Modular Trailer Market by Type (Double Drop Trailer, Extendable Flatbed Trailer, Removable Gooseneck Trailer), Capacity (20–40 Tons, 40–60 Tons, Above 60 Tons), Axle Configuration, Application, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Modular Trailer Market was valued at USD 7.54 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.99 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.97%, reaching USD 12.94 billion by 2032.
An incisive overview that frames modular trailer evolution with pragmatic context for procurement, fleet operations, and engineering decision-makers
The modular trailer segment is undergoing a period of strategic redefinition as fleets, project contractors, and logistics planners respond to increasingly complex load profiles and tighter operational windows. Across construction yards, energy project sites, and heavy industrial corridors, demand signals favor adaptable platforms that can be configured for diverse payloads while minimizing setup time and permitting complexity. In this context, stakeholders prioritize designs that balance transport efficiency with on-site deployability and regulatory compliance.
Consequently, manufacturers are investing in engineering flexibility, modular interface standards, and aftermarket service models that reduce downtime and lifecycle cost. This report opens with an introduction that frames why modularity-rather than single-purpose specialization-is emerging as the primary differentiator. It then outlines the practical implications for procurement teams, rental fleets, and OEMs, highlighting the operational levers that convert technical capability into measurable performance improvements. As readers move from overview to deep-dive analysis, they will find the introductory section establishes the baseline assumptions and terminologies used throughout the study, enabling consistent interpretation of subsequent insights and recommendations.
How technological advances, regulatory alignment, and commercial model innovation are remaking competitive dynamics and procurement priorities in modular trailers
The landscape for modular trailers is shifting due to a confluence of technological, regulatory, and commercial forces that are reshaping competitive advantage. First, rapid advances in materials science and finite element design allow lighter, stronger deck assemblies and subframes, which in turn lower gross combination weights while preserving payload capability. Second, telematics and IoT-enabled asset tracking have moved from optional to essential, facilitating predictive maintenance and optimized routing for oversize and overweight movements. Third, regulatory frameworks across major jurisdictions are harmonizing certain permitting and axle-load paradigms, even as local variances persist; this dual trend incentivizes manufacturers to offer modular compliance kits that simplify cross-border operations.
Moreover, buyer behavior is evolving: project owners increasingly favor rental and managed services over outright purchase for episodic needs, prompting OEMs and rental houses to develop flexible commercial models. Meanwhile, supply chain resilience considerations prompt designers to standardize interfaces and components to reduce lead times and enable faster retrofit of specialized modules. Taken together, these transformative shifts favor suppliers and operators who can combine engineering adaptability, data-driven service offerings, and commercially flexible arrangements to meet the next wave of complex heavy-haul requirements.
Assessing the ripple effects of 2025 tariff realignments on supply chains, sourcing strategies, and product roadmaps for modular trailer manufacturers and operators
Tariff adjustments implemented in 2025 introduced new friction points across cross-border procurement, component sourcing, and lifecycle servicing of modular trailers. The immediate operational consequence has been an increased incentive to localize critical manufacturing steps and to reevaluate sourcing strategies for steel, hydraulic systems, and electrical controls. In turn, many OEMs and OEM suppliers have accelerated regional supplier qualification programs and invested in multiple-sourcing strategies to mitigate single-origin exposure.
Beyond procurement, tariffs have affected product roadmaps and aftermarket economics. For example, where import duties raised the landed cost of specific modular subsystems, manufacturers prioritized design alterations that substitute higher-cost imported inputs with locally available alternatives or reengineered assemblies that require fewer proprietary parts. Concurrently, service networks have adapted by expanding parts inventory and bolstering in-region fabrication capacity to preserve uptime and shorten lead times. Looking forward, tariff-driven dynamics will continue to favor firms that can flex production footprints, maintain engineering commonality across platforms, and implement commercial terms that shield customers from abrupt input-cost volatility through strategic warranties, service agreements, and localized fulfillment.
Segment-level intelligence revealing how product typologies, specialized applications, capacity tiers, axle configurations, and distribution channels shape demand and design priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals where innovation and demand intensity are concentrated, and it guides targeted product development, marketing, and channel strategies. By type, opportunities differ between Double Drop Trailer, Extendable Flatbed Trailer, Removable Gooseneck Trailer, Step Deck Trailer, and Stretch Trailer configurations, with each architecture serving distinct loading envelopes and maneuvering characteristics that appeal to different operator profiles. Transitioning to application lenses, needs vary markedly across Construction Equipment Transport, Energy Sector Deliveries, Industrial Machinery Haulage, Infrastructure Module Movement, and Military Oversized Load projects, where duty cycles, regulatory clearances, and on-site handling requirements drive specification choices.
Capacity tiers-20–40 Tons, 40–60 Tons, and Above 60 Tons-create discrete engineering and commercial trade-offs around structural reinforcement, braking systems, and permit regimes. Similarly, axle configuration options such as Multi Axle, Quad Axle, Single Axle, Tandem Axle, and Tri Axle determine load distribution, route feasibility, and pavement impact, influencing both total cost of ownership and route planning complexity. Finally, distribution channel dynamics split between Offline and Online Platforms, with Offline further broken down into Direct Sales and Original Equipment Manufacturer channels; this dichotomy affects buying cycles, customization expectations, and aftermarket engagement models. Synthesizing these segmentation layers uncovers nuanced value pools and highlights where modular design, configurable options, and tailored service contracts can command premium positioning.
Regional strategic imperatives that determine product configuration, service models, and go-to-market execution across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific landscapes
Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping product features, regulatory compliance design, and commercial approaches across the modular trailer landscape. In the Americas, project-driven investments and a dense network of heavy-haul corridors yield steady demand for high-capacity, quickly deployable platforms, with particular emphasis on regional service networks and strong aftermarket support. Conversely, in Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and diverse route infrastructure drive demand for customization, axle configurations that optimize pavement impact, and adaptive permitting solutions that simplify transnational movements.
Asia-Pacific presents a varied picture where rapid industrialization, large-scale energy and infrastructure programs, and varying road-weight regulations create both high-volume opportunities and demand for locally adapted designs. Across these regions, differences in procurement norms, financing availability, and preferred commercial models require manufacturers and service providers to align product portfolios and go-to-market strategies with local operating realities. Consequently, successful regional plays combine technical adaptability, localized service presence, and flexible commercial terms to navigate regulatory variability and deliver reliable project outcomes.
How integrated product engineering, supplier ecosystems, rental operators, and telematics providers converge to create differentiated competitive advantage in modular trailers
Competitive dynamics in the modular trailer sector are shaped by the interplay of specialized OEMs, component suppliers, rental and service operators, and systems integrators that provide telematics and control systems. Leading manufacturers differentiate through engineering depth, modular interface standards, and the ability to deliver reliable aftermarket networks that ensure uptime for mission-critical moves. Component suppliers specializing in axles, suspension systems, hydraulic rams, and electronic braking systems are increasingly strategic partners, as their innovations directly influence payload efficiency and regulatory compliance.
Furthermore, rental and managed-service providers have emerged as influential actors by offering bundled solutions that combine equipment, operator expertise, and permitting support, thereby reducing project risk for end users. Strategic partnerships between OEMs and these service providers enable faster adoption of new trailer architectures while spreading capital expenditure. In addition, systems integrators that offer telematics, load monitoring, and preventive maintenance platforms are driving a shift toward performance-based contracting. Taken together, competitive advantage accrues to organizations that integrate product engineering, robust supplier ecosystems, and value-added services into coherent commercial propositions that align with customer operational priorities.
Practical, high-impact actions for OEMs, suppliers, and service providers to enhance resilience, accelerate adoption, and capture higher lifecycle value in modular trailers
Industry leaders should pursue a focused set of actions that convert emerging trends into sustainable advantage while mitigating structural risks. First, prioritize modular engineering platforms that enable rapid configuration across Double Drop Trailer, Extendable Flatbed Trailer, Removable Gooseneck Trailer, Step Deck Trailer, and Stretch Trailer variants, thereby reducing lead times and enhancing resale value. Next, expand regional manufacturing and assembly touchpoints to absorb tariff volatility and shorten parts replenishment cycles, while preserving core engineering commonality to protect design investments.
Simultaneously, invest in integrated telematics and asset management capabilities to shift customers from reactive to predictive maintenance, lowering total life-cycle cost and creating recurring revenue through managed-service offerings. Strengthen partnerships with axle and suspension suppliers to co-develop lighter, more durable assemblies suitable for 20–40 Tons, 40–60 Tons, and Above 60 Tons segments, and standardize mounting interfaces across Multi Axle, Quad Axle, Single Axle, Tandem Axle, and Tri Axle configurations to simplify conversions and repairs. Finally, tailor channel strategies to regional buying behaviors by balancing Offline routes such as Direct Sales and OEM channels with Online platforms that facilitate specification, quoting, and aftermarket support. Implementing these recommendations will enhance resilience, accelerate adoption, and improve margin capture across market cycles.
A rigorous, multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical product analysis, and policy contextualization to ensure robust and actionable findings
This study synthesizes primary interviews with industry practitioners, technical reviews of current product architectures, and secondary analysis of regulatory frameworks and trade policy changes to build a multi-dimensional view of the modular trailer landscape. Primary sources include procurement leads at large infrastructure contractors, fleet managers at rental operators, and engineering teams at trailer manufacturers, providing qualitative insights into specification drivers, maintenance priorities, and commercial preferences. Secondary inputs encompass publicly available regulatory documents, industry standards, and manufacturer technical literature, which together support consistency checks and contextualization of observed trends.
Analytical approaches integrate comparative product feature mapping, supplier ecosystem analysis, and scenario-based impact assessment for policy and tariff variables. Where applicable, the methodology applies engineering-informed evaluation criteria to assess design trade-offs such as strength-to-weight optimization, axle-load distribution, and modular interface complexity. Throughout, the research emphasizes triangulation across data sources to ensure robust findings and includes sensitivity checks to account for regional regulatory variability and evolving buyer preferences. This combination of qualitative depth and technical rigor underpins the report’s actionable insights and strategic recommendations.
A strategic synthesis showing why modular design, localized capability, and service-led commercial models are the defining factors for future success in heavy-haul logistics
In conclusion, the modular trailer sector stands at an inflection point where engineering innovation, commercial model flexibility, and regional supply chain resilience will determine winners and laggards. Modularity is no longer a niche proposition; it is a strategic imperative that reduces operational friction for heavy-haul projects while enabling faster response to evolving application needs. Firms that integrate modular design principles with localized production capacity, telematics-driven service models, and flexible distribution approaches will be best positioned to capture durable value.
Looking ahead, the ability to translate technical capability into compelling commercial propositions-rental bundles, performance-based contracts, and simplified compliance packages-will accelerate adoption across construction, energy, industrial, infrastructure, and defense sectors. Executives should therefore prioritize cross-functional programs that align product development, commercial policy, and aftermarket operations to ensure their organizations can respond rapidly to both project-driven demand and systemic shifts in trade and regulation. By doing so, they will create resilient businesses capable of meeting the complex demands of modern heavy-haul logistics.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An incisive overview that frames modular trailer evolution with pragmatic context for procurement, fleet operations, and engineering decision-makers
The modular trailer segment is undergoing a period of strategic redefinition as fleets, project contractors, and logistics planners respond to increasingly complex load profiles and tighter operational windows. Across construction yards, energy project sites, and heavy industrial corridors, demand signals favor adaptable platforms that can be configured for diverse payloads while minimizing setup time and permitting complexity. In this context, stakeholders prioritize designs that balance transport efficiency with on-site deployability and regulatory compliance.
Consequently, manufacturers are investing in engineering flexibility, modular interface standards, and aftermarket service models that reduce downtime and lifecycle cost. This report opens with an introduction that frames why modularity-rather than single-purpose specialization-is emerging as the primary differentiator. It then outlines the practical implications for procurement teams, rental fleets, and OEMs, highlighting the operational levers that convert technical capability into measurable performance improvements. As readers move from overview to deep-dive analysis, they will find the introductory section establishes the baseline assumptions and terminologies used throughout the study, enabling consistent interpretation of subsequent insights and recommendations.
How technological advances, regulatory alignment, and commercial model innovation are remaking competitive dynamics and procurement priorities in modular trailers
The landscape for modular trailers is shifting due to a confluence of technological, regulatory, and commercial forces that are reshaping competitive advantage. First, rapid advances in materials science and finite element design allow lighter, stronger deck assemblies and subframes, which in turn lower gross combination weights while preserving payload capability. Second, telematics and IoT-enabled asset tracking have moved from optional to essential, facilitating predictive maintenance and optimized routing for oversize and overweight movements. Third, regulatory frameworks across major jurisdictions are harmonizing certain permitting and axle-load paradigms, even as local variances persist; this dual trend incentivizes manufacturers to offer modular compliance kits that simplify cross-border operations.
Moreover, buyer behavior is evolving: project owners increasingly favor rental and managed services over outright purchase for episodic needs, prompting OEMs and rental houses to develop flexible commercial models. Meanwhile, supply chain resilience considerations prompt designers to standardize interfaces and components to reduce lead times and enable faster retrofit of specialized modules. Taken together, these transformative shifts favor suppliers and operators who can combine engineering adaptability, data-driven service offerings, and commercially flexible arrangements to meet the next wave of complex heavy-haul requirements.
Assessing the ripple effects of 2025 tariff realignments on supply chains, sourcing strategies, and product roadmaps for modular trailer manufacturers and operators
Tariff adjustments implemented in 2025 introduced new friction points across cross-border procurement, component sourcing, and lifecycle servicing of modular trailers. The immediate operational consequence has been an increased incentive to localize critical manufacturing steps and to reevaluate sourcing strategies for steel, hydraulic systems, and electrical controls. In turn, many OEMs and OEM suppliers have accelerated regional supplier qualification programs and invested in multiple-sourcing strategies to mitigate single-origin exposure.
Beyond procurement, tariffs have affected product roadmaps and aftermarket economics. For example, where import duties raised the landed cost of specific modular subsystems, manufacturers prioritized design alterations that substitute higher-cost imported inputs with locally available alternatives or reengineered assemblies that require fewer proprietary parts. Concurrently, service networks have adapted by expanding parts inventory and bolstering in-region fabrication capacity to preserve uptime and shorten lead times. Looking forward, tariff-driven dynamics will continue to favor firms that can flex production footprints, maintain engineering commonality across platforms, and implement commercial terms that shield customers from abrupt input-cost volatility through strategic warranties, service agreements, and localized fulfillment.
Segment-level intelligence revealing how product typologies, specialized applications, capacity tiers, axle configurations, and distribution channels shape demand and design priorities
Segmentation analysis reveals where innovation and demand intensity are concentrated, and it guides targeted product development, marketing, and channel strategies. By type, opportunities differ between Double Drop Trailer, Extendable Flatbed Trailer, Removable Gooseneck Trailer, Step Deck Trailer, and Stretch Trailer configurations, with each architecture serving distinct loading envelopes and maneuvering characteristics that appeal to different operator profiles. Transitioning to application lenses, needs vary markedly across Construction Equipment Transport, Energy Sector Deliveries, Industrial Machinery Haulage, Infrastructure Module Movement, and Military Oversized Load projects, where duty cycles, regulatory clearances, and on-site handling requirements drive specification choices.
Capacity tiers-20–40 Tons, 40–60 Tons, and Above 60 Tons-create discrete engineering and commercial trade-offs around structural reinforcement, braking systems, and permit regimes. Similarly, axle configuration options such as Multi Axle, Quad Axle, Single Axle, Tandem Axle, and Tri Axle determine load distribution, route feasibility, and pavement impact, influencing both total cost of ownership and route planning complexity. Finally, distribution channel dynamics split between Offline and Online Platforms, with Offline further broken down into Direct Sales and Original Equipment Manufacturer channels; this dichotomy affects buying cycles, customization expectations, and aftermarket engagement models. Synthesizing these segmentation layers uncovers nuanced value pools and highlights where modular design, configurable options, and tailored service contracts can command premium positioning.
Regional strategic imperatives that determine product configuration, service models, and go-to-market execution across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific landscapes
Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping product features, regulatory compliance design, and commercial approaches across the modular trailer landscape. In the Americas, project-driven investments and a dense network of heavy-haul corridors yield steady demand for high-capacity, quickly deployable platforms, with particular emphasis on regional service networks and strong aftermarket support. Conversely, in Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and diverse route infrastructure drive demand for customization, axle configurations that optimize pavement impact, and adaptive permitting solutions that simplify transnational movements.
Asia-Pacific presents a varied picture where rapid industrialization, large-scale energy and infrastructure programs, and varying road-weight regulations create both high-volume opportunities and demand for locally adapted designs. Across these regions, differences in procurement norms, financing availability, and preferred commercial models require manufacturers and service providers to align product portfolios and go-to-market strategies with local operating realities. Consequently, successful regional plays combine technical adaptability, localized service presence, and flexible commercial terms to navigate regulatory variability and deliver reliable project outcomes.
How integrated product engineering, supplier ecosystems, rental operators, and telematics providers converge to create differentiated competitive advantage in modular trailers
Competitive dynamics in the modular trailer sector are shaped by the interplay of specialized OEMs, component suppliers, rental and service operators, and systems integrators that provide telematics and control systems. Leading manufacturers differentiate through engineering depth, modular interface standards, and the ability to deliver reliable aftermarket networks that ensure uptime for mission-critical moves. Component suppliers specializing in axles, suspension systems, hydraulic rams, and electronic braking systems are increasingly strategic partners, as their innovations directly influence payload efficiency and regulatory compliance.
Furthermore, rental and managed-service providers have emerged as influential actors by offering bundled solutions that combine equipment, operator expertise, and permitting support, thereby reducing project risk for end users. Strategic partnerships between OEMs and these service providers enable faster adoption of new trailer architectures while spreading capital expenditure. In addition, systems integrators that offer telematics, load monitoring, and preventive maintenance platforms are driving a shift toward performance-based contracting. Taken together, competitive advantage accrues to organizations that integrate product engineering, robust supplier ecosystems, and value-added services into coherent commercial propositions that align with customer operational priorities.
Practical, high-impact actions for OEMs, suppliers, and service providers to enhance resilience, accelerate adoption, and capture higher lifecycle value in modular trailers
Industry leaders should pursue a focused set of actions that convert emerging trends into sustainable advantage while mitigating structural risks. First, prioritize modular engineering platforms that enable rapid configuration across Double Drop Trailer, Extendable Flatbed Trailer, Removable Gooseneck Trailer, Step Deck Trailer, and Stretch Trailer variants, thereby reducing lead times and enhancing resale value. Next, expand regional manufacturing and assembly touchpoints to absorb tariff volatility and shorten parts replenishment cycles, while preserving core engineering commonality to protect design investments.
Simultaneously, invest in integrated telematics and asset management capabilities to shift customers from reactive to predictive maintenance, lowering total life-cycle cost and creating recurring revenue through managed-service offerings. Strengthen partnerships with axle and suspension suppliers to co-develop lighter, more durable assemblies suitable for 20–40 Tons, 40–60 Tons, and Above 60 Tons segments, and standardize mounting interfaces across Multi Axle, Quad Axle, Single Axle, Tandem Axle, and Tri Axle configurations to simplify conversions and repairs. Finally, tailor channel strategies to regional buying behaviors by balancing Offline routes such as Direct Sales and OEM channels with Online platforms that facilitate specification, quoting, and aftermarket support. Implementing these recommendations will enhance resilience, accelerate adoption, and improve margin capture across market cycles.
A rigorous, multi-method research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical product analysis, and policy contextualization to ensure robust and actionable findings
This study synthesizes primary interviews with industry practitioners, technical reviews of current product architectures, and secondary analysis of regulatory frameworks and trade policy changes to build a multi-dimensional view of the modular trailer landscape. Primary sources include procurement leads at large infrastructure contractors, fleet managers at rental operators, and engineering teams at trailer manufacturers, providing qualitative insights into specification drivers, maintenance priorities, and commercial preferences. Secondary inputs encompass publicly available regulatory documents, industry standards, and manufacturer technical literature, which together support consistency checks and contextualization of observed trends.
Analytical approaches integrate comparative product feature mapping, supplier ecosystem analysis, and scenario-based impact assessment for policy and tariff variables. Where applicable, the methodology applies engineering-informed evaluation criteria to assess design trade-offs such as strength-to-weight optimization, axle-load distribution, and modular interface complexity. Throughout, the research emphasizes triangulation across data sources to ensure robust findings and includes sensitivity checks to account for regional regulatory variability and evolving buyer preferences. This combination of qualitative depth and technical rigor underpins the report’s actionable insights and strategic recommendations.
A strategic synthesis showing why modular design, localized capability, and service-led commercial models are the defining factors for future success in heavy-haul logistics
In conclusion, the modular trailer sector stands at an inflection point where engineering innovation, commercial model flexibility, and regional supply chain resilience will determine winners and laggards. Modularity is no longer a niche proposition; it is a strategic imperative that reduces operational friction for heavy-haul projects while enabling faster response to evolving application needs. Firms that integrate modular design principles with localized production capacity, telematics-driven service models, and flexible distribution approaches will be best positioned to capture durable value.
Looking ahead, the ability to translate technical capability into compelling commercial propositions-rental bundles, performance-based contracts, and simplified compliance packages-will accelerate adoption across construction, energy, industrial, infrastructure, and defense sectors. Executives should therefore prioritize cross-functional programs that align product development, commercial policy, and aftermarket operations to ensure their organizations can respond rapidly to both project-driven demand and systemic shifts in trade and regulation. By doing so, they will create resilient businesses capable of meeting the complex demands of modern heavy-haul logistics.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rising adoption of lightweight composite materials to enhance fuel efficiency in modular trailers
- 5.2. Integration of advanced telematics systems for real-time monitoring of modular trailer performance and location
- 5.3. Growing preference for customizable intermodal drop deck trailers to optimize logistics flexibility
- 5.4. Emergence of electric refrigeration units reducing carbon footprint in temperature-controlled modular transport
- 5.5. Development of modular trailer platforms with autonomous driving capabilities for improved supply chain automation
- 5.6. Increasing investment in modular platform trailers designed for rapid deployment in disaster relief operations
- 5.7. Shift towards sustainable manufacturing processes incorporating recycled steel and bio-based composites in trailer frames
- 5.8. Expansion of aftermarket service networks offering IoT-enabled predictive maintenance for modular trailer fleets
- 5.9. Surge in demand for specialty modular equipment trailers tailored for renewable energy project logistics
- 5.10. Implementation of augmented reality tools for virtual configuration and planning of modular trailer assemblies
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Modular Trailer Market, by Type
- 8.1. Double Drop Trailer
- 8.2. Extendable Flatbed Trailer
- 8.3. Removable Gooseneck Trailer
- 8.4. Step Deck Trailer
- 8.5. Stretch Trailer
- 9. Modular Trailer Market, by Capacity
- 9.1. 20–40 Tons
- 9.2. 40–60 Tons
- 9.3. Above 60 Tons
- 10. Modular Trailer Market, by Axle Configuration
- 10.1. Multi Axle
- 10.2. Quad Axle
- 10.3. Single Axle
- 10.4. Tandem Axle
- 10.5. Tri Axle
- 11. Modular Trailer Market, by Application
- 11.1. Construction Equipment Transport
- 11.2. Energy Sector Deliveries
- 11.3. Industrial Machinery Haulage
- 11.4. Infrastructure Module Movement
- 11.5. Military Oversized Load
- 12. Modular Trailer Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Offline
- 12.1.1. Direct Sales
- 12.1.2. Original Equipment Manufacturer
- 12.2. Online Platforms
- 13. Modular Trailer Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Modular Trailer Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Modular Trailer Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Goldhofer Aktiengesellschaft
- 16.3.2. Transporter Industry International GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.3. Faymonville Group GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.4. Nooteboom Trailers B.V.
- 16.3.5. Broshuis B.V.
- 16.3.6. Tianjin CIMC Special Vehicles Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Taylor Machine Works, Ltd.
- 16.3.8. Felling Trailers, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Phoenix Products Company
- 16.3.10. Kögel Trailer GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.3.11. SCHEUERLE Fahrzeugfabrik GmbH
- 16.3.12. Rogers Brothers Corporation
- 16.3.13. Manac Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
