Medical Equipment Rental Market by Equipment Type (Diagnostic Imaging, Monitoring Equipment, Surgical Equipment), Rental Duration (Long Term, Short Term), Mode Of Rental, End-User, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Medical Equipment Rental Market was valued at USD 58.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 63.22 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.49%, reaching USD 120.00 billion by 2032.
A comprehensive introduction outlining the strategic role of equipment rental in healthcare delivery and the operational priorities reshaping provider procurement decisions
The medical equipment rental sector is navigating a pivotal moment defined by accelerating clinical demand, evolving procurement behaviors, and the increasing importance of flexible capital allocation strategies. Healthcare delivery systems are balancing the need for rapid access to advanced modalities with constrained capital budgets, prompting hospitals, outpatient centers, and home‑based care providers to reassess ownership models. This introduction frames the rental channel not as a temporary workaround but as a strategic lever for managing technology lifecycles, optimizing utilization, and mitigating obsolescence risks.
Across provider categories, decision cycles are shortening while the expectations for service, uptime, and technological parity with owned assets are rising. Consequently, rental operators are investing in logistics, remote diagnostics, and lifecycle services to provide differentiated value beyond mere equipment provisioning. In parallel, regulatory emphasis on device traceability, cleaning protocols, and interoperability raises the bar for compliance and operational transparency. Taken together, these forces are reshaping how stakeholders evaluate rental arrangements and partner with vendors, making strategic alignment, contract flexibility, and robust service delivery the hallmarks of successful rental propositions.
How rapid technological advances, decentralized care models, and service innovation are transforming rental propositions and operational priorities across the healthcare value chain
Fundamental shifts are redefining the competitive dynamics of the rental landscape, as technology convergence, care decentralization, and service innovation intersect to create new opportunity sets. Advances in portable diagnostic imaging and remote monitoring permit high‑acuity care to move closer to the patient, which in turn drives demand for short‑term and on‑demand rental solutions that support episodic surges and pilot programs. Simultaneously, the maturation of robotics and minimally invasive surgical platforms is increasing uptake of rental models for clinics and ambulatory surgery centers that lack the capital to acquire cutting‑edge systems outright.
Operationally, supply chain resilience and asset utilization analytics are becoming critical differentiators. Rental operators that deploy predictive maintenance and real‑time telemetry can reduce downtime, optimize redeployment, and demonstrate measurable service levels. Meanwhile, reimbursement and care delivery policy changes continue to influence where and how services are consumed, prompting rental providers to refine value propositions for home care, outpatient diagnostics, and cross‑institutional sharing programs. These transformative shifts emphasize a move from simple equipment leasing to integrated solutions that bundle training, asset management, and clinical outcomes support.
The 2025 tariff environment and its operational and strategic reverberations across procurement, contracting, and supply chain resilience for rental operators and providers
The introduction of tariffs in 2025 has introduced a layer of complexity that ripples across procurement, pricing, and supply chain planning for rental operators and healthcare providers alike. Increased import costs for components and finished devices influence acquisition strategies, encouraging some providers to extend equipment lifecycle through enhanced maintenance and to prioritize rental arrangements that shift capital exposure. As a result, rental firms are recalibrating procurement pipelines, renegotiating supplier terms, and exploring alternative sourcing to preserve margin and maintain competitive pricing structures.
In response to tariff‑driven cost pressures, many industry participants have accelerated localization efforts and supplier diversification to reduce exposure to trade policy volatility. Contract design has adapted to include more explicit clauses addressing customs, duties, and pass‑through costs, thereby improving transparency for end users. Additionally, operators have invested in inventory buffering and forward procurement where feasible to hedge short‑term price shocks. Collectively, these adjustments reflect a pragmatic approach to managing geopolitical risk, maintaining service continuity, and supporting provider demand in an environment where external policy factors can materially influence total cost of ownership and operational planning.
In‑depth segmentation insights that map equipment categories, end‑user behaviors, rental durations, modes of delivery, and clinical applications to rental strategy and service design
Segmentation by equipment type highlights a broad spectrum of clinical needs and service complexities, with Diagnostic Imaging encompassing CT, MRI, Nuclear Imaging, Ultrasound, and X‑Ray systems that demand high capital intensity, regulatory scrutiny, and specialist servicing; Monitoring Equipment covering Cardiac Monitoring, Fetal Monitoring, and Vital Signs Monitoring that require continual connectivity and data integration; Surgical Equipment spanning Endoscopy, Lasers, and Robotic platforms that combine precision hardware with consumable and software ecosystems; and Therapeutic Equipment including Dialysis, Infusion Pumps, and Respiratory devices where safety, consumable supply chains, and infection control protocols are paramount. Each equipment category carries distinct maintenance cadences, spare parts profiles, and training needs, which influence rental pricing models, contract lengths, and value‑added service offerings.
End‑user segmentation reveals differentiated demand patterns across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, clinics, diagnostic centers, and home care. Hospitals often seek long‑term arrangements with comprehensive service level agreements to support continuous care, while ambulatory surgery centers and diagnostic centers prioritize access to specialized platforms for procedural throughput without large capital commitments. Clinics and home care environments require rental options that emphasize portability, ease of use, and simplified maintenance. Rental duration considerations-long term versus short term-shape asset management strategies and redeployment logistics, with long‑term rentals aligning with predictable needs and short‑term rentals addressing seasonal surges, capacity spikes, or pilot testing. The mode of rental, whether off‑premise or on‑premise, further informs responsibilities for installation, service, and regulatory compliance. Finally, application areas such as Cardiology, Neurology, Oncology, and Orthopedics influence both the technical specifications of equipment and the ancillary services required to ensure clinical efficacy, thereby guiding how rental operators package solutions for specialized care pathways.
Regional dynamics shaping rental demand and operational models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific with implications for service design and compliance
Regional dynamics significantly influence demand drivers, regulatory environments, and operational models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific regions. In the Americas, providers increasingly prioritize flexible capital deployment and value‑based arrangements, driving demand for rental models that support rapid adoption of diagnostic and monitoring technologies while preserving balance sheet flexibility. This region also sees a high emphasis on service reliability and integrated maintenance programs to support large hospital networks and ambulatory chains.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, the regulatory heterogeneity and varying reimbursement landscapes create opportunities for rental operators to tailor offerings to national priorities, from centralized procurement systems to private healthcare networks. Compliance, device reprocessing standards, and cross‑border logistics are prominent considerations. In the Asia‑Pacific region, rapid infrastructure investment, expanding private care, and an emphasis on decentralized diagnostics are accelerating adoption of rental solutions, particularly for high‑value imaging and surgical technologies. Operators active in these regions are adapting business models to accommodate differences in capital access, clinical staffing, and logistical complexity, while leveraging digital platforms to scale asset management and remote support.
How leading rental companies are differentiating through service ecosystems, predictive maintenance, and strategic partnerships to secure provider trust and operational scale
Competitive positioning in the rental landscape is increasingly determined by capabilities beyond equipment inventory, including logistics networks, clinical training services, digital asset management, and value‑added maintenance. Leading companies are investing in telemetry and predictive maintenance tools to reduce downtime and to provide verifiable performance metrics to clients. Strategic partnerships with device manufacturers, healthcare systems, and financing partners are emerging as critical levers for accessing advanced technologies and for co‑developing bundled solutions that align with provider workflows.
Moreover, some operators are differentiating through specialized clinical advisory services that help clients integrate rented equipment into care pathways and demonstrate clinical value. Others focus on operational excellence, scaling rapid deployment capabilities and standardized reprocessing workflows to serve high‑volume outpatient and home care segments. Mergers, strategic alliances, and service partnerships are common as firms seek to broaden geographic reach and deepen technical expertise. Ultimately, firms that combine robust service ecosystems with transparent contracting and strong compliance practices will be best positioned to capture demand from systems prioritizing uptime, safety, and predictable lifecycle costs.
Actionable recommendations for rental operators to invest in digital service delivery, supply chain resilience, clinical partnerships, and flexible contracting to drive sustained growth
Industry leaders should prioritize a blend of service innovation, supply chain agility, and close alignment with clinical workflows to remain competitive and resilient. Operators must invest in digital capabilities that enable remote monitoring, predictive maintenance, and streamlined scheduling, thereby improving asset uptime and demonstrating tangible operational value to clients. Equally important is the development of flexible contract structures that accommodate varying rental durations, usage patterns, and compliance requirements for different end users.
Supply chain diversification and localized spare parts networks will reduce exposure to tariff‑driven disruptions and accelerate response times. Leaders should also formalize clinical partnerships that provide co‑development opportunities, training programs, and outcome measurement frameworks, which in turn create sticky customer relationships. Finally, transparency in pricing, clear allocation of service responsibilities between providers and operators, and robust post‑rental reprocessing protocols will strengthen trust with procurement teams. By executing on these priorities, companies can convert transactional interactions into strategic partnerships that support long‑term adoption of rental solutions.
A rigorous mixed‑methods research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, regulatory analysis, and comparative scenario planning to derive actionable industry insights
The research underpinning this analysis combines primary interviews with procurement executives, rental operators, clinical leaders, and supply chain specialists, supplemented by systematic secondary review of regulatory frameworks, device standards, and observable procurement trends. Primary engagements focused on operational practices, service level expectations, and decision criteria for rental adoption, while secondary materials provided context on device categories, interoperability requirements, and regional regulatory variation. Data collection emphasized qualitative insights into contract design, maintenance workflows, and the interplay between clinical needs and rental service features.
Analytical approaches included thematic synthesis of interview findings, cross‑regional comparative analysis, and scenario planning to explore how policy shifts and technological trends could alter operational priorities. Care was taken to triangulate perspectives across stakeholders to produce balanced conclusions. Throughout the methodology, ethical considerations and data confidentiality were maintained, and sources were evaluated for relevance and recency to ensure the analysis reflects contemporary industry dynamics and practical implications for providers and rental operators.
A concise conclusion synthesizing how strategic service innovation, supply chain resilience, and clinical alignment will determine leadership in the evolving rental landscape
In summary, the medical equipment rental sector is transitioning from a tactical financing alternative to a strategic supply model that supports clinical innovation, operational flexibility, and risk mitigation. The convergence of portable technologies, heightened expectations for service quality, and evolving procurement practices creates a fertile environment for rental operators that can deliver integrated solutions, demonstrate reliability, and align contracts with clinical and financial objectives. At the same time, external factors such as trade policy, regional regulatory diversity, and shifting care delivery models will continue to shape operational priorities and service design choices.
Providers and rental firms that proactively invest in digital service capabilities, diversify supply chains, and cultivate clinical partnerships will be better equipped to capture emerging opportunities and to withstand policy and market headwinds. The sector’s trajectory favors operators who view rentals as platforms for service innovation rather than mere asset transactions, thus enabling sustained collaboration with healthcare systems seeking to enhance access to advanced care while managing capital and operational constraints.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A comprehensive introduction outlining the strategic role of equipment rental in healthcare delivery and the operational priorities reshaping provider procurement decisions
The medical equipment rental sector is navigating a pivotal moment defined by accelerating clinical demand, evolving procurement behaviors, and the increasing importance of flexible capital allocation strategies. Healthcare delivery systems are balancing the need for rapid access to advanced modalities with constrained capital budgets, prompting hospitals, outpatient centers, and home‑based care providers to reassess ownership models. This introduction frames the rental channel not as a temporary workaround but as a strategic lever for managing technology lifecycles, optimizing utilization, and mitigating obsolescence risks.
Across provider categories, decision cycles are shortening while the expectations for service, uptime, and technological parity with owned assets are rising. Consequently, rental operators are investing in logistics, remote diagnostics, and lifecycle services to provide differentiated value beyond mere equipment provisioning. In parallel, regulatory emphasis on device traceability, cleaning protocols, and interoperability raises the bar for compliance and operational transparency. Taken together, these forces are reshaping how stakeholders evaluate rental arrangements and partner with vendors, making strategic alignment, contract flexibility, and robust service delivery the hallmarks of successful rental propositions.
How rapid technological advances, decentralized care models, and service innovation are transforming rental propositions and operational priorities across the healthcare value chain
Fundamental shifts are redefining the competitive dynamics of the rental landscape, as technology convergence, care decentralization, and service innovation intersect to create new opportunity sets. Advances in portable diagnostic imaging and remote monitoring permit high‑acuity care to move closer to the patient, which in turn drives demand for short‑term and on‑demand rental solutions that support episodic surges and pilot programs. Simultaneously, the maturation of robotics and minimally invasive surgical platforms is increasing uptake of rental models for clinics and ambulatory surgery centers that lack the capital to acquire cutting‑edge systems outright.
Operationally, supply chain resilience and asset utilization analytics are becoming critical differentiators. Rental operators that deploy predictive maintenance and real‑time telemetry can reduce downtime, optimize redeployment, and demonstrate measurable service levels. Meanwhile, reimbursement and care delivery policy changes continue to influence where and how services are consumed, prompting rental providers to refine value propositions for home care, outpatient diagnostics, and cross‑institutional sharing programs. These transformative shifts emphasize a move from simple equipment leasing to integrated solutions that bundle training, asset management, and clinical outcomes support.
The 2025 tariff environment and its operational and strategic reverberations across procurement, contracting, and supply chain resilience for rental operators and providers
The introduction of tariffs in 2025 has introduced a layer of complexity that ripples across procurement, pricing, and supply chain planning for rental operators and healthcare providers alike. Increased import costs for components and finished devices influence acquisition strategies, encouraging some providers to extend equipment lifecycle through enhanced maintenance and to prioritize rental arrangements that shift capital exposure. As a result, rental firms are recalibrating procurement pipelines, renegotiating supplier terms, and exploring alternative sourcing to preserve margin and maintain competitive pricing structures.
In response to tariff‑driven cost pressures, many industry participants have accelerated localization efforts and supplier diversification to reduce exposure to trade policy volatility. Contract design has adapted to include more explicit clauses addressing customs, duties, and pass‑through costs, thereby improving transparency for end users. Additionally, operators have invested in inventory buffering and forward procurement where feasible to hedge short‑term price shocks. Collectively, these adjustments reflect a pragmatic approach to managing geopolitical risk, maintaining service continuity, and supporting provider demand in an environment where external policy factors can materially influence total cost of ownership and operational planning.
In‑depth segmentation insights that map equipment categories, end‑user behaviors, rental durations, modes of delivery, and clinical applications to rental strategy and service design
Segmentation by equipment type highlights a broad spectrum of clinical needs and service complexities, with Diagnostic Imaging encompassing CT, MRI, Nuclear Imaging, Ultrasound, and X‑Ray systems that demand high capital intensity, regulatory scrutiny, and specialist servicing; Monitoring Equipment covering Cardiac Monitoring, Fetal Monitoring, and Vital Signs Monitoring that require continual connectivity and data integration; Surgical Equipment spanning Endoscopy, Lasers, and Robotic platforms that combine precision hardware with consumable and software ecosystems; and Therapeutic Equipment including Dialysis, Infusion Pumps, and Respiratory devices where safety, consumable supply chains, and infection control protocols are paramount. Each equipment category carries distinct maintenance cadences, spare parts profiles, and training needs, which influence rental pricing models, contract lengths, and value‑added service offerings.
End‑user segmentation reveals differentiated demand patterns across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, clinics, diagnostic centers, and home care. Hospitals often seek long‑term arrangements with comprehensive service level agreements to support continuous care, while ambulatory surgery centers and diagnostic centers prioritize access to specialized platforms for procedural throughput without large capital commitments. Clinics and home care environments require rental options that emphasize portability, ease of use, and simplified maintenance. Rental duration considerations-long term versus short term-shape asset management strategies and redeployment logistics, with long‑term rentals aligning with predictable needs and short‑term rentals addressing seasonal surges, capacity spikes, or pilot testing. The mode of rental, whether off‑premise or on‑premise, further informs responsibilities for installation, service, and regulatory compliance. Finally, application areas such as Cardiology, Neurology, Oncology, and Orthopedics influence both the technical specifications of equipment and the ancillary services required to ensure clinical efficacy, thereby guiding how rental operators package solutions for specialized care pathways.
Regional dynamics shaping rental demand and operational models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific with implications for service design and compliance
Regional dynamics significantly influence demand drivers, regulatory environments, and operational models across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia‑Pacific regions. In the Americas, providers increasingly prioritize flexible capital deployment and value‑based arrangements, driving demand for rental models that support rapid adoption of diagnostic and monitoring technologies while preserving balance sheet flexibility. This region also sees a high emphasis on service reliability and integrated maintenance programs to support large hospital networks and ambulatory chains.
Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, the regulatory heterogeneity and varying reimbursement landscapes create opportunities for rental operators to tailor offerings to national priorities, from centralized procurement systems to private healthcare networks. Compliance, device reprocessing standards, and cross‑border logistics are prominent considerations. In the Asia‑Pacific region, rapid infrastructure investment, expanding private care, and an emphasis on decentralized diagnostics are accelerating adoption of rental solutions, particularly for high‑value imaging and surgical technologies. Operators active in these regions are adapting business models to accommodate differences in capital access, clinical staffing, and logistical complexity, while leveraging digital platforms to scale asset management and remote support.
How leading rental companies are differentiating through service ecosystems, predictive maintenance, and strategic partnerships to secure provider trust and operational scale
Competitive positioning in the rental landscape is increasingly determined by capabilities beyond equipment inventory, including logistics networks, clinical training services, digital asset management, and value‑added maintenance. Leading companies are investing in telemetry and predictive maintenance tools to reduce downtime and to provide verifiable performance metrics to clients. Strategic partnerships with device manufacturers, healthcare systems, and financing partners are emerging as critical levers for accessing advanced technologies and for co‑developing bundled solutions that align with provider workflows.
Moreover, some operators are differentiating through specialized clinical advisory services that help clients integrate rented equipment into care pathways and demonstrate clinical value. Others focus on operational excellence, scaling rapid deployment capabilities and standardized reprocessing workflows to serve high‑volume outpatient and home care segments. Mergers, strategic alliances, and service partnerships are common as firms seek to broaden geographic reach and deepen technical expertise. Ultimately, firms that combine robust service ecosystems with transparent contracting and strong compliance practices will be best positioned to capture demand from systems prioritizing uptime, safety, and predictable lifecycle costs.
Actionable recommendations for rental operators to invest in digital service delivery, supply chain resilience, clinical partnerships, and flexible contracting to drive sustained growth
Industry leaders should prioritize a blend of service innovation, supply chain agility, and close alignment with clinical workflows to remain competitive and resilient. Operators must invest in digital capabilities that enable remote monitoring, predictive maintenance, and streamlined scheduling, thereby improving asset uptime and demonstrating tangible operational value to clients. Equally important is the development of flexible contract structures that accommodate varying rental durations, usage patterns, and compliance requirements for different end users.
Supply chain diversification and localized spare parts networks will reduce exposure to tariff‑driven disruptions and accelerate response times. Leaders should also formalize clinical partnerships that provide co‑development opportunities, training programs, and outcome measurement frameworks, which in turn create sticky customer relationships. Finally, transparency in pricing, clear allocation of service responsibilities between providers and operators, and robust post‑rental reprocessing protocols will strengthen trust with procurement teams. By executing on these priorities, companies can convert transactional interactions into strategic partnerships that support long‑term adoption of rental solutions.
A rigorous mixed‑methods research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, regulatory analysis, and comparative scenario planning to derive actionable industry insights
The research underpinning this analysis combines primary interviews with procurement executives, rental operators, clinical leaders, and supply chain specialists, supplemented by systematic secondary review of regulatory frameworks, device standards, and observable procurement trends. Primary engagements focused on operational practices, service level expectations, and decision criteria for rental adoption, while secondary materials provided context on device categories, interoperability requirements, and regional regulatory variation. Data collection emphasized qualitative insights into contract design, maintenance workflows, and the interplay between clinical needs and rental service features.
Analytical approaches included thematic synthesis of interview findings, cross‑regional comparative analysis, and scenario planning to explore how policy shifts and technological trends could alter operational priorities. Care was taken to triangulate perspectives across stakeholders to produce balanced conclusions. Throughout the methodology, ethical considerations and data confidentiality were maintained, and sources were evaluated for relevance and recency to ensure the analysis reflects contemporary industry dynamics and practical implications for providers and rental operators.
A concise conclusion synthesizing how strategic service innovation, supply chain resilience, and clinical alignment will determine leadership in the evolving rental landscape
In summary, the medical equipment rental sector is transitioning from a tactical financing alternative to a strategic supply model that supports clinical innovation, operational flexibility, and risk mitigation. The convergence of portable technologies, heightened expectations for service quality, and evolving procurement practices creates a fertile environment for rental operators that can deliver integrated solutions, demonstrate reliability, and align contracts with clinical and financial objectives. At the same time, external factors such as trade policy, regional regulatory diversity, and shifting care delivery models will continue to shape operational priorities and service design choices.
Providers and rental firms that proactively invest in digital service capabilities, diversify supply chains, and cultivate clinical partnerships will be better equipped to capture emerging opportunities and to withstand policy and market headwinds. The sector’s trajectory favors operators who view rentals as platforms for service innovation rather than mere asset transactions, thus enabling sustained collaboration with healthcare systems seeking to enhance access to advanced care while managing capital and operational constraints.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid expansion of home healthcare rental portfolios with IoT monitoring devices
- 5.2. Rising popularity of subscription-based portable ultrasound rentals in rural clinics
- 5.3. Integration of AI diagnostics in rented imaging equipment for enhanced clinical insights
- 5.4. Increasing emphasis on HIPAA compliant sterilization practices for rented medical devices
- 5.5. Surge in demand for emergency response rental kits including portable ventilators and PPE
- 5.6. Adoption of data-driven predictive maintenance services for high-value rental equipment fleets
- 5.7. Expansion of digital marketplaces enabling on-demand medical equipment rentals with seamless logistics
- 5.8. Growing focus on eco-friendly reusable device rentals with advanced green sterilization processes
- 5.9. Customizable rehabilitation equipment rental solutions catering to post-acute care at home
- 5.10. Emerging trend of wearable health tech rental bundles integrated with remote patient monitoring platforms
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Equipment Type
- 8.1. Diagnostic Imaging
- 8.1.1. CT
- 8.1.2. MRI
- 8.1.3. Nuclear Imaging
- 8.1.4. Ultrasound
- 8.1.5. X-Ray
- 8.2. Monitoring Equipment
- 8.2.1. Cardiac Monitoring
- 8.2.2. Fetal Monitoring
- 8.2.3. Vital Signs Monitoring
- 8.3. Surgical Equipment
- 8.3.1. Endoscopy
- 8.3.2. Lasers
- 8.3.3. Robotic
- 8.4. Therapeutic Equipment
- 8.4.1. Dialysis
- 8.4.2. Infusion Pumps
- 8.4.3. Respiratory
- 9. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Rental Duration
- 9.1. Long Term
- 9.2. Short Term
- 10. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Mode Of Rental
- 10.1. Off Premise
- 10.2. On Premise
- 11. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by End-User
- 11.1. Ambulatory Surgery Centers
- 11.2. Clinics
- 11.3. Diagnostic Centers
- 11.4. Home Care
- 11.5. Hospitals
- 12. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Application
- 12.1. Cardiology
- 12.2. Neurology
- 12.3. Oncology
- 12.4. Orthopedics
- 13. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Medical Equipment Rental Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Amedisys, Inc.
- 16.3.2. Arjo AB
- 16.3.3. Baxter International Inc.
- 16.3.4. Drive DeVilbiss Healthcare, LLC
- 16.3.5. Invacare Corporation
- 16.3.6. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Linde PLC
- 16.3.8. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
- 16.3.9. Nunn's Home Medical Equipment
- 16.3.10. Patterson Companies, Inc.
- 16.3.11. Portea Medical Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Prime Healers
- 16.3.13. Probo Medical Ltd
- 16.3.14. Rotech Healthcare, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
