven control systems represent the technological frontier, while brake architecture choices and vehicle segmentation continue to influence practical engineering trade-offs. Supply-chain resilience, driven by diversified sourcing and modular design strategies, proves essential to absorb geopolitical and policy shocks without sacrificing product integrity.
Companies that align product roadmaps with software capability development, robust calibration infrastructure, and proactive regulatory engagement will be best placed to convert technological advantage into commercial success. As stakeholders evaluate investments, they should emphasize architectures and partnerships that permit adaptability across regions and vehicle classes, and they should treat functional safety and aftersales diagnostics as core strategic assets rather than compliance costs. The path forward is one of integrated capability building: pairing mechanical excellence with software depth and supply-chain foresight to deliver ABS solutions that meet both performance expectations and real-world operational demands.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Growing implementation of cornering ABS systems for enhanced rider safety during leaned turns
- 5.2. Emergence of predictive ABS algorithms using AI and real-time road condition data to prevent skidding
- 5.3. Development of modular ABS units compatible with electric motorcycles to optimize regenerative braking efficiency
- 5.4. Increasing collaboration between motorcycle manufacturers and semiconductor suppliers for lightweight ABS hardware design
- 5.5. Adoption of smartphone-connected ABS diagnostics platforms for over-the-air firmware updates and troubleshooting
- 5.6. Expansion of dual-channel ABS technologies in mid-range motorcycles to meet evolving safety regulations in key markets
- 5.7. Integration of inertial measurement units with ABS for enhanced dynamic stability control on adventure and off-road bikes
- 5.8. Investment in low-cost ABS solutions for entry-level motorcycle segments in Southeast Asia and Latin America markets
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Brake Type
- 8.1. Combined
- 8.2. Three Channel
- 8.3. Two Channel
- 9. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Conventional ABS
- 9.2. Cornering ABS
- 9.2.1. 6 Axis ABS
- 9.2.2. IMU Based ABS
- 9.3. Cornering With Integrated Control
- 10. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Motorcycle Type
- 10.1. Cruiser
- 10.2. Off Road
- 10.3. Sport
- 10.3.1. Adventure Sport
- 10.3.2. Supersport
- 10.4. Standard
- 10.5. Touring
- 11. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by End‑Use
- 11.1. Front‑Loading
- 11.2. After‑Loading
- 11.3. Commercial Use
- 11.4. Personal Use
- 12. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. OEM
- 12.2. Aftermarket
- 13. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Motorcycle Anti-Lock Braking Systems Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 16.3.2. Continental AG
- 16.3.3. ZF Friedrichshafen AG
- 16.3.4. Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.5. Brembo S.p.A.
- 16.3.6. J.Juan N.A. S.L.
- 16.3.7. Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.
- 16.3.8. Showa Corporation
- 16.3.9. Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
- 16.3.10. KYB Corporation
- 16.3.11. Shimano Inc.
- 16.3.12. dSPACE GmbH
- 16.3.13. Panasonic Holdings Corporation
- 16.3.14. HL Mando Corp.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
