Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market by Technology Type (Kalina Cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle, Stirling Engine), Temperature Range (100°C To 150°C, 150°C To 200°C, Above 200°C), Power Output, Ownership Model, End-Use Industry, Applicat
Description
The Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market was valued at USD 1.07 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.18 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 10.40%, reaching USD 2.15 billion by 2032.
Introducing low-temperature waste-heat power systems as a strategic lever for operational efficiency, emissions reduction, and resilient distributed energy generation
The energy landscape is undergoing a quiet but decisive transition as industrial operators, utilities, and project developers seek to extract value from heat streams previously considered waste. Low-temperature waste-heat power generation systems convert available thermal energy from sources such as process exhaust, geothermal brine, and solar thermal collectors into usable electricity, enabling organizations to improve overall energy efficiency while reducing reliance on grid-supplied power. This executive summary frames the technology, commercial drivers, and operational considerations that define adoption pathways for these systems.
Across manufacturing and energy-intensive sectors, motivations for deployment extend beyond direct fuel savings. Organizations are prioritizing resilience, emissions reduction, and compliance with evolving regulatory regimes. Advances in working fluids, heat exchanger design, and modular plant engineering have narrowed the performance gap between lower-temperature sources and economically viable power output, enabling a broader set of applications. The remainder of this summary synthesizes recent shifts in the competitive and policy landscape, identifies segmentation- and region-specific dynamics, and presents recommendations designed to accelerate deployment while mitigating technical and market risks.
How recent technological breakthroughs, emerging policy levers, and corporate decarbonization mandates are reshaping deployment pathways for waste-heat power systems
The landscape for low-temperature waste-heat recovery has shifted from pilot-stage experimentation toward scalable deployment driven by three converging forces: technological maturation, policy incentives, and shifting corporate priorities. Improvements in Organic Rankine Cycle configurations, advanced heat exchangers, and controls have increased net electrical yields at lower inlet temperatures, while modular manufacturing approaches have reduced installation complexity and lead times. These technical advances are unlocking opportunities in sectors that traditionally regarded waste heat as unrecoverable.
Policy and regulatory frameworks in several jurisdictions now recognize waste-heat recovery as an eligible measure for emissions accounting and, in some cases, financial incentives. Corporate commitments to decarbonization and energy resilience are translating into procurement specifications that prioritize on-site generation and circular energy strategies. As a result, project development pipelines increasingly emphasize integrated solutions that combine heat recovery with other distributed energy resources. This combination of improved technology, supportive policy, and corporate demand is creating favorable conditions for accelerated commercial adoption.
Navigating the 2025 tariff landscape and its strategic consequences for procurement, supply chain resilience, and localized manufacturing capacity
The introduction and recalibration of tariffs in 2025 have had a material impact on procurement strategies, supply chain resilience, and project economics for capital-intensive energy equipment. Tariff adjustments that affect key components such as turbines, heat exchangers, and specialized controls are prompting buyers to revisit sourcing strategies, evaluate local content requirements, and assess alternative suppliers across multiple geographies. This reorientation is increasing the importance of supply chain visibility and strengthening the business case for localized assembly and modularization.
In response, equipment manufacturers and developers are accelerating dual-sourcing strategies and qualifying regional vendors to protect project timelines. Some OEMs are redesigning components to reduce reliance on tariff-exposed parts while preserving performance and reliability. Financial stakeholders and project sponsors are incorporating tariff risk into contracting structures and schedule contingencies. At the same time, opportunities are emerging for regional suppliers to capture incremental volume by aligning production capacity with evolving standards and certification requirements. Overall, tariff dynamics in 2025 underscore the need for strategic procurement planning, flexible engineering designs, and proactive stakeholder engagement to sustain deployment momentum.
Segment-driven insights that align technology choices, application requirements, and commercial models across temperature ranges, outputs, and industry use cases
A rigorous segmentation approach provides the analytical foundation for targeted commercialization and technology development. Based on technology type, the landscape spans Kalina Cycle systems, Organic Rankine Cycle configurations, Stirling Engines, and Supercritical CO2 Cycles, with the Organic Rankine Cycle further differentiated into multi-stage and single-stage variants to address diverse temperature and output profiles. Based on end-use industry, adoption pathways and technical requirements vary across chemicals, food and beverage processing, manufacturing, and oil and gas operations, each of which presents distinct heat quality profiles, operational cadences, and regulatory considerations.
Based on temperature range, projects target heat sources below 100°C up to ranges between 100°C to 150°C, 150°C to 200°C, and above 200°C, with technology selection closely linked to resource temperature and fluid compatibility. Based on power output, solutions are segmented into sub-megawatt systems below 1 MW, mid-tier 1 to 5 MW installations, and larger plants above 5 MW, translating into different engineering and commercialization models. Based on application, systems are deployed for exhaust gas recovery, geothermal supplementation, process heat recovery, and solar thermal integration, each application informing heat exchanger design and system control strategies. Based on installation type, choices between mobile, modular, and on-site installations influence project timelines, permitting processes, and operational flexibility. Based on ownership model, leased versus owned configurations alter financing, warranty, and lifecycle service models. Based on sales channel, aftermarket and original equipment manufacturer pathways determine how performance guarantees, spare parts logistics, and service contracts are structured.
These intersecting segmentation dimensions inform technology roadmaps, commercial models, and go-to-market strategies. For example, a multi-stage ORC solution intended for continuous chemical plant operation will require a different engineering and service model than a modular ORC system deployed for intermittent solar thermal augmentation. Understanding these nuances allows suppliers and end users to align technical performance with business objectives and regulatory obligations.
Regional dynamics and deployment pathways shaped by policy frameworks, industrial structures, and local supply chain strengths across major global regions
Regional dynamics strongly influence technology adoption, supply chain configuration, and policy risk. In the Americas, incentives for energy efficiency and strong industrial end-use demand are encouraging early adopters, particularly in sectors with consistent high-temperature streams and established capital expenditure processes. The regulatory landscape in parts of the region is increasingly favorable to on-site generation and resilience investments, and local manufacturing capacity is expanding to meet demand for modular and customizable systems.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency on emissions and ambitious decarbonization targets are driving greater interest in integrated energy solutions, with a focus on compliance and lifecycle emissions accounting. The region’s diverse industrial base and varying infrastructure maturity create heterogeneous opportunities, from retrofit projects in established industrial centers to greenfield integrations in energy-exporting economies. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, high energy demand growth, and a strong focus on energy security underpin significant interest in waste-heat recovery, particularly in manufacturing clusters and heavy industry corridors. Local policy mechanisms and public-private partnerships are playing an increasing role in scaling pilot projects into commercial deployments. Across all regions, developers must balance regulatory alignment, local content expectations, and logistics considerations when planning deployments.
Competitive differentiation driven by cycle efficiency improvements, proprietary thermal hardware, and service models that de-risk long-term operations
The competitive landscape is comprised of technology developers, equipment manufacturers, engineering firms, and integrators that span the value chain from component suppliers to full-system providers. Leading technical players are differentiating through improved thermodynamic cycles, proprietary heat exchanger designs, and integrated control systems that optimize part-load performance. Service differentiation is also emerging as a critical competitive axis, with extended warranties, performance-based contracts, and predictive maintenance offerings becoming determinants of procurement decisions.
Strategic partnerships between technology vendors and engineering procurement and construction firms are enabling faster site commissioning and more predictable lifecycle outcomes. Some companies are moving toward vertically integrated models to manage component supply risk and to ensure consistent quality standards, while others pursue channel partnerships to accelerate market reach. The intersection of technology innovation, service offerings, and supply chain strategy will determine market leadership, with agility and technical credibility serving as the primary competitive differentiators.
Actionable steps for technology, procurement, and commercial teams to accelerate adoption while mitigating supply chain and execution risks
Industry leaders should prioritize a coordinated strategy that addresses technology selection, supply chain resilience, and commercial model innovation. First, system architects and end users need to align technology choices to resource temperature, duty cycles, and integration complexity in order to maximize net delivered value. Second, procurement teams must implement supplier diversification and near-shoring options to reduce exposure to trade measures and logistic disruptions, while also qualifying regional partners for assembly and service delivery.
Third, commercial teams should expand offerings beyond equipment sales to include performance guarantees, leasing arrangements, and outcome-based contracting that align incentives across stakeholders. Fourth, engineering and operations groups must invest in digital monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities to extend asset life and improve uptime. Finally, leadership should engage proactively with regulators and local stakeholders to shape supportive policies and to streamline permitting pathways. These combined actions will accelerate deployment, reduce project execution risk, and unlock broader value from waste-heat resources.
Methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature, and standards validation to produce reproducible and operationally relevant insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews, technical literature, and validated secondary sources to construct a comprehensive view of technology, supply chain, and policy dynamics. Primary inputs include structured interviews with project developers, equipment manufacturers, EPC firms, and end users across industry verticals to capture real-world deployment drivers, failure modes, and service expectations. These inputs were triangulated with engineering reports, peer-reviewed publications, and standards documentation to ensure technical accuracy and to contextualize performance claims.
Data curation prioritized transparency in assumptions and traceability of sources. Qualitative insights were codified to reveal recurring patterns in technology selection, contracting models, and regional deployment barriers. Wherever possible, technical discussions were framed around thermodynamic principles, equipment lifecycle considerations, and operations and maintenance imperatives to support decision-ready recommendations. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility and practitioner relevance, ensuring that findings reflect operational realities and actionable insights for executives and engineering leaders.
Synthesis of technological, commercial, and policy imperatives that crystallize adoption pathways and practical actions for sustained deployment
Low-temperature waste-heat power generation systems represent a pragmatic pathway to extract latent value from thermal streams that have historically been underutilized. Advances across cycle design, heat transfer technology, and modular engineering have expanded the range of viable applications, enabling organizations to pursue resilience, emissions reduction, and operational cost savings in parallel. Strategic procurement, localized supply chain planning, and service-oriented commercial models will be central to converting technological potential into sustained, reliable deployments.
Looking forward, the pace of adoption will be influenced by regulatory clarity, capital availability for energy efficiency measures, and ongoing improvements in system integration and digital lifecycle management. Stakeholders who align technology selection with operational needs, proactively manage tariff and supplier risks, and embrace outcome-based contracting will be best positioned to realize the full benefits of waste-heat recovery. The evidence-based actions outlined here are designed to guide decision-makers through practical steps that reduce technical uncertainty and accelerate value delivery.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Introducing low-temperature waste-heat power systems as a strategic lever for operational efficiency, emissions reduction, and resilient distributed energy generation
The energy landscape is undergoing a quiet but decisive transition as industrial operators, utilities, and project developers seek to extract value from heat streams previously considered waste. Low-temperature waste-heat power generation systems convert available thermal energy from sources such as process exhaust, geothermal brine, and solar thermal collectors into usable electricity, enabling organizations to improve overall energy efficiency while reducing reliance on grid-supplied power. This executive summary frames the technology, commercial drivers, and operational considerations that define adoption pathways for these systems.
Across manufacturing and energy-intensive sectors, motivations for deployment extend beyond direct fuel savings. Organizations are prioritizing resilience, emissions reduction, and compliance with evolving regulatory regimes. Advances in working fluids, heat exchanger design, and modular plant engineering have narrowed the performance gap between lower-temperature sources and economically viable power output, enabling a broader set of applications. The remainder of this summary synthesizes recent shifts in the competitive and policy landscape, identifies segmentation- and region-specific dynamics, and presents recommendations designed to accelerate deployment while mitigating technical and market risks.
How recent technological breakthroughs, emerging policy levers, and corporate decarbonization mandates are reshaping deployment pathways for waste-heat power systems
The landscape for low-temperature waste-heat recovery has shifted from pilot-stage experimentation toward scalable deployment driven by three converging forces: technological maturation, policy incentives, and shifting corporate priorities. Improvements in Organic Rankine Cycle configurations, advanced heat exchangers, and controls have increased net electrical yields at lower inlet temperatures, while modular manufacturing approaches have reduced installation complexity and lead times. These technical advances are unlocking opportunities in sectors that traditionally regarded waste heat as unrecoverable.
Policy and regulatory frameworks in several jurisdictions now recognize waste-heat recovery as an eligible measure for emissions accounting and, in some cases, financial incentives. Corporate commitments to decarbonization and energy resilience are translating into procurement specifications that prioritize on-site generation and circular energy strategies. As a result, project development pipelines increasingly emphasize integrated solutions that combine heat recovery with other distributed energy resources. This combination of improved technology, supportive policy, and corporate demand is creating favorable conditions for accelerated commercial adoption.
Navigating the 2025 tariff landscape and its strategic consequences for procurement, supply chain resilience, and localized manufacturing capacity
The introduction and recalibration of tariffs in 2025 have had a material impact on procurement strategies, supply chain resilience, and project economics for capital-intensive energy equipment. Tariff adjustments that affect key components such as turbines, heat exchangers, and specialized controls are prompting buyers to revisit sourcing strategies, evaluate local content requirements, and assess alternative suppliers across multiple geographies. This reorientation is increasing the importance of supply chain visibility and strengthening the business case for localized assembly and modularization.
In response, equipment manufacturers and developers are accelerating dual-sourcing strategies and qualifying regional vendors to protect project timelines. Some OEMs are redesigning components to reduce reliance on tariff-exposed parts while preserving performance and reliability. Financial stakeholders and project sponsors are incorporating tariff risk into contracting structures and schedule contingencies. At the same time, opportunities are emerging for regional suppliers to capture incremental volume by aligning production capacity with evolving standards and certification requirements. Overall, tariff dynamics in 2025 underscore the need for strategic procurement planning, flexible engineering designs, and proactive stakeholder engagement to sustain deployment momentum.
Segment-driven insights that align technology choices, application requirements, and commercial models across temperature ranges, outputs, and industry use cases
A rigorous segmentation approach provides the analytical foundation for targeted commercialization and technology development. Based on technology type, the landscape spans Kalina Cycle systems, Organic Rankine Cycle configurations, Stirling Engines, and Supercritical CO2 Cycles, with the Organic Rankine Cycle further differentiated into multi-stage and single-stage variants to address diverse temperature and output profiles. Based on end-use industry, adoption pathways and technical requirements vary across chemicals, food and beverage processing, manufacturing, and oil and gas operations, each of which presents distinct heat quality profiles, operational cadences, and regulatory considerations.
Based on temperature range, projects target heat sources below 100°C up to ranges between 100°C to 150°C, 150°C to 200°C, and above 200°C, with technology selection closely linked to resource temperature and fluid compatibility. Based on power output, solutions are segmented into sub-megawatt systems below 1 MW, mid-tier 1 to 5 MW installations, and larger plants above 5 MW, translating into different engineering and commercialization models. Based on application, systems are deployed for exhaust gas recovery, geothermal supplementation, process heat recovery, and solar thermal integration, each application informing heat exchanger design and system control strategies. Based on installation type, choices between mobile, modular, and on-site installations influence project timelines, permitting processes, and operational flexibility. Based on ownership model, leased versus owned configurations alter financing, warranty, and lifecycle service models. Based on sales channel, aftermarket and original equipment manufacturer pathways determine how performance guarantees, spare parts logistics, and service contracts are structured.
These intersecting segmentation dimensions inform technology roadmaps, commercial models, and go-to-market strategies. For example, a multi-stage ORC solution intended for continuous chemical plant operation will require a different engineering and service model than a modular ORC system deployed for intermittent solar thermal augmentation. Understanding these nuances allows suppliers and end users to align technical performance with business objectives and regulatory obligations.
Regional dynamics and deployment pathways shaped by policy frameworks, industrial structures, and local supply chain strengths across major global regions
Regional dynamics strongly influence technology adoption, supply chain configuration, and policy risk. In the Americas, incentives for energy efficiency and strong industrial end-use demand are encouraging early adopters, particularly in sectors with consistent high-temperature streams and established capital expenditure processes. The regulatory landscape in parts of the region is increasingly favorable to on-site generation and resilience investments, and local manufacturing capacity is expanding to meet demand for modular and customizable systems.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory stringency on emissions and ambitious decarbonization targets are driving greater interest in integrated energy solutions, with a focus on compliance and lifecycle emissions accounting. The region’s diverse industrial base and varying infrastructure maturity create heterogeneous opportunities, from retrofit projects in established industrial centers to greenfield integrations in energy-exporting economies. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, high energy demand growth, and a strong focus on energy security underpin significant interest in waste-heat recovery, particularly in manufacturing clusters and heavy industry corridors. Local policy mechanisms and public-private partnerships are playing an increasing role in scaling pilot projects into commercial deployments. Across all regions, developers must balance regulatory alignment, local content expectations, and logistics considerations when planning deployments.
Competitive differentiation driven by cycle efficiency improvements, proprietary thermal hardware, and service models that de-risk long-term operations
The competitive landscape is comprised of technology developers, equipment manufacturers, engineering firms, and integrators that span the value chain from component suppliers to full-system providers. Leading technical players are differentiating through improved thermodynamic cycles, proprietary heat exchanger designs, and integrated control systems that optimize part-load performance. Service differentiation is also emerging as a critical competitive axis, with extended warranties, performance-based contracts, and predictive maintenance offerings becoming determinants of procurement decisions.
Strategic partnerships between technology vendors and engineering procurement and construction firms are enabling faster site commissioning and more predictable lifecycle outcomes. Some companies are moving toward vertically integrated models to manage component supply risk and to ensure consistent quality standards, while others pursue channel partnerships to accelerate market reach. The intersection of technology innovation, service offerings, and supply chain strategy will determine market leadership, with agility and technical credibility serving as the primary competitive differentiators.
Actionable steps for technology, procurement, and commercial teams to accelerate adoption while mitigating supply chain and execution risks
Industry leaders should prioritize a coordinated strategy that addresses technology selection, supply chain resilience, and commercial model innovation. First, system architects and end users need to align technology choices to resource temperature, duty cycles, and integration complexity in order to maximize net delivered value. Second, procurement teams must implement supplier diversification and near-shoring options to reduce exposure to trade measures and logistic disruptions, while also qualifying regional partners for assembly and service delivery.
Third, commercial teams should expand offerings beyond equipment sales to include performance guarantees, leasing arrangements, and outcome-based contracting that align incentives across stakeholders. Fourth, engineering and operations groups must invest in digital monitoring and predictive maintenance capabilities to extend asset life and improve uptime. Finally, leadership should engage proactively with regulators and local stakeholders to shape supportive policies and to streamline permitting pathways. These combined actions will accelerate deployment, reduce project execution risk, and unlock broader value from waste-heat resources.
Methodology combining primary stakeholder interviews, technical literature, and standards validation to produce reproducible and operationally relevant insights
This research synthesizes primary interviews, technical literature, and validated secondary sources to construct a comprehensive view of technology, supply chain, and policy dynamics. Primary inputs include structured interviews with project developers, equipment manufacturers, EPC firms, and end users across industry verticals to capture real-world deployment drivers, failure modes, and service expectations. These inputs were triangulated with engineering reports, peer-reviewed publications, and standards documentation to ensure technical accuracy and to contextualize performance claims.
Data curation prioritized transparency in assumptions and traceability of sources. Qualitative insights were codified to reveal recurring patterns in technology selection, contracting models, and regional deployment barriers. Wherever possible, technical discussions were framed around thermodynamic principles, equipment lifecycle considerations, and operations and maintenance imperatives to support decision-ready recommendations. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility and practitioner relevance, ensuring that findings reflect operational realities and actionable insights for executives and engineering leaders.
Synthesis of technological, commercial, and policy imperatives that crystallize adoption pathways and practical actions for sustained deployment
Low-temperature waste-heat power generation systems represent a pragmatic pathway to extract latent value from thermal streams that have historically been underutilized. Advances across cycle design, heat transfer technology, and modular engineering have expanded the range of viable applications, enabling organizations to pursue resilience, emissions reduction, and operational cost savings in parallel. Strategic procurement, localized supply chain planning, and service-oriented commercial models will be central to converting technological potential into sustained, reliable deployments.
Looking forward, the pace of adoption will be influenced by regulatory clarity, capital availability for energy efficiency measures, and ongoing improvements in system integration and digital lifecycle management. Stakeholders who align technology selection with operational needs, proactively manage tariff and supplier risks, and embrace outcome-based contracting will be best positioned to realize the full benefits of waste-heat recovery. The evidence-based actions outlined here are designed to guide decision-makers through practical steps that reduce technical uncertainty and accelerate value delivery.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Definition
- 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
- 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
- 1.7. Key Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Research Design
- 2.2.1. Primary Research
- 2.2.2. Secondary Research
- 2.3. Research Framework
- 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
- 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
- 2.4. Market Size Estimation
- 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
- 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.5. Data Triangulation
- 2.6. Research Outcomes
- 2.7. Research Assumptions
- 2.8. Research Limitations
- 3. Executive Summary
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. CXO Perspective
- 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
- 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
- 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
- 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
- 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
- 3.8. Industry Roadmap
- 4. Market Overview
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
- 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
- 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
- 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
- 4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
- 4.5. Market Outlook
- 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
- 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
- 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
- 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
- 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
- 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
- 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
- 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
- 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
- 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
- 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
- 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Technology Type
- 8.1. Kalina Cycle
- 8.2. Organic Rankine Cycle
- 8.2.1. Multi-Stage
- 8.2.2. Single-Stage
- 8.3. Stirling Engine
- 8.4. Supercritical CO2 Cycle
- 9. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Temperature Range
- 9.1. 100°C To 150°C
- 9.2. 150°C To 200°C
- 9.3. Above 200°C
- 9.4. Less Than 100°C
- 10. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Power Output
- 10.1. 1 To 5 MW
- 10.2. Above 5 MW
- 10.3. Below 1 MW
- 11. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Ownership Model
- 11.1. Leased
- 11.2. Owned
- 12. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by End-Use Industry
- 12.1. Chemicals
- 12.2. Food & Beverage
- 12.3. Manufacturing
- 12.4. Oil & Gas
- 13. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Application
- 13.1. Exhaust Gas Recovery
- 13.2. Geothermal Supplementation
- 13.3. Process Heat Recovery
- 13.4. Solar Thermal Integration
- 14. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Installation Type
- 14.1. Mobile
- 14.2. Modular
- 14.3. On-Site
- 15. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Sales Channel
- 15.1. Aftermarket
- 15.2. Original Equipment Manufacturer
- 16. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Region
- 16.1. Americas
- 16.1.1. North America
- 16.1.2. Latin America
- 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 16.2.1. Europe
- 16.2.2. Middle East
- 16.2.3. Africa
- 16.3. Asia-Pacific
- 17. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Group
- 17.1. ASEAN
- 17.2. GCC
- 17.3. European Union
- 17.4. BRICS
- 17.5. G7
- 17.6. NATO
- 18. Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market, by Country
- 18.1. United States
- 18.2. Canada
- 18.3. Mexico
- 18.4. Brazil
- 18.5. United Kingdom
- 18.6. Germany
- 18.7. France
- 18.8. Russia
- 18.9. Italy
- 18.10. Spain
- 18.11. China
- 18.12. India
- 18.13. Japan
- 18.14. Australia
- 18.15. South Korea
- 19. United States Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market
- 20. China Low Temperature Waste-Heat Power Generation System Market
- 21. Competitive Landscape
- 21.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
- 21.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
- 21.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
- 21.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
- 21.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
- 21.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
- 21.5. ABB Ltd.
- 21.6. Alfa Laval AB
- 21.7. Amec Foster Wheeler
- 21.8. Bosch Industriekessel GmbH
- 21.9. Calnetix Technologies, LLC
- 21.10. Caterpillar Inc.
- 21.11. Climeon AB
- 21.12. Cool Energy, Inc.
- 21.13. Durr Group AG
- 21.14. Echogen Power Systems LLC
- 21.15. ElectraTherm, Inc.
- 21.16. Forbes Marshall Pvt. Ltd.
- 21.17. GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
- 21.18. General Electric Company
- 21.19. IHI Corporation
- 21.20. John Wood Group PLC
- 21.21. Kaishan Group Co., Ltd.
- 21.22. Kaishan Group Co., Ltd.
- 21.23. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 21.24. MAN Energy Solutions SE
- 21.25. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
- 21.26. Ormat Technologies, Inc.
- 21.27. Siemens AG
- 21.28. Thermax Limited
- 21.29. Wärtsilä Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
