Managed Security Services Market by Service Type (Managed Detection & Response, Managed Firewall, Managed Identity & Access Management), Type (Co-Managed Security Service, Fully-Managed Security Services), Security Type, Deployment, Organization Size, Ind
Description
The Managed Security Services Market was valued at USD 32.51 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 36.39 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 12.84%, reaching USD 85.50 billion by 2032.
A concise strategic framing for why modern enterprises are accelerating adoption of managed security services to strengthen resilience and operational efficiency
The global managed security services landscape is undergoing a decisive shift as organizations reconcile expanding threat surfaces with constrained internal security capacity. Executives face pressure to modernize defenses across cloud, hybrid, and on-premises estates while optimizing for operational resilience and cost efficiency. In response, security leaders are increasingly turning to managed providers for specialized detection, remediation, and compliance capabilities that augment internal teams and shorten time-to-response. This introduction frames the strategic rationale behind outsourcing portions of security operations and positions managed services as a core enabler for organizations seeking to harden cyber posture without overextending scarce talent pools.
Over the last few years, the complexity and velocity of cyber threats have accelerated, encouraging a transition from traditional perimeter-centric controls to continuous monitoring and adaptive response models. The result is a stronger emphasis on integrated service offerings that combine threat intelligence, automation, and human-led investigation. As a consequence, procurement teams and CISOs must now evaluate providers not only on technology stack but also on orchestration maturity, playbook depth, and their ability to integrate with existing IT and DevOps workflows. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper examination of market dynamics, regulatory influences, and the practical segmentation that informs sourcing strategies today.
How cloud migration, talent scarcity, and evolving cyberattacks are reshaping managed security services and redefining buyer expectations for outcomes and governance
The managed security services ecosystem is experiencing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, operational, and regulatory forces. Cloud migration continues to redefine asset boundaries and demands new security patterns that prioritize identity, data protection, and workload visibility. At the same time, the rise of sophisticated ransomware and supply-chain attacks has elevated demand for advanced detection capabilities and rapid incident response, prompting providers to invest in threat hunting, behavioral analytics, and automated containment.
Operationally, the chronic shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals has reshaped engagement models. Organizations increasingly prefer co-managed arrangements where in-house teams retain strategic control while outsourcing labor-intensive monitoring and triage tasks. This hybrid approach promotes knowledge transfer and reduces vendor lock-in risk. In addition, service differentiation is moving beyond traditional tool-centric offerings toward outcome-based SLAs, playbook-driven remediation, and risk-aligned reporting that speaks directly to board-level priorities.
Regulatory pressures and data residency requirements are also influencing architecture choices, driving demand for deployment flexibility across cloud and on-premises models. Providers that demonstrate transparent governance, auditability, and integration with compliance workflows are gaining traction. Collectively, these shifts are forging a market where agility, interoperability, and demonstrable operational maturity determine provider relevance and buyer confidence.
Practical repercussions of recent tariff shifts on procurement, vendor risk assessment, and the acceleration of software-first security sourcing strategies
Policy changes and trade tensions can introduce new complexity for security sourcing, supply chain integrity, and vendor risk management. In 2025, tariff adjustments in the United States affected cross-border procurement dynamics, prompting organizations to reassess sourcing strategies for hardware, security appliances, and bundled service contracts. The immediate operational implication was a renewed emphasis on software-centric solutions and cloud-native security functions that reduce dependence on imported physical infrastructure. Many security teams accelerated transitions to virtualized and SaaS-delivered controls to mitigate exposure to import-related cost volatility and logistics delays.
Beyond procurement considerations, the tariff environment elevated scrutiny of vendor supply chains and software provenance. Security leaders expanded third-party risk assessments to include tariff and trade compliance as part of vendor due diligence, linking economic policy risk to potential service continuity concerns. This led to more rigorous contractual protections, localized deployment options, and contingency planning to preserve critical monitoring and incident response capabilities.
Over time, the net effect has been a reinforcement of cloud-first and software-delivered security modalities, coupled with heightened emphasis on multi-vendor resilience and geographically diversified service footprints. Organizations that proactively adapted procurement criteria and governance practices were better positioned to sustain security operations without material disruptions stemming from tariff-induced supply chain shifts.
A nuanced segmentation-driven perspective that links service types, engagement models, security domains, deployment choices, organization size, and industry-specific needs to procurement priorities
Effective segmentation analysis clarifies how demand patterns vary across service types, delivery models, technology focus, deployment choices, organization scale, and industry requirements. When examining offerings by service type, demand clusters around managed detection and response for 24/7 threat coverage, managed firewall services for network perimeter control, managed identity and access management to secure user and machine identities, managed risk and compliance management to align operations with regulatory expectations, managed SIEM and log management for centralized visibility, and managed vulnerability management to prioritize remediation efforts. These service distinctions influence procurement criteria and vendor evaluation, with some buyers favoring integrated suites while others assemble best-of-breed stacks.
Considering the type of engagement, purchasers choose between co-managed security services that preserve internal control and fully-managed security services that transfer operational burden to the provider. Security type considerations further refine choices: application security services focus on code and runtime protections, cloud security emphasizes workload and configuration posture, endpoint security targets device-level defenses, and network security secures traffic flows and segmentation. Deployment strategy also plays a critical role, with on-cloud options offering scalability and rapid provisioning while on-premises deployments meet strict data residency or latency requirements. Organization size shapes procurement sophistication and risk tolerance, where large enterprises often pursue bespoke, multi-vendor engagements and small and medium enterprises value turnkey solutions with predictable cost profiles. Industry verticals introduce unique threat landscapes and compliance constraints; sectors such as aerospace and defense, banking, financial services and insurance, energy and utilities, government and public sector, healthcare, IT and telecommunications, manufacturing, and retail each demand tailored security controls and sector-specific service level commitments. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables buyers and providers to align capability, delivery model, and governance constructs to the real-world needs of different organizational contexts.
How regional regulatory diversity, cloud adoption patterns, and local deployment preferences are reshaping managed security service offerings and buyer priorities
Regional dynamics materially shape provider portfolios, compliance expectations, and preferred deployment architectures. In the Americas, large-scale cloud adoption and a mature managed services market have driven demand for advanced analytics, threat intelligence fusion, and outcome-based contracts, while regulatory focus on data privacy and critical infrastructure protection continues to influence vendor selection and reporting capabilities. Customer expectations in this region emphasize integration with enterprise incident response plans and strong SLA transparency.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory heterogeneity and data sovereignty concerns encourage providers to offer localized deployment options and robust compliance tooling. Buyers often prioritize demonstrable auditability and tailored governance frameworks that align with regional privacy regimes and sectoral regulations. This region also displays an appetite for managed services that can support multilingual operations and complex multinational reporting requirements.
In the Asia-Pacific corridor, rapid cloud adoption and significant digital transformation initiatives have expanded demand for scalable, automated security operations. Organizations in this region frequently balance the need for cost-effective solutions with appetite for innovative detection and response capabilities, while national cybersecurity strategies and evolving regulatory frameworks shape adoption patterns. Providers that offer flexible, site-aware delivery models and strong local partnerships tend to gain traction. Understanding these regional differences enables vendors to tune delivery models, compliance support, and commercial terms to the expectations of buyers in each geography.
A practical examination of provider differentiation that contrasts vertical specialization, automation investments, partnership ecosystems, and operational transparency in managed security services
A competitive review of leading managed security service providers highlights divergence in specialization, orchestration maturity, and commercial models. Some firms differentiate through deep vertical expertise, embedding industry-specific threat intelligence and regulatory playbooks into their service fabric. Others prioritize scale and automation, investing heavily in SIEM modernization, orchestration platforms, and proprietary analytics to deliver consistent detection and response at cost points that appeal to large, distributed customers. Partnership ecosystems play a pivotal role; vendors that cultivate strong technology alliances, professional services capabilities, and channel relationships are better positioned to execute complex, multi-cloud deployments.
Operational excellence manifests in transparent service-level definitions, measurable mean-time-to-detect and mean-time-to-respond metrics, and customer-facing reporting that ties security outcomes to business risk. Meanwhile, providers that enable flexible engagement models-allowing co-management, white-glove fully-managed operations, and hybrid on-premises/cloud support-address a broader set of buyer needs. For security buyers, evaluating provider roadmaps, professional services depth, and evidence of continuous improvement through red teaming or purple teaming engagements is critical. To make informed partner choices, organizations should weigh vendor strengths across technology integration, incident orchestration, vertical compliance knowledge, and post-incident remediation support.
Actionable procurement and governance practices that senior security and procurement leaders can deploy to maximize value from managed security service partnerships
Industry leaders can accelerate security program effectiveness by aligning sourcing decisions with clear operational outcomes and governance guardrails. First, prioritize capability mapping: define the security functions that must remain in-house for strategic control and identify routine monitoring and triage activities appropriate for outsourcing. This approach preserves institutional knowledge while unlocking provider scale for repetitive tasks. Next, adopt standardized integration and data exchange patterns to ensure seamless interoperability between vendor platforms and internal tooling; prioritize APIs, playbook compatibility, and shared telemetry schemas to reduce friction and support automated response.
Leaders should also insist on outcome-focused SLAs that map to measurable detection and response metrics rather than broad availability assurances. Construct contractual clauses that clarify roles for incident escalation, evidence preservation, and regulatory notification to reduce ambiguity during high-stakes events. From a procurement lens, evaluate providers on their ability to operate in co-managed modes and provide repeatable onboarding frameworks that decrease time-to-value. Finally, invest in governance mechanisms that maintain executive visibility into outsourced operations through executive dashboards, quarterly risk reviews, and joint tabletop exercises. These practices will increase resilience, optimize total cost of ownership, and enable continuous improvement across security operations.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining technical assessments, practitioner interviews, vendor questionnaires, and compliance mapping to ensure robust insights
This research synthesized insights from structured vendor assessments, technical capability mapping, practitioner interviews, and a review of publicly available regulatory guidance to form a holistic picture of the managed security services landscape. Technical assessments examined orchestration maturity, detection engineering practices, threat intelligence integration, and deployment flexibility across cloud and on-premises environments. Practitioner interviews illuminated real-world operational trade-offs associated with co-managed versus fully-managed engagements, the efficacy of runbooks in reducing mean-time-to-respond, and the procurement challenges associated with multisource architectures.
To ensure robustness, vendor questionnaires probed service-level commitments, onboarding practices, integration APIs, and escalation protocols, while case studies evaluated outcomes from incident response engagements and remediation projects. Risk and compliance reviews mapped regional and sectoral regulatory obligations to recommended service attributes. Throughout the analysis, cross-validation between interview inputs and technical assessments mitigated single-source bias and highlighted consistent patterns of buyer preference. The methodology emphasizes transparency around assumptions and systematically documents capability differentials to support informed buyer decisions and vendor comparisons.
A strategic summation linking operational reality, provider capability evolution, and governance imperatives to guide security leaders in extracting real strategic value from managed services
In a landscape marked by accelerated cloud adoption, sophisticated threat actors, and evolving regulatory expectations, managed security services have emerged as a pragmatic lever for organizations to maintain robust defensive postures while managing talent and cost constraints. The cumulative effect of technological shifts, procurement pressures, and policy dynamics underscores the importance of flexible engagement models, transparent operational metrics, and strong governance. Buyers that align sourcing strategies to specific risk appetites and operational realities will secure better outcomes and reduce exposure to supply chain and policy-driven disruptions.
As providers continue to invest in automation, analytics, and vertical specialization, the market will favor those that demonstrate consistent operational performance, integration ease, and the ability to evolve service playbooks in response to new attack techniques. For security leaders, the path forward requires disciplined capability mapping, rigorous vendor evaluation anchored in measurable outcomes, and governance frameworks that preserve strategic control while leveraging external scale. Those who act decisively will convert managed security services from a cost line item into a strategic asset that enhances resilience and enables safe digital transformation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A concise strategic framing for why modern enterprises are accelerating adoption of managed security services to strengthen resilience and operational efficiency
The global managed security services landscape is undergoing a decisive shift as organizations reconcile expanding threat surfaces with constrained internal security capacity. Executives face pressure to modernize defenses across cloud, hybrid, and on-premises estates while optimizing for operational resilience and cost efficiency. In response, security leaders are increasingly turning to managed providers for specialized detection, remediation, and compliance capabilities that augment internal teams and shorten time-to-response. This introduction frames the strategic rationale behind outsourcing portions of security operations and positions managed services as a core enabler for organizations seeking to harden cyber posture without overextending scarce talent pools.
Over the last few years, the complexity and velocity of cyber threats have accelerated, encouraging a transition from traditional perimeter-centric controls to continuous monitoring and adaptive response models. The result is a stronger emphasis on integrated service offerings that combine threat intelligence, automation, and human-led investigation. As a consequence, procurement teams and CISOs must now evaluate providers not only on technology stack but also on orchestration maturity, playbook depth, and their ability to integrate with existing IT and DevOps workflows. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper examination of market dynamics, regulatory influences, and the practical segmentation that informs sourcing strategies today.
How cloud migration, talent scarcity, and evolving cyberattacks are reshaping managed security services and redefining buyer expectations for outcomes and governance
The managed security services ecosystem is experiencing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, operational, and regulatory forces. Cloud migration continues to redefine asset boundaries and demands new security patterns that prioritize identity, data protection, and workload visibility. At the same time, the rise of sophisticated ransomware and supply-chain attacks has elevated demand for advanced detection capabilities and rapid incident response, prompting providers to invest in threat hunting, behavioral analytics, and automated containment.
Operationally, the chronic shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals has reshaped engagement models. Organizations increasingly prefer co-managed arrangements where in-house teams retain strategic control while outsourcing labor-intensive monitoring and triage tasks. This hybrid approach promotes knowledge transfer and reduces vendor lock-in risk. In addition, service differentiation is moving beyond traditional tool-centric offerings toward outcome-based SLAs, playbook-driven remediation, and risk-aligned reporting that speaks directly to board-level priorities.
Regulatory pressures and data residency requirements are also influencing architecture choices, driving demand for deployment flexibility across cloud and on-premises models. Providers that demonstrate transparent governance, auditability, and integration with compliance workflows are gaining traction. Collectively, these shifts are forging a market where agility, interoperability, and demonstrable operational maturity determine provider relevance and buyer confidence.
Practical repercussions of recent tariff shifts on procurement, vendor risk assessment, and the acceleration of software-first security sourcing strategies
Policy changes and trade tensions can introduce new complexity for security sourcing, supply chain integrity, and vendor risk management. In 2025, tariff adjustments in the United States affected cross-border procurement dynamics, prompting organizations to reassess sourcing strategies for hardware, security appliances, and bundled service contracts. The immediate operational implication was a renewed emphasis on software-centric solutions and cloud-native security functions that reduce dependence on imported physical infrastructure. Many security teams accelerated transitions to virtualized and SaaS-delivered controls to mitigate exposure to import-related cost volatility and logistics delays.
Beyond procurement considerations, the tariff environment elevated scrutiny of vendor supply chains and software provenance. Security leaders expanded third-party risk assessments to include tariff and trade compliance as part of vendor due diligence, linking economic policy risk to potential service continuity concerns. This led to more rigorous contractual protections, localized deployment options, and contingency planning to preserve critical monitoring and incident response capabilities.
Over time, the net effect has been a reinforcement of cloud-first and software-delivered security modalities, coupled with heightened emphasis on multi-vendor resilience and geographically diversified service footprints. Organizations that proactively adapted procurement criteria and governance practices were better positioned to sustain security operations without material disruptions stemming from tariff-induced supply chain shifts.
A nuanced segmentation-driven perspective that links service types, engagement models, security domains, deployment choices, organization size, and industry-specific needs to procurement priorities
Effective segmentation analysis clarifies how demand patterns vary across service types, delivery models, technology focus, deployment choices, organization scale, and industry requirements. When examining offerings by service type, demand clusters around managed detection and response for 24/7 threat coverage, managed firewall services for network perimeter control, managed identity and access management to secure user and machine identities, managed risk and compliance management to align operations with regulatory expectations, managed SIEM and log management for centralized visibility, and managed vulnerability management to prioritize remediation efforts. These service distinctions influence procurement criteria and vendor evaluation, with some buyers favoring integrated suites while others assemble best-of-breed stacks.
Considering the type of engagement, purchasers choose between co-managed security services that preserve internal control and fully-managed security services that transfer operational burden to the provider. Security type considerations further refine choices: application security services focus on code and runtime protections, cloud security emphasizes workload and configuration posture, endpoint security targets device-level defenses, and network security secures traffic flows and segmentation. Deployment strategy also plays a critical role, with on-cloud options offering scalability and rapid provisioning while on-premises deployments meet strict data residency or latency requirements. Organization size shapes procurement sophistication and risk tolerance, where large enterprises often pursue bespoke, multi-vendor engagements and small and medium enterprises value turnkey solutions with predictable cost profiles. Industry verticals introduce unique threat landscapes and compliance constraints; sectors such as aerospace and defense, banking, financial services and insurance, energy and utilities, government and public sector, healthcare, IT and telecommunications, manufacturing, and retail each demand tailored security controls and sector-specific service level commitments. Integrating these segmentation lenses enables buyers and providers to align capability, delivery model, and governance constructs to the real-world needs of different organizational contexts.
How regional regulatory diversity, cloud adoption patterns, and local deployment preferences are reshaping managed security service offerings and buyer priorities
Regional dynamics materially shape provider portfolios, compliance expectations, and preferred deployment architectures. In the Americas, large-scale cloud adoption and a mature managed services market have driven demand for advanced analytics, threat intelligence fusion, and outcome-based contracts, while regulatory focus on data privacy and critical infrastructure protection continues to influence vendor selection and reporting capabilities. Customer expectations in this region emphasize integration with enterprise incident response plans and strong SLA transparency.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory heterogeneity and data sovereignty concerns encourage providers to offer localized deployment options and robust compliance tooling. Buyers often prioritize demonstrable auditability and tailored governance frameworks that align with regional privacy regimes and sectoral regulations. This region also displays an appetite for managed services that can support multilingual operations and complex multinational reporting requirements.
In the Asia-Pacific corridor, rapid cloud adoption and significant digital transformation initiatives have expanded demand for scalable, automated security operations. Organizations in this region frequently balance the need for cost-effective solutions with appetite for innovative detection and response capabilities, while national cybersecurity strategies and evolving regulatory frameworks shape adoption patterns. Providers that offer flexible, site-aware delivery models and strong local partnerships tend to gain traction. Understanding these regional differences enables vendors to tune delivery models, compliance support, and commercial terms to the expectations of buyers in each geography.
A practical examination of provider differentiation that contrasts vertical specialization, automation investments, partnership ecosystems, and operational transparency in managed security services
A competitive review of leading managed security service providers highlights divergence in specialization, orchestration maturity, and commercial models. Some firms differentiate through deep vertical expertise, embedding industry-specific threat intelligence and regulatory playbooks into their service fabric. Others prioritize scale and automation, investing heavily in SIEM modernization, orchestration platforms, and proprietary analytics to deliver consistent detection and response at cost points that appeal to large, distributed customers. Partnership ecosystems play a pivotal role; vendors that cultivate strong technology alliances, professional services capabilities, and channel relationships are better positioned to execute complex, multi-cloud deployments.
Operational excellence manifests in transparent service-level definitions, measurable mean-time-to-detect and mean-time-to-respond metrics, and customer-facing reporting that ties security outcomes to business risk. Meanwhile, providers that enable flexible engagement models-allowing co-management, white-glove fully-managed operations, and hybrid on-premises/cloud support-address a broader set of buyer needs. For security buyers, evaluating provider roadmaps, professional services depth, and evidence of continuous improvement through red teaming or purple teaming engagements is critical. To make informed partner choices, organizations should weigh vendor strengths across technology integration, incident orchestration, vertical compliance knowledge, and post-incident remediation support.
Actionable procurement and governance practices that senior security and procurement leaders can deploy to maximize value from managed security service partnerships
Industry leaders can accelerate security program effectiveness by aligning sourcing decisions with clear operational outcomes and governance guardrails. First, prioritize capability mapping: define the security functions that must remain in-house for strategic control and identify routine monitoring and triage activities appropriate for outsourcing. This approach preserves institutional knowledge while unlocking provider scale for repetitive tasks. Next, adopt standardized integration and data exchange patterns to ensure seamless interoperability between vendor platforms and internal tooling; prioritize APIs, playbook compatibility, and shared telemetry schemas to reduce friction and support automated response.
Leaders should also insist on outcome-focused SLAs that map to measurable detection and response metrics rather than broad availability assurances. Construct contractual clauses that clarify roles for incident escalation, evidence preservation, and regulatory notification to reduce ambiguity during high-stakes events. From a procurement lens, evaluate providers on their ability to operate in co-managed modes and provide repeatable onboarding frameworks that decrease time-to-value. Finally, invest in governance mechanisms that maintain executive visibility into outsourced operations through executive dashboards, quarterly risk reviews, and joint tabletop exercises. These practices will increase resilience, optimize total cost of ownership, and enable continuous improvement across security operations.
A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining technical assessments, practitioner interviews, vendor questionnaires, and compliance mapping to ensure robust insights
This research synthesized insights from structured vendor assessments, technical capability mapping, practitioner interviews, and a review of publicly available regulatory guidance to form a holistic picture of the managed security services landscape. Technical assessments examined orchestration maturity, detection engineering practices, threat intelligence integration, and deployment flexibility across cloud and on-premises environments. Practitioner interviews illuminated real-world operational trade-offs associated with co-managed versus fully-managed engagements, the efficacy of runbooks in reducing mean-time-to-respond, and the procurement challenges associated with multisource architectures.
To ensure robustness, vendor questionnaires probed service-level commitments, onboarding practices, integration APIs, and escalation protocols, while case studies evaluated outcomes from incident response engagements and remediation projects. Risk and compliance reviews mapped regional and sectoral regulatory obligations to recommended service attributes. Throughout the analysis, cross-validation between interview inputs and technical assessments mitigated single-source bias and highlighted consistent patterns of buyer preference. The methodology emphasizes transparency around assumptions and systematically documents capability differentials to support informed buyer decisions and vendor comparisons.
A strategic summation linking operational reality, provider capability evolution, and governance imperatives to guide security leaders in extracting real strategic value from managed services
In a landscape marked by accelerated cloud adoption, sophisticated threat actors, and evolving regulatory expectations, managed security services have emerged as a pragmatic lever for organizations to maintain robust defensive postures while managing talent and cost constraints. The cumulative effect of technological shifts, procurement pressures, and policy dynamics underscores the importance of flexible engagement models, transparent operational metrics, and strong governance. Buyers that align sourcing strategies to specific risk appetites and operational realities will secure better outcomes and reduce exposure to supply chain and policy-driven disruptions.
As providers continue to invest in automation, analytics, and vertical specialization, the market will favor those that demonstrate consistent operational performance, integration ease, and the ability to evolve service playbooks in response to new attack techniques. For security leaders, the path forward requires disciplined capability mapping, rigorous vendor evaluation anchored in measurable outcomes, and governance frameworks that preserve strategic control while leveraging external scale. Those who act decisively will convert managed security services from a cost line item into a strategic asset that enhances resilience and enables safe digital transformation.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
186 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of extended detection and response services across endpoints, networks, and cloud environments enabling unified threat management
- 5.2. Integration of artificial intelligence driven security analytics for proactive threat hunting and automated incident response
- 5.3. Deployment of zero trust managed detection and response architectures to minimize lateral movement risk
- 5.4. Expansion of managed security services focusing on operational technology protection for critical infrastructure environments
- 5.5. Acceleration of managed cloud native security offerings to secure multi cloud infrastructures and workloads
- 5.6. Enhanced compliance automation and continuous monitoring services to address evolving regulatory and privacy requirements
- 5.7. Emergence of managed identity and access management services leveraging behavioral analytics for risk adaptive authentication
- 5.8. Growth of managed security orchestration and automation capabilities to streamline incident response workflows and remediation
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Managed Security Services Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Managed Detection & Response
- 8.2. Managed Firewall
- 8.3. Managed Identity & Access Management
- 8.4. Managed Risk & Compliance Management
- 8.5. Managed SIEM & Log Management
- 8.6. Managed Vulnerability Management
- 9. Managed Security Services Market, by Type
- 9.1. Co-Managed Security Service
- 9.2. Fully-Managed Security Services
- 10. Managed Security Services Market, by Security Type
- 10.1. Application Security
- 10.2. Cloud Security
- 10.3. Endpoint Security
- 10.4. Network Security
- 11. Managed Security Services Market, by Deployment
- 11.1. On-Cloud
- 11.2. On-Premises
- 12. Managed Security Services Market, by Organization Size
- 12.1. Large Enterprises
- 12.2. Small and Medium Enterprises
- 13. Managed Security Services Market, by Industry Vertical
- 13.1. Aerospace & Defense
- 13.2. Banking, Financial Services & Insurance
- 13.3. Energy & Utilities
- 13.4. Government & Public Sector
- 13.5. Healthcare
- 13.6. IT & Telecommunications
- 13.7. Manufacturing
- 13.8. Retail
- 14. Managed Security Services Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Managed Security Services Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Managed Security Services Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Accenture PLC
- 17.3.2. Alert Logic, Inc. by Fortra
- 17.3.3. Ascend Technologies
- 17.3.4. AT&T Inc.
- 17.3.5. Atos SE
- 17.3.6. BAE Systems plc
- 17.3.7. Broadcom Inc.
- 17.3.8. Capgemini Services SAS
- 17.3.9. CenturyLink, Inc.
- 17.3.10. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.11. CrowdStrike
- 17.3.12. DXC Technology Company
- 17.3.13. Fortinet, Inc.
- 17.3.14. Happiest Minds Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
- 17.3.15. International Business Machines Corporation
- 17.3.16. Kyndryl Inc.
- 17.3.17. Lumen Technologies
- 17.3.18. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
- 17.3.19. Netsurion LLC
- 17.3.20. NTT Ltd.
- 17.3.21. Optiv Security Inc.
- 17.3.22. Tata Communications Limited
- 17.3.23. Trustwave Holdings, Inc.
- 17.3.24. Unisys Corporation
- 17.3.25. Wipro Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
