Matting Agents Market by Type (Polymer-Based Matting Agents, Silica-Based Matting Agents, Wax-Based Matting Agents), Formulation (Powder, Solventborne, UV/EB), Application Area, End-Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Matting Agents Market was valued at USD 870.58 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 916.38 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.59%, reaching USD 1,345.68 million by 2032.
An authoritative framing of matting agent functionality, industrial relevance, and strategic implications for formulators and specification stakeholders
Matting agents play a pivotal role in defining the tactile and visual qualities of coatings, inks, and surface treatments by controlling gloss, texture, and light scattering. This introduction synthesizes the functional attributes and industrial relevance of matting chemistries, highlighting why they continue to be an indispensable component across diverse formulation platforms and end-use applications. While the science behind matting agents spans polymer, silica, and wax chemistries, their practical value is measured by the balance they strike between aesthetic performance and process compatibility, making them central to product differentiation in highly competitive markets.
The industry context has evolved as environmental regulations, customer expectations for surface aesthetics, and advances in coating technologies converge. Manufacturers and formulators are responding to shifting priorities in raw material selection and production methods, while downstream stakeholders in automotive, aerospace, construction, and textiles redefine specification criteria for durability, appearance, and sustainability. Consequently, material developers and procurement teams must reevaluate technical roadmaps and supplier relationships, ensuring that matting agent selection supports performance objectives without undermining manufacturability or regulatory compliance. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by focusing on functional attributes, supply-chain interactions, and cross-sector drivers that shape strategic decisions.
How emerging surface science, environmental compliance, and supply resilience are reshaping the development and adoption of next-generation matting chemistries
The landscape for matting agents is undergoing a set of transformative shifts driven by converging technological, regulatory, and end-user demand forces. Advances in surface science and particle engineering have enabled the design of matting additives with tighter particle size distributions and tailored surface chemistries, which deliver more predictable gloss control while minimizing trade-offs in mechanical performance. Simultaneously, the move toward low-VOC and sustainable coatings has accelerated innovation in waterborne and UV/EB-compatible matting solutions, creating new pathways for formulators to meet stringent environmental standards without sacrificing aesthetic quality.
Regulatory frameworks and supply-chain resilience considerations have also reshaped sourcing strategies and raw-material selection. Suppliers are investing in production processes that reduce impurities and process variability, while downstream manufacturers are prioritizing formulations that simplify application and curing steps. Market participants are increasingly integrating functional testing with life-cycle thinking, resulting in matting solutions that emphasize both performance and environmental profile. As a result, companies that combine advanced materials science with flexible production and robust compliance practices are best positioned to capture new opportunities created by these systemic shifts.
The operational ramifications of 2025 tariff measures on procurement strategies, formulation adaptability, and supply-chain resilience for matting chemistries
The tariff actions introduced by United States trade policy in 2025 have introduced new operational dynamics for global supply chains that touch raw materials, intermediate chemistries, and finished matting-agent formulations. Tariffs influence sourcing economics, alter the relative attractiveness of domestic versus international suppliers, and can accelerate re-shoring or near-shoring decisions among formulators seeking to stabilize input costs. In practice, these trade measures have encouraged end-users and manufacturers to reexamine sourcing strategies, prioritizing supplier diversification and contractual arrangements that provide greater price predictability and logistical resilience.
Beyond procurement strategy, tariffs can magnify the strategic importance of formulation flexibility. Companies that maintain multi-formulation capabilities-across Powder, Solventborne, UV/EB, and Waterborne technologies-are better equipped to pivot when cost structures or import constraints shift. Similarly, product portfolios that include Polymer-Based Matting Agents, Silica-Based Matting Agents, and Wax-Based Matting Agents allow formulators to adapt performance and cost trade-offs in response to supply disruptions. Transitioning to alternative raw material sources or adjusting formulations often requires investment in qualification and testing, creating near-term operational burdens but longer-term strategic advantages for firms that commit to adaptive sourcing and robust product validation programs.
Actionable segmentation intelligence linking chemistry classes, formulation platforms, application demands, and end-use industry requirements to strategic R&D and commercialization choices
Segment-driven insights reveal differentiated technical requirements and commercialization pathways that inform product development and go-to-market choices. When considering Type segmentation, Polymer-Based Matting Agents typically offer formulation flexibility and compatibility with a broad range of binders, whereas Silica-Based Matting Agents can provide superior abrasion resistance and consistent matte levels; Wax-Based Matting Agents contribute unique surface lubricity and soft-touch textures but may require specific processing controls. These differences affect R&D prioritization and downstream performance validation, with each class demanding tailored characterizations of particle morphology, surface treatment, and interaction with binders.
Formulation segmentation underscores the importance of processing and application constraints. Powder systems often serve specialist industrial coatings where solvent minimization and high-solids performance matter, Solventborne routes remain relevant where substrate wetting and rapid film formation are critical, UV/EB formulations demand matting chemistries compatible with rapid cure kinetics and photoinitiation systems, and Waterborne technologies are now focal in markets prioritizing environmental compliance. Application-area segmentation-across Architectural Coating, Industrial Coating, Leather Coating, Printing Inks, and Wood Coating-reveals unique performance matrices tied to substrate, abrasion exposure, and desired aesthetics. Finally, end-use industry segmentation that includes Aerospace, Automotive, Construction, and Textiles highlights varying certification, durability, and safety requirements that shape matting agent selection and supplier qualification. Taken together, these segmentation lenses guide resource allocation for R&D, quality assurance, and sales planning, and they help identify where incremental innovation will deliver the greatest commercial payoff.
Regional dynamics and compliance imperatives that shape supply-chain choices, formulation preference, and commercialization approaches across global matting markets
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on regulatory expectations, raw-material availability, and demand patterns for matting agents. In the Americas, customer emphasis on rapid time-to-market and industrial-scale production capacity steers demand toward formulations that balance robustness with regulatory compliance, while localized supply chains and investments in domestic processing capacity can mitigate exposure to global freight volatility. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent environmental standards and evolving sustainability frameworks incentivize adoption of lower-VOC waterborne systems and tightly regulated precursors, and the region's diverse market segments reward suppliers who can provide application-specific technical support and compliance documentation.
Asia-Pacific remains a focal point for raw-material manufacturing and high-volume coatings production, where rapid urbanization and construction activity sustain demand across architectural and industrial coatings applications; here, scalability, cost competitiveness, and close supplier integration are decisive. Across all regions, cross-border regulatory harmonization and international standards for safety and performance are increasingly relevant, prompting multinational formulators and suppliers to develop regionally tailored portfolios and to invest in certification and testing capabilities that meet the highest jurisdictional requirements. Consequently, regional strategy should combine global technical consistency with localized commercialization and compliance approaches.
How technological differentiation, technical service depth, and sustainability-focused supply-chain strategies define market leadership among matting agent providers
Competitive dynamics among leading suppliers reflect a blend of technical capability, scale of production, and depth of application engineering services. Top-performing companies differentiate through proprietary surface treatments, particle-engineering platforms, and an ability to match matting performance with secondary attributes such as abrasion resistance, chemical tolerance, and tactile feel. Equally important is the capacity to support formulators with technical service, including laboratory support for compatibility testing, accelerated weathering, and process optimization to ensure consistent performance across substrates and application methods.
Supply-chain resilience and sustainability credentials are also evolving into core differentiators. Firms that demonstrate transparent sourcing practices, traceability of feedstocks, and investments in lower-emission production technologies secure stronger consideration among environmentally conscious customers and procurement professionals. In parallel, businesses that develop modular product offerings-allowing quick swaps between polymeric, silica, and wax-based matting chemistries-can respond more rapidly to shifting regulatory constraints or application requirements. Partnership strategies, joint development agreements with coating formulators, and targeted acquisitions to fill capability gaps further define how leading companies build defensible positions and accelerate time-to-market for novel matting solutions.
Practical strategic moves for formulators and purchasers that combine R&D focus, diversified sourcing, application engineering, and sustainability to secure competitive advantage
Leaders in formulations and procurement should take decisive steps to translate market dynamics into competitive advantage. First, prioritize R&D investments that bridge polymer science and surface engineering to deliver matting agents optimized for low-VOC and rapid-cure systems; this focus reduces regulatory friction while expanding application compatibility. Next, institute multi-source procurement frameworks and qualification protocols that reduce single-point dependencies on critical precursors; by building validated alternate suppliers and regional production options, organizations can increase operational flexibility and protect margins against policy-driven trade shifts.
Additionally, embed application engineering into the commercial model by offering co-development services, in-line testing, and technical training to customers in Architectural Coating, Industrial Coating, Leather Coating, Printing Inks, and Wood Coating segments. Such engagement accelerates product adoption and deepens customer relationships. Finally, integrate sustainability metrics into product roadmaps and supplier scorecards, emphasizing lower-emission formulations, recycled content where feasible, and transparent lifecycle disclosures. These measures collectively enable organizations to reduce risk, enhance product differentiation, and align with the procurement and regulatory priorities that are shaping the competitive landscape.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, materials characterization, and policy analysis to deliver technically grounded commercial insights
This research combines qualitative expert interviews, materials characterization protocols, and a structured review of regulatory and trade policy developments to ensure robust and actionable insights. Primary interviews were conducted with formulators, procurement leaders, and technical experts across coatings, inks, and specialty finishing applications to capture practical challenges related to matting agent selection and qualification. Laboratory-based materials characterization focused on particle morphology, dispersion behavior in representative binder systems, and performance metrics such as gloss control, abrasion resistance, and compatibility with cure chemistries to validate functional claims and identify trade-offs.
Secondary inputs included an analysis of public regulatory frameworks, trade policy announcements, and technical literature to contextualize supply-chain and compliance implications. Synthesis of these inputs used a thematic coding approach to surface recurring risk factors, innovation levers, and commercialization barriers. Where applicable, case-based examples of supplier-formulator collaboration and supply-chain adaptation were used to illustrate practical mitigation strategies. The result is a methodology that blends hands-on technical validation with market and regulatory analysis to deliver insights that are both technically grounded and commercially relevant.
Concluding perspective on how integrated technical, procurement, and compliance strategies will convert matting agent selection into sustainable competitive differentiation
In closing, matting agents remain a strategically important class of additives whose selection affects aesthetics, durability, and manufacturability across multiple industries. The interplay between evolving surface engineering capabilities, regulatory constraints, and supply-chain pressures demands that manufacturers, formulators, and procurement teams adopt an integrated approach: invest in adaptable chemistries, diversify sourcing, and embed application-level support into commercial engagements. Those who align product development with the operational realities of coatings production and the compliance expectations of regionally diverse markets will be best positioned to capture incremental gains in product performance and customer loyalty.
Looking ahead, successful organizations will be those that treat matting agent strategy as a cross-functional priority-bringing together R&D, regulatory affairs, procurement, and application engineering to shorten validation cycles and accelerate commercialization. By doing so, they can transform matting chemistries from a functional necessity into a source of differentiation that supports premium positioning, sustainable product claims, and stronger end-customer relationships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative framing of matting agent functionality, industrial relevance, and strategic implications for formulators and specification stakeholders
Matting agents play a pivotal role in defining the tactile and visual qualities of coatings, inks, and surface treatments by controlling gloss, texture, and light scattering. This introduction synthesizes the functional attributes and industrial relevance of matting chemistries, highlighting why they continue to be an indispensable component across diverse formulation platforms and end-use applications. While the science behind matting agents spans polymer, silica, and wax chemistries, their practical value is measured by the balance they strike between aesthetic performance and process compatibility, making them central to product differentiation in highly competitive markets.
The industry context has evolved as environmental regulations, customer expectations for surface aesthetics, and advances in coating technologies converge. Manufacturers and formulators are responding to shifting priorities in raw material selection and production methods, while downstream stakeholders in automotive, aerospace, construction, and textiles redefine specification criteria for durability, appearance, and sustainability. Consequently, material developers and procurement teams must reevaluate technical roadmaps and supplier relationships, ensuring that matting agent selection supports performance objectives without undermining manufacturability or regulatory compliance. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by focusing on functional attributes, supply-chain interactions, and cross-sector drivers that shape strategic decisions.
How emerging surface science, environmental compliance, and supply resilience are reshaping the development and adoption of next-generation matting chemistries
The landscape for matting agents is undergoing a set of transformative shifts driven by converging technological, regulatory, and end-user demand forces. Advances in surface science and particle engineering have enabled the design of matting additives with tighter particle size distributions and tailored surface chemistries, which deliver more predictable gloss control while minimizing trade-offs in mechanical performance. Simultaneously, the move toward low-VOC and sustainable coatings has accelerated innovation in waterborne and UV/EB-compatible matting solutions, creating new pathways for formulators to meet stringent environmental standards without sacrificing aesthetic quality.
Regulatory frameworks and supply-chain resilience considerations have also reshaped sourcing strategies and raw-material selection. Suppliers are investing in production processes that reduce impurities and process variability, while downstream manufacturers are prioritizing formulations that simplify application and curing steps. Market participants are increasingly integrating functional testing with life-cycle thinking, resulting in matting solutions that emphasize both performance and environmental profile. As a result, companies that combine advanced materials science with flexible production and robust compliance practices are best positioned to capture new opportunities created by these systemic shifts.
The operational ramifications of 2025 tariff measures on procurement strategies, formulation adaptability, and supply-chain resilience for matting chemistries
The tariff actions introduced by United States trade policy in 2025 have introduced new operational dynamics for global supply chains that touch raw materials, intermediate chemistries, and finished matting-agent formulations. Tariffs influence sourcing economics, alter the relative attractiveness of domestic versus international suppliers, and can accelerate re-shoring or near-shoring decisions among formulators seeking to stabilize input costs. In practice, these trade measures have encouraged end-users and manufacturers to reexamine sourcing strategies, prioritizing supplier diversification and contractual arrangements that provide greater price predictability and logistical resilience.
Beyond procurement strategy, tariffs can magnify the strategic importance of formulation flexibility. Companies that maintain multi-formulation capabilities-across Powder, Solventborne, UV/EB, and Waterborne technologies-are better equipped to pivot when cost structures or import constraints shift. Similarly, product portfolios that include Polymer-Based Matting Agents, Silica-Based Matting Agents, and Wax-Based Matting Agents allow formulators to adapt performance and cost trade-offs in response to supply disruptions. Transitioning to alternative raw material sources or adjusting formulations often requires investment in qualification and testing, creating near-term operational burdens but longer-term strategic advantages for firms that commit to adaptive sourcing and robust product validation programs.
Actionable segmentation intelligence linking chemistry classes, formulation platforms, application demands, and end-use industry requirements to strategic R&D and commercialization choices
Segment-driven insights reveal differentiated technical requirements and commercialization pathways that inform product development and go-to-market choices. When considering Type segmentation, Polymer-Based Matting Agents typically offer formulation flexibility and compatibility with a broad range of binders, whereas Silica-Based Matting Agents can provide superior abrasion resistance and consistent matte levels; Wax-Based Matting Agents contribute unique surface lubricity and soft-touch textures but may require specific processing controls. These differences affect R&D prioritization and downstream performance validation, with each class demanding tailored characterizations of particle morphology, surface treatment, and interaction with binders.
Formulation segmentation underscores the importance of processing and application constraints. Powder systems often serve specialist industrial coatings where solvent minimization and high-solids performance matter, Solventborne routes remain relevant where substrate wetting and rapid film formation are critical, UV/EB formulations demand matting chemistries compatible with rapid cure kinetics and photoinitiation systems, and Waterborne technologies are now focal in markets prioritizing environmental compliance. Application-area segmentation-across Architectural Coating, Industrial Coating, Leather Coating, Printing Inks, and Wood Coating-reveals unique performance matrices tied to substrate, abrasion exposure, and desired aesthetics. Finally, end-use industry segmentation that includes Aerospace, Automotive, Construction, and Textiles highlights varying certification, durability, and safety requirements that shape matting agent selection and supplier qualification. Taken together, these segmentation lenses guide resource allocation for R&D, quality assurance, and sales planning, and they help identify where incremental innovation will deliver the greatest commercial payoff.
Regional dynamics and compliance imperatives that shape supply-chain choices, formulation preference, and commercialization approaches across global matting markets
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on regulatory expectations, raw-material availability, and demand patterns for matting agents. In the Americas, customer emphasis on rapid time-to-market and industrial-scale production capacity steers demand toward formulations that balance robustness with regulatory compliance, while localized supply chains and investments in domestic processing capacity can mitigate exposure to global freight volatility. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, stringent environmental standards and evolving sustainability frameworks incentivize adoption of lower-VOC waterborne systems and tightly regulated precursors, and the region's diverse market segments reward suppliers who can provide application-specific technical support and compliance documentation.
Asia-Pacific remains a focal point for raw-material manufacturing and high-volume coatings production, where rapid urbanization and construction activity sustain demand across architectural and industrial coatings applications; here, scalability, cost competitiveness, and close supplier integration are decisive. Across all regions, cross-border regulatory harmonization and international standards for safety and performance are increasingly relevant, prompting multinational formulators and suppliers to develop regionally tailored portfolios and to invest in certification and testing capabilities that meet the highest jurisdictional requirements. Consequently, regional strategy should combine global technical consistency with localized commercialization and compliance approaches.
How technological differentiation, technical service depth, and sustainability-focused supply-chain strategies define market leadership among matting agent providers
Competitive dynamics among leading suppliers reflect a blend of technical capability, scale of production, and depth of application engineering services. Top-performing companies differentiate through proprietary surface treatments, particle-engineering platforms, and an ability to match matting performance with secondary attributes such as abrasion resistance, chemical tolerance, and tactile feel. Equally important is the capacity to support formulators with technical service, including laboratory support for compatibility testing, accelerated weathering, and process optimization to ensure consistent performance across substrates and application methods.
Supply-chain resilience and sustainability credentials are also evolving into core differentiators. Firms that demonstrate transparent sourcing practices, traceability of feedstocks, and investments in lower-emission production technologies secure stronger consideration among environmentally conscious customers and procurement professionals. In parallel, businesses that develop modular product offerings-allowing quick swaps between polymeric, silica, and wax-based matting chemistries-can respond more rapidly to shifting regulatory constraints or application requirements. Partnership strategies, joint development agreements with coating formulators, and targeted acquisitions to fill capability gaps further define how leading companies build defensible positions and accelerate time-to-market for novel matting solutions.
Practical strategic moves for formulators and purchasers that combine R&D focus, diversified sourcing, application engineering, and sustainability to secure competitive advantage
Leaders in formulations and procurement should take decisive steps to translate market dynamics into competitive advantage. First, prioritize R&D investments that bridge polymer science and surface engineering to deliver matting agents optimized for low-VOC and rapid-cure systems; this focus reduces regulatory friction while expanding application compatibility. Next, institute multi-source procurement frameworks and qualification protocols that reduce single-point dependencies on critical precursors; by building validated alternate suppliers and regional production options, organizations can increase operational flexibility and protect margins against policy-driven trade shifts.
Additionally, embed application engineering into the commercial model by offering co-development services, in-line testing, and technical training to customers in Architectural Coating, Industrial Coating, Leather Coating, Printing Inks, and Wood Coating segments. Such engagement accelerates product adoption and deepens customer relationships. Finally, integrate sustainability metrics into product roadmaps and supplier scorecards, emphasizing lower-emission formulations, recycled content where feasible, and transparent lifecycle disclosures. These measures collectively enable organizations to reduce risk, enhance product differentiation, and align with the procurement and regulatory priorities that are shaping the competitive landscape.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, materials characterization, and policy analysis to deliver technically grounded commercial insights
This research combines qualitative expert interviews, materials characterization protocols, and a structured review of regulatory and trade policy developments to ensure robust and actionable insights. Primary interviews were conducted with formulators, procurement leaders, and technical experts across coatings, inks, and specialty finishing applications to capture practical challenges related to matting agent selection and qualification. Laboratory-based materials characterization focused on particle morphology, dispersion behavior in representative binder systems, and performance metrics such as gloss control, abrasion resistance, and compatibility with cure chemistries to validate functional claims and identify trade-offs.
Secondary inputs included an analysis of public regulatory frameworks, trade policy announcements, and technical literature to contextualize supply-chain and compliance implications. Synthesis of these inputs used a thematic coding approach to surface recurring risk factors, innovation levers, and commercialization barriers. Where applicable, case-based examples of supplier-formulator collaboration and supply-chain adaptation were used to illustrate practical mitigation strategies. The result is a methodology that blends hands-on technical validation with market and regulatory analysis to deliver insights that are both technically grounded and commercially relevant.
Concluding perspective on how integrated technical, procurement, and compliance strategies will convert matting agent selection into sustainable competitive differentiation
In closing, matting agents remain a strategically important class of additives whose selection affects aesthetics, durability, and manufacturability across multiple industries. The interplay between evolving surface engineering capabilities, regulatory constraints, and supply-chain pressures demands that manufacturers, formulators, and procurement teams adopt an integrated approach: invest in adaptable chemistries, diversify sourcing, and embed application-level support into commercial engagements. Those who align product development with the operational realities of coatings production and the compliance expectations of regionally diverse markets will be best positioned to capture incremental gains in product performance and customer loyalty.
Looking ahead, successful organizations will be those that treat matting agent strategy as a cross-functional priority-bringing together R&D, regulatory affairs, procurement, and application engineering to shorten validation cycles and accelerate commercialization. By doing so, they can transform matting chemistries from a functional necessity into a source of differentiation that supports premium positioning, sustainable product claims, and stronger end-customer relationships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
183 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Use of bio-based silica matting agents to meet sustainability and ecofriendly demands
- 5.2. Rising adoption of surface functionalized nanostructured agents for high performance durability in coatings
- 5.3. Development of waterborne matting formulations to comply with stringent VOC and emission regulations
- 5.4. Integration of UV-curable matting agents enabling rapid curing and improved scratch resistance in industrial coatings
- 5.5. Shift towards multi-functional matting additives combining antifoam and rheology control properties for efficiency gains in production
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Matting Agents Market, by Type
- 8.1. Polymer-Based Matting Agents
- 8.2. Silica-Based Matting Agents
- 8.3. Wax-Based Matting Agents
- 9. Matting Agents Market, by Formulation
- 9.1. Powder
- 9.2. Solventborne
- 9.3. UV/EB
- 9.4. Waterborne
- 10. Matting Agents Market, by Application Area
- 10.1. Architectural Coating
- 10.2. Industrial Coating
- 10.3. Leather Coating
- 10.4. Printing Inks
- 10.5. Wood Coating
- 11. Matting Agents Market, by End-Use Industry
- 11.1. Aerospace
- 11.2. Automotive
- 11.3. Construction
- 11.4. Textiles
- 12. Matting Agents Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Matting Agents Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Matting Agents Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Aalborz Chemical, LLC
- 15.3.2. Akzo Nobel N.V.
- 15.3.3. Anhui Kingcham New Materials Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.4. Arkema S.A.
- 15.3.5. Axalta Coating Systems, LLC
- 15.3.6. BASF SE
- 15.3.7. BCD Chemie GmbH
- 15.3.8. BioPowder by Schilling Ltd.
- 15.3.9. BYK-Chemie GmbH
- 15.3.10. Cabot Corporation
- 15.3.11. CHT Germany GmbH
- 15.3.12. Deuteron GmbH
- 15.3.13. Estron Chemical, Inc.
- 15.3.14. Evonik Industries AG
- 15.3.15. Fine Cause Co.,Ltd.
- 15.3.16. Goyen Chemical
- 15.3.17. Henan Minmetals East Industrial Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.18. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.19. Hubei Hoyonn Chemical Industry Co., Ltd
- 15.3.20. Imerys S.A.
- 15.3.21. ISF Group Limited
- 15.3.22. ISHIHARA SANGYO KAISHA, LTD.
- 15.3.23. J.M. Huber Corporation
- 15.3.24. Jinsha Precipitated Silica Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.25. Jinwei Chemical Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.26. Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corporation
- 15.3.27. MÜNZING Chemie GmbH
- 15.3.28. PPG Industries, Inc.
- 15.3.29. PQ Corporation
- 15.3.30. SINO SUNMAN INTERNATIONAL
- 15.3.31. Stahl Holdings B.V.
- 15.3.32. The Lubrizol Corporation
- 15.3.33. Thomas Swan & Co. Ltd.
- 15.3.34. W. R. Grace & Co.
- 15.3.35. Yantai Sunychem Int'l Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.36. Zhejiang Shuangcai New Materials Co., Ltd.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
