Mobile Application Security Testing Market by Testing Type (Static Testing, Dynamic Testing, Interactive Testing), Testing Approach (Manual Testing, Automated Testing, Hybrid Testing), Application Platform, Deployment Mode - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Mobile Application Security Testing Market was valued at USD 4.27 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.08 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 18.96%, reaching USD 17.16 billion by 2032.
How organizations can fortify mobile application defenses amid accelerating threats by integrating security-first development and adaptive testing strategies
Mobile applications now sit at the intersection of rapid innovation and persistent adversary activity, demanding a disciplined approach to securing code, runtime behavior, and third-party components. Development teams have compressed release cycles while attackers exploit any misalignment between delivery velocity and security controls. Consequently, organizations must reframe mobile application protection as an integral part of product engineering rather than as a downstream checkpoint.
Effective programs blend automated testing tools with human-led validation so that detection and remediation become continuous elements of the development lifecycle. Secure design principles, threat modeling, and developer training are essential complements to scanning technologies; together they reduce the time between vulnerability discovery and fix deployment. In parallel, governance and metrics need to evolve: quality and security gates should be embedded into build pipelines and prioritized by risk context rather than by checklist compliance.
As teams adopt cloud-native backends, microservices, and third-party SDKs, the surface area for exploitation grows, requiring a coordinated strategy spanning mobile app binaries, backend APIs, and supply chain components. The imperative is to create a feedback loop that converts security findings into prioritized engineering tickets, monitors remediation progress, and measures the reduction of exploitable risk over time. By doing so, organizations can sustain user trust while maintaining development momentum.
Identifying transformative shifts reshaping mobile application security through AI-driven testing, supply chain scrutiny, and developer-centric remediation practices
The mobile security landscape is undergoing fundamental transformations driven by three converging forces: the maturation of testing automation, the emergence of runtime protection, and heightened scrutiny of software supply chains. Automation has extended beyond static scanning to include dynamic application security testing integrated into CI/CD pipelines, enabling faster identification of code- and configuration-level issues during development. Meanwhile, runtime application self-protection technologies have become more sophisticated, offering behavioral detection and in-app protections that work against live exploitation attempts.
At the same time, supply chain risk management has moved from a compliance concern to a strategic priority. The proliferation of third-party libraries and SDKs means that a single vulnerable dependency can compromise an entire application ecosystem. Consequently, organizations are investing in better telemetry, SBOM practices, and continuous monitoring of component health. These trends create new expectations for testing vendors and security teams: testing must be continuous, context-aware, and tightly coupled with remediation workflows.
Finally, artificial intelligence is being leveraged to reduce false positives and to prioritize findings by exploitability and business impact. As a result, teams can focus on high-priority vulnerabilities and allocate resources more efficiently. Taken together, these shifts demand updated governance, enhanced developer education, and deeper collaboration between security and engineering to translate insights into measurable risk reduction.
Assessing the cumulative consequences of United States tariffs in 2025 on mobile application security supply chains, procurement strategies, and vendor resilience planning
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 has introduced new dynamics into procurement and vendor strategy for organizations that depend on global supply chains for tools, devices, and services related to mobile application security. Increased import costs and regulatory complexity have prompted procurement functions to reassess vendor selection criteria, focusing on supply chain resilience, local partnerships, and contractual terms that mitigate cost volatility. Organizations now emphasize diversification of vendor footprints and greater transparency into component origins to reduce single-source dependencies.
Operationally, security teams face the dual task of maintaining continuity of testing capabilities while absorbing the indirect effects of tariff-driven vendor adjustments. Some vendors have responded by relocating parts of their operations, altering service delivery models, or adjusting pricing structures. These responses require buyers to re-evaluate accountability models, service level expectations, and transition plans. In many cases, teams accelerate the adoption of cloud-hosted testing platforms or hybrid deployment models to minimize friction from hardware or on-premises dependencies.
Regulatory and compliance functions must also adapt, as procurement changes can affect contractual obligations, data residency, and the ability to meet service continuity requirements. In this environment, building cross-functional playbooks that tie procurement decisions to security risk management and operational continuity has become a best practice. Doing so helps organizations sustain testing coverage and program momentum despite external economic pressures.
Key segmentation insights revealing where service offerings, testing technologies, deployment modes, platform targets, organization sizes, and industry needs converge
Decomposing the landscape by service type reveals nuanced opportunities and operational trade-offs between advisory services and technical tooling. Services encompass consulting, managed services, penetration testing, and training, with managed services further splitting into continuous monitoring, incident response, and patch management. Software offerings include specialized tools such as DAST tools, IAST tools, RASP tools, and SAST tools, each addressing distinct phases of the development and runtime lifecycle. This segmentation underscores the importance of aligning procurement choices to specific risk vectors and resource constraints.
Testing technology segmentation clarifies which methodologies deliver value at different stages: dynamic analysis excels at runtime and integration-level issues, while interactive application security testing provides deeper insights into application behavior under instrumentation, and runtime protection mitigates exploitation in production. Static testing remains critical for early defect detection in source code. Deployment mode considerations-cloud versus on premises-introduce trade-offs between scalability, control, and data residency. Many organizations adopt hybrid deployments to balance regulatory needs with the efficiency of managed cloud services.
Application platform diversity, spanning Android, HTML5, iOS, and Windows, requires testing strategies that accommodate native, hybrid, and web-based paradigms. Organization size also shapes capability development: large enterprises often centralize specialized security functions and integrate multiple tooling layers, whereas small and medium enterprises prioritize managed services and turnkey solutions to offset resource limitations. Finally, end user industry differences-covering BFSI, government, healthcare, IT and telecom, and retail-drive distinct threat models and compliance needs, informing tailored testing scopes and remediation priorities. Together, these segmentation lenses form a practical framework for matching capabilities to risk and operational constraints.
Regional dynamics and strategic considerations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence mobile application security postures
Regional differences continue to influence strategic priorities and feasible deployment models for application security testing. In the Americas, organizations tend to emphasize scalable cloud services and a strong integration between security and DevOps, driven by a competitive push for faster release cycles and availability of experienced security talent. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a heightened focus on regulatory compliance and data residency, which often leads to hybrid or on-premises deployments and more conservative adoption timelines for third-party managed services.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digital adoption and a heterogeneous vendor landscape create demand for adaptable testing frameworks that can scale across diverse languages, platforms, and regulatory regimes. This region also displays strong interest in managed services and training to bridge skills gaps. Across all regions, supply chain considerations and device sourcing policies vary, shaping procurement and operational continuity strategies. Consequently, organizations are tailoring their testing footprints to regional constraints by combining centralized governance with local execution capabilities.
These geographic dynamics suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to program design will underperform; instead, teams should adopt regional roadmaps that balance centralized standards with localized controls, enabling consistent security outcomes while respecting regulatory and operational realities in each territory.
Competitive and collaborative movements among leading vendors, innovative challengers, and service integrators shaping the mobile security testing ecosystem
Competitive dynamics in the testing ecosystem are characterized by the coexistence of established vendors, agile challengers, and specialized managed service providers. Established vendors differentiate through comprehensive tool suites and broad integrations across CI/CD and issue tracking systems, while challengers gain traction by focusing on developer experience, reducing noise, and delivering high-fidelity findings. Managed service providers emphasize continuous monitoring, incident response readiness, and remediation acceleration, offering attractive value propositions for organizations that lack in-house depth.
Partnerships and channel models are increasingly important as vendors seek to embed testing capabilities within developer workflows and cloud platforms. Alliances that enable pre-built integrations, shared telemetry, and coordinated support contribute to smoother operational deployments and faster time to remediate. Product differentiation now leans heavily on accuracy of detection, context-aware prioritization, and the ability to instrument runtime behavior without degrading user experience.
From a procurement standpoint, buyers are looking for predictable cost structures, transparent SLAs, and clear upgrade paths. Vendors that provide robust onboarding, developer-focused documentation, and flexible deployment models tend to win longer engagements. Finally, innovation continues at the edge of automation and AI-assisted triage; vendors that can demonstrably reduce manual effort while preserving technical rigor will capture meaningful influence in enterprise programs.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate secure delivery and operationalize continuous testing across people, process, and technology dimensions
Leaders should prioritize embedding testing and remediation into engineering workflows by treating security as an engineering concern rather than a separate compliance task. Start by codifying secure defaults, integrating automated scans into pull request pipelines, and using contextual risk scoring to surface the most impactful issues to developers. Invest in training that is problem-focused and tied to real codebase examples so that learning translates directly into reduced vulnerabilities.
Operationally, organizations should adopt a hybrid approach that combines cloud-hosted tooling for scalability with targeted on-premises or dedicated deployments where regulatory needs require it. Establish clear escalation paths for high-severity findings and align incident response plans with existing DevOps playbooks to minimize friction. For talent-constrained teams, prioritize managed services that offer continuous monitoring, incident response capabilities, and patch management to maintain coverage while internal competencies mature.
Finally, governance must evolve to measure outcomes rather than output metrics. Track remediation velocity, exploitability reduction, and the proportion of high-risk issues resolved through automated versus manual interventions. Regularly review procurement contracts to ensure vendor commitments align with operational needs and supply chain realities. By operationalizing these recommendations, leaders can reduce exposure, improve developer productivity, and build a resilient security posture that scales with product growth.
Robust research methodology outlining data sources, validation processes, expert engagement, and analytical frameworks used to ensure rigorous and actionable insights
This analysis synthesizes qualitative interviews, technology assessments, and validated secondary research to ensure rigor and practical relevance. Primary inputs included structured conversations with security leaders, architects, and managed service practitioners, combined with hands-on evaluations of representative tooling and service delivery models. These discussions informed gaps and best practices around integration, false-positive management, and remediation workflows.
Secondary sources were used selectively to triangulate trends, focusing on vendor documentation, standards bodies, and publicly available regulatory guidance relevant to application security and software supply chain practices. Analytical frameworks emphasized four dimensions: detection efficacy, integration maturity with engineering workflows, operational sustainment including managed services, and supplier resilience in the face of geopolitical and economic disruptions. The synthesis applied deductive and inductive reasoning to translate evidence into actionable insights and prioritized recommendations.
To enhance transparency, findings were validated through peer review by subject matter experts and cross-checked against practical deployment experiences from diverse industries. This combination of qualitative depth and tool-level evaluation provides a robust foundation for practical decision-making while acknowledging the dynamic character of threats and technology evolution.
Concluding synthesis that underscores risk priorities, investment imperatives, and adoption pathways for resilient mobile application security programs
The synthesis emphasizes several enduring imperatives: prioritize continuous, context-aware testing; align security tooling with developer workflows; and design procurement and resilience plans that anticipate supply chain and geopolitical disruption. Risk reduction emerges from disciplined integration of automated detection, human validation, and runtime protections that together shorten the time from discovery to reliable remediation. Organizations that adopt these practices will be better positioned to maintain user trust and operational continuity.
Investments should focus on improving signal-to-noise in testing outputs, strengthening incident response and patch management capabilities, and institutionalizing cross-functional processes that connect security, engineering, and procurement. Regional considerations and organizational scale will influence how these investments manifest in specific tooling choices and delivery models, but the underlying principles remain consistent across contexts. Ultimately, success depends on leadership commitment to measurable outcomes, sustained upskilling of development teams, and pragmatic use of managed services where internal capacity is limited.
Looking forward, the interplay of automation, AI-assisted prioritization, and improved supply chain visibility will continue to reshape capability expectations. Organizations that remain adaptive, data-informed, and aligned around remediation velocity will achieve the most durable reductions in mobile application risk.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
How organizations can fortify mobile application defenses amid accelerating threats by integrating security-first development and adaptive testing strategies
Mobile applications now sit at the intersection of rapid innovation and persistent adversary activity, demanding a disciplined approach to securing code, runtime behavior, and third-party components. Development teams have compressed release cycles while attackers exploit any misalignment between delivery velocity and security controls. Consequently, organizations must reframe mobile application protection as an integral part of product engineering rather than as a downstream checkpoint.
Effective programs blend automated testing tools with human-led validation so that detection and remediation become continuous elements of the development lifecycle. Secure design principles, threat modeling, and developer training are essential complements to scanning technologies; together they reduce the time between vulnerability discovery and fix deployment. In parallel, governance and metrics need to evolve: quality and security gates should be embedded into build pipelines and prioritized by risk context rather than by checklist compliance.
As teams adopt cloud-native backends, microservices, and third-party SDKs, the surface area for exploitation grows, requiring a coordinated strategy spanning mobile app binaries, backend APIs, and supply chain components. The imperative is to create a feedback loop that converts security findings into prioritized engineering tickets, monitors remediation progress, and measures the reduction of exploitable risk over time. By doing so, organizations can sustain user trust while maintaining development momentum.
Identifying transformative shifts reshaping mobile application security through AI-driven testing, supply chain scrutiny, and developer-centric remediation practices
The mobile security landscape is undergoing fundamental transformations driven by three converging forces: the maturation of testing automation, the emergence of runtime protection, and heightened scrutiny of software supply chains. Automation has extended beyond static scanning to include dynamic application security testing integrated into CI/CD pipelines, enabling faster identification of code- and configuration-level issues during development. Meanwhile, runtime application self-protection technologies have become more sophisticated, offering behavioral detection and in-app protections that work against live exploitation attempts.
At the same time, supply chain risk management has moved from a compliance concern to a strategic priority. The proliferation of third-party libraries and SDKs means that a single vulnerable dependency can compromise an entire application ecosystem. Consequently, organizations are investing in better telemetry, SBOM practices, and continuous monitoring of component health. These trends create new expectations for testing vendors and security teams: testing must be continuous, context-aware, and tightly coupled with remediation workflows.
Finally, artificial intelligence is being leveraged to reduce false positives and to prioritize findings by exploitability and business impact. As a result, teams can focus on high-priority vulnerabilities and allocate resources more efficiently. Taken together, these shifts demand updated governance, enhanced developer education, and deeper collaboration between security and engineering to translate insights into measurable risk reduction.
Assessing the cumulative consequences of United States tariffs in 2025 on mobile application security supply chains, procurement strategies, and vendor resilience planning
The introduction of United States tariffs in 2025 has introduced new dynamics into procurement and vendor strategy for organizations that depend on global supply chains for tools, devices, and services related to mobile application security. Increased import costs and regulatory complexity have prompted procurement functions to reassess vendor selection criteria, focusing on supply chain resilience, local partnerships, and contractual terms that mitigate cost volatility. Organizations now emphasize diversification of vendor footprints and greater transparency into component origins to reduce single-source dependencies.
Operationally, security teams face the dual task of maintaining continuity of testing capabilities while absorbing the indirect effects of tariff-driven vendor adjustments. Some vendors have responded by relocating parts of their operations, altering service delivery models, or adjusting pricing structures. These responses require buyers to re-evaluate accountability models, service level expectations, and transition plans. In many cases, teams accelerate the adoption of cloud-hosted testing platforms or hybrid deployment models to minimize friction from hardware or on-premises dependencies.
Regulatory and compliance functions must also adapt, as procurement changes can affect contractual obligations, data residency, and the ability to meet service continuity requirements. In this environment, building cross-functional playbooks that tie procurement decisions to security risk management and operational continuity has become a best practice. Doing so helps organizations sustain testing coverage and program momentum despite external economic pressures.
Key segmentation insights revealing where service offerings, testing technologies, deployment modes, platform targets, organization sizes, and industry needs converge
Decomposing the landscape by service type reveals nuanced opportunities and operational trade-offs between advisory services and technical tooling. Services encompass consulting, managed services, penetration testing, and training, with managed services further splitting into continuous monitoring, incident response, and patch management. Software offerings include specialized tools such as DAST tools, IAST tools, RASP tools, and SAST tools, each addressing distinct phases of the development and runtime lifecycle. This segmentation underscores the importance of aligning procurement choices to specific risk vectors and resource constraints.
Testing technology segmentation clarifies which methodologies deliver value at different stages: dynamic analysis excels at runtime and integration-level issues, while interactive application security testing provides deeper insights into application behavior under instrumentation, and runtime protection mitigates exploitation in production. Static testing remains critical for early defect detection in source code. Deployment mode considerations-cloud versus on premises-introduce trade-offs between scalability, control, and data residency. Many organizations adopt hybrid deployments to balance regulatory needs with the efficiency of managed cloud services.
Application platform diversity, spanning Android, HTML5, iOS, and Windows, requires testing strategies that accommodate native, hybrid, and web-based paradigms. Organization size also shapes capability development: large enterprises often centralize specialized security functions and integrate multiple tooling layers, whereas small and medium enterprises prioritize managed services and turnkey solutions to offset resource limitations. Finally, end user industry differences-covering BFSI, government, healthcare, IT and telecom, and retail-drive distinct threat models and compliance needs, informing tailored testing scopes and remediation priorities. Together, these segmentation lenses form a practical framework for matching capabilities to risk and operational constraints.
Regional dynamics and strategic considerations across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence mobile application security postures
Regional differences continue to influence strategic priorities and feasible deployment models for application security testing. In the Americas, organizations tend to emphasize scalable cloud services and a strong integration between security and DevOps, driven by a competitive push for faster release cycles and availability of experienced security talent. Meanwhile, Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a heightened focus on regulatory compliance and data residency, which often leads to hybrid or on-premises deployments and more conservative adoption timelines for third-party managed services.
In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid digital adoption and a heterogeneous vendor landscape create demand for adaptable testing frameworks that can scale across diverse languages, platforms, and regulatory regimes. This region also displays strong interest in managed services and training to bridge skills gaps. Across all regions, supply chain considerations and device sourcing policies vary, shaping procurement and operational continuity strategies. Consequently, organizations are tailoring their testing footprints to regional constraints by combining centralized governance with local execution capabilities.
These geographic dynamics suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to program design will underperform; instead, teams should adopt regional roadmaps that balance centralized standards with localized controls, enabling consistent security outcomes while respecting regulatory and operational realities in each territory.
Competitive and collaborative movements among leading vendors, innovative challengers, and service integrators shaping the mobile security testing ecosystem
Competitive dynamics in the testing ecosystem are characterized by the coexistence of established vendors, agile challengers, and specialized managed service providers. Established vendors differentiate through comprehensive tool suites and broad integrations across CI/CD and issue tracking systems, while challengers gain traction by focusing on developer experience, reducing noise, and delivering high-fidelity findings. Managed service providers emphasize continuous monitoring, incident response readiness, and remediation acceleration, offering attractive value propositions for organizations that lack in-house depth.
Partnerships and channel models are increasingly important as vendors seek to embed testing capabilities within developer workflows and cloud platforms. Alliances that enable pre-built integrations, shared telemetry, and coordinated support contribute to smoother operational deployments and faster time to remediate. Product differentiation now leans heavily on accuracy of detection, context-aware prioritization, and the ability to instrument runtime behavior without degrading user experience.
From a procurement standpoint, buyers are looking for predictable cost structures, transparent SLAs, and clear upgrade paths. Vendors that provide robust onboarding, developer-focused documentation, and flexible deployment models tend to win longer engagements. Finally, innovation continues at the edge of automation and AI-assisted triage; vendors that can demonstrably reduce manual effort while preserving technical rigor will capture meaningful influence in enterprise programs.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate secure delivery and operationalize continuous testing across people, process, and technology dimensions
Leaders should prioritize embedding testing and remediation into engineering workflows by treating security as an engineering concern rather than a separate compliance task. Start by codifying secure defaults, integrating automated scans into pull request pipelines, and using contextual risk scoring to surface the most impactful issues to developers. Invest in training that is problem-focused and tied to real codebase examples so that learning translates directly into reduced vulnerabilities.
Operationally, organizations should adopt a hybrid approach that combines cloud-hosted tooling for scalability with targeted on-premises or dedicated deployments where regulatory needs require it. Establish clear escalation paths for high-severity findings and align incident response plans with existing DevOps playbooks to minimize friction. For talent-constrained teams, prioritize managed services that offer continuous monitoring, incident response capabilities, and patch management to maintain coverage while internal competencies mature.
Finally, governance must evolve to measure outcomes rather than output metrics. Track remediation velocity, exploitability reduction, and the proportion of high-risk issues resolved through automated versus manual interventions. Regularly review procurement contracts to ensure vendor commitments align with operational needs and supply chain realities. By operationalizing these recommendations, leaders can reduce exposure, improve developer productivity, and build a resilient security posture that scales with product growth.
Robust research methodology outlining data sources, validation processes, expert engagement, and analytical frameworks used to ensure rigorous and actionable insights
This analysis synthesizes qualitative interviews, technology assessments, and validated secondary research to ensure rigor and practical relevance. Primary inputs included structured conversations with security leaders, architects, and managed service practitioners, combined with hands-on evaluations of representative tooling and service delivery models. These discussions informed gaps and best practices around integration, false-positive management, and remediation workflows.
Secondary sources were used selectively to triangulate trends, focusing on vendor documentation, standards bodies, and publicly available regulatory guidance relevant to application security and software supply chain practices. Analytical frameworks emphasized four dimensions: detection efficacy, integration maturity with engineering workflows, operational sustainment including managed services, and supplier resilience in the face of geopolitical and economic disruptions. The synthesis applied deductive and inductive reasoning to translate evidence into actionable insights and prioritized recommendations.
To enhance transparency, findings were validated through peer review by subject matter experts and cross-checked against practical deployment experiences from diverse industries. This combination of qualitative depth and tool-level evaluation provides a robust foundation for practical decision-making while acknowledging the dynamic character of threats and technology evolution.
Concluding synthesis that underscores risk priorities, investment imperatives, and adoption pathways for resilient mobile application security programs
The synthesis emphasizes several enduring imperatives: prioritize continuous, context-aware testing; align security tooling with developer workflows; and design procurement and resilience plans that anticipate supply chain and geopolitical disruption. Risk reduction emerges from disciplined integration of automated detection, human validation, and runtime protections that together shorten the time from discovery to reliable remediation. Organizations that adopt these practices will be better positioned to maintain user trust and operational continuity.
Investments should focus on improving signal-to-noise in testing outputs, strengthening incident response and patch management capabilities, and institutionalizing cross-functional processes that connect security, engineering, and procurement. Regional considerations and organizational scale will influence how these investments manifest in specific tooling choices and delivery models, but the underlying principles remain consistent across contexts. Ultimately, success depends on leadership commitment to measurable outcomes, sustained upskilling of development teams, and pragmatic use of managed services where internal capacity is limited.
Looking forward, the interplay of automation, AI-assisted prioritization, and improved supply chain visibility will continue to reshape capability expectations. Organizations that remain adaptive, data-informed, and aligned around remediation velocity will achieve the most durable reductions in mobile application risk.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
180 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of mobile application security into CI/CD pipelines for faster threat detection
- 5.2. Emergence of AI-driven automated penetration testing tools tailored for mobile app vulnerabilities
- 5.3. Rising adoption of runtime application self-protection technology in mobile apps to block attacks dynamically
- 5.4. Increased focus on supply chain security analysis for mobile app dependencies and third-party libraries
- 5.5. Growth of zero trust models applied to mobile application environments leveraging continuous authentication
- 5.6. Expansion of privacy-focused security testing for mobile apps to comply with evolving data protection regulations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Testing Type
- 8.1. Static Testing
- 8.2. Dynamic Testing
- 8.3. Interactive Testing
- 8.4. Mobile Application Penetration Testing
- 8.5. Vulnerability Scanning
- 8.6. Compliance Testing
- 9. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Testing Approach
- 9.1. Manual Testing
- 9.2. Automated Testing
- 9.3. Hybrid Testing
- 10. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Application Platform
- 10.1. Android Applications
- 10.2. iOS Applications
- 10.3. Cross-Platform Framework Applications
- 10.4. Mobile Web Applications
- 11. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Deployment Mode
- 11.1. On-Premises
- 11.2. Cloud
- 11.3. Hybrid Deployment
- 12. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Mobile Application Security Testing Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. A&O IT Group
- 15.3.2. Appknox Inc.
- 15.3.3. Astra IT, Inc.
- 15.3.4. BreachLock Inc.
- 15.3.5. Cigniti Technologies Limited
- 15.3.6. Cyberops
- 15.3.7. Detox Technologies
- 15.3.8. eSec Forte Technologies Private Ltd.
- 15.3.9. eShard
- 15.3.10. HCL Technologies Limited
- 15.3.11. Indian Cyber Security Solutions
- 15.3.12. Indusface Pvt ltd.
- 15.3.13. Komodo Consulting
- 15.3.14. Kratikal Tech Pvt. Ltd
- 15.3.15. Nettitude Limited
- 15.3.16. NowSecure, Inc.
- 15.3.17. Positive Technologies
- 15.3.18. Synack, Inc.
- 15.3.19. Synopsys, Inc.
- 15.3.20. TestingXperts
- 15.3.21. Valency Networks, LLP
- 15.3.22. ValueMentor
- 15.3.23. Varutra Consulting
- 15.3.24. Wattlecorp Cyber Risk Management Services LLC
- 15.3.25. Wattlecorp Cybersecurity Labs LLP
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
