Mining Automation Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Technology (5G Connectivity, AI & Machine Learning, Autonomous Navigation Systems), Automation Level, Applications - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Mining Automation Market was valued at USD 4.25 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 4.53 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.05%, reaching USD 6.85 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction explaining why mining automation has become a core operational priority and how executives should frame technology adoption
Mining operators face a rapidly evolving technology landscape in which automation and digitization are no longer optional enhancements but core enablers of operational resilience. The introduction of advanced sensing, AI-driven decision systems, robust connectivity layers and new models for remote operations has intersected with operational pressure to improve safety, reduce downtime and optimize total cost of ownership. This introduction frames why mining automation warrants executive attention: it influences capital planning, workforce strategy, and regulatory compliance simultaneously, while redefining what peak performance looks like across surface and underground operations.
To navigate this complexity, leaders must view automation not as a single project but as a multi-year program that integrates hardware, software and services into coherent, scalable capability. This section outlines the context for the rest of the report by highlighting the drivers, common pain points, and critical success factors that shape automation initiatives. By situating technology choices within operational realities-such as ore body variability, environmental constraints and workforce skill profiles-organizations can move from technology pilots to sustained value delivery.
An in-depth exploration of the pivotal technological, regulatory, and workforce shifts that are reshaping mining automation strategy and deployment
Over the past five years the landscape of mining automation has shifted from fragmented pilots to enterprise-level programs, driven by improvements in sensors, machine intelligence and network reliability. New sensors and LiDAR units deliver richer situational awareness, while telemetry and edge computing reduce latency and increase the fidelity of real-time decision-making. At the same time, advances in machine learning have enabled more robust perception and predictive maintenance capabilities, which translate into fewer unscheduled stoppages and longer asset lifecycles.
Additionally, the rise of tele-remote operation systems and standardized interoperability frameworks has lowered organizational friction for mixed-vendor deployments. This enables mines to integrate legacy fleets alongside modern autonomous machines, smoothing the transition path. Regulatory and community expectations have also moved the needle toward safer, lower-impact operations, prompting accelerated adoption of automation where it demonstrably reduces human exposure to hazardous tasks. Meanwhile, workforce dynamics-characterized by talent shortages in field roles and growing demand for analytics and automation skills-are reshaping recruitment and training priorities. Taken together, these shifts are transforming automation from an experimental capability into a foundational element of competitive mining strategy.
A comprehensive analysis of how United States tariffs announced in 2025 reshaped supply chain strategies, procurement priorities, and service models across mining automation
The United States tariffs announced in 2025 created immediate ripples across the supply chains supporting mining automation, affecting both capital equipment sourcing and the services ecosystem. Tariff-driven cost increases on certain imported components forced many original equipment manufacturers to rethink procurement strategies, prioritize domestic supplier partnerships, and reassess bill-of-materials composition for autonomous vehicles and sensing arrays. As a result, procurement teams now place greater emphasis on supplier diversification, total landed cost analysis and contractual protections that mitigate cross-border pricing volatility.
Beyond procurement, tariffs influenced technology roadmaps by accelerating local assembly, regional distribution hubs and onshore support capabilities. Service providers adapted by expanding local maintenance and system integration capacities to reduce exposure to import-related delays. At the same time, engineering teams reassessed which subsystems could be standardized or modularized to allow for substitution without compromising performance. The net effect has been a pragmatic drive toward supply chain resilience: organizations now balance short-term cost pressures with long-term considerations such as lead times, spare parts availability and the benefits of closer technical collaboration with suppliers. Consequently, capital planning and project timelines increasingly account for geopolitical risk as a standard project parameter rather than an episodic consideration.
A layered segmentation analysis connecting components, technologies, automation levels and applications to highlight where value is created in mining automation
Understanding segmentation is critical to designing solutions that align with operational needs and investment horizons. When examining component-level implications, hardware remains central for perception and control, with cameras and LiDAR delivering high-resolution environmental data, controllers orchestrating vehicle behavior, GPS and positioning systems enabling consistent localization, and an array of sensors monitoring machine health and environmental conditions. Services complement these hardware layers; consulting and training build organizational capability, maintenance and support sustain uptime, and system integration binds disparate subsystems into cohesive operational flows. Software then layers analytics and orchestration atop data streams through data analytics platforms, fleet management software and remote monitoring systems that turn raw signals into operational decisions.
Technological segmentation further clarifies where value accrues: cellular and private 5G connectivity underpin low-latency, high-bandwidth communication, while AI and machine learning convert sensor inputs into perception, prediction and prescriptive actions. Autonomous navigation systems synthesize perception and planning to enable self-directed movement, cloud computing supports centralized analytics and long-term model training, IoT and industrial automation integrate field telemetry into control loops, and tele-remote operation systems provide human oversight at scale. The level of automation also matters; fully automated mining transforms site architecture and staffing models, remote-controlled mining enables human operators to manage machines from a distance with reduced exposure to hazard, and semi-automated approaches allow phased capability builds that protect existing workflows. Finally, application-based segmentation demonstrates where automation delivers measurable operational improvements: drilling and blasting automation improves precision and fragmentation, mine monitoring and safety systems reduce incident rates, mineral exploration and surveying enhance targeting accuracy, ore handling and transportation optimize throughput and reduce cycle times, and both surface and underground automation create safer, more predictable operating environments.
A regional perspective linking operational profiles, regulatory contexts, and infrastructure maturity to explain distinct automation adoption patterns across key geographies
Regional dynamics shape not only adoption speed but also the nature of solutions deployed and the business models that prevail. In the Americas, development is driven by a mix of large-scale open-pit operations and a growing appetite for digital transformation that blends heavy equipment automation with fleet management and tele-remote control, supported by established OEM presence and local service ecosystems. Cross-border supply chains and regional trade agreements influence sourcing decisions and aftermarket support arrangements, prompting many operators to seek partners who can provide end-to-end lifecycle services.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory scrutiny, environmental expectations and a mix of legacy underground and surface operations create demand for safety-enhancing automation and retrofit solutions that extend the life of existing assets. Vendors and integrators here emphasize modular deployments and compliance-ready architectures. In the Asia-Pacific region, high-growth resource projects, a strong manufacturing base for hardware components and accelerated adoption of cloud-native platforms combine to produce a competitive market for both turnkey automation systems and bespoke integration services. Across all regions, local workforce skills, infrastructure maturity and capital allocation priorities determine whether operators pursue rapid greenfield automation or incremental modernization of incumbent fleets.
A competitive intelligence summary describing how OEMs, software specialists, sensor innovators and integrators combine to shape the mining automation landscape and vendor selection dynamics
The competitive landscape in mining automation features a mix of established industrial OEMs, specialized automation vendors, niche sensing innovators and systems integrators that bridge hardware and software. Established equipment manufacturers leverage deep domain expertise and installed bases to offer retrofit and factory-fit automation kits, while specialist software companies focus on analytics, fleet orchestration and remote operations platforms that can be layered across heterogeneous fleets. At the same time, a wave of smaller technology firms has introduced advanced perception sensors, LiDAR packages and AI-based condition monitoring tools that push the performance envelope in specific subsystems.
Systems integrators and service providers play a pivotal role by translating vendor capabilities into operational outcomes. They combine process knowledge with engineering excellence to manage commissioning, validation and life-cycle services. Partnerships between OEMs, software providers and integrators are becoming more common, enabling bundled propositions that accelerate deployment and lower integration risk. Consequently, procurement and implementation decisions hinge on proven interoperability, local service footprints and the ability to demonstrate end-to-end value in live operational contexts.
Actionable, programmatic recommendations for industry leaders to scale mining automation with resilient procurement, workforce transition and interoperable architectures
Industry leaders should adopt a programmatic approach that balances near-term wins with durable capability building. Begin by defining clear operational objectives tied to safety, throughput or cost efficiency, and map those objectives to prioritized use cases that can be validated with measurable KPIs. Early pilots should emphasize interoperability and openness to avoid vendor lock-in; leverage modular hardware and standardized data interfaces so successful components can scale across the operation. Simultaneously, invest in workforce reskilling programs to ensure that in-house teams can operate, maintain and continuously improve automated systems.
Procurement strategies must account for supply chain resilience: favor suppliers with local support capabilities or those willing to establish regional partnerships, and include clauses that address lead times and spare parts availability. From a technology standpoint, deploy layered architectures that combine edge processing for latency-sensitive tasks with cloud-based analytics for model training and long-term insight generation. Finally, embed governance frameworks that capture learnings from pilots, manage change across stakeholder groups, and align incentive structures so that operational, technical and commercial teams share accountability for delivering sustained value.
A transparent mixed-method research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and secondary synthesis to underpin credible automation insights
The research methodology combines primary stakeholder engagement, technical validation and systematic synthesis of public and proprietary sources to create a robust evidence base for insights. Primary research involved interviews with mine operators, technology vendors, systems integrators and regulatory advisors to capture first-hand perspectives on deployment challenges, cost drivers and performance outcomes. These conversations were complemented by technical evaluations of hardware and software capabilities, including vendor white papers, product specifications and demonstration material, enabling cross-validation of claimed functionality against operational requirements.
Secondary research drew on industry publications, standards bodies and relevant regulatory filings to contextualize technological trends and compliance considerations. Data synthesis emphasized triangulation: qualitative inputs from interviews were mapped to technical specifications and public domain material to form consistent narratives. Where appropriate, case study analyses were developed to illustrate implementation pathways and extract pragmatic lessons about commissioning, change management and long-term support models. This mixed-method approach ensures that recommendations are grounded in both technical feasibility and operational reality.
A concise conclusion reinforcing that disciplined, integrated automation strategies enable safer, more reliable, and more efficient mining operations
Mining automation represents a strategic inflection point that offers measurable benefits in safety, operational efficiency and resilience when executed with discipline. The pathway to value is rarely instantaneous; it requires an integrated approach that aligns technologies, supply chains, workforce development and governance structures. Leaders who prioritize modular architectures, local service capabilities and clearly defined performance metrics will be best positioned to convert pilots into enterprise-scale programs that deliver sustained improvements.
Looking ahead, the organizations that succeed will combine conservative risk management with an appetite for intelligent experimentation, choosing deployments that reduce human exposure to hazard, increase asset availability and create predictable production outcomes. By treating automation as a continuous capability-building exercise rather than a one-off capital purchase, mining companies can create durable competitive advantage while adapting to evolving regulatory and market pressures.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction explaining why mining automation has become a core operational priority and how executives should frame technology adoption
Mining operators face a rapidly evolving technology landscape in which automation and digitization are no longer optional enhancements but core enablers of operational resilience. The introduction of advanced sensing, AI-driven decision systems, robust connectivity layers and new models for remote operations has intersected with operational pressure to improve safety, reduce downtime and optimize total cost of ownership. This introduction frames why mining automation warrants executive attention: it influences capital planning, workforce strategy, and regulatory compliance simultaneously, while redefining what peak performance looks like across surface and underground operations.
To navigate this complexity, leaders must view automation not as a single project but as a multi-year program that integrates hardware, software and services into coherent, scalable capability. This section outlines the context for the rest of the report by highlighting the drivers, common pain points, and critical success factors that shape automation initiatives. By situating technology choices within operational realities-such as ore body variability, environmental constraints and workforce skill profiles-organizations can move from technology pilots to sustained value delivery.
An in-depth exploration of the pivotal technological, regulatory, and workforce shifts that are reshaping mining automation strategy and deployment
Over the past five years the landscape of mining automation has shifted from fragmented pilots to enterprise-level programs, driven by improvements in sensors, machine intelligence and network reliability. New sensors and LiDAR units deliver richer situational awareness, while telemetry and edge computing reduce latency and increase the fidelity of real-time decision-making. At the same time, advances in machine learning have enabled more robust perception and predictive maintenance capabilities, which translate into fewer unscheduled stoppages and longer asset lifecycles.
Additionally, the rise of tele-remote operation systems and standardized interoperability frameworks has lowered organizational friction for mixed-vendor deployments. This enables mines to integrate legacy fleets alongside modern autonomous machines, smoothing the transition path. Regulatory and community expectations have also moved the needle toward safer, lower-impact operations, prompting accelerated adoption of automation where it demonstrably reduces human exposure to hazardous tasks. Meanwhile, workforce dynamics-characterized by talent shortages in field roles and growing demand for analytics and automation skills-are reshaping recruitment and training priorities. Taken together, these shifts are transforming automation from an experimental capability into a foundational element of competitive mining strategy.
A comprehensive analysis of how United States tariffs announced in 2025 reshaped supply chain strategies, procurement priorities, and service models across mining automation
The United States tariffs announced in 2025 created immediate ripples across the supply chains supporting mining automation, affecting both capital equipment sourcing and the services ecosystem. Tariff-driven cost increases on certain imported components forced many original equipment manufacturers to rethink procurement strategies, prioritize domestic supplier partnerships, and reassess bill-of-materials composition for autonomous vehicles and sensing arrays. As a result, procurement teams now place greater emphasis on supplier diversification, total landed cost analysis and contractual protections that mitigate cross-border pricing volatility.
Beyond procurement, tariffs influenced technology roadmaps by accelerating local assembly, regional distribution hubs and onshore support capabilities. Service providers adapted by expanding local maintenance and system integration capacities to reduce exposure to import-related delays. At the same time, engineering teams reassessed which subsystems could be standardized or modularized to allow for substitution without compromising performance. The net effect has been a pragmatic drive toward supply chain resilience: organizations now balance short-term cost pressures with long-term considerations such as lead times, spare parts availability and the benefits of closer technical collaboration with suppliers. Consequently, capital planning and project timelines increasingly account for geopolitical risk as a standard project parameter rather than an episodic consideration.
A layered segmentation analysis connecting components, technologies, automation levels and applications to highlight where value is created in mining automation
Understanding segmentation is critical to designing solutions that align with operational needs and investment horizons. When examining component-level implications, hardware remains central for perception and control, with cameras and LiDAR delivering high-resolution environmental data, controllers orchestrating vehicle behavior, GPS and positioning systems enabling consistent localization, and an array of sensors monitoring machine health and environmental conditions. Services complement these hardware layers; consulting and training build organizational capability, maintenance and support sustain uptime, and system integration binds disparate subsystems into cohesive operational flows. Software then layers analytics and orchestration atop data streams through data analytics platforms, fleet management software and remote monitoring systems that turn raw signals into operational decisions.
Technological segmentation further clarifies where value accrues: cellular and private 5G connectivity underpin low-latency, high-bandwidth communication, while AI and machine learning convert sensor inputs into perception, prediction and prescriptive actions. Autonomous navigation systems synthesize perception and planning to enable self-directed movement, cloud computing supports centralized analytics and long-term model training, IoT and industrial automation integrate field telemetry into control loops, and tele-remote operation systems provide human oversight at scale. The level of automation also matters; fully automated mining transforms site architecture and staffing models, remote-controlled mining enables human operators to manage machines from a distance with reduced exposure to hazard, and semi-automated approaches allow phased capability builds that protect existing workflows. Finally, application-based segmentation demonstrates where automation delivers measurable operational improvements: drilling and blasting automation improves precision and fragmentation, mine monitoring and safety systems reduce incident rates, mineral exploration and surveying enhance targeting accuracy, ore handling and transportation optimize throughput and reduce cycle times, and both surface and underground automation create safer, more predictable operating environments.
A regional perspective linking operational profiles, regulatory contexts, and infrastructure maturity to explain distinct automation adoption patterns across key geographies
Regional dynamics shape not only adoption speed but also the nature of solutions deployed and the business models that prevail. In the Americas, development is driven by a mix of large-scale open-pit operations and a growing appetite for digital transformation that blends heavy equipment automation with fleet management and tele-remote control, supported by established OEM presence and local service ecosystems. Cross-border supply chains and regional trade agreements influence sourcing decisions and aftermarket support arrangements, prompting many operators to seek partners who can provide end-to-end lifecycle services.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory scrutiny, environmental expectations and a mix of legacy underground and surface operations create demand for safety-enhancing automation and retrofit solutions that extend the life of existing assets. Vendors and integrators here emphasize modular deployments and compliance-ready architectures. In the Asia-Pacific region, high-growth resource projects, a strong manufacturing base for hardware components and accelerated adoption of cloud-native platforms combine to produce a competitive market for both turnkey automation systems and bespoke integration services. Across all regions, local workforce skills, infrastructure maturity and capital allocation priorities determine whether operators pursue rapid greenfield automation or incremental modernization of incumbent fleets.
A competitive intelligence summary describing how OEMs, software specialists, sensor innovators and integrators combine to shape the mining automation landscape and vendor selection dynamics
The competitive landscape in mining automation features a mix of established industrial OEMs, specialized automation vendors, niche sensing innovators and systems integrators that bridge hardware and software. Established equipment manufacturers leverage deep domain expertise and installed bases to offer retrofit and factory-fit automation kits, while specialist software companies focus on analytics, fleet orchestration and remote operations platforms that can be layered across heterogeneous fleets. At the same time, a wave of smaller technology firms has introduced advanced perception sensors, LiDAR packages and AI-based condition monitoring tools that push the performance envelope in specific subsystems.
Systems integrators and service providers play a pivotal role by translating vendor capabilities into operational outcomes. They combine process knowledge with engineering excellence to manage commissioning, validation and life-cycle services. Partnerships between OEMs, software providers and integrators are becoming more common, enabling bundled propositions that accelerate deployment and lower integration risk. Consequently, procurement and implementation decisions hinge on proven interoperability, local service footprints and the ability to demonstrate end-to-end value in live operational contexts.
Actionable, programmatic recommendations for industry leaders to scale mining automation with resilient procurement, workforce transition and interoperable architectures
Industry leaders should adopt a programmatic approach that balances near-term wins with durable capability building. Begin by defining clear operational objectives tied to safety, throughput or cost efficiency, and map those objectives to prioritized use cases that can be validated with measurable KPIs. Early pilots should emphasize interoperability and openness to avoid vendor lock-in; leverage modular hardware and standardized data interfaces so successful components can scale across the operation. Simultaneously, invest in workforce reskilling programs to ensure that in-house teams can operate, maintain and continuously improve automated systems.
Procurement strategies must account for supply chain resilience: favor suppliers with local support capabilities or those willing to establish regional partnerships, and include clauses that address lead times and spare parts availability. From a technology standpoint, deploy layered architectures that combine edge processing for latency-sensitive tasks with cloud-based analytics for model training and long-term insight generation. Finally, embed governance frameworks that capture learnings from pilots, manage change across stakeholder groups, and align incentive structures so that operational, technical and commercial teams share accountability for delivering sustained value.
A transparent mixed-method research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and secondary synthesis to underpin credible automation insights
The research methodology combines primary stakeholder engagement, technical validation and systematic synthesis of public and proprietary sources to create a robust evidence base for insights. Primary research involved interviews with mine operators, technology vendors, systems integrators and regulatory advisors to capture first-hand perspectives on deployment challenges, cost drivers and performance outcomes. These conversations were complemented by technical evaluations of hardware and software capabilities, including vendor white papers, product specifications and demonstration material, enabling cross-validation of claimed functionality against operational requirements.
Secondary research drew on industry publications, standards bodies and relevant regulatory filings to contextualize technological trends and compliance considerations. Data synthesis emphasized triangulation: qualitative inputs from interviews were mapped to technical specifications and public domain material to form consistent narratives. Where appropriate, case study analyses were developed to illustrate implementation pathways and extract pragmatic lessons about commissioning, change management and long-term support models. This mixed-method approach ensures that recommendations are grounded in both technical feasibility and operational reality.
A concise conclusion reinforcing that disciplined, integrated automation strategies enable safer, more reliable, and more efficient mining operations
Mining automation represents a strategic inflection point that offers measurable benefits in safety, operational efficiency and resilience when executed with discipline. The pathway to value is rarely instantaneous; it requires an integrated approach that aligns technologies, supply chains, workforce development and governance structures. Leaders who prioritize modular architectures, local service capabilities and clearly defined performance metrics will be best positioned to convert pilots into enterprise-scale programs that deliver sustained improvements.
Looking ahead, the organizations that succeed will combine conservative risk management with an appetite for intelligent experimentation, choosing deployments that reduce human exposure to hazard, increase asset availability and create predictable production outcomes. By treating automation as a continuous capability-building exercise rather than a one-off capital purchase, mining companies can create durable competitive advantage while adapting to evolving regulatory and market pressures.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
180 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Mining Automation Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Cameras and LiDAR
- 8.1.2. Controllers
- 8.1.3. GPS and positioning systems
- 8.1.4. Sensors
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Consulting and Training
- 8.2.2. Maintenance & Support
- 8.2.3. System Integration
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Data Analytics Platforms
- 8.3.2. Fleet Management Software
- 8.3.3. Remote Monitoring Systems
- 9. Mining Automation Market, by Technology
- 9.1. 5G Connectivity
- 9.2. AI & Machine Learning
- 9.3. Autonomous Navigation Systems
- 9.4. Cloud Computing
- 9.5. IoT & Industrial Automation
- 9.6. Tele-remote Operation Systems
- 10. Mining Automation Market, by Automation Level
- 10.1. Fully Automated Mining
- 10.2. Remote-Controlled Mining
- 10.3. Semi-Automated Mining
- 11. Mining Automation Market, by Applications
- 11.1. Drilling & Blasting Automation
- 11.2. Mine Monitoring & Safety
- 11.3. Mineral Exploration & Surveying
- 11.4. Ore Handling & Transportation
- 11.5. Surface Mining Automation
- 11.6. Underground Mining Automation
- 12. Mining Automation Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Mining Automation Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Mining Automation Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. United States Mining Automation Market
- 16. China Mining Automation Market
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 17.5. AB Volvo
- 17.6. ABB Ltd.
- 17.7. Accruent, LLC
- 17.8. Aspen Technology, Inc.
- 17.9. Atlas Copco AB
- 17.10. Caterpillar Inc.
- 17.11. CiGen
- 17.12. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 17.13. Epiroc AB
- 17.14. Hexagon AB
- 17.15. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 17.16. Komatsu Ltd.
- 17.17. Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH
- 17.18. Metso Corporation
- 17.19. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- 17.20. Nesans Mining and Automation Pvt Ltd
- 17.21. Rio Tinto PLC
- 17.22. Rockwell Automation, Inc.
- 17.23. Roxia Oy
- 17.24. RPMGlobal Holdings Limited
- 17.25. Sandvik AB
- 17.26. Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.
- 17.27. Sarla Advantech Pvt. Ltd.
- 17.28. Schneider Electric SE
- 17.29. Siemens AG
- 17.30. Symboticware Inc.
- 17.31. Trimble Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
