Military Antenna Market by Platform Type (Airborne, Land, Naval), Deployment Type (Fixed, Portable), Polarization, Frequency, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Military Antenna Market was valued at USD 4.24 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.53 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.00%, reaching USD 7.30 billion by 2032.
A concise and compelling introduction that frames military antenna systems as mission-critical technology enablers central to modern multi-domain operations
The contemporary defense environment places antennas at the nexus of operational capability, enabling communications, sensing, navigation, and electronic warfare functions that are increasingly integrated and software-driven. Antennas no longer serve as passive hardware endpoints; they act as critical nodes within distributed sensor and command networks, directly influencing mission effectiveness across domains. As platforms evolve toward greater autonomy and networked operations, antenna systems must balance competing requirements for wideband performance, low observable signatures, robustness against hostile electronic attack, and rapid reconfigurability.
Across airborne, land, naval, and space platforms, design imperatives now converge on modularity and software-defined behavior, which allows a single aperture or phased array to support multiple mission modes across time. Manufacturers and integrators are responding to heightened demands for SWaP (size, weight, and power) optimization while preserving electromagnetic performance. Simultaneously, sustainment and lifecycle considerations are rising in priority as defense programs seek predictable availability under austere conditions. Taken together, these trends underscore the centrality of antenna systems to future force architectures and highlight why strategic decision-makers must treat antenna capabilities as force-multiplying enablers rather than commoditized components.
Transformation of design, manufacturing, and operational paradigms reshapes military antenna capabilities and supplier roles across multi-domain battlefields
The antenna landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging advances in materials, digital processing, and systems integration that alter both capability baselines and acquisition imperatives. Advances in semiconductor and RF front-end technologies enable wider instantaneous bandwidths and adaptive beamforming, permitting a single antenna to assume roles that historically required multiple dedicated systems. Concurrently, additive manufacturing and novel composites are enabling form-factor optimizations and rapid prototyping cycles, accelerating design iteration and lowering barriers to bespoke solutions for constrained platforms.
Operational concepts are also changing; distributed sensing and mesh-enabled communications require antennas that support dynamic network topologies and spectrum agility. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are being embedded into signal processing chains to automate calibration, detect interference, and optimize array behavior in contested environments. Moreover, the proliferation of small satellites and unmanned platforms is establishing new demand patterns for lightweight, highly integrated antenna assemblies, while advances in electronic warfare are pushing design emphasis toward resilience and graceful degradation. As a result, the industry is shifting from single-function hardware suppliers toward systems providers that can deliver integrated, software-driven antenna solutions and lifecycle support.
Comprehensive analysis of how cumulative tariff measures have reshaped supply chain resilience, sourcing strategies, and acquisition risk calculus for antenna programs
The tariff actions implemented have produced a cumulative set of effects across supply chain configurations, sourcing decisions, and cost structures that industry participants must manage proactively. Elevated duties on specific components and assemblies have incentivized defense contractors and subsystem suppliers to re-evaluate their supplier bases, leading to accelerated qualification of domestic vendors and a measured increase in localization efforts for strategic parts. While nearshoring and onshoring initiatives can mitigate exposure to trade policy volatility, they also require investment in capacity building, workforce development, and quality assurance systems to meet defense-grade production standards.
In response to heightened import costs and regulatory complexity, integrators are refining bill-of-materials strategies to identify alternative components, prioritize dual-sourcing for critical items, and redesign subassemblies to reduce reliance on tariffed inputs. These adaptations are complemented by revised contractual clauses that allocate tariff risk differently between primes and suppliers. At the program level, procurement authorities and acquisition teams are balancing total cost of ownership with schedule imperatives, and are increasingly seeking clearer visibility into upstream concentration risks. Taken together, these dynamics encourage a strategic shift toward resilient supply networks, enhanced supplier transparency, and sustained investment in domestic manufacturing capabilities.
In-depth segmentation insights revealing how platform, deployment, frequency, polarization, application, and end-user vectors drive differentiated antenna requirements and procurement dynamics
A rigorous segmentation approach reveals differentiated performance and procurement dynamics across platform, deployment, polarization, frequency, application, and end-user vectors. Based on Platform Type, market is studied across Airborne, Land, Naval, and Space, with Airborne further examined across Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle; the Land segment is explored across Field Deployable, Tracked Vehicle, and Wheeled Vehicle; the Naval segment includes Submarine, Surface Ship, and Unmanned Surface Vessel; and the Space segment is evaluated across Ground Station and Satellite. Based on Deployment Type, market is studied across Fixed and Portable, reflecting divergent design trade-offs between permanent installations and expeditionary mobility. Based on Polarization, market is studied across Circular Polarization, Dual Polarization, and Single Polarization, each presenting distinct implications for link reliability, bandwidth, and susceptibility to interference. Based on Frequency, market is studied across Low Frequency (<300 kHz), Medium Frequency (300 kHz–30 MHz), and Very High Frequency (>300 MHz), which drive antenna size constraints, propagation considerations, and platform integration complexity. Based on Application, market is studied across Communication, Electronic Warfare, Navigation, Radar, Signal Intelligence, and Surveillance, with Communication further analyzed across Beyond-Line-of-Sight, Line-of-Sight, and SATCOM, and Electronic Warfare further differentiated between Electronic Attack and Electronic Support. Based on End User, market is studied across Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Defense Agencies, Homeland Security, and Navy, each presenting unique acquisition channels, operational priorities, and sustainment models.
Taken together, these segmentation axes highlight where technical innovation aligns with operational demand and where procurement policy shapes supplier economics. Cross-segment synergies are visible where modular, software-defined architectures address needs in both airborne SATCOM and naval surveillance, while divergence appears where platform-specific constraints mandate tailored engineering solutions. Recognizing these nuances enables program managers to prioritize capability investments that deliver the highest operational leverage.
Regional perspectives that illuminate how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific procurement choices, industrial strengths, and geopolitics shape antenna capability development
Regional dynamics exert strong influence on procurement priorities, industrial partnerships, and the pace of capability adoption for antenna systems. In the Americas, defense programs emphasize rapid technology maturation, integration with allied networks, and a strong focus on domestic industrial capacity and sustainment. Procurement cycles in this region often prioritize interoperability with existing force structures and place a premium on rapid prototyping and test ranges that accelerate fielding of novel antenna concepts.
Europe, Middle East & Africa display a mosaic of procurement behaviors driven by alliance structures, export controls, and diverse operational theaters. Nations within this region pursue both sovereign capability development and collaborative programs that leverage multinational industrial participation. Export control regimes and regional security concerns shape supplier selection and platform configurations, creating opportunities for partners that can demonstrate compliance and integrated lifecycle support.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by accelerated capability modernizations, robust naval and aerial modernization programs, and a growing emphasis on space-based communications and sensor networks. Strategic competition and regional security imperatives are driving investments in resilient SATCOM, distributed sensing, and electronic protection measures. Across all regions, differences in regulatory frameworks, spectrum allocation policies, and industrial base maturity will continue to shape procurement strategies and the evolution of antenna technologies.
Key corporate strategies and competitive dynamics highlighting integration of digital processing, modularity, supply chain resilience, and service-oriented business models
Company strategies in the antenna domain are converging around a set of competitive imperatives: integration of digital signal processing with antenna hardware, establishment of resilient supply networks, and provision of lifecycle services that extend beyond initial delivery. Leading suppliers are investing in modular architectures and open-standards interoperability to reduce integration friction with platform primes and to accelerate upgrades in the field. At the same time, a significant portion of specialist firms focus on niche capabilities-advanced materials, multifunction phased arrays, and high-efficiency transmit/receive modules-thereby enabling system integrators to assemble tailored solutions from best-of-breed components.
Strategic partnerships and collaborative engineering relationships are increasingly common, as companies seek to combine domain expertise across RF engineering, software, and systems integration. Mergers and acquisitions activity tends to target complementary capabilities that fill gaps in product roadmaps or add access to critical intellectual property. In parallel, service-oriented business models, including performance-based logistics and field-programmable upgrades, are gaining traction as customers demand predictable availability and adaptability. Overall, the competitive landscape rewards firms that can demonstrate both deep technical proficiency and an ability to deliver end-to-end system assurance under operational constraints.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen supply chain resilience, accelerate capability insertion, and secure operational advantages in contested electromagnetic environments
Industry leaders should pursue a combination of strategic actions that reinforce resilience while unlocking operational advantage. First, prioritize supplier diversification and dual-sourcing for critical components to mitigate exposure to trade disruptions and single-point failures; concurrently invest in supplier development programs that raise domestic production readiness levels. Second, adopt modular, software-defined antenna architectures that enable rapid role switching and allow capability upgrades through software refits rather than hardware redesigns, thereby shortening acceptance cycles and lowering sustainment costs.
Third, embed cybersecurity and electronic protection measures early in the design lifecycle to ensure that antennas remain effective in contested electromagnetic environments. Fourth, cultivate partnerships across primes, subsystem specialists, and academic institutions to accelerate innovation while sharing technical risk. Fifth, implement rigorous lifecycle analytics and predictive maintenance frameworks to maximize platform availability and to inform spares provisioning. Finally, align R&D investments with realistic acquisition pathways by validating new concepts through representative trials and cross-domain interoperability tests. Together, these actions position organizations to respond to both near-term operational demands and evolving multi-domain threat environments.
Robust research methodology integrating primary technical interviews, laboratory validation, supply chain mapping, and scenario analysis to produce actionable intelligence
The research underpinning this executive summary employed a multi-method approach designed to triangulate technical, operational, and procurement intelligence. Primary research included structured interviews with program managers, systems engineers, and procurement officials across service branches to capture real-world requirements, integration constraints, and sustainment expectations. Technical validation was achieved through consultations with RF engineers and laboratory testing teams who assessed trade-offs among aperture design, polarization choices, and frequency-domain behavior under simulated operational conditions.
Secondary research encompassed open-source analysis of procurement documents, policy directives, and publicly available technical papers to contextualize program objectives and regulatory influences. Supply chain mapping traced critical component flows and identified concentration risks, while scenario analysis explored the implications of trade policy shifts and technology maturation pathways. Data were synthesized using a layered triangulation framework to reconcile qualitative insights with technical assessments and supply chain indicators, producing findings that reflect both field-level realities and engineering constraints.
Conclusion synthesizing the imperative for modular, resilient, and software-enabled antenna solutions to sustain operational advantage in evolving defense contexts
In summary, antenna systems are transitioning from isolated hardware items into integrated, software-driven enablers that are central to modern multi-domain operations. Technological advances in materials, digital processing, and system architectures are expanding functional envelopes while creating new integration and sustainment responsibilities for suppliers and operators alike. Trade policy developments have prompted a reorientation of supply chains toward resilience, prompting accelerated supplier qualification and localization efforts that will influence procurement and lifecycle planning.
Segmentation and regional dynamics make clear that no single solution fits all mission profiles; instead, successful capability development requires modularity, rigorous technical validation, and alignment with end-user operational doctrines. Companies that combine deep RF expertise with systems-level integration, programmatic agility, and robust service offerings will be best positioned to meet evolving requirements. Ultimately, informed acquisition strategies and targeted investments in interoperable, resilient antenna technologies will be essential to sustaining operational advantage in increasingly contested electromagnetic environments.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise and compelling introduction that frames military antenna systems as mission-critical technology enablers central to modern multi-domain operations
The contemporary defense environment places antennas at the nexus of operational capability, enabling communications, sensing, navigation, and electronic warfare functions that are increasingly integrated and software-driven. Antennas no longer serve as passive hardware endpoints; they act as critical nodes within distributed sensor and command networks, directly influencing mission effectiveness across domains. As platforms evolve toward greater autonomy and networked operations, antenna systems must balance competing requirements for wideband performance, low observable signatures, robustness against hostile electronic attack, and rapid reconfigurability.
Across airborne, land, naval, and space platforms, design imperatives now converge on modularity and software-defined behavior, which allows a single aperture or phased array to support multiple mission modes across time. Manufacturers and integrators are responding to heightened demands for SWaP (size, weight, and power) optimization while preserving electromagnetic performance. Simultaneously, sustainment and lifecycle considerations are rising in priority as defense programs seek predictable availability under austere conditions. Taken together, these trends underscore the centrality of antenna systems to future force architectures and highlight why strategic decision-makers must treat antenna capabilities as force-multiplying enablers rather than commoditized components.
Transformation of design, manufacturing, and operational paradigms reshapes military antenna capabilities and supplier roles across multi-domain battlefields
The antenna landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging advances in materials, digital processing, and systems integration that alter both capability baselines and acquisition imperatives. Advances in semiconductor and RF front-end technologies enable wider instantaneous bandwidths and adaptive beamforming, permitting a single antenna to assume roles that historically required multiple dedicated systems. Concurrently, additive manufacturing and novel composites are enabling form-factor optimizations and rapid prototyping cycles, accelerating design iteration and lowering barriers to bespoke solutions for constrained platforms.
Operational concepts are also changing; distributed sensing and mesh-enabled communications require antennas that support dynamic network topologies and spectrum agility. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are being embedded into signal processing chains to automate calibration, detect interference, and optimize array behavior in contested environments. Moreover, the proliferation of small satellites and unmanned platforms is establishing new demand patterns for lightweight, highly integrated antenna assemblies, while advances in electronic warfare are pushing design emphasis toward resilience and graceful degradation. As a result, the industry is shifting from single-function hardware suppliers toward systems providers that can deliver integrated, software-driven antenna solutions and lifecycle support.
Comprehensive analysis of how cumulative tariff measures have reshaped supply chain resilience, sourcing strategies, and acquisition risk calculus for antenna programs
The tariff actions implemented have produced a cumulative set of effects across supply chain configurations, sourcing decisions, and cost structures that industry participants must manage proactively. Elevated duties on specific components and assemblies have incentivized defense contractors and subsystem suppliers to re-evaluate their supplier bases, leading to accelerated qualification of domestic vendors and a measured increase in localization efforts for strategic parts. While nearshoring and onshoring initiatives can mitigate exposure to trade policy volatility, they also require investment in capacity building, workforce development, and quality assurance systems to meet defense-grade production standards.
In response to heightened import costs and regulatory complexity, integrators are refining bill-of-materials strategies to identify alternative components, prioritize dual-sourcing for critical items, and redesign subassemblies to reduce reliance on tariffed inputs. These adaptations are complemented by revised contractual clauses that allocate tariff risk differently between primes and suppliers. At the program level, procurement authorities and acquisition teams are balancing total cost of ownership with schedule imperatives, and are increasingly seeking clearer visibility into upstream concentration risks. Taken together, these dynamics encourage a strategic shift toward resilient supply networks, enhanced supplier transparency, and sustained investment in domestic manufacturing capabilities.
In-depth segmentation insights revealing how platform, deployment, frequency, polarization, application, and end-user vectors drive differentiated antenna requirements and procurement dynamics
A rigorous segmentation approach reveals differentiated performance and procurement dynamics across platform, deployment, polarization, frequency, application, and end-user vectors. Based on Platform Type, market is studied across Airborne, Land, Naval, and Space, with Airborne further examined across Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle; the Land segment is explored across Field Deployable, Tracked Vehicle, and Wheeled Vehicle; the Naval segment includes Submarine, Surface Ship, and Unmanned Surface Vessel; and the Space segment is evaluated across Ground Station and Satellite. Based on Deployment Type, market is studied across Fixed and Portable, reflecting divergent design trade-offs between permanent installations and expeditionary mobility. Based on Polarization, market is studied across Circular Polarization, Dual Polarization, and Single Polarization, each presenting distinct implications for link reliability, bandwidth, and susceptibility to interference. Based on Frequency, market is studied across Low Frequency (<300 kHz), Medium Frequency (300 kHz–30 MHz), and Very High Frequency (>300 MHz), which drive antenna size constraints, propagation considerations, and platform integration complexity. Based on Application, market is studied across Communication, Electronic Warfare, Navigation, Radar, Signal Intelligence, and Surveillance, with Communication further analyzed across Beyond-Line-of-Sight, Line-of-Sight, and SATCOM, and Electronic Warfare further differentiated between Electronic Attack and Electronic Support. Based on End User, market is studied across Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Defense Agencies, Homeland Security, and Navy, each presenting unique acquisition channels, operational priorities, and sustainment models.
Taken together, these segmentation axes highlight where technical innovation aligns with operational demand and where procurement policy shapes supplier economics. Cross-segment synergies are visible where modular, software-defined architectures address needs in both airborne SATCOM and naval surveillance, while divergence appears where platform-specific constraints mandate tailored engineering solutions. Recognizing these nuances enables program managers to prioritize capability investments that deliver the highest operational leverage.
Regional perspectives that illuminate how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific procurement choices, industrial strengths, and geopolitics shape antenna capability development
Regional dynamics exert strong influence on procurement priorities, industrial partnerships, and the pace of capability adoption for antenna systems. In the Americas, defense programs emphasize rapid technology maturation, integration with allied networks, and a strong focus on domestic industrial capacity and sustainment. Procurement cycles in this region often prioritize interoperability with existing force structures and place a premium on rapid prototyping and test ranges that accelerate fielding of novel antenna concepts.
Europe, Middle East & Africa display a mosaic of procurement behaviors driven by alliance structures, export controls, and diverse operational theaters. Nations within this region pursue both sovereign capability development and collaborative programs that leverage multinational industrial participation. Export control regimes and regional security concerns shape supplier selection and platform configurations, creating opportunities for partners that can demonstrate compliance and integrated lifecycle support.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by accelerated capability modernizations, robust naval and aerial modernization programs, and a growing emphasis on space-based communications and sensor networks. Strategic competition and regional security imperatives are driving investments in resilient SATCOM, distributed sensing, and electronic protection measures. Across all regions, differences in regulatory frameworks, spectrum allocation policies, and industrial base maturity will continue to shape procurement strategies and the evolution of antenna technologies.
Key corporate strategies and competitive dynamics highlighting integration of digital processing, modularity, supply chain resilience, and service-oriented business models
Company strategies in the antenna domain are converging around a set of competitive imperatives: integration of digital signal processing with antenna hardware, establishment of resilient supply networks, and provision of lifecycle services that extend beyond initial delivery. Leading suppliers are investing in modular architectures and open-standards interoperability to reduce integration friction with platform primes and to accelerate upgrades in the field. At the same time, a significant portion of specialist firms focus on niche capabilities-advanced materials, multifunction phased arrays, and high-efficiency transmit/receive modules-thereby enabling system integrators to assemble tailored solutions from best-of-breed components.
Strategic partnerships and collaborative engineering relationships are increasingly common, as companies seek to combine domain expertise across RF engineering, software, and systems integration. Mergers and acquisitions activity tends to target complementary capabilities that fill gaps in product roadmaps or add access to critical intellectual property. In parallel, service-oriented business models, including performance-based logistics and field-programmable upgrades, are gaining traction as customers demand predictable availability and adaptability. Overall, the competitive landscape rewards firms that can demonstrate both deep technical proficiency and an ability to deliver end-to-end system assurance under operational constraints.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to strengthen supply chain resilience, accelerate capability insertion, and secure operational advantages in contested electromagnetic environments
Industry leaders should pursue a combination of strategic actions that reinforce resilience while unlocking operational advantage. First, prioritize supplier diversification and dual-sourcing for critical components to mitigate exposure to trade disruptions and single-point failures; concurrently invest in supplier development programs that raise domestic production readiness levels. Second, adopt modular, software-defined antenna architectures that enable rapid role switching and allow capability upgrades through software refits rather than hardware redesigns, thereby shortening acceptance cycles and lowering sustainment costs.
Third, embed cybersecurity and electronic protection measures early in the design lifecycle to ensure that antennas remain effective in contested electromagnetic environments. Fourth, cultivate partnerships across primes, subsystem specialists, and academic institutions to accelerate innovation while sharing technical risk. Fifth, implement rigorous lifecycle analytics and predictive maintenance frameworks to maximize platform availability and to inform spares provisioning. Finally, align R&D investments with realistic acquisition pathways by validating new concepts through representative trials and cross-domain interoperability tests. Together, these actions position organizations to respond to both near-term operational demands and evolving multi-domain threat environments.
Robust research methodology integrating primary technical interviews, laboratory validation, supply chain mapping, and scenario analysis to produce actionable intelligence
The research underpinning this executive summary employed a multi-method approach designed to triangulate technical, operational, and procurement intelligence. Primary research included structured interviews with program managers, systems engineers, and procurement officials across service branches to capture real-world requirements, integration constraints, and sustainment expectations. Technical validation was achieved through consultations with RF engineers and laboratory testing teams who assessed trade-offs among aperture design, polarization choices, and frequency-domain behavior under simulated operational conditions.
Secondary research encompassed open-source analysis of procurement documents, policy directives, and publicly available technical papers to contextualize program objectives and regulatory influences. Supply chain mapping traced critical component flows and identified concentration risks, while scenario analysis explored the implications of trade policy shifts and technology maturation pathways. Data were synthesized using a layered triangulation framework to reconcile qualitative insights with technical assessments and supply chain indicators, producing findings that reflect both field-level realities and engineering constraints.
Conclusion synthesizing the imperative for modular, resilient, and software-enabled antenna solutions to sustain operational advantage in evolving defense contexts
In summary, antenna systems are transitioning from isolated hardware items into integrated, software-driven enablers that are central to modern multi-domain operations. Technological advances in materials, digital processing, and system architectures are expanding functional envelopes while creating new integration and sustainment responsibilities for suppliers and operators alike. Trade policy developments have prompted a reorientation of supply chains toward resilience, prompting accelerated supplier qualification and localization efforts that will influence procurement and lifecycle planning.
Segmentation and regional dynamics make clear that no single solution fits all mission profiles; instead, successful capability development requires modularity, rigorous technical validation, and alignment with end-user operational doctrines. Companies that combine deep RF expertise with systems-level integration, programmatic agility, and robust service offerings will be best positioned to meet evolving requirements. Ultimately, informed acquisition strategies and targeted investments in interoperable, resilient antenna technologies will be essential to sustaining operational advantage in increasingly contested electromagnetic environments.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of software-defined multi-band military antennas for agile communications across contested environments
- 5.2. Deployment of gallium nitride based phased array antennas for enhanced jam resistance and power efficiency
- 5.3. Adoption of AI-driven beamforming technologies to enable dynamic link optimization in tactical networks
- 5.4. Development of metamaterial inspired conformal antennas for stealth unmanned aerial system applications
- 5.5. Surge in low probability of intercept and detection (LPI/LPD) antenna solutions for secure electronic warfare
- 5.6. Rising demand for compact wideband antennas in portable soldier worn and small unmanned ground vehicle systems
- 5.7. Expansion of satellite communications antennas with high throughput capability for beyond line of sight operations
- 5.8. Shift toward SOSA- and CMOSS-aligned antenna modules enabling plug-and-play upgrades across ground and airborne platforms
- 5.9. Movement to digital twin workflows for antenna placement and platform integration, speeding validation of coupling, co-site interference, and EMC
- 5.10. Maritime demand for high sea‑state stabilized communication antennas with low-latency reacquisition to maintain links during aggressive maneuvers
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Military Antenna Market, by Platform Type
- 8.1. Airborne
- 8.1.1. Fixed Wing
- 8.1.2. Rotary Wing
- 8.1.3. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
- 8.2. Land
- 8.2.1. Field Deployable
- 8.2.2. Tracked Vehicle
- 8.2.3. Wheeled Vehicle
- 8.3. Naval
- 8.3.1. Submarine
- 8.3.2. Surface Ship
- 8.3.3. Unmanned Surface Vessel
- 8.4. Space
- 8.4.1. Ground Station
- 8.4.2. Satellite
- 9. Military Antenna Market, by Deployment Type
- 9.1. Fixed
- 9.2. Portable
- 10. Military Antenna Market, by Polarization
- 10.1. Circular Polarization
- 10.2. Dual Polarization
- 10.3. Single Polarization
- 11. Military Antenna Market, by Frequency
- 11.1. Low Frequency (<300 kHz)
- 11.2. Medium Frequency (300 kHz–30 MHz)
- 11.3. Very High Frequency (>300 MHz)
- 12. Military Antenna Market, by Application
- 12.1. Communication
- 12.1.1. Beyond-Line-of-Sight
- 12.1.2. Line-of-Sight
- 12.1.3. SATCOM
- 12.2. Electronic Warfare
- 12.2.1. Electronic Attack (EA)
- 12.2.2. Electronic Support (ES)
- 12.3. Navigation
- 12.4. Radar
- 12.5. Signal Intelligence
- 12.6. Surveillance
- 13. Military Antenna Market, by End User
- 13.1. Air Force
- 13.2. Army
- 13.3. Coast Guard
- 13.4. Defense Agencies
- 13.5. Homeland Security
- 13.6. Navy
- 14. Military Antenna Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Military Antenna Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Military Antenna Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 17.3.2. BAE Systems plc
- 17.3.3. Airbus SE
- 17.3.4. Alaris The RF Technology Group Ltd.
- 17.3.5. Amphenol Corporation
- 17.3.6. Antcom Corporation
- 17.3.7. Antenna Products Corporation
- 17.3.8. AvL Technologies, Inc.
- 17.3.9. Ball Corporation
- 17.3.10. Barker & Williamson
- 17.3.11. Chelton Limited
- 17.3.12. Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions
- 17.3.13. Comrod Communication AS
- 17.3.14. Eylex Pty Ltd.
- 17.3.15. Hascall-Denke Engineering and Manufacturing
- 17.3.16. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 17.3.17. Mobile Mark, Inc.
- 17.3.18. MTI Wireless Edge Ltd.
- 17.3.19. Pulse Power and Measurement Ltd.
- 17.3.20. Rami
- 17.3.21. Rantec Microwave Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.22. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
- 17.3.23. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
- 17.3.24. Sensor Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.25. Shakespeare Company, LLC
- 17.3.26. Thales Group
- 17.3.27. TRIVAL ANTENE d.o.o.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
