Maritime Distress & Safety System Market by System Type (Automatic Identification System (AIS), Digital Selective Calling (DSC), Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB)), Application (Collision Avoidance, Distress Alerting, Navigational Safety)
Description
The Maritime Distress & Safety System Market was valued at USD 34.03 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 37.20 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.30%, reaching USD 69.32 billion by 2032.
Positioning maritime distress and safety systems as strategic enablers of operational resilience and coordinated response across evolving seaborne ecosystems
The maritime domain has always demanded robust systems for signaling distress and maintaining navigational safety, yet recent operational, technological, and regulatory shifts have elevated these systems from compliance items to strategic enablers of resilience. This introduction frames maritime distress and safety systems as foundational layers that intersect with crew safety, port operations, search and rescue coordination, and national security mandates. By positioning these capabilities within the broader ecosystem of maritime operations, stakeholders can better appreciate how investments in equipment, connectivity, and shore-based monitoring translate into reduced incident response times and improved situational awareness.
Emerging use cases, including integrated collision avoidance workflows and multi-modal distress alerting across satellite and terrestrial links, are reshaping operational expectations. Consequently, shipowners, shipbuilders, classification societies, and regulators are re-evaluating equipment lifecycles, maintenance regimens, and interoperability requirements. This introduction establishes context for the subsequent sections by highlighting the interplay between technology, regulation, and operational practice that determines how distress and safety systems deliver measurable value across vessel types and maritime geographies.
How rapid advances in satellite connectivity, regulatory tightening, and system interoperability are reshaping safety expectations and operational requirements at sea
The landscape for maritime distress and safety systems is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in satellite communications, stricter regulatory frameworks, and the integration of data-driven decision support tools. Satellite constellations and lower-latency broadband services have expanded the reach of distress alerting beyond traditional shortwave and VHF bands, enabling higher-fidelity positional data and richer information payloads to accompany emergency signals. At the same time, regulatory authorities and international bodies continue to refine carriage and performance standards, prompting upgrades to both onboard hardware and shore-based monitoring infrastructures.
Technological convergence is catalyzing interoperability between systems historically treated as discrete. Automatic Identification Systems now routinely feed enhanced collision avoidance algorithms, while Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons and Search and Rescue Transponders integrate with digital alerting platforms to reduce false positives and accelerate resource allocation. Concurrently, cyber-physical risk management has emerged as a priority; stakeholders increasingly expect manufacturers and integrators to embed security-by-design practices. These shifts collectively increase the operational effectiveness of distress and safety solutions, but they also raise system integration, lifecycle management, and regulatory compliance requirements that operators must plan for proactively.
Assessing how recent trade measures and tariff adjustments have reshaped procurement strategies, supply chains, and localization approaches for maritime safety equipment
Tariff policies emanating from major trading partners, particularly adjustments to tariffs and trade measures implemented in recent policy cycles, have exerted measurable pressure on supply chains that underpin maritime safety equipment. Changes in import duties, classification of electronic components, and ancillary logistics surcharges have influenced procurement lead times and equipment sourcing decisions. These cumulative effects have prompted stakeholders to reassess vendor diversification strategies, inventory buffers, and localization of critical component assembly to mitigate exposure to abrupt cost escalations and shipping constraints.
The interplay between tariffs and supply-chain resilience has encouraged manufacturers and systems integrators to revisit their supplier networks and to pursue nearshoring opportunities where regulatory and labor environments permit. Procurement teams now weigh total-cost-of-ownership implications that include potential customs delays, compliance documentation overhead, and warranty support complexities across cross-border transactions. For operators and flag administrations, the net outcome has been a renewed emphasis on standardization and modularity to enable multi-source procurement without compromising interoperability. While tariffs have not altered the fundamental safety imperatives, they have accelerated strategic sourcing decisions, localized inventory policies, and collaborative frameworks between manufacturers and service providers to preserve timely equipment availability and maintain regulatory compliance.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that clarify differentiated adoption patterns, procurement drivers, and lifecycle requirements across system types and platform profiles
Segmentation-based insights reveal differentiated adoption patterns and procurement drivers across technology categories, use cases, vessel classes, and deployment modalities. Based on system type, solutions such as Automatic Identification System (AIS), Digital Selective Calling (DSC), Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB), Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), Long-Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT), Search and Rescue Transponder (SART), and Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) each present distinct integration, maintenance, and certification challenges that influence fleet-level implementation planning. For instance, AIS and DSC typically tie directly into navigational workflows and bridge team procedures, while EPIRB and SART remain critical for life-saving appliance compliance and search-and-rescue coordination.
Based on application, markets for Collision Avoidance, Distress Alerting, Navigational Safety, and Search And Rescue display divergent performance criteria and user expectations; collision avoidance is increasingly driven by real-time data fusion and predictive analytics, whereas distress alerting emphasizes reliability, redundancy, and cross-domain interoperability. Based on platform type, Commercial Vessels, Fishing Vessels, Leisure Craft, Military Vessels, and Passenger Vessels impose different regulatory, operational, and budgetary constraints that affect product selection, certification timelines, and lifecycle servicing. Based on deployment mode, Onboard Installation and Shore-Based Monitoring Systems form complementary layers where investments in shore-based analytics and monitoring can amplify onboard system effectiveness. Together, these segmentation lenses enable decision-makers to prioritize investments, tailor procurement specifications, and design maintenance programs aligned to vessel profile and mission-critical use cases.
How distinct regional regulatory frameworks, fleet compositions, and infrastructure investments are shaping procurement priorities and deployment strategies for maritime safety
Regional dynamics significantly influence regulatory frameworks, procurement preferences, and innovation pathways for maritime distress and safety systems. In the Americas, legacy fleets and busy coastal trade corridors create strong demand for retrofit solutions that meet national carriage requirements and support dense port traffic management. Stakeholders in this region often prioritize compatibility with existing port-state control regimes and operational readiness for domestic coastal search-and-rescue assets.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa region, a mix of stringent European regulatory standards, busy Mediterranean and North Sea shipping lanes, and emerging Gulf maritime investments create heterogeneous demand that favors advanced interoperability and rapid certification processes. Operators here balance stringent compliance expectations with accelerating offshore activity and strategic investments in port infrastructure. In Asia-Pacific, fast fleet renewal cycles, significant fishing and coastal passenger traffic, and proactive national programs to modernize maritime situational awareness drive demand for integrated solutions that combine onboard systems with shore-based monitoring. Across all regions, cross-border coordination, harmonized standards, and the capacity of local service ecosystems to deliver installation and maintenance support remain decisive factors in procurement and deployment decisions.
Competitive dynamics reveal how legacy manufacturers, agile integrators, and strategic alliances are redefining vendor selection and lifecycle support in maritime safety
The competitive landscape for maritime distress and safety systems is characterized by a mix of longstanding equipment manufacturers, emerging systems integrators, and specialized service providers that offer lifecycle support and data services. Established vendors tend to lead on certification pedigree, global service footprint, and interoperability with legacy shipboard systems, and they remain trusted partners for classification bodies and regulatory compliance. Newer entrants are often more agile in software-defined capabilities, cloud-enabled monitoring, and rapid prototyping of sensor and communication modules.
Partnerships and channel strategies have become critical differentiators: companies that can bundle hardware with shore-based analytics, predictive maintenance services, and streamlined certification support create higher switching costs and greater operational continuity for vessel operators. At the same time, strategic alliances between manufacturers and satellite connectivity providers have accelerated the integration of high-bandwidth distress reporting and enriched situational data. For procurement teams, vendor selection increasingly hinges on demonstrable service-level commitments, cybersecurity credentials, and the ability to support multi-vendor interoperability across the vessel lifecycle.
Practical and prioritized actions for leaders to strengthen procurement resilience, interoperability, cybersecurity, and regulatory engagement for maritime safety programs
Industry leaders should pursue a focused set of actions that align procurement, technology roadmaps, and regulatory engagement to accelerate resilience and operational readiness. First, adopt modular architecture principles for onboard systems to enable equipment interoperability and to simplify upgrades without full-system replacement. Embrace open standards and prioritize solutions with documented certification pathways to reduce procurement friction and to accelerate deployment across heterogeneous fleets.
Second, strengthen supply-chain resilience by diversifying component suppliers and by negotiating lead-time protections with tier-one vendors. This includes exploring regional assembly or stocking models to mitigate tariff-induced disruptions and customs delays. Third, invest in shore-based analytics and remote monitoring to extend the value of onboard equipment, enabling predictive maintenance and faster incident triage. Fourth, embed cybersecurity requirements into procurement specifications to protect distress and safety signals from disruption or spoofing, and require third-party security assessments as part of vendor qualification. Finally, engage proactively with regulatory bodies and classification societies to shape implementation guidance, validate interoperable approaches, and secure early approvals for innovative solutions, thereby reducing time-to-service and ensuring compliance continuity.
A rigorous mixed-method research approach combining expert interviews, standards analysis, and data triangulation to validate technical and regulatory insights for maritime safety
This research combines structured primary engagement with subject-matter experts and rigorous secondary-source validation to ensure comprehensive coverage of technical, regulatory, and operational considerations. Primary inputs included interviews with shipowners, classification society representatives, systems integrators, and search-and-rescue coordinators to capture real-world constraints around installation, certification, and operational use. These conversations informed a synthesis of stakeholder priorities, pain points, and implementation best practices.
Secondary research incorporated public regulatory materials, technical standards documentation, vendor white papers, and incident case studies to validate assumptions about system capabilities and interoperability. Data triangulation methods matched primary observations with secondary evidence to identify consistent trends and to flag areas of divergence that warrant further investigation. Throughout the study, methodological rigor emphasized transparency of assumptions, traceability of source material, and a conservative approach to interpreting policy changes, ensuring that recommendations reflect operational realities and maintain applicability across diverse vessel types and regional regulatory environments.
Synthesizing technological, regulatory, and operational imperatives into a practical pathway for resilient and integrated maritime distress and safety systems
In conclusion, maritime distress and safety systems are transitioning from regulatory compliance components toward integrated enablers of operational resilience, driven by advances in connectivity, data integration, and a heightened emphasis on supply-chain resilience. Stakeholders that adopt modular architectures, invest in shore-based analytics, and strengthen supplier diversification will be better positioned to maintain continuity of operations and accelerate compliance across changing regulatory environments. Additionally, embedding cybersecurity and interoperability requirements into procurement specifications will protect lifesaving functionality and ensure trust across multi-actor response ecosystems.
Looking ahead, the most effective programs will blend proven hardware reliability with evolving digital capabilities, coordinated through clear governance and proactive engagement with regulators and classification bodies. This balanced approach creates a practical pathway to improve incident response, reduce false alarms, and align vessel operators with modern expectations for maritime safety and security.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Positioning maritime distress and safety systems as strategic enablers of operational resilience and coordinated response across evolving seaborne ecosystems
The maritime domain has always demanded robust systems for signaling distress and maintaining navigational safety, yet recent operational, technological, and regulatory shifts have elevated these systems from compliance items to strategic enablers of resilience. This introduction frames maritime distress and safety systems as foundational layers that intersect with crew safety, port operations, search and rescue coordination, and national security mandates. By positioning these capabilities within the broader ecosystem of maritime operations, stakeholders can better appreciate how investments in equipment, connectivity, and shore-based monitoring translate into reduced incident response times and improved situational awareness.
Emerging use cases, including integrated collision avoidance workflows and multi-modal distress alerting across satellite and terrestrial links, are reshaping operational expectations. Consequently, shipowners, shipbuilders, classification societies, and regulators are re-evaluating equipment lifecycles, maintenance regimens, and interoperability requirements. This introduction establishes context for the subsequent sections by highlighting the interplay between technology, regulation, and operational practice that determines how distress and safety systems deliver measurable value across vessel types and maritime geographies.
How rapid advances in satellite connectivity, regulatory tightening, and system interoperability are reshaping safety expectations and operational requirements at sea
The landscape for maritime distress and safety systems is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in satellite communications, stricter regulatory frameworks, and the integration of data-driven decision support tools. Satellite constellations and lower-latency broadband services have expanded the reach of distress alerting beyond traditional shortwave and VHF bands, enabling higher-fidelity positional data and richer information payloads to accompany emergency signals. At the same time, regulatory authorities and international bodies continue to refine carriage and performance standards, prompting upgrades to both onboard hardware and shore-based monitoring infrastructures.
Technological convergence is catalyzing interoperability between systems historically treated as discrete. Automatic Identification Systems now routinely feed enhanced collision avoidance algorithms, while Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons and Search and Rescue Transponders integrate with digital alerting platforms to reduce false positives and accelerate resource allocation. Concurrently, cyber-physical risk management has emerged as a priority; stakeholders increasingly expect manufacturers and integrators to embed security-by-design practices. These shifts collectively increase the operational effectiveness of distress and safety solutions, but they also raise system integration, lifecycle management, and regulatory compliance requirements that operators must plan for proactively.
Assessing how recent trade measures and tariff adjustments have reshaped procurement strategies, supply chains, and localization approaches for maritime safety equipment
Tariff policies emanating from major trading partners, particularly adjustments to tariffs and trade measures implemented in recent policy cycles, have exerted measurable pressure on supply chains that underpin maritime safety equipment. Changes in import duties, classification of electronic components, and ancillary logistics surcharges have influenced procurement lead times and equipment sourcing decisions. These cumulative effects have prompted stakeholders to reassess vendor diversification strategies, inventory buffers, and localization of critical component assembly to mitigate exposure to abrupt cost escalations and shipping constraints.
The interplay between tariffs and supply-chain resilience has encouraged manufacturers and systems integrators to revisit their supplier networks and to pursue nearshoring opportunities where regulatory and labor environments permit. Procurement teams now weigh total-cost-of-ownership implications that include potential customs delays, compliance documentation overhead, and warranty support complexities across cross-border transactions. For operators and flag administrations, the net outcome has been a renewed emphasis on standardization and modularity to enable multi-source procurement without compromising interoperability. While tariffs have not altered the fundamental safety imperatives, they have accelerated strategic sourcing decisions, localized inventory policies, and collaborative frameworks between manufacturers and service providers to preserve timely equipment availability and maintain regulatory compliance.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that clarify differentiated adoption patterns, procurement drivers, and lifecycle requirements across system types and platform profiles
Segmentation-based insights reveal differentiated adoption patterns and procurement drivers across technology categories, use cases, vessel classes, and deployment modalities. Based on system type, solutions such as Automatic Identification System (AIS), Digital Selective Calling (DSC), Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB), Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), Long-Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT), Search and Rescue Transponder (SART), and Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) each present distinct integration, maintenance, and certification challenges that influence fleet-level implementation planning. For instance, AIS and DSC typically tie directly into navigational workflows and bridge team procedures, while EPIRB and SART remain critical for life-saving appliance compliance and search-and-rescue coordination.
Based on application, markets for Collision Avoidance, Distress Alerting, Navigational Safety, and Search And Rescue display divergent performance criteria and user expectations; collision avoidance is increasingly driven by real-time data fusion and predictive analytics, whereas distress alerting emphasizes reliability, redundancy, and cross-domain interoperability. Based on platform type, Commercial Vessels, Fishing Vessels, Leisure Craft, Military Vessels, and Passenger Vessels impose different regulatory, operational, and budgetary constraints that affect product selection, certification timelines, and lifecycle servicing. Based on deployment mode, Onboard Installation and Shore-Based Monitoring Systems form complementary layers where investments in shore-based analytics and monitoring can amplify onboard system effectiveness. Together, these segmentation lenses enable decision-makers to prioritize investments, tailor procurement specifications, and design maintenance programs aligned to vessel profile and mission-critical use cases.
How distinct regional regulatory frameworks, fleet compositions, and infrastructure investments are shaping procurement priorities and deployment strategies for maritime safety
Regional dynamics significantly influence regulatory frameworks, procurement preferences, and innovation pathways for maritime distress and safety systems. In the Americas, legacy fleets and busy coastal trade corridors create strong demand for retrofit solutions that meet national carriage requirements and support dense port traffic management. Stakeholders in this region often prioritize compatibility with existing port-state control regimes and operational readiness for domestic coastal search-and-rescue assets.
In Europe, the Middle East & Africa region, a mix of stringent European regulatory standards, busy Mediterranean and North Sea shipping lanes, and emerging Gulf maritime investments create heterogeneous demand that favors advanced interoperability and rapid certification processes. Operators here balance stringent compliance expectations with accelerating offshore activity and strategic investments in port infrastructure. In Asia-Pacific, fast fleet renewal cycles, significant fishing and coastal passenger traffic, and proactive national programs to modernize maritime situational awareness drive demand for integrated solutions that combine onboard systems with shore-based monitoring. Across all regions, cross-border coordination, harmonized standards, and the capacity of local service ecosystems to deliver installation and maintenance support remain decisive factors in procurement and deployment decisions.
Competitive dynamics reveal how legacy manufacturers, agile integrators, and strategic alliances are redefining vendor selection and lifecycle support in maritime safety
The competitive landscape for maritime distress and safety systems is characterized by a mix of longstanding equipment manufacturers, emerging systems integrators, and specialized service providers that offer lifecycle support and data services. Established vendors tend to lead on certification pedigree, global service footprint, and interoperability with legacy shipboard systems, and they remain trusted partners for classification bodies and regulatory compliance. Newer entrants are often more agile in software-defined capabilities, cloud-enabled monitoring, and rapid prototyping of sensor and communication modules.
Partnerships and channel strategies have become critical differentiators: companies that can bundle hardware with shore-based analytics, predictive maintenance services, and streamlined certification support create higher switching costs and greater operational continuity for vessel operators. At the same time, strategic alliances between manufacturers and satellite connectivity providers have accelerated the integration of high-bandwidth distress reporting and enriched situational data. For procurement teams, vendor selection increasingly hinges on demonstrable service-level commitments, cybersecurity credentials, and the ability to support multi-vendor interoperability across the vessel lifecycle.
Practical and prioritized actions for leaders to strengthen procurement resilience, interoperability, cybersecurity, and regulatory engagement for maritime safety programs
Industry leaders should pursue a focused set of actions that align procurement, technology roadmaps, and regulatory engagement to accelerate resilience and operational readiness. First, adopt modular architecture principles for onboard systems to enable equipment interoperability and to simplify upgrades without full-system replacement. Embrace open standards and prioritize solutions with documented certification pathways to reduce procurement friction and to accelerate deployment across heterogeneous fleets.
Second, strengthen supply-chain resilience by diversifying component suppliers and by negotiating lead-time protections with tier-one vendors. This includes exploring regional assembly or stocking models to mitigate tariff-induced disruptions and customs delays. Third, invest in shore-based analytics and remote monitoring to extend the value of onboard equipment, enabling predictive maintenance and faster incident triage. Fourth, embed cybersecurity requirements into procurement specifications to protect distress and safety signals from disruption or spoofing, and require third-party security assessments as part of vendor qualification. Finally, engage proactively with regulatory bodies and classification societies to shape implementation guidance, validate interoperable approaches, and secure early approvals for innovative solutions, thereby reducing time-to-service and ensuring compliance continuity.
A rigorous mixed-method research approach combining expert interviews, standards analysis, and data triangulation to validate technical and regulatory insights for maritime safety
This research combines structured primary engagement with subject-matter experts and rigorous secondary-source validation to ensure comprehensive coverage of technical, regulatory, and operational considerations. Primary inputs included interviews with shipowners, classification society representatives, systems integrators, and search-and-rescue coordinators to capture real-world constraints around installation, certification, and operational use. These conversations informed a synthesis of stakeholder priorities, pain points, and implementation best practices.
Secondary research incorporated public regulatory materials, technical standards documentation, vendor white papers, and incident case studies to validate assumptions about system capabilities and interoperability. Data triangulation methods matched primary observations with secondary evidence to identify consistent trends and to flag areas of divergence that warrant further investigation. Throughout the study, methodological rigor emphasized transparency of assumptions, traceability of source material, and a conservative approach to interpreting policy changes, ensuring that recommendations reflect operational realities and maintain applicability across diverse vessel types and regional regulatory environments.
Synthesizing technological, regulatory, and operational imperatives into a practical pathway for resilient and integrated maritime distress and safety systems
In conclusion, maritime distress and safety systems are transitioning from regulatory compliance components toward integrated enablers of operational resilience, driven by advances in connectivity, data integration, and a heightened emphasis on supply-chain resilience. Stakeholders that adopt modular architectures, invest in shore-based analytics, and strengthen supplier diversification will be better positioned to maintain continuity of operations and accelerate compliance across changing regulatory environments. Additionally, embedding cybersecurity and interoperability requirements into procurement specifications will protect lifesaving functionality and ensure trust across multi-actor response ecosystems.
Looking ahead, the most effective programs will blend proven hardware reliability with evolving digital capabilities, coordinated through clear governance and proactive engagement with regulators and classification bodies. This balanced approach creates a practical pathway to improve incident response, reduce false alarms, and align vessel operators with modern expectations for maritime safety and security.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
192 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of AI-driven predictive maintenance systems in maritime distress equipment for real-time risk mitigation
- 5.2. Integration of satellite-based AIS and long-range digital selective calling for enhanced oceanwide vessel tracking
- 5.3. Implementation of SOLAS e-navigation standards to standardize digital safety communications across international fleets
- 5.4. Deployment of IoT-enabled sensor networks onboard vessels for automated incident detection and emergency reporting
- 5.5. Enhancement of maritime cybersecurity protocols to protect distress and safety systems from digital threats
- 5.6. Utilization of 5G maritime connectivity to enable ultra-low-latency distress signaling and situational awareness updates
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by System Type
- 8.1. Automatic Identification System (AIS)
- 8.2. Digital Selective Calling (DSC)
- 8.3. Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB)
- 8.4. Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS)
- 8.5. Long-Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT)
- 8.6. Search and Rescue Transponder (SART)
- 8.7. Ship Security Alert System (SSAS)
- 9. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by Application
- 9.1. Collision Avoidance
- 9.2. Distress Alerting
- 9.3. Navigational Safety
- 9.4. Search And Rescue
- 10. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by Platform Type
- 10.1. Commercial Vessels
- 10.2. Fishing Vessels
- 10.3. Leisure Craft
- 10.4. Military Vessels
- 10.5. Passenger Vessels
- 11. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by Deployment Mode
- 11.1. Onboard Installation
- 11.2. Shore-Based Monitoring Systems
- 12. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Maritime Distress & Safety System Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. ACR Electronics, Inc.
- 15.3.2. AST Networks Ltd.
- 15.3.3. Cobham Limited
- 15.3.4. Elbit Systems Ltd.
- 15.3.5. Elcome International LLC
- 15.3.6. Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.
- 15.3.7. Honeywell International Inc.
- 15.3.8. Icom Incorporated
- 15.3.9. Inmarsat Global Limited
- 15.3.10. Iridium Communications Inc.
- 15.3.11. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.12. Marinetech Safety & Shipping Corporation
- 15.3.13. Musson Marine Ltd.
- 15.3.14. Ocean Signal Limited
- 15.3.15. Orolia SAS
- 15.3.16. OSI Maritime Systems Ltd.
- 15.3.17. Raytheon Anschütz GmbH
- 15.3.18. Saab AB
- 15.3.19. SHM Shipcare Private Limited
- 15.3.20. Wärtsilä Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
