Marine Radar Market by Vessel Type (Commercial Shipping, Defense And Security, Fishing), Radar Frequency (S-Band, X-Band), Technology, Installation Type, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
Description
The Marine Radar Market was valued at USD 5.32 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.78 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 9.23%, reaching USD 9.87 billion by 2032.
A strategic orientation to the evolving marine radar ecosystem driven by technological progress, regulatory pressures, and operational imperatives
The maritime domain is undergoing a pronounced technological acceleration that is redefining expectations for situational awareness, safety, and operational efficiency at sea. Recent advances in radar electronics, signal processing, and integration with navigation and sensor networks have elevated radar from a standalone safety tool to a core component of multi-sensor maritime ecosystems. At the same time, regulatory emphasis on collision avoidance and environmental monitoring has intensified the need for reliable, adaptable radar capabilities across a diverse range of vessel types and missions.
In this environment, stakeholders from shipowners to naval operators must balance legacy system compatibility with a clear pathway toward modern architectures that prioritize resilience, maintenance predictability, and software-driven capabilities. Transitioning from magnetron-based transmitters to solid-state architectures introduces opportunities for enhanced uptime and advanced processing, while the coexistence of S-band and X-band solutions addresses complementary operational requirements. Consequently, organizations should view radar technology choices not merely as equipment purchases but as strategic levers that influence crew workflows, regulatory compliance, and platform survivability.
Navigating transformative shifts as sensor fusion, solid-state processing, and software-centric architectures redefine maritime radar capabilities and procurement
The landscape for marine radar is shifting under the influence of several transformative forces that are directly shaping system design and procurement practices. First, the migration toward solid-state transmitters, coupled with digital signal processing and hybrid architectures, is enabling higher reliability, finer resolution, and reduced life-cycle maintenance burdens. This technical shift unlocks new application layers such as integrated navigation aids and advanced collision-avoidance algorithms that enhance operator decision-making.
Concurrently, integration of radar outputs with vessel navigation systems, automatic identification systems, and environmental sensors is fostering an era of sensor fusion in which radar serves as a pivotal source of validated spatial data. Autonomous and remotely operated surface vessels are accelerating requirements for real-time, deterministic radar data, while expanding expectations for cybersecurity and software update lifecycles. On the procurement side, OEM and aftermarket dynamics are evolving as buyers demand modularity, software licensing models, and post-sale service bundles. Taken together, these shifts are redefining value propositions for manufacturers, systems integrators, and end users alike.
Assessing the cumulative influence of recent tariff measures on supply chain strategies, sourcing decisions, and procurement practices across the radar value chain
Policy measures introduced in recent trade environments have had a measurable influence on global supply chains and sourcing strategies for radar components, subassemblies, and finished systems. Tariff adjustments directed at electronic components, radar antennas, and related hardware have prompted manufacturers and integrators to reassess supplier footprints and to evaluate nearshoring or dual-sourcing strategies to preserve continuity of supply and mitigate cost volatility.
As a result, original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket service providers are placing greater emphasis on supplier diversification, qualifying alternative component suppliers, and localizing certain manufacturing steps where regulatory and cost conditions permit. Defense procurement programs have also responded by increasing scrutiny of supply chain provenance and by accelerating qualification processes for domestically sourced elements. In parallel, buyers are recalibrating total cost considerations to reflect potential customs, logistics, and compliance overheads. These dynamics are catalyzing strategic adjustments across the value chain, from electronics vendors to system integrators and end users.
Deep segmentation intelligence revealing how vessel class, frequency selection, technology pathways, installation choices, and applications shape procurement and product strategy
Analyzing product and service strategies requires a clear view of how different segments of demand shape technology choices and deployment models. Based on vessel type, the market encompasses Commercial Shipping, Defense And Security, Fishing, Offshore Support, and Recreational vessels; Commercial Shipping further differentiates into Bulk Carrier, Cargo Ship, Container Ship, and Tanker; Defense And Security divides into Coast Guard and Naval; Fishing includes Aquaculture Support and Wild Capture; Offshore Support covers Anchor Handling Tug Supply and Platform Supply Vessel; and Recreational covers Pleasure Boat and Yacht. These distinctions matter because platform mission profiles and crew expertise directly influence radar selection criteria, installation complexity, and aftermarket support expectations.
Based on radar frequency, systems are evaluated across S-Band and X-Band, each offering trade-offs between range and resolution that align with different operational needs, from long-range surveillance to fine-resolution harbor navigation. Based on technology, offerings include Magnetron Based and Solid State systems; Magnetron Based systems are typically conventional, while Solid State encompasses Digital Signal Processing and Hybrid approaches that enable enhanced reliability and signal fidelity. Based on installation type, procurement pathways split between Aftermarket and Oem solutions, reflecting differences in warranty, integration responsibility, and lifecycle management. Based on application, radar use cases include Collision Avoidance, Navigation, Surveillance, and Weather Monitoring, with Surveillance further categorized into Environmental Monitoring and Security; application priorities influence software feature sets, operator interfaces, and certification requirements. Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal that product roadmaps and commercial models must be tailored to platform class, intended application, and preferred installation channel to maximize operational value and customer satisfaction.
Regional dynamics and nuanced operational drivers shaping adoption priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific maritime domains
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on procurement cycles, regulatory priorities, and technology adoption patterns across the globe. In the Americas, dense commercial corridors, extensive offshore activity, and significant coast guard modernization programs create demand for a mix of high-reliability systems and flexible aftermarket services, with particular emphasis on interoperability and lifecycle support. Translating strategic objectives into procurement outcomes requires alignment with regional certification regimes and an understanding of the legacy installed base.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape characterized by advanced regulatory frameworks in some European markets, energy-driven offshore requirements in parts of the Middle East, and varied maritime infrastructure across Africa. These conditions drive differentiated requirements for long-range surveillance, commercial fleet modernization, and security-focused solutions. Asia-Pacific combines high vessel traffic density, rapidly expanding commercial and offshore fleets, and significant naval investment, resulting in robust demand for both high-resolution X-Band systems and resilient S-Band architectures. Across all regions, local content rules, defense procurement practices, and logistics considerations influence supplier selection and aftermarket service strategies, making regional nuance essential to effective market engagement.
Competitive and corporate insights highlighting how incumbents, new entrants, and partnerships reshape offerings through hardware, software, and service convergence
Competitive dynamics in the marine radar space are shaped by a mix of established system manufacturers, specialized electronics suppliers, defense contractors, and agile technology entrants. Leading incumbents tend to combine hardware engineering expertise with deep service networks and certification experience, while newer entrants focus on software-defined capabilities, advanced signal processing, and niche sensor fusion solutions. Many companies are pursuing strategic partnerships to combine radar hardware with navigation platforms, AIS data streams, and weather services, thereby offering integrated solutions that extend beyond hardware alone.
From a corporate strategy perspective, there is a growing emphasis on aftersales revenue streams, including predictive maintenance services, software updates, and training programs that enhance long-term customer retention. Mergers, acquisitions, and cross-licensing arrangements are evident as firms seek to accelerate access to digital signal processing competencies, solid-state transmitter designs, and global distribution channels. For buyers, vendor selection criteria increasingly weigh the supplier’s ability to deliver on software-roadmap commitments, cybersecurity safeguards, and regional service presence as much as the raw performance characteristics of radar hardware.
Actionable strategic recommendations for manufacturers and operators to futureproof radar portfolios through supply chain resilience, modular design, and lifecycle services
Industry leaders should treat radar strategy as an integrated program that spans product design, supplier management, and customer support. To reduce exposure to input-cost variability and policy disruptions, companies should implement multi-sourcing strategies, qualify second-tier suppliers for critical components, and consider localized assembly for key markets to shorten logistical lead times. Investing in modular hardware architectures and open software interfaces will enable more rapid feature deployment and easier integration with navigation and sensor ecosystems.
Moreover, organizations should prioritize lifecycle service models that combine remote diagnostics, predictive maintenance, and training to differentiate offerings and generate sustainable revenue. Technology investments should favor solid-state architectures and advanced digital signal processing to improve reliability and enable higher-value applications such as autonomous navigation support and environmental monitoring. Finally, proactive engagement with regulatory bodies and participation in standards development will help shape interoperable solutions and reduce future compliance friction, while targeted partnerships can accelerate entry into new regions or applications.
A rigorous mixed methods research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical evaluation, and supply chain scenario analysis to validate insights
The research underpinning this analysis employed a mixed-methods approach that synthesizes primary stakeholder engagement with rigorous technical and open-source inquiry. Primary inputs included structured interviews with system integrators, naval architects, procurement officers, and platform operators to validate operational priorities and to surface real-world installation challenges. These interviews were complemented by supplier consultations focused on design trade-offs, lead times, and component sourcing practices.
Secondary research covered public regulatory documentation, technical standards, and recent industry announcements to triangulate trends in technology adoption and procurement behavior. Technical assessments evaluated the performance implications of S-Band versus X-Band solutions and the operational trade-offs between magnetron and solid-state technologies. Supply chain mapping and scenario analysis were used to assess the potential impact of policy shifts on sourcing strategies and component availability. Together, these methods produced a robust evidence base that supports the insights and recommendations presented here.
A concise synthesis of strategic priorities and implications as technology, procurement dynamics, and regional policy converge to redefine radar value propositions
In conclusion, the marine radar sector is at an inflection point where technological maturation, shifting procurement dynamics, and evolving regulatory expectations converge to create both challenge and opportunity. Solid-state radar technologies and advanced signal processing are expanding functional capabilities while altering maintenance paradigms, and integration with navigation, AIS, and environmental sensors is elevating radar’s role within the broader maritime information architecture.
At the same time, supply chain considerations and regional policy measures are prompting strategic adjustments in sourcing and manufacturing footprints. For organizations that proactively align product roadmaps with service-oriented business models, invest in modular, software-enabled platforms, and strengthen regional operational capabilities, the current environment offers a pathway to sustained competitive differentiation. Conversely, failure to adapt risks increasing operational friction and weakening long-term service relationships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic orientation to the evolving marine radar ecosystem driven by technological progress, regulatory pressures, and operational imperatives
The maritime domain is undergoing a pronounced technological acceleration that is redefining expectations for situational awareness, safety, and operational efficiency at sea. Recent advances in radar electronics, signal processing, and integration with navigation and sensor networks have elevated radar from a standalone safety tool to a core component of multi-sensor maritime ecosystems. At the same time, regulatory emphasis on collision avoidance and environmental monitoring has intensified the need for reliable, adaptable radar capabilities across a diverse range of vessel types and missions.
In this environment, stakeholders from shipowners to naval operators must balance legacy system compatibility with a clear pathway toward modern architectures that prioritize resilience, maintenance predictability, and software-driven capabilities. Transitioning from magnetron-based transmitters to solid-state architectures introduces opportunities for enhanced uptime and advanced processing, while the coexistence of S-band and X-band solutions addresses complementary operational requirements. Consequently, organizations should view radar technology choices not merely as equipment purchases but as strategic levers that influence crew workflows, regulatory compliance, and platform survivability.
Navigating transformative shifts as sensor fusion, solid-state processing, and software-centric architectures redefine maritime radar capabilities and procurement
The landscape for marine radar is shifting under the influence of several transformative forces that are directly shaping system design and procurement practices. First, the migration toward solid-state transmitters, coupled with digital signal processing and hybrid architectures, is enabling higher reliability, finer resolution, and reduced life-cycle maintenance burdens. This technical shift unlocks new application layers such as integrated navigation aids and advanced collision-avoidance algorithms that enhance operator decision-making.
Concurrently, integration of radar outputs with vessel navigation systems, automatic identification systems, and environmental sensors is fostering an era of sensor fusion in which radar serves as a pivotal source of validated spatial data. Autonomous and remotely operated surface vessels are accelerating requirements for real-time, deterministic radar data, while expanding expectations for cybersecurity and software update lifecycles. On the procurement side, OEM and aftermarket dynamics are evolving as buyers demand modularity, software licensing models, and post-sale service bundles. Taken together, these shifts are redefining value propositions for manufacturers, systems integrators, and end users alike.
Assessing the cumulative influence of recent tariff measures on supply chain strategies, sourcing decisions, and procurement practices across the radar value chain
Policy measures introduced in recent trade environments have had a measurable influence on global supply chains and sourcing strategies for radar components, subassemblies, and finished systems. Tariff adjustments directed at electronic components, radar antennas, and related hardware have prompted manufacturers and integrators to reassess supplier footprints and to evaluate nearshoring or dual-sourcing strategies to preserve continuity of supply and mitigate cost volatility.
As a result, original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket service providers are placing greater emphasis on supplier diversification, qualifying alternative component suppliers, and localizing certain manufacturing steps where regulatory and cost conditions permit. Defense procurement programs have also responded by increasing scrutiny of supply chain provenance and by accelerating qualification processes for domestically sourced elements. In parallel, buyers are recalibrating total cost considerations to reflect potential customs, logistics, and compliance overheads. These dynamics are catalyzing strategic adjustments across the value chain, from electronics vendors to system integrators and end users.
Deep segmentation intelligence revealing how vessel class, frequency selection, technology pathways, installation choices, and applications shape procurement and product strategy
Analyzing product and service strategies requires a clear view of how different segments of demand shape technology choices and deployment models. Based on vessel type, the market encompasses Commercial Shipping, Defense And Security, Fishing, Offshore Support, and Recreational vessels; Commercial Shipping further differentiates into Bulk Carrier, Cargo Ship, Container Ship, and Tanker; Defense And Security divides into Coast Guard and Naval; Fishing includes Aquaculture Support and Wild Capture; Offshore Support covers Anchor Handling Tug Supply and Platform Supply Vessel; and Recreational covers Pleasure Boat and Yacht. These distinctions matter because platform mission profiles and crew expertise directly influence radar selection criteria, installation complexity, and aftermarket support expectations.
Based on radar frequency, systems are evaluated across S-Band and X-Band, each offering trade-offs between range and resolution that align with different operational needs, from long-range surveillance to fine-resolution harbor navigation. Based on technology, offerings include Magnetron Based and Solid State systems; Magnetron Based systems are typically conventional, while Solid State encompasses Digital Signal Processing and Hybrid approaches that enable enhanced reliability and signal fidelity. Based on installation type, procurement pathways split between Aftermarket and Oem solutions, reflecting differences in warranty, integration responsibility, and lifecycle management. Based on application, radar use cases include Collision Avoidance, Navigation, Surveillance, and Weather Monitoring, with Surveillance further categorized into Environmental Monitoring and Security; application priorities influence software feature sets, operator interfaces, and certification requirements. Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal that product roadmaps and commercial models must be tailored to platform class, intended application, and preferred installation channel to maximize operational value and customer satisfaction.
Regional dynamics and nuanced operational drivers shaping adoption priorities across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific maritime domains
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on procurement cycles, regulatory priorities, and technology adoption patterns across the globe. In the Americas, dense commercial corridors, extensive offshore activity, and significant coast guard modernization programs create demand for a mix of high-reliability systems and flexible aftermarket services, with particular emphasis on interoperability and lifecycle support. Translating strategic objectives into procurement outcomes requires alignment with regional certification regimes and an understanding of the legacy installed base.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape characterized by advanced regulatory frameworks in some European markets, energy-driven offshore requirements in parts of the Middle East, and varied maritime infrastructure across Africa. These conditions drive differentiated requirements for long-range surveillance, commercial fleet modernization, and security-focused solutions. Asia-Pacific combines high vessel traffic density, rapidly expanding commercial and offshore fleets, and significant naval investment, resulting in robust demand for both high-resolution X-Band systems and resilient S-Band architectures. Across all regions, local content rules, defense procurement practices, and logistics considerations influence supplier selection and aftermarket service strategies, making regional nuance essential to effective market engagement.
Competitive and corporate insights highlighting how incumbents, new entrants, and partnerships reshape offerings through hardware, software, and service convergence
Competitive dynamics in the marine radar space are shaped by a mix of established system manufacturers, specialized electronics suppliers, defense contractors, and agile technology entrants. Leading incumbents tend to combine hardware engineering expertise with deep service networks and certification experience, while newer entrants focus on software-defined capabilities, advanced signal processing, and niche sensor fusion solutions. Many companies are pursuing strategic partnerships to combine radar hardware with navigation platforms, AIS data streams, and weather services, thereby offering integrated solutions that extend beyond hardware alone.
From a corporate strategy perspective, there is a growing emphasis on aftersales revenue streams, including predictive maintenance services, software updates, and training programs that enhance long-term customer retention. Mergers, acquisitions, and cross-licensing arrangements are evident as firms seek to accelerate access to digital signal processing competencies, solid-state transmitter designs, and global distribution channels. For buyers, vendor selection criteria increasingly weigh the supplier’s ability to deliver on software-roadmap commitments, cybersecurity safeguards, and regional service presence as much as the raw performance characteristics of radar hardware.
Actionable strategic recommendations for manufacturers and operators to futureproof radar portfolios through supply chain resilience, modular design, and lifecycle services
Industry leaders should treat radar strategy as an integrated program that spans product design, supplier management, and customer support. To reduce exposure to input-cost variability and policy disruptions, companies should implement multi-sourcing strategies, qualify second-tier suppliers for critical components, and consider localized assembly for key markets to shorten logistical lead times. Investing in modular hardware architectures and open software interfaces will enable more rapid feature deployment and easier integration with navigation and sensor ecosystems.
Moreover, organizations should prioritize lifecycle service models that combine remote diagnostics, predictive maintenance, and training to differentiate offerings and generate sustainable revenue. Technology investments should favor solid-state architectures and advanced digital signal processing to improve reliability and enable higher-value applications such as autonomous navigation support and environmental monitoring. Finally, proactive engagement with regulatory bodies and participation in standards development will help shape interoperable solutions and reduce future compliance friction, while targeted partnerships can accelerate entry into new regions or applications.
A rigorous mixed methods research approach combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical evaluation, and supply chain scenario analysis to validate insights
The research underpinning this analysis employed a mixed-methods approach that synthesizes primary stakeholder engagement with rigorous technical and open-source inquiry. Primary inputs included structured interviews with system integrators, naval architects, procurement officers, and platform operators to validate operational priorities and to surface real-world installation challenges. These interviews were complemented by supplier consultations focused on design trade-offs, lead times, and component sourcing practices.
Secondary research covered public regulatory documentation, technical standards, and recent industry announcements to triangulate trends in technology adoption and procurement behavior. Technical assessments evaluated the performance implications of S-Band versus X-Band solutions and the operational trade-offs between magnetron and solid-state technologies. Supply chain mapping and scenario analysis were used to assess the potential impact of policy shifts on sourcing strategies and component availability. Together, these methods produced a robust evidence base that supports the insights and recommendations presented here.
A concise synthesis of strategic priorities and implications as technology, procurement dynamics, and regional policy converge to redefine radar value propositions
In conclusion, the marine radar sector is at an inflection point where technological maturation, shifting procurement dynamics, and evolving regulatory expectations converge to create both challenge and opportunity. Solid-state radar technologies and advanced signal processing are expanding functional capabilities while altering maintenance paradigms, and integration with navigation, AIS, and environmental sensors is elevating radar’s role within the broader maritime information architecture.
At the same time, supply chain considerations and regional policy measures are prompting strategic adjustments in sourcing and manufacturing footprints. For organizations that proactively align product roadmaps with service-oriented business models, invest in modular, software-enabled platforms, and strengthen regional operational capabilities, the current environment offers a pathway to sustained competitive differentiation. Conversely, failure to adapt risks increasing operational friction and weakening long-term service relationships.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
196 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Marine Radar Market, by Vessel Type
- 8.1. Commercial Shipping
- 8.1.1. Bulk Carrier
- 8.1.2. Cargo Ship
- 8.1.3. Container Ship
- 8.1.4. Tanker
- 8.2. Defense And Security
- 8.2.1. Coast Guard
- 8.2.2. Naval
- 8.3. Fishing
- 8.3.1. Aquaculture Support
- 8.3.2. Wild Capture
- 8.4. Offshore Support
- 8.4.1. Anchor Handling Tug Supply
- 8.4.2. Platform Supply Vessel
- 8.5. Recreational
- 8.5.1. Pleasure Boat
- 8.5.2. Yacht
- 9. Marine Radar Market, by Radar Frequency
- 9.1. S-Band
- 9.2. X-Band
- 10. Marine Radar Market, by Technology
- 10.1. Magnetron Based
- 10.2. Solid State
- 10.2.1. Digital Signal Processing
- 10.2.2. Hybrid
- 11. Marine Radar Market, by Installation Type
- 11.1. Aftermarket
- 11.2. Oem
- 12. Marine Radar Market, by Application
- 12.1. Collision Avoidance
- 12.2. Navigation
- 12.3. Surveillance
- 12.3.1. Environmental Monitoring
- 12.3.2. Security
- 12.4. Weather Monitoring
- 13. Marine Radar Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Marine Radar Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Marine Radar Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. United States Marine Radar Market
- 17. China Marine Radar Market
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 18.5. Bharat Electronics Limited
- 18.6. Consilium Marine & Safety AB
- 18.7. FLIR Systems, Inc.
- 18.8. Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.
- 18.9. Garmin Ltd.
- 18.10. GEM Elettronica
- 18.11. HENSOLDT AG
- 18.12. Japan Radio Co., Ltd.
- 18.13. Kelvin Hughes Limited
- 18.14. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
- 18.15. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
- 18.16. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- 18.17. Navico Holding AS
- 18.18. Northrop Grumman Corporation
- 18.19. Raymarine by Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
- 18.20. Raytheon Anschütz GmbH
- 18.21. Saab AB
- 18.22. Terma A/S
- 18.23. Thales Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
