Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market by Component (Hardware, Services, Software), Technology (Active Millimeter Wave Scanners, Passive Millimeter Wave Scanners), End-User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market was valued at USD 88.71 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 111.14 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 19.65%, reaching USD 311.49 million by 2032.
A comprehensive introduction to the evolving role of millimeter wave full body scanners within layered security strategies emphasizing performance, privacy, and operational fit
Millimeter wave full body scanners have evolved from niche, high-security installations to a mainstream element of modern security architectures. Advances in sensing fidelity, software-driven image processing, and integration with identity management systems have shifted these scanners from purely checkpoint-oriented devices to components of holistic security ecosystems that support throughput optimization, threat discrimination, and privacy-preserving workflows. As facilities prioritize both safety and operational efficiency, technology selection increasingly balances detection performance with passenger or occupant experience, environmental constraints, and lifecycle maintainability.
Recent product iterations emphasize modular hardware designs and software updates that deliver new analytic capabilities without wholesale hardware replacement. This trend reduces the friction of incremental upgrades and extends the operational relevance of installed bases. Concurrently, regulatory attention to privacy and data protection, alongside evolving industry standards for operator training and quality assurance, has elevated non-technical considerations to parity with detection metrics in procurement decisions. The net effect is a marketplace where procurement teams, systems integrators, and facility operators must evaluate technology not only for scanner performance but also for integration pathways, vendor service models, and long-term interoperability with broader security management systems.
How software-driven differentiation, privacy engineering, and supply chain resilience are redefining procurement and deployment strategies for millimeter wave full body scanners
Several transformative shifts are reshaping how millimeter wave full body scanners are specified, procured, and deployed. First, there is an accelerating movement toward software-centric differentiation: analytic payloads that enable threat classification, automated anomaly highlighting, and operator decision support are increasingly decisive in procurement evaluations. This shift enables vendors to deliver meaningful capability improvements through software enhancements, reducing the need for frequent hardware refreshes and permitting rapid responsiveness to emerging threat vectors.
Second, privacy-preserving techniques and operator controls are now essential design features rather than optional add-ons. Masking, automated image abstraction, and on-device processing reduce the collection and transmission of personally identifiable imaging while maintaining detection integrity. Third, supply chain resilience and component traceability have moved to the forefront of procurement risk assessments; integrators and end-users require transparent sourcing, redundancy plans for key components such as transmitters and receivers, and documented maintenance pathways. Finally, interoperability standards and open data APIs are gaining influence, enabling integration with identity systems, analytics platforms, and incident management workflows. Together, these shifts are pushing the industry toward modular architectures, tighter collaboration between hardware and software providers, and procurement strategies that balance immediate operational needs with long-term adaptability.
Assessing how 2025 tariff changes reshaped sourcing decisions, manufacturing localization, and contractual strategies across the millimeter wave full body scanner ecosystem
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy changes in the United States in 2025 has had a cumulative effect across procurement, manufacturing, and operational planning for millimeter wave full body scanners. Import duties and related compliance requirements have increased the marginal cost of externally sourced subassemblies and complete units, prompting buyers to re-examine total cost of ownership and to pursue alternative sourcing strategies. In response, some vendors accelerated localization of key manufacturing stages or diversified their supplier networks to mitigate exposure to tariff-related cost swings and shipping bottlenecks.
Procurement teams adjusted contracting approaches to allocate risk and maintain predictable budgets. Long-term service agreements and fixed-price maintenance contracts gained appeal because they insulated operators from short-term volatility. At the same time, the regulatory overlay associated with tariff implementation created additional documentation and certification burdens, increasing lead times for cross-border purchases and influencing inventory planning. For facility operators, the practical consequences included a preference for modular systems that allowed incremental upgrades without full replacements, and a renewed emphasis on vendor transparency around component origins and compliance status. These operational adaptations reflect a market that is responsive to policy shifts and that prioritizes supply chain continuity and contractual clarity.
Key segmentation insights to align component architecture, technology modality, and end-user operational requirements with procurement and lifecycle strategies
Understanding segmentation is essential to match technology choices with operational objectives and lifecycle considerations. Based on Component, the landscape encompasses hardware, services, and software; hardware itself breaks down into critical receiver and transmitter subsystems while services include installation and ongoing maintenance obligations. This component-level view highlights how capital expenditure decisions for transmitters and receivers interact with recurring service commitments, and how software licensing and updates influence long-term system capability.
Based on Technology, solutions are distinguished between active millimeter wave scanners and passive millimeter wave scanners, each offering distinct trade-offs in terms of detection modality, environmental sensitivity, and privacy characteristics. Active systems typically introduce a controlled signal and rely on reflected energy profiles for imaging, whereas passive designs sense ambient emissions and may offer different operational profiles in crowded or variable environments. Based on End-User, deployment contexts such as airports, correctional facilities, critical infrastructure, and government buildings exert divergent requirements for throughput, false alarm tolerance, privacy constraints, and regulatory compliance. Airports prioritize high throughput and rapid resolution of alerts, correctional facilities emphasize contraband detection with durable hardware and robust chain-of-custody processes, critical infrastructure sites demand integration with perimeter and access control systems, and government buildings often balance visitor convenience with stringent access policies. Integrating these segmentation perspectives helps stakeholders prioritize investments that align with the technical, operational, and regulatory realities of their specific use cases.
Regional nuances in procurement priorities, regulatory expectations, and deployment models across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence technology adoption patterns, regulatory expectations, and vendor strategies. In the Americas, end-users often prioritize throughput and integration with large-scale identity and passenger processing systems; procurement decisions reflect the need for rapid processing in busy transport hubs as well as clear compliance frameworks for privacy and data retention. Vendors serving this region emphasize performance optimization, service networks, and partnerships that shorten installation windows while meeting municipal and federal guidelines.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory diversity and varying infrastructural maturity shape deployment priorities. Privacy regulation and strong civil liberties protections in parts of Europe necessitate robust privacy-preserving features and transparent operator practices, while some Middle Eastern and African markets emphasize ruggedized hardware and simplified maintenance pathways due to environmental and logistical constraints. Vendors often adopt flexible commercial models to accommodate public-sector procurement norms and local partnership requirements.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid modernization of airports and critical infrastructure, combined with strong government investment in security modernization, has driven widespread interest in integrated scanning solutions. This region often favors scalable deployments, strong local support ecosystems, and solutions that can adapt to dense urban environments. Collectively, these regional distinctions affect product feature prioritization, service model design, and go-to-market approaches for vendors and integrators alike.
How the interplay of established manufacturers, software specialists, and integrators is shaping product differentiation, service models, and partnership-driven deployments
Competitive dynamics in the millimeter wave full body scanner space are shaped by a mix of established original equipment manufacturers, software innovators, systems integrators, and specialized service providers. Established hardware manufacturers continue to invest in receiver and transmitter improvements while emphasizing ruggedness, safety certifications, and maintenance networks that meet institutional procurement standards. Software innovators differentiate through advanced image processing, threat scoring algorithms, and privacy-first user interfaces that reduce operator cognitive load and support auditability.
Systems integrators and service partners play a pivotal role in shaping end-user experience by combining hardware, analytics, and access control systems into cohesive solutions. Their expertise in site assessment, installation, and bespoke workflow design often determines whether a technology delivers anticipated operational benefits. Emerging entrants focus on niche opportunities such as cloud-enabled analytics, enhanced operator training platforms, and predictive maintenance models that leverage telemetry from installed systems. Across all participant types, partnerships and interoperability remain central themes, as end-users increasingly demand modular ecosystems that accommodate mixed-vendor environments and evolve without disruptive full-system replacements.
Actionable and pragmatic recommendations for procurers and technology leaders to build resilient, privacy-conscious, and upgradeable millimeter wave scanning programs
Industry leaders can take actionable steps to translate market dynamics into resilient programs that deliver security outcomes and operational efficiency. First, specify open integration interfaces and standard communication protocols to avoid vendor lock-in and to enable incremental capability additions; this creates flexibility for future analytics or identity-management modules. Second, invest in privacy engineering and operator training programs that formalize image handling, data retention, and escalation workflows, thereby reducing compliance risk and improving public acceptance. Third, prioritize modular hardware designs that allow for receiver or transmitter swaps and software-only capability upgrades, which diminishes the financial and logistical burden of technology refreshes.
Leaders should also develop supply chain risk strategies that include multi-sourcing critical components and building inventory buffers for long-lead items. Engaging early with service partners to define clear service-level agreements and predictable maintenance cycles will preserve uptime and reduce lifecycle cost uncertainty. Finally, pair procurement decisions with pilot programs that evaluate throughput, false alarm handling, and staffing impacts in realistic operating conditions. These pilots should include cross-functional stakeholders from operations, legal, and IT to ensure that technical performance aligns with policy and process requirements, enabling smoother scale-up when full deployments are warranted.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical document review, and scenario-based validation to ensure robust and actionable findings
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined structured primary engagements with domain experts and a systematic synthesis of secondary technical literature and standards documents. Primary engagements included interviews with procurement officers, security directors, systems integrators, and product engineers to gather perspectives on operational constraints, lifecycle expectations, and feature prioritization. These conversations informed a qualitative mapping of technology capabilities to end-user requirements and revealed common pain points around installation, training, and maintenance.
Secondary inputs encompassed product specifications, safety and privacy guidance, regulatory materials, and publicly available case studies that illustrate deployment patterns across sectors. The research applied a multi-criteria evaluation framework to assess hardware modularity, software upgrade pathways, privacy features, and service models. Cross-validation between primary and secondary sources helped surface consistent themes, and scenario-based analysis was used to stress-test procurement and deployment approaches under varying policy and supply chain conditions. Throughout, attention was paid to transparency in assumptions and to documenting evidence trails for key conclusions, ensuring that the findings are both actionable and grounded in observed practice.
Concluding synthesis emphasizing modularity, privacy, supply chain resilience, and operational alignment as the pillars of successful millimeter wave scanner deployment
Millimeter wave full body scanners are at an inflection point where technical maturity, policy concerns, and operational expectations converge. The collective trajectory favors modular, software-enhanced systems that balance detection capability with privacy-preserving design and clear service pathways. Procurement and deployment decisions are increasingly influenced by considerations beyond raw detection metrics, including interoperability, supply chain resilience, regulatory compliance, and the human factors associated with operator workflows.
Organizations that prioritize modular architectures, invest in staff training and privacy controls, and structure procurement to mitigate supply chain and policy risks will be best positioned to realize the operational benefits of these technologies. Thoughtful pilot programs and well-crafted service agreements will reduce implementation friction and support scalable rollouts. Ultimately, the most successful adopters will be those who align technical selection with clear operational processes and who view these scanners as components in an integrated security strategy rather than standalone appliances.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A comprehensive introduction to the evolving role of millimeter wave full body scanners within layered security strategies emphasizing performance, privacy, and operational fit
Millimeter wave full body scanners have evolved from niche, high-security installations to a mainstream element of modern security architectures. Advances in sensing fidelity, software-driven image processing, and integration with identity management systems have shifted these scanners from purely checkpoint-oriented devices to components of holistic security ecosystems that support throughput optimization, threat discrimination, and privacy-preserving workflows. As facilities prioritize both safety and operational efficiency, technology selection increasingly balances detection performance with passenger or occupant experience, environmental constraints, and lifecycle maintainability.
Recent product iterations emphasize modular hardware designs and software updates that deliver new analytic capabilities without wholesale hardware replacement. This trend reduces the friction of incremental upgrades and extends the operational relevance of installed bases. Concurrently, regulatory attention to privacy and data protection, alongside evolving industry standards for operator training and quality assurance, has elevated non-technical considerations to parity with detection metrics in procurement decisions. The net effect is a marketplace where procurement teams, systems integrators, and facility operators must evaluate technology not only for scanner performance but also for integration pathways, vendor service models, and long-term interoperability with broader security management systems.
How software-driven differentiation, privacy engineering, and supply chain resilience are redefining procurement and deployment strategies for millimeter wave full body scanners
Several transformative shifts are reshaping how millimeter wave full body scanners are specified, procured, and deployed. First, there is an accelerating movement toward software-centric differentiation: analytic payloads that enable threat classification, automated anomaly highlighting, and operator decision support are increasingly decisive in procurement evaluations. This shift enables vendors to deliver meaningful capability improvements through software enhancements, reducing the need for frequent hardware refreshes and permitting rapid responsiveness to emerging threat vectors.
Second, privacy-preserving techniques and operator controls are now essential design features rather than optional add-ons. Masking, automated image abstraction, and on-device processing reduce the collection and transmission of personally identifiable imaging while maintaining detection integrity. Third, supply chain resilience and component traceability have moved to the forefront of procurement risk assessments; integrators and end-users require transparent sourcing, redundancy plans for key components such as transmitters and receivers, and documented maintenance pathways. Finally, interoperability standards and open data APIs are gaining influence, enabling integration with identity systems, analytics platforms, and incident management workflows. Together, these shifts are pushing the industry toward modular architectures, tighter collaboration between hardware and software providers, and procurement strategies that balance immediate operational needs with long-term adaptability.
Assessing how 2025 tariff changes reshaped sourcing decisions, manufacturing localization, and contractual strategies across the millimeter wave full body scanner ecosystem
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy changes in the United States in 2025 has had a cumulative effect across procurement, manufacturing, and operational planning for millimeter wave full body scanners. Import duties and related compliance requirements have increased the marginal cost of externally sourced subassemblies and complete units, prompting buyers to re-examine total cost of ownership and to pursue alternative sourcing strategies. In response, some vendors accelerated localization of key manufacturing stages or diversified their supplier networks to mitigate exposure to tariff-related cost swings and shipping bottlenecks.
Procurement teams adjusted contracting approaches to allocate risk and maintain predictable budgets. Long-term service agreements and fixed-price maintenance contracts gained appeal because they insulated operators from short-term volatility. At the same time, the regulatory overlay associated with tariff implementation created additional documentation and certification burdens, increasing lead times for cross-border purchases and influencing inventory planning. For facility operators, the practical consequences included a preference for modular systems that allowed incremental upgrades without full replacements, and a renewed emphasis on vendor transparency around component origins and compliance status. These operational adaptations reflect a market that is responsive to policy shifts and that prioritizes supply chain continuity and contractual clarity.
Key segmentation insights to align component architecture, technology modality, and end-user operational requirements with procurement and lifecycle strategies
Understanding segmentation is essential to match technology choices with operational objectives and lifecycle considerations. Based on Component, the landscape encompasses hardware, services, and software; hardware itself breaks down into critical receiver and transmitter subsystems while services include installation and ongoing maintenance obligations. This component-level view highlights how capital expenditure decisions for transmitters and receivers interact with recurring service commitments, and how software licensing and updates influence long-term system capability.
Based on Technology, solutions are distinguished between active millimeter wave scanners and passive millimeter wave scanners, each offering distinct trade-offs in terms of detection modality, environmental sensitivity, and privacy characteristics. Active systems typically introduce a controlled signal and rely on reflected energy profiles for imaging, whereas passive designs sense ambient emissions and may offer different operational profiles in crowded or variable environments. Based on End-User, deployment contexts such as airports, correctional facilities, critical infrastructure, and government buildings exert divergent requirements for throughput, false alarm tolerance, privacy constraints, and regulatory compliance. Airports prioritize high throughput and rapid resolution of alerts, correctional facilities emphasize contraband detection with durable hardware and robust chain-of-custody processes, critical infrastructure sites demand integration with perimeter and access control systems, and government buildings often balance visitor convenience with stringent access policies. Integrating these segmentation perspectives helps stakeholders prioritize investments that align with the technical, operational, and regulatory realities of their specific use cases.
Regional nuances in procurement priorities, regulatory expectations, and deployment models across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets
Regional dynamics materially influence technology adoption patterns, regulatory expectations, and vendor strategies. In the Americas, end-users often prioritize throughput and integration with large-scale identity and passenger processing systems; procurement decisions reflect the need for rapid processing in busy transport hubs as well as clear compliance frameworks for privacy and data retention. Vendors serving this region emphasize performance optimization, service networks, and partnerships that shorten installation windows while meeting municipal and federal guidelines.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory diversity and varying infrastructural maturity shape deployment priorities. Privacy regulation and strong civil liberties protections in parts of Europe necessitate robust privacy-preserving features and transparent operator practices, while some Middle Eastern and African markets emphasize ruggedized hardware and simplified maintenance pathways due to environmental and logistical constraints. Vendors often adopt flexible commercial models to accommodate public-sector procurement norms and local partnership requirements.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid modernization of airports and critical infrastructure, combined with strong government investment in security modernization, has driven widespread interest in integrated scanning solutions. This region often favors scalable deployments, strong local support ecosystems, and solutions that can adapt to dense urban environments. Collectively, these regional distinctions affect product feature prioritization, service model design, and go-to-market approaches for vendors and integrators alike.
How the interplay of established manufacturers, software specialists, and integrators is shaping product differentiation, service models, and partnership-driven deployments
Competitive dynamics in the millimeter wave full body scanner space are shaped by a mix of established original equipment manufacturers, software innovators, systems integrators, and specialized service providers. Established hardware manufacturers continue to invest in receiver and transmitter improvements while emphasizing ruggedness, safety certifications, and maintenance networks that meet institutional procurement standards. Software innovators differentiate through advanced image processing, threat scoring algorithms, and privacy-first user interfaces that reduce operator cognitive load and support auditability.
Systems integrators and service partners play a pivotal role in shaping end-user experience by combining hardware, analytics, and access control systems into cohesive solutions. Their expertise in site assessment, installation, and bespoke workflow design often determines whether a technology delivers anticipated operational benefits. Emerging entrants focus on niche opportunities such as cloud-enabled analytics, enhanced operator training platforms, and predictive maintenance models that leverage telemetry from installed systems. Across all participant types, partnerships and interoperability remain central themes, as end-users increasingly demand modular ecosystems that accommodate mixed-vendor environments and evolve without disruptive full-system replacements.
Actionable and pragmatic recommendations for procurers and technology leaders to build resilient, privacy-conscious, and upgradeable millimeter wave scanning programs
Industry leaders can take actionable steps to translate market dynamics into resilient programs that deliver security outcomes and operational efficiency. First, specify open integration interfaces and standard communication protocols to avoid vendor lock-in and to enable incremental capability additions; this creates flexibility for future analytics or identity-management modules. Second, invest in privacy engineering and operator training programs that formalize image handling, data retention, and escalation workflows, thereby reducing compliance risk and improving public acceptance. Third, prioritize modular hardware designs that allow for receiver or transmitter swaps and software-only capability upgrades, which diminishes the financial and logistical burden of technology refreshes.
Leaders should also develop supply chain risk strategies that include multi-sourcing critical components and building inventory buffers for long-lead items. Engaging early with service partners to define clear service-level agreements and predictable maintenance cycles will preserve uptime and reduce lifecycle cost uncertainty. Finally, pair procurement decisions with pilot programs that evaluate throughput, false alarm handling, and staffing impacts in realistic operating conditions. These pilots should include cross-functional stakeholders from operations, legal, and IT to ensure that technical performance aligns with policy and process requirements, enabling smoother scale-up when full deployments are warranted.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical document review, and scenario-based validation to ensure robust and actionable findings
The research methodology underpinning this analysis combined structured primary engagements with domain experts and a systematic synthesis of secondary technical literature and standards documents. Primary engagements included interviews with procurement officers, security directors, systems integrators, and product engineers to gather perspectives on operational constraints, lifecycle expectations, and feature prioritization. These conversations informed a qualitative mapping of technology capabilities to end-user requirements and revealed common pain points around installation, training, and maintenance.
Secondary inputs encompassed product specifications, safety and privacy guidance, regulatory materials, and publicly available case studies that illustrate deployment patterns across sectors. The research applied a multi-criteria evaluation framework to assess hardware modularity, software upgrade pathways, privacy features, and service models. Cross-validation between primary and secondary sources helped surface consistent themes, and scenario-based analysis was used to stress-test procurement and deployment approaches under varying policy and supply chain conditions. Throughout, attention was paid to transparency in assumptions and to documenting evidence trails for key conclusions, ensuring that the findings are both actionable and grounded in observed practice.
Concluding synthesis emphasizing modularity, privacy, supply chain resilience, and operational alignment as the pillars of successful millimeter wave scanner deployment
Millimeter wave full body scanners are at an inflection point where technical maturity, policy concerns, and operational expectations converge. The collective trajectory favors modular, software-enhanced systems that balance detection capability with privacy-preserving design and clear service pathways. Procurement and deployment decisions are increasingly influenced by considerations beyond raw detection metrics, including interoperability, supply chain resilience, regulatory compliance, and the human factors associated with operator workflows.
Organizations that prioritize modular architectures, invest in staff training and privacy controls, and structure procurement to mitigate supply chain and policy risks will be best positioned to realize the operational benefits of these technologies. Thoughtful pilot programs and well-crafted service agreements will reduce implementation friction and support scalable rollouts. Ultimately, the most successful adopters will be those who align technical selection with clear operational processes and who view these scanners as components in an integrated security strategy rather than standalone appliances.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
190 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market, by Component
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Receivers
- 8.1.2. Transmitters
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Installation
- 8.2.2. Maintenance
- 8.3. Software
- 9. Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market, by Technology
- 9.1. Active Millimeter Wave Scanners
- 9.2. Passive Millimeter Wave Scanners
- 10. Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market, by End-User
- 10.1. Airports
- 10.2. Correctional Facilities
- 10.3. Critical Infrastructure
- 10.4. Government Buildings
- 11. Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market, by Region
- 11.1. Americas
- 11.1.1. North America
- 11.1.2. Latin America
- 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 11.2.1. Europe
- 11.2.2. Middle East
- 11.2.3. Africa
- 11.3. Asia-Pacific
- 12. Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market, by Group
- 12.1. ASEAN
- 12.2. GCC
- 12.3. European Union
- 12.4. BRICS
- 12.5. G7
- 12.6. NATO
- 13. Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market, by Country
- 13.1. United States
- 13.2. Canada
- 13.3. Mexico
- 13.4. Brazil
- 13.5. United Kingdom
- 13.6. Germany
- 13.7. France
- 13.8. Russia
- 13.9. Italy
- 13.10. Spain
- 13.11. China
- 13.12. India
- 13.13. Japan
- 13.14. Australia
- 13.15. South Korea
- 14. United States Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market
- 15. China Millimeter Wave Full Body Scanners Market
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 16.5. Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
- 16.6. InsTech Netherlands B.V
- 16.7. Leidos, Inc.
- 16.8. LINEV Systems
- 16.9. NUCTECH COMPANY LTD
- 16.10. ODSecurity
- 16.11. OSI Systems, Inc
- 16.12. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
- 16.13. Smiths Detection Group Ltd by Smiths Group PLC
- 16.14. Tek84, Inc.
- 16.15. Terasense Group Inc
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
