Meat Packaging Market by Packaging Type (Case Ready, Modified Atmosphere Packaging, Overwrap), Material (Glass, Metal, Paper And Paperboard), Meat Type, Technology, Packaging Component, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Meat Packaging Market was valued at USD 11.16 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 11.84 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.07%, reaching USD 17.88 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction that frames the current meat packaging environment amid rising safety expectations, sustainability demands, and supply chain complexity
The contemporary meat packaging environment sits at the intersection of food safety, environmental responsibility, and rapidly evolving consumer expectation. Recent advances in materials science and packaging processes have expanded options for preserving freshness while enabling more sustainable end-of-life outcomes, and producers face growing demand for transparency across the entire supply chain. At the same time, regulatory scrutiny on labeling, waste management, and sanitary controls has tightened, pressing manufacturers and retailers to reassess packaging strategies across product types and distribution channels.
As market participants navigate these converging pressures, strategic choices about material selection, component design, and technology deployment have immediate implications for shelf life, cost, and brand positioning. Companies that align packaging functionality with logistics realities and consumer preferences will retain competitive advantage, while those that treat packaging as a purely operational input risk missed opportunities for differentiation and efficiency gains. Consequently, this executive summary outlines the structural shifts, segmentation insights, trade impacts, regional dynamics, and recommended actions that leaders should prioritize to build resilience and capture value across the meat packaging chain.
An in-depth look at the transformative shifts reshaping meat packaging driven by sustainability priorities, automation, and omnichannel distribution pressures
The landscape for meat packaging is undergoing transformative shifts driven by sustainability imperatives, technological maturation, and channel fragmentation. Sustainability is no longer an optional narrative; it governs procurement, design criteria, and retail acceptance. Materials innovation-such as advances in recyclable films and compostable substrates-has progressed alongside improved barrier technologies, enabling longer shelf life without resorting to heavier or less sustainable options. Simultaneously, technology adoption in packaging operations is moving beyond pilot stages: automation in thermoforming, precision extrusion, and injection molding are improving throughput and reducing waste.
Channel fragmentation is causing packaging specifications to diversify. The growth of direct-to-consumer models and e-commerce platforms has altered protective and presentation requirements, while food service and industrial users continue to demand large-format and robust packaging solutions for logistics efficiency. Regulatory and trade policy adjustments are also reshaping sourcing strategies, prompting firms to reassess supplier footprints and materials portfolios. Taken together, these shifts compel firms to integrate sustainability, automation, and channel-aware design into a coherent packaging strategy that supports both product integrity and brand objectives.
A clear analysis of the cumulative impacts of recent United States tariff actions on procurement strategies, materials engineering, and logistics practices in meat packaging
Tariff changes and trade policy adjustments in the United States have exerted a cumulative influence on the meat packaging value chain, prompting strategic responses across sourcing, materials engineering, and logistics. When tariffs increase on imported inputs such as metals, certain plastics, or specialized barrier films, purchasing teams face immediate cost pressure that often triggers a reassessment of supplier portfolios. In practice, many organizations respond by diversifying sources, advancing qualification of domestic suppliers, or accepting higher inventory levels to smooth price volatility. These operational reactions reduce near-term disruption but require capital and managerial attention to implement effectively.
Beyond immediate procurement consequences, tariff-induced cost differentials accelerate innovation in material substitution and process efficiency. Packaging engineers intensify efforts to optimize film laminations, revise tray design, and reduce component count to lower material intensity. Logistics managers also reconfigure freight strategies, increasingly favoring regional distribution centers and vendor-managed inventory to limit cross-border exposures. At the commercial interface, companies balance margin preservation with consumer pricing, often absorbing part of the cost shift while prioritizing premium or value tiers differently. Collectively, these dynamics underscore the importance of scenario planning and agile supplier relationships to maintain continuity and protect product integrity under evolving trade conditions.
Deep segmentation insights that clarify how packaging type, materials, end users, distribution channels, meat types, technologies, and components shape strategic choices and value drivers
Segmentation analysis reveals distinct strategic imperatives across packaging type, material, end user, distribution channel, meat type, technology, and packaging component. Based on packaging type, attention must differentiate between Case Ready formats, Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP), Overwrap, Skin Packaging, and Vacuum Packaging because each presents unique barrier, sealing, and presentation requirements. Based on material, choices among Glass, Metal, Paper And Paperboard, and Plastic drive recyclability pathways, barrier performance, and cost profiles, and decisions here determine downstream waste management and regulatory compliance approaches. Based on end user, Food Service, Industrial, and Retail customers impose different scale, labeling, and handling demands that influence package design and procurement cycles.
Based on distribution channel, Online and Physical Stores require distinct packaging strategies: the Online channel further divides into Direct To Consumer and E-Commerce Platforms with added protective needs for postal transit, while Physical Stores subdivide into Convenience Stores, Hypermarkets And Supermarkets, and Specialty Stores where merchandising and shelf-appeal critically affect packaging format. Based on meat type, Fresh Meat and Processed Meat call for divergent barrier systems and shelf-life strategies. Based on technology, the operational profiles and capital needs vary across Extrusion, Injection Molding, and Thermoforming, each enabling different form factors and throughput. Based on packaging component, Containers, Films, Lids, and Trays represent focal points for material reduction, recycling design, and supplier collaboration. These layered segmentations inform tailored product development, capital allocation, and channel-specific execution plans.
Key regional perspectives explaining how distinct regulatory regimes, consumer behaviors, and manufacturing capabilities influence meat packaging priorities across global markets
Regional dynamics shape resource availability, regulatory expectations, and consumer preferences across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, and each region presents distinct implications for packaging strategy. In the Americas, close proximity to large retail networks and growing demand for convenience formats intensifies focus on MAP and overwrap solutions that emphasize freshness and shelf appeal, while rising investment in recyclable plastics and closed-loop programs informs material choices and supplier partnerships.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent regulations on recyclability and extended producer responsibility elevate the importance of design-for-recycling and material innovation, and supply chains increasingly embed traceability requirements to meet both regulatory and consumer scrutiny. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, diversified retail formats, and a strong manufacturing base position the region as both a production hub and a dynamic market for novel packaging formats; here, low-cost manufacturing is complemented by fast adoption of automation and flexible packaging technologies. Across regions, firms must calibrate sourcing, technology deployment, and compliance approaches to local logistics realities and evolving policy frameworks, while leveraging regional strengths to optimize global supply footprints.
Essential insights into competitive dynamics showing how specialization, partnerships, and technology leadership determine market positioning and value capture in meat packaging
Competitive dynamics among leading firms reflect a mix of specialization, vertical integration, and strategic collaboration, and companies continue to differentiate through technology, sustainability, and service offerings. Some players concentrate on advanced barrier solutions and MAP systems to extend product integrity, while others emphasize recyclable or compostable materials and lifecycle analysis to meet retail and regulatory demands. Collaboration between packaging suppliers and meat processors has become more common, with joint pilots that evaluate novel laminates, tray redesigns, and automated sealing lines to reduce waste and improve throughput.
Strategic partnerships with logistics providers and retail customers are also material to success; firms that can offer an integrated solution covering materials selection, production equipment, and distribution-ready packaging achieve faster adoption. At the same time, mid-sized suppliers that specialize in components such as films, lids, or thermoformed trays secure niche roles by offering responsive customization and rapid prototyping services. Across the competitive landscape, intellectual property around barrier technologies, proprietary process parameters for extrusion and injection, and proven recycling streams confer advantage, and cross-sector alliances accelerate commercialization of sustainable alternatives.
High-impact, actionable recommendations that industry leaders can implement to bolster resilience, accelerate sustainability, and capture operational efficiencies across packaging value chains
Industry leaders should take several concrete actions to fortify resilience, capture value, and accelerate sustainable innovation. First, diversify supplier networks and actively qualify domestic and regional alternatives to reduce exposure to tariff and freight shocks while ensuring consistent material quality. Second, prioritize material optimization programs that reduce component complexity and weight while preserving barrier performance; such programs should integrate ring-fenced R&D budgets and cross-functional trials with procurement, operations, and marketing stakeholders. Third, invest selectively in automation across extrusion, injection molding, and thermoforming to balance throughput improvements with labor productivity and waste reduction metrics.
Fourth, create channel-specific packaging playbooks that reconcile the divergent needs of direct-to-consumer, e-commerce platforms, convenience outlets, supermarkets, and specialty stores, aligning protective features with merchandising priorities. Fifth, accelerate circularity initiatives by validating recycling streams, labeling for end-of-life sorting, and collaborating with waste management partners to ensure real-world recyclability. Sixth, strengthen trade and scenario planning capabilities to model tariff outcomes, inform pricing strategies, and prepare contingency sourcing plans. By implementing these actions in sequence and monitoring progress through measurable KPIs, organizations can convert strategic intent into operational advantage and sustained commercial performance.
A transparent mixed-methods research methodology detailing primary interviews, laboratory validation, secondary source triangulation, and scenario testing to ensure actionable insights
This research synthesized evidence through a mixed-methods approach combining primary inquiry, laboratory evaluation, and secondary data validation to yield robust and actionable insights. Primary research included structured interviews with packaging engineers, procurement leaders, retail category managers, and logistics specialists to capture firsthand perspectives on materials performance, capital investment priorities, and channel-specific requirements. Laboratory evaluation of packaging prototypes and barrier properties supplemented these interviews to validate functional claims around shelf life, seal integrity, and material compatibility.
Secondary validation drew on publicly available regulatory documents, industry association publications, trade statistics, and company disclosures to map regional policy landscapes and supplier capabilities. Data triangulation ensured that qualitative inputs aligned with observed operational practices and documented regulatory constraints. The segmentation framework was applied iteratively, testing assumptions across packaging type, material, end user, distribution channel, meat type, technology, and component to identify consistent patterns. Where uncertainties remained, scenario analysis and sensitivity checks clarified plausible operational responses and strategic priorities for practitioners.
A concise concluding synthesis highlighting the critical intersection of sustainability, technology, and channel strategy that leaders must act upon to secure competitive advantage
In summary, the meat packaging domain is at an inflection point where sustainability, technology, and shifting channel dynamics intersect to create both challenges and opportunities. Companies that integrate materials innovation with process automation and channel-aware design will protect product integrity while unlocking differentiation. Trade policy fluctuations and tariff pressures underscore the need for agile procurement and scenario planning, and regional dynamics demand tailored approaches to regulation, logistics, and consumer preference.
Moving forward, success hinges on disciplined execution: rigorous supplier diversification, prioritized investment in high-impact packaging technologies, and targeted circularity programs. When organizations pair these operational steps with deeper collaboration across the value chain-between packaging suppliers, processors, retailers, and logistics partners-they create pathways to improved resilience and stronger commercial outcomes. By adopting the recommendations outlined here, leaders can position their organizations to deliver safe, sustainable, and cost-effective packaging solutions that meet the evolving needs of customers and regulators alike.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction that frames the current meat packaging environment amid rising safety expectations, sustainability demands, and supply chain complexity
The contemporary meat packaging environment sits at the intersection of food safety, environmental responsibility, and rapidly evolving consumer expectation. Recent advances in materials science and packaging processes have expanded options for preserving freshness while enabling more sustainable end-of-life outcomes, and producers face growing demand for transparency across the entire supply chain. At the same time, regulatory scrutiny on labeling, waste management, and sanitary controls has tightened, pressing manufacturers and retailers to reassess packaging strategies across product types and distribution channels.
As market participants navigate these converging pressures, strategic choices about material selection, component design, and technology deployment have immediate implications for shelf life, cost, and brand positioning. Companies that align packaging functionality with logistics realities and consumer preferences will retain competitive advantage, while those that treat packaging as a purely operational input risk missed opportunities for differentiation and efficiency gains. Consequently, this executive summary outlines the structural shifts, segmentation insights, trade impacts, regional dynamics, and recommended actions that leaders should prioritize to build resilience and capture value across the meat packaging chain.
An in-depth look at the transformative shifts reshaping meat packaging driven by sustainability priorities, automation, and omnichannel distribution pressures
The landscape for meat packaging is undergoing transformative shifts driven by sustainability imperatives, technological maturation, and channel fragmentation. Sustainability is no longer an optional narrative; it governs procurement, design criteria, and retail acceptance. Materials innovation-such as advances in recyclable films and compostable substrates-has progressed alongside improved barrier technologies, enabling longer shelf life without resorting to heavier or less sustainable options. Simultaneously, technology adoption in packaging operations is moving beyond pilot stages: automation in thermoforming, precision extrusion, and injection molding are improving throughput and reducing waste.
Channel fragmentation is causing packaging specifications to diversify. The growth of direct-to-consumer models and e-commerce platforms has altered protective and presentation requirements, while food service and industrial users continue to demand large-format and robust packaging solutions for logistics efficiency. Regulatory and trade policy adjustments are also reshaping sourcing strategies, prompting firms to reassess supplier footprints and materials portfolios. Taken together, these shifts compel firms to integrate sustainability, automation, and channel-aware design into a coherent packaging strategy that supports both product integrity and brand objectives.
A clear analysis of the cumulative impacts of recent United States tariff actions on procurement strategies, materials engineering, and logistics practices in meat packaging
Tariff changes and trade policy adjustments in the United States have exerted a cumulative influence on the meat packaging value chain, prompting strategic responses across sourcing, materials engineering, and logistics. When tariffs increase on imported inputs such as metals, certain plastics, or specialized barrier films, purchasing teams face immediate cost pressure that often triggers a reassessment of supplier portfolios. In practice, many organizations respond by diversifying sources, advancing qualification of domestic suppliers, or accepting higher inventory levels to smooth price volatility. These operational reactions reduce near-term disruption but require capital and managerial attention to implement effectively.
Beyond immediate procurement consequences, tariff-induced cost differentials accelerate innovation in material substitution and process efficiency. Packaging engineers intensify efforts to optimize film laminations, revise tray design, and reduce component count to lower material intensity. Logistics managers also reconfigure freight strategies, increasingly favoring regional distribution centers and vendor-managed inventory to limit cross-border exposures. At the commercial interface, companies balance margin preservation with consumer pricing, often absorbing part of the cost shift while prioritizing premium or value tiers differently. Collectively, these dynamics underscore the importance of scenario planning and agile supplier relationships to maintain continuity and protect product integrity under evolving trade conditions.
Deep segmentation insights that clarify how packaging type, materials, end users, distribution channels, meat types, technologies, and components shape strategic choices and value drivers
Segmentation analysis reveals distinct strategic imperatives across packaging type, material, end user, distribution channel, meat type, technology, and packaging component. Based on packaging type, attention must differentiate between Case Ready formats, Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP), Overwrap, Skin Packaging, and Vacuum Packaging because each presents unique barrier, sealing, and presentation requirements. Based on material, choices among Glass, Metal, Paper And Paperboard, and Plastic drive recyclability pathways, barrier performance, and cost profiles, and decisions here determine downstream waste management and regulatory compliance approaches. Based on end user, Food Service, Industrial, and Retail customers impose different scale, labeling, and handling demands that influence package design and procurement cycles.
Based on distribution channel, Online and Physical Stores require distinct packaging strategies: the Online channel further divides into Direct To Consumer and E-Commerce Platforms with added protective needs for postal transit, while Physical Stores subdivide into Convenience Stores, Hypermarkets And Supermarkets, and Specialty Stores where merchandising and shelf-appeal critically affect packaging format. Based on meat type, Fresh Meat and Processed Meat call for divergent barrier systems and shelf-life strategies. Based on technology, the operational profiles and capital needs vary across Extrusion, Injection Molding, and Thermoforming, each enabling different form factors and throughput. Based on packaging component, Containers, Films, Lids, and Trays represent focal points for material reduction, recycling design, and supplier collaboration. These layered segmentations inform tailored product development, capital allocation, and channel-specific execution plans.
Key regional perspectives explaining how distinct regulatory regimes, consumer behaviors, and manufacturing capabilities influence meat packaging priorities across global markets
Regional dynamics shape resource availability, regulatory expectations, and consumer preferences across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, and each region presents distinct implications for packaging strategy. In the Americas, close proximity to large retail networks and growing demand for convenience formats intensifies focus on MAP and overwrap solutions that emphasize freshness and shelf appeal, while rising investment in recyclable plastics and closed-loop programs informs material choices and supplier partnerships.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent regulations on recyclability and extended producer responsibility elevate the importance of design-for-recycling and material innovation, and supply chains increasingly embed traceability requirements to meet both regulatory and consumer scrutiny. In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, diversified retail formats, and a strong manufacturing base position the region as both a production hub and a dynamic market for novel packaging formats; here, low-cost manufacturing is complemented by fast adoption of automation and flexible packaging technologies. Across regions, firms must calibrate sourcing, technology deployment, and compliance approaches to local logistics realities and evolving policy frameworks, while leveraging regional strengths to optimize global supply footprints.
Essential insights into competitive dynamics showing how specialization, partnerships, and technology leadership determine market positioning and value capture in meat packaging
Competitive dynamics among leading firms reflect a mix of specialization, vertical integration, and strategic collaboration, and companies continue to differentiate through technology, sustainability, and service offerings. Some players concentrate on advanced barrier solutions and MAP systems to extend product integrity, while others emphasize recyclable or compostable materials and lifecycle analysis to meet retail and regulatory demands. Collaboration between packaging suppliers and meat processors has become more common, with joint pilots that evaluate novel laminates, tray redesigns, and automated sealing lines to reduce waste and improve throughput.
Strategic partnerships with logistics providers and retail customers are also material to success; firms that can offer an integrated solution covering materials selection, production equipment, and distribution-ready packaging achieve faster adoption. At the same time, mid-sized suppliers that specialize in components such as films, lids, or thermoformed trays secure niche roles by offering responsive customization and rapid prototyping services. Across the competitive landscape, intellectual property around barrier technologies, proprietary process parameters for extrusion and injection, and proven recycling streams confer advantage, and cross-sector alliances accelerate commercialization of sustainable alternatives.
High-impact, actionable recommendations that industry leaders can implement to bolster resilience, accelerate sustainability, and capture operational efficiencies across packaging value chains
Industry leaders should take several concrete actions to fortify resilience, capture value, and accelerate sustainable innovation. First, diversify supplier networks and actively qualify domestic and regional alternatives to reduce exposure to tariff and freight shocks while ensuring consistent material quality. Second, prioritize material optimization programs that reduce component complexity and weight while preserving barrier performance; such programs should integrate ring-fenced R&D budgets and cross-functional trials with procurement, operations, and marketing stakeholders. Third, invest selectively in automation across extrusion, injection molding, and thermoforming to balance throughput improvements with labor productivity and waste reduction metrics.
Fourth, create channel-specific packaging playbooks that reconcile the divergent needs of direct-to-consumer, e-commerce platforms, convenience outlets, supermarkets, and specialty stores, aligning protective features with merchandising priorities. Fifth, accelerate circularity initiatives by validating recycling streams, labeling for end-of-life sorting, and collaborating with waste management partners to ensure real-world recyclability. Sixth, strengthen trade and scenario planning capabilities to model tariff outcomes, inform pricing strategies, and prepare contingency sourcing plans. By implementing these actions in sequence and monitoring progress through measurable KPIs, organizations can convert strategic intent into operational advantage and sustained commercial performance.
A transparent mixed-methods research methodology detailing primary interviews, laboratory validation, secondary source triangulation, and scenario testing to ensure actionable insights
This research synthesized evidence through a mixed-methods approach combining primary inquiry, laboratory evaluation, and secondary data validation to yield robust and actionable insights. Primary research included structured interviews with packaging engineers, procurement leaders, retail category managers, and logistics specialists to capture firsthand perspectives on materials performance, capital investment priorities, and channel-specific requirements. Laboratory evaluation of packaging prototypes and barrier properties supplemented these interviews to validate functional claims around shelf life, seal integrity, and material compatibility.
Secondary validation drew on publicly available regulatory documents, industry association publications, trade statistics, and company disclosures to map regional policy landscapes and supplier capabilities. Data triangulation ensured that qualitative inputs aligned with observed operational practices and documented regulatory constraints. The segmentation framework was applied iteratively, testing assumptions across packaging type, material, end user, distribution channel, meat type, technology, and component to identify consistent patterns. Where uncertainties remained, scenario analysis and sensitivity checks clarified plausible operational responses and strategic priorities for practitioners.
A concise concluding synthesis highlighting the critical intersection of sustainability, technology, and channel strategy that leaders must act upon to secure competitive advantage
In summary, the meat packaging domain is at an inflection point where sustainability, technology, and shifting channel dynamics intersect to create both challenges and opportunities. Companies that integrate materials innovation with process automation and channel-aware design will protect product integrity while unlocking differentiation. Trade policy fluctuations and tariff pressures underscore the need for agile procurement and scenario planning, and regional dynamics demand tailored approaches to regulation, logistics, and consumer preference.
Moving forward, success hinges on disciplined execution: rigorous supplier diversification, prioritized investment in high-impact packaging technologies, and targeted circularity programs. When organizations pair these operational steps with deeper collaboration across the value chain-between packaging suppliers, processors, retailers, and logistics partners-they create pathways to improved resilience and stronger commercial outcomes. By adopting the recommendations outlined here, leaders can position their organizations to deliver safe, sustainable, and cost-effective packaging solutions that meet the evolving needs of customers and regulators alike.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
189 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of biodegradable and compostable films for sustainable meat packaging
- 5.2. Implementation of active antimicrobial coatings to extend meat shelf life
- 5.3. Integration of blockchain and RFID for end-to-end meat traceability
- 5.4. Development of modified atmosphere packaging solutions for fresh meat
- 5.5. Growth of e-commerce optimized packaging for direct-to-consumer meat sales
- 5.6. Introduction of smart sensors and indicators for real-time meat freshness monitoring
- 5.7. Transition to recyclable mono-material packaging for easier meat package recycling
- 5.8. Use of digital printing technology for customizable meat packaging designs
- 5.9. Innovations in vacuum skin packaging to reduce food waste and improve shelf life
- 5.10. Incorporation of edible coatings to minimize plastic use in meat packaging
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Meat Packaging Market, by Packaging Type
- 8.1. Case Ready
- 8.2. Modified Atmosphere Packaging
- 8.3. Overwrap
- 8.4. Skin Packaging
- 8.5. Vacuum Packaging
- 9. Meat Packaging Market, by Material
- 9.1. Glass
- 9.2. Metal
- 9.3. Paper And Paperboard
- 9.4. Plastic
- 10. Meat Packaging Market, by Meat Type
- 10.1. Fresh Meat
- 10.2. Processed Meat
- 11. Meat Packaging Market, by Technology
- 11.1. Extrusion
- 11.2. Injection Molding
- 11.3. Thermoforming
- 12. Meat Packaging Market, by Packaging Component
- 12.1. Containers
- 12.2. Films
- 12.3. Lids
- 12.4. Trays
- 13. Meat Packaging Market, by End User
- 13.1. Food Service
- 13.2. Industrial
- 13.3. Retail
- 14. Meat Packaging Market, by Distribution Channel
- 14.1. Online
- 14.1.1. Direct To Consumer
- 14.1.2. E-Commerce Platforms
- 14.2. Physical Stores
- 14.2.1. Convenience Stores
- 14.2.2. Hypermarkets And Supermarkets
- 14.2.3. Specialty Stores
- 15. Meat Packaging Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. Meat Packaging Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. Meat Packaging Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 18.3. Competitive Analysis
- 18.3.1. Amcor PLC
- 18.3.2. Amerplast Ltd.
- 18.3.3. Berry Global Group, Inc.
- 18.3.4. Bio4Pack GmbH
- 18.3.5. Bolloré SE
- 18.3.6. Cascades Inc.
- 18.3.7. Coveris Management GmbH
- 18.3.8. DS Smith PLC
- 18.3.9. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 18.3.10. EasyPak LLC
- 18.3.11. Faerch A/S
- 18.3.12. Kureha Corporation
- 18.3.13. Mondi PLC
- 18.3.14. Pactiv Evergreen Inc.
- 18.3.15. Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.
- 18.3.16. Reynolds Group Limited
- 18.3.17. Sealed Air Corporation
- 18.3.18. Sealpac International BV
- 18.3.19. Smurfit Kappa Group PLC
- 18.3.20. Sonoco Products Company
- 18.3.21. SÜDPACK Holding GmbH
- 18.3.22. ULMA Group
- 18.3.23. Winpak Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
