Managed Detection & Response Market by Component (Services, Solutions), Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small And Medium Enterprises), Deployment Model, End User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Managed Detection & Response Market was valued at USD 5.72 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 6.70 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 17.40%, reaching USD 20.66 billion by 2032.
A compelling overview of why managed detection and response has become an indispensable operational layer for organizations prioritizing continuous threat detection and resilient response
The Managed Detection and Response (MDR) landscape has moved from niche service to strategic imperative for organizations confronting a rapidly evolving cyber threat environment. Enterprises and smaller organizations alike are demanding continuous, outcome-driven security operations that combine human expertise with advanced automation to detect, investigate, and remediate threats across complex, hybrid estates. This introduction frames why MDR has become central to security architectures, the distinct value propositions that vendors are delivering, and the operational considerations that buyers must weigh when integrating MDR into broader security and business continuity plans.
As threat actors diversify tactics and leverage supply chain weaknesses, boards and executive teams are increasingly focused on measurable risk reduction rather than technology procurement alone. Consequently, MDR offerings are being evaluated not purely on detection efficacy but on how they integrate with incident response playbooks, forensics, regulatory reporting, and business resilience. This section establishes the foundational context for the subsequent discussion by articulating the core capabilities that distinguish effective MDR programs, the interplay between managed services and platform-centric solutions, and the organizational shifts required to extract sustained value from outsourced detection and response engagements.
An in-depth look at the major technological, operational, and market forces reshaping managed detection and response and accelerating the move toward integrated, outcome-driven services
The last several years have produced transformative shifts in the MDR landscape that are reshaping vendor strategies and buyer expectations. Cloud-first enterprise architectures and hybrid deployments have broadened the attack surface, prompting MDR providers to expand telemetry ingestion across endpoints, cloud workloads, and network telemetry while deepening integrations with cloud service providers and native cloud security controls. Concurrently, advancements in automation, orchestration, and machine learning have allowed security operations to scale, enabling rapid triage and automated containment for common, well-understood threat patterns while reserving human analysts’ capacity for complex investigations.
At the same time, the convergence of Extended Detection and Response (XDR) principles with traditional MDR models has driven further consolidation of telemetry sources and prioritized context-rich investigations that reduce investigation times. Talent scarcity and the cost of experienced security analysts have accelerated investment in user augmentation technologies and remote SOC models that deliver 24/7 coverage through a mix of onshore and skilled offshore resources. Regulatory complexity and rising expectations for incident transparency have also pressured providers to enhance reporting, forensics, and legal coordination capabilities. Together, these shifts have elevated MDR from a reactive service to a strategic partner that helps organizations operationalize resilience and demonstrate measurable improvements in detection maturity.
A strategic assessment of how recent trade policy shifts and tariff measures have altered procurement dynamics, supplier risk profiles, and service delivery models across managed detection and response
Policy changes affecting import tariffs and related trade measures can produce ripple effects across the security services supply chain, particularly when hardware, appliances, or specialized equipment are sourced internationally. For MDR providers that rely on third-party appliances, hosted detection hardware, or regionally supplied forensic tools, tariff-driven increases in procurement costs can result in both higher operating expenses and more selective capital deployments. In response, vendors often accelerate software-first strategies and cloud-native tooling to decouple service delivery from hardware constraints, thereby preserving service levels while containing cost pressure.
Tariff-induced supplier dynamics also shape procurement and contractual arrangements with enterprise customers. Organizations that previously relied on bundled hardware-and-service offerings may negotiate more modular engagements, shifting toward subscription-based access to cloud-hosted detection platforms and managed analytics that minimize supply chain exposure. These changes can alter pricing negotiations and reshape total cost of ownership conversations, especially for small and medium enterprises that are more sensitive to cost volatility. Additionally, tariffs contribute to broader geopolitical risk considerations that security teams must integrate into vendor risk assessments, continuity planning, and contingency arrangements for incident response. The net effect is an industry that is adapting its operational model-prioritizing portability, interoperability, and supplier diversification-to mitigate the cumulative impact of trade policy shifts on security resilience and service continuity.
A comprehensive exploration of component, deployment model, organization size, and end-user industry segmentation that clarifies differentiated buyer needs and solution alignment
Understanding segmentation dynamics is essential to position MDR capabilities effectively across buyer types and technical requirements. Component-level considerations reveal a bifurcation between services and solutions: managed services emphasize continuous operational capabilities, including 24/7 monitoring, incident response, managed forensics, and threat intelligence and analysis, while professional services focus on consulting, integration and implementation, and support and maintenance. Solutions-oriented components trend toward platform and tool delivery that enable customers to retain more control of detection workflows while leveraging vendor analytics and telemetry normalization.
Deployment model segmentation matters because cloud-native architectures, hybrid estates, and on-premises environments each demand distinct instrumentation, data residency controls, and integration approaches; public and private cloud nuances further influence telemetry availability and incident response techniques. Organization size influences buyer priorities and buying processes: large enterprises typically prioritize integration, compliance, and bespoke SLAs, whereas small and medium enterprises-spanning both medium and small enterprises-seek turnkey, cost-effective MDR packages and simplified operational handoffs. End-user industry segmentation highlights divergent threat profiles and regulatory obligations across banking, financial services and insurance, energy and utilities, government and defense, healthcare, IT and telecom, manufacturing, and retail and e-commerce, with each vertical demanding specialized detection content, playbooks, and compliance-aligned reporting. These segmentation lenses collectively shape product roadmaps, go-to-market strategies, and partnership models for vendors seeking to deliver differentiated MDR outcomes.
A region-focused analysis revealing how geographic regulatory regimes, operational maturity, and localized threat environments influence managed detection and response delivery and demand
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on how MDR services are consumed, regulated, and delivered across geographies. In the Americas, maturity of security operations and advanced threat activity drive significant demand for integrated managed services that combine 24/7 monitoring, incident response, and regulatory-aligned forensics; North American regulatory initiatives and corporate governance expectations further push enterprises toward demonstrable incident readiness and partnership-based approaches with service providers. Europe, the Middle East & Africa presents a fragmented regulatory environment and a wide spectrum of maturity, where stringent data protection laws and sector-specific mandates create demand for localization, data residency, and specialized compliance services, particularly in government, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid cloud adoption, digital transformation programs across telecommunications and manufacturing, and rising investments in in-region security capabilities. Market diversity within this geography means providers must balance scalable, cloud-first delivery models with localized threat intelligence and multilingual incident handling. Across all regions, regional incident response capacity, talent availability, and legal disclosure requirements shape how vendors structure service delivery, partner ecosystems, and escalation frameworks, leading to a growing emphasis on regional SOC availability, cross-border playbook harmonization, and contractual clarity about data handling and investigative authority.
A nuanced appraisal of competitive behaviors and vendor capabilities that identifies pathways for differentiation through technology integration, service depth, and vertical specialization
Competitive dynamics among MDR vendors are driven by differentiation across service depth, technological integration, and vertical competency. Leading providers are investing in richer telemetry fusion, extended integration with cloud provider-native controls, and specialized content packs that align with industry-specific threat models. Strategic partnerships with cloud platforms, endpoint vendors, and threat intelligence providers amplify detection coverage and enable faster containment, while acquisitions and alliances continue to reshape the vendor landscape and expand capabilities such as managed forensics and bespoke incident response retainers.
Buyers are increasingly attuned to vendor transparency around detection coverage, mean time to detect versus mean time to respond, and how escalation to human analysts is managed. Service-level differentiation also emerges through delivery models-some vendors emphasize full managed SOC operations, others provide co-managed platforms that enable an in-house team to retain control of remediation decisions. Professional services competencies, including consulting and integration, are pivotal in complex environments that require tailored playbooks and deep application or OT visibility. In this environment, vendors that demonstrate consistent operational rigor, validated incident outcomes, and clear pathways for compliance reporting gain traction with enterprise buyers, while those offering streamlined, cost-effective bundles cater to budget-conscious small and medium enterprises.
Actionable strategic initiatives that security executives and providers can implement to strengthen operational resilience, optimize delivery, and drive differentiated managed detection and response outcomes
Industry leaders should pursue a balanced strategy that blends automation, human expertise, and customer-centric engagement to scale MDR effectiveness while controlling costs. Prioritizing a software-first architecture reduces dependency on imported appliances and enhances portability across cloud and on-premises environments, enabling faster deployment and simplified vendor switching when necessary. Simultaneously, investing in advanced automation and playbook-driven response reduces mean time to containment for common incidents, freeing analysts to focus on high-complexity investigations that require contextual judgment.
Operationally, leaders must strengthen vendor risk management and supply chain resilience by diversifying suppliers, contractualizing contingency support, and insisting on transparent component provenance. Sales and product teams should refine offerings to address organization-size differences: modular packages that combine essential 24/7 monitoring with add-on professional services appeal to small and medium enterprises, while bespoke integrations and compliance-focused reporting resonate with large enterprises. To remain competitive, cultivate deep industry domain expertise for verticals such as financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, and build rich threat intelligence feeds and incident playbooks tailored to those sectors. Finally, invest in talent pipelines and analyst enablement through continuous training, cross-certification, and retention incentives, ensuring that automation amplifies rather than replaces human investigatory judgment.
A transparent and reproducible research approach that combines practitioner interviews, public-domain analysis, and cross-validated synthesis to produce actionable market intelligence
The research underpinning this analysis uses a blended methodology designed to triangulate qualitative and quantitative inputs while maintaining rigor and reproducibility. Primary research included structured interviews and briefings with security executives, managed service providers, SOC managers, and industry practitioners to capture firsthand perspectives on service delivery models, operational challenges, and procurement drivers. Secondary research involved an exhaustive review of public regulatory guidance, vendor technical documentation, incident disclosure reports, and domain literature to contextualize practitioner insights and identify common patterns.
Findings were validated through cross-verification with multiple independent sources, thematic coding of interview transcripts, and synthesis into a coherent taxonomy covering components, deployment models, organization size, and industry verticals. Care was taken to ensure methodological transparency: segmentation definitions are explicitly documented, assumptions and inclusion criteria are stated, and limitations-such as reliance on volunteered data and evolving policy landscapes-are acknowledged. Ethical considerations guided the treatment of sensitive incident data and anonymized sources. This methodological approach provides a defensible basis for the analysis and practical guidance presented throughout the report.
A concise synthesis of how managed detection and response must evolve to deliver measurable resilience and operational advantage across complex enterprise environments
Effective managed detection and response is no longer a purely tactical purchase; it is a strategic function that underwrites organizational resilience and operational continuity in the face of persistent, sophisticated threats. The collective evidence underscores that buyers value demonstrable outcomes-speed of detection, depth of investigation, clarity of remediation guidance, and regulatory-ready forensics-over feature checklists alone. Providers that align technical depth with practical, sector-specific playbooks and robust delivery processes will be best positioned to meet this demand.
Looking ahead, the ability to rapidly integrate new telemetry, scale automation without sacrificing analyst oversight, and adapt contractual structures in response to supply chain and policy shifts will differentiate market leaders. Organizations procuring MDR should prioritize transparency, measurable SLAs, and alignment to internal incident response capabilities. In sum, MDR should be viewed as an extensible capability that augments internal teams, supports compliance obligations, and materially reduces operational exposure when delivered with rigor and sector relevance.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A compelling overview of why managed detection and response has become an indispensable operational layer for organizations prioritizing continuous threat detection and resilient response
The Managed Detection and Response (MDR) landscape has moved from niche service to strategic imperative for organizations confronting a rapidly evolving cyber threat environment. Enterprises and smaller organizations alike are demanding continuous, outcome-driven security operations that combine human expertise with advanced automation to detect, investigate, and remediate threats across complex, hybrid estates. This introduction frames why MDR has become central to security architectures, the distinct value propositions that vendors are delivering, and the operational considerations that buyers must weigh when integrating MDR into broader security and business continuity plans.
As threat actors diversify tactics and leverage supply chain weaknesses, boards and executive teams are increasingly focused on measurable risk reduction rather than technology procurement alone. Consequently, MDR offerings are being evaluated not purely on detection efficacy but on how they integrate with incident response playbooks, forensics, regulatory reporting, and business resilience. This section establishes the foundational context for the subsequent discussion by articulating the core capabilities that distinguish effective MDR programs, the interplay between managed services and platform-centric solutions, and the organizational shifts required to extract sustained value from outsourced detection and response engagements.
An in-depth look at the major technological, operational, and market forces reshaping managed detection and response and accelerating the move toward integrated, outcome-driven services
The last several years have produced transformative shifts in the MDR landscape that are reshaping vendor strategies and buyer expectations. Cloud-first enterprise architectures and hybrid deployments have broadened the attack surface, prompting MDR providers to expand telemetry ingestion across endpoints, cloud workloads, and network telemetry while deepening integrations with cloud service providers and native cloud security controls. Concurrently, advancements in automation, orchestration, and machine learning have allowed security operations to scale, enabling rapid triage and automated containment for common, well-understood threat patterns while reserving human analysts’ capacity for complex investigations.
At the same time, the convergence of Extended Detection and Response (XDR) principles with traditional MDR models has driven further consolidation of telemetry sources and prioritized context-rich investigations that reduce investigation times. Talent scarcity and the cost of experienced security analysts have accelerated investment in user augmentation technologies and remote SOC models that deliver 24/7 coverage through a mix of onshore and skilled offshore resources. Regulatory complexity and rising expectations for incident transparency have also pressured providers to enhance reporting, forensics, and legal coordination capabilities. Together, these shifts have elevated MDR from a reactive service to a strategic partner that helps organizations operationalize resilience and demonstrate measurable improvements in detection maturity.
A strategic assessment of how recent trade policy shifts and tariff measures have altered procurement dynamics, supplier risk profiles, and service delivery models across managed detection and response
Policy changes affecting import tariffs and related trade measures can produce ripple effects across the security services supply chain, particularly when hardware, appliances, or specialized equipment are sourced internationally. For MDR providers that rely on third-party appliances, hosted detection hardware, or regionally supplied forensic tools, tariff-driven increases in procurement costs can result in both higher operating expenses and more selective capital deployments. In response, vendors often accelerate software-first strategies and cloud-native tooling to decouple service delivery from hardware constraints, thereby preserving service levels while containing cost pressure.
Tariff-induced supplier dynamics also shape procurement and contractual arrangements with enterprise customers. Organizations that previously relied on bundled hardware-and-service offerings may negotiate more modular engagements, shifting toward subscription-based access to cloud-hosted detection platforms and managed analytics that minimize supply chain exposure. These changes can alter pricing negotiations and reshape total cost of ownership conversations, especially for small and medium enterprises that are more sensitive to cost volatility. Additionally, tariffs contribute to broader geopolitical risk considerations that security teams must integrate into vendor risk assessments, continuity planning, and contingency arrangements for incident response. The net effect is an industry that is adapting its operational model-prioritizing portability, interoperability, and supplier diversification-to mitigate the cumulative impact of trade policy shifts on security resilience and service continuity.
A comprehensive exploration of component, deployment model, organization size, and end-user industry segmentation that clarifies differentiated buyer needs and solution alignment
Understanding segmentation dynamics is essential to position MDR capabilities effectively across buyer types and technical requirements. Component-level considerations reveal a bifurcation between services and solutions: managed services emphasize continuous operational capabilities, including 24/7 monitoring, incident response, managed forensics, and threat intelligence and analysis, while professional services focus on consulting, integration and implementation, and support and maintenance. Solutions-oriented components trend toward platform and tool delivery that enable customers to retain more control of detection workflows while leveraging vendor analytics and telemetry normalization.
Deployment model segmentation matters because cloud-native architectures, hybrid estates, and on-premises environments each demand distinct instrumentation, data residency controls, and integration approaches; public and private cloud nuances further influence telemetry availability and incident response techniques. Organization size influences buyer priorities and buying processes: large enterprises typically prioritize integration, compliance, and bespoke SLAs, whereas small and medium enterprises-spanning both medium and small enterprises-seek turnkey, cost-effective MDR packages and simplified operational handoffs. End-user industry segmentation highlights divergent threat profiles and regulatory obligations across banking, financial services and insurance, energy and utilities, government and defense, healthcare, IT and telecom, manufacturing, and retail and e-commerce, with each vertical demanding specialized detection content, playbooks, and compliance-aligned reporting. These segmentation lenses collectively shape product roadmaps, go-to-market strategies, and partnership models for vendors seeking to deliver differentiated MDR outcomes.
A region-focused analysis revealing how geographic regulatory regimes, operational maturity, and localized threat environments influence managed detection and response delivery and demand
Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on how MDR services are consumed, regulated, and delivered across geographies. In the Americas, maturity of security operations and advanced threat activity drive significant demand for integrated managed services that combine 24/7 monitoring, incident response, and regulatory-aligned forensics; North American regulatory initiatives and corporate governance expectations further push enterprises toward demonstrable incident readiness and partnership-based approaches with service providers. Europe, the Middle East & Africa presents a fragmented regulatory environment and a wide spectrum of maturity, where stringent data protection laws and sector-specific mandates create demand for localization, data residency, and specialized compliance services, particularly in government, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid cloud adoption, digital transformation programs across telecommunications and manufacturing, and rising investments in in-region security capabilities. Market diversity within this geography means providers must balance scalable, cloud-first delivery models with localized threat intelligence and multilingual incident handling. Across all regions, regional incident response capacity, talent availability, and legal disclosure requirements shape how vendors structure service delivery, partner ecosystems, and escalation frameworks, leading to a growing emphasis on regional SOC availability, cross-border playbook harmonization, and contractual clarity about data handling and investigative authority.
A nuanced appraisal of competitive behaviors and vendor capabilities that identifies pathways for differentiation through technology integration, service depth, and vertical specialization
Competitive dynamics among MDR vendors are driven by differentiation across service depth, technological integration, and vertical competency. Leading providers are investing in richer telemetry fusion, extended integration with cloud provider-native controls, and specialized content packs that align with industry-specific threat models. Strategic partnerships with cloud platforms, endpoint vendors, and threat intelligence providers amplify detection coverage and enable faster containment, while acquisitions and alliances continue to reshape the vendor landscape and expand capabilities such as managed forensics and bespoke incident response retainers.
Buyers are increasingly attuned to vendor transparency around detection coverage, mean time to detect versus mean time to respond, and how escalation to human analysts is managed. Service-level differentiation also emerges through delivery models-some vendors emphasize full managed SOC operations, others provide co-managed platforms that enable an in-house team to retain control of remediation decisions. Professional services competencies, including consulting and integration, are pivotal in complex environments that require tailored playbooks and deep application or OT visibility. In this environment, vendors that demonstrate consistent operational rigor, validated incident outcomes, and clear pathways for compliance reporting gain traction with enterprise buyers, while those offering streamlined, cost-effective bundles cater to budget-conscious small and medium enterprises.
Actionable strategic initiatives that security executives and providers can implement to strengthen operational resilience, optimize delivery, and drive differentiated managed detection and response outcomes
Industry leaders should pursue a balanced strategy that blends automation, human expertise, and customer-centric engagement to scale MDR effectiveness while controlling costs. Prioritizing a software-first architecture reduces dependency on imported appliances and enhances portability across cloud and on-premises environments, enabling faster deployment and simplified vendor switching when necessary. Simultaneously, investing in advanced automation and playbook-driven response reduces mean time to containment for common incidents, freeing analysts to focus on high-complexity investigations that require contextual judgment.
Operationally, leaders must strengthen vendor risk management and supply chain resilience by diversifying suppliers, contractualizing contingency support, and insisting on transparent component provenance. Sales and product teams should refine offerings to address organization-size differences: modular packages that combine essential 24/7 monitoring with add-on professional services appeal to small and medium enterprises, while bespoke integrations and compliance-focused reporting resonate with large enterprises. To remain competitive, cultivate deep industry domain expertise for verticals such as financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, and build rich threat intelligence feeds and incident playbooks tailored to those sectors. Finally, invest in talent pipelines and analyst enablement through continuous training, cross-certification, and retention incentives, ensuring that automation amplifies rather than replaces human investigatory judgment.
A transparent and reproducible research approach that combines practitioner interviews, public-domain analysis, and cross-validated synthesis to produce actionable market intelligence
The research underpinning this analysis uses a blended methodology designed to triangulate qualitative and quantitative inputs while maintaining rigor and reproducibility. Primary research included structured interviews and briefings with security executives, managed service providers, SOC managers, and industry practitioners to capture firsthand perspectives on service delivery models, operational challenges, and procurement drivers. Secondary research involved an exhaustive review of public regulatory guidance, vendor technical documentation, incident disclosure reports, and domain literature to contextualize practitioner insights and identify common patterns.
Findings were validated through cross-verification with multiple independent sources, thematic coding of interview transcripts, and synthesis into a coherent taxonomy covering components, deployment models, organization size, and industry verticals. Care was taken to ensure methodological transparency: segmentation definitions are explicitly documented, assumptions and inclusion criteria are stated, and limitations-such as reliance on volunteered data and evolving policy landscapes-are acknowledged. Ethical considerations guided the treatment of sensitive incident data and anonymized sources. This methodological approach provides a defensible basis for the analysis and practical guidance presented throughout the report.
A concise synthesis of how managed detection and response must evolve to deliver measurable resilience and operational advantage across complex enterprise environments
Effective managed detection and response is no longer a purely tactical purchase; it is a strategic function that underwrites organizational resilience and operational continuity in the face of persistent, sophisticated threats. The collective evidence underscores that buyers value demonstrable outcomes-speed of detection, depth of investigation, clarity of remediation guidance, and regulatory-ready forensics-over feature checklists alone. Providers that align technical depth with practical, sector-specific playbooks and robust delivery processes will be best positioned to meet this demand.
Looking ahead, the ability to rapidly integrate new telemetry, scale automation without sacrificing analyst oversight, and adapt contractual structures in response to supply chain and policy shifts will differentiate market leaders. Organizations procuring MDR should prioritize transparency, measurable SLAs, and alignment to internal incident response capabilities. In sum, MDR should be viewed as an extensible capability that augments internal teams, supports compliance obligations, and materially reduces operational exposure when delivered with rigor and sector relevance.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
197 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-driven threat hunting with real-time behavioral analytics in MDR platforms
- 5.2. Expansion of cloud-native MDR solutions tailored for secure multi-region and hybrid environments
- 5.3. Growing adoption of zero trust architecture within MDR services to prevent lateral movement in attacks
- 5.4. Leveraging extended detection and response integration to unify endpoint network cloud telemetry
- 5.5. Customization of industry-specific threat intelligence feeds to enhance proactive MDR response accuracy
- 5.6. Incorporation of automated incident response orchestration to reduce mean time to containment
- 5.7. Rising focus on compliance-driven MDR offerings with built-in GDPR HIPAA and PCI DSS reporting
- 5.8. Deployment of behavioral biometrics and user entity analytics for identity-focused threat detection
- 5.9. Integration of deception technology decoys within MDR strategies to mislead and trap sophisticated attackers
- 5.10. Utilization of threat hunting playbooks powered by machine learning for continuous adaptive security improvements
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Managed Detection & Response Market, by Component
- 8.1. Services
- 8.1.1. Managed Services
- 8.1.1.1. 24/7 Monitoring
- 8.1.1.2. Incident Response
- 8.1.1.3. Managed Forensics
- 8.1.1.4. Threat Intelligence & Analysis
- 8.1.2. Professional Services
- 8.1.2.1. Consulting
- 8.1.2.2. Integration & Implementation
- 8.1.2.3. Support & Maintenance
- 8.2. Solutions
- 8.2.1. Platforms
- 8.2.2. Tools
- 9. Managed Detection & Response Market, by Organization Size
- 9.1. Large Enterprises
- 9.2. Small And Medium Enterprises
- 10. Managed Detection & Response Market, by Deployment Model
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.1.1. Private Cloud
- 10.1.2. Public Cloud
- 10.2. Hybrid
- 10.3. On Premises
- 11. Managed Detection & Response Market, by End User Industry
- 11.1. BFSI
- 11.2. Energy & Utilities
- 11.3. Government & Defense
- 11.4. Healthcare
- 11.5. It & Telecom
- 11.6. Manufacturing
- 11.7. Retail & E-commerce
- 12. Managed Detection & Response Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Managed Detection & Response Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Managed Detection & Response Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. Accenture PLC
- 15.3.2. Alert Logic by Fortra, LLC
- 15.3.3. Amazon.com, Inc.
- 15.3.4. AT&T Inc.
- 15.3.5. Atos SE
- 15.3.6. Broadcom Inc.
- 15.3.7. Cipher
- 15.3.8. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 15.3.9. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
- 15.3.10. Dell Inc.
- 15.3.11. Fidelis Cybersecurity, Inc.
- 15.3.12. Fujitsu Limited
- 15.3.13. Google LLC by Alphabet Inc
- 15.3.14. HCL Technologies
- 15.3.15. Herjavec Group Inc.
- 15.3.16. Hitachi Ltd
- 15.3.17. International Business Machines Corporation
- 15.3.18. Lumen Technologies, Inc.
- 15.3.19. Netrix, LLC
- 15.3.20. Oracle Corp.
- 15.3.21. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
- 15.3.22. Secureworks Inc.
- 15.3.23. Sophos Lts
- 15.3.24. Tata Consultancy Services
- 15.3.25. Trend Micro Incorporated.
- 15.3.26. Trustwave Holdings, Inc.
- 15.3.27. Vectra AI, Inc.
- 15.3.28. Verizon Communications Inc.
- 15.3.29. Wipro Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
