Mobile Identity Management Market by Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small And Medium Enterprises), Component (Services, Solution), Deployment Mode, Authentication Method, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Mobile Identity Management Market was valued at USD 10.00 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 11.16 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 11.86%, reaching USD 24.52 billion by 2032.
Framing the strategic importance of mobile identity management as a cross-functional foundation for secure digital experiences and operational resilience
Mobile identity management has transitioned from a niche security discipline into a foundational capability for modern digital business. As enterprises expand mobile-first customer experiences and remote work models, identity functions are evolving beyond simple credential stores into ecosystems that connect devices, applications, and users through contextual authentication, continuous risk assessment, and privacy-preserving verification methods. This shift compels security, IT, and product leaders to re-evaluate legacy approaches and to prioritize identity as a horizontal control that underpins customer trust and regulatory compliance.
Consequently, organizations are adopting architecture patterns that emphasize interoperability, standards-based protocols, and modular services that can scale with changing requirements. Technology vendors are responding with richer solutions that bundle biometric modalities, cloud-native identity orchestration, and lifecycle management. Meanwhile, the interplay between user experience and security posture has never been more critical; friction must be minimized without compromising assurance levels. In this section, the focus is on establishing the strategic context for why identity must be treated as a core competence, highlighting the operational, regulatory, and experience-driven imperatives that guide investment and governance decisions across public and private sector organizations.
How advances in biometrics, cryptography, cloud-native orchestration, and privacy expectations are redefining identity strategies for mobile-first enterprises
The landscape for mobile identity management is being reshaped by a series of transformative shifts that affect technology selection, operational models, and risk calculus. Advances in biometric capture and on-device processing are enabling higher assurance authentication with reduced latency, while advances in cryptographic techniques, such as privacy-preserving authentication and decentralized identifiers, are expanding options for user-centric identity models. At the same time, cloud-native architectures and identity orchestration platforms are making it easier to integrate heterogeneous authentication methods and to deliver consistent policy enforcement across digital touchpoints.
These technical changes are mirrored by operational shifts: security teams are moving from perimeter-centric defenses to adaptive, context-aware controls that consider device posture, behavioral signals, location, and transaction risk. Regulatory developments are accelerating adoption of stronger authentication in sensitive verticals, and privacy expectations are driving demand for solutions that minimize data exposure and support consented data flows. Taken together, these dynamics press organizations to adopt modular, standards-conscious approaches and to prioritize vendor ecosystems that can support rapid composability, measurable assurance, and clear auditability across a diverse set of mobile and connected use cases.
Assessing the operational and procurement impacts of the 2025 United States tariff measures on hardware-dependent identity solutions and supplier strategies
The introduction of new tariff regimes and trade adjustments in the United States for 2025 introduces practical considerations for procurement, supply chain continuity, and vendor sourcing in the mobile identity ecosystem. Hardware components, certain embedded security modules, and cross-border service arrangements can be directly affected by changing duties and import rules, which in turn influence total cost of ownership calculations, vendor selection, and risk assessments related to supplier concentration. Procurement and sourcing teams must therefore incorporate tariff sensitivity into vendor evaluations and contractual terms.
Beyond direct cost implications, the tariff environment can accelerate diversification of supply chains and spur interest in local manufacturing, assembly, and service delivery models that reduce exposure to customs volatility. For organizations with complex, multinational deployments, tariffs can also drive strategic shifts toward software-centric solutions or cloud-delivered services that decouple functionality from physical component flows. In response, identity program leaders should reassess vendor roadmaps, evaluate alternative supplier networks, and consider contractual protections that allocate tariff risk appropriately while preserving continuity of security and compliance capabilities.
Segment-specific realities revealing how organization scale, component makeup, deployment architecture, authentication modalities, and vertical drivers determine identity priorities
A nuanced understanding of segmentation informs where investment and competitive differentiation will matter most. When examining organization size, differentiation appears between Large Enterprises and Small And Medium Enterprises, with the latter further divided into Medium Enterprises and Small Enterprises; large organizations tend to prioritize integrated governance, scalability, and cross-border compliance, while medium and small entities emphasize simplified deployment, cost predictability, and vendor-managed services. Considering component segmentation, solutions are complemented by services where Integration And Consulting and Support And Maintenance play a pivotal role, and solution stacks combine Hardware and Software components, each requiring distinct procurement, lifecycle management, and support models.
Deployment mode segmentation-Cloud, Hybrid, and On-Premises-reveals differing risk profiles and operational requirements; Cloud deployments often offer faster feature delivery and managed updates, whereas On-Premises remains relevant for environments with stringent data residency constraints and legacy integration needs; Hybrid approaches enable phased migration. Authentication method segmentation highlights modality trade-offs: Biometric methods such as Facial Recognition, Fingerprint Recognition, Iris Recognition, and Voice Recognition provide varying trade-offs between user experience and assurance; Certificate-Based approaches support device attestation and machine-to-machine trust; One-Time Passcode variants including Email One-Time Passcode, Hardware Token, SMS One-Time Passcode, and Software Token serve as adaptable secondary factors; Push-Based flows balance convenience and transaction confirmation. Finally, industry vertical segmentation across Banking And Financial Services, Government And Defense, Healthcare, It And Telecom, and Retail And Ecommerce shapes regulatory drivers, acceptable risk thresholds, and integration priorities, with each vertical imposing unique identity lifecycle and auditability requirements.
How regional regulatory regimes, digital identity initiatives, and adoption patterns across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific dictate localization and deployment strategies
Regional dynamics materially affect vendor strategies, deployment preferences, and regulatory requirements. In the Americas, regulatory focus on consumer protection and strong interest in cloud-delivered services create fertile ground for innovations in biometric authentication and identity-as-a-service offerings, while procurement cycles and public sector contracting patterns influence adoption timing and vendor qualification processes. Conversely, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory regimes where data protection frameworks, cross-border data transfer rules, and national eID initiatives shape solution design and localization requirements; privacy-preserving features and strong consent models are often prerequisites for broad acceptance.
Asia-Pacific exhibits accelerated adoption curves in mobile-first services and widespread uptake of biometric modalities, driven by high mobile penetration and government-led digital identity initiatives. Localization, language support, and integration with regional payment and telematics ecosystems are practical considerations for vendor success in this region. Across all regions, interoperability with local identity infrastructures, compliance with sector-specific mandates, and the ability to deliver low-latency authentication for distributed user bases remain decisive factors for deployment success and long-term operational sustainability.
Competitive positioning and vendor differentiation driven by biometric innovation, integration ecosystems, managed services, and vertical-focused solutioning
Competitive dynamics in the mobile identity space are characterized by a blend of platform incumbents, specialized vendors, and systems integrators. Leading solution providers differentiate through investments in biometric modalities, seamless multi-factor orchestration, and developer-friendly APIs that reduce integration friction. At the same time, service partners that offer deep vertical expertise in areas like financial services, healthcare, and government are winning engagements that require tailored compliance workflows and complex legacy integrations. Partnerships and certification ecosystems have become strategic assets, enabling vendors to demonstrate interoperability with device manufacturers, cloud providers, and identity standards bodies.
Product roadmaps that emphasize privacy-preserving techniques, federated identity constructs, and strong lifecycle management are gaining executive attention as organizations seek to future-proof their architectures. Competitive advantage also accrues to firms that provide comprehensive support and managed services, allowing resource-constrained enterprises to adopt advanced authentication without the need for large in-house teams. In addition, vendors that can articulate clear outcomes-reduced fraud exposure, improved conversion in customer journeys, and streamlined compliance evidence-tend to secure larger, longer-duration engagements with enterprise and public-sector clients.
Practical strategic actions for executives to implement identity-first architecture, risk-based authentication, vendor resilience, and cross-functional governance
Leaders must act decisively to align identity strategy with broader business objectives, and immediate actions can generate measurable gains in security posture and user experience. Begin by adopting an identity-first architecture that separates authentication logic from application code, enabling consistent policies and easier vendor substitution. Parallel to architectural work, prioritize a risk-based authentication strategy that layers contextual signals and modality assurance to reduce unnecessary friction for low-risk interactions while escalating controls for sensitive operations.
Operationally, invest in vendor and supply chain resilience by mapping vendor dependencies, assessing tariff exposures, and establishing contingency sourcing plans for hardware and critical services. For organizations exploring biometric investments, run targeted pilots that validate performance across representative populations and environmental conditions to avoid biased outcomes and to quantify false acceptance and rejection implications. Finally, cultivate cross-functional governance that unites security, privacy, legal, and product stakeholders, ensuring that deployment choices align with regulatory obligations, consent frameworks, and business metrics. These measures together will position organizations to balance innovation with risk and to sustain user trust as mobile identity capabilities scale.
Comprehensive multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, technical validation, secondary analysis, and segmentation mapping to ensure pragmatic and reliable insights
The research synthesis underpinning these insights draws on a multi-method approach that balances primary interviews, technical validation, and secondary domain analysis to ensure robustness and practical relevance. Primary inputs include structured interviews with security architects, identity product leaders, and procurement specialists across enterprise and public-sector organizations, supplemented by technical briefings with vendor engineering teams. These conversations informed an understanding of real-world deployment constraints, integration patterns, and assurance trade-offs. Secondary analysis incorporated standards documents, regulatory guidance, and publicly available technical white papers to contextualize developments in biometric modalities, cryptographic techniques, and cloud orchestration.
To validate findings, technical proof points and reference implementations were reviewed, and cross-checked against vendor documentation and anonymized deployment case studies. The methodology also included a segmentation mapping exercise to ensure that recommendations and insights are aligned with organization size, component choices, deployment modes, authentication methods, and vertical requirements. Throughout, care was taken to identify potential biases and limitations, including variation in regional regulatory interpretation and rapid product evolution, which were mitigated through triangulation of sources and iterative expert review cycles.
Synthesis of why identity-as-a-platform is essential for secure, user-centric digital transformation and how pragmatic governance enables resilient adoption
In conclusion, mobile identity management has matured into a strategic area that intersects security, customer experience, and regulatory compliance. Organizations that treat identity as a core platform capability are better positioned to deliver seamless, secure interactions while meeting evolving privacy and assurance expectations. The convergence of biometric advances, cloud-native orchestration, and stronger regulatory mandates creates both opportunities and imperatives: opportunities to improve authentication fidelity and user experience, and imperatives to address bias, privacy, and supply chain resilience.
Decision-makers should prioritize architectures that enable modular innovation, invest in vendor and operational resilience, and adopt risk-based authentication approaches that align controls with transaction sensitivity. By doing so, organizations can reduce friction, enhance trust, and maintain agility in a landscape where technology, regulation, and threat actors are in constant flux. Ultimately, a thoughtful, evidence-driven identity program will serve as a durable enabler of digital transformation and a safeguard of both user trust and organizational continuity.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the strategic importance of mobile identity management as a cross-functional foundation for secure digital experiences and operational resilience
Mobile identity management has transitioned from a niche security discipline into a foundational capability for modern digital business. As enterprises expand mobile-first customer experiences and remote work models, identity functions are evolving beyond simple credential stores into ecosystems that connect devices, applications, and users through contextual authentication, continuous risk assessment, and privacy-preserving verification methods. This shift compels security, IT, and product leaders to re-evaluate legacy approaches and to prioritize identity as a horizontal control that underpins customer trust and regulatory compliance.
Consequently, organizations are adopting architecture patterns that emphasize interoperability, standards-based protocols, and modular services that can scale with changing requirements. Technology vendors are responding with richer solutions that bundle biometric modalities, cloud-native identity orchestration, and lifecycle management. Meanwhile, the interplay between user experience and security posture has never been more critical; friction must be minimized without compromising assurance levels. In this section, the focus is on establishing the strategic context for why identity must be treated as a core competence, highlighting the operational, regulatory, and experience-driven imperatives that guide investment and governance decisions across public and private sector organizations.
How advances in biometrics, cryptography, cloud-native orchestration, and privacy expectations are redefining identity strategies for mobile-first enterprises
The landscape for mobile identity management is being reshaped by a series of transformative shifts that affect technology selection, operational models, and risk calculus. Advances in biometric capture and on-device processing are enabling higher assurance authentication with reduced latency, while advances in cryptographic techniques, such as privacy-preserving authentication and decentralized identifiers, are expanding options for user-centric identity models. At the same time, cloud-native architectures and identity orchestration platforms are making it easier to integrate heterogeneous authentication methods and to deliver consistent policy enforcement across digital touchpoints.
These technical changes are mirrored by operational shifts: security teams are moving from perimeter-centric defenses to adaptive, context-aware controls that consider device posture, behavioral signals, location, and transaction risk. Regulatory developments are accelerating adoption of stronger authentication in sensitive verticals, and privacy expectations are driving demand for solutions that minimize data exposure and support consented data flows. Taken together, these dynamics press organizations to adopt modular, standards-conscious approaches and to prioritize vendor ecosystems that can support rapid composability, measurable assurance, and clear auditability across a diverse set of mobile and connected use cases.
Assessing the operational and procurement impacts of the 2025 United States tariff measures on hardware-dependent identity solutions and supplier strategies
The introduction of new tariff regimes and trade adjustments in the United States for 2025 introduces practical considerations for procurement, supply chain continuity, and vendor sourcing in the mobile identity ecosystem. Hardware components, certain embedded security modules, and cross-border service arrangements can be directly affected by changing duties and import rules, which in turn influence total cost of ownership calculations, vendor selection, and risk assessments related to supplier concentration. Procurement and sourcing teams must therefore incorporate tariff sensitivity into vendor evaluations and contractual terms.
Beyond direct cost implications, the tariff environment can accelerate diversification of supply chains and spur interest in local manufacturing, assembly, and service delivery models that reduce exposure to customs volatility. For organizations with complex, multinational deployments, tariffs can also drive strategic shifts toward software-centric solutions or cloud-delivered services that decouple functionality from physical component flows. In response, identity program leaders should reassess vendor roadmaps, evaluate alternative supplier networks, and consider contractual protections that allocate tariff risk appropriately while preserving continuity of security and compliance capabilities.
Segment-specific realities revealing how organization scale, component makeup, deployment architecture, authentication modalities, and vertical drivers determine identity priorities
A nuanced understanding of segmentation informs where investment and competitive differentiation will matter most. When examining organization size, differentiation appears between Large Enterprises and Small And Medium Enterprises, with the latter further divided into Medium Enterprises and Small Enterprises; large organizations tend to prioritize integrated governance, scalability, and cross-border compliance, while medium and small entities emphasize simplified deployment, cost predictability, and vendor-managed services. Considering component segmentation, solutions are complemented by services where Integration And Consulting and Support And Maintenance play a pivotal role, and solution stacks combine Hardware and Software components, each requiring distinct procurement, lifecycle management, and support models.
Deployment mode segmentation-Cloud, Hybrid, and On-Premises-reveals differing risk profiles and operational requirements; Cloud deployments often offer faster feature delivery and managed updates, whereas On-Premises remains relevant for environments with stringent data residency constraints and legacy integration needs; Hybrid approaches enable phased migration. Authentication method segmentation highlights modality trade-offs: Biometric methods such as Facial Recognition, Fingerprint Recognition, Iris Recognition, and Voice Recognition provide varying trade-offs between user experience and assurance; Certificate-Based approaches support device attestation and machine-to-machine trust; One-Time Passcode variants including Email One-Time Passcode, Hardware Token, SMS One-Time Passcode, and Software Token serve as adaptable secondary factors; Push-Based flows balance convenience and transaction confirmation. Finally, industry vertical segmentation across Banking And Financial Services, Government And Defense, Healthcare, It And Telecom, and Retail And Ecommerce shapes regulatory drivers, acceptable risk thresholds, and integration priorities, with each vertical imposing unique identity lifecycle and auditability requirements.
How regional regulatory regimes, digital identity initiatives, and adoption patterns across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific dictate localization and deployment strategies
Regional dynamics materially affect vendor strategies, deployment preferences, and regulatory requirements. In the Americas, regulatory focus on consumer protection and strong interest in cloud-delivered services create fertile ground for innovations in biometric authentication and identity-as-a-service offerings, while procurement cycles and public sector contracting patterns influence adoption timing and vendor qualification processes. Conversely, Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory regimes where data protection frameworks, cross-border data transfer rules, and national eID initiatives shape solution design and localization requirements; privacy-preserving features and strong consent models are often prerequisites for broad acceptance.
Asia-Pacific exhibits accelerated adoption curves in mobile-first services and widespread uptake of biometric modalities, driven by high mobile penetration and government-led digital identity initiatives. Localization, language support, and integration with regional payment and telematics ecosystems are practical considerations for vendor success in this region. Across all regions, interoperability with local identity infrastructures, compliance with sector-specific mandates, and the ability to deliver low-latency authentication for distributed user bases remain decisive factors for deployment success and long-term operational sustainability.
Competitive positioning and vendor differentiation driven by biometric innovation, integration ecosystems, managed services, and vertical-focused solutioning
Competitive dynamics in the mobile identity space are characterized by a blend of platform incumbents, specialized vendors, and systems integrators. Leading solution providers differentiate through investments in biometric modalities, seamless multi-factor orchestration, and developer-friendly APIs that reduce integration friction. At the same time, service partners that offer deep vertical expertise in areas like financial services, healthcare, and government are winning engagements that require tailored compliance workflows and complex legacy integrations. Partnerships and certification ecosystems have become strategic assets, enabling vendors to demonstrate interoperability with device manufacturers, cloud providers, and identity standards bodies.
Product roadmaps that emphasize privacy-preserving techniques, federated identity constructs, and strong lifecycle management are gaining executive attention as organizations seek to future-proof their architectures. Competitive advantage also accrues to firms that provide comprehensive support and managed services, allowing resource-constrained enterprises to adopt advanced authentication without the need for large in-house teams. In addition, vendors that can articulate clear outcomes-reduced fraud exposure, improved conversion in customer journeys, and streamlined compliance evidence-tend to secure larger, longer-duration engagements with enterprise and public-sector clients.
Practical strategic actions for executives to implement identity-first architecture, risk-based authentication, vendor resilience, and cross-functional governance
Leaders must act decisively to align identity strategy with broader business objectives, and immediate actions can generate measurable gains in security posture and user experience. Begin by adopting an identity-first architecture that separates authentication logic from application code, enabling consistent policies and easier vendor substitution. Parallel to architectural work, prioritize a risk-based authentication strategy that layers contextual signals and modality assurance to reduce unnecessary friction for low-risk interactions while escalating controls for sensitive operations.
Operationally, invest in vendor and supply chain resilience by mapping vendor dependencies, assessing tariff exposures, and establishing contingency sourcing plans for hardware and critical services. For organizations exploring biometric investments, run targeted pilots that validate performance across representative populations and environmental conditions to avoid biased outcomes and to quantify false acceptance and rejection implications. Finally, cultivate cross-functional governance that unites security, privacy, legal, and product stakeholders, ensuring that deployment choices align with regulatory obligations, consent frameworks, and business metrics. These measures together will position organizations to balance innovation with risk and to sustain user trust as mobile identity capabilities scale.
Comprehensive multi-method research approach combining expert interviews, technical validation, secondary analysis, and segmentation mapping to ensure pragmatic and reliable insights
The research synthesis underpinning these insights draws on a multi-method approach that balances primary interviews, technical validation, and secondary domain analysis to ensure robustness and practical relevance. Primary inputs include structured interviews with security architects, identity product leaders, and procurement specialists across enterprise and public-sector organizations, supplemented by technical briefings with vendor engineering teams. These conversations informed an understanding of real-world deployment constraints, integration patterns, and assurance trade-offs. Secondary analysis incorporated standards documents, regulatory guidance, and publicly available technical white papers to contextualize developments in biometric modalities, cryptographic techniques, and cloud orchestration.
To validate findings, technical proof points and reference implementations were reviewed, and cross-checked against vendor documentation and anonymized deployment case studies. The methodology also included a segmentation mapping exercise to ensure that recommendations and insights are aligned with organization size, component choices, deployment modes, authentication methods, and vertical requirements. Throughout, care was taken to identify potential biases and limitations, including variation in regional regulatory interpretation and rapid product evolution, which were mitigated through triangulation of sources and iterative expert review cycles.
Synthesis of why identity-as-a-platform is essential for secure, user-centric digital transformation and how pragmatic governance enables resilient adoption
In conclusion, mobile identity management has matured into a strategic area that intersects security, customer experience, and regulatory compliance. Organizations that treat identity as a core platform capability are better positioned to deliver seamless, secure interactions while meeting evolving privacy and assurance expectations. The convergence of biometric advances, cloud-native orchestration, and stronger regulatory mandates creates both opportunities and imperatives: opportunities to improve authentication fidelity and user experience, and imperatives to address bias, privacy, and supply chain resilience.
Decision-makers should prioritize architectures that enable modular innovation, invest in vendor and operational resilience, and adopt risk-based authentication approaches that align controls with transaction sensitivity. By doing so, organizations can reduce friction, enhance trust, and maintain agility in a landscape where technology, regulation, and threat actors are in constant flux. Ultimately, a thoughtful, evidence-driven identity program will serve as a durable enabler of digital transformation and a safeguard of both user trust and organizational continuity.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of passwordless authentication using biometric and behavioural analytics on mobile devices
- 5.2. Expansion of decentralized identity models leveraging blockchain for secure mobile identity verification
- 5.3. Implementation of continuous authentication frameworks to monitor user behaviour on mobile applications
- 5.4. Regulatory compliance demands driving mobile identity management standardization across global markets
- 5.5. Integration of mobile identity solutions with decentralized finance platforms for secure transactions
- 5.6. Utilization of AI-powered risk scoring in mobile identity verification to prevent account takeover
- 5.7. Emergence of digital identity wallets enabling users to control credentials across mobile ecosystems
- 5.8. Strategic partnerships between telecom operators and fintech firms to deliver secure mobile ID services
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Organization Size
- 8.1. Large Enterprises
- 8.2. Small And Medium Enterprises
- 8.2.1. Medium Enterprises
- 8.2.2. Small Enterprises
- 9. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Component
- 9.1. Services
- 9.1.1. Integration And Consulting
- 9.1.2. Support And Maintenance
- 9.2. Solution
- 9.2.1. Hardware
- 9.2.2. Software
- 10. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Deployment Mode
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.1.1. Community Cloud
- 10.1.2. Private Cloud
- 10.1.3. Public Cloud
- 10.2. Hybrid
- 10.3. On-Premises
- 11. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Authentication Method
- 11.1. Biometric
- 11.1.1. Facial Recognition
- 11.1.2. Fingerprint Recognition
- 11.1.3. Iris Recognition
- 11.1.4. Voice Recognition
- 11.2. Certificate-Based
- 11.3. One-Time Passcode
- 11.3.1. Email One-Time Passcode
- 11.3.2. Hardware Token
- 11.3.3. SMS One-Time Passcode
- 11.3.4. Software Token
- 11.4. Push-Based
- 12. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Industry Vertical
- 12.1. Banking And Financial Services
- 12.2. Government And Defense
- 12.3. Healthcare
- 12.4. It And Telecom
- 12.5. Retail And Ecommerce
- 13. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Mobile Identity Management Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. AO Kaspersky Lab
- 16.3.2. AppTec GmbH
- 16.3.3. Baramundi Software AG
- 16.3.4. Broadcom, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.6. Cloud Software Group, Inc.
- 16.3.7. F‑Secure Corporation
- 16.3.8. Fortinet, Inc.
- 16.3.9. GB Group PLC
- 16.3.10. IBM Corporation
- 16.3.11. Ivanti, Inc.
- 16.3.12. Juniper Networks, Inc.
- 16.3.13. Mitsogo Inc.
- 16.3.14. One Identity LLC by Quest Software Inc.
- 16.3.15. Oracle Corporation
- 16.3.16. S.C. BITDEFENDER S.R.L.
- 16.3.17. SAP SE
- 16.3.18. SecureAuth Corporation
- 16.3.19. Signicat AS
- 16.3.20. Sophos Limited
- 16.3.21. SOTI Inc
- 16.3.22. Telesign Corporation
- 16.3.23. Telstra Corporation Limited
- 16.3.24. Thales SA
- 16.3.25. Trend Micro Inc.
- 16.3.26. Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
