Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market by Service Type (Freight Forwarding, Inventory Management, Material Handling), Transportation Mode (Air, Multimodal, Rail), Deployment Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market was valued at USD 703.92 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 742.78 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.78%, reaching USD 1,189.86 billion by 2032.
Introductory framing of contemporary defense logistics challenges showing the interplay of technology, contested supply chains and operational readiness demands
Military infrastructure and logistics face accelerating complexity driven by technology, geopolitical flux and evolving operational concepts. This introduction frames the contemporary landscape where sustainment and movement of forces intersect with digital transformation, sovereign supply chain concerns and contested logistics environments. The reader will be oriented to core operational challenges ranging from throughput constraints at forward bases to the integration of autonomous and unmanned systems into established distribution flows.
The defense logistics environment is simultaneously shaped by the need for resilient physical assets such as cold storage and secure warehousing and by digital enablers that optimize inventory visibility and predictive maintenance. Transitioning from legacy stovepipes to integrated logistics ecosystems requires not only investment in material handling and transportation modes but cultural and procedural shifts across combat units, support units and civilian contracting partners. By establishing this baseline, the following sections unpack strategic inflection points, regulatory impacts and practical segmentation that leaders must address to maintain readiness and operational advantage.
How converging technological, strategic and environmental forces are reshaping defense logistics into contested, digital and resilient supply ecosystems
The logistics landscape is experiencing transformative shifts driven by three converging vectors: technology maturation, strategic competition, and environmental and infrastructural stresses. Advances in autonomy, digital twins and predictive analytics are redefining how materiel is tracked, transported and staged, enabling precision resupply even in degraded communications environments. At the same time, great-power competition is increasing the frequency and complexity of contested logistics operations, with adversary capabilities focused on disrupting supply lines through cyberattacks, anti-access/area denial tactics and targeted strikes on critical nodes.
Environmental pressures such as extreme weather events and fragile energy grids are compounding infrastructure vulnerability, prompting a migration toward distributed and hardened logistics nodes. The diffusion of unmanned aerial systems and modular sea transport creates new operational possibilities but also imposes integration and security demands. Together, these shifts force defense planners to balance speed and agility against resilience and redundancy, accelerating investments in interoperable systems, expeditionary warehousing, and secure information architectures to sustain operations under contested and dynamic conditions.
Assessment of 2025 tariff policy impacts that are driving supplier diversification, pre-positioning of strategic stocks and dual-sourcing to preserve operational readiness
Tariff policy changes in 2025 have reconfigured several elements of defense supply chains, altering sourcing strategies and raising the operational importance of supplier diversification. Increased levies on key logistics hardware components, spare parts and certain transportation-related goods have resulted in procurement teams reassessing long-held sourcing preferences and accelerating regionalization efforts to insulate critical capabilities from tariff shocks. This has elevated the role of domestic and allied suppliers in procurement planning, while also encouraging pre-positioning of strategic stocks to reduce exposure to cross-border cost volatility.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariff-driven shifts have greater operational consequences. Logistics planners must now account for longer qualification cycles for alternative suppliers, potential incompatibilities across legacy platforms, and increased lead times for specialized material handling equipment. Consequently, program managers are prioritizing modularity, commonality and dual-sourcing strategies to preserve readiness. The tariff environment has also led to deeper collaboration between acquisition, supply chain and operations functions to synchronize procurement decisions with deployment timelines and contingency plans, thereby minimizing mission disruption during periods of trade policy uncertainty.
Comprehensive segmentation insights that map service, mode, end user, application and deployment types to capability priorities and resilience measures
Segmenting the logistics domain reveals practical levers for investment and capability development when viewed through service type, transportation mode, end user, application and deployment type. Based on service type, the landscape spans freight forwarding, inventory management, material handling, packaging and distribution, transportation and warehousing, with transportation further subdivided into air, rail, road and sea and warehousing further classified into cold storage, dry storage and secure storage; this partitioning underscores where capital and operational attention should be allocated to achieve node-level resilience and throughput gains.
Based on transportation mode, capabilities range across air, multimodal, rail, road and sea, with air operations further differentiated among cargo airlines, military airlift and unmanned aerial systems, which highlights differing performance envelopes and risk profiles for time-sensitive deliveries. Based on end user, logistics design must respond to the needs of air force, army, defense agencies, marines, navy and private contractors, with army demands bifurcated between combat units and support units to reflect frontline versus sustainment priorities. Based on application, the operational workflows cover ammunition logistics, equipment transport, fuel transportation, medical logistics, personnel movement and supply distribution, wherein equipment transport separates into heavy equipment and light equipment requirements, shaping transport and handling choices. Finally, based on deployment type, mission planners must balance cross-border, offshore and onshore deployments, the latter further distinguished between base-to-base and base-to-field movements; this informs choices about packaging, staging, and transport mode selection to reduce vulnerability and improve responsiveness.
Integrating these segmentation lenses enables leaders to prioritize investments by matching capability profiles to the operational tempo and threat environment of specific end users and deployment types, thereby aligning logistics architecture with mission intent.
Regional logistics imperatives and infrastructure priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape operational readiness and alliance posture
Regional dynamics materially influence infrastructure choices, partner selection and contingency planning across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific, each presenting distinct strategic and operational imperatives. In the Americas, logistics emphasis is on continental mobility, intermodal rail-road integration and a growing focus on secure warehousing and cold chain for expeditionary medical readiness, prompting investments in robust inland corridors and resilient distribution hubs.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the logistical environment is heterogeneous: Europe prioritizes interoperable airlift and rail-linked distribution networks to support alliance operations and rapid reinforcement, while the Middle East emphasizes secure sea lanes, forward port infrastructure and hardened storage in response to regional contestation. Africa presents unique challenges of infrastructure gaps and long-haul road dependencies that necessitate tailored approaches combining local partnerships and modular warehousing. In the Asia-Pacific, the operational emphasis centers on maritime logistics, strategic pre-positioning and multimodal connectivity to address island contingencies and long-distance sustainment, with increased investment in port resilience, expeditionary berthing and rapid airlift capabilities.
Understanding these regional contrasts guides procurement, alliance management and infrastructure planning, helping decision-makers align logistics investments with both near-term operational needs and longer-term strategic posture objectives.
Key competitive dynamics showing how defense primes, specialized integrators, autonomous systems and software vendors are redefining logistics capability delivery
Competitive dynamics in defense logistics are driven by established defense primes, specialized logistics integrators, cold-chain and warehousing specialists, autonomous systems manufacturers and software providers delivering visibility and orchestration capabilities. Large defense contractors typically provide end-to-end programmatic integration and platform-compatible supply solutions, while niche logistics firms focus on expeditionary warehousing, rapid material handling and specialized transport for sensitive payloads. Software and systems vendors are increasingly prominent, supplying predictive maintenance, transport optimization and secure communications layers that enable distributed decision-making across the supply chain.
The competitive landscape also includes firms that specialize in unmanned systems and autonomous cargo platforms, which are rapidly transitioning from demonstration to limited operational deployment, particularly for airlift and last-mile resupply. Cold-storage providers and secure storage operators play a pivotal role where medical logistics and classified materiel are involved, respectively. Collaboration models-partnering between prime contractors and regional integrators or between systems vendors and special-purpose logistics companies-are becoming the default architecture to deliver speed, redundancy and compliance with evolving regulatory and security requirements.
Actionable strategic and operational recommendations to build modular, digitally enabled and geographically resilient defense logistics capabilities for contested operations
Industry leaders must pursue a set of practical, operationally focused actions to reduce risk and increase agility across contested and distributed logistics environments. They should start by instituting modularity and commonality standards for platforms and materials to reduce qualification time for alternate suppliers, which enables faster substitution when tariffs or disruptions affect preferred vendors. Next, organizations should expand dual- and multi-sourcing strategies while pre-positioning critical spares and medical stocks within allied jurisdictions to shorten replenishment timelines and mitigate trade-policy exposure.
Leaders must also accelerate integration of digital logistics layers that provide realtime inventory visibility, route risk scoring and predictive maintenance signals to demand planners and warfighters. Investments in hardened and dispersed warehousing-encompassing cold, dry and secure storage-should be paired with expeditionary material handling capabilities to sustain operations during infrastructure stress. Finally, cultivating supplier ecosystems that include unmanned aerial systems, autonomous surface platforms and specialized material-handling providers will increase operational flexibility. Collectively, these steps create a logistics posture that balances speed, security and resilience while positioning organizations to respond to dynamic operational demands.
Mixed-method research protocol combining primary operational interviews, quantitative validation and scenario modeling to produce actionable logistics insights
The research methodology applies a structured, mixed-method approach combining primary qualitative interviews, targeted quantitative data validation and layered secondary source triangulation to ensure robust and defensible conclusions. Primary engagement included interviews with logistics planners, acquisition officers, program managers and industry executives to capture operational constraints, procurement realities and technology adoption drivers. Quantitative validation used supply chain event datasets, transportation performance metrics and component procurement lead-time records to test and refine qualitative hypotheses.
Secondary research encompassed open-source defense doctrine, publicly available procurement documentation, port and transport infrastructure reports, and technical white papers on autonomy and cold-chain technologies. Analytical techniques included segmentation analysis to map capabilities by service type and deployment type, scenario modeling to stress-test logistics architectures under tariff and contested-access conditions, and sensitivity analysis to identify critical nodes and single points of failure. Findings were validated through peer review with subject matter experts and iterative feedback loops with operational stakeholders to ensure the research aligns with practical decision-making requirements.
Conclusion summarizing the imperative for modular, diversified and digitally integrated logistics to sustain readiness amid policy, environmental and contested threats
Resilient and agile military logistics are indispensable to operational success across the full spectrum of conflict and crisis response, and the evolving landscape demands decisive action to integrate technology, diversify suppliers and harden infrastructure. Leaders who proactively implement modular standards, expand dual-sourcing and pre-position critical inventories will materially reduce mission risk in the face of tariff disruptions and contested environments. Simultaneously, embedding digital logistics layers and adopting autonomous platforms where appropriate will improve speed and reduce cognitive burden on command elements.
Regional considerations and end-user-specific requirements must inform capability investments to ensure that logistics architectures are fit for mission context. Ultimately, achieving sustainable readiness requires coordinated effort across acquisition, operations and supplier ecosystems to transform logistics from a cost center into a strategic enabler. The combined effect of these measures will be an adaptive logistics posture capable of sustaining high-tempo operations while absorbing shocks from policy, environmental and adversarial pressures.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Introductory framing of contemporary defense logistics challenges showing the interplay of technology, contested supply chains and operational readiness demands
Military infrastructure and logistics face accelerating complexity driven by technology, geopolitical flux and evolving operational concepts. This introduction frames the contemporary landscape where sustainment and movement of forces intersect with digital transformation, sovereign supply chain concerns and contested logistics environments. The reader will be oriented to core operational challenges ranging from throughput constraints at forward bases to the integration of autonomous and unmanned systems into established distribution flows.
The defense logistics environment is simultaneously shaped by the need for resilient physical assets such as cold storage and secure warehousing and by digital enablers that optimize inventory visibility and predictive maintenance. Transitioning from legacy stovepipes to integrated logistics ecosystems requires not only investment in material handling and transportation modes but cultural and procedural shifts across combat units, support units and civilian contracting partners. By establishing this baseline, the following sections unpack strategic inflection points, regulatory impacts and practical segmentation that leaders must address to maintain readiness and operational advantage.
How converging technological, strategic and environmental forces are reshaping defense logistics into contested, digital and resilient supply ecosystems
The logistics landscape is experiencing transformative shifts driven by three converging vectors: technology maturation, strategic competition, and environmental and infrastructural stresses. Advances in autonomy, digital twins and predictive analytics are redefining how materiel is tracked, transported and staged, enabling precision resupply even in degraded communications environments. At the same time, great-power competition is increasing the frequency and complexity of contested logistics operations, with adversary capabilities focused on disrupting supply lines through cyberattacks, anti-access/area denial tactics and targeted strikes on critical nodes.
Environmental pressures such as extreme weather events and fragile energy grids are compounding infrastructure vulnerability, prompting a migration toward distributed and hardened logistics nodes. The diffusion of unmanned aerial systems and modular sea transport creates new operational possibilities but also imposes integration and security demands. Together, these shifts force defense planners to balance speed and agility against resilience and redundancy, accelerating investments in interoperable systems, expeditionary warehousing, and secure information architectures to sustain operations under contested and dynamic conditions.
Assessment of 2025 tariff policy impacts that are driving supplier diversification, pre-positioning of strategic stocks and dual-sourcing to preserve operational readiness
Tariff policy changes in 2025 have reconfigured several elements of defense supply chains, altering sourcing strategies and raising the operational importance of supplier diversification. Increased levies on key logistics hardware components, spare parts and certain transportation-related goods have resulted in procurement teams reassessing long-held sourcing preferences and accelerating regionalization efforts to insulate critical capabilities from tariff shocks. This has elevated the role of domestic and allied suppliers in procurement planning, while also encouraging pre-positioning of strategic stocks to reduce exposure to cross-border cost volatility.
Beyond direct cost implications, tariff-driven shifts have greater operational consequences. Logistics planners must now account for longer qualification cycles for alternative suppliers, potential incompatibilities across legacy platforms, and increased lead times for specialized material handling equipment. Consequently, program managers are prioritizing modularity, commonality and dual-sourcing strategies to preserve readiness. The tariff environment has also led to deeper collaboration between acquisition, supply chain and operations functions to synchronize procurement decisions with deployment timelines and contingency plans, thereby minimizing mission disruption during periods of trade policy uncertainty.
Comprehensive segmentation insights that map service, mode, end user, application and deployment types to capability priorities and resilience measures
Segmenting the logistics domain reveals practical levers for investment and capability development when viewed through service type, transportation mode, end user, application and deployment type. Based on service type, the landscape spans freight forwarding, inventory management, material handling, packaging and distribution, transportation and warehousing, with transportation further subdivided into air, rail, road and sea and warehousing further classified into cold storage, dry storage and secure storage; this partitioning underscores where capital and operational attention should be allocated to achieve node-level resilience and throughput gains.
Based on transportation mode, capabilities range across air, multimodal, rail, road and sea, with air operations further differentiated among cargo airlines, military airlift and unmanned aerial systems, which highlights differing performance envelopes and risk profiles for time-sensitive deliveries. Based on end user, logistics design must respond to the needs of air force, army, defense agencies, marines, navy and private contractors, with army demands bifurcated between combat units and support units to reflect frontline versus sustainment priorities. Based on application, the operational workflows cover ammunition logistics, equipment transport, fuel transportation, medical logistics, personnel movement and supply distribution, wherein equipment transport separates into heavy equipment and light equipment requirements, shaping transport and handling choices. Finally, based on deployment type, mission planners must balance cross-border, offshore and onshore deployments, the latter further distinguished between base-to-base and base-to-field movements; this informs choices about packaging, staging, and transport mode selection to reduce vulnerability and improve responsiveness.
Integrating these segmentation lenses enables leaders to prioritize investments by matching capability profiles to the operational tempo and threat environment of specific end users and deployment types, thereby aligning logistics architecture with mission intent.
Regional logistics imperatives and infrastructure priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape operational readiness and alliance posture
Regional dynamics materially influence infrastructure choices, partner selection and contingency planning across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific, each presenting distinct strategic and operational imperatives. In the Americas, logistics emphasis is on continental mobility, intermodal rail-road integration and a growing focus on secure warehousing and cold chain for expeditionary medical readiness, prompting investments in robust inland corridors and resilient distribution hubs.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the logistical environment is heterogeneous: Europe prioritizes interoperable airlift and rail-linked distribution networks to support alliance operations and rapid reinforcement, while the Middle East emphasizes secure sea lanes, forward port infrastructure and hardened storage in response to regional contestation. Africa presents unique challenges of infrastructure gaps and long-haul road dependencies that necessitate tailored approaches combining local partnerships and modular warehousing. In the Asia-Pacific, the operational emphasis centers on maritime logistics, strategic pre-positioning and multimodal connectivity to address island contingencies and long-distance sustainment, with increased investment in port resilience, expeditionary berthing and rapid airlift capabilities.
Understanding these regional contrasts guides procurement, alliance management and infrastructure planning, helping decision-makers align logistics investments with both near-term operational needs and longer-term strategic posture objectives.
Key competitive dynamics showing how defense primes, specialized integrators, autonomous systems and software vendors are redefining logistics capability delivery
Competitive dynamics in defense logistics are driven by established defense primes, specialized logistics integrators, cold-chain and warehousing specialists, autonomous systems manufacturers and software providers delivering visibility and orchestration capabilities. Large defense contractors typically provide end-to-end programmatic integration and platform-compatible supply solutions, while niche logistics firms focus on expeditionary warehousing, rapid material handling and specialized transport for sensitive payloads. Software and systems vendors are increasingly prominent, supplying predictive maintenance, transport optimization and secure communications layers that enable distributed decision-making across the supply chain.
The competitive landscape also includes firms that specialize in unmanned systems and autonomous cargo platforms, which are rapidly transitioning from demonstration to limited operational deployment, particularly for airlift and last-mile resupply. Cold-storage providers and secure storage operators play a pivotal role where medical logistics and classified materiel are involved, respectively. Collaboration models-partnering between prime contractors and regional integrators or between systems vendors and special-purpose logistics companies-are becoming the default architecture to deliver speed, redundancy and compliance with evolving regulatory and security requirements.
Actionable strategic and operational recommendations to build modular, digitally enabled and geographically resilient defense logistics capabilities for contested operations
Industry leaders must pursue a set of practical, operationally focused actions to reduce risk and increase agility across contested and distributed logistics environments. They should start by instituting modularity and commonality standards for platforms and materials to reduce qualification time for alternate suppliers, which enables faster substitution when tariffs or disruptions affect preferred vendors. Next, organizations should expand dual- and multi-sourcing strategies while pre-positioning critical spares and medical stocks within allied jurisdictions to shorten replenishment timelines and mitigate trade-policy exposure.
Leaders must also accelerate integration of digital logistics layers that provide realtime inventory visibility, route risk scoring and predictive maintenance signals to demand planners and warfighters. Investments in hardened and dispersed warehousing-encompassing cold, dry and secure storage-should be paired with expeditionary material handling capabilities to sustain operations during infrastructure stress. Finally, cultivating supplier ecosystems that include unmanned aerial systems, autonomous surface platforms and specialized material-handling providers will increase operational flexibility. Collectively, these steps create a logistics posture that balances speed, security and resilience while positioning organizations to respond to dynamic operational demands.
Mixed-method research protocol combining primary operational interviews, quantitative validation and scenario modeling to produce actionable logistics insights
The research methodology applies a structured, mixed-method approach combining primary qualitative interviews, targeted quantitative data validation and layered secondary source triangulation to ensure robust and defensible conclusions. Primary engagement included interviews with logistics planners, acquisition officers, program managers and industry executives to capture operational constraints, procurement realities and technology adoption drivers. Quantitative validation used supply chain event datasets, transportation performance metrics and component procurement lead-time records to test and refine qualitative hypotheses.
Secondary research encompassed open-source defense doctrine, publicly available procurement documentation, port and transport infrastructure reports, and technical white papers on autonomy and cold-chain technologies. Analytical techniques included segmentation analysis to map capabilities by service type and deployment type, scenario modeling to stress-test logistics architectures under tariff and contested-access conditions, and sensitivity analysis to identify critical nodes and single points of failure. Findings were validated through peer review with subject matter experts and iterative feedback loops with operational stakeholders to ensure the research aligns with practical decision-making requirements.
Conclusion summarizing the imperative for modular, diversified and digitally integrated logistics to sustain readiness amid policy, environmental and contested threats
Resilient and agile military logistics are indispensable to operational success across the full spectrum of conflict and crisis response, and the evolving landscape demands decisive action to integrate technology, diversify suppliers and harden infrastructure. Leaders who proactively implement modular standards, expand dual-sourcing and pre-position critical inventories will materially reduce mission risk in the face of tariff disruptions and contested environments. Simultaneously, embedding digital logistics layers and adopting autonomous platforms where appropriate will improve speed and reduce cognitive burden on command elements.
Regional considerations and end-user-specific requirements must inform capability investments to ensure that logistics architectures are fit for mission context. Ultimately, achieving sustainable readiness requires coordinated effort across acquisition, operations and supplier ecosystems to transform logistics from a cost center into a strategic enabler. The combined effect of these measures will be an adaptive logistics posture capable of sustaining high-tempo operations while absorbing shocks from policy, environmental and adversarial pressures.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predictive military supply chain optimization
- 5.2. Deployment of autonomous unmanned ground vehicles for battlefield logistics and supply transport
- 5.3. Implementation of blockchain technology for secure and transparent defense logistics tracking
- 5.4. Development of resilient microgrid energy systems to support remote military base infrastructure
- 5.5. Adoption of digital twin simulations for comprehensive military base infrastructure planning and maintenance
- 5.6. Expansion of 5G and satellite communication networks for seamless tactical logistics coordination
- 5.7. Utilization of additive manufacturing for on-demand spare parts production within forward operating bases
- 5.8. Enhancement of cybersecurity protocols for protecting logistics networks against emerging hybrid threats
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Freight Forwarding
- 8.2. Inventory Management
- 8.3. Material Handling
- 8.4. Packaging & Distribution
- 8.5. Transportation
- 8.5.1. Air
- 8.5.2. Rail
- 8.5.3. Road
- 8.5.4. Sea
- 8.6. Warehousing
- 8.6.1. Cold Storage
- 8.6.2. Dry Storage
- 8.6.3. Secure Storage
- 9. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Transportation Mode
- 9.1. Air
- 9.1.1. Cargo Airlines
- 9.1.2. Military Airlift
- 9.1.3. Unmanned Aerial Systems
- 9.2. Multimodal
- 9.3. Rail
- 9.4. Road
- 9.5. Sea
- 10. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Deployment Type
- 10.1. Cross-Border
- 10.2. Offshore
- 10.3. Onshore
- 10.3.1. Base To Base
- 10.3.2. Base To Field
- 11. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Application
- 11.1. Ammunition Logistics
- 11.2. Equipment Transport
- 11.2.1. Heavy Equipment
- 11.2.2. Light Equipment
- 11.3. Fuel Transportation
- 11.4. Medical Logistics
- 11.5. Personnel Movement
- 11.6. Supply Distribution
- 12. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by End User
- 12.1. Air Force
- 12.2. Army
- 12.2.1. Combat Units
- 12.2.2. Support Units
- 12.3. Defense Agencies
- 12.4. Marines
- 12.5. Navy
- 12.6. Private Contractors
- 13. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Military Infrastructure & Logistics Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. AAR Corp.
- 16.3.2. Alaska Structures of AKS Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Big Top Manufacturing
- 16.3.4. Burns & McDonnell
- 16.3.5. Claxton Logistics Services, LLC
- 16.3.6. Fluor Corporation
- 16.3.7. General Dynamics
- 16.3.8. Gillard Shelters
- 16.3.9. HDT Global
- 16.3.10. HTS TENTIQ GmbH
- 16.3.11. IRD Engineering
- 16.3.12. KBR Inc.
- 16.3.13. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
- 16.3.14. ManTech International Corporation
- 16.3.15. Marshall Land Systems Ltd.
- 16.3.16. MSS Defence
- 16.3.17. Munters
- 16.3.18. Nokia Corporation
- 16.3.19. Nordic Shelter
- 16.3.20. One Network Enterprises
- 16.3.21. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.22. Thales Group
- 16.3.23. The Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 16.3.24. Utilis S.A.S.
- 16.3.25. Weatherhaven
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
